DEcREE OF THE DIREcTOR GENERAl OF MARINE, · PDF fileArisetiarso Soemodinoto, Ph.D., The...

i

i

MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIESDIREcTORATE GENERAl OF MARINE, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS

DIREcTORATE FOR cONSERVATION OF AREA AND FISH SPEcIES

Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16Gedung Mina Bahari III, lt. 10, Jakarta Pusat 10110

Telp/Fax : (021) 3522045

© 2012

ISBN : 978-602-98450-8-2

DEcREE OF THE DIREcTOR GENERAl OF MARINE, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS NUMBER KEP.44/KP3K/2012

cONcERNING

TEcHNIcAl GUIDElINES FOR EVAlUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFEcTIVENESS OF AQUATIc, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS

cONSERVATION AREAS (E-KKP3K)

ii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

iiTe

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

iii

iii

This Technical Guidelines was written by the Working Group for Development of Guidelines for Evaluating Aquatic Conservation Areas Management Effectiveness at the Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI), Directorate General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. The Working Group members were:

1. Drs. Riyanto Basuki, M.Si, Deputy Director for Area Conservation, KKJI. 2. Suraji, SP, M.Si, Head of Area Protection and Conservation Section, KKJI. 3. Arisetiarso Soemodinoto, Ph.D., The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Indonesia Marine Program. 4. Handoko Adi Susanto, D.Sc., USAID Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) Program. 5. Irfan Yulianto, M.Si, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Indonesia Marine Program. 6. M. Khazali, M.Si, Conservation International (CI) Indonesia. 7. Ir. Sudarsono Kimpul, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Indonesia.

Suggested citationDirectorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (2012). Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K). Jakarta: Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species, Directorate General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, ix + 61 pp.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Contributions from the following, either direct or indirectly, are greatly appreciated. Apologies for those who are not mentioned due to limited space.

1. Dr. Sudirman Saad, M.Hum, Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands (KP3K). 2. Ir. Sri Atmini, M.Sc, Secretary to the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands. 3. Dr. Toni Ruchimat, M.Sc, Director for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI). 4. Ir. Agus Dermawan, M.Si, Director for Utilization of Small Islands. 5. Dr. Subandono Diposaptono, M.Eng, Director for Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Spatial Planning. 6. Ir. M. Eko Rudianto, M.Bus.IT, Director for Marine and Coasts Affairs. 7. Ir. Ansori Zawawi, M.Si, MM, Director for Coastal Community Empowerment and Business Development. 8. Syamsulbahri Lubis, A.Pi, MM, Deputy Director for Area and Fish Species Utilization, KKJI. 9. Ir. Ahsanal Kasasiah, M.Agr.Bus, Deputy Director for Conservation Data, Information and Network, KKJI. 10. Dr. Pamuji Lestari, Deputy Director for Conservation of Fish, KKJI. 11. Ir. Yulita Wismaneli, Head of Monitoring & Evaluation Section, KP3K. 12. Ir. Iriawanti, Auditor of Inspectorate III. 13. Dr. Yesaya Mau, Head of National Aquatic Conservation Area Office (BKKPN) Kupang. 14. Dr. Ahmad Aris, Head of National Aquatic Conservation Area Office (LKKPN) Pekanbaru. 15. Raimundus Nggajo, ST, M.Si, Head of Utilization and Surveillance Section BKKPN Kupang.16. Agus Widayanto, S.Sos, Head of Conservation Area Utilization Section, KKJI. 17. Rofi Alhanif, M.Sc, Head of Conservation Network Section, KKJI. 18. Cora Mustika, A.Pi, MM, Head of Fish Species Conservation Design Section, KKJI. 19. Dr. Firdaus AK, M.Sc, Head of Conservation Area Design Section, KKJI. 20. Suko Wardhono, A.Pi, MM, Head of Office Administration, KKJI. 21. Sarmintohadi, M.Si, Head of Fish Species Protection and Conservation Section, KKJI. 22. Asri Nurhayati, Head of Reporting Section, Secretariat of Director General KP3K. 23. Ir. M. Saefudin, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 24. Leny Dwihastuty, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 25. Yusuf Arif Affandy, ST, Staff of KKJI. 26. Yusra, S.Si, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 27. A. Darwis, S.Sos, Staff of KKJI. 28. Muschan Ashari, S.Hut, Staff of KKJI. 29. Ahmad Sofiullah, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 30. Anita Setianingsih, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 31. Amehr Hakim, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 32. Ana Rojayati, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 33. Sinta Agustina, ST, Staff of Inspectorate III. 34. Ugeng Wijanarko, A.Md, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 35. Helena Yusfik, S.TP, ME, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 36. Susi Susanti, S.St.Pi, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 37. Jeffry Syam, SH, Staff of Legal Section KP3K. 38. A. Boby Yefry Adi Rianto, S.Pi, Staff of BKKPN Kupang. 39. Yudi Herdiana, M.Si, WCS Indonesia Marine Program. 40. Ir. M. Imran Amin, TNC. 41. Dr. Budy Wiryawan, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB). 42. Dr. Ir. Fernando Dangeubun, M.Si, IPB. 43. Rony Megawanto, ST., MIDEC, USAID-MPAG. 44. Ir. Anton Wijonarno, WWF Indonesia.

Financial support for formulating the Technical Guidelines (and printing of this booklet through The Nature

Conservancy Indonesia Marine Program) was provided by Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) program, an

initiative of USAID/Mission to Indonesia.

iv Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

ivTe

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

v

vFOREWORD

Director for Conservation of Area and Fish SpeciesMinistry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

Conservation is of global concern today, and is a strategic

issue for several countries, including Indonesia. With

an abundant fish resource potential, Indonesia has

to be able manage these resources effectively and

sustainably for the good of its people. Management of

fish resources in Indonesia was initiated in 1990 with the passing of

Law 5 on conservation of biological resources and their ecosystems.

However, a more specific legal umbrella for conservation of fish

resources did not come until 2004, when Law 31/2004 on fisheries was

passed, and subsequently amended by Law 45/2009. Further, the fish resource conservation

mandate is outlined in Government Regulation 60/2007, which was followed by other technical

regulations in the form of guidelines and ministerial regulations. Since the establishment of this

legal umbrella, conservation of fish resources in Indonesia has intensified.

National and local government initiatives in fish resource conservation had created no less

than 16 million hectares of marine conservation areas by the end of 2012. The Indonesian

government has committed to increasing this expanse of marine conservation area to 20 million

hectares by 2020. This commitment is in keeping with the commitment to making management

of these areas more effective.

Preparation of these Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness

of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas is an initiative of the Directorate for

Conservation of Area and Fish Species towards achieving this target of effective management.

These guidelines are the result of the adoption and combination of a number of internationally

accepted methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the management of conservation, such as

‘Guidebook of Natural and Social Indicators for Evaluating Marine Protected Area Management

Effectiveness’, ‘Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness

Goals for Marine Protected Areas’, ‘Guide for Improving Marine Protected Area Management

Effectiveness in Indonesia’, and others.

REMARKS

Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

The Government of Indonesia has committed to establish 20 million hectare of aquatic (marine) conservation areas in 2020. This commitment certainly must be accompanied by efforts to effectively manage those areas so they able to provide great benefits to the stakeholders, particularly

local communities, and the conserved biodiversity resources.

Effectively managed conservation area is in agreement with the Ministry of Marine Affaris and Fisheries’ program aiming at generating social-economic and cultural benefits for people and sustainability of

resources. Furthermore, conservation areas can also be developed to embrace principles of blue economy, i.e. poverty eradication, social inclusiveness, and resources sustainability.

I therefore welcome this Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas which is known as E-KKP3K Guidelines. I also applaud the efforts of Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI), in collaboration with a consortium of international non-governmental organizations under Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) program, to produce the Guidelines. Besides timely, the Guidelines will close the gap of lacking of tools that can be used to evaluate management performance and effectiveness of aquatic (marine) conservation areas comprehensively.

I really hope that this E-KKP3K Guidelines can be adopted by decision-makers as standard tools for evaluating the performance of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and can simultaneously be utilized by managers and planners at site level to prioritize activities for managing the area effectively.

Finally, I hope this manual will contribute to the effective and sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia.

Dr. Sudirman Saad

vi Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

viTe

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

vii

vii

This manual contains the procedures or guidelines for evaluating the effectiveness of the

sustainable management of marine conservation areas. This manual is expected to be used

by policy makers as an instrument for evaluating the performance of marine, coast and small

islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and as a tool for establishing development priorities for

the effective management of these areas. At the macro level, the guidelines are intended for use

by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries to evaluate the effectiveness of the management

of marine conservation areas across Indonesia. At the macro level, the guidelines can be used

for self-evaluation of the effectiveness of management of a particular marine conservation area,

and for making plans to improve management performance.

The guidelines divide effective management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands

conservation area into five levels. Starting from the lowest level of management, these are:

Level 1 (red), Level 2 (yellow), Level 3 (green), Level 4 (blue) and Level 5 (gold). These levels

are determined by 17 (seventeen) criteria, which are elucidated in 74 (seventy-four) questions.

These parameters are used in the process of evaluating effectiveness to assess the status of

the area’s reserves, institutions, management and zoning plans, and infrastructure. The scope

of the evaluation covers management, conservation/resources, and socio-economic-cultural

aspects that are relevant to conservation area management.

Preparation of these guidelines went through a process of discussions and workshops, which

involved stakeholders to get their input and feedback. Trials were also conducted in selected

locations, such as Pesisir Selatan District, Batang District, and all National Marine Conservation

Areas. During these processes, a great deal of input was gathered and revisions were made

to create the guidelines that can now be used as the manual for evaluating management

effectiveness. On 9 October 2012, the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands

signed Decree Number Kep.44/KP3K/2012 which ratified the issue of these guidelines.

Accompanying software is now being developed to facilitate actual evaluations in the field. This

software is expected to be operational in the near future.

In follow up to the preparation of this manual, in 2013 the Directorate for Conservation of

Area and Fish Species will perform evaluations of the effectiveness of the management of all

aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia using this instrument. The

conservation area deemed to have the most effective management will be rewarded with a KKP

Award. The activities planned for this year’s agenda should motivate the managers of these

conservation areas to continue to work hard to create conservation areas that are effectively and

sustainably managed. As well as the KKP Award, another key output of these activities is the

recommended management priorities for the all conservation areas that have been evaluated.

We would like to thank everyone for their contribution to the preparation of this manual, in

particular the partner NGOs in the Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) consortium

for their hard work. We welcome constructive feedback and input to improve these guidelines,

and hope that this manual will contribute to the effective and sustainable management of

conservation areas in Indonesia.

Dr. Toni Ruchimat

viii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

viii

Tech

nica

l Gui

delin

es fo

r Eva

luat

ing

the

Man

agem

ent E

ffect

iven

ess

of A

quat

ic, C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

s (E

-KKP

3K)

ix

ixTAbLE Of CONTENTS

Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................Remarks .........................................................................................................................foreword ........................................................................................................................Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................List of figure ..................................................................................................................List of Table ....................................................................................................................

Chapter 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................... A. Background .......................................................................................................... B. Purpose and Objectives ....................................................................................... C. Scope ................................................................................................................... D. Organization of the Technical Guidelines ............................................................. List of Abbreviations and Terms ...............................................................................

Chapter II – Theoretical framework ............................................................................. A. Background .......................................................................................................... B. Literature Background to the Development of the Technical Guidelines .............. C. Legal Basis ...........................................................................................................

Chapter III – Method for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas .......................................................... A. General ................................................................................................................ B. Implementer ......................................................................................................... C. Timing ................................................................................................................... D. Evaluation Tools and Methods .............................................................................

Chapter IV – Reporting .................................................................................................. A. Evaluation data Collected .................................................................................... B. Analysis ................................................................................................................ C. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... D. Report Structure ...................................................................................................

Chapter V – Recommendations and follow Up Action .............................................. A. Recommendations ............................................................................................... B. Follow Up Action ..................................................................................................

Chapter V – Conclusion ................................................................................................

Appendix: List of Score Cards for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas ........................................... A. Background Information of the Conservation Area .............................................. B. Evaluation Score Cards: • Red (Level 1): Conservation Area Initiated ...................................................... • Yellow (Level 2): Conservation Area Established ............................................ • Green (Level 3): Conservation Area Managed Minimally ................................ • Blue (Level 4): Conservation Area Managed Optimally ................................... • Gold (Level 5): Self-Reliant Conservation Area ...............................................

References ......................................................................................................................

LIST Of fIGURES

Title

The basic principles of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas .................................................

Steps in evaluating management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area ...............................................................................

LIST Of TAbLES

Title

Status of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas in Indonesia (per July 2012) ................................................................................

Strategies and Activity Programs included in the governance, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects of the management of a conservation area ........................................................................................

Criteria used for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas at the macro level ....................

Recommended structure of a report on the findings of an evaluation of the management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area ......

Page

8

32

Page

2

4

6

36

Number

1

2

Number

1

2

3

4

Pageiiiivv

viiiixix

113345

6678

1010101011

3535353536

373737

38

3940

4145495260

61

x Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

xTe

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

xi

xiDECREE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

NUMBER KEP.44/KP3K/2012

CONCERNING

TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

CONSERVATION AREAS (E-KKP3K)

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

Considering: a. that for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of the sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas, technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas are required, using the indicators as established;

b. that this should be established by Decree of the Director General;In view of: 1. Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law

45/2009 concerning Amendments to Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries;

2. Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments as amended by Law 12/2008 concerning Amendments to Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments;

3. Law 26/2007 concerning Spatial Planning; 4. Law 27/2007 concerning Management of Coasts and Small

Islands; 5. Government Regulation 60/2007 concerning Conservation of Fish

Resources; 6. Government Regulation 62/2010 concerning Use of Outermost

Small Islands; 7. Government Regulation 64/2010 concerning Disaster Mitigation

in Coasts and Small Islands; 8. Presidential Regulation 47/2009 concerning the Formation and

Organization of State Ministries as amended by Presidential Regulation 91/2011 concerning the Third Amendment to Presidential Regulation 47/2009 concerning the Formation and Organization of State Ministries;

9. Presidential Regulation 5/2010 concerning 2010-2014 Medium-Term National Development Plan;

10. Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel as amended by Government Regulation 92/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel;

11. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands;

12. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning the Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas;

13. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning the Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.

14. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.15/MEN/2012 concerning the 2010-2014 Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;

15. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Decree Number KEP.24/MEN/2002 concerning Procedure and Process for Legal Drafting within the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;

DECREES:To enact : DECREE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE,

COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONCERNING TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS.

FIRST : To enact Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, hereinafter referred to as the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as set forth in the Appendix to this Decree of the Director General.

SECOND : The E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as referred to in the FIRST paragraph are used as guidelines for evaluating the effectiveness of the sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas using the indicators as established.

THIRD : The indicators established in the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as referred to in the SECOND paragraph consist of 5 (five) levels and 17 (seventeen) criteria, as follows:

xii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

xii

Tech

nica

l Gui

delin

es fo

r Eva

luat

ing

the

Man

agem

ent E

ffect

iven

ess

of A

quat

ic, C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

s (E

-KKP

3K)

xiii

xiiiFIFTH : This Decree of the Director General comes into force on the date

of its enactment.

Enacted in Jakarta On 9th October 2012

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

Signed

SUDIRMAN SAAD

Deemed a true copy of the originalHead of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations Bureau

Achmad Satiri

FOURTH : Costs arising as a result of the enactment of this Decree of the Director General shall be borne by the Budget of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, and other official, non-binding funding sources.

3

THIRD : The indicators established in the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as

referred to in the SECOND paragraph consist of 5 (five) levels and 17 (seventeen) criteria, as follows:

Level/Stage Criteria Number of Questions

Red (1)

Conservation Area Initiated

1 Initiative proposal

8 2 Area identification and

inventory 3 Reservation of

conservation area

Yellow (2)

Conservation Area Established

4 Management organizational unit and personnel

11

5 Management and zoning plans

6 Facilities and infrastructure to support management

7 Management funding support

Green (3)

Conservation Area Managed Minimally

8 Approval of management and zoning plans

21 9 Management standard

operating procedures (SOPs)

10 Implementation of management and zoning plans

11 Designation of Aquatic Conservation Area

Blue (4)

Conservation Area Managed Optimally

12 Boundary marking

28 13 Institutionalization 14 Resource management 15 Socio-economic and

cultural management

Gold (5)

Self-Reliant Conservation Area

16 Improving community welfare

6

17 Sustainable funding

FOURTH : Costs arising as a result of the enactment of this Decree of the Director General shall be borne by the Budget of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, and other official, non-binding funding sources.

xiv Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

xiv

Tech

nica

l Gui

delin

es fo

r Eva

luat

ing

the

Man

agem

ent E

ffect

iven

ess

of A

quat

ic, C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

s (E

-KKP

3K)

1

1

5

Appendix I: Decree of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Number KEP.44/KP3K/2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K).

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background

Indonesia, as one of the largest archipelagos in the world, is blessed with a very

rich marine biodiversity. Recent studies indicate that more than 90 percent of the world’s coral species are found, and some only found, in our waters. Likewise, more than two-thirds of the world’s fish species are found, and some only found, in Indonesian waters.

If managed sustainably, this rich marine biodiversity could provide the renewable resources needed to support the country’s long-term economic development. Unfortunately, their use is far from optimal, and most marine environments and resources are simply exploited, with little or nothing done to conserve them to ensure they can be used sustainably in the long term. Aware of this, the government of the Republic of Indonesia intends to set aside a part of its marine area for conservation purposes.

At an international forum of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP CBD) in March 2006 in Brazil, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said that the Indonesian government had committed to developing 10 million hectare of marine conservation area by 2010, and had committed to expand that area to 20 million hectares by 2020 (UNEP-WCMC, 2008). This declaration and commitment requires multi-stakeholder support because establishing and managing conservation areas should offer benefits that support sustainable fisheries, for the good of the welfare of communities, in particular marine and fishing communities, most of which fall within the category of poor communities. This expansion does not just mean expanding geographical area. Consistent related efforts are needed to create marine conservation areas that are managed effectively in order to conserve biodiversity and contribute to the welfare of local communities.

Conservation is a challenge and a necessity, as part of the effort to balance the economic needs of the community and the wish to conserve existing resources for the future. As of July 2012, marine conservation areas in Indonesia covered a total of 15.78 million hectares (Table 1). This figure exceeds the target of 15.5 million hectares of conservation area set in the 2010-2014 National Medium-Term Development Plan.

2 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)

2Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

3

3

6

Table 1 – Status of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas in

Indonesia (per July 2012)

No. Category Total Area (ha) A Ministry of Forestry Initiated 32 4,694,947.55 1 Marine National Park 7 4,043,541.30 2 Marine Natural Tourism Park 14 491,248.00 3 Marine Wildlife Reserve 5 5,678.25 4 Marine Nature Reserve 6 154,480.00

B Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Initiated 76 11,089,181.97

1 Aquatic National Park 1 3,521,130.01 2 Aquatic Nature Reserve 3 445,630.00 3 Aquatic Tourism Park 6 1,541,040.20 4 Aquatic Conservation Area (Regional) 66 5,581,382.76 Total 108 15,784,129.52

To support the above initiative, sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas has been made a part of two national strategic targets. First, sustainable conservation has been made one of the key performance indicators for marine and fisheries development. Second, sustainable conservation has been made a priority target of the Millennium Development Goals to help support fair development, as referred to in Presidential Instruction 3/2010 concerning Fair Development.

The indicators for sustainable management of marine conservation areas are interpreted to mean management that pays heed to principles of utilization and management that guarantee availability and sustainability though the continuous maintenance and improvement of the quality and biodiversity of existing resources. To measure sustainable management, indicators of the achievement of conservation area management have been established. The parameters used is the decree that reserves the area, management agencies, management plans, institutional strengthening (partners, networks and human resources), and management initiatives, management infrastructure and facilities. Management effectiveness is categorized into five stages, based on the above parameters: stage 1 (red) – the area has been reserved; stage 2 (yellow) – stage 1 + management agency formed; stage 3 (green) – stage 2 + institutional strengthening, infrastructure and core management; stage 4 (blue) – stage 3 + optimal management of conservation area; and stage 5 (gold) – stage 4 + sustainable funding mechanism (decree, contribution from non-governmental organizations).

These guidelines were developed as a manual to evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable management of individual conservation areas, using the established management indicators.

7

B. Purpose and Objectives

The purpose of developing these technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas is to produce a standard for evaluating the achievement of the sustainable management of a particular conservation area, as referred to in the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulations Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands, Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas, and Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.

The objectives of the Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas are as follows: (1) To provide an instrument that can be used by policy makers at the national level

to evaluate the performance of all aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and to set priorities for the effective management of these areas;

(2) To provide an instrument that can be used by managers and stakeholders for planning activities to improve management performance; and

(3) To provide an instrument that can be used by managers and stakeholders for evaluating the performance or level of management of a particular area.

C. Scope

The scope of these Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management

Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas includes national (macro) evaluation and site (micro) evaluation. The materials covered by the evaluation include management, conservation/resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects that are relevant to management of conservation areas. Some relevant examples are shown in Table 2.


4Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

5

5

8

Table 2 – Strategies and Activity Programs included in the governance, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects of the management of a conservation area

Aspect Strategies and Activity Programs

Management Human resource development Institutional management Infrastructure capacity building Development of community organizations/institutions

Development of partnerships Establishing an aquatic conservation area network Developing a sustainable funding system Monitoring and evaluation

Area resources Protecting fish habitats and populations Rehabilitating fish habitats and populations Research and development Use of fish resources Eco tourism and environmental services Surveillance and control Monitoring and evaluation

Socio-economic & cultural

Community socio-economic development Community empowerment Preservation of culture and traditions Monitoring and evaluation

D. Organization of the Technical Guidelines

This manual for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and

small islands conservation areas contains procedures or standards for evaluating the performance of the sustainable management of a particular aquatic conservation area. Following is an outline of the content of each chapter: Chapter I – Introduction, including background, purpose and objectives, scope,

and organization of the technical guidelines. Chapter II – Theoretical framework for Effectiveness of the Management of

Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, including an overview of the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas, which will act as the benchmark for the management, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects, and implementation of the management of an aquatic conservation area by a management organization unit (national or local government) as a form of social responsibility to the public.

Chapter III – Method for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic,

Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, which is a process for determining the effectiveness (outcomes) and impacts of activity programs against targets that will be achieved systematically and objectively. This evaluation seeks to explain why the outcomes, effects and impacts of activities are achieved or not. And whether the activities are effective, as targeted.

9

Chapter IV – Reporting, or the findings of the evaluation of the management

effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas based on the data collected and analyzed, and follow-up recommendations for the management of conservation areas. Reporting is done periodically and at various levels, or as needed.

Chapter V – Recommendations and Follow Up, contains the recommendations

and follow up for managers to implement in order to achieve an effective level of management.

Chapter VI – Conclusion.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS

Below are some of the common abbreviations and terms used in these guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas: E-KKP3K: Efektivitas Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi Perairan, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil (Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas)

Evaluation: a process for determining the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and impacts of program activities against targets that are to be achieved systematically and objectively. This evaluation seeks to explain why the outputs, effects and impacts of activities are achieved or not.

Reporting: a key activity in development processes. Reporting is done to provide relevant and accurate data/information quickly to stakeholders as material for decision making in keeping with existing conditions, and for making relevant policies. Reporting is carried out regularly and at various levels.

Level Red: or stage 1 (conservation area initiated), and the area has been reserved by decree.

Level Yellow: or stage 2 (conservation area established) – stage 1 + management agency formed and management plan prepared.

Level Green: or stage 3 (conservation area managed minimally) – stage 2 + organizational strengthening and core management activities.

Level Blue: or stage 4 (conservation area managed optimally) – stage 3 + management of the conservation area running effectively.

Level Gold: or stage 5 (self-reliant conservation area) – stage 4 + sustainable funding mechanism (by decree, contributions from non-governmental organizations).

IKU KKP: Indikator Kinerja Utama Pembangunan Kelautan dan Perikanan (Marine and Fisheries Development Key Performance Indicators)


6Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

7

7

10

CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A. Background

Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation

Areas or E-KKP3K is a method of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas that indicates the level or degree to which management of a conservation area has had a positive impact on the area’s biophysical resources and on the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local community, which contributes to improving management performance.

On this basis, therefore, all management activities carried out, as well as having their own targets, must also have conservation and socio-economic and cultural targets, the achievement or outcomes of which are a logical consequence of an effective management activity.

E-KKP3K tools can be used to conduct an evaluation of the management effectiveness of conservation areas, including aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia. At the macro level, E-KKP3K tools are used by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries to get a spatial view of the overall management effectiveness of all aquatic conservation areas in Indonesia; while at the micro level, these tools are used to self-evaluate the effectiveness of the management of a particular aquatic conservation area and to make plans to improve its management performance. Table 3 – Criteria used for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic,

coasts and small islands conservation areas at the macro level

Level/Stage Criteria Number of Questions

Red (1)

Conservation Area Initiated

1. Initiative proposal

8 2. Area identification and inventory

3. Reservation of conservation area

Yellow (2)

Conservation Area Established

4. Management organizational unit and personnel

11 5. Management and zoning plans

6. Facilities and infrastructure to support management

7. Management funding support

Green (3)

Conservation Area Managed Minimally

8. Approval of management and zoning plans

21 9.

Management standard operating procedures (SOPs)

10. Implementation of management and zoning plans

11. Designation of Aquatic Conservation Area

Blue (4)

Conservation Area Managed Optimally

12. Setting area markers

28 13. Institutionalization 14. Resource management

15. Socio-economic and cultural management

Gold (5)

Self-Reliant Conservation Area

16. Improving community welfare 6

17. Sustainable financing

11

B. Literature Background to the Development of the Technical Guidelines

Conceptually, the development of these technical guidelines was based on

available literature (Hockings et al., 2000, 2006; Pomeroy et al., 2004; Staub & Hatziolos, 2004; White et al., 2006; Carter et al., 2010), in which evaluation of management effectiveness is seen as a way of evaluating one or several activities related to the management cycle of a conservation area, i.e. an overall evaluation of the inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and impacts. Also, all stages of the development of these technical guidelines made reference to the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulations Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning the Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas, Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans, and Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands. Based on analysis of these regulations, in general the stages of effective management of conservation areas are: (1) Conservation area is initiated; (2) Conservation area is established; (3) Conservation area is managed minimally; (4) Conservation area is managed optimally; and (5) Conservation area is managed effectively and is fully functional (self-reliant)

The combination of the above explains why there is little difference in the level of management between the proposed, which reflect more the maturity stage of a conservation area than an evaluation of the performance of each component in the management cycle, although in principle, the theoretical framework used does refer to Hockings et al. (2000, 2006). As will become apparent in the succeeding sub-chapters, use of this approach does make it easier to evaluate the progress towards effective management. Also, this ranking also roughly reflects the chronology of the management cycle. According to Kapos et al. (2008, 2009), management effectiveness can be equated with the outcomes of management intervention, which means that a conservation area will be deemed not effective as long the processes undertaken are limited to inputs, processes and outputs.

In the management of a conservation area, three interconnected principles must be considered: the area resources, the local socio-economic and cultural aspects, and the management aspect itself. These principles are shown in Figure 1.


8Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

9

9

12

Figure 1 – The basic principles of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas

In their use, E-KKP3K tools adopt the principles as defined above, whereby the area resources and the local socio-economic and cultural aspects are a function of management. Thus, management initiatives and their effectiveness are a precondition for achieving the outcomes and impacts on the area resources and the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local community, which means to be effective, management must be verified by these other two aspects. For example, enforcing the rules of a conservation area is a management activity, the effectiveness of which is indicated by an improvement in the condition of the area resources and reduced pressure on these resources as a result of positive support to the management of the area. Furthermore, there should be positive interconnection and verification between the area resources and socio-economic and cultural aspects as a further indicator of the effectiveness of the management of a conservation area.

C. Legal Basis

Law 5/1990 concerning Conservation of Biological Resources and their Ecosystems. Law 5/1994 concerning Ratification of the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity.

Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law 45/2009 concerning Amendments to Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries.

Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments as amended by Law 12/2008 concerning Amendments to Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments.

Law 26/2007 concerning Spatial Planning. Law 27/2007 concerning Management of Coasts and Small Islands Areas. Government Regulation 39/2006 concerning Procedures for Monitoring and Evaluating Implementation of Development Plans.

Government Regulation 60/2007 concerning Conservation of Fish Resources.

Management

Social-economic & culturalArea resources

13

Government Regulation 26/2008 concerning Spatial Plans for National Areas. Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel as amended by Government Regulation 92/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel.

Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands.

Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 23/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation 22/2008 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of Technical Implementing Units for the Management of Coasts and Marine Resources.

Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas.

Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.15/MEN/2010 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries.

Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.

Convention of Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties to Decision X/31 on Protected Areas (Nagoya, 18-29 October 2010), Point B. Issues that need greater attention, Article 3 (Management Effectiveness) and Article 5 (marine protected areas, MPAs).


10Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

11

11

14

CHAPTER III

METHOD OF EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS

A. General

The E-KKP3K technical guidelines are used not only for the evaluation of

management performance, but also for self-evaluation, to generate constructive input for conservation area planning in order to improve management effectiveness.

B. Implementer

Evaluations using the E-KKP3K technical guidelines are carried out by a team of evaluators, with members as required. This team can consist of: 1. National government; 2. Local government; and 3. Independent evaluators.

At the macro level, the evaluation team is appointed by government based on their key tasks and functions. At the micro level, the evaluation team will depend on needs: (1) for internal and planning needs, and (2) for external needs with the participation of stakeholders.

For internal and planning needs, all team members come from the conservation area concerned, and include the head and management of the area and the planners. For external needs, the stakeholders in the evaluation team include representatives of the conservation area management team (for example the head and planners), and direct stakeholders such as representatives of fishers, tourism businesses, private companies, and universities. If necessary, the conservation area management team may appoint an independent team to conduct the evaluation.

C. Timing

Based on the fact that E-KKP3K tools are used to evaluate the stage and level of management, evaluations should be performed periodically over a set period of time. These evaluations are useful for planning to improve the management performance of a conservation area, so that each process at each stage of E-KKP3K management can be quickly achieved.

For management levels 1 (red) and 2 (yellow), annual evaluations until all processes at management level 2 (yellow) have been completed are recommended. For levels 3 (green) and 4 (blue), evaluations can be performed once every two to four years, with evaluations every two years strongly recommended to promote completion of all processes at level 3 (green) and/or some of the processes at level 4 (blue). For management level 5 (gold), evaluations every five years are recommended.

15

D. Evaluation Tools and Methods D1: Evaluation Tools

The E-KKP3K technical guidelines are a tool designed to evaluate the

performance and the management effectiveness of conservation areas in terms of their expected outcomes on institutional, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects. The evaluations are performed with the help of software to measure and determine the stage or level of management of a conservation area. Supplementing this software is a manual and appendices that can be used by the team conducting the evaluation. The software automatically calculates the management stage of a conservation area. The criteria are explained towards the end of the following section (D2: Evaluation Method). It should be emphasized that the software can be used only when all the data and information collection steps as described in D2: Evaluation Method have been completed. This is because the final result – the management stage or level – obtained by using the software must be accompanied by recommendations to improve management performance. An explanation/description of each stage in the E-KKP3K technical guidelines is presented in pages 16 to 35 of this document.


12Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

13

1316

Des

crip

tion

of

each

leve

l/st

age

Le

vel

Stag

e

Red

1:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea

Initi

ated

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

1:

Init

iati

ve

prop

osal

Prop

osal

to

initi

ate

esta

blis

hmen

t of

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

subm

itted

by

(sel

ect

one)

L

ist

of p

ropo

sers

, if

mor

e th

an

one.

U

ser

mus

t at

tach

initi

ativ

e pr

opos

al d

ocum

ents

as

refe

rred

to

in A

rtic

le 9

cla

use

(2)

of t

he

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r is

as

ked

to c

hoos

e on

e fr

om a

list

of

prop

oser

s.

Whe

re t

here

is m

ore

than

one

pro

pose

r, ju

st

sele

ct t

he m

ain

prop

oser

and

list

the

ot

her

prop

oser

s in

the

ve

rific

atio

n co

lum

n. I

n ca

ses

whe

re t

he a

rea

has

alre

ady

been

id

entif

ied/

res

erve

d, t

he

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is t

aken

to

be ‘Y

es’.

M1

Indi

vidu

al

Com

mun

ity g

roup

Res

earc

h in

stitu

te

Educ

atio

nal i

nstit

ute

Gov

ernm

ent

orga

niza

tion

NG

O

17

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

1:

Init

iati

ve

prop

osal

Prop

osal

to

initi

ate

esta

blis

hmen

t of

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

is s

ubm

itted

to:

(se

lect

one

) D

ocum

ents

as

refe

rred

to

in

Artic

le 1

1 cl

ause

(2)

of

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r se

lect

s ‘Y

es’ t

o an

swer

this

ques

tion

if th

e pr

opos

al is

as

refe

rred

to in

Artic

le 1

1 cla

uses

(1)

and

(2)

of t

he

Min

ister

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

an

d Fi

sher

ies

Regu

latio

n Num

ber 0

2/20

09. U

ser

mus

t sel

ect ‘

No’

for

ques

tion

M2b

. In

case

s w

here

the

area

has

al

read

y be

en id

entif

ied/

re

serv

ed, t

he a

nsw

er to

th

is qu

estio

n is

take

n to

be

‘Yes

’.

M2a

Nat

iona

l gov

ernm

ent

or lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent

with

out

prel

imin

ary

surv

ey a

nd m

ap.

M2b

N

atio

nal g

over

nmen

t or

loca

l go

vern

men

t w

ith p

relim

inar

y su

rvey

and

map

.

Doc

umen

ts a

s re

ferr

ed t

o in

Ar

ticle

10

of t

he M

inis

ter

of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r se

lect

s ‘Y

es’ t

o an

swer

this

ques

tion

if th

e pr

opos

al is

as

refe

rred

to in

Artic

le 1

0 cla

uses

(1)

, (2)

and

(3)

of

the

Min

ister

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tion

Num

ber

02/2

009.

Use

r mus

t sel

ect

‘No’

for qu

estio

n M

2a. I

n ca

ses

whe

re th

e ar

ea h

as

alre

ady

been

iden

tifie

d/

rese

rved

, the

ans

wer

to

this

ques

tion

is ta

ken

to b

e ‘Y

es’.


14Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

15

1518

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

2. A

rea

iden

tifi

cati

on

and

inve

ntor

y

M3

Has

a s

urve

y an

d ev

alua

tion

of th

e pr

opos

ed a

rea

been

car

ried

out p

ursu

ant

to th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tions

Num

ber

PER.

02/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.

17/M

EN/2

008?

Stud

y re

port

s pu

rsua

nt to

the

Min

ister

of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns

Num

ber P

ER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.

17/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M4

Has

soc

ializ

atio

n of

the

prop

osed

are

a be

en c

arrie

d ou

t pur

suan

t to

the

Min

ister

of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns N

umbe

r PER

.02/

MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PER

.17/

MEN

/200

8?

Socia

lizat

ion

repo

rts

purs

uant

to th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns N

umbe

r PER

.02/

MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PER

.17/

MEN

/200

8.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M5

Hav

e pu

blic c

onsu

ltatio

ns re

gard

ing

the

prop

osed

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out p

ursu

ant t

o th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns

Num

ber P

ER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.

17/M

EN/2

008?

Publ

ic co

nsul

tatio

n re

port

s pu

rsua

nt to

the

Min

ister

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tions

Num

ber P

ER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or P

ER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M6

Has

coo

rdin

atio

n w

ith rel

evan

t go

vern

men

t age

ncie

s re

gard

ing

the

prop

osed

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out p

ursu

ant t

o th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns

Num

ber P

ER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.

17/M

EN/2

008?

Coor

dina

tion

repo

rts

purs

uant

to th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

ns N

umbe

r PER

.02/

MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PER

.17/

MEN

/200

8.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M7

Hav

e th

e re

sults

of i

dent

ifica

tion

and

inve

ntor

y be

en u

sed

to re

com

men

d th

e pr

opos

ed c

onse

rvat

ion

area

pur

suan

t to

the

Min

ister

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Regu

latio

ns N

umbe

r PE

R.02

/MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PE

R.17

/MEN

/200

8?

Reco

mm

enda

tion

for t

he p

ropo

sed

cons

erva

tion

area

pur

suan

t to

Artic

le 1

9 of

th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

n Nu

mbe

r PER

.02/

MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

Art

icle

15

of R

egul

atio

n N

umbe

r PE

R.17

/MEN

/200

8.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

19

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

3. R

eser

vati

on

of

con

serv

atio

n

area

M8a

H

as t

he a

rea

been

res

erve

d,

but

not

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Dec

ree/

regu

latio

n, t

hat

will

nee

d to

be

revi

sed

acco

rdin

gly

(ref

er t

o Ar

ticle

20

clau

se (

2) o

f th

e M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

02/2

009)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Are

as

are

gene

rally

res

erve

d by

dec

ree/

regu

latio

n.

M8b

H

as t

he a

rea

been

res

erve

d,

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fis

herie

s Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Dec

ree/

regu

latio

n re

serv

ing

the

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. A

reas

ar

e ge

nera

lly r

eser

ved

by d

ecre

e/re

gula

tion.

To

tal n

umbe

r of

‘Yes

’ ans

wer

s

Perc

enta

ge


16Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

17

1720

Leve

l St

age

Yel

low

2:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea

Esta

blis

hed

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niza

tion

al

unit

an

d pe

rson

nel

K9

Are

ther

e co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l in

plac

e?

Org

aniz

atio

nal s

truc

ture

and

/or m

ain

task

s &

func

tions

doc

umen

t. Pe

ople

/indi

vidu

als

or a

n or

gani

zatio

n w

ith th

e fu

nctio

n an

d ta

sk o

f m

anag

ing

the

area

. For

ex

ampl

e: res

pons

ibilit

y fo

r m

anag

ing

the

cons

erva

tion

area

is a

par

t of

the

job

desc

riptio

n of

th

e Co

asts

and

Sm

all

Isla

nds

Mon

itorin

g Se

ctio

n.

K10

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve

the

pers

onne

l app

oint

ed b

y de

cree

?

Dec

ree

of th

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

t he

ad/

min

iste

r/un

it he

ad.

Org

aniz

atio

nal s

truc

ture

and

/or

mai

n ta

sks

& fu

nctio

ns d

ocum

ent.

Peop

le/in

divi

dual

s or

or

gani

zatio

n ap

poin

ted

and

dete

rmin

ed b

y D

ecre

e.

K11

Is t

here

an

adeq

uate

num

ber

of

pers

onne

l in

the

man

agem

ent

unit

to r

un t

he o

rgan

izat

ion?

Org

aniz

atio

nal

stru

ctur

e an

d/or

m

ain

task

s &

func

tions

doc

umen

t M

anag

ers

job

desc

riptio

ns.

An a

dequ

ate

num

ber o

f pe

rson

nel t

o ex

ecut

e th

e m

ain

task

s &

func

tions

of

the

orga

niza

tion

as p

er

gove

rnm

ent m

inim

um

stan

dard

. K1

2 H

ave

the

man

ager

s ha

d ba

sic

cons

erva

tion

trai

ning

?

Tr

aini

ng re

port

s or

cer

tific

ates

or

othe

r pr

oof.

Take

n pa

rt in

at l

east

one

trai

ning

cou

rse

appr

opria

te

to m

ain

task

s &

func

tions

, su

ch a

s M

PA 1

01, f

ish

reso

urce

s co

nser

vatio

n trai

ning

, div

ing

and

mon

itorin

g tr

aini

ng, e

tc. 21

Le

vel Y

ELLO

W:

stag

e 2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

5.

Man

agem

ent

and

zon

ing

plan

s

K13

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of t

he m

anag

emen

t pl

an?

No

man

agem

ent

plan

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If th

e an

swer

is ‘Y

es’,

do n

ot

com

plet

e th

e ta

ble

for

crite

ria 5

(m

anag

emen

t and

zo

ning

pla

ns).

M

anag

emen

t pl

an b

eing

dra

fted

.

D

raft

man

agem

ent

plan

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. If

the

answ

er is

‘Yes

’, an

swer

‘No’

fo

r the

oth

er q

uest

ions

in K

13.

Man

agem

ent

plan

fin

aliz

ed.

Fin

aliz

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an.

Doc

umen

t si

gned

by

the

head

of

the

man

agem

ent

unit.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If th

e an

swer

is ‘Y

es’,

answ

er ‘N

o’

for t

he o

ther

que

stio

ns in

K1

3. T

he m

anag

emen

t do

cum

ent h

as b

een

final

ized

and

subm

itted

for

appr

oval

. The

dra

fting

ph

ases

of t

he m

anag

emen

t do

cum

ent a

re p

er A

rticl

e 30

of

Reg

ulat

ion

of th

e M

inist

er

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

30/2

010.

5

. M

anag

emen

t an

d zo

nin

g pl

ans

K14

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t pla

n co

ntai

n re

sour

ces

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic a

nd

cultu

ral i

nfor

mat

ion

that

can

be

used

as

bas

elin

e da

ta (

t 0)?

M

anag

emen

t pl

an:

man

agem

ent

plan

mat

rix/

sum

mar

y,

cont

aini

ng in

form

atio

n ab

out

reso

urce

s –

base

line

data

.

O

ther

sup

port

ing

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

In

form

atio

n ab

out

reso

urce

s an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

and

cultu

ral

cond

ition

s in

eac

h co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea, s

uch

as

cora

l ree

f cov

erag

e, ta

rget

fis

h ab

unda

nce,

loca

l co

mm

unity

per

cept

ions

, fis

hers

’ inc

omes

, etc

.


18Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

19

1922

Leve

l YEL

LOW

: st

age

2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

6. F

acili

ties

an

d in

fras

truc

ture

to

sup

port

m

anag

emen

t

K15

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve

offic

es?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

K16

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve

an in

form

atio

n bo

ard?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. A

n in

form

atio

n bo

ard

that

ex

plai

ns a

t a

min

imum

the

bo

unda

ries

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

, and

its

zoni

ng s

yste

m a

nd w

hat

activ

ities

are

pe

rmitt

ed/n

ot p

erm

itted

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

. K1

7 D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

inim

um o

ffic

e eq

uipm

ent?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. T

he

min

imum

of

equi

pmen

t th

at e

nabl

es t

he

orga

niza

tion

to f

unct

ion,

su

ch a

s fu

rnitu

re, d

ata

proc

essi

ng t

ools

, co

mm

unic

atio

n to

ols.

K1

8 D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

anag

emen

t fa

cilit

ies

(mon

itorin

g to

ols,

co

mm

unic

atio

n to

ols)

?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

23

Leve

l YEL

LOW

: st

age

2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

7.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

K19

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t?

No

man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If

the

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is ‘Y

es’,

the

answ

er t

o th

e ot

her

ques

tion

in

K19

is ‘N

o’.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort,

bu

t no

t re

liant

(en

ough

to

oper

ate

offic

e).

Man

agem

ent

unit

finan

cial

re

port

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If

the

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is ‘Y

es’,

the

answ

er t

o th

e ot

her

ques

tion

in

K19

is ‘N

o’.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Pe

rcen

tage


20Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

21

2124

Leve

l St

age

Gre

en

3: C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

Man

aged

Min

imal

ly

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niz

atio

nal

un

it a

nd

pers

onne

l

H20

Ar

e th

ere

suffi

cien

t per

sonn

el in

th

e m

anag

emen

t uni

t to

exec

ute

the

man

agem

ent f

unct

ions

(s

urve

illan

ce, r

esou

rce

mon

itorin

g, s

ocio

-eco

nom

ic &

cu

ltura

l mon

itorin

g)?

Doc

umen

ts a

nd/o

r re

port

s re

late

d to

the

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l fun

ctio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H21

D

o pe

rson

nel i

n th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve q

ualif

icat

ions

in a

t le

ast t

wo

of th

e fo

llow

ing

requ

ired

man

agem

ent c

ompe

tenc

ies

(pla

nnin

g, m

onito

ring

&

eval

uatio

n, s

urve

illan

ce, r

esea

rch,

re

sour

ce a

nd s

ocio

-eco

nom

ic a

nd

cultu

ral m

onito

ring)

?

Cert

ifica

tes

of c

ompe

tenc

y.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H22

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t un

it in

itiat

ed p

artn

ersh

ips

with

st

akeh

olde

rs?

Stak

ehol

der

com

mun

icat

ion

repo

rts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

5. F

acili

ties

an

d in

fras

truc

ture

to

sup

port

m

anag

emen

t

H23

D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

offic

e ha

ve a

dequ

ate

offic

e eq

uipm

ent?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H24

D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

anag

emen

t su

ppor

ting

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

?

Rep

orts

(on

sur

veill

ance

eq

uipm

ent, r

esou

rce

mon

itorin

g eq

uipm

ent, c

omm

unic

atio

n/

soci

aliz

atio

n to

ols

and

othe

r fa

cilit

ies,

bou

ndar

y m

arke

rs)

and

phys

ical

che

cks.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

25

Leve

l GR

EEN

: st

age

3 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea m

anag

ed m

inim

ally

(co

ntin

ued)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

6.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

H25

H

as a

man

agem

ent

fund

ing

plan

be

en p

repa

red?

St

rate

gy d

ocum

ents

and

fun

ding

pl

ans.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H26

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t uni

t se

cure

d m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t fr

om t

he lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent b

udge

t / c

entr

al

gove

rnm

ent

budg

et?

Man

agem

ent

unit

finan

ce r

epor

ts

that

mee

t st

anda

rds

appl

icab

le in

In

done

sia

& a

nnua

l wor

k pl

an.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H27

H

ave

plan

s be

en m

ade

to s

ecur

e fu

ndin

g fo

r m

anag

emen

t of

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea?

Alte

rnat

ive

budg

et p

ropo

sal

docu

men

ts, l

ette

rs o

f ap

plic

atio

n,

prop

osal

s an

d ot

her

docu

men

tatio

n.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

8. A

ppro

val o

f m

anag

emen

t an

d zo

nin

g pl

ans

H28

H

as t

he fi

naliz

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an b

een

subm

itted

for

appr

oval

?

Prop

osal

doc

umen

ts a

nd p

ropo

sal

rece

ipt.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H29

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t pla

n be

en

appr

oved

?

D

ecre

e ap

prov

ing

the

man

agem

ent

plan

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

9.

Man

agem

ent

stan

dard

op

erat

ing

proc

edur

es

(SO

Ps)

H30

Ar

e th

ere

SOPs

for

offic

e ad

min

istr

atio

n an

d fin

anci

al

man

agem

ent?

SOP

docu

men

ts. P

leas

e st

ate.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H31

Ar

e th

ere

SOPs

for

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

(m

inim

um

stan

dard

s)?

SOP

docu

men

ts o

n fa

cilit

ies

and

infr

astr

uctu

re

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H32

Ar

e th

ere

man

agem

ent

SOPs

(fo

r in

stitu

tiona

l str

engt

heni

ng, j

oint

pa

trol

s, r

esou

rce

man

agem

ent,

an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

& c

ultu

ral

stre

ngth

enin

g) th

at m

eet

the

min

imum

sta

ndar

ds?

SOP

docu

men

ts. P

leas

e st

ate.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.


22Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

23

2326

Leve

l GR

EEN

: st

age

3 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea m

anag

ed m

inim

ally

(co

ntin

ued)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

10

. Im

plem

enta

tio

n of

m

anag

emen

t an

d zo

nin

g pl

ans

H33

H

as t

he in

stitu

tiona

l st

reng

then

ing

stra

tegy

bee

n im

plem

ente

d?

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H34

H

as a

bas

elin

e su

rvey

of

reso

urce

s be

en c

ondu

cted

?

M

anag

emen

t pl

an a

nd/o

r su

rvey

re

port

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H35

H

as t

he r

esou

rce

man

agem

ent

stre

ngth

enin

g st

rate

gy b

een

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H36

H

as a

soc

io-e

cono

mic

and

cu

ltura

l bas

elin

e su

rvey

bee

n co

nduc

ted?

Man

agem

ent

plan

and

/or

surv

ey

repo

rts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H37

H

as a

soc

io-e

cono

mic

and

cu

ltura

l str

engt

heni

ng s

trat

egy

been

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H38

Ar

e th

ere

initi

ativ

es t

o m

ake

use

of t

he a

rea

(at

leas

t on

e?)

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

11

. D

esig

nati

on o

f A

quat

ic

Con

serv

atio

n

Are

a

H39

H

as t

he p

ropo

sal f

or

desi

gnat

ion

been

sub

mitt

ed t

o th

e M

inis

ter

for

Mar

ine

Affa

irs

and

Fish

erie

s?

Prop

osal

doc

umen

ts a

nd r

ecei

pt

of s

ubm

issi

on o

f do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H40

H

as t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

bee

n de

sign

ated

by

the

Min

iste

r of

M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fis

herie

s?

Dec

ree

of t

he M

inis

ter.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge

27

Leve

l St

age

Blu

e 4:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea M

anag

ed O

ptim

ally

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niz

atio

nal

un

it a

nd

pers

onne

l

B41

Do

pers

onne

l in

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

qu

alifi

catio

ns in

the

req

uire

d m

anag

emen

t co

mpe

tenc

ies?

Doc

umen

ts a

nd/o

r re

port

s re

leva

nt to

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l cap

acity

(pl

anni

ng,

mon

itorin

g &

eva

luat

ion,

su

rvei

llanc

e, r

esea

rch,

res

ourc

es

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic a

nd c

ultu

ral

mon

itorin

g). T

rain

ing

cert

ifica

tes

and/

or d

iplo

mas

as

proo

f of

qual

ifica

tions

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory

5. F

acili

ties

an

d in

fras

truc

ture

to

sup

port

m

anag

emen

t

B42

Are

the

requ

ired

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

in p

lace

?

Re

port

s an

d ph

ysic

al c

heck

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory

6.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

B43

Is m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t av

aila

ble

as p

lann

ed?

Activ

ity im

plem

enta

tion

and

fund

ing

sour

ce r

epor

ts.

Res

pons

e to

thi

s qu

estio

n re

fers

to

the

budg

et

requ

irem

ent

per

ques

tion

H27

. 9

. M

anag

emen

t st

anda

rd

oper

atin

g pr

oced

ures

(S

OP

s)

B44

Are

ther

e tr

aini

ng a

nd

educ

atio

n SO

Ps in

pla

ce?

Trai

ning

and

edu

catio

n SO

P do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B45

Are

the

SOPs

on

aqua

tic

tour

ism

act

iviti

es in

pla

ce?

Eco-

tour

ism

SO

P do

cum

ents

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B46

Are

ther

e SO

Ps o

n aq

uacu

lture

in

pla

ce?

Aqua

cultu

re S

OP

docu

men

ts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B47

Are

ther

e SO

Ps o

n fis

hing

in

plac

e?

Fish

ing

SOP

docu

men

ts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.


24Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

25

2528

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

11

. D

esig

nati

on o

f A

quat

ic

Con

serv

atio

n

Are

a

B48

Has

des

igna

tion

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

bee

n pu

blic

ized

?

Rep

orts

of

soci

aliz

atio

n ac

tiviti

es,

incl

udin

g at

tend

ance

list

s an

d ph

otog

raph

s of

act

iviti

es.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

12

. Bou

ndar

y m

arki

ng

B49

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of t

he b

ound

ary

mar

king

? -

Boun

dary

mar

king

initi

ated

.

Dec

ree

of b

ound

ary

mar

king

co

mm

ittee

as

per

Artic

le 2

4 of

the

M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Regu

latio

n N

umbe

r PE

R.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

- Bou

ndar

y m

arki

ng in

pro

gres

s.

Activ

ity r

epor

ts (

mea

surin

g, m

appi

ng

and

soci

aliz

atio

n).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

- Bo

unda

ry m

arki

ng a

ppro

ved.

N

otifi

catio

n of

bou

ndar

y m

arki

ng

esta

blis

hed

by D

ecre

e of

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs &

Fis

herie

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

B50

Hav

e pa

rtne

rshi

ps w

ith

stak

ehol

ders

bee

n ag

reed

?

Ac

tivity

coo

rdin

atio

n re

ports

, agr

eem

ents

, jo

int p

rogr

ams,

and

sim

ilar.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B51

Hav

e pa

rtne

rshi

ps w

ith s

take

hold

ers

been

impl

emen

ted?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. U

sers

sh

ould

cho

ose

one

of

the

optio

ns p

rovi

ded.

N

o

Yes

, but

inci

dent

al.

Ac

tivity

rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Pa

rtne

rshi

ps a

re

tem

pora

ry o

r in

cide

ntal

. Y

es, s

usta

inab

le

part

ners

hips

.

Ac

tivity

rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Pa

rtner

ship

s im

plem

ente

d as

pla

nned

.

29

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

B52

Has

str

engt

heni

ng o

f lo

cal

inst

itutio

ns b

een

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity

repo

rts,

te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce,

guid

ance

, tr

aini

ng,

exte

nsio

n.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B53

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of

enfo

rcem

ent

of r

ules

(m

onito

ring

& s

urve

illan

ce)

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

by

the

man

agem

ent

unit?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

Rul

es a

re n

ot e

nfor

ced.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Rul

es a

re c

onsi

sten

tly

enfo

rced

.

Reg

ulat

ion

soci

aliz

atio

n re

port

s;

info

rmat

ion

boar

ds;

surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B54

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of

com

mun

ity b

ased

sur

veill

ance

in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

N

ot d

one.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Initi

ated

and

in p

rogr

ess

(org

aniz

atio

n &

sys

tem

).

Doc

umen

ts (

repo

rts

of a

ctiv

ities

an

d fo

rmat

ion

of c

omm

unity

su

rvei

llanc

e gr

oup)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Reg

ular

sur

veill

ance

car

ried

out.

D

ocum

ents

(re

port

s of

com

mun

ity

surv

eilla

nce

activ

ities

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.


26Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

27

2730

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

B55

Is t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

entio

ned

in t

he N

atio

nal

Med

ium

-Ter

m D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

/ N

atio

nal G

over

nmen

t St

rate

gic

Plan

and

/or

the

Loca

l M

ediu

m-T

erm

Dev

elop

men

t Pl

an /

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t St

rate

gic

Plan

?

Nat

iona

l Med

ium

-Ter

m

Plan

/Nat

iona

l Gov

ernm

ent

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an;

Loca

l Med

ium

-Ter

m

Dev

elop

men

t Pl

an /

Loc

al

Gov

ernm

ent

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B56

Is t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

entio

ned

in t

he A

rea

Zoni

ng

Plan

/ C

oast

s an

d Sm

all

Isla

nds

Area

Zon

ing

Plan

?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

N

o

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

In t

he p

roce

ss o

f be

ing

brou

ght

into

line

with

the

no

men

clat

ure

of c

urre

nt

regu

latio

ns

Activ

ity d

ocum

ents

/rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

In

the

pro

cess

of

bein

g de

sign

ated

by

loca

l re

gula

tion

Activ

ity d

ocum

ents

/rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Ye

s, th

e co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea is

m

entio

ned

in th

e Ar

ea Z

onin

g Pl

an /

Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Is

land

s Ar

ea Z

onin

g Pl

an

Area

Zon

ing

Plan

/ C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds A

rea

Zoni

ng P

lan

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

31

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

14

. Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t

B57

Wha

t is

the

con

ditio

n of

fis

h re

sour

ce h

abita

ts in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B57A

H

as t

here

bee

n im

prov

emen

t to

th

e co

nditi

on o

f ha

bita

ts in

the

co

re z

one,

sus

tain

able

fis

hing

zo

ne, u

se z

one,

res

tric

ted

use

zone

, and

/or

othe

r zo

nes,

as

indi

cate

d fo

r ex

ampl

e by

an

incr

ease

in t

he c

over

age

of

cora

l ree

f ec

osys

tem

s an

d/or

se

agra

ss m

eado

w a

nd/o

r m

angr

ove

fore

st?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B57B

H

as t

here

bee

n im

prov

emen

t to

th

e co

nditi

on o

f ha

bita

ts in

the

co

re z

one,

sus

tain

able

fis

herie

s zo

ne, u

se z

one,

res

tric

ted

use

zone

, and

/or

othe

r zo

nes,

as

indi

cate

d fo

r ex

ampl

e by

an

incr

ease

in t

he a

rea

of c

oral

re

ef e

cosy

stem

s an

d/or

se

agra

ss m

eado

w a

nd/o

r m

angr

ove

fore

st?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B57C

H

as t

he p

hysi

cal-c

hem

ical

-ge

olog

ical

qua

lity

of t

he w

ater

s in

the

cor

e zo

ne, s

usta

inab

le

fishe

ries

zone

, use

zon

e,

rest

ricte

d us

e zo

ne, a

nd/o

r ot

her

zone

s be

en m

aint

aine

d/

pres

erve

d?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.


28Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

29

2932

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4. R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent

B58

Wha

t is

the

con

ditio

n of

fis

h po

pula

tions

or

non-

fish

targ

et

spec

ies

popu

latio

ns in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. U

sers

sh

ould

sel

ect o

ne fr

om th

e op

tions

B58

A to

B58

F th

at

is m

ost r

elev

ant t

o th

e sit

uatio

n an

d ty

pe o

f are

a.

B58A

H

ave

fish

popu

latio

ns b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed

in t

he

core

zon

e, s

usta

inab

le f

ishe

ries

zone

, and

use

zon

e?

Fish

pop

ulat

ion

mon

itorin

g re

port

s fo

r co

nser

vatio

n ta

rget

s (in

clud

ing

biom

ass,

num

ber

of fis

h sp

ecie

s,

abun

danc

e, d

iver

sity

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58B

Ha

s th

e qu

ality

(len

gth

and

wei

ght)

of

dom

inan

t fish

spe

cies

in th

e co

re z

one,

su

stai

nabl

e fis

herie

s zo

ne, u

se z

one

and/

or re

stric

ted

use

zone

(cap

ture

fis

herie

s) b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or

impr

oved

?

Qua

lity

(leng

th/w

eigh

t) m

onito

ring

repo

rts

of f

ish

in the

se z

ones

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B58C

H

as t

he v

olum

e of

fis

hers

’ cat

ches

in

the

sus

tain

able

fis

herie

s zo

ne/r

estr

icte

d us

e zo

ne b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or im

prov

ed?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

the

vol

ume

of

fishe

rs’ c

atch

es (

tota

l bio

mas

s pe

r nu

mbe

r of

fis

hers

per

uni

t/tim

e pe

riod)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58D

Ha

ve fi

sher

pro

duct

ion

volu

mes

in th

e su

stai

nabl

e fis

herie

s zo

ne/r

estri

cted

us

e zo

ne (a

quac

ultu

re) b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or im

prov

ed?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

aqu

acul

ture

pr

oduc

tion

volu

mes

(bi

omas

s pe

r nu

mbe

r of

fis

hers

per

uni

t/tim

e pe

riod)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58E

H

ave

the

num

ber

and

dive

rsity

of

non-

fish

targ

et s

peci

es in

the

cor

e zo

ne, s

usta

inab

le u

se z

one

and/

or

rest

ricte

d us

e zo

ne b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

num

ber

and

dive

rsity

of no

n-fis

h ta

rget

spe

cies

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B58F

Ha

ve p

opul

atio

ns o

f end

emic

spec

ies

been

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed?

M

onito

ring

repo

rts

on e

ndem

ic

spec

ies

popu

latio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

33

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

14

. Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t

B59

Has

res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t re

leva

nt t

o th

e ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out

to s

uppo

rt

man

agem

ent

activ

ities

?

Publ

ishe

d re

sear

ch &

dev

elop

men

t do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B60

Is u

se o

f th

e ar

ea’s

res

ourc

es

orga

nize

d, w

ithou

t ha

ving

a

nega

tive

impa

ct o

n ha

bita

ts/

popu

latio

ns in

the

are

a?

Anal

ysis

of

reso

urce

use

rep

orts

an

d ha

bita

t/po

pula

tion

mon

itorin

g re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

15

. Soc

io-

econ

omic

&

cult

ura

l m

anag

emen

t

B61

Doe

s m

anag

emen

t of

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea

acco

mm

odat

e lo

cal t

radi

tiona

l an

d cu

ltura

l con

ditio

ns a

nd/o

r lo

cal k

now

ledg

e?

Rep

orts

of

inte

rvie

ws

with

in

dige

nous

peo

ples

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B62

Has

the

leve

l of

com

mun

ity

supp

ort

for

man

agem

ent

of

the

cons

erva

tion

area

in

crea

sed?

Rep

ort

of m

onito

ring

of lo

cal

com

mun

ity p

erce

ptio

ns (

whi

ch

indi

cate

incr

ease

d co

mm

unity

aw

aren

ess

of a

nd a

ctio

n th

at

supp

orts

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

man

agem

ent)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B63

Has

com

mun

ity p

artic

ipat

ion

in

man

agem

ent

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

incr

ease

d?

Rep

ort

of c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

anag

emen

t ac

tiviti

es (

that

in

dica

te c

omm

unity

rep

rese

ntat

ion

and

part

icip

atio

n in

all

man

agem

ent

proc

esse

s, o

r co

mm

unity

par

ticip

atio

n in

im

plem

entin

g pr

ogra

ms

that

are

re

leva

nt t

o th

e co

mm

unity

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.


30Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

31

3134

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

15

. Soc

io-

econ

omic

&

cult

ura

l m

anag

emen

t

B64

Has

the

inci

denc

e of

bre

ache

s in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

decr

ease

d?

Patro

l rep

orts

con

tain

ing

data

abo

ut

illega

l and

env

ironm

enta

l unf

riend

ly

activ

ities

, and

the

num

ber o

f hab

itats

da

mag

ed in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

(ti

me

serie

s re

ports

), co

mm

unity

pa

trol r

epor

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B65

Do

stak

ehol

ders

use

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea a

s a

plac

e fo

r tr

aini

ng a

nd e

duca

tion?

Rep

orts

on

trai

ning

and

edu

catio

n in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B66

Do

tour

ism

act

iviti

es in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea p

rovi

de

soci

o-ec

onom

ic b

enef

its t

o st

akeh

olde

rs, p

artic

ular

ly t

he

loca

l com

mun

ity?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of t

ouris

m

activ

ities

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B67

Do

aqua

cultu

re a

ctiv

ities

in t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

pro

vide

so

cio-

econ

omic

ben

efits

to

stak

ehol

ders

, par

ticul

arly

the

lo

cal c

omm

unity

?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of a

quac

ultu

re

activ

ities

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B68

Do c

aptu

re fi

sher

ies

activ

ities

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

pro

vide

so

cio-e

cono

mic

bene

fits

to

stak

ehol

ders

, par

ticul

arly

the

loca

l co

mm

unity

?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of c

aptu

re

fishe

ries

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge

35

Leve

l St

age

Gol

d 5:

Sel

f Su

stai

ning

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

E69

Are

part

ners

hips

with

st

akeh

olde

rs p

rogr

essi

ng w

ell

and

havi

ng a

pos

itive

impa

ct?

Activ

ity a

nd m

onito

ring

repo

rts,

and

in

depe

nden

t st

udy

repo

rts

that

in

dica

te a

pos

itive

impa

ct f

rom

pa

rtne

rshi

ps.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

16

. Im

prov

ing

co

mm

unit

y w

elfa

re

E70

Is m

anag

emen

t ha

ving

a

posi

tive

impa

ct o

n m

anag

emen

t pe

rfor

man

ce?

Inde

pend

ent

stud

y re

port

s th

at

indi

cate

man

agem

ent

activ

ities

hav

e a

posi

tive

impa

ct o

n th

e ar

ea’s

re

sour

ces,

and

on

soci

al a

nd

econ

omic

asp

ects

(in

clud

ing

man

agem

ent

orga

niza

tion)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

E71

Hav

e in

com

es (

purc

hasi

ng

pow

er)

incr

ease

d as

an

impa

ct

of m

anag

emen

t?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns, s

tatis

tics

agen

cy d

ata.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

E72

Has

eco

nom

ic a

ctiv

ity in

cor

e se

ctor

s in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

(fis

herie

s/to

uris

m)

incr

ease

d?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns, s

tatis

tics

agen

cy d

ata.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

E73

Hav

e in

crea

sed

loca

l inc

omes

ra

ised

pub

lic a

war

enes

s of

the

ne

ed t

o su

ppor

t co

nser

vatio

n of

th

e ar

ea’s r

esou

rces

?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

17

. Su

stai

nabl

e fu

ndin

g

E74

Hav

e ac

tiviti

es c

arrie

d ou

t bee

n a

part

of a

sus

tain

able

fund

ing

syst

em

that

eng

ages

sta

keho

lder

s?

Activ

ity r

epor

ts a

nd f

inan

cial

re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge


32Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

33

33

36

D2: Evaluation Method

The steps involved in evaluating management effectiveness are summarized in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2 – Steps in evaluating management effectiveness The first step is to form the team that will perform the evaluation. In general, the composition of the team depends on the aim of the evaluation activity itself; whether it is for evaluation purposes or for planning activities to improve management performance. For evaluation purposes, it is strongly recommended that 50% of the team is made up of people other than management, in particular representatives of the direct stakeholders such as representatives of fishers, tourism businesses, other community members, and the other 50% from the conservation management team, in particular the unit head and planners. For planning purposes, all the team members could come from the local area, but involving stakeholders such as local Marine Affairs & Fisheries agency, the Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species, and other relevant institutions such as the National Aquatic Conservation Area Office and the Coasts and Marine Resources Management Office, is strongly recommended. The next step is to gather the necessary background and baseline data to assist the next step, which is completing the evaluation score card. Please note that what is meant by baseline data here includes, but is not limited to, decrees, minutes of meetings or workshops, and activity reports. In other words, anything that can be used as a tool to verify ‘Yes’ answers, if agreed, can be used as baseline data.

Form evaluation team

Collect background and baseline data

Complete evaluation score card

Make a list of recommendations

Prioritize recommendations

37

It is strongly recommended that the score cards are completed through focus group discussions that are guided by a facilitator who plays a neutral role. The focus group discussions should be limited to a maximum of 10 participants. As well as to obtain the consensus of the evaluation team members, the focus group discussions should also act as a control of the responses given. As the score cards presented above show, and as presented in the appendix, as far as possible, positive ‘Yes’ responses should be backed by concrete proof that verifies the answer. Because only by giving as honest answers as possible can a list of recommended activities for the subsequent stage be made. Preparation of the list of recommended activities should be based on all the ‘No’ answers generated at each level. Prioritizing of the recommended activities should be based on availability of funding and resources. It is strongly recommended that the priority scales commonly used by government agencies be used here. How to answer the questions

There are two possible answers to the questions on the score card: ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. It should be added here that ‘Yes’ answers should be given for activities or matters related to the question that have been done or completed. Therefore, if an activity is still in progress, or, for example, has been done but no report has been produced yet, the answer is ‘No’. However, there are some more specific questions related to activities that could be answered ‘Yes’ (for example, question K13). How to measure achievement at each stage To determine achievement at each stage, the following simple formula is used:

Achievement (percent) =

Number of ‘Yes’ answers Number of questions at the level being

evaluated* x100%

*Red = 8; Yellow = 11; Green = 21; Blue = 28; Gold = 6 Example: If at level Red, the answer to 5 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (5/8 x 100)% = 62.4% If at level Green, the answer to 10 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (10/19 x 100)% = 52.6% If at level Blue, the answer to 15 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (15/27 x 100)% = 55.6% How to determine the level of a conservation area To determine the level of the conservation area evaluated, the following simple rules are applied. If a conservation area achieves a perfect score of 100% for a particular level, then it is at that level. This simple rule applies because this evaluation is based


34Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

35

35

38

on the principle of building blocks, whereby the next level cannot be attained if all the activities at the previous level have not be done or completed. Following are some practical examples. It is should be emphasized here that the software used determines the level automatically. Example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,

Red Yellow Green Blue Gold 100% 100% 90% 27% 0%

the conservation area being evaluated is level YELLOW. Another example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,


the conservation area being evaluated is level RED, with a 95% achievement. Another example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,


the conservation area being evaluated is level RED. How to present the level of a conservation area For reporting purposes then, only the level color and percentage achievement need be presented in reports, or for example, factsheets. Several examples are given below: 100% (means the conservation area is level RED)

100% (means the conservation area is level YELLOW)

100% (means the conservation area is level BLUE)

39

CHAPTER IV REPORTING

A. Evaluation Data Collected

The evaluation data collected is then stored in an electronic file, and saved in a

folder that is structured and named according to the agreed format. Storage of the evaluation data files should be structured so that they are easy to find when needed again. An example of a folder structure for storing data is:

D:\Monitoring Data\Effectiveness

After being stored electronically, the data recorded on the hardcopy of the form are stored in a structured folder. The names of the files must also be standardized to make them easy to find and to compare between years. It is suggested that the following format be used to name files: <name of conservation area_data type_year collected>. Examples:

Gili Matra_effectiveness_baseline2011.xls Gili Matra_effectiveness_monitoring2012.xls

When the data are entered and stored, then they can be analyzed.

B. Analysis Based on the answers on the evaluation score card, the level of the conservation area being evaluated for its effectiveness can be determined; from red, yellow, green, and blue to gold. This is based on macro and micro level evaluation. Each level has a value or achievement percentage. For example conservation are A is level green, with a percentage achievement of 50%. See the end of point D2: Evaluation Method above.

These levels can be compared over time to obtain information about the change in the effectiveness of the management of the area being evaluated at the agreed time intervals. Increased effectiveness of the management of a conservation area over a particular time period does not necessarily mean a change in its level, but could also mean a change in achievement at the same level.

As well as analyzing changes in level and achievement at each level, analysis can also be made of criteria that are not achieved at each level, including levels that have been achieved and levels that wish to be achieved. This analysis produced recommendations, in the form of proposed programs/activities for the management team of the conservation area for management of the conservation that year and/or reporting period.

C. Conclusions

Conclusions are made based on the level and percentage effectiveness achieved for the conservation area. If the evaluation takes the form of monitoring, then the


36Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

37

37

40

conclusions can also be translated into change in effectiveness over time. Then, the conclusions can also be translated into recommendations or proposed programs/activities for the subsequent year and/or period.

D. Report Structure

The report of the findings of the evaluation of the management of an aquatic, coasts, and small islands conservation area should be presented as structured in Table 4 below: Table 4 – Recommended structure of a report on the findings of an evaluation of the

management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area

Title Abstract or Summary Table of Contents Description of evaluation team Introduction / Background Management, conservation area resources, and local socio-economic and cultural objectives

Evaluation findings – level of conservation area Conclusions and Recommendations Priority Recommendations Appendices (especially findings of monitoring of management, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects)

41

CHAPTER V RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW UP ACTION

A. Recommendations

From the results of the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the

conservation area, to progress to the next level of sustainable management, at a minimum it is recommended that the following steps be taken:

a. Evaluation result: Level 1 (Red) Immediately establish a conservation area management unit Immediately prepare a conservation area management plan

b. Evaluation result: Level 2 (Yellow) Implement institutional strengthening Build conservation area infrastructure Perform key management activities

c. Evaluation result: Level 3 (Green) Practice good conservation area management

d. Evaluation result: Level 4 (Blue) Take measures to network with non-governmental organizations to

contribute to management of the conservation area Forge partnerships with other non-governmental parties to manage the

conservation area

e. Evaluation result: Level 5 (Gold) Undertake monitoring and evaluation to maintain the sustainability of the

management of the conservation area B. Follow Up Action

From the results of the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the

conservation area, the problems and weaknesses the management facing in managing the area can be identified. The managers of the conservation area can then draft follow up plans based on the recommendations for improving management effectiveness. For government, the results of the conservation area management evaluation can be used as the basis for evaluating performance, which can then be used to give awards or mete out punishments for conservation area management. Awards Awards are given to management teams that have managed the conservation area effectively to graduate to the next level. The form the awards take will be regulated by the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Areas.

Punishments Punishments are meted out to management teams for not implementing the recommendations for a particular level within a certain timeframe, so there is no improvement in management performance and no subsequent change in level. The form the punishments will take will be regulated by the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands.


38Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

39

39

42

CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION

These technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas are part of the effort to achieve the target of sustainable management of conservation areas. Enacted in Jakarta

On 9 October 2012

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF

MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

Signed

SUDIRMAN SAAD

Deemed a true copy of the original

Head of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations

Achmad Satiri

43

Appendix II: Decree of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Number KEP.44/KP3K/2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas.

LIST OF SCORE CARDS FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS

FORM DESCRIPTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE CONSERVATION

AREA 2 EVALUATION SCORE CARDS:

a. RED (LEVEL 1): CONSERVATION AREA INITIATED b. YELLOW (LEVEL 2): CONSERVATION AREA

ESTABLISHED c. GREEN (LEVEL 3): CONSERVATION AREA MANAGED

MINIMALLY d. BLUE (LEVEL 4): CONSERVATION AREA MANAGED

OPTIMALLY e. GOLD (LEVEL 5): SELF-RELIANT CONSERVATION AREA

Enacted in Jakarta On 9th October 2012

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

Signed

SUDIRMAN SAAD

Deemed a true copy of the originalHead of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations Bureau

Achmad Satiri


40Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

41

41

44

A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE CONSERVATION AREA Conservation area CODE <record conservation area CODE here> Conservation area NAME <record conservation area NAME here> Conservation area LOCATION <record conservation area LOCATION here> Conservation area COORDINATES Longitude W/E Latitude N/S

Point 1 Point 2 Point 3 Point 4 Point 5

<add as required> Management Goals Note: there can be more

than one goal for each aspect or they can be divided into sub-goals.

Area Resources Goals Socio-Economic & Cultural Goals

Conservation target 1 Note: conservation

targets are the resources that will be managed. They may be species populations, habitats and/or ecosystems.

Conservation target 2 Conservation target 3 Conservation target 4

Socio-economic & cultural target 1

Note: socio-economic and cultural targets include everything that is aimed at providing incentives to increase support for the conservation area. Examples: alternative livelihoods, participation, behavior change, etc.




45

B.

EVA

LUA

TIO

N S

CO

RE

CA

RD

S

Le

vel

Stag

e

Red

1:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea

Initi

ated

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

1:

Init

iati

ve

prop

osal

Prop

osal

to

initi

ate

esta

blis

hmen

t of

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

subm

itted

by

(sel

ect

one)

L

ist

of p

ropo

sers

, if

mor

e th

an

one.

U

ser

mus

t at

tach

initi

ativ

e pr

opos

al d

ocum

ents

as

refe

rred

to

in A

rtic

le 9

cla

use

(2)

of t

he

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r is

as

ked

to c

hoos

e on

e fr

om a

list

of

prop

oser

s.

Whe

re t

here

is m

ore

than

one

pro

pose

r, ju

st

sele

ct t

he m

ain

prop

oser

and

list

the

ot

her

prop

oser

s in

the

ve

rific

atio

n co

lum

n. I

n ca

ses

whe

re t

he a

rea

has

alre

ady

been

id

entif

ied/

res

erve

d, t

he

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is t

aken

to

be ‘Y

es’.

M1

Indi

vidu

al

Com

mun

ity g

roup

Res

earc

h in

stitu

te

Educ

atio

nal i

nstit

ute

Gov

ernm

ent

orga

niza

tion

NG

O


42Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

43

4346

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

1:

Init

iati

ve

prop

osal

Prop

osal

to

initi

ate

esta

blis

hmen

t of

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

is s

ubm

itted

to:

(se

lect

one

) D

ocum

ents

as

refe

rred

to

in

Artic

le 1

1 cl

ause

(2)

of

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r se

lect

s ‘Y

es’ t

o an

swer

this

ques

tion

if th

e pr

opos

al is

as

refe

rred

to in

Art

icle

11

claus

es (1

) and

(2) o

f the

M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs

and

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tion

Num

ber 0

2/20

09. U

ser

mus

t sel

ect ‘

No’ f

or

ques

tion

M2b

. In

case

s w

here

the

area

has

alre

ady

been

iden

tifie

d/ re

serv

ed,

the

answ

er to

this

ques

tion

is ta

ken

to b

e ‘Y

es’.

M2a

Nat

iona

l gov

ernm

ent

or lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent

with

out

prel

imin

ary

surv

ey a

nd m

ap.

M2b

N

atio

nal g

over

nmen

t or

loca

l go

vern

men

t w

ith p

relim

inar

y su

rvey

and

map

.

Doc

umen

ts a

s re

ferr

ed t

o in

Ar

ticle

10

of t

he M

inis

ter

of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Use

r se

lect

s ‘Y

es’ t

o an

swer

this

ques

tion

if th

e pr

opos

al is

as

refe

rred

to in

Art

icle

10

claus

es (1

), (2

) and

(3) o

f th

e M

inist

er o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

latio

n Nu

mbe

r 02

/200

9. U

ser m

ust s

elec

t ‘N

o’ fo

r que

stio

n M

2a. I

n ca

ses

whe

re th

e ar

ea h

as

alre

ady

been

iden

tifie

d/

rese

rved

, the

ans

wer

to th

is qu

estio

n is

take

n to

be

‘Yes

’.

47

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

2. A

rea

iden

tifi

cati

on

and

inve

ntor

y

M3

Has

a s

urve

y an

d ev

alua

tion

of the

pr

opos

ed a

rea

been

car

ried

out

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Reg

ulat

ions

N

umbe

r PE

R.02

/MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PE

R.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Stud

y re

port

s pu

rsua

nt t

o th

e M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M4

Has

soc

ializ

atio

n of

the

pro

pose

d ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER

.02/

MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PE

R.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Soci

aliz

atio

n re

port

s pu

rsua

nt t

o th

e M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M5

Have

pub

lic c

onsu

ltatio

ns re

gard

ing

the

prop

osed

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out p

ursu

ant t

o th

e M

inist

er o

f M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tions

Nu

mbe

r PE

R.02

/MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PE

R.17

/MEN

/200

8?

Publ

ic c

onsu

ltatio

n re

port

s pu

rsua

nt

to t

he M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M6

Has

coor

dina

tion

with

rel

evan

t go

vern

men

t age

ncie

s re

gard

ing

the

prop

osed

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out p

ursu

ant t

o th

e M

inist

er o

f M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fish

erie

s Re

gula

tions

Nu

mbe

r PE

R.02

/MEN

/200

9 an

d/or

PE

R.17

/MEN

/200

8?

Coor

dina

tion

repo

rts

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd

Fish

erie

s Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

M7

Have

the

resu

lts o

f ide

ntific

ation

and

in

vent

ory

been

use

d to

reco

mm

end

the

prop

osed

cons

erva

tion

area

pur

suan

t to

the

Mini

ster o

f Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

isher

ies

Regu

lation

s Num

ber P

ER.0

2/ME

N/20

09

and/

or P

ER.1

7/ME

N/20

08?

Rec

omm

enda

tion

for

the

prop

osed

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea p

ursu

ant

to A

rtic

le

19 o

f th

e M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

an

d Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or A

rtic

le 1

5 of

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.


44Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

45

4548

Leve

l RED

: st

age

1 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

init

iate

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

3. R

eser

vati

on

of

con

serv

atio

n

area

M8a

H

as t

he a

rea

been

res

erve

d,

but

not

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Dec

ree/

regu

latio

n, t

hat

will

nee

d to

be

revi

sed

acco

rdin

gly

(ref

er t

o Ar

ticle

20

clau

se (

2) o

f th

e M

inis

ter

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fi

sher

ies

Reg

ulat

ion

Num

ber

02/2

009)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Are

as

are

gene

rally

res

erve

d by

dec

ree/

regu

latio

n.

M8b

H

as t

he a

rea

been

res

erve

d,

purs

uant

to

the

Min

iste

r of

M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fis

herie

s Reg

ulat

ions

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009

and/

or

PER.1

7/M

EN/2

008?

Dec

ree/

regu

latio

n re

serv

ing

the

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. A

reas

ar

e ge

nera

lly r

eser

ved

by d

ecre

e/re

gula

tion.

To

tal n

umbe

r of

‘Yes

’ ans

wer

s

Perc

enta

ge

49

Leve

l St

age

Yel

low

2:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea E

stab

lishe

d

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niz

atio

nal

un

it a

nd

pers

onne

l

K9

Are

ther

e co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l in

plac

e?

Org

aniz

atio

nal s

truc

ture

and

/or

mai

n ta

sks

& f

unct

ions

do

cum

ent.

Peop

le/in

divid

uals

or a

n or

gani

zatio

n w

ith th

e fu

nctio

n an

d ta

sk o

f man

agin

g th

e ar

ea. F

or e

xam

ple:

re

spon

sibilit

y fo

r man

agin

g th

e co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea is

a

part

of th

e jo

b de

scrip

tion

of

the

Coas

ts a

nd S

mal

l Isla

nds

Mon

itorin

g Se

ctio

n.

K10

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve t

he p

erso

nnel

app

oint

ed

by d

ecre

e?

Dec

ree

of t

he lo

cal g

over

nmen

t he

ad/

min

iste

r/un

it he

ad.

Org

aniz

atio

nal s

truc

ture

and

/or

mai

n ta

sks

& f

unct

ions

do

cum

ent.

Peop

le/in

divi

dual

s or

or

gani

zatio

n ap

poin

ted

and

dete

rmin

ed b

y D

ecre

e.

K11

Is t

here

an

adeq

uate

num

ber

of

pers

onne

l in

the

man

agem

ent

unit

to r

un t

he o

rgan

izat

ion?

Org

aniz

atio

nal s

truc

ture

and

/or

mai

n ta

sks

& f

unct

ions

do

cum

ent

Man

ager

s jo

b de

scrip

tions

.

An a

dequ

ate

num

ber

of

pers

onne

l to

exec

ute

the

mai

n ta

sks

& f

unct

ions

of

the

orga

niza

tion

as p

er

gove

rnm

ent

min

imum

st

anda

rd.

K12

Hav

e th

e m

anag

ers

had

basi

c co

nser

vatio

n tr

aini

ng?

Trai

ning

rep

orts

or

cert

ifica

tes

or

othe

r pr

oof.

Take

n pa

rt in

at

leas

t 1

trai

ning

cou

rse

appr

opria

te t

o m

ain

task

s &

fun

ctio

ns, s

uch

as M

PA

101,

fis

h re

sour

ces

cons

erva

tion

trai

ning

, di

ving

and

mon

itorin

g tr

aini

ng, e

tc.


46Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

47

4750

Leve

l YEL

LOW

: st

age

2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

5.

Man

agem

ent

and

zon

ing

plan

s

K13

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of t

he m

anag

emen

t pl

an?

No

man

agem

ent

plan

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If

the

answ

er is

‘Yes

’, do

not

co

mpl

ete

the

tabl

e fo

r cr

iteria

5 (

man

agem

ent

and

zoni

ng p

lans

).

Man

agem

ent

plan

be

ing

draf

ted.

D

raft

man

agem

ent

plan

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. I

f th

e an

swer

is ‘Y

es’,

answ

er

‘No’

for

the

oth

er

ques

tions

in K

13.

Man

agem

ent

plan

fin

aliz

ed.

Fin

aliz

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an.

Doc

umen

t si

gned

by

the

head

of

the

man

agem

ent

unit.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If th

e an

swer

is ‘Y

es’,

answ

er ‘N

o’

for t

he o

ther

que

stio

ns in

K1

3. T

he m

anag

emen

t do

cum

ent h

as b

een

final

ized

and

subm

itted

for a

ppro

val.

The

draf

ting

phas

es o

f the

m

anag

emen

t doc

umen

t are

pe

r Arti

cle 3

0 of

Reg

ulat

ion

of

the

Min

ister

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

an

d Fi

sher

ies

30/2

010.

K1

4 D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

plan

co

ntai

n re

sour

ces

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic a

nd c

ultu

ral

info

rmat

ion

that

can

be

used

as

base

line

data

(t 0

)?

M

anag

emen

t pl

an:

man

agem

ent

plan

mat

rix/

sum

mar

y, c

onta

inin

g in

form

atio

n ab

out

reso

urce

s –

base

line

data

.

Oth

er s

uppo

rtin

g do

cum

ents

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Info

rmat

ion

abou

t res

ourc

es a

nd s

ocio

-ec

onom

ic an

d cu

ltura

l co

nditio

ns in

eac

h co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea, s

uch

as

cora

l ree

f cov

erag

e, ta

rget

fis

h ab

unda

nce,

loca

l co

mm

unity

per

cept

ions

, fis

hers

’ inco

mes

, etc

.

51

Leve

l YEL

LOW

: st

age

2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

6. F

acili

ties

an

d in

fras

truc

ture

to

sup

port

m

anag

emen

t

K15

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve

offic

es?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

K16

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve

an in

form

atio

n bo

ard?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. A

n in

form

atio

n bo

ard

that

ex

plai

ns a

t a

min

imum

the

bo

unda

ries

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

, and

its

zoni

ng s

yste

m a

nd w

hat

activ

ities

are

pe

rmitt

ed/n

ot p

erm

itted

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

. K1

7 D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

inim

um o

ffic

e eq

uipm

ent?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. T

he

min

imum

of

equi

pmen

t th

at e

nabl

es t

he

orga

niza

tion

to f

unct

ion,

su

ch a

s fu

rnitu

re, d

ata

proc

essi

ng t

ools

, co

mm

unic

atio

n to

ols.

K1

8 D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

anag

emen

t fa

cilit

ies

(mon

itorin

g to

ols,

co

mm

unic

atio

n to

ols)

?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.


48Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

49

4952

Leve

l YEL

LOW

: st

age

2 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea e

stab

lishe

d (c

onti

nued

)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

7.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

K19

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t?

No

man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If

the

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is ‘Y

es’,

the

answ

er t

o th

e ot

her

ques

tion

in

K19

is ‘N

o’.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort,

bu

t no

t su

ffic

ient

(en

ough

to

oper

ate

offic

e).

Man

agem

ent

unit

finan

cial

re

port

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

If

the

answ

er t

o th

is q

uest

ion

is ‘Y

es’,

the

answ

er t

o th

e ot

her

ques

tion

in

K19

is ‘N

o’.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Pe

rcen

tage

53

Leve

l St

age

Gre

en

3: C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

Man

aged

Min

imal

ly

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niz

atio

nal

un

it a

nd

pers

onne

l

H20

Ar

e th

ere

suffi

cient

per

sonn

el in

the

man

agem

ent u

nit t

o ex

ecut

e th

e m

anag

emen

t fun

ctio

ns (s

urve

illanc

e,

reso

urce

mon

itorin

g, s

ocio

-eco

nom

ic & c

ultu

ral m

onito

ring)

?

Doc

umen

ts a

nd/o

r re

port

s re

late

d to

the

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l fun

ctio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory

H21

D

o pe

rson

nel i

n th

e m

anag

emen

t un

it ha

ve q

ualif

icat

ions

in a

t lea

st

two

of th

e fo

llow

ing

requ

ired

man

agem

ent c

ompe

tenc

ies

(pla

nnin

g, m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n,

surv

eilla

nce,

res

earc

h, res

ourc

es

and

socio

-eco

nom

ic an

d cu

ltura

l m

onito

ring)

?

Cert

ifica

tes

of c

ompe

tenc

y.

Self-

expl

anat

ory

H22

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t un

it in

itiat

ed p

artn

ersh

ips

with

st

akeh

olde

rs?

Stak

ehol

der

com

mun

icat

ion

repo

rts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y

5. F

acili

ties

an

d in

fras

truc

ture

to

sup

port

m

anag

emen

t

H23

D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

offic

e ha

ve a

dequ

ate

offic

e eq

uipm

ent?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y

H24

D

oes

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

m

anag

emen

t su

ppor

ting

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

?

Rep

orts

(on

sur

veill

ance

eq

uipm

ent,

res

ourc

e m

onito

ring

equi

pmen

t, c

omm

unic

atio

n/

soci

aliz

atio

n to

ols

and

othe

r fa

cilit

ies,

bou

ndar

y m

arke

rs)

and

phys

ical

che

cks.

Self-

expl

anat

ory


50Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

51

5154

Leve

l GR

EEN

: st

age

3 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea m

anag

ed m

inim

ally

(co

ntin

ued)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

6.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

H25

H

as a

man

agem

ent

fund

ing

plan

bee

n pr

epar

ed?

Stra

tegy

doc

umen

ts a

nd f

undi

ng

plan

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H26

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t un

it se

cure

d m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t fr

om t

he lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent

budg

et /

sta

te

budg

et?

Man

agem

ent

unit

finan

ce r

epor

ts

that

mee

t st

anda

rds

appl

icab

le in

In

done

sia

& a

nnua

l wor

k pl

an.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H27

H

ave

plan

s be

en m

ade

to

secu

re f

undi

ng f

or m

anag

emen

t of

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea?

Alte

rnat

ive

budg

et p

ropo

sal

docu

men

ts, l

ette

rs o

f ap

plic

atio

n,

prop

osal

s an

d ot

her

docu

men

tatio

n.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

8. A

ppro

val o

f m

anag

emen

t an

d zo

nin

g pl

ans

H28

H

as t

he f

inal

ized

man

agem

ent

plan

bee

n su

bmitt

ed f

or

appr

oval

?

Prop

osal

doc

umen

ts a

nd p

ropo

sal

rece

ipt.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H29

H

as t

he m

anag

emen

t pl

an b

een

appr

oved

?

D

ecre

e ap

prov

ing

the

man

agem

ent

plan

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

9.

Man

agem

ent

stan

dard

op

erat

ing

proc

edur

es

(SO

Ps)

H30

Ar

e th

ere

SOPs

for

off

ice

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

finan

cial

m

anag

emen

t?

SOP

docu

men

ts. P

leas

e st

ate.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H31

Ar

e th

ere

SOPs

for

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

(m

inim

um

stan

dard

s)?

SOP

docu

men

ts o

n fa

cilit

ies

and

infr

astr

uctu

re

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H32

Ar

e th

ere

man

agem

ent S

OPs

(for

in

stitu

tiona

l str

engt

heni

ng, j

oint

pa

trol

s, re

sour

ce m

anag

emen

t, an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

& c

ultu

ral

stre

ngth

enin

g) th

at m

eet t

he

min

imum

sta

ndar

ds?

SOP

docu

men

ts. P

leas

e st

ate.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

55

Leve

l GR

EEN

: st

age

3 –

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea m

anag

ed m

inim

ally

(co

ntin

ued)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

10

. Im

plem

enta

tio

n of

m

anag

emen

t an

d zo

nin

g pl

ans

H33

Ha

s th

e in

stitu

tiona

l stre

ngth

enin

g st

rate

gy b

een

impl

emen

ted?

Ac

tivity

mon

itorin

g &

eva

luat

ion

repo

rts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H34

H

as a

bas

elin

e su

rvey

of

reso

urce

s be

en c

ondu

cted

?

M

anag

emen

t pl

an a

nd/o

r su

rvey

re

port

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H35

H

as t

he r

esou

rce

man

agem

ent

stre

ngth

enin

g st

rate

gy b

een

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H36

H

as a

soc

io-e

cono

mic

and

cu

ltura

l bas

elin

e su

rvey

bee

n co

nduc

ted?

Man

agem

ent

plan

and

/or

surv

ey

repo

rts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H37

H

as a

soc

io-e

cono

mic

and

cu

ltura

l str

engt

heni

ng s

trat

egy

been

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

H38

Ar

e th

ere

initi

ativ

es t

o m

ake

use

of t

he a

rea

(at

leas

t on

e?)

Activ

ity m

onito

ring

& e

valu

atio

n re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

11

. D

esig

nati

on o

f A

quat

ic

Con

serv

atio

n

Are

a

H39

H

as t

he p

ropo

sal f

or

desi

gnat

ion

been

sub

mitt

ed t

o th

e M

inis

ter

for

Mar

ine

Affa

irs

and

Fish

erie

s?

Prop

osal

doc

umen

ts a

nd r

ecei

pt

of s

ubm

issi

on o

f do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

H40

H

as t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

bee

n de

sign

ated

by

the

Min

iste

r of

M

arin

e Af

fairs

and

Fis

herie

s?

Dec

ree

of t

he M

inis

ter.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge


52Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

53

5356

Leve

l St

age

Blu

e 4:

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea M

anag

ed O

ptim

ally

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4.

Man

agem

ent

orga

niz

atio

nal

un

it a

nd

pers

onne

l

B41

Do

pers

onne

l in

the

man

agem

ent

unit

have

qu

alifi

catio

ns in

the

req

uire

d m

anag

emen

t co

mpe

tenc

ies?

Docu

men

ts a

nd/o

r rep

orts

re

leva

nt to

man

agem

ent

pers

onne

l cap

acity

(pla

nnin

g,

mon

itorin

g &

eva

luat

ion,

su

rvei

llanc

e, re

sear

ch, r

esou

rces

an

d so

cio-e

cono

mic

and

cultu

ral

mon

itorin

g). T

rain

ing

certi

ficat

es

and/

or d

iplo

mas

as

proo

f of

qual

ifica

tions

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory

5. F

acili

ties

and

infr

astr

uctu

re to

su

ppor

t m

anag

emen

t

B42

Are

the

requ

ired

faci

litie

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

in p

lace

?

Rep

orts

and

phy

sica

l che

cks.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y

6.

Man

agem

ent

fund

ing

supp

ort

B43

Is m

anag

emen

t fu

ndin

g su

ppor

t av

aila

ble

as p

lann

ed?

Activ

ity im

plem

enta

tion

and

fund

ing

sour

ce r

epor

ts.

Res

pons

e to

thi

s qu

estio

n re

fers

to

the

budg

et

requ

irem

ent

per

ques

tion

H27

. 9

. M

anag

emen

t st

anda

rd

oper

atin

g pr

oced

ures

(S

OP

s)

B44

Are

ther

e tr

aini

ng a

nd

educ

atio

n SO

Ps in

pla

ce?

Trai

ning

and

edu

catio

n SO

P do

cum

ents

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B45

Are

the

SOPs

on

aqua

tic

tour

ism

act

iviti

es in

pla

ce?

Eco-

tour

ism

SO

P do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B46

Are

ther

e SO

Ps o

n aq

uacu

lture

in

pla

ce?

Aqua

cultu

re S

OP

docu

men

ts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B47

Are

ther

e SO

Ps o

n fis

hing

in

plac

e?

Fish

ing

SOP

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

57

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

11. D

esig

natio

n of

Aq

uatic

Co

nser

vatio

n Ar

ea

B48

Has

des

igna

tion

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

bee

n pu

blic

ized

?

Rep

orts

of

soci

aliz

atio

n ac

tiviti

es,

incl

udin

g at

tend

ance

list

s an

d ph

otog

raph

s of

act

iviti

es.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

12

. Bou

ndar

y m

arki

ng

B49

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of t

he b

ound

ary

mar

king

? -

Boun

dary

mar

king

initi

ated

.

Dec

ree

of b

ound

ary

mar

king

co

mm

ittee

as

per

Artic

le 2

4 of

Reg

ulat

ion

of t

he M

inis

ter

of

Mar

ine

Affa

irs a

nd F

ishe

ries

Num

ber

PER.0

2/M

EN/2

009.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

- Bo

unda

ry m

arki

ng in

pr

ogre

ss.

Activ

ity r

epor

ts (

mea

surin

g,

map

ping

and

soc

ializ

atio

n).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

- Bo

unda

ry m

arki

ng a

ppro

ved.

Not

ifica

tion

of b

ound

ary

mar

king

es

tabl

ished

by

Dec

ree

of th

e M

inist

er

of M

arin

e Af

fairs

& F

isher

ies.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

13

. Ins

titu

-ti

onal

izat

ion

B50

Hav

e pa

rtne

rshi

ps w

ith

stak

ehol

ders

bee

n ag

reed

?

Ac

tivity

coo

rdin

atio

n re

port

s, a

gree

-m

ents

, joi

nt p

rogr

ams,

and

sim

ilar.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B51

Hav

e pa

rtne

rshi

ps w

ith s

take

hold

ers

been

impl

emen

ted?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. U

sers

sh

ould

cho

ose

one

of

the

optio

ns p

rovi

ded.

N

o

Y

es, b

ut in

cide

ntal

.

Activ

ity r

epor

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Pa

rtne

rshi

ps a

re

tem

pora

ry o

r inc

iden

tal.

Yes

, sus

tain

able

pa

rtne

rshi

ps.

Activ

ity r

epor

ts.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Part

ners

hips

im

plem

ente

d as

pla

nned

.


54Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

55

5558

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

B52

Has

str

engt

heni

ng o

f lo

cal

inst

itutio

ns b

een

impl

emen

ted?

Activ

ity

repo

rts,

te

chni

cal

assi

stan

ce,

guid

ance

, tr

aini

ng,

exte

nsio

n.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B53

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of

enfo

rcem

ent

of r

ules

(m

onito

ring

& s

urve

illan

ce)

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

by

the

man

agem

ent

unit?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

Rul

es a

re n

ot e

nfor

ced.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Rul

es a

re c

onsi

sten

tly

enfo

rced

.

Reg

ulat

ion

soci

aliz

atio

n re

port

s;

info

rmat

ion

boar

ds;

surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B54

Wha

t is

the

sta

tus

of

com

mun

ity b

ased

sur

veill

ance

in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

N

ot d

one.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Initi

ated

and

in p

rogr

ess

(org

aniz

atio

n &

sys

tem

).

Doc

umen

ts (

repo

rts

of a

ctiv

ities

an

d fo

rmat

ion

of c

omm

unity

su

rvei

llanc

e gr

oup)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Reg

ular

sur

veill

ance

car

ried

out.

D

ocum

ents

(re

port

s of

com

mun

ity

surv

eilla

nce

activ

ities

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

59

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

B55

Is t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

entio

ned

in t

he N

atio

nal

Med

ium

-Ter

m D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

/ N

atio

nal G

over

nmen

t St

rate

gic

Plan

and

/or

the

Loca

l M

ediu

m-T

erm

Dev

elop

men

t Pl

an /

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t St

rate

gic

Plan

?

Nat

iona

l Med

ium

-Ter

m

Plan

/Nat

iona

l Gov

ernm

ent

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an;

Loca

l Med

ium

-Ter

m

Dev

elop

men

t Pl

an /

Loc

al

Gov

ernm

ent

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B56

Is t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

entio

ned

in t

he A

rea

Zoni

ng

Plan

/ C

oast

s an

d Sm

all

Isla

nds

Area

Zon

ing

Plan

?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Use

rs s

houl

d se

lect

on

e of

the

opt

ions

pr

ovid

ed.

N

o

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

In t

he p

roce

ss o

f be

ing

brou

ght

into

line

with

the

no

men

clat

ure

of c

urre

nt

regu

latio

ns

Activ

ity d

ocum

ents

/rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

In

the

pro

cess

of

bein

g de

sign

ated

by

loca

l re

gula

tion

Activ

ity d

ocum

ents

/rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Ye

s, t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

is

men

tione

d in

the

Are

a Zo

ning

Pla

n /

Coas

ts a

nd

Smal

l Isl

ands

Are

a Zo

ning

Pl

an

Area

Zon

ing

Plan

/ C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds A

rea

Zoni

ng P

lan

docu

men

ts.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.


56Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

57

5760

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

14

. Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t

B57

Wha

t is

the

con

ditio

n of

fis

h re

sour

ce h

abita

ts in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B57A

H

as t

here

bee

n im

prov

emen

t to

th

e co

nditi

on o

f ha

bita

ts in

the

co

re z

one,

sus

tain

able

fis

hing

zo

ne, u

se z

one,

res

tric

ted

use

zone

, and

/or

othe

r zo

nes,

as

indi

cate

d fo

r ex

ampl

e by

an

incr

ease

in t

he c

over

age

of

cora

l ree

f ec

osys

tem

s an

d/or

se

agra

ss m

eado

w a

nd/o

r m

angr

ove

fore

st?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B57B

H

as th

ere

been

impr

ovem

ent t

o th

e co

nditi

on o

f hab

itats

in th

e co

re z

one,

sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s zo

ne, u

se z

one,

rest

ricte

d us

e zo

ne, a

nd/o

r oth

er z

ones

, as

indi

cate

d fo

r exa

mpl

e by

an

incr

ease

in th

e ar

ea o

f cor

al ree

f ec

osys

tem

s an

d/or

sea

gras

s m

eado

w a

nd/o

r man

grov

e fo

rest

?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B57C

H

as t

he p

hysi

cal-c

hem

ical

-ge

olog

ical

qua

lity

of t

he w

ater

s in

the

cor

e zo

ne, s

usta

inab

le

fishe

ries

zone

, use

zon

e,

rest

ricte

d us

e zo

ne, a

nd/o

r ot

her

zone

s be

en m

aint

aine

d/

pres

erve

d?

Base

line

cond

ition

(t 0

) in

eac

h zo

ne c

ompa

red

with

the

res

ults

of

mon

itorin

g of

fish

res

ourc

e ha

bita

ts in

the

se z

ones

(sh

ould

re

fer

to t

empo

ral p

rogr

essi

on

data

).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

61

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

4. R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent

B58

Wha

t is

the

con

ditio

n of

fis

h po

pula

tions

or

non-

fish

targ

et

spec

ies

popu

latio

ns in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea?

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y. U

sers

sh

ould

sel

ect o

ne fr

om th

e op

tions

B58

A to

B58

F th

at

is m

ost r

elev

ant t

o th

e sit

uatio

n an

d ty

pe o

f are

a.

B58A

H

ave

fish

popu

latio

ns b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed

in t

he

core

zon

e, s

usta

inab

le f

ishe

ries

zone

, and

use

zon

e?

Fish

pop

ulat

ion

mon

itorin

g re

port

s fo

r co

nser

vatio

n ta

rget

s (in

clud

ing

biom

ass,

num

ber

of f

ish

spec

ies,

ab

unda

nce,

div

ersi

ty).

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58B

H

as th

e qu

ality

(le

ngth

and

wei

ght)

of

dom

inan

t fish

spe

cies

in th

e co

re

zone

, sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s zo

ne, u

se

zone

and

/or r

estr

icted

use

zon

e (c

aptu

re fi

sher

ies)

bee

n m

aint

aine

d or

impr

oved

?

Qua

lity

(leng

th/w

eigh

t) m

onito

ring

repo

rts

of f

ish

in t

hese

zon

es.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58C

H

as t

he v

olum

e of

fis

hers

’ cat

ches

in

the

sus

tain

able

fis

herie

s zo

ne/r

estr

icte

d us

e zo

ne b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or im

prov

ed?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

the

vol

ume

of

fishe

rs’ c

atch

es (

tota

l bio

mas

s pe

r nu

mbe

r of

fis

hers

per

uni

t/tim

e pe

riod)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58D

Ha

ve fi

sher

pro

duct

ion

volu

mes

in

the

sust

aina

ble

fishe

ries

zone

/ re

stric

ted

use

zone

(aqu

acul

ture

) be

en m

aint

aine

d or

impr

oved

?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

aqu

acul

ture

pr

oduc

tion

volu

mes

(bi

omas

s pe

r nu

mbe

r of

fis

hers

per

uni

t/tim

e pe

riod)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58E

H

ave

the

num

ber

and

dive

rsity

of

non-

fish

targ

et s

peci

es in

the

cor

e zo

ne, s

usta

inab

le u

se z

one

and/

or

rest

ricte

d us

e zo

ne b

een

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed?

Mon

itorin

g re

port

s on

num

ber

and

dive

rsity

of

non-

fish

targ

et s

peci

es.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B58F

Ha

ve p

opul

atio

ns o

f end

emic

spec

ies

been

mai

ntai

ned

or in

crea

sed?

M

onito

ring

repo

rts

on e

ndem

ic

spec

ies

popu

latio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

58Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

For

Eva

luat

ing

The

Man

agem

ent E

ffect

iven

ess

of A

quat

ic, C

oast

s an

d Sm

all I

slan

ds C

onse

rvat

ion

Area

s (E

-KKP

3K)

5962

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

14

. Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t

B59

Has

res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t re

leva

nt t

o th

e ar

ea b

een

carr

ied

out

to s

uppo

rt

man

agem

ent

activ

ities

?

Publ

ishe

d re

sear

ch &

dev

elop

men

t do

cum

ents

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B60

Is u

se o

f the

are

a’s

reso

urce

s or

gani

zed,

with

out h

avin

g a

nega

tive

impa

ct o

n ha

bita

ts/p

opul

atio

ns in

the

area

?

Anal

ysis

of

reso

urce

use

rep

orts

an

d ha

bita

t/po

pula

tion

mon

itorin

g re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

15

. Soc

io-

econ

omic

&

cult

ura

l m

anag

emen

t

B61

Doe

s m

anag

emen

t of

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea

acco

mm

odat

e lo

cal t

radi

tiona

l an

d cu

ltura

l con

ditio

ns a

nd/o

r lo

cal k

now

ledg

e?

Rep

orts

of

inte

rvie

ws

with

in

dige

nous

peo

ples

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B62

Has

the

leve

l of

com

mun

ity

supp

ort

for

man

agem

ent

of

the

cons

erva

tion

area

in

crea

sed?

Rep

ort

of m

onito

ring

of lo

cal

com

mun

ity p

erce

ptio

ns (

whi

ch

indi

cate

incr

ease

d co

mm

unity

aw

aren

ess

of a

nd a

ctio

n th

at

supp

orts

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

man

agem

ent)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B63

Has

com

mun

ity p

artic

ipat

ion

in

man

agem

ent

of t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

incr

ease

d?

Rep

ort

of c

onse

rvat

ion

area

m

anag

emen

t ac

tiviti

es (

that

in

dica

te c

omm

unity

rep

rese

ntat

ion

and

part

icip

atio

n in

all

man

agem

ent

proc

esse

s, o

r co

mm

unity

par

ticip

atio

n in

im

plem

entin

g pr

ogra

ms

that

are

re

leva

nt t

o th

e co

mm

unity

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

63

Leve

l BLU

E: s

tage

4 –

con

serv

atio

n a

rea

man

aged

opt

imal

ly (

cont

inue

d)

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

15

. Soc

io-

econ

omic

&

cult

ura

l m

anag

emen

t

B64

Has

the

inci

denc

e of

bre

ache

s in

th

e co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea

decr

ease

d?

Patr

ol r

epor

ts c

onta

inin

g da

ta a

bout

ill

egal

and

env

ironm

enta

l unf

riend

ly

activ

ities

, and

the

num

ber

of

habi

tats

dam

aged

in t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

(tim

e se

ries

repo

rts)

, com

mun

ity p

atro

l rep

orts

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B65

Do

stak

ehol

ders

use

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea a

s a

plac

e fo

r tr

aini

ng a

nd e

duca

tion?

Rep

orts

on

trai

ning

and

edu

catio

n in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

B66

Do

tour

ism

act

iviti

es in

the

co

nser

vatio

n ar

ea p

rovi

de s

ocio

-ec

onom

ic b

enef

its t

o st

akeh

olde

rs, p

artic

ular

ly t

he

loca

l com

mun

ity?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of t

ouris

m

activ

ities

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B67

Do

aqua

cultu

re a

ctiv

ities

in t

he

cons

erva

tion

area

pro

vide

soc

io-

econ

omic

ben

efits

to

stak

ehol

ders

, par

ticul

arly

the

lo

cal c

omm

unity

?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of a

quac

ultu

re

activ

ities

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

B68

Do

capt

ure

fishe

ries

activ

ities

in

the

cons

erva

tion

area

pro

vide

so

cio-

econ

omic

ben

efits

to

stak

ehol

ders

, par

ticul

arly

the

lo

cal c

omm

unity

?

Impa

ct a

naly

sis

of c

aptu

re

fishe

ries

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion

area

. Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge


60Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

61

6164

Leve

l St

age

Gol

d 5:

Sel

f Su

stai

ning

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

ea

CR

ITER

IA

NO

. Q

UES

TIO

N

AN

SWER

V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

N T

OO

L R

EMA

RK

S

Yes

No

13

. In

stit

uti

onal

izat

ion

E69

Are

part

ners

hips

with

st

akeh

olde

rs p

rogr

essi

ng w

ell

and

havi

ng a

pos

itive

impa

ct?

Activ

ity a

nd m

onito

ring

repo

rts,

and

in

depe

nden

t stu

dy re

port

s th

at in

dica

te

a po

sitiv

e im

pact

from

par

tner

ship

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

16

. Im

prov

ing

co

mm

unit

y w

elfa

re

E70

Is m

anag

emen

t ha

ving

a

posi

tive

impa

ct o

n m

anag

emen

t pe

rfor

man

ce?

Inde

pend

ent

stud

y re

port

s th

at

indi

cate

man

agem

ent

activ

ities

hav

e a

posi

tive

impa

ct o

n th

e ar

ea’s

re

sour

ces,

and

on

soci

al a

nd

econ

omic

asp

ects

(in

clud

ing

man

agem

ent

orga

niza

tion)

.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

E71

Hav

e in

com

es (

purc

hasi

ng

pow

er)

incr

ease

d as

an

impa

ct

of m

anag

emen

t?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns, s

tatis

tics

agen

cy d

ata.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

E72

Has

eco

nom

ic a

ctiv

ity in

cor

e se

ctor

s in

the

con

serv

atio

n ar

ea

(fis

herie

s/to

uris

m)

incr

ease

d?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns, s

tatis

tics

agen

cy d

ata.

Se

lf-ex

plan

ator

y.

E73

Hav

e in

crea

sed

loca

l inc

omes

ra

ised

pub

lic a

war

enes

s of

the

ne

ed t

o su

ppor

t co

nser

vatio

n of

th

e ar

ea’s r

esou

rces

?

Surv

eilla

nce

repo

rts/

inde

pend

ent

eval

uatio

ns.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

17

. Su

stai

nabl

e fu

ndin

g

E74

Hav

e ac

tiviti

es c

arrie

d ou

t bee

n a

part

of a

sus

tain

able

fund

ing

syst

em th

at e

ngag

es s

take

hold

ers?

Activ

ity r

epor

ts a

nd f

inan

cial

re

port

s.

Self-

expl

anat

ory.

Tota

l num

ber

of ‘Y

es’ a

nsw

ers

Perc

enta

ge

REfERENCES

Carter, E., Soemodinoto, A. & White, A. (2011). Guide for Improving Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness in Indonesia. Bali: The Nature Conservancy Indonesia Marine Program, xi + 49 pp.

Convention of Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 10 Decision X/31 on Protected Areas (Nagoya, 18–29 October 2010), Point B. Issues that need greater attention, Article 3 (Management Effectiveness) and Article 5 (marine protected areas, MPAs). Available at http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12297.

Hockings, M., Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (2000). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), x + 121 pp.

Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. & Courrau, J. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas, second edition. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), xiv +105 pp.

Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A., Hopkins, J., Mulliken, T., Safford, R., Statterfield, A., Walpole, M. & Manica, A. (2008). Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conservation Letters, 1: 155–164.

Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A., Hopkins, J., Mulliken, T., Safford, R., Stattersfield, A., Walpole, M. & Manica, A. (2009). Outcomes, not implementation, predict conservation success. Oryx, 43(3): 336–342.

Pomeroy, R.S., Parks, J.E. & Watson, L.M. (2004). How is Your MPA Doing? A Guidebook of Natural and Social Indicators for Evaluating Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), xvi + 216 pp.

Staub, F. & Hatziolos, M.E. (2004). Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness Goals for Marine Protected Areas. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 30 pp.

UNEP-WCMC (2008). National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.

White, A., Porfirio, A. & Meneses, A. (2006). Creating and Managing Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines. Cebu City, Philippines: Fisheries Improved Sustainable Harvest Project, Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc., and University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute, viii + 83 pp.


62Te

chni

cal G

uide

lines

for E

valu

atin

g th

e M

anag

emen

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Aqu

atic

, Coa

sts

and

Smal

l Isl

ands

Con

serv

atio

n Ar

eas

(E-K

KP3K

)

MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIESDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS

DIRECTORATE FOR CONSERVATION OF AREA AND FISH SPECIES

Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16, Gedung Mina Bahari III, Lt. 10, Jakarta Pusat 10110Telp/Fax : (021) 3522045

© 2012

DEcREE OF THE DIREcTOR GENERAl OF MARINE, · PDF fileArisetiarso Soemodinoto, Ph.D., The...

Documents

Transcript of DEcREE OF THE DIREcTOR GENERAl OF MARINE, · PDF fileArisetiarso Soemodinoto, Ph.D., The...