Decl of Ostella in Support of Plffs Opp and Obj to LOOT MTD and Amended MTD Doc 386

8/4/2019 Decl of Ostella in Support of Plffs Opp and Obj to LOOT MTD and Amended MTD Doc 386

1/95

Declaration of Lisa Ostella 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Philip J. Berg, EsquirePennsylvania I.D. 9867LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Telephone: (610) 825-3134E-mail:[email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI, et al

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORLY TAITZ, et al,

Defendants.

:

::::::::::::::

::

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)

DECLARATION OF LISA

OSTELLA

Date of Hearing: October 17, 2011Time of Hearing: 10:00 a.m.Location: Courtroom 10D

Declaration of Lisa Ostella

I, Lisa Ostella am over the age of 18 and am a party to the within action. I

have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and if called to do, I could and would

competently testify. I am making this Declaration under the penalty of perjury of

the Laws of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746.

1. I did work with Orly Taitz, herein referred to as Taitz. For a short time

I was a volunteer web master and assistant for defendant Taitz. But, other than

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 386 Filed 09/21/11 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#:8948


2/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

work concerning this lawsuit, Liberi, et al v. Taitz et al, I do not assist the Law

Offices of Philip J. Berg, or affiliated entities, as stated by Taitz, page 5, lines 26-8

MTD by LOOT.

2. In Taitz's Motion To Dismiss on behalf of the Law Offices of Orly

Taitz, herein referred to LOOT, Page 2, line 10 and on Page 5, line 27-28: Taitz

incorrectly rewrites this case with:

"...who blew the whistle on Berg, Liberi and Ostella, plaintiffs herein,

there was a prior dismissal in this case without prejudice and with a

certain stipulation and prior stipulation agreement was breached"

and

"...web master Lisa Ostella, who for a short time was a volunteer web

master for defendant Orly Taitz, but who is currently assisting Berg,

as well as their affiliated entities."

There was no whistle to blow on me. I told Taitz she had to find another web host

after she posted on the defendourfreedoms.us blog and sent out Dossier #5

"Dossier #5, additional cybercrimes, demand for immediate investigation and

prosecution", April 8, 2009. As her webhost and webmaster, I refused t

corroborate the hacking and cyber-crimes she was falsely claiming in that report. I

did not know the staff of the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg nor did I ever have

conversations with Philip J. Berg prior to this case, Liberi, et al v. Taitz, et al

which was filed in May 2009.



3/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. I did assist Mr. Berg in transitioning his website as well as updating it

for the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg back in June and July 2009 when his site was

taken over by a hacker. But I am not Berg's webmaster. His webmaster is a

witness in this case and was present in court August 2009 at a hearing for this case.

4. LOOT states on Page 6-7 line 15-28 and line 1:

"In November of 2008 Lisa Ostella approached Taitz and offered her

to create a blog (web site) for Taitz foundation DOFF. In March of

2009 donors reported to Taitz problems with Pay-pal donations. Taitz

had other concerns in regards to Ostella using the web site of

foundation for sales of T-shirts and other financial endeavors, where

Ostella did not provide Taitz, president of DOFF, with any accounting

or revenues for DOFF. Taitz advised Ostella, that she will be

transferring to another web master. Instead of providing a smooth

transfer Ostella locked Taitz out of the old web site for the foundation

and used the web site as well as list of donors to continuously seek

donations, which went to Ostella, not DOFF, Ostella also used the old

website to denigrate Taitz and promote competing attorney Berg.

Taitz was forced to create a new web site and lost significant amount

of donations due to actions of Ostella. Taitz wrote to attorney Berg

and asked him to cease and desist providing patronage to Ostella, who

was diverting funds from Taitz and DOFF."

and

Taitz advised Ostella, that she will be transferring to another web master.



4/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

transfer out of concerns of 'financial endeavors'. I told her to leave my services

due to lies and rumors of cyber-crimes Taitz was posting and reporting.

5. I did not approach Taitz. Taitz received my name from Markham

Robinson. Taitz started calling me and leaving voicemail messages in the fall of

2008. When I did return Taitz's call, Taitz requested my assistance in fighting

voter fraud. I was working on issues concerning The Help America Vote Act

(HAVA) with other organizations and agreed to become her assistant webmaster at

drorly.blogspot.com, this site is still published on the web. The head webmaster

Bob Stevens (I don't know his real name; but that is one of the names he went by),

installed a 3rd party software, JSKit, on drorly.blogspot.com at Taitz's consent

That software created so many issues with the site; that people really could not use

her site. I bought the domains: defendourfreedoms.us, defendourfreedoms.com

defendourfreedoms.org and defendourfreedoms.net. I started building a new

website and blog.

6. Neither Taitz nor Defend our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. (DOFF)

bought the domains or hosting services. Neither Taitz nor DOFF offered or paid

any money for the domains. See my declaration filed August 27, 2009; Docket

No. 107-1, which also have my receipts from my domain names.

This contradicts Taitz prior claims, as explained below. Taitz did not decide to



5/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7. I brought Taitz over to defendourfreedoms.us to use that blog when

drorly.blogspot.com started redirecting to pornographic websites.

8. Taitz had to be locked out of the defendourfreedoms.us site in Apri

2009 because she was publishing lies about the 'Obama Regime' hacking the site I

was responsible for and falsely accusing the 'Obama Regime' of stealing her

donations. See Dossier #5 attached as EXHIBIT 1.

9. I told Taitz to correct this report or find another web host and I was

willing to transfer my domains to her. Taitz could have even gone back to her

original site, drorly.blogspot.com. It is still published. It works fine without the

JSKit software plugin.

10. Taitz went on an East Coast AM radio show and told the public that I

stole money and hacked and hijacked the site, defendourfreedoms.us. The lies

continued from there and escalated. Due to Taitzs false allegations and stories, I

could not give her my domain names as I had to keep them in tact for this

litigation. This is explained in our Amended Complaint at pages 19-21, paragraphs

51-56. See also my declaration filed August 27, 2009, Docket No. 107-1.

11. Taitz is again falsely accusing me of selling T-shirts. Taitz raised

the issue about these T-Shirts previously in a declaration in support of her

AntiSLAPP Motion, filed May 27, 2011, docket #207. The T-Shirts were never

handled or sold on my defendourfreedoms sites nor were they ever under my



6/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

control. Evidence of which was filed May 31, 2011, see docket #212, Pages 4-6,

paragraphs i and p and pages 6-9; See also my previous declaration filed May

31, 2011, docket #213. The T-Shirts were handled by other assistants of Taitz on

other social networking and blog sites that I never visited nor had any type of login

for, see the website print-out showing that Lyn Shaw was one of the assistants

handling the T-shirt sales on behalf of defendant Taitz filed in our (Appellees)

Supplemental Appendice at pages J260-J262 and J277 filed November 7, 2010 in

Liberi et al v Taitz et al, 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Case #10-3000. I had

nothing to do with the T-Shirts.

12. Taitz submitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida

in the case ofRivernider v. U.S. Bank, Case No. 9:09-cv-81255-WPD, forged cut

and pasted versions of what she perpetuated the defendourfreedoms.us blogsite to

be to substantiate her false allegations against me that I was using her site to collect

monies, see Taitz filing in theRiverniderCase on January 21, 2010, Docket No. 50

attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2. None of these paper machete forged

representations of the defendourfreedoms.us blog even had information on them

about these T-Shirts, See my declaration in the RiverniderCase filed on January

13. There was a link to jewelry sales on DefendOurFreedoms.us, that

Taitz had me add to the blog site. The jewelry sales were set-up by another

26, 2010 as Docket No. 55-1, attached hereto as EXHIBIT "3".



7/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

moderator, Susan Hiller. I did not have anything to do with the sale of any

jewelry. Susan Hiller was an assistant moderator for DefendOurFreedoms.us tha

Taitz brought in to help filter comments on the blog. During this time, Taitz had

me working with the paralegal on the Military Lawsuit Taitz was filing against

President Obama. Susan Hiller's business, Long Stem Gems, was promoted by

Taitz personally. See

Gems.

14. Other 'financial endeavors' undertaken by Taitz was a Texas

collecting monies and credit card information from supporters to attend a

conference Taitz organized. I do not believe that conference took place. The

documents concerning that event were filed in my Affidavit in this case on

September 14, 2010, see Docket No. 144-9 and also in the third Circuit Court of

Appeals in Liberi, et al v. Taitz, et al,

document number 003110340436 in Plaintiffs (Appellees) Supplemental

Appendices at pages J224-J281.

15. Once I set-up Taitzs PayPal, Taitz changed the password and locked

me out, which is normal protocol. I had no reason to remain with access to it

However, Taitz never removed my email, contact name and phone number from

the account records after login rights were removed. Therefore, I continued to

EXHIBIT 4 attached hereto which is about Long Stem

conference that never took place. One of Taitz's assistant's, Lyn Shaw, was

Case No. 10-3000 on November 7, 2010



8/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

receive activity alerts from the DOFF PayPal. Activity alerts include payment

requests, like Ruben Nieto's money requests which have been filed in this case

several times, see Exhibits 132 and 133 filed May 20, 2011, Docket No. 190-

24. To date, every PayPal receipt Taitz has produced to prove she was missing

donations has been located in the PayPal records subpoenaed in this case and

proven by Taitzs PayPal records filed in this case May 20, 2011, see Exhibits 22

and 23, Docket No. 190-5. Taitz never made a report with PayPal about missing

or redirected funds.

16. My PayPal button and/or account was never on Taitz's active blog

defendourfreedoms.us. My PayPal button went up on defendourfreedoms.net

which was never used by Taitz for any of her activities. I received one donation of

$100 in support of our case, Liberi, et al v. Taitz, et al, after it was filed and

became discussed on numerous websites. This receipt, as well as my PayPa

records and my bank account records were filed in this case in the December 2010

Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) hearing. Those records still have not been

uploaded to the docket from Judge Robreno's court and can only assume they were

placed under seal. I am willing to re-file them if your Honor feels it is necessary.

17. Taitz made a false report to the Orange County Sheriffs Department

and other law enforcement authorities falsely stating that Lisa Liberi and I were the

same person and I stole $10,000 from her (Taitz). Taitz also spread this false



9/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

rumor to every person she could find associated with me as well as every customer

of Go Excel Global (GEG), my business. Taitz told these same people I had a

felony record and used various versions of the internet rap sheet she has

circulated. Taitz has continued to vary these stories and has not stopped promoting

these false stories for 3 years.

18. Taitz published my address, phone number and names of my family

to ensure her incited followers would take actions, which they have. Taitz has

posted on her site, stated during interviews and made sworn submissions to this

court as well as other courts that she received my contact information and Lisa

Liberis private data from LexisNexis, Choicepoint and Intelius. Taitz reported to

Orange County Sheriff's department that she hired The Sankey Firm, Neil Sankey

to run background checks on us, see the Orange County Sheriffs Department

Report filed by Orly Taitz in April 2009, filed as Exhibit 16 on May 20, 2011

Docket No. 190-4. Sankey did interviews stating he used LexisNexis and Intelius

to run these checks.

19. Taitz used the creditability of these database providers, Sankey's C.V.

her status as an Officer of the Court and a doctor, as well as the credentials of her

chosen 3rd party associates that my alleged criminal history was substantiated by

these individuals and database companies with status. The credibility status of

these authorities were also used in reporting to entities like the FBI, North



10/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Brunswick Police, NJ Consumer Affairs, all members of organizations I was

associated with. Customers of GEG, including my auction board, Breederville

neighbors, Senate Judiciary Committee, UN entities, etc. Because of this, I lost all

my clienteles, was kicked off my political boards, and was completely destroyed in

my line of work.

20. LexisNexis, Choicepoint and Intelius are the only sources that my

maiden name could have been obtained from. LexisNexis, Choicepoint and

Intelius are the only source my social security number could have been obtained

from that appeared on SlaveHack.com. Choicepoint is shown as accessing my

credit report through Equifax. Equifax has a wrong birthdate listed for me, which

also appears on my LexisNexis file and ChoicePoint file. A woman calling herself

Jane used that same wrong birthdate when she contacted me claiming to be my

'biological mother' during this time. Oddly enough, Jane is a name used by Taitz

on one of her MySpace profiles found in a Spokeo.com search using the email

[email protected]. Taitz uses many social profiles with various identities.

21. A social profile search using Spokeo.com of Taitz's emai

[email protected] shows that she also identifies herself as Anonymous

Anonymous is a hacktivist group (a hacktivist breaks into computer systems, for

politically motivated purposes) who also uses SlaveHack.com, where my socia

security number was published.



11/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

22. Many of Taitz's 3rd party agents that have assisted with propagation

of this case have displayed identifying alliances, logos and characteristics showing

they also belong to this hacktivist group, Anonymous. Members of Slavehack.com

use the flexibilities provided by the Daylight CIS middleware architecture built

into Oracle. Members of Anonymous recently hacked my children's school's

database provider.

23. Within the last week, I learned Intelius now sells background

information, albeit limited, on my minor children. I can supply your Honor with

the Intelius report I purchased from Intelius on my minor child under seal.

24. On Page 7, lines 10-18 of the MTD, LOOT states:

"...that the old web site was taken over by the former volunteer web

master Ostella and that any donations given to the old web site will

not benefit DOFF as Ostella replaced Taitz pay-pal account with her

own private account in connection to the pay-pal button on that old

web site. Taitz also posted on her web site a report by investigator

Sankey, which contained true and correct copy of Liberi's criminal

record, that he lawfully obtained from reputable databases gathering

records from reputable public sources, such as California Superior

court and bankruptcy court."

Taitz did not just advise of a site change. Taitz did radio interviews on AM

Satellite, TV shows, print interviews, phone calls, 3rd party outreach, and



12/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

continuous publications stating I stole monies, hacked and hijacked the site to

thwart a movement with political dissidents and incited for retaliation.

25. On Page 9, lines 1-13, LOOT states in her MTD:

"...In 68 of the first amended complaint, Plaintiffs adopted Taitz

alleged web posting, that "the information she was obtaining came

from databases: Lexis Nexis and Choice Point. (FAC 68). Plaintiffs

followed up that allegation with another allegation that "defendant

Orly Taitz already had Liberi and Ostella's private information from

the Reed Defendants and Defendants Intellius, Inc(FAC70). So,

based on Plaintiffs' own allegations in the FAC, under the

Communications Decency Act Taitz or her law office LO, as a user of

an interactive computer service, cannot be treated as the publisher or

speaker of information provided by another information content

provider such as Lexis Nexis, Intellius and Choicepoint. What is

more, Plaintiffs admit that Neil Sankey first circulated the article,

which claimed that Liberi had an extensive criminal record going back

to the 90s(FAC 63) and that it was Sankey, who provided Taitz with

the e-mail address containing Liberi's information(FAC69)."

Taitz requested Sankey to run background checks on Plaintiffs. Sankey did not do

these checks on his own initiative. Taitz admits this in the Orange County

Sheriffs Department Report she filed against Lisa Liberi and me, see Exhibit 16

filed May 20, 2011, Docket No. 190-4, ;third paragraph on page four. Sankey

was needed to run the checks to create a link to pull the information in the database



13/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

providers, Lexis/Reed Defendants and Defendant Intelius, for the back en

information to be pulled by Yosef Taitz. Yosef Taitz in his professional capacity as

CEO through his company, Defendant Daylight CIS, used the embedded access

from his software access into the Oracle architecture. Sankey just received the

front end reports. But, having Sankey run the reports, created access for Yosef

Taitz to obtain the full reports with more information. Sankey is also on record in

an interview that when he brought his information to Taitz, she already had the

information.

26. Then, on Page 15, lines 20-24, LOOT, a Law Office, States:

"Moreover, as an attorney and an officer of the court Taitz was

obligated to warn her supporters and donors, that her old web site was

taken over and the fact that a person with recent serious convictions of

grand theft has access to their financial information."

Taitz does not warn her supporters and donors of anything. What Taitz has done is

created false stories and falsely accuses me of crimes and continues to do this to

this day. Taitz told her followers and every person she could find in my persona

associations, every customer she could find of GEG and Breederville, every

organization I was involved with and filed false reports with NJ Consumer affairs,

North Brunswick Police, FBI, Federal and State Politicians and with her County

Sheriff, see the Orange County Sheriffs Department Report filed as Exhibit 16

on May 20, 2011, Docket No. 190-4 in the first paragraph on page four where



14/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Taitz falsely states I stole $10,000 from her, I had a criminal record and that Lisa

Liberi and I are the same person.

27. I did add Phil Berg's Law office link to the blog roll of

DefendOurFreedoms.Net. That was only a hyperlink to his site. I was not in

contact with Berg or his staff prior to the filing of this case. Taitz stated

"Moreover, as an attorney and an officer of the court Taitz was obligated to warn

her supporters and donors, that her old web site was taken over and the fact that a

person with recent serious convictions of grand theft has access to their financia

information." See Taitz filing, page 15, lines 20-24. So I had to preserve my

domain names to protect myself from Taitzs false statements and this case had to

be filed for protection from Taitz criminal actions and false statements.

28. Further, on Page 17, lines 22-28, LOOT States:

"Again, the plaintiff is talking about Taitz posting a report about her

criminal record and about actions of Ostella locking Taitz out of her

web site. The Plaintiffs never plead any specific facts, that are not

true. Plaintiffs did not satisfy the second prong, as they did not plead

anything highly offensive, that would injure the reputation of the

Plaintiffs."

29. I do not have a criminal record. Yet Taitz reported, published, and

enlisted third parties to propagate otherwise. This created ostracisation of the

entire Ostella family from friends and neighbors in their former place of residence



15/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This caused the whole family to have to move and move fast. This created the loss

of my entire business. This created humiliation. These accusations, presented as

facts, backed by credentials of theft caused the Ostella familys need to move

Caused retaliation on behalf of Taitz followers with the incitement by Taitz that

Ostella stole their monies. Publishing a persons contact information and reaching

out to everyone they know with a falsified criminal history and accusations of theft

of a foundation are highly offensive to anyone and absolutely injured this plaintiff's

reputation. As well as this plaintiff's family. This information remains on the

internet to this day further lending credibility to Taitz's falsified stories.

30. LOOT Also States at Page 18, lines 21-26:

"Taitz posted information about Liberi and Ostella not to sell a

product, but to worn the public about criminal past of Liberi and

diversion of funds by Ostella. What was portrayed by Taitz, was not

likeness of Liberi and Ostella, but their actions, which were of public

concern."

Lisa Liberi's and Lisa Ostella's names were posted as akas as well as addresses

maiden names, phone numbers, and other personal identifying information as well

as family member's to create a flash mob affect among political dissidents. Money

was raised and received by Taitz to compensate a martyr status that Taitz created



16/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with false stories, forged documents and create a straw-man for plausible

deniability, at Ostella and Liberi's expense.

31. LOOT then states at Page 19, lines 1-4:

"In reality, the opposite is true. Liberi used likeness and trade mark of

Taitz's not for profit foundation and solicited donations, while Liberi

and Berg benefitted from those actions of Ostella, as she locked Taitz

out of her old web site and used that web site to promote law office of

Berg. This will be addressed in cross complaint against the

defendants."

Lisa Liberi never had access to any of the defendourfreedoms sites. Not even since

this suit was filed. Once Taitz's login access was removed in April 2009, I have

been the only one logging into that site and no data has been deleted. There are

some items I have had to un-publish; but all data remains in that blogsite. I added

blog roll links to the sidebar of the DefendOurFreedoms.NET site. The links wen

to: the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Mario Apuzzo, Alan Keyes, Evelyn Adams

radio show, Patriots Heart Broadcasting Network, The Dave Levine Show, and

Country First web forum. These were just navigational links. They were not paid

advertisements or anything else that depended on the functionality of the

DefendOurFreedoms.NET blog site. The owners of those sites did not ask to have

them added. The owners of the sites were not promised anything in return. They

were just blog roll links. None of these links were any indication that I was



17/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

working with anybody. I did not start speaking with Philip J. Berg until I was

forced to file this case by Orly Taitz's damaging actions. The only work I

performed for Philip J. Berg outside of this court action was a one time favor of

getting his websites back up after his site was attacked and taken over in June/July

2009, after our suit was filed. I was not his webmaster. His webmaster was at the

August 2009 hearing and is a witness in this case.

32. LOOT then states at Page 20-21, lines 8-28 and 1-8:

"In the seventh claim plaintiffs allege three causes of action, two of

which have no basis for relief under California law: Cyber-

Harassment and Cyber-Bullying. See generally cyber-harassment and

cyber-bullying. See generally, United States v. Drew, 259 F.R.D. 449

(C.D. cal. 2009). the final tort of cyber-stalking is organized to the

extend that it merely an allegation of stalking, codified under

California civil code 1708.7. In order to establish the tort of stalking

Plaintiff must allege the following four elements (1) that LO "engaged

in a pattern of conduct the intend of which was to follow, alarm or

harass them"; (2) that, as a result of the alleged pattern of conduct,

Plaintiff reasonably feared for their safety, or that their safety, or that

of an immediate family member; (3) that part of the alleged pattern of

conduct was a credible threat with the intention of placing Plaintiffs in

reasonable fear for their safety, or that of an immediate family

member; and (4) on at least one occasion, the Plaintiff clearly and

definitively, but unsuccessfully, demanded that the defendant stop the



18/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

pattern of conduct. Cal Civ Code 1708.7. None of the prongs were

satisfied or could be satisfied in this case.

This case revolves around publication made by defendants regarding

behavior of the Plaintiffs. The complaint is void of any facts that

would show defendants ever following or harassing any of the

defendants. The only credible allegation consists of fact that attorney

Taitz published information about her website being taken over by

webmaster Ostella and about criminal history of Liberi, assistant of

Berg. Taitz, also apprised her supporters of the hearing in this case

and pleadings submitted. All of the publications represented matter of

public concern. Those publications might have made Liberi alarmed

that her probation might be revoked. Berg might have been alarmed

that he would be found guilty of ethical violations at his disciplinary

board trial, as Liberi was his main witness, Ostella might have been

alarmed that there might be charges brought against her for diverting

funds from DOFF, but there is no credible fact plead by the Plaintiffs

to show, that the Plaintiffs were afraid for their lives."

In all of Taitz's actions, she presented herself as an Officer of the Court. Taitz, as

an officer of the court, presented to courtrooms, international entities, political

offices, law enforcement offices, online, offline, in print, on air through feeds

through mail and through the phone, to the extent of thousands of reports that I

have or had a felony record, stole from a foundation, hacks, conspires and

presented me as an enemy placed to unseat a dissident movement.



19/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

33. Taitz even came to New Jersey, drove around my place of residence

and my children's school with the sole purpose of making threats to my family.

34. After this threatening drive by, at least one picture of my minor

daughter appeared published on the Internet in a social network site that neither

me, nor my daughter ever even knew existed. Yet this same social network site

where the picture(s) were published does appear under Taitz's profile with the title

of a known hacktivist group, 'Anonymous'.

35. Threats were made known to a 3rd party witness that Taitz targeted

my children after this case was filed. Those threats were reported. Due to the

threats and outreach of Taitz's lies and actions, we moved for our safety and the

safety of our family.

36. LOOT then states Page 22, lines 21-24:

"Moreover, during December 20, 2010 hearing Liberi and Ostella

admitted that Liberi indeed had felony convictions in 2008..."

I never addressed information about Lisa Liberi. It is not my information to speak

of. However, I did address the fact that Taitz propagated a record of felony

convictions that she applied to me.

I declare under the penalty of perjury of the Laws of the United States and

the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.



20/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Executed this 19th

day of September, 2011 in the State of New Jersey.

Lisa Ostella, Declarant



21/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28EXHIBIT 1

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 386-1 Filed 09/21/11 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#:8968


22/95

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ26302 La Paz ste 211Mission Viejo CA 92691ph 949-683-5411fax [email protected]

04.08.09.

Attorney General Eric Holder;Solicitor General Elena Kagan;Director of FBI Robert Mueller;FBI Cyber Crime division, Orange County CA,Officer Nathan LeDirector of Secret Service Mark Sullivan;Chief of Security of the Supreme Court,Officer Christine Giaccio;Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts;

Legal Counsel to the Chairman of JointChiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen, Captain Crawford

Via Certified mail, return receipt, restricted delivery addressee only

Dossier #5in the form ofopen letter posted on the internet and forwarded to 26,000 outlets of US and international media

Further instances of cyber crimes, follow up information onevidence of forgery of Barack Obama's Selective ServiceCertificateAs I have previously reported, some party or parties have changed the e-mail address in my

foundation pay-pal account in order to prevent me from getting donations and fighting all thesuspected criminal activities perpetrated by Barack Obama and his supporters. Similarly, it wasreported to me yesterday by the TV Host/ Producer Mr. William Wagoner, that a clock on the statcounter of my lead interview clip on youtube was turned back to show lower number of views.According to Mr. Wagoner after only two days post release, the clip showed some 3,000 views. Aday later it showed 1600 views only. Similar activity was seen on my blog counter. Please, see inattachment correspondence with a veteran Mr. Roger Beckham in regards to the change of the e-mail address in my pay pal account and correspondence between producer Mr. Wagoner and Mr.Michael Wandken, that showed similar turning clock on stat counter on youtube.

While changing an e-mail address in the paypal account is a direct financial attack, turning theclock on stat counters on the blog and youtube is both a psychological attack and an indirectfinancial attack. It is designed to discourage and brake the will of dissidents and also to preventthem from getting advertising dollars, as typically advertisers are looking for advertising stat

summaries. I demand an immediate investigation and prosecution of individuals involved in suchactivities. I believe there is a connection between parties involved in these cyber crimes and onesinvolved in other crimes that I reported before, such as erasing information on my case Lightfoot vBowen, from the docket of the Supreme Court on January 21, right after the inauguration ofObama; ones that manufactured the decision of a Virginia judge, in order to defraud Americanvoters one day before the election, ones that were involved in posting Microsoft virus warnings toparties going on my prior blog, that was hosted on Google, ones that were involved in erasing anarticle about me from Wikipedia and had a banner in Arabic showing hanging of SaddamHussein.

Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 80-4 Filed 10/02/09 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1574

Exb "1", pg. 22



23/95

This dossier also provides a follow up on the matter of reported evidence of forgery of Obama'sSelective Service Certificate. Daniel Amon was the person, that sent an e-mail stating that BarackObama signed for selective service on September 4, 1980 in Hawaii (when Obama was actuallyat Occidental college in California, thousands of miles away from Hawaii). Please see anattached article by Eric Rosenberg, Hearst Newspapers, Washington. Daniel Amon was aspokesperson for the director of the Selective Service William Chatfield in sexual harassmentcomplaint filed, where the plaintiff was seeking $350,000 in damages and termination of Mr.Chatfield's employment. Mr. Chatfield might be compromised in his position as a director of theSelective Service. See in the attachment evidence by the federal agent Stephen Coffman, thatwas forwarded to me by the web master on November 25, 2008.To remind you, I have provided information in dossier #1 in regards to numerous areas of thecertificate that show signs of forgery. Notably, the top right corner of the certificate shows anumber starting with 08 (signifies the document to be prepared in 2008). Below in explanationsanother 8 was added before the number to make it look as if the document was prepared in 1980.It is a clear evidence of the document being forged and backdated. Additionally, the documentshows a stamp, supposedly used in 1980, while this stamp was discontinued in 1970, wrong formnumber and numerous other signs of forgery. As of yet no answer was received and noinvestigation was done. This is extremely important, since not signing up for selective servicemakes one ineligible for work in executive branch, particularly in the top position of the executivebranch- position of the president and Commander in Chief of all US Military.

Original Dossier #1 was sent in the beginning of March, over a month ago, together with the QuoWarranto demand. As of yet no response was received, Quo Warranto proceedings were notinstituted, criminal investigation was not commenced yet. Refusal by law enforcement officials toprosecute criminal activities, makes such officials complicit of such activities, makes themaccessories after the fact, aiding and abetting such crimes and being culpable of Misprison ofFelony. (Title 18, USC)

Sincerely

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQelectronic signature

--- On Sun, 3/8/09, Roger Beckham redacted wrote:

From: Roger Beckham redacted

Subject: RE: Unclaimed Paypal Payment

To: "'Orly Taitz'" redacted

Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 3:05 PM

Orly:

I suspected something was being tampered with; hence, my questions to you concerning this. Iwant you to get all the donations coming to you including my small one. I will be sending youmore later.


Exb "1", pg. 23



24/95

I am a retired Federal Government employee (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and a disabled U.S.Navy veteran in addition to being a 12

thgeneration American on my fathers side, and maybe

more on my Grandmother Penns line. John Penn from NC and one of the Signers of theDeclaration of Independence is in her/my line as well as William the Quaker Penn. GeorgeWalton from GA and another Signer is in my wifes line.

I really appreciate you persistence in this important matter, and am willing to help you in any waythat I can. I realize how extremely busy you must be, and I appreciate your taking time out of youschedule to correspond with me!

God bless you!

Roger Beckham

12th

Generation AMERICAN

From: Orly Taitz [mailto: [email protected] ]

Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:35 PMTo: Roger Beckham


Roger

I finally figured, what happened. Somebody tempered with my pay pal account, actually

went into account and changed it from [email protected] to [email protected] - a

non-existant account for paypal. I guess it was done intermittently, so I got some

donations, but very little. Lisa Ostella, my web master will report it to her carrier "go

daddy", she will see if this e-mail is not taken, we will add it. I will send an additional

report to Attorney General-Eric Holder, though he is Obama's appointee... We are

dealing with dirty mafia, running the country. Please, see the letter to Attorney General,that I posted, you will see the nightmare I had to go through so far

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

26302 La Paz ste 211

Mission Viejo Ca 92691


Exb "1", pg. 2



25/95

29839 S. Margarita Pkwy

Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411fax 949-586-2082


From: Roger Beckham redactedSubject: RE: Unclaimed Paypal Payment

To: [email protected]


I clicked on the Donate icon on your webpage. It automatically sends the payment to

[email protected] . RB

From: Orly Taitz [mailto: [email protected] ]

Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:45 PMo: Roger Beckham


Mr. Beckham,

pay-pal needs to know, which e-mail address did you use to send the donation? did youuse this one [email protected] ?

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

26302 La Paz ste 211

Mission Viejo Ca 92691

29839 S. Margarita Pkwy

Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411fax 949-586-2082


From: Roger Beckham redacted


Exb "1", pg.



26/95




I cancelled the Feb. 25 Paypal donation that remained unclaimed. I resubmitted it today and itis unclaimed as of this message.

Roger Beckham

12th

Generation AMERICAN

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:19:34 AMTo:orly taitz Download All | SelectiveServiceLtr.JPG (261KB); Obama'sDraftRegistration.jpg (1537KB);

Obama'sSelectiveServicePrintout.jpg (400KB); selectiveserviceenvelope2.JPG (118KB)Orly, I do not know if this material can be folded into a lawsuit or useful to anyone, but here is thedetective work done by Lisa Ostella on this issue:

http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2008/11/14/barack-obama--daniel-amon--sssgov--many-questions.aspx

Below are some scans by the person who did the FOIA request. Be careful who you send theseto since the people who signed the cover letter etc could go to prison for falsifying governmentdocuments, or for releasing Selective Service Administration registration records (which acourt ruling a while back indicated was illegal).

Can these be of use?

Bob

Note: forwarded message attached.

-----Inline Message Follows-----

Attached, if I did it correctly, is a jpg file image of the letter I received from the Selective Service when I received the copy of the registrationform. I also attached copies of the files I sent to www.debbieschlussel.com. And finally, I attached a copy of the envelope with my addressand the postal optical code for my address removed. Otherwise the documents are in their orginal condition. They were scanned in usinga HP 1300 printer/scanner. The address information on the letter was first blacked out with a felt tip pen on a copy of the letter. However,when scanned it still showed through so I removed my personal information from the envelope and the letter using Microsoft's paint

program.

Please let me know if you need anything else. Also please keep me posted if you wouldn't mind.

Stephen

4 Images |View Slideshow | Download Selected | Download All


Exb "1", pg.



27/95

SelectiveServiceLtr.JPG(261KB)

Obama'sDraftRegistration.jpg(1537KB)

Obama'sSelectiveServicePrintout.jpg(400KB)

selectiveserviceenvelope2.JPG(118KB)

CHIEF OF SELECTIVE SERVICE ACCUSED OFHARASSMENT, RETALIATIONSubmitted by davidswanson on Fri,2007-05-11 04:08. MediaBy ERIC ROSENBERG, Hearst NewspapersWASHINGTON _ William Chatfield, the chiefof the U.S. Selective Service System, isunder fire from two agency employees _ onewho alleges that he sexually harassed herand another who claims that Chatfieldretaliated against him for corroborating thefemale employees account.Delores Spencer-Jefferies, 46, claims thatChatfield, a Bush administration appointeefrom Dallas, made sexually suggestivecomments to her on Feb. 22, 2006, in anexchange witnessed by Willie Blanding, 59, asenior official at the agency.Both Blanding, a 10-year agency employee,and Spencer-Jefferies, a seven-yearemployee, have filed federal EqualEmployment Opportunity complaints with theagency.Spencer-Jefferies complaint is scheduled tobe decided by an administrative judge at theEqual Employment Opportunity Commissionin Washington by mid-June. Blandingscomplaint is under investigation by theSelective Service Systems EqualEmployment Opportunity office; Blanding hasrequested that his case also be heard by anEEOC judge.Spencer-Jefferies says she resorted to thecomplaint after Chatfield refused to apologizefor him remark. She is asking for Chatf ields

removal as director and monetary damagesof $350,000. Blanding is seeking $35,000 indamages.Blanding has held a number of top positionsat the agency, serving at various times asthe deputy director _ the second highest


Exb "1", pg.



28/95

official _ as well as the chief operatingofficer, executive director and the agencysequal employment opportunity director.Spencer-Jefferies works as an accountanttechnician in the agencys office of financialmanagement.Dan Amon, an agency spokesman, confirmedthat the two employees have filed sexualharassment and retaliation charges against

Chatfield. Amon said that Chatfield, who hasled the agency since November 2004, deniesthe allegations.Chatfield declined an interview request todiscuss the charges.Prior to his appointment, Chatfield was agovernment affairs consultant in businesswith former Rep. Tom Kindness, R-Ohio. Healso served in the Reagan administration inthe Department of Defense, Civil AeronauticsBoard, Office of Personnel Management,Consumer Product Safety Commission,Department of Interior and InterstateCommerce Commission, according to theSelective Service Systems website.Richard Flahavan, the chief spokesman atagency, added that ``the status ofSpencer-Jefferies and Blanding complaints is

that they both are being worked in EEOchannels, the facts are being determined,and, therefore, it is too early for anyresolution.The Selective Service System, a householdname among young American men of draftage, is a small agency by federal governmentstandards, with an annual budget of about$23 million and a staff of 61 people at itsheadquarters in suburban Arlington, Va. Itspeacetime mission is centered on registeringmen for the draft and ensuring that thegovernment has the infrastructure in place toconduct a military draft if required.In her complaint, Spencer-Jefferies saysChatfield and his chief of staff, Ernest Garcia,encountered Blanding and Spencer-Jefferiesin the hallway at agency headquarters and

that Chatfield ``looked me up and down . . .lustfully and stated, `Hey, you know, Ernieand I dont think that Willie appreciatesyou.Spencer-Jefferies said she responded: ``No,I think that Mr. Blanding appreciates myfriendship.Chatfield replied, ``No. We dont think so.But Ernie and I sure would appreciate you,Spencer-Jefferies says.Spencer-Jefferies said she sought an apologyfrom Chatfield within a month of theincident, but when she didnt receive one shesubsequently filed her complaint on June 15,2006, according to her charging documents.In her complaint, Spencer-Jefferies says: `Ìwas humiliated and embarrassed by hiscomment. My thought was, Àm I supposed

to be the agency whore?`Àfter looking at the shock on my face, Mr.Chatfield immediately retreated to hisoffice, she said.In his affidavit, Blanding supports herversion of the events, calling Chatfieldscomments to her `ìnappropriate.Chatfield, in his affidavit, says thatSpencer-Jefferies misunderstood hiscomments that she took for sexualharassment. Chatfield claims that he onlytold her, `Ì hope you appreciate Mr.Blanding as we do.


Exb "1", pg. 2



29/95

Garcias recollection of the events haschanged over time. At first, ``Garcia statedthat he had no recollection of the incident,according to the investigation into hercharge. But later, in a sworn affidavit lastOctober, Garcia said he supported Chatfieldsversion of events.Ever since he corroborated Spencer-Jeffriesaccount, Blanding says in his own April 4,

2007, complaint claiming retaliation, ``Mywork environment has been a living hell.Blanding says that Chatfield has edged himout of his position as associate director formobilization, one of the agencys top postsresponsible for overseeing the creation ofdraft boards, field offices and stateheadquarters if a draft is ever reestablished.``I have been reassigned from all myduties, Blanding said in anApril 9 letter toSen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., seeking herhelp.Despite the fact that he has a salary of over$155,000 that puts him on the top salaryrung for senior federal employees, Blandingsays that he has been ``parked and``given zero to doand that he has beenstripped of all of his subordinates.

Amon, Chatfields spokesman, acknowledgesthat Blanding has been reassigned, butmaintains that he receives the same salaryas before and given the title of ``senioradviser to the director.Blanding ``was notdemoted, Amon said in a statement. (E-mail: eric(at)hearstdc.com)

---- Original Message -----

From:Michael WarnkenTo:William J. Wagenerent: Monday, April 06, 2009 04:29Subject: Re: Number of hits

Bill,

On the attached document I have the true number of hits on the videos you ran on my case. It is in the tens of thousands which is muchmore than U-Tube shows. It was wonderful seeing that. It bothers me that U-Tube is actively discounting the true number of views.

That means my case is being watched by far more people!

Michael

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Michael Warnken redacted wrote:Bill,

I am not sure if you post on this website, but you and I have discussed the problem with UTube and its tally's. Well, this website shows thatI have hits in the tens of thousands on my clips!

http://www.vnseopro.com/tag/warnken.aspx

Two of them have over 70,000 hits! UTube is holding the number count back on purpose it seems, but this site is showing the actual

number of hits!

Wow!!!! I thought you'd like to know this. This means people are watching what I am doing and they are considering what I am saying. All ofa sudden, I don't fee; so alone!

Michael


Exb "1", pg.



30/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT 2

30



31/95

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2010 Page 49 of 54Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 386-1 Filed 09/21/11 Page 11 of 13 Page ID#:8978


32/95



33/95



34/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT 3

34



35/95

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 55-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2010 Page 1 of 55

Exb "3", pg. 3



36/95


Exb "3", pg. 3



37/95


Exb "3", pg. 3



38/95


Exb "3", pg. 3



39/95


Exb "3", pg. 3



40/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



41/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



42/95


Exb "3", pg.



43/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



44/95

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 55-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2010 Page 10 of55

Exb "3", pg.



45/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



46/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



47/95


Exb "3", pg. 4



48/95

From: [email protected]


Subject: RE: Individual Lawforms you ordered & receiptDate: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:25:29 -0500

THANK YOU!!!

And great customer service too!

Lisa Ostella

1-732-846-2875

Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:16:00 -0800

From: [email protected]: [email protected]

Subject: Re: Individual Lawforms you ordered & receipt

Dear Lisa Ostella,

Thank you for your order. Save this e-mail, it is your credit card

receipt.

Your credit card has been charged $10.00.

Your Credit Card Receipt and Approval code # is found at the bottom of

this letter.

The individual form(s) you ordered are attached to this e-mail.

982(a)(15.2)* replaced by SUBP-010.DOC

Instructions can be found at:

http://www.lawca.com/instruct.html

http://www.lawca.com

If you do not have Microsoft Word you can use Word Viewer to fill in

the

forms. You can obtain Word Viewer from:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=95e24c87-8732-

48d5-8689-ab826e7b8fdf&DisplayLang=en


Exb "3", pg. 4



49/95

============================

Lisa Ostella

622 Remsen Ave

North Brunswick

NJ

08902

732-846-2875

[email protected]

1347470469175965

=============================

RECEIPT:

LAWCA CORP.

10580 N. MCCARREN BLVD

RENO, NV 89503-0000

7752788937

Store #1001124943

01/19/09 10:13:49 AM

eCommerce Sale

Billing Address

Lisa Ostella

622 Remsen Ave

North Brunswick , NJ 08902

Credit Card Information

CREDIT CARD NUMBER: Visa ....5031

SWIPE CARD: No

STATUS: APPROVED - 134747

ORDER NUMBER: Lisa Ostella01.19.2009


Exb "3", pg. 4



50/95

PO NUMBER: individual forms

Qty Unit Cost Extended Cost

1 10.00 10.00SUBTOTAL: $10.00

TOTAL: $10.00

I AGREE TO PAY ABOVE AMOUNT ACCORDING TO CARD ISSUER.

SIGNATURE X____________________________________________________

Lisa Ostella=============================

*Important billing information. Please remember our credit card billing

name: Our credit card charge will appear on your card as charged by

LawCA or Fresno LaserGraphics, Inc. We apologize, but in order to

maintain our low prices ...Our credit card company charges $20.00 for

disputes. If you dispute this charge and the dispute is settled in our

favor, your card will be charged this amount.


Exb "3", pg.



51/95


Exb "3", pg. 5



52/95


Exb "3", pg.



53/95


Exb "3", pg. 5



54/95

Exb. "3", pg. 54



55/95

Exb. "3", pg. 55



56/95



Subject: Fax NumberDate: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:17:04 -0500

Fred, can you give me your fax number so I can send you a subpoena to serve PatrickFitzgerald.

Thanks.

Lisa Ostella

Peace through Strength

http://www.barofintegrity.com

Hotmail goes where you go. On a PC, on the Web, on your phone. See how.

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.


Exb "3", pg. 5



57/95



Subject: RE: Fax NumberDate: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:49:40 -0500

Faxing to you as I type, 2 subpoenas. 1 for Patrick Fitzgerald, 1 of the main US Attorneyoffice in Chicago. Included is a page called Attachment 3. That goes with eachsubpoena. There also are 2 proofs of service that need to be filled out by whomever does

the serving. The Executive Order they serving is being done under is also included.

Now, Orly wanted the case filings to be included with these subpoenas. I did snail mailthose case filings with my subpoenas. If you want to included them with the hand

delivered ones, I can fax those too. But I will have to do that when I get back. I need to

leave to get my kids from school. The case filings are a total of 45 pages.

Do you want those sent too? Or do you the the receipt of them in mail is enough?

Lisa Ostella

Defend Our Freedoms Foundationhttp://defendourfreedoms.org

Peace through Strength

http://www.barofintegrity.com1-732-846-2875

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:22:03 -0600Subject: Re: Fax Number

From: [email protected]: [email protected]

Hi Lisa:

You can try 847-328-3733.

If that doesn't work I need to use our home number with my other fax machine which isnot on a dedicated line.

Fred


Exb "3", pg. 57



58/95

Exb "3", pg. 58



59/95

Exb "3", pg. 59



60/95


Exb "3", pg. 60



61/95

65K View Download

7328462875_090126_146627790.pdf

Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.

Windows Live: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. Check it out.


Exb "3", pg. 61



62/95

From: [email protected]: [email protected]: FW: MyFax Delivery from 7328462875

Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:31:40 -0500

PDF form of Subpoenas attached.

I'll have more tomorrow, ok?

Thanks.

Lisa OstellaDefend Our Freedoms Foundation

http://defendourfreedoms.orgPeace through Strength



Exb "3", pg. 62



63/95


Exb "3", pg. 63



64/95


Exb "3", pg. 64



65/95


Exb "3", pg. 6



66/95


Exb "3", pg. 6



67/95

Windows Live Hotmail:more than just e-mail. Check it out.

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.

7328462875_090128_147349991.pdf

191K View Download


Exb "3", pg. 6



68/95

ACTUAL COPIES OF THE SUBPOENA

FORMS FAXED TO THE PROCESS SERVERS


Exb "3", pg. 68



69/95


Exb "3", pg. 6



70/95


Exb "3", pg. 7



71/95


Exb "3", pg. 71



72/95


Exb "3", pg. 7



73/95


Exb "3", pg. 73



74/95


Exb "3", pg. 74



75/95Exb "3", pg. 75



76/95

The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.

Lisa Ostella

Peace through Strengthhttp://www.barofintegrity.com

Windows Live Hotmailmore than just e-mail. See how it works.

Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.


Exb "3", pg. 76



77/95


Exb "3", pg. 7



78/95Exb "3", pg. 78



79/95Exb "3", pg. 7



80/95

Exb "3", pg. 8



81/95


Exb "3", pg. 81



82/95

Exb "3", pg. 8



83/95

The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.

Lisa Ostella

Peace through Strengthhttp://www.barofintegrity.com

Windows Live Hotmailmore than just e-mail. See how it works.



Exb "3", pg. 83



84/95


To: [email protected]: Patrick Fitzgerald Letter

Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:40:36 -0500

Orly,

This Patrick Fitzgerald letter you faxed to me yesterday, this is a cover letter to go outwith the subpoenas to be mailed today?

Second paragraph, 'These are the documents that I would consider most crucial....' insert

what we created for Attachment 3 here?

Then customize it for all subpoenas and send regular mail?

Lisa OstellaPeace through Strength


Windows Live: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. Check it out.



Exb "3", pg. 84



85/95


Exb "3", pg. 85



86/95


Exb "3", pg. 86



87/95

Defend Our FreedomsEvery major political movement starts not in Washington but it starts with thegrassroots-D.L. Hunter

Ed Hale at Plains Radio and His Guest Ralph - PayPalGate

Previous threads:

http://defendourfreedoms.net/2009/04/12/understanding-the-internet-101.aspx Understanding the Internet 101

http://defendourfreedoms.net/2009/04/14/understanding-the-internet-102--paypalgate.aspxUnderstanding the Internet 102 - PayPalGate

http://defendourfreedoms.net/2009/04/15/part-2--understanding-the-internet-102--paypalgate.aspxPart 2 - Understanding the Internet 102 - PayPalGate

On Ed Hale's Plains Radio Station Show this evening, my PayPal Account again has come into question. Ifanyone knows his guest Ralph, please forward this link to him. The specific date of January 18th was being

questioned. Here are are screen shots:


Exb "3", pg. 87



88/95

As you can see, I sent Orly Taitz $500.00 in December. I sent it to her Yahoo email account that is labeledOrly Taitz. The PayPal I had a login for was under her Gmail account, [email protected]. That site was

labeled Defend our Freedoms Foundation that I was listed as a cutomer service contact for at my

hotmail email and my 800#.

That $500.00 I sent Orly was to cover the Lightfoot v. Bowen filing. Once she started getting donations,

she refunded it to me.

5/25/2009 8:41 PMDrOrly,PayPalGateCategories:

Posted by Defend Our Freedoms at

What did you think of this article?

Liked

Disliked

No Opinion

Vote & See ResultsVote & See Results


Exb "3", pg. 8



89/95

-->

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URL for this entry

No trackbacks exist for this entry.

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)


Exb "3", pg. 89



90/95


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 4

90



91/95

From: [email protected]: [email protected]; [email protected]: [email protected]: RE: I have an ideaDate: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:29:57 -0400

Merchant added to blog and main site.

Lisa OstellaDefend Our Freedoms Foundationhttp://defendourfreedoms.orgPeace through Strengthhttp://www.barofintegrity.com

Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 10:54:29 -0700From: [email protected]: Re: I have an ideaTo: [email protected]: [email protected]; [email protected]

Lisacan you put on the side, that this merchant donates $25 from each item sold, to the foundation?Can you check the link to the att gen letter, it doesn't workthanks

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

26302 La Paz ste 211Mission Viejo Ca 92691

29839 S. Margarita PkwyRancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411fax 949-586-2082

--- On Sun, 3/8/09, [email protected] wrote:From: [email protected]

Exb "4", pg. 91



92/95

Subject: I have an idea

To: "Orly Taitz"

Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 9:02 AM

Hi Orly,

I own a jewelry company and can donate a portion of the profits to you. I have a brandcalled Long Stem Gems (tm) that I have a "Believe" ring. It's gorgeous and I can donate$25 per sale to the foundation. Each colored stone represnts a rose color and itsmeaning. I also have clearance jewelry that I import from Italy--gorgeous as well. If youwant, we can post to the site and I can also offer you a percent

Decl of Ostella in Support of Plffs Opp and Obj to LOOT MTD and Amended MTD Doc 386

Documents

Transcript of Decl of Ostella in Support of Plffs Opp and Obj to LOOT MTD and Amended MTD Doc 386