Decision-making 2: Dilemmas in Designing Forest Practices Rules 1 .
-
Upload
lee-fitzgerald -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Decision-making 2: Dilemmas in Designing Forest Practices Rules 1 .
Today’s Agenda
• Updated themes• Decision-making theories
Case: 6% solution• policy design
– Tools - instrument choice– Configuration
• Forest Practices– Code– Results-based regulation– FRPA
• Conclusion
October 30, 2014 2
New Themes
• A major challenge for forest policy making is designing policies to accommodate spatial diversity
• Forest practices regulation in BC relies on a combination of vague performance objectives, practice requirements, and planning requirements. Measurability challenges have limited efforts to develop a results-based framework
October 30, 2014 3
Readings this week
October 28, 30 – Decision-making: Dilemmas in policy design: choice of instrument, making trade-offs, optimal precision of rules
Marty Luckert, David Haley, and George Hoberg, Policies for Sustainably Managing Canada’s Forests: Provincial Tenure, Stumpage Fees, and Forest Practices, (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2011), pp. 97-102 CONCEPTS OF POLICY DESIGN AS APPLIED TO FOREST PRACTICES, ACCOMMODATING SPATIAL DIVERSITY
Forest Practices Board, A Decade in Review: Observations on Regulation of Forest and Range Practices in British Columbia
HOW FRPA IS DESIGNED, IMPLEMENTATION CONSTRAINTS (NEXT WEEK) – not responsible for specific material on PR or effectiveness monitoring
October 28, 2014 Sustainable Forest Policy 4
Instrument Configuration
• formality - guidelines or rules?• transparency• simplicity• congruence: rule varies to match problem
October 30, 2014 5
design challenge:
accommodating spatial diversity
Objective: congruent, but simple and clear
1. Vary the rules to account for different circumstances (Prescriptive congruence)
2. Rely on professional judgment (Professional delegation)
3. Rely on local plans (Geographical delegation)
October 30, 2014 7
design challenge:
accommodating spatial diversity
October 30, 2014 8
congruence transparency simplicity
Prescriptive congruence
good good poor
Professional delegation
good poor good
Geographical delegation
good medium medium
Sample Short answer question
• Using forest policy examples, describe the three approaches to accommodating spatial diversity.
October 28, 2014 Sustainable Forest Policy 9
Today’s Agenda
• Updated themes• Decision-making theories
Case: 6% solution• policy design
– Tools - instrument choice– Configuration
• Forest Practices– Code– Results-based regulation– FRPA
• Conclusion
October 30, 2014 10
BC Forest Practices: Evolution
• pre-1994 – guidelines and plans• 1995-2004 – Forest Practices Code (“the Code”)
– mix of planning and practice regulations
– considered overly costly, complex, and prescriptive by industry
– considered weak and inadequate by environmentalists
– very high compliance
October 30, 2014 11
“results-based code” 2004
• Forest Range and Practices Act (2002)– Simplified planning structure
• eliminated approval of site level plans
– increased reliance on “forest stewardship plans” to propose results and strategies to meet specified government objectives
• Major design tension: – government’s desire to have strong default standards
– industry’s desire for maximum flexibility
October 30, 2014 Hoberg – Policy Framework 12
Result-based regulation - concept
• aka Performance-based regulation• Focus on objective• Leave means up to industry• 3 components:
– Characterize desired outcomes– Specify performance standards– Measure performance
October 30, 2014 14
Result-based regulation – challenges in forestry
• For many forest values, we lack the specific knowledge to design measureable performance standards
October 30, 2014 15
but still provide flexibility in choice of practice
Standards that are sufficiently specific to be clear and measurable
FRPA solution
• Rather than government-provided performance standards, require plans to include “results or strategies”
• If operators prefer not to develop their own, they choose government “default standards”
October 30, 2014 16
FRPA Design
1. Objectives established by government2. Some performance standards3. Forest Stewardship Plan prepared by
lisencee– measurable results and strategies to
meet objectives– may choose government “defaults”– reviewed and approved by government
4. Compliance and enforcement5. Professional Reliance6. Effectiveness Monitoring
October 30, 2014 17
FRPA Regulations - Objectiveshttp://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/frpa/frparegs/frparegs.htm
• Objectives for 10 values
• In regulation, not statute
– Soils
– Timber including forest health
– Wildlife
– Riparian
– Fish
– Community watershed
– Wildlife and biodiversity – stand
– Wildlife and biodiversity – landscape
– Visual Quality
– Cultural Heritage Resources
• “without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia's forests”
October 30, 2014 18
Example FPRA Objective: Riparian
The objective set by government for water, fish, wildlife and biodiversity within riparian areas is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia's forests, to conserve, at the landscape level, the water quality, fish habitat, wildlife habitat and biodiversity associated with those riparian areas.
October 30, 2014 19
FRPA Regulations http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/frpa/frparegs/frparegs.htm
Performance-based regulation for fish passage (called a practice standard):
October 30, 2014 20
Activities must not have a material adverse effect on fish passage in a fish stream
FRPA: Forest Stewardship Plans
• 5 year plan• Map of development activities proposed• Results and strategies to address 10 FRPA
values– Or reliance on defaults
• Reviewed and approved by government• Legal document, basis for enforcement
October 30, 2014 21
FPRA “defaults” = Code rules
October 30, 2014 22
Riparian Class
Riparian Management Area
(metres)
Riparian Reserve Zone (metres)
Riparian Management Zone
(metres)
S1-A 100 0 100
S1-B 70 50 20
S2 50 30 20
S3 40 20 20
S4 30 0 30
S5 30 0 30
S6 20 0 20
Forest Practices Board “Decade in Review)
• FSPs meet legal requirements• Too many results and strategies are not
measurable or verifiable• Poor vehicles for planning and public
involvement• Surprisingly little innovation: licencees adopt
default
October 30, 2014 23
Consequence? Surprisingly little change from the Code
Sample exam question
• True or False: The key change when the BC government replaced the Forest Practices Code with the Forest Range and Practices Act is that the government established measurable, performance-based for a wide range of forest values.
October 30, 2014 24
Conclusion
• Design dilemmas – optimal specificity– Tradeoffs between
congruence, simplicity, transparency
• Due to measureability problems, FRPA not as results-based as envisioned
October 30, 2014 25
New Themes
• A major challenge for forest policy making is designing policies to accommodate spatial diversity
• Forest practices regulation in BC relies on a combination of vague performance objectives, practice requirements, and planning requirements. Measurability challenges have limited efforts to develop a results-based framework
October 30, 2014 26