Decision making process for clinical IT investments in a …€¦ · · 2015-05-15Johanna...
Transcript of Decision making process for clinical IT investments in a …€¦ · · 2015-05-15Johanna...
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Decision making process for clinical IT investments
in a public health care organization – contingency approach to support the investment decision
process
Johanna Lamminen, Lic. Sc.(Tech.), Tampere University of Technology, Industrial Management
Heikki Forsvik, M.Sc. (Eng.), M.D., Ph.D., Tampere University of Technology, Signal Processing
Ville Voipio, D.Sc. (Tech.), Tampere University of Technology, Signal Processing
Lasse Lehtonen, M.D., Ph.D., LL.D., Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Structure of the presentation
1. Motivation of the study
2. Contingency Theory
3. Contingency Theory in health care
4. IT investments in health care
5. Case description
6. Results
7. Next steps
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
THE MOTIVATION OF THE STUDY
Why has this study been carried out?
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
The motivation of the study
Health care organizations are lacking a clear decision-making
framework in IT investment decisions.
� We need a practical tool which ensures the performance of
an investment and takes both financial and non-financial
factors into account.
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
CONTINGENCY THEORY
One possible theory to be applied
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
The contingency theory
• Fundaments of the contingency theory:
• No one best way of organizing or leading a company.
• The optimal way of organizing or leading is contingent upon the
internal and external situation.
• Variables might have a role designing a management accounting system
• internal variables: organization’s strategy, culture, technology, structure and size
• external variables : organization’s operating environment.
• Originally, the contingency theory was formulated to be used as a test of a decision-making model.
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Contingency theory in decision-making
• The contingency approach is not commonly applied into the
study of decision-making
• it is chosen to be evaluated due to its main proposition
that structure and process of an organization must fit its
context in order to be effective
• Contingency theory brings up a discussion about a specific
situation
• including the amount of relevant information and decision
quality and acceptance
• the theory acknowledges the complexity and uncertainties
behind decisions
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
CONTINGENCY THEORY AND
HEALTH CARE
Can it be applied, has it been applied?
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Earlier study
• Pizzini (2006) tested the relations between managers’ beliefs
about cost data and actual financial performance,
• the absolute level of cost-system functionality
• the extent to which cost-system functionality is aligned with a hospital’s strategy, structure, and environment.
� There is a positive correlation between the managers’ evaluation of the relevance and usefulness of cost data and the extent to which cost-systems can
• provide greater cost detail,
• better classify costs according to behavior,
• report cost information more frequently
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
IT INVESTMENTS IN HEALTH CARE
Different aspects of health care IT investments
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Cost-centric approach
• Health care organizations rarely use financial analyses beyond cost analyses
• There are several relatively straight-forward cost factors:
• hardware cost
• software cost
• availability and cost of data networks (e.g. broadband and mobile)
• ongoing maintenance costs
• Cost analyses (CxA) used in the health care sector:
• CMA: Cost-Minimization Analysis
• CBA: Cost-Benefit Analysis
• CEA: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
• CUA: Cost-Utility Analysis
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Dimensions of the CEA1
1Martikainen, 2008
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Non-trivial factors
• There are other financial factors which are difficult to evaluate, such as:
– ongoing development of technology
– present level of standardization
– interconnectivity between IT systems
• There are also non-financial factors associated with the clinical IT systems, such as:
– factors related to the health care outcome (e.g. patient comfort, equality of care)
– organizational factors (e.g. willingness to adopt new technology)
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Investing in information technology
• Factors to be taken into account:
• financial, technical, and functional aspects
• social obligations and impacts
• Evaluated on the basis of the type of objectives or the problems addressed:
• infrastructure requirements
• operational performance objectives
• strategic objectives
• Evaluation methods can be divided into:
• formative-summative
• objectivist-subjectivist
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
CASE DESCRIPTION
How well would contingency-based decision-making have performed
with a real-world case?
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Hypothesis
The investment decision-making process for a clinical IT system in a
public health care organization is positively correlated to the concept of
contingency fit which is comprised of three independent variables:
1. Strategic priorities: external variables including health care
legislation, politics
2. Organizational configuration: internal variables including
organizational culture, the role of public organization, the state of
existing technology at the time of the final investment decision
3. Internal management accounting systems: non-profit
organization, cost-benefit analysis
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
HUSLAB’s digital ECG system
• HUSLAB purchased a digital ECG recording, analysis, and storage system in 2008.
• At the time HUSLAB carried out some 240 000 ECG examinations a year and over 200 ECG recording devices were in use.
• As it was not possible to determine in advance the legal and economic conditions, or exact technical specifications of the system, Public Procurement Act § 29 (competitive dialogue) was applied.
• Vendors who were able to provide interfaces with existing systems were chosen.
• During negotiations, vendors were able to present the Hospital District with systems meeting the requirements set by the project management
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Decision-making for clinical IT investments
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
RESULTS
Which factors would have been taken into account if the decision had
meen made by applying the contingency theory?
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
The relevant variables
A set of relevant variables (variables which should have been taken into account if the contingency-based approach had been applied) was identified:
• Externalities:
– legislative pressure which enabled the organization to renew its present system
– process redesign resulting from the acquisition of the new system
• Organizational culture:
– environmental factors–both political and legislative–drove the need
– organization itself had a major impact on the decision
– organization’s culture had a palpable influence over the degree of innovation for providing health care services
• Technology:
– better integration due to the new open application interface
– important role of standards
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Conclusions
• The Contingency Theory found a relevant set of variables to
consider in the decision-making process.
• The set of variables mostly coincides with the actual
parameters considered in the decision-making process.
• The actual acquisition process emphasized cost factors more
than the Contingency Theory approach would have done.
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Model for economic evaluations
• We suggest a modified formula for the net present value to be
used in economic evaluations:
where the “standard” NPV variables are:
I – the actual cost of the required investment,
N – number of years to take into account,
Rt – net cash flow on year t (excluding initial investment), and
i – discount rate
the modification to account for contingency variables:
α – possibility for the system to be integrated into the present and future
environments (α ≥ 0),
β – factor describing the level of IT technology (β ≥ 0),
δ – the strategic fit of the required investment (0 < δ ≤ 1)
“Good contingent fit
for the organization
makes the investment
smaller”
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
NEXT STEPS
Looks good, but deserves a closer look
Johanna Lamminen, May 11, 2015, SoTeTiTe
Next steps
• Contingency theory should be further tested on cases in
which the independent variables are not aligned
symmetrically, to
• gain more insight into how the variables interact with one
another under less than optimal conditions
• have the opportunity to scrutinize the role of individual
agency more closely.