Degeneracy and Correlation in Neutrino Oscillation Parameters Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan...

34
Degeneracy and Correla tion in Neutrino Oscil lation Parameters Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University
  • date post

    18-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    225
  • download

    0

Transcript of Degeneracy and Correlation in Neutrino Oscillation Parameters Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan...

Degeneracy and Correlation in Neutrino Oscillation Parameter

s

Degeneracy and Correlation in Neutrino Oscillation Parameter

s

Hisakazu MinakataTokyo Metropolitan University

Hisakazu MinakataTokyo Metropolitan University

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Degeneracy is common in everyday life

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

A machinery in my talk

Oscillation probability draw ellipse if plotted in bi-P plane

Role played by CP phase and the matter clearly distinguished

Art work by Adam Para Art work by Adam Para

Two solutions of S232 xTwo solutions of S23

2 x

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Cause of the degeneracy; easy to understand

• You can draw two ellipses from a point in P-Pbar space

• Intrinsic degeneracy

• Doubled by the unknown sign of m2

• 4-fold degeneracy

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

23 octant degeneracy

Pe= sin2213 x s223

Pe= sin2213 x s223

Solar m2 on

Matter effect on

Solar m2 on

Matter effect on

OY Nufact03OY Nufact03

Altogether 8-fold degeneracyAltogether 8-fold degeneracy

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Structure of intrinsic & sign-m2 degeneracy in (matter) perturbative regime

• Intrinsic degeneracy;

• sign(m2)- degeneracy arises because P is approx. invariant under:

m2 m2

T2K IIT2K II

MN JHEP01MN JHEP01

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Invitation to

degeneracy solving

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

General comments• Degeneracy occurs because of the lack of

information, e.g., P, Pe and Pe-bar at a particular energy

• Therefore, it can be resolved by adding information easy for theorists

• Practically, however, NOT an easy task to carry out experimentally

• Discussion cannot be purely “theoretical” and has to involve “feasibility of the measurement” you propose, and “practicality of the experiments” No unique

answer !

No unique answer !

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Possible alternative strategies toward the resolution

• Conceptually simple• Probably require

multiple detectors/settings

• Inevitable if 3 types of degeneracy tightly couple with each other

• More practical and experimentalists friendly

• Has to show that one can do the job one by one

Everything at once approachEverything at once approach

One by one resolution approachOne by one resolution approach

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

General comments (continued)

• Lifting sign-m2 degeneracy requires matter effect long baseline => \gsim 1000 km required

• intrinsic degeneracy can be efficiently resolved by spectrum information

• Generally speaking,23 octant degeneracy tends to decouple from others

• many ideas welcome

Exception: m2(ee) - m2() methodException: m2(ee) - m2() method

alternative ways ?alternative ways ?

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

factory as ultimate degeneracy solver

• By combining at 3 detectors at 130, 730, and 2810 km, it was claimed that neutrino factory can resolve all the 8-fold degeneracy if 13 > 1° (Donini, NuFACT03)

Typical everything at once type Typical everything at once type

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Golden + silver NuFact + superbeam

• 1st concrete way that proved to work for resolution of all the degeneracy

• Powerful, work down to 1-2 degree of 13

• Note that Vcb ~ 2 degree • Yet, a bit expensive; • conservatively ~1000 Million Euro/d

egeneracy (rich man’s solution) • Ultimate degeneracy solver, but certainly

not “Mayflower” (unless 13 ~ 1o)

Highly nontrivial!Highly nontrivial!

If NuFACT reached “J-PARC stage” everything changes !If NuFACT reached “J-PARC stage” everything changes !

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

From “black-box”to the anatomy of degeneracy

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Anatomy of degeneracy

• To make real progress, it is important to have a systematic understanding of the nature of degeneracy

• Need concrete framework to analyze the question

• 1st order in matter perturbation theory plus corresponding appropriate experimental setting;

• T2K II or T2KK(Kamioka-Korea) Ishitsuka et al. 05 Ishitsuka et al. 05

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Let’s start from the intrinsic degeneracy

• degenerate solution at VOM:

13(2) = 13

(1)

T2K IIT2K II

Spectrum analysis should be powerful !

Spectrum analysis should be powerful !

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Spectral information IS powerful(almost) resolve intrinsic degeneracy at sin2213=0.01(almost) resolve intrinsic degeneracy at sin2213=0.01

T2K II (from 1000 page Ishitsuka file) T2K II (from 1000 page Ishitsuka file)

SK momentum resolution ~30 MeV at 1 GeVSK momentum resolution ~30 MeV at 1 GeV

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Expected Expected signal, BG and signal, BG and

22 and anti-

×Kamioka and Korea

and anti-×

Kamioka and Korea

5 energy bins5 energy bins

syst. Errors:

5% BG (overall) 5% BG (energy dep.) 5% signal efficiency

syst. Errors:

5% BG (overall) 5% BG (energy dep.) 5% signal efficiency

4yrs + 4yrs anti-sin2213=0.1, =/2

4yrs + 4yrs anti-sin2213=0.1, =/2

signalsignal

BGBG

Kajita in NOVE2006Kajita in NOVE2006

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Sign-m2 degeneracy• Resolution of sign-m2 degen

eracy requires the matter effect

• Requires baseline ~1000 km• 2nd detector seems required t

o go down to sin2213=.02

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

T2K(0.54 Mt) vs. T2KK(0.27+0.27 Mt)

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

It is not quite only the matter effect

• With the same input parameter and Korean detector of 0.54 Mt the sign-m2 degeneracy is NOT completely resolved

2 identical detector method powerful !

2 identical detector method powerful !

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Energy dependence far more dynamic in 2nd oscillation maximum

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

How to solve 23 octant degeneracy

• Detect solar Dm2 term ~c23

2

• Requires baseline ~ earth radius

• well controlled systematic error plus enormous statistics

• Powerful at small 13

• Combining reactor measurement of 13

• Requires great precision in 13 measurement

• Powerful at large 13

• If feasible, “Mossbauer” helps

Strategy: Look for terms which depend on 23 but not through the form s23

2 x sin2213

Strategy: Look for terms which depend on 23 but not through the form s23

2 x sin2213

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

[email protected]@NNN05Atm ; powerful way for octant degene.Atm ; powerful way for octant degene.

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Reactor + accelerator method

• Acc-disappearance => s2

23=0.4 or 0.6• Acc-appearance =

> s223sin2213 = 0.

06• Reactor =>

sin2213 = 0.1

• Solves 23 degeneracy

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Region of resolved 23 degeneracy

T2K II (4MW+HK) + phase II type reactorT2K II (4MW+HK) + phase II type reactor

Hiraide et al. (7 samurai) Hiraide et al. (7 samurai)

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Decoupling of the degeneracy

• Suppose that you succeed to solve the particular degeneracy, by forgetting about the remaining ones

• It does NOT necessarily mean that the problem is solved

• You have to verify that your treatment of degeneracy A is valid irrespective of the presence of degeneracy B

• One solution: decoupling between the degeneracy

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

23 and sign-m2 degeneracy decouple

• For example, one can show, to first order in matter effect, the followings:

P(octant) = P(1st octant) - P(2nd) is invariant under the interchange of two sign-m2 degenerate pair

P(hierarchy) = P(m2 +) - P(m2 -) is invariant under the interchange of two 23 octant degenerate pair

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Intrinsic degeneracy decouple ?

• Intrinsic degeneracy nearly decouples from the rest

• More importantly, in T2K II setting, it is resolved by spectrum analysis decouple from the game

• Altogether three degeneracies (approximately) decouple with each other in T2K (or T2KK) setting

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Correlation rather than

degeneracy

?

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Correlation ?• The title of this talk

contains “correlation”. What about that ?

• “correlation” may be incompletely resolved degeneracy

• No continuous degeneracy in Pe

Nufact golden Nufact golden

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

No significant “correlation” in T2K II

Spectral information importantSpectral information important

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Many remaining questions • Does beam help ??

• Does monochromatic beam help ??

• To what extent the lower energy threshold of NuFACT change the sensitivity of resolving degeneracy ?

• What would be a powerful supplementary measurement ?

ISS NuFACT ongoing, report expected in Sep. 06

ISS NuFACT ongoing, report expected in Sep. 06

example: 12 for m2ee - m2

methodexample: 12 for m2ee - m2

method

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

Conclusion • Nature of the degeneracy well understood

• With T2KK or similar 2 detector settings there appeared a well defined method for lifting intrinsic and sign-m2 degeneracy

• Spectral information solves intrinsic degeneracy and matter effect does sign-m2 degeneracy

• Resolving 23 degeneracy requires solar term or reactor II

• Consistency maintained by “decoupling”

May. 2-6, 2006 SNOW@Stockholm

->e appearance probability