December , 2010

15
1 Strategic partnership of education, science and business: new projects of the Department for Strategic Development of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science December, 2010

description

Strategic partnership of education, science and business : new projects of the Department for Strategic Development of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science . December , 2010. 1. Recent Year Solutions. Priority of scientific development : science in higher educational institutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of December , 2010

Page 1: December , 2010

1

Strategic partnership of education, science and

business: new projects of the Department for Strategic

Development of the Russian Ministry of Education and

Science

December, 2010

Page 2: December , 2010

2

Recent Year Solutions- Priority of scientific development: science in higher educational institutions- Technological development in the frames of partnership of business, education and science- Anti-crisis measures — way towards the new economy- Institutions for development, organizational structures

«Obviously, we cannot perform any modernization without profound improvements in professional education, we will have to live in a behind-the-times society in the terms of technologies»

The Russian President D. A. Medvedev

Page 3: December , 2010

3

The failure has begun

Optimistic prognosis Pessimistic prognosis

Page 4: December , 2010

4

Leading UniversitiesThe leading universities (Moscow State University and St.Petersburg State University) 2Federal universities 8National research universities 29

Yakutsk

Vladivostok

KrasnoyarskRostov

(

Kazan’

Arkhangelsk

Ekaterinburg

Tomsk

Novosibirsk

N.NovgorodPerm’

Samara

Moscow

6 НИУ

St.Petersburg2 НИУ

Page 5: December , 2010

State support for universitiesActivities 2010 2011 2012 Total

Programs of development of Moscow State University and St.Petersburg State University

5,0 3,0 2,0 10,0

Programs of development of federal universities 5,0 6,0 7,0 18,0

Second stage of scientific-research universities tender 6,0 7,0 7,0 20,0

State support of development of cooperation between Russian universities and manufacturers

6,0 6,0 7,0 19,0

Inviting leading scientists to the Russian universities 3,0 5,0 4,0 12,0

State support of development of innovative infrastructure in Russian universities

3,0 2,0 3,0 8,0

State support of scientific projects implemented jointly by the leading universities and leading scientific organizations at the basic chairs and laboratories

2,0 1,0 - 3,0

Total 30,0 30,0 30,0 90,0

Page 6: December , 2010

6

Конкурс «Программы кооперации»

1. 715 компаний подали, 553 допущены, 112 проектов победителей (1 и 2 этап)2. 107 компаний – 76 вузов3. 25 (32%) вузов являются национальными исследовательскими университетами и 6 (8%) – федеральными университетами

«Cooperation Programs» Tender

Page 7: December , 2010

7

Общий объем субсидий победителей 1 и 2 очереди:

18,06 млдр. руб

Общая сумма внебюджетных средств, привлекаемых организациями, победителями 1 и 2 очереди:

20,32 млдр. руб

Бюджет и Внебюджет

Page 8: December , 2010

8

«Программы кооперации» 2 очередь

Page 9: December , 2010

9

«Innovative Infrastructure» Tender

1.199 applications - 197 approved – 56 winners2.35 regions 3.5 universities (9%) – federal universities4.20 (36%) – national research universities5.79 universities were winners of both tenders, 26

(33%) of them were granted for innovative infrastructure and cooperation program

Page 10: December , 2010

10

Конкурс «Программы кооперации»

1.565 economic organizations were established during this year: 10 scientific-research institutes 134 universities2. Leaders among the universities:Siberia Federal University - 31 organizations, 51 workplacesTumen’ State University – 18 organizations, 102 workplaces3. 528 organizations established by 125 universities of the Russian Ministry of Science and Education

Federal law – 217

Page 11: December , 2010

11

The core of Russian universities

Innovative infrastructure

Leading ScientistsCompany-university

collaborative projects

24 25

23

82The leading universities (Moscow State University and St.Petersburg State University) 2Federal universities 6National research universities 27Others 47

Page 12: December , 2010

12

Additional Instruments

Programs of innovative development of state companies (sec.V, VI и VII)

20+27

Technological platforms – R&D priorities

Several tens

Innovative strategy ?

Page 13: December , 2010

13

Proposed Results by 20121. Increase in the volume of high-tech products since 2012

(at large enterprises) as well as in small business by universities

2. Increase in number of patent applications and issued patents

3. Increase of percentage of professors whose main income depends on projects (including increase in percentage of professors under 35 years old)

4. Change in the management system in universities and companies (openness and mutual participation)

5. Raise of professional qualification of professors and participation of companies’ specialists in educational activities

Page 14: December , 2010

14

Proposed Results 2012-2015

1. 80% of students learn according module Bachelor’s and Master’s programs

2. Serious practical work (traineeship) of students in companies and scientific organizations, not compulsory assignment to certain workplaces

3. In a range of specializations – professional certification at the workplace

4. Councils at all the universities5. 150 universities + institutes (non-violent optimization of

network)6. High universities’ income gained from scientific work and

cooperation with companies7. Academic and students’ mobility – every third student8. Dramatic decline of administrative barriers (83 Federal

law)

Page 15: December , 2010

15

Bridge to the General Education

1. Network of schools that can work with universities on the new basis (not just as enrollees suppliers), developed professional-oriented education

2. Idea of continuous competences (tolerance, ability to learn...)

3. Values and rules of school as values of innovative society

4.Continuity in the system of quality assessment