Decraene spie-09
-
Upload
mathieu-de-craene -
Category
Technology
-
view
501 -
download
0
Transcript of Decraene spie-09
Non-stationary Diffeomorphic
Registration: Application to
Endo-Vascular Treatment Monitoring
M. De Craene2,1,O. Camara1,2, B.H. Bijnens1,2,3, A.F. Frangi1,2,3
Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Barcelona Spain.
1. Information and Communication Technologies Department, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
2. Networking Center on Biomedical Research - Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN
3. Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA).
CONFIDENTIAL
Context.
Aneurysm Recurrence after Coiling
Causes Compaction of the coil mass
Aneurysm growth
Related factors Packing [Johnston,Kai]
Ratio between the volume of inserted coil and the aneurysm volume
Shown to be a strong predictor of aneurysm recurrence
Others [Cottier] Size
Treatment during the acute phase
Rupture status2
Example of “coil compaction” :
DSA image [Steinman]
Cottier et al. Neuroradiology 45, pp. 818–824, 2003.
Johnston et al. Stroke 39(1), pp. 120–125, 2008.
Kai et al. Neurosurgery 56, pp. 785–791, 2005.
Steinman et al. American Journal of Neuroradiology 24, pp. 559–566, 2003.
CONFIDENTIAL
Image-based quantification of aneurysm
recurrence and evolution over time
Objectives
Visualize several time points in a common frame of coordinates
Compute coil and aneurysm volume curves over time
Local deformation maps
3
t0 pre t0 post t1 pre
t1 post t2 pre t3 post
t4 pre t4 post t5 pre
CONFIDENTIAL
Characterize evolution using non-rigid
registration Local deformation
maps
Where is the aneurysm growing?
4
CONFIDENTIAL
Challenges
Accuracy for detecting small volume changes and retreat if necessary
Flexibility for detecting small and large volume changes
Depends on time follow-up interval, aneurysm location, …
Invertibility of the non-rigid mapping to ensure correctness of the volume change estimate
5
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
CONFIDENTIAL
Non-rigid registration and
diffeomorphisms Popular pairwise diffeomorphic registration schemes
Mainly optimize a dense velocity field
Higher computational cost, no implicit regularization as offered by FFD (except [Rueckert])
Simple optimization scheme based on first derivatives (except [Hernandez])
)
6
Acronym Transform. model Velocity field Joint
optimization
LDMM [Beg] Dense incr. disp.
field
Non-stationary Yes
Stationary LDDMM
[Herandez]
Dense vel. field Stationary Yes
Diff. FFD [Rueckert] FFD Non-stationary No
Diff. Demons
[Vercauteren]
Dense incr. disp.
field
Non-stationary No
Beg et al. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 61 (2), pp. 139–157, 2005.
Hernandez et al. MMBIA’07 , 2007.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
Vercauteren et al. MICCAI’07, LNCS 4792, pp. 319–326, 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL
LDFFD diffeomorphic non-rigid
registration Transformation = Concatenation of FFD transformations
Strong coupling between phases: the first transformation influences all subsequent time steps
Mutual information metric: ITK, Mattes´ implementation
LBFGS optimizer: ITK
7
time
v(x;t0) v(x;t1) v(x;t2) v(x;t3)
u(x;t2)
For k=1:M (number of time steps)
CONFIDENTIAL
LDFFD diffeomorphic non-rigid
registration
∆ metric ∆ intensity ∆ mapped coordinate ∆ transformation parameter
Parametric Jacobian
Similar expression can be found in LDDMM registration [Beg] when computing variational derivative
8
∆v(x;t0) v(x;t1) v(x;t2)
∆u(x;t2)
duM (x ; ! jM1 )
d! m
=dum (x ; ! jm1 )
d! m
M ¡ 1Y
l = m + 1
µ
I +dvM (y ; ! M )
dy
¶ ¯¯¯¯¯y = x + u l (x ;! j l
1)
Parametric Jacobian of mth
transformationJacobian of all transformations posterior
to m
Beg et al. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 61 (2), pp. 139–157, 2005.
CONFIDENTIAL
LDFFD diffeomorphic non-rigid
registration
Multi-resolution scheme in the temporal dimension
Initiate algorithm with 2 time steps
In the event that any of these parameters reaches a given threshold (0.4 the spacing between control points, as proposed by [Rueckert])
Interrupt optimization
Restore last set of valid parameters
Break the problematic time steps using square root computation [Arsigny]
9
with
ToldTnew Tnew
Arsigny et al. MICCAI’ 06, LNCS 4190, pp. 924-931, 2006.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
u(x;t2)
v(x;t0)
CONFIDENTIAL
Results: aneurysm volume changes
measured by non-rigid registration
11
Patient Reg. of t FFD [Rueckert99] Diff. FFD [Rueckert06] LDFFD
follow-u
ps
min max mean min max mean min max mean
1 t0t1 3 0.13 2.08 0.97 0.52 1.46 0.95 0.37 2.19 0.98
t1t2 24 -1.89 7.12 0.66 0.01 22.63 0.73 0.00 6.37 0.88
t2t3 2 0.03 2.15 0.95 0.53 1.64 0.95 0.50 1.70 0.97
t3t4 3 -0.10 2.61 0.98 0.60 1.68 0.96 0.19 4.06 0.97
2 t0t1 4 0.30 2.04 0.91 0.48 2.03 0.89 0.37 2.02 0.91
t1t2 12 -0.28 2.37 0.90 0.26 3.87 0.87 0.11 3.46 0.91
t2t3 12 -0.06 2.14 0.92 0.17 2.78 0.84 0.10 4.35 0.96
3 t0t1 3 0.24 3.37 0.92 0.41 2.99 0.88 0.32 2.91 0.93
t1t2 3 0.39 2.30 1.00 0.45 2.26 0.96 0.48 2.15 0.99
t2t3 2 0.14 2.69 0.97 0.43 2.31 0.90 0.29 3.29 0.97
t3t4 6 0.03 3.37 1.04 0.16 6.27 0.97 0.30 5.56 1.02
t4t5 2 -0.13 4.50 0.97 0.40 2.51 0.91 0.48 2.30 0.97
Rueckert et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(8), pp. 712-721, 1999.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
CONFIDENTIAL
Results: patient 1, second time point
12
t1 t2 LDFFD
[Rueck99
]
[Rueck06
]
[Verc06]Rueckert et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(8), pp. 712-721, 1999.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
Vercauteren et al. MICCAI’07, LNCS 4792, pp. 319–326, 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL
Results: patient 1, second time point
13
t1 t2 LDFFD
[Rueck99
]
[Rueck06
]
[Verc06]Rueckert et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(8), pp. 712-721, 1999.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
Vercauteren et al. MICCAI’07, LNCS 4792, pp. 319–326, 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL
Results: displacement fields
15
[Rueck99] LDFFD
[Rueck06
]
[Verc06]Rueckert et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(8), pp. 712-721, 1999.
Rueckert et al. MICCAI’06, LNCS 4191, pp. 702–709, 2006.
Vercauteren et al. MICCAI’07, LNCS 4792, pp. 319–326, 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL
Conclusions
LDFFD: non-stationary non-rigid registration algorithm
Dynamically finds the optimal number of time steps
Transformation invertibility
Keep the dimension of the optimization problem reasonably low
Applicable to quantify post interventional volume changes over subsequent follow-ups
Future work,
Exploit Jacobian-based local growth maps
Comparison to other coil compaction predictors published in the literature
Extension to motion and deformation estimation from image sequences: FIMH 09, Nice.
16
CONFIDENTIAL
Acknowledgements
This research has been partially funded by the Industrial and Technological Development Centre (CDTI) under the CENIT Programme (CDTEAM Project) and the Integrated Project @neurIST (IST-2005-027703), which is cofinancedby the European Commission.
The authors wish to acknowledge Elio Vivas for the acquisition of the intra-cranial aneurysm imaging data using 3D rotational angiography at Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Valles, Spain.
17