Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

DCLL R&D Evaluations Summary

Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

Dec 12-14, 2005

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

Main DCLL R&D areas

R&D Morley 47 Subtasks

Tritium Control Merrill/Willms 3 subtasks

Thermofluid MHD Smolentsev 7 subtasks

SiC/SiC Fab Process & Properties Katoh 6 subtasks

SiC/PbLi/FS Compatibility Pint 4 subtasks

FS Box Fabrication & Material Issues Rowcliffe/Kurtz/Dagher 10 subtasks

Helium Systems Subcomponent Tests Wong 2 subtasks

PbLi Hydrogen Production Merrill 1 subtask

Be Joining to FS Zinkle,Ulrickson 4 subtasks

Virtual TBM Abdou 3 subtasks

Advanced Diagnostics Morley 4 subtasks

Integrated mockup tests Tanaka/Fogarty 3 subtasks

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

Evaluating R&D Tasks Summarize the main purpose of this subtask. What critical need does this R&D

address? Is it more oriented towards (1) Establishing basic TBM feasibility for fusion (2) Understanding/predicting TBM performance required for design, or (3) Adding to safety and qualification database.

Summarize the risks to the machine or mission if this R&D is not performed. Do you have suggestions for modification of this R&D Subtask to make it more useful

or cost effective? For instance, you know of specific facilities, past work, capabilities that already exist that could be tapped for this work? Etc.

Categorize this subtask based on the following system: – E = Essential for the qualification and successful execution of the TBM experiment, and no

other party is doing it– I = Important for the qualification and successful execution of the TBM experiment, or

Essential but is definitely being done by another party– D = Desirable but the risk is acceptable if not performed

Categorize this subtask schedule over the next 10 year period based on the following system

– B = Beginning 3-4 years. Needed immediately for preliminary design choices– M = Middle 3-4 years. Needed in the middle of the next 10 years after initial R&D is

performed (for instance for qualification or integrated effects tests).– E = Ending 3-4 years. Needed before performance of first experiments or is specific for

subsequent modules

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

10 year R&D Cost Estimate Summary (burdened, 2005 dollars, no contingency)

R&D ~$47.3M

Tritium Permeation ($2.8M)+$1m

Thermofluid MHD $10M

SiC/SiC Fab Process & Properties $2.25M

SiC/PbLi/FS Compatibility $.75M

FS Box Fabrication & Material Issues $15M

Helium Systems Subcomponent Tests $.84M

PbLi Hydrogen Production $2.4M

Be Joining to FS (TBM PFC) $4.7M

Virtual TBM $4.3M

Advanced Diagnostics $2.7M

Integrated mockup tests $4.34M

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

DCLL 1st Test Module Fabrication Schedule Summary

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Administration

R&D

Thermofluid & Performance R&D

Fabrication and Properties R&D

Partially Integrated Tests

Engineering

Preliminary Design

Detailed Design

Title III Activities (Fab Support)

TBM Fabrication

Bid Package Contract Award

Material Procurement

Tooling & Processing

Prototype Fabrication

TBM Fabrication

Assembly, Testing, and Installation

Prototype Packaging & Shipping

Prototype Testing

TBM QA Tests

TBM Packing and Shipping

TBM Assembly & Port Integration

DCLL Test Module Schedule

First plasmaQualification Criteria Safety Dossier

TBMExperiment Execution

Permission to Install

TBMExperiment Execution

*Prototype may or may not be full scale

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

Main DCLL TBM R&D areas

R&D Morley 47 Subtasks

Tritium Control Merrill/Willms 3 subtasks

Thermofluid MHD Smolentsev 7 subtasks

SiC/SiC Fab Process & Properties Katoh 6 subtasks

SiC/PbLi/FS Compatibility Pint 4 subtasks

FS Box Fabrication & Material Issues Rowcliffe/Kurtz/Dagher 10 subtasks

Helium Systems Subcomponent Tests Wong 2 subtasks

PbLi Hydrogen Production Merrill 1 subtask

Be Joining to FS Zinkle,Ulrickson 4 subtasks

Virtual TBM Abdou 3 subtasks

Advanced Diagnostics Morley 4 subtasks

Integrated mockup tests Tanaka/Fogarty 3 subtasks

Yellow indicates some disagreement

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

Resolving remaining conflicts

Let me speak to coordinator and people offering dissenting opinions and make a judgment for the first draft of the report

People can make a case offering a different opinion and we will note it in the report as well

Other suggestions? Committee, etc…

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

What needs to be provided/written by task coordinators by Dec 23

Review the WBS structure (Attachment 1) and provide any suggested changes before proceeding with the following actions. Create lower level WBS elements to the point where costs will be collected (subtask level either 6 or 7).

Prepare a brief description of the work scope content for each WBS element for which you are responsible utilizing the format provided in Attachment 2. These descriptions should clearly reflect what is included or excluded from the associated estimate and the basis for the scope and requirements.

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

What needs to be written (cont.)

Fill in the detailed cost sheet (Attachment 3), one for each WBS subtask level 6 and 7. For the current pre CD-0 cost activity, it is not necessary to have every element on the form completed, but where the detail is available, please provide it. Contingency is not included in the base cost.

Complete Attachment 4 by summarizing the detailed cost sheets completed in action 3.

Using Tables 2 and 3, fill in the assessment of the technical, cost, and schedule risks and the weighting factors on the bottom section of the detailed cost sheets generated in step 4 (Attachment 3) (one for each WBS level 6 and 7).

Dec 12-14, 2005 TBM Planning and Costing Meeting

What needs to be written (cont.)

Using the format in Attachment 4, provide a schedule network (list of activities and durations) for all of your Level 6 and 7 WBS elements, with at least 3 activities listed for each WBS element. When designating predecessors or successor activities, please be sure to consider activities that must be done by other participants and the Planning Milestones (see attachment 5). List key assumptions.

Review the milestones provided in Attachment 5; suggest others to show start or finish of significant project tasks. Provide the expected completion dates.

For each WBS level 5 (or below) list and describe the major risks utilizing Attachment 6 and the guidelines in Tables 4 – 6.