Decision Making Manual: A Toolkit for Making Moral Decisions William J. Frey (UPRM) José A....
-
Upload
johanne-gardener -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Decision Making Manual: A Toolkit for Making Moral Decisions William J. Frey (UPRM) José A....
Decision Making Manual: A Toolkit for Making Moral Decisions
William J. Frey (UPRM)José A. Cruz-Cruz (UPRM)
Chuck Huff (St. Olaf)
Syllabus as Social Contract
• Consent (free and informed)
• Quid Pro Quo (mutually beneficial exchange)
• Safe Exit
• FIC (free and informed consent)—The right of a risk bearer to participate in the public decision as to the acceptability of that risk. Includes knowledge requirements and absence of compulsion.
Information
• Name
• Area of academic concentration
• Reason for taking course
• Best educational experience
• Reading and listening in English
There is an analogy between design problems and ethical problems
Design Problem Ethical Problem
Construct a prototype that optimizes (or satisfices) designated specifications
Construct a solution that realizes ethical values (justice, responsibility, reasonableness, respect, and safety)
Conflicts between specifications are resolved through integration of specifications
Resolve conflicts between values (moral vs. moral or moral vs. non-moral) by integration
Prototype must be implemented over background constraints
Implement solution over resource, technical, and interest constraints
Decision-Making in Business
• Rational Choice Method: Textbook (Lawrence and Weber)
• Issue Management Process (32)– Identify Issue– Analyze Issue– Generate Options– Take Action– Evaluate Results
• Evaluating and ranking given results
Problem-solving in computing can be modeled on software design
• The software development cycle can be presented in terms of four stages:
1. Problem Specification
2. Solution Generation
3. Solution Testing
4. Solution Implementation
• Generate or create options that embody or realize ethical value or worth
– We don’t find them, we make them
The Difference between choice and problem-solving?
• In choice, one chooses among existing options by applying different frameworks such as ethical frameworks (Text 86)– Virtues: An action is ethical when it aligns with good
character– Utilitarian: An action is ethical when net benefits
exceed net costs– Rights: An action is ethical when basic human rights
are respected– Justice: An action is ethical when benefits and costs
are fairly distributed
Problem Solving
• We do not find a solution but create one
• We do not evaluate existing choices in terms of standards
• Instead we use the standards to guide the imagination in brainstorming and designing solutions that respond concretely to the situation in question
Problem Solving
Specifying the Problem
Prepare a Socio-Technical System (STS) table
• “an intellectual tool to help us recognize patterns in the way technology is used and produced”– Components: Hardware, Software, Physical Surroundings,
Stakeholders (people, groups, & roles), Procedures, Laws (Criminal Law, Civil Law, Statutes & Regulations), Information Systems (collecting, storing, transferring)
– Other Components: Financial Markets, Rate Structure (Power Systems), Environment, Technological Context, Supply Chain
• A STS is a system. The components are related and interact.
• STSs embody values– Moral: Justice, Respect, Responsibility, Trust, Integrity– Non-Moral: Financial, Efficiency, Sustainability
• STSs exhibit trajectories i.e., coordinated paths of change
1. Identify key components of the STSPart/Level of Analysis
Hardware Software Physical Surround-ings
Stakeholders (People, Groups, and Roles)
Procedures Laws Information Collection and Storage Structures
Individual
Group
Organization
Institution
Identify parts that embody valuesHardware Software Physical
Surround-ings
Stakeholders (People, Groups, and Roles)
Procedures Laws Information Collection and Storage Structures
Justice
Responsibility
Respect
Trust
Integrity
Financial
Environment Integrity
Classify the problem:• Disagreement on Facts
– Did the supervisor sexually harass the employee? (What happened—there are two different versions)
• Disagreement on Concepts– Has the supervisor created a hostile environment? (Meaning of hostile environment?)
• Conflicts– Conflict between moral values (Toysmart either honors property claims of creditors or privacy
rights of customers)– Conflicts between moral and non-moral values (In order to get the chips to clients on time,
LaRue has told the quality control team to skip environmental tests and falsify results)
• A key value becomes vulnerable– Online activity has magnified the potential harms of cyberslander against companies like
Biomatrix
• Immediate, Midterm, or Remote Harms– Is it the case that Therac-25 patients are receiving radiation overdoses?
Table summarizing problem classification (With Generic Solutions)
Problem / Solution Strategy
Disagreement Value Conflict Situational Constraints
Factual Conceptual Integrate? Tradeoff? Resource?Technical?Interest?
Problem Solving
Solution Generation
Solution Generation• Don’t fall into the dilemma trap
– Assumption that all ethical problems in business offer only two solution forms: do the right thing financially or do the right thing ethically
• Brainstorm– Do exercises to unlock creative thought– Start with an individual list– Share your list with others while suspending criticism– Once you have a preliminary list (set a quota) refine it
• Eliminate solutions that are impractical• Combine solutions (one is part of another; one is plan A, the other plan
B)• Test solutions globally and quickly to trim them down to a manageable
list
Use more than one frame when generating solutions
• How would an engineer specify the problem?
• How would a lawyer specify the problem?
• How would a manager characterize the problem?
• How would a politician specify the problem?
• How would a financial expert or economist specify the problem?
• Try to integrate these different framings.
Refined Solution ListAlternatives / Criteria
Responsiveness to Problem
Global Ethical Test Global Feasibility
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Generic Solutions (For every occasion)
• Gather more information
• Nolo Contendere
• Be diplomatic. Negotiate with the different parties. Look for a “win-win” solution
• Oppose. Stand up to authority. Organize opposition. Document and publicize the wrong
• Exit (Get a transfer. Look for another job. Live to fight another time)
• Organize these as plans A, B, C, etc. (Try one, then the other if the first doesn’t work.)
Solution Testing
Reversibility, Harm/Benefits, Publicity
Test Solutions• Develop a solution evaluation matrix
• Test the ethical implications of each solution
• See if the solution violates the code
• Carry out a global feasibility assessment of the solution.– What are the situational constraints?– Will these constraints block implementation?
Solution Evaluation MatrixAlternative / Test Reversibility Harm / Benefits Publicity (Values
Test)Code (Corporate or Professional Code of Ethics)
Will it Work? (Feasibility)
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Reversibility
• Does the action still look good when viewed from the standpoint of key stakeholders?
• Agent projects into standpoint of those targeted by the action and views it through their eyes
• Avoid extremes of too little and too much identification with stakeholder (go beyond your egocentric standpoint but don’t become lost in the perspective of the other)
Harm / Benefits
• What are the likely harms and benefits that will follow from the action under consideration?
• What is their magnitude and range?
• How are they distributed?
• Which alternative produces the most benefits coupled with the least harms?
• Avoid too much (trying to factor in all consequences) and too little (leaving out significant consequences)
Publicity Test
• What are the values embedded in the action you are considering?– Is it responsible or irresponsible? Just or unfair?
Respectful or disrespectful?
• Would you want to be publically associated with this action given the values it embodies?– People would view you as responsible, just, or
respectful; irresponsible, unjust (biased?), disrespectful
Code of Ethics Test
• How does the action accord with your profession’s or company’s code of ethics?
• How does the action accord with the key values professed by your company or profession?
Solution Implementation
Will it work given the background constraints?
A Feasibility Test—Will it Work?
• Restate your global feasibility analysis
• Are there resource constraints?– Are these fixed or negotiable?
• Are there technical or manufacturing constraints?– Are these fixed or negotiable?
• Are there interest constraints?– Are these fixed or negotiable?
Feasibility MatrixAlternative/ Constraint
Resource Interest Technical
Time Cost Individual Organizational Legal Available Technology
Manufacturability
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
What if there are major constraints?
• Try out what Westin calls the “intermediate impossible” (Practical Companion, 38)
– Take your ethically, financially, technically ideal solution
– Test its feasibility. If it is lacking…
– Modify it as little as possible until it becomes feasible. Then implement the “intermediate impossible.”
Final Considerations
• Has your problem shifted?– Check over your refined solution list and your final
solution. Sometimes the process moves from one problem to another. If so, re-specify your problem given what you have learned.
• Have you opened all possible doors to solving your problem?– Multiple framings. Resisting dilemma trap
Some Readings• Anthony Weston. (2002). A Practical Companion to Ethics: Second
Edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.– Weston has several excellent suggestions for brainstorming solutions to ethical
problems. He also discusses how to avoid the dilemma trap.
• Good Computing. (Book under development through Jones and Bartlett) (Huff, Frey, Cruz)– The manuscript describes the four-stage software development cycle that is
used as a model here for problem-solving.
• Carolyn Whitbeck. (1998). Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.– Whitbeck provides an illuminating discussion of the analogy between ethics
and design problems.
Flow Charts
Flow Charts
Flow Charts
Flow Charts