DECISION NOTICE - chrc.qld.gov.au

OUR REFERENCE: 403.2016.13 CONTACT NAME: Sarah Ronnfeldt TELEPHONE: 1300 242 686 FAX: 1300 242 687 EMAIL: [email protected]

3 January 2017 A and L Stent-Smith C/- Murray and Associates (Qld) Pty Ltd PO Box 246 NAMBOUR QLD 4560 Email: [email protected] Attention: Emily Holmes Dear Madam

DECISION NOTICE Sustainable Planning Act 2009

I refer to your application and advise that on 20 December 2016 Council, under delegated authority, decided to approve the application in full subject to conditions. Details of the decision are as follows:

1. APPLICATION DETAILS

Application Number: 403.2016.13

Street Address: Bonnie Doon Road and Capricorn Highway (Central Line Railway) Yamala

Real Property Description: Lot 1 on SP224248 and Part of Lot 51 on SP122074

Planning Scheme: Central Highlands Regional Council Planning Scheme 2016

2. DECISION DETAILS

The following type of approval has been issued: Development Permit for Material Change of Use: Utility Installation (Rail Siding)

3. RELEVANT PERIOD

The relevant period of this approval will expire on 20 December 2020.

4. INFRASTRUCTURE

Where conditions relate to the provision of infrastructure, these are non-trunk infrastructure conditions unless specifically nominated as a “necessary infrastructure condition” for provision of trunk infrastructure as defined under Chapter 8 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.

5. ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS

1. PARAMETERS OF APPROVAL

The development of the premises must comply with the provisions of the Council’s Planning Scheme and Local Laws to the extent that they are no varied by this approval.

Timing: At all times. 2. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT The development approved by this development permit is a utility installation (rail siding).

Advice note: This development permit does not allow interactions between approved utility installation (rail siding) and approved Lot 3 (Council reference 4050/14). It is expected that this will be considered through future land use applications over Lot 3.

3. APPROVED PLANS

The development must be carried out generally in accordance with the stamped approved plans and documentation as detailed in the following schedule and any amendments arising through conditions to this approval:

Drawing title Drawing Number Rev. Date Prepared by

Yamala Grain Storage Facility Rail Siding formation Longitudinal Section – Sht 1 of 3

C0101G-200-01 A 22.09.15 Stafford Adamson





4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL TO BE SUBMITTED WITH SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT

APPLICATIONS A copy of this development approval, including all approved plans and documents, must be

submitted with any subsequent development application required as part of this development. Timing: At the time of making a subsequent development. 5. DECISION NOTICE AND APPROVED PLANS TO BE RETAINED ON-SITE A copy of this development approval, including approved plans and documents, must be retained on

site at all times. The conditions of this development approval must be read in conjunction with the approved plans to ensure consistency in construction, establishment and maintenance of approved works.

Timing: At all times. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE (a) The utility installation must achieve the environmental values for the acoustic environment and

acoustic quality objectives for sensitive receiving environments set out in the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy at all times.

(b) The utility installation must achieve the environmental values and air quality objectives set out in

the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy at all times. (c) The utility installation must not produce any odour emissions in excess of one (1) odour unit

beyond the site boundaries.

(d) The utility installation must ensure that any vertical illumination resulting from direct, reflected or other incidental lighting emanating from the site does not exceed eight (8) lux when measured at any point 1.5 metres outside the boundary and at any level from ground level upwards.

Lights associated with the approved development must be designed, sited, installed and tested to

comply with Table 2.1 and 2.2 of Australian Standard AS4282-1997 Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting using a control level of 2.

Timing: At all times. 7. WEED MANAGEMENT All declared weeds located on the development site must be removed and destroyed. Timing: To be maintained at all times. 8. PERMITTED HOURS OF OPERATION The use is permitted to operate 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. Timing: At all times once the use has commenced. 9. RESTRICTED ACCESS

No driveway crossover is to be constructed between approved Lot 2, on Council reference 4050/14, and the approved ‘New Road’, on Council reference 4050/14. A barrier treatment is to be constructed between the approved use and the ‘New Road’. Access to the utility installation is to be achieved from Lot 1 and or Lot 3 only. Timing: At all times once the use has commenced.

10. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

Access to the site during the construction of the utility installation is to be via Bonnie Doon Road and in the location of the approved access easement/‘New Road’ on approval Council reference 4050/14. No access is permitted to the site from the unnamed road reserve which runs parallel to the Capricorn Highway and rail corridor to the north of the subject site. Timing: At all times during construction.

11. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN

The works approved in this development permit will be required to be carried out in accordance with a Construction Management Plan endorsed by Council through an Operational Works application. To ensure expedient assessment of any Operational Works application, the applicant is encouraged to submit a preliminary Construction Management Plan that addresses the requirements of the Planning Scheme. In particular, the preliminary Construction Management Plan should address the following: (a) A traffic management control plan:

i. Detailing all temporary signage and traffic control measures prior to and during construction;

ii. Detailing the nature and location of temporary access to be gained from Bonnie Doon Road and how this will be managed;

iii. Confirming that no access will be achieved to the site from the unnamed road reserve running parallel to the existing rail corridor along the Capricorn Highway;

iv. Area nominated for parking of vehicles associated with the construction workers, ensuring that these vehicles are not parked in road reserves; and

v. Proposed perimeter site treatment (i.e. fencing) during the construction phase of each stage of the development.

(b) Maintenance and protection of water quality and existing drainage lines through the construction site, through the implementation of appropriate erosion and sediment control measures;

(c) Works program identifying key components of the works and their respective durations at each stage;

(d) Establishment of a communication protocol with the general public, adjoining owners, emergency services to advise of agreed construction times, impacts on traffic and services and other relevant issues;

(e) Identification of complaint management procedures including: i. Contact details for the on-site manager; and ii. Dispute resolution procedures.

Timing: At Operational Works stage and to be maintained throughout the construction phase of the development for all Stages.

12. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – CIVIL WORKS CONSTRUCTION – SUPERVISION OF WORKS The construction of all works associated with the proposal shall be supervised by a registered

engineer whose appointment shall require approval of the Chief Executive Officer or delegate. On completion of the works the applicant/owner must give the Council a certificate from the registered engineer stating that the work of constructing the operational works has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specification approved by Council.

Timing: During construction of operational works and prior to the commencement of the use. 13. DAMAGE TO COUNCIL SERVICES AND ASSETS

Any damage caused to existing services and assets above or below the ground must be repaired: (a) Where the damage would cause a hazard to a pedestrian or vehicle safety, immediately; or (b) Where otherwise, upon completion of the works associated with the development.

Any repair work which proposes to alter the alignment or level of existing services and assets must first be referred to the relevant service authority for approval. Timing: At all times.

14. WORKS – APPLICANT’S EXPENSE

All works, services, facilities and/or public utility alterations required by this approval or stated condition/s, whether carried out by Council or otherwise, are to be at the developer’s expense unless otherwise specified.

Timing: At all times. 15. RAIL CROSSING OF UNNAMED ROAD RESERVE

An operational works application must propose an appropriate treatment of the rail line crossing the unnamed road reserve to the north of the subject site. The proposed treatment must comply with the relevant Australian Standards and Department of Transport and Main Roads guidelines. The treatment approved through the operational works must be installed Timing: At operational Works application stage and prior to commencement of use.

6. REFERRAL AGENCIES

Referral Agency and Address Referral Status Response

Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning PO Box 113 ROCKHAMPTION QLD 4700

Concurrence agency The Department provided their concurrence agency response on 5 December 2016. A copy of their response is attached, reference SDA-0816-032953.

7. APPROVED PLANS

The following plans are Approved Plans for the development:

Approved Plans

Drawing title Drawing Number Rev. Date Prepared by







8. ADVISORY NOTES

The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form part of the assessment manager conditions: A. FURTHER PERMITS REQUIRED

Further permits are required for operational works (stormwater, excavating and filling, rail crossing of Council road reserve [unnamed road reserve], erosion and sediment control). You are advised to contact the relevant departments within Council for information regarding these permits.

B. 4050/14 – AMENDED RECONFIGURATION PLAN

It is noted that an amended lot reconfiguration plan for the approval, Council reference, 4050/14 is included in the application. These plans propose to vary the boundaries of Lot 1, 2 and 3 to accommodate the subject utility installation. This approval does not extend to these proposed plans. A request to change an existing approval, pursuant to section 369 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 will be required to be lodged to Council to facilitate this change. Please be advised that Council, in principle, supports the proposed realigned boundaries.

9. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED

Development Permit for Operational Works

10. RIGHTS OF APPEAL

You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached. During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”. (Refer to Part 8 – Dealing with decision notices and approvals – Division 1 – Changing decision notices and approvals during the applicant’s appeal period of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.)

11. OTHER DETAILS

Should you require further information, please contact Council’s Development Assessment Unit on 1300 242 686. Yours faithfully

Sarah Ronnfeldt Principal Planner Development Assessment Enc: Approved Plans Appeal Rights Concurrence agency response – with conditions

Appeal Rights

The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Chapter 7)

MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS

Division 8 Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals 461 Appeals by applicants

(1) An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following— (a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application;

(b) any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242;

(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for; (d) the length of a period mentioned in section 341; (e) a deemed refusal of the development application.

(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after—

(a) if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or

(b) otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant. (3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made. 462 Appeals by submitters—general

(1) A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against— (a) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring

impact assessment under section 314; or (b) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.

(2) To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following— (a) the giving of a development approval; (b) any provision of the approval including— (i) a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or (ii) the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval. (3) However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter— (a) withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or (b) has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii). (4) The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter. 463 Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications

(1) This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies. (2) A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a concurrence agency for the application. (3) However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to— (a) development for an aquacultural ERA; or (b) development that is— (i) a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or (ii) operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant. (4) Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment— (a) a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive; (b) a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2). 464 Appeals by advice agency submitters

(1) Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission. (2) The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about— (a) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327. (3) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter. (4) However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision. 465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals

(1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.

(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes

(1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval— (a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application— (i) the person who made the request; or (ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request; (b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 467 Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency

(1) A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.

sronnfeldt

Draft

sronnfeldt

Text Box

403.2016.13 20 December 2016

Fitzroy/Central Regional Office Level 2, 209 Bolsover Street PO Box 113 Rockhampton QLD 4700

Our reference: SDA-0816-032953 Your reference: 403.2016.13 5 December 2016 The Chief Executive Officer Central Highlands Regional Council [email protected] Attention: Jaymie Webster Dear Sir/Madam, Concurrence agency response—with conditions Bonnie Doon Road and Capricorn Highway (Central Line Railway), Yamala (Lot 1 SP224248 and Part of Lot 51 SP122074) (Given under section 285 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009) The referral agency material for the development application described below was received by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning under section 272 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 on 7 September 2016. Applicant details

Applicant name: Alan & Laurel Stent-Smith

c/- Murray & Associates (QLD) Pty Ltd

Applicant contact details: PO Box 246 Nambour QLD 4560 [email protected]

Site details

Street address: Bonnie Doon Road and Capricorn Highway (Central Line Railway), Yamala

Lot on plan: Lot 1 SP224248 and Part of Lot 51 SP122074

Local government area: Central Highlands Regional

mailto:[email protected]

SDA-0816-032953

Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page 2

Application details Proposed development: Development Permit for Material Change of Use (utility

installation - rail siding) Aspects of development and type of approval being sought

Nature of Development

Approval Type

Brief Proposal of Description

Level of Assessment

Material Change of Use

Development permit

Utility installation – construction of a rail siding

Code Assessment

Referral triggers

The development application was referred to the department under the following provisions of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009:

Referral trigger Schedule 7, Table 3, Item 1—State-controlled road

Schedule 7, Table 3, Item 15A—Railways Conditions Under section 287(1)(a) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the conditions set out in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval. Reasons for decision to impose conditions Under section 289(1) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the department must set out the reasons for the decision to impose conditions. These reasons are set out in Attachment 2. Further advice Under section 287(6) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the department offers advice about the application to the assessment manager—see Attachment 3. Approved plans and specifications The department requires that the following plans and specifications set out below and in Attachment 4 must be attached to any development approval.

Drawing/Report Title Prepared by

Date Reference no. Version/Issue

Aspect of development: Material Change of Use - Utility Installation (Rail Siding) Yamala Grain Storage Facility Rail Siding Formation Longitudinal Section-Sht. 1 of 3

Stafford Adamson

22/09/15 CO101G-200-01 A

Yamala Grain Storage Facility Rail Siding Formation Longitudinal Section-Sht. 2 of 3

Stafford Adamson

22/09/15 CO101G-200-02 A

Yamala Grain Storage Facility Rail Siding Formation Longitudinal Section-Sht. 3 of 3

Stafford Adamson

22/09/15 CO101G-200-03 A

A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.

SDA-0816-032953


For further information, please contact Carl Porter, A/Principal Planning Officer, on 07 4924 2918 or via email at [email protected] who will be pleased to assist. Yours sincerely

Anthony Walsh A/Manager Planning Fitzroy and Central cc: Alan & Laurel Stent-Smith c/- Murray & Associates (Qld) Pty Ltd, [email protected] enc: Attachment 1—Conditions to be imposed

Attachment 2—Reasons for decision to impose conditions Attachment 3—Further advice Attachment 4—Approved Plans and Specifications


SDA-0816-032953


Our reference: SDA-0816-032953 Your reference: 403.2016.13 Attachment 1—Conditions to be imposed No. Conditions Condition timing

Material Change of Use - Utility Installation (Rail Siding)

Schedule 7, Table 3, Item 15A—Railways—Pursuant to section 255D of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the chief executive administering the Act nominates the Director-General of the Department of Transport and Main Roads to be the assessing authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following condition(s):

1. The development must be carried out generally in accordance with the following plans:

• Yamala Grain Storage Facility Rail Siding Formation Longitudinal Section-Sht. 1 of 3, prepared by Stafford Adamson, dated 22/09/15, drawing number CO101G-200-01 and revision A.



Prior to the commencement of use and to be maintained at all times

2. (a) Stormwater management of the development must ensure no worsening or actionable nuisance to the railway.

(b) Any works on the land must not:

(i) create any new discharge points for stormwater runoff

onto the railway; (ii) interfere with and/or cause damage to the existing

stormwater drainage on the railway; (iii) surcharge any existing culvert or drain on the railway; (iv) reduce the quality of stormwater discharge onto the

railway.

(a) At all times. (b) At all times.

3. (a) A Construction Management Plan must be prepared by RPEQ (traffic engineer) and given to the Program Delivery and Operations Unit, Department of Transport and Main Roads, Central Queensland Region ([email protected]).

(b) The Construction Management Plan must demonstrate that there will be no disruption to railway level crossing safety on the Central Line railway during the course of construction.

(c) The construction of the development must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan.

Prior to obtaining development approval for building work or operational work, whichever occurs first.


SDA-0816-032953


Our reference: SDA-0816-032953 Your reference: 403.2016.13 Attachment 2—Reasons for decision to impose conditions The reasons for this decision are: • To ensure the development is carried out generally in accordance with the plans of

development submitted with the application. • To ensure that the impacts of stormwater events associated with development are

minimised and managed to avoid creating any adverse impacts on the state-transport corridor.

• To ensure the development does not compromise the safe and efficient operation of state transport infrastructure during construction.

SDA-0816-032953


Our reference: SDA-0816-032953 Your reference: 403.2016.13 Attachment 3—Further advice General advice

1. Railway Level Crossing Safety Railway level crossings could be adversely impacted by development-generated traffic. In particular, there is a railway level crossing of the Central Line on Bonnie Doon Road (ID: LX1087) which provides access to the Capricorn Highway. The proposed development of the rail siding appears to be dependent on the approved development (Council reference 4050/14) being constructed. Hence, the impacts of both the approved and proposed development need to be considered in relation to railway level crossings. As per the Memorandum of Understanding between the Local Government Association of Queensland and Queensland Rail and the Department of Transport and Main Roads with respect to the Management and Funding Responsibility for Level Crossing Safety, the local government is responsible for any safety upgrades to a level crossing if the change in risk to the level crossing is due to changes in nearby land uses which have been authorised by local government. Central Highlands Regional Council should continue to monitor the level of safety risk and number of reported level crossing issues at this railway level crossing as further development in the area is approved. It should also give consideration to implementing improved control and safety measures, as required, to ensure a worsening to railway level crossing safety at the Bonnie Doon Road railway level crossing. The implementation of traffic management measures should also be considered during construction of the Utility Installation (Rail Siding).

2. Construction Management Plan The applicant is recommended to consult with the railway manager (Aurizon) prior to the preparation of the Construction Management Plan in relation to the traffic management measures that should be implemented to ensure the development does not increase the safety risk at the Bonnie Doon railway level crossing of the Central Line. The applicant should contact Nicole Rabbito of Aurizon on (07) 3019 7969 or at [email protected] to discuss the proposed vehicle movements (machinery/equipment, fill, ballast and other construction material and staff traffic) as well as scheduled train movements and the traffic management measures that may be required at the railway level crossing during construction.

3. Stormwater and Drainage The proposed development of the rail siding appears to be dependent on the approved development (Council reference 4050/14) being constructed. Hence, the impacts of both the approved and proposed development need to be considered in relation to stormwater and drainage. Therefore, when demonstrating compliance with the condition relating to stormwater management, the applicant should submit a revised version of the Stormwater Management Report entitled, Yamala Grain Facility – GrainCorp, prepared by Stafford Adamson & Associates Pty Ltd, dated 13 November 2014, job number CO101G, and revision number 1 to assess the potential stormwater impacts on the railway as a result of the proposed development and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The aforementioned Stormwater Management Report is conditioned in the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning’s concurrence agency response for the development approval over the site (Council reference 4050/14 and State reference SDA-0115-017778). The revised Stormwater Management Report should:

(a) Address both the approved development (Council reference 4050/14) and the proposed development (the subject of the current development application). It should

SDA-0816-032953


also give consideration to the overall stormwater management strategy required for the future expansion of the site and how the approved and proposed development will integrate with this strategy;

(b) Be prepared in accordance with Module 18.2 of the SDAP and the Guide to development in a transport environment: Rail, (available at http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Technical-standards-publications/Guide-to-development-in-a-transport-environment-rail.aspx) and with consideration given to the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (available at https://www.dews.qld.gov.au/water-supply-regulations/urban-drainage).

(c) Demonstrate that the management of stormwater (quantity and quality) post development can achieve a no worsening impact (on the pre-development condition) for all flood and stormwater events that exist prior to development and up to a 1% Annual Exeedance Probability (AEP) (equivalent to 1/100 year Average Recurrence Interval (ARI)). Stormwater management for the proposed development must ensure no worsening or actionable nuisance to the railway, including rail transport infrastructure, caused by peak discharges, flood levels, frequency/duration of flooding, flow velocities, water quality, sedimentation and scour effects.

(d) Ensure the following are addressed, where applicable: (i) All relevant legal points of discharge for the development site are identified. Any

alterations to existing discharge to or from the railway will rely on gaining relevant approvals from the railway manager under section 255 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994. Hence if discharge to the railway is proposed to be modified, the railway manager (Aurizon) should be consulted during the preparation of the revised Stormwater Management Report;

(ii) Overland flow paths are identified and hydraulic conveyance is maintained on the site as part of the proposed development;

(iii) Flood storage capacity is maintained on the site as part of the proposed development;

(iv) The adverse impacts from sheet flow on the railway are prevented; (v) The proposed development does not cause a concentration of stormwater

(including floodwater) flows discharging on the railway during construction or thereafter;

(vi) Retaining structures, filling/excavation, landscaping, construction activities or any other works to the land have been designed to include provision for drainage so as not to adversely impact on the railway;

(vii) The proposed development does not impede or interfere with any drainage, stormwater or floodwater flows from the railway;

(viii) Stormwater or floodwater flows have been designed to maintain the structural integrity of the rail transport infrastructure;

(ix) Existing stormwater drainage infrastructure on the railway is not interfered with or damaged by the proposed development such as through concentrated flows, surcharging, scour or deposition;

(x) The quality of stormwater discharging onto the railway is not reduced through erosion and sedimentation.

Further development permits, compliance permits or compliance certificates

4. Works on a Railway The current development proposal seeks to establish a rail siding, including a rail siding passing lane, which will rely on connection to the Central Line. Pursuant to section 255 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, the railway manager’s written approval is required to carry out works in or on a railway or otherwise interfere with the railway or its operations. In particular, any works associated with establishing the Utility Installation (Rail Siding) will require relevant approvals to be obtained from the railway manager, for example, wayleave agreements, and licences to enter and construct, amongst other relevant approvals. The proposed Utility Installation (Rail Siding) will also be dependent on obtaining connection,

http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Technical-standards-publications/Guide-to-development-in-a-transport-environment-rail.aspx

http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Technical-standards-publications/Guide-to-development-in-a-transport-environment-rail.aspx

https://www.dews.qld.gov.au/water-supply-regulations/urban-drainage

SDA-0816-032953


access and siding agreements with the railway manager for the Central Line. The proposed works will need to ensure the safety and operational integrity of the Central Line railway during all stages of the development including during construction and on-going operation. The applicant should contact Nicole Rabbito of Aurizon on (07) 3019 7969 or at [email protected] in relation to this matter.

5. Overdimensional Road Loads (Aurizon) Under the Transport Infrastructure (Rail) Regulation 2006 permission from the Railway Manager (Aurizon) is required to take overdimensional road loads across Aurizon Infrastructure (e.g. rail level crossings). Further information can be obtained from Aurizon’s website at: http://www.aurizon.com.au/network/overdimensional-loads.

SDA-0816-032953


Our reference: SDA-0816-032953 Your reference: 403.2016.13 Attachment 4—Approved plans and specifications This page deliberately left blank

"'0

� �

\ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \\\

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \ \

\\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\

("") \ \ \ �, \ \ i \ \ \ i, \ \

\\\ \ \ \ %\ \ \ � \ \ \ �\ \\

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \

\ \ \ ' .'

�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \ \ \. \

EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

DESIGN SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

---- - ,-

-1.1 7% -tl. N\%

R.L. 171.300 "' "' "'N

;:;CUT FILL 0

0 0 0 . . . "' "' ....

DESIGN 0 ,-. "' "' ,-. "' SURFACE � � � .... 0 "' EXISTING "' "' "'

� � � SURFACE 0 ... 0 0 m 0

CHAINAGE d 5 0 0

SCALE

"' 0 � ";' 0 '

.... ...."' "'"' .,� �"' "'., N

� � 0 0 0 0

� 0 0 "'

kJ.,..!Js

NM ., .... "'"' oo' ' �� "'"' ...i...i ��"'"' 00,

...irri �� " 0 "'0 mo

;!: g

0 "'�"'

'=/ '=/ ,-.

� "' N

� � ,-. 0

,-. "'"' "'"' "'0 0 0 0

� 0 0 �

" "'

0

� �

BO. 00 11439 l42 R

"',-. ,-. '=/ ,-. "' �"' "' g 0 0 0

�

...N

:;: ...J 0::

m " ,..: "' .c (.)

U)

"'"' �0 '

� � N ., g 0 0 0 0 �

_ _........------\ _........ ' _........- .......... - \

\

1B4.0---�

1 x 600x375 RCBC UNDER RAIL WITH PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALLS RIP-RAP BOTH ENDS

"' ,-. "' "' � :!: 0 .... ,-. "1 0 0 '=/ 0 ' ' ' ,-. "' "' "' ;,!:

"' N "' N N

� � � � ., 0 N "' ., ., "' "' "'

g g "' "' "'

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g 0

� � 0 N

N "' N

T

\ \ \ \ \

\ \ '

-

"' ,-. 0

"' � � ., '=/

0 '=/ ' "' "' "' 0 ;;?; "' "' "' � � � ;;';

"' "' "' 0

g "' � "'

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

� 0 g "' "' N

1=1000 (Al)

PLAN VIEW

SCALE, MOOO (A1)

"' �

� "'

=�

�� :1 � 5

PROPOSED RAIL FORMATION gt

� � 6�

--

0.2(0%

"' ,-. 0 "' "' "' "' 0 N "' N ., ., "' "' � :; :; � � ,-. � 0 � ;.; "' "' "' "' "' --: ., --: --: '=/

"1

'=/ '=/ '=/ '=/ '=/ 0 '=/ 0 '=/ 0

'=/ 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' '

"' 0 "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' N "' "' 0

-;J. "' N "' 0 ;'! "' N "' 0

'ii, --: ., --: "' "' "' "' ,-. ,-. "' "' "' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � "' "' "'

;,!: "'

N ;:!; .... "' "' "' "' 0 "' "'

0 0 0 N "' "' "' ., "' "' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N

i 0 0

ij 0 0 0 0

i 0

� 0

i 0 "' 0 �

0 �

0 ®

0 0 N "' � "' � N :g "' "' ... "' "'

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

RAIL SIDING Ch 0.000 to Ch 660.000 SCALES, HORIZONTAL MOOD VERTICAL 1'200

r-•. S.-+-22.-09.15+-�SU£_TO_CL.DIT------+---<111 �wl��E� � [O�S� �n"�"�� APPD. DATE DETAILS ISS.

DATE: 18.09.15

DRAWN: PG

SCALES: SCALE AS SHOWN

APPROVED: RS

CHECKED: RS

PO BOX 7120

TOOWOOMBA SOUTH

QLD 4352

Phone: (07) 4639 6600 Fox: (07) 4639 6300

Email: [email protected]

"' "' N "' � "1 "'

0 '=/ 0 ' ' * � � � �

"' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' � � � 0 0 0 0 0 0

g 0 0 0 � N "' "' "'

PROJECT. GRAINCORP - YAWJ.A

.,� '=/

� "'"' ;;?; � 0 0 0 0 "'"'

TITLE. YAMALA GRAIN STORAGE FACILllY RAIL SIDING FORMATION

LONGITUDINAL SECTION-SHT. OF 3 DRAWING No.

C0101 G-200-01

I

------,'iJ<!l EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

,./" ,go!l · DESIGN SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

0.20)%

R.L. 172.200 ... N 00 "' "' ...� :;;: .... 'if, 0

"' CUT FILL 00 0

"i "i 0

"i "t ''

� ... � � � �DESIGN ;! SURFACE "' "' "' � "' "'

00 00 00 00 00

� "' "' 00 "' ....EXISTING N N N

� � � � � �SURFACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CHAINAGE d 0

g0

� 0

g 0 0 "' N "' <O <O " ,... ,... ,...

SCALE

kJ.,..!Js

"' ..."'0 ' ...� � 0 ... � 0 0 0

g ,...

00 N "' 0

0 "t ' "'

00 "' "' "' "' �00

"' "' "' "' � � 0 0 0 0 O'.) 0 "'

�0, ,...

..J "'"'N "'"" ;;; .c (.)

"' � (.)

� � �

40.bOO 10889 64� R

"' .... ... .... "' 00

0 0

' '

"' "' 00 "' "'

� "' 00

"' "'... � � 0 0 0 0 O'.) 0 "' 0 ;;; N

a)

....�"i

"' ...."' "' 00

.... "' � 0 0 O'.) "' :2

"' 0 00 "' "' 0

00 "' g;

"' � .... "' N U') "' "i "i <i 0 -; -: +

"' 0 "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' N "' "' "' N N N

� "' "' � "' "' 00 00 00 00

00 0 "' "' 00 .... .... "' 00 N .... � "' "' � � � 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g0 0

� 0

� 0 �

:g N

a) 0, 0, 0,

T 1=1000 (A1)

M,

PROPOSED AIL FORMATION WORKS INCLU G EXTENDE EARTHWORKS FOR AIL SIDING PASS G LINE

... 00

N +

N "' � "'"'....00

0 0 0 0 <O 0,

PLAN VIEW

SCALE, MOOD (A1)

"' "' � "' � N "' + .

00 "' N "'

0

� "' 00

"' "' "'....; 00

0 0 0 0 0

ig 0,

00 "' N

i "' 0

� 0 "'"'00

0 0 0 0 N

$:!


RAIL SIDING Ch 660.000 to Ch 1320.000

0 .... "' -t 00

N 0 "' 00

0

0

� 0 0 0

��

SCALES, HORIZONTAL 1'1000 VERTICAL 1'200

"'...�i.ri • +

0

0

�� t O'.>O "0 0'.>0 iriO

��

-0.168%

N � "i

"' "' �"'N "' 0 0 0

g $:!

LPROPOSED RAIL FORMATION

"' N "' "' N

g; N

N � .... .... '; ': "1 00 � +

.... "' 0 "' "' N "' "' N "' "' 00 00 00 .... � � � � � "' "' 00 00 "' 0 0 "' "' �

N "' "' "' "' "' "' "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

i� 0 � 0 N �

;; "1 "' +

"' "'....�"'N

� 0 0

g�

�

EXISTING SURFACE

"' N .... �

0 0 0

�

N "' "' �

0 0 0

� N

0 "' g 0 0 0

�

0 N 0 0

i i

0 0 0

�

0 0 0

�

r-•. S.-+-22.-09.15+-

�SU£_TO_CL.DIT-----+---<111 �wl��E� � [O�S� �n"�"�� APPD. DATE DETAILS ISS.



LONGITUDINAL SECTION-SHT. 2 OF 3 DATE: 18.09.15 APPROVED: RS

DRAWN: PG CHECKED: RS


PO BOX 7120 TOOWOOMBA SOUTH

QLD 4352 Phone: (07) 4639 6600 Fox: (07) 4639 6300


DRAWING No. C0101 G-200-02

// ,!1<·0 EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

,qi0.0 DESIGN SURFACE CONTOURS AT 1.0m INTERVALS

PLAN VIEW

SCALE, 1,1000 IA1)

/ EXISTING SURFACE

SCALE 0 25

R.L. 172.100

CUT FILL

DESIGN SURFACE

EXISTING SURFACE

CHAINAGE

0 _, 00

;f,. "'

0 "' 1 -1

m

+

00

i;i "' "' "' _, ..; ..; � � � ;.!; � 00

_, -': 0 "' 00

"' 00 00

0 0 0

0 ...

-0.16 %

"' 0 m m

"' 0 "' 00

m -': 00 m

m N + + + +

� � 0 "' "' "' "' _, -': m m

..; ..; ..; � � � � N N � ;! 00 00

g � "'

� 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 "' 0 N ... !'.? ;!: ;!: ;!:


RAIL SIDING Ch 1320.000 to Ch 1510.000 SCALES, HORIZONTAL 1'1000 VERTICAL 1,200

125 T

"' � "' _, 0

+ 0

+

1=1000 (A1)

PROPOSED SITE ACCESS ROAD

m

� 0

0 + '

"' "' "' m

N N

..; � �

� �m

� �

>---•. s.--1-22.-09.15-l---

�SU£_TO_CL.DIT------+------i111 �wl��E� � [O�S� �n"�"�� APPD. DATE DETAILS ISS. DATE: 18.09.15 APPROVED: RS

DRAWN: PG CHECKED: RS


PO BOX 7120

TOOWOOMBA SOUTH

QLD 4352

Phone: (07) 4639 6600 Fox: (07) 4639 6300




LONGITUDINAL SECTION-SHT. 3 OF 3 DRAWING No.

C0101 G-200-03

DECISION NOTICE - chrc.qld.gov.au

Documents

Transcript of DECISION NOTICE - chrc.qld.gov.au