DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17,...

17
DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005

Transcript of DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17,...

Page 1: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE

DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE

Board of Governors

Strategic Planning Committee

November 17, 2005

Page 2: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 2November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Bachelor Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?How Do University Bachelor Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

Bachelor Degrees 43,144 57,638 56,090

2004-05 Actual 2012-13 BOG Goal2012-13 University

Plans

97% of Goal

Lower by Equivalent of One Year’s Planned Growth

97% of Goal

Lower by Equivalent of One Year’s Planned Growth

Page 3: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 3November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Masters Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?How Do University Masters Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?

02,0004,0006,0008,000

10,00012,00014,00016,00018,00020,000

Masters Degrees 13,268 17,514 18,519

2004-05 Actual2012-13 BOG

Goal2012-13

University Plans

106% of Goal

106% of Goal

Page 4: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 4November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Emerging Tech Doctorate Plans Compare to BOG Goals?How Do University Emerging Tech Doctorate Plans Compare to BOG Goals?

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Emerging Tech DoctoralDegrees

621 941 1,158 1,317

2004-05 Actual

2012-13 Goal (Low)

2012-13 Univ Plans

2012-13 Goal (High)

Within BOG Goal Range

Within BOG Goal Range

Page 5: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 5November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Professional Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?How Do University Professional Degree Plans Compare to BOG Goals?

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

First Prof Degrees 1,539 2,167 2,251

2004-05 Actual 2012-13 BOG Goal 2012-13 Univ Plans

104% of Goal104% of Goal

Page 6: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 6November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Degree Plans Compare with University Enrollment Plans?How Do University Degree Plans Compare with University Enrollment Plans?

STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM PLANNED ENROLLMENT AND DEGREE GROWTH 2004-2013

0%

50%

100%

Enrollment Growth 35% 45% 54% 47%

Degree Growth 30% 40% 79% 48%

UndergradMast / Law /

PharmDDoctoral Medical

Page 7: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 7November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do University Degree Plans Compare with University Enrollment Plans?How Do University Degree Plans Compare with University Enrollment Plans?

STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM PLANNED ENROLLMENT AND DEGREE GROWTH

(EXCLUDING USF) 2004-2013

0%

50%

100%

Enrollment Growth 29% 32% 38% 35%

Degree Growth 30% 42% 88% 25%

UndergradMast / Law /

PharmDDoctoral Medical

USF is in process of revising enrollment plans

USF is in process of revising enrollment plans

Page 8: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 8November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Are the Key Variables in Enrollment Planning?What Are the Key Variables in Enrollment Planning?

# of new applicants# of new

applicants

% of applicants admitted

% of applicants admitted

% of admitted applicants who enroll

(yield)

% of admitted applicants who enroll

(yield)

% of enrolled students who

return (retention)

% of enrolled students who

return (retention)

# of credits per student

(intensity)

# of credits per student

(intensity)

Page 9: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 9November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Factors Determine the Number of Applicants?What Factors Determine the Number of Applicants?

Preparation Cost/Perception of Value

Demographics

Number of Applicants

Largely determined by external factors

Tuition and financial aid are main policy tools

Recruiting / outreach also important

Largely determined by external factors

Tuition and financial aid are main policy tools

Recruiting / outreach also important

Page 10: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 10November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Closely Have Applications Tracked Certain Trends in Florida?How Closely Have Applications Tracked Certain Trends in Florida?

90%100%110%120%130%140%150%160%170%180%190%

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

SUS Fall Freshman Applicants Public HS GradsSAT Test-Takers 18-19 Population

Page 11: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 11November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Factors Determine the Percent of Applicants Admitted?What Factors Determine the Percent of Applicants Admitted?

Estimates of Yield (Next Slide)

Institutional / System Policy, Planning, and Finance

Percent of Applicants Admitted

Primarily a policy / planning decision

Only variable entirely in institution’s / system’s control

Primarily a policy / planning decision

Only variable entirely in institution’s / system’s control

Page 12: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 12November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Factors Determine the Percent of Admitted Students Who Enroll (Yield)?What Factors Determine the Percent of Admitted Students Who Enroll (Yield)?

Institutional Appeal

Demographics Student Choice

Economic Conditions

Other Institutions’ Admissions Decisions

Yield

Limited ability to affect through policy

Financial aid is an important management tool

Institutions use past experience to estimate yield

Competitors’ decisions affect the equation

Limited ability to affect through policy

Financial aid is an important management tool

Institutions use past experience to estimate yield

Competitors’ decisions affect the equation

Page 13: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 13November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Factors Determine the Percent of Enrolled Students Who Return (Retention)?What Factors Determine the Percent of Enrolled Students Who Return (Retention)?

Completers Drop-outs and stop-outs

Transfers-out

Retention

Limited ability to affect directly through policy

Initiatives can produce incremental changes

Limited ability to affect directly through policy

Initiatives can produce incremental changes

EconomicsEconomics

Academ

icsA

cademics

Page 14: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 14November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Factors Determine the Number of Credits Per Student (Intensity)?What Factors Determine the Number of Credits Per Student (Intensity)?

Course Availability

Economic Conditions

Academic Ability

Student Level and Program

Intensity

Limited ability to make radical shifts

Course scheduling and tuition structure are main policy tools to create incremental change

Limited ability to make radical shifts

Course scheduling and tuition structure are main policy tools to create incremental change

Page 15: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 15November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

What Other Factors Can Impact Enrollment Planning?What Other Factors Can Impact Enrollment Planning?

Disruptive events

– 9/11

– Hurricanes Economic Cycles State Budget/Other External Funding

Page 16: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 16November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

How Do External Factors Affect Demand?How Do External Factors Affect Demand?

Growth in Florida Non-Farm Employment and Growth in State University System Graduate

School Applications

-10.00%

-5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05

Growth, Jobs Growth, Graduate School Applications

Page 17: DEGREE AND ENROLLMENT PLANNING UPDATE Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee November 17, 2005.

Board of Governors 17November 17, 2005 [DRAFT]

Summary . . .Summary . . .

Degree plans are close to Board of Governors goals Enrollment plans are aligned with degree plans Universities’ enrollment planning processes differ in

details Common variables are

– Applications (demand)– Acceptance rate– Yield Rate– Retention Rate– Intensity of Attendance