Default ReportMSFT Dyadic and Group Clinical Supervisor Evaluation- FMTH 696/697- Cohorts 53 and 54October 25, 2019 2:23 PM MDT

Q1 - Please select your DYADIC Clinical Supervisor from the following menu.

Showing rows 1 - 1 of 1

# FieldChoiceCount

1 Jennifer Jay, Ph.D., LCMFT 100.00% 6

Jennifer Jay,Ph.D., LCMFT

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5

Q8 - My Dyadic Supervisor reflects the mission of the MSFT program (The MSFT

Program embodies core Quaker values while engaging students on an educational

journey of personal and professional transformation to affect change in the lives of those

they will serve).

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q9 - My DYADIC supervisor reflects the mission of Friends University (Friends University,

a Christian University of Quaker heritage, equips students to honor God and serve others

by integrating their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q10 - My DYADIC supervisor was accessible.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q12 - My DYADIC supervisor responded to me in a timely manner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q13 - My DYADIC supervisor is clinically competent.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q14 - My DYADIC supervisor displays sensitivity and awareness of multicultural issues.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

Q15 - My DYADIC supervisor is reliable.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q16 - My DYADIC supervisor displays behavior that "merits the public trust" (e.g. good

judgement, integrity, honesty, respect for others, reliability, self-discipline, self-evaluation,

and commitment to the profession.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q17 - My DYADIC supervisor provided a safe learning environment.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q18 - My DYADIC supervisor was prepared and punctual.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q19 - My DYADIC supervisor used audio/visual data in a positive manner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q20 - My DYADIC supervisor balanced the time well between me and my dyad partner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

Q21 - My DYADIC supervisor assisted my development of Interpersonal Competency.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q22 - My DYADIC supervisor assisted my development of Theoretical Competency.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q23 - My DYADIC supervisor assisted my development of Clinical Competency.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q24 - My DYADIC supervisor assisted my development of Multicultural Competency.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q3 - Please rate your overall level of satisfaction with DYADIC supervision.

# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count

1 Overall level of satisfaction with DYADIC supervision. 81.00 100.00 93.83 6.41 41.14 6

Q4 - Please identify areas of strength for your DYADIC supervisor.

Please identify areas of strength for your DYADIC supervisor.

Available for urgent clients

Always available and punctual for supervision. Very knowledgable and practical in advice

Flexibility in supervision needs

Supervisor provided helpful feedback and direction on client cases

Q5 - Please identify areas of improvement for your DYADIC supervisor.

Please identify areas of improvement for your DYADIC supervisor.

Multicultural

A little bit more structure in time spent in dyad

Q6 - Please select your GROUP Clinical Supervisor from the following menu.

Danielle Blea, MSLCMFT

Brenda Brown, MSLCMFT

Daina Schatzman,MS, LCMFT

Jennifer Jay, LCMFT

Steve Rathbun,Ph.D, LCMFT

Rebecca CulverTurner, PhD LCMFT

Barbara Lucas, MS,LCMFT

Elizabeth Miranda,MS, LCMFT

Kim Rigsby, MSLCMFT

Katrina Stoddard,MS, LCMFT

Michelle Worley,MS LCMFT

Michael Brewer, MS,LCMFT

Erin Cavanaugh, MSLCMFT

Dianne Held, LCMFT

Tara Lancelot, MSLCMFT

Janet Clevenger,LCMFT

Christopher Habben,PhD, LCMFT

Sarah Lyon, PhDLCMFT

Eric Parks, MS,LCMFT

Corey Schliep, PhD,LCMFT

Roy White, MS,LCMFT

MS, LCMFT

J. MichelleRobertson, Ph.D.,

LCMFT

Mary Jones, MS,LCMFT

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Showing rows 1 - 24 of 24

# FieldChoiceCount

1 Danielle Blea, MS LCMFT 0.00% 0

2 Michael Brewer, MS, LCMFT 33.33% 2

3 Brenda Brown, MS LCMFT 16.67% 1

4 Erin Cavanaugh, MS LCMFT 0.00% 0

5 Daina Schatzman, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

6 Dianne Held, LCMFT 16.67% 1

7 Jennifer Jay, LCMFT 0.00% 0

8 Tara Lancelot, MS LCMFT 0.00% 0

9 Steve Rathbun, Ph.D, LCMFT 0.00% 0

10 Janet Clevenger, LCMFT 0.00% 0

11 Rebecca Culver Turner, PhD LCMFT 0.00% 0

12 Christopher Habben, PhD, LCMFT 0.00% 0

13 Barbara Lucas, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

14 Sarah Lyon, PhD LCMFT 0.00% 0

15 Elizabeth Miranda, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

16 Eric Parks, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

17 Kim Rigsby, MS LCMFT 0.00% 0

18 Corey Schliep, PhD, LCMFT 0.00% 0

19 Katrina Stoddard, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

20 Roy White, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

21 Michelle Worley, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

22 Mary Jones, MS, LCMFT 0.00% 0

23 J. Michelle Robertson, Ph.D., LCMFT 33.33% 2

6

Q25 - My Group Supervisor reflects the mission of the MSFT program (The MSFT

Program embodies core Quaker values while engaging students on an educational

journey of personal and professional transformation to affect change in the lives of those

they will serve).

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q26 - My GROUP supervisor reflects the mission of Friends University (Friends

University, a Christian University of Quker heritage, equips students to honor God and

serve others by integrating their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q27 - My GROUP supervisor was accessible.

Q28 - My GROUP supervisor responded to me in a timely manner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q29 - My GROUP supervisor is clinically competent.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Q30 - My GROUP supervisor displays sensitivity and awareness to multicultural issues.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q31 - My GROUP supervisor is reliable.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q32 - My GROUP supervisor displays behavior that "merits the public trust" (good

judgment, integrity, honesty, reliability, respect for others, respect for laws, self-discipline,

self-evaluation, commitment to the profession).

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q33 - My GROUP supervisor provided a safe learning environment.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q34 - My GROUP supervisor was prepared and punctual.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q35 - My GROUP supervisor used audio/visual data in a positive manner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q37 - My GROUP supervisor balanced the time well between me and my dyad partner.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nordisagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Q38 - Please rate your overall satisfaction with GROUP supervision.

Q39 - Please identify areas of strength for your GROUP supervisor.

Please identify areas of strength for your GROUP supervisor.

Able to listen and give advice for difficult situations with in the clinical environment

She was very knowledgable but let us work through issues without answering first. This led to some really good conversations and dialogue.

Balance of time spent on the multiple clinical factors. I also appreciate your ability to push us (students) to reach their potential even when it it’s notnecessarily desired

Supervisor provided helpful feed back and direction and allowed for group input and discussion

Q40 - Please identify areas of improvement for your GROUP supervisor.

End of Report

Please identify areas of improvement for your GROUP supervisor.

Group was sometimes unproductive

N/A