Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson...
-
Upload
shawn-hutchinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson...
![Page 1: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Chapter 10
© 2007 Thomson Learning/South-Western Callan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
![Page 2: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Defining Air Quality
Air quality in the U.S. and other nations is defined through standards that set limits on anthropogenic pollutants Anthropogenic pollutants are contaminants
associated with human activity Natural pollutants are those that come about
through nonartificial processes in nature
![Page 3: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Overview of U.S. Air Quality Legislation
Early evolution There were no national air quality laws until the
Air Pollution Control Act of 1955 There was no truly comprehensive legislation
until Clean Air Act of 1963
![Page 4: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Overview of U.S. Air Quality Legislation
Current U.S. Policy 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments use some
market-based approaches, but the underlying structure continues to be command-and-control oriented
![Page 5: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Identifying Major Air Pollutants
Criteria pollutants are substances known to be hazardous to health and welfare, characterized as harmful by criteria documents
Hazardous air pollutants are noncriteria pollutants that may cause or contribute to irreversible illness or increased mortality
![Page 6: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Setting Standards to Define Air Quality
EPA sets national standards for the major air pollutants to be met by potentially controllable sources Stationary sources are fixed-site producers of
pollution, such as a building or manufacturing plant
Mobile sources are any nonstationary polluting sources, including all transport vehicles
![Page 7: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Standards for Criteria Air Pollutants
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set maximum allowable concentrations of criteria air pollutants Primary NAAQS are set to protect public health
from air pollution, with some margin of safety Secondary NAAQS are set to protect public
welfare from any adverse, nonhealth effects of air pollution
![Page 8: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
6 Criteria Air Pollutants
particulate matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
carbon monoxide (CO) nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
tropospheric ozone (O3)
lead (Pb)
![Page 9: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) are set to protect public health and the environment and are applicable to every major source of any identified hazardous air pollutant Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT) is the technology that achieves the reduction to be accomplished by the NESHAP
![Page 10: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Infrastructure To Implement the StandardsTwo Key Elements
State Implementation Plan (SIP) An EPA-approved procedure outlining how a state
intends to implement, monitor, and enforce the NAAQS and the NESHAP
Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) A federally-designated geographic area within
which common air pollution problems are shared by several communities
![Page 11: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Reclassification of AQCRs
In 1974, following a suit filed by the Sierra Club, AQCRs were reassessed to identify 3 types of regions: Regions that met or exceeded the standards as Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) areas Regions not in compliance with the standards as
nonattainment areas Regions with insufficient data
In 1990, the new CAA Amendments reclassified all nonattainment areas into new categories that identified the severity of the pollution
![Page 12: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Monitoring Air Quality Across Regions
Estimating pollutant emissions levels Best available engineering methods are used to
derive annual emissions estimates for over 450 source categories
Measuring pollutant concentrations Pollutant concentration levels are measured at
air-monitoring station sites located throughout the country
Most of these sites are in urban regions Reported to the EPA via an air-monitoring network
![Page 13: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Analysis of U.S. Air Quality PolicyEvaluation Criteria
Equity criterion Environmental justice
In 1993, environmental justice became one of the EPA’s seven guiding principles
Economic criterion Allocative efficiency
Arises where marginal social costs (MSC) and marginal social benefits (MSB) are equal
![Page 14: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Portney’s Benefit-Cost Analysis of 1990 Policy
Offers a point estimate for MSB of $14 billion and a point estimate for MSC of $32 billion annually
Since MSC far outweighs MSB, it might be that Titles II through V of the 1990 Amendments overregulate society
![Page 15: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Graphing Portney’s Findings $
1 99
0 b
i llio
ns
Abatement
MSC
MSB
AE A19900
32
14
Inefficiency
![Page 16: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
EPA’s Benefit-Cost Analysis of 1990 Policy
In its final report to Congress, the EPA estimates that the present value of net benefits associated with Titles I through V of the 1990 CAAA for the 1990 to 2010 period is $510 billion ($1990)
EPA’s quantitative results, though recognized as based on sound methods and data, are considered to be controversial on a number of fronts Discussed in Freeman (2002) and Krupnick and
Morgenstern (2002)
![Page 17: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Analysis of NAAQSTwo Potential Sources of Inefficiency
No cost considerations in standard-setting Uniformity of the standards
![Page 18: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Absence of Cost Considerations
NAAQS are solely benefit-based Economic feasibility not explicitly considered Primary standards include “margin of safety”
![Page 19: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Uniformity of NAAQS
NAAQS are nationally based, ignoring regional cost or benefit differences e.g. different pollution levels, access to technology,
demographics, etc.
Exception is that distinctions are allowed for PSD areas PSD areas face higher standards than NAAQS Are higher standards for PSDs efficient?
Only if MSCPSD = MSBPSD at a higher A level Let’s examine possible scenarios that support such an
outcome
![Page 20: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Scenarios Achieving Efficiency
MSCNON MSCPSD
MSBPSD = MSBNON
$
AANON APSD
(a)
MSCPSD = MSCNON
MSBNON
MSBPSD
$
AANON APSD
(b)
MSCNON
MSCPSD
MSBPSD
MSBNON
$
AANON APSD
(c) Which of these are feasible?
![Page 21: Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ecf5503460f94bdd79f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Feasibility
Panels (a) and (b) are not likely. Why? MSBNON likely higher than MSBPSD
MSCNON likely higher than MSCPSD
Panel (c) is possible only under a series of conditions
Suggests that higher standards in PSD areas may be justifiable on efficiency grounds but only under certain economic conditions.