DECISION ON FUNDING PROPOSALS - JPI...
12
1 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu DECISION ON FUNDING PROPOSALS The proposals with all countries available budget will be funded (first two proposals) For proposals in which one partner cannot be fund because the Partner’s country has finished its call budget or the budget in not sufficient, the following procedure was agreed and adopted: 1. The country increased its national contribution: UK increased with 180 KEuro (UK total budget available from 120 to 300 KEuro) 2. The Country/ies budget available to fund the Coordinator/Participants is not sufficient to fund the whole requested budget: after discussion and contact with the Participants a reduction of the funded budget was performed. JPICH GB - 10 th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
Transcript of DECISION ON FUNDING PROPOSALS - JPI...
1 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
DECISION ON FUNDING PROPOSALS
The proposals with all countries available budget will be funded (first
two proposals)
For proposals in which one partner cannot be fund because the
Partner’s country has finished its call budget or the budget in not sufficient,
the following procedure was agreed and adopted:
1. The country increased its national contribution: UK increased with 180
KEuro (UK total budget available from 120 to 300 KEuro)
2. The Country/ies budget available to fund the Coordinator/Participants
is not sufficient to fund the whole requested budget: after discussion
and contact with the Participants a reduction of the funded budget was
performed.
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
2 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
DECISION ON FUNDING PROPOSALS
The proposal is funded without the Partner(s) of the Country with
no budget available according that :
The remaining Partners are at least from 3 countries as
request in the call
The Partner(s) of the Country with no budget available is not
the proposal Leader
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
3
OUT PUT OF SIGNATORIES MEETING
Matrix at the end of Signatories meeting
Topics Score
Ranking ACRONYM BELSPO FWO CY DK FR IE IT LT NL NO PL SI ES UK % Funded
2 44 1 EMERISDA 158,2 299,5 50,0 100,0%
4 42 2 H@V 50,0 44,8 27,2 43,7 100,0%
1,2 41 3 REDMONEST 241,8 50,0 14,3 75,0 99,4%
4 41 4 KEDALION - - - #DIV/0!
3,4 40 5 CHERISCAPE 188,8 45,3 50,0 102,8 49,9 76,5%
1,2 40 6 SafeBioTech - - - #DIV/0!
4 40 7 JTEL - - - #DIV/0!
3 39 8 RurHerDSS - - - #DIV/0!
1 39 9 KISADAMA - 150,0 169,1 50,0 100,0%
3 38 10 SUSFUHUC 50,0 50,0 50,0 100,0%
1 38 11 MTA-MP - - - - #DIV/0!
1,2 38 12 LeadART 25,0 50,0 62,5 50,0 100,0%
3,4 38 13 MECH - - - - - #DIV/0!
1 38 14 CLIMA - - - #DIV/0!
1,2,4 37 15 STUCCO - - - - #DIV/0!
3 37 16 MONASTERY - - - #DIV/0!
4 37 17 LANDSCAPE - - - #DIV/0!
1 37 18 TANGIBLE 100,0 42,6 97,9 74,0 76,5%
1 37 19 MUSEUMS - - - - #DIV/0!
2 36 20 EMIRA - - - #DIV/0!
1,2,4 36 21 Guadalteba - - - - - - #DIV/0!
1,4 36 22 V-Monitor - - - #DIV/0!
1 36 23 ArCo 100,0 50,0 80,3 50,0 100,0%
1 36 24 MicroCOSMO - - - #DIV/0!
400,015 338,8 125,0 100 192,6 50
723,56125 0,0
295,267
144,836 0,0 0 278,9
143,558
www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
4
OUT PUT OF SIGNATORIES MEETING
www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
1. List of proposals to be funded
2. Reserved list of proposals for negotiation
3. Road map for funded proposals
4. Road map for negotiations
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
5
PROPOSALS FUNDED
PROJECT NAME TOPIC LEADER PARTNER
% FINANCING TYPOLOGY N’ COUNTRIES INVOLVED/Partners
EMERISDA 2 Belgium 100 Collaborative
Research 3 (9p)
H@V 4 UK 100 Networking 4 (5p)
REDMONEST 1;2 Spain 99,5 Collaborative
Research 4 (5p)
KISADAMA 1 Italy 100 Collaborative
Research 4 (4p)
SUSFUHUC 3 Netherland 100 Networking 3 (3p)
LEADART 1,2 France 100 Collaborative
Research 5 (10p)
ARCO 1 Norway 100 Collaborative
Research 4 (5p)
CHERISCAPE 3;4 UK 76,5 Networking 5 (7p)
TANGIBLE 1 Cyprus 76,5 Collaborative
Research 4 (4p)
SMARTVALUE 4 Poland 100 Collaborative
Research 6 (10p)
6 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
Total proposal submitted 89
Total proposal passed after the eligibility check 66
Total funded proposal 10
of which
Funded at 100% 7
Funded at 99 % 1
Funded at 76,5% 2
ANALYSES OF THE JPI-JHEP PILOT CALL
Total value of projects funded 3.492.000 Euro (Italy increased its call budget to complete financing of Project Smart/Value)
Total value of projects submitted 24.373.000 Euro ca (Approximately 7 times the available budget)
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
7 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
ANALYSES OF THE JPI-JHEP PILOT CALL
0
10
20
30
40
50
6057
23 18
31
15 9
18 13
7
56
25
17 14
30
Number Proposals involved Country (base 89)
Number Proposals involved Country (base 89)
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
8 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
ANALYSES OF THE JPI-JHEP PILOT CALL
19%
4%
11%
0% 0%
33%
28%
0% 0%
5%
0%
6% 7%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Proposals not eligibile per Countries (%)
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
9 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
26
18
11
30
18
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Proposals submitted for topic 1
Proposals submitted for topic 2
Proposals submitted for topic 3
Proposals submitted for topic 4
Proposals submitted multi-topics
Proposals number
Proposal submitted/Topics
ANALYSES OF THE JPI-JHEP PILOT CALL
10
ANALYSES OF THE JPI-JHEP PILOT CALL
% Proposals for Countries involved 13,5%
86,5%
Proposals involved 3Countries
Proposals involvedmore than 3 Countries
www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
11
Procedure analysis for call launch
www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu
Launch of the call is based on these fundamental documents:
• Call Announcement
• Guidelines for Applicants
• Project Template
For each document we circulated a matrix and
Partners were asked for suggestions to improve
the documents for the next JPICH call: HERITAGE PLUS
JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
12 www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JPICH GB - 10th Meeting Rome, 25 October 2013
