Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the...

24
Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist, and her husband, Dr. Michael Farrar, had an opulent home in an exclusive Kansas City suburb. Michael, a cardiologist, had a successful practice that enabled Debora to stay home to raise their three loving children, Tim, Kate, and Kelly. In late 1995, Michael Farrar was hospitalized for a mysterious illness. Michael entered a revolving door of excruciating stomach pain and recovery, framed in the context of his failing marriage. Unknown to outsiders, Michael had initially asked Debora for a divorce in 1994. Michael’s suspicion of foul play was aroused when he found a large number of castor bean packets in Debora’s purse. She had used the castor beans to poison Michael’s food; they contain ricin, a deadly poison. On the night of October 24, 1995, the Green house became engulfed in flames and was destroyed. Michael Farrar was sleeping elsewhere while the couple were beginning a legal separation preceding their divorce. Their daughter Kate, then 10 years old, escaped the fire by exiting her bedroom window, scaling the garage roof, and jumping to safety into the arms of her mother, who was standing outside the house. Their son Tim, 13, and daughter Kelly, 6, were killed in the blaze that consumed their home. Fire investigators quickly realized that they were confronting a criminal case of arson. Unconnected fires had occurred in various rooms of the house. Throughout the first floor of the house, pour patterns were obvious where someone had spread accelerants—flammable substances used to spread the fire more quickly—on the floors. Heavy soaking of the carpet on the stairways leading to the children’s rooms would have created a wall of fire effectively blocking the children’s escape route. This arsonist was also a murderer. Police arrested Debora and charged her with two counts of first-degree murder and aggravated arson. Psychological evaluation of the defendant concluded that she had a schizoid personality that was masked by a high degree of intelligence. Debora Green is currently serving a life sentence in a Missouri prison. Her psychotic behavior became the subject of Ann Rule’s novel Bitter Harvest.

Transcript of Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the...

Page 1: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Debora Green—Poisoning the American DreamOn the face of it, the Farrar family had it all.Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist, andher husband, Dr. Michael Farrar, had an opulenthome in an exclusive Kansas City suburb. Michael, acardiologist, had a successful practice that enabledDebora to stay home to raise their three lovingchildren, Tim, Kate, and Kelly.

In late 1995, Michael Farrar was hospitalizedfor a mysterious illness. Michael entered a revolvingdoor of excruciating stomach pain and recovery,framed in the context of his failing marriage.Unknown to outsiders, Michael had initially askedDebora for a divorce in 1994.

Michael’s suspicion of foul play was arousedwhen he found a large number of castor beanpackets in Debora’s purse. She had used the castorbeans to poison Michael’s food; they contain ricin, adeadly poison.

On the night of October 24, 1995, the Greenhouse became engulfed in flames and wasdestroyed. Michael Farrar was sleeping elsewherewhile the couple were beginning a legal separationpreceding their divorce. Their daughter Kate, then10 years old, escaped the fire by exiting her

bedroom window, scaling the garage roof, andjumping to safety into the arms of her mother, whowas standing outside the house. Their son Tim, 13,and daughter Kelly, 6, were killed in the blaze thatconsumed their home.

Fire investigators quickly realized that theywere confronting a criminal case of arson.Unconnected fires had occurred in various rooms ofthe house. Throughout the first floor of the house,pour patterns were obvious where someone hadspread accelerants—flammable substances used tospread the fire more quickly—on the floors. Heavysoaking of the carpet on the stairways leading tothe children’s rooms would have created a wall offire effectively blocking the children’s escape route.This arsonist was also a murderer.

Police arrested Debora and charged her withtwo counts of first-degree murder and aggravatedarson. Psychological evaluation of the defendantconcluded that she had a schizoid personality thatwas masked by a high degree of intelligence.Debora Green is currently serving a life sentence ina Missouri prison. Her psychotic behavior becamethe subject of Ann Rule’s novel Bitter Harvest.

Page 2: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Key Terms

accelerant

combustion

endothermic reaction

energy

exothermic reaction

flammable range

flash point

glowing combustion

heat of combustion

hydrocarbon

ignition temperature

modus operandi

oxidation

pyrolysis

spontaneous combustion

Page 3: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

424 CHAPTER 12

Forensic Investigation of ArsonArson often presents complex and difficult circumstances to investigate.Normally these incidents are committed at the convenience of a perpetra-tor who has thoroughly planned the criminal act and has left the crimescene long before any official investigation is launched. Furthermore,proving commission of the offense is more difficult because of the extensivedestruction that frequently dominates the crime scene. The contribution ofthe criminalist is only one aspect of a comprehensive and difficult inves-tigative process that must establish a motive, the modus operandi, and asuspect.

The criminalist’s function is limited; usually he or she is expected only todetect and identify relevant chemical materials collected at the scene and toreconstruct and identify igniters. Although a chemist can identify traceamounts of gasoline or kerosene in debris, no scientific test can determinewhether an arsonist has used a pile of rubbish or paper to start a fire.Furthermore, a fire can have many accidental causes, including faulty wiring,overheated electric motors, improperly cleaned and regulated heatingsystems, and cigarette smoking—which usually leave no chemical traces.Thus, the final determination of the cause of a fire must consider numerousfactors and requires an extensive on-site investigation. The ultimate deter-mination must be made by an investigator whose training and knowledgehave been augmented by the practical experiences of fire investigation.

The Chemistry of FireHumankind’s early search to explain the physical concepts underlying thebehavior of matter always bestowed a central and fundamental role on fire.To ancient Greek philosophers, fire was one of the four basic elementsfrom which all matter was derived. The medieval alchemist thought of fireas an instrument of transformation, capable of changing one element intoanother. One ancient recipe expresses its mystical power as follows: “Nowthe substance of cinnabar is such that the more it is heated, the more ex-quisite are its sublimations. Cinnabar will become mercury, and passingthrough a series of other sublimations, it is again turned into cinnabar, andthus it enables man to enjoy eternal life.”

Today, we know of fire not as an element of matter but as a transfor-mation process during which oxygen is united with some other substanceto produce noticeable quantities of heat and light (a flame). Therefore, anyinsight into why and how a fire is initiated and sustained must begin withthe knowledge of the fundamental chemical reaction of fire—oxidation.

■ List the conditions necessary to initiate and sustaincombustion

■ Understand the three mechanisms of heat transfer

■ Recognize the telltale signs of an accelerant-initiatedfire

■ Describe how to collect physical evidence at the sceneof a suspected arson

■ Describe laboratory procedures used to detect andidentify hydrocarbon residues

Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter you should be able to:

oxidationThe combination of oxygen

with other substances to

produce new substances.

modus operandiAn offender’s pattern of

operation.

Page 4: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 425

OxidationIn a simple description of oxidation, oxygen combines with other substancesto produce new products. Thus, we may write the chemical equation for theburning of methane gas, a major component of natural gas, as follows:

CH4 � 2O2 CO2 � 2H2Omethane oxygen yields carbon dioxide water

However, not all oxidation proceeds in the manner that one associates withfire. For example, oxygen combines with many metals to form oxides. Thus,iron forms a red-brown iron oxide, or rust, as follows (see Figure 12–1):

4Fe � 3O2 2Fe2O3

iron oxygen yields iron oxide

Yet chemical equations do not give us a complete insight into the oxidationprocess. We must consider other factors to understand all of the implicationsof oxidation or, for that matter, any other chemical reaction. Methane burnswhen it unites with oxygen, but merely mixing methane and oxygen does notproduce a fire. Nor, for example, does gasoline burn when it is simply exposedto air. However, lighting a match in the presence of any one of these fuel–airmixtures (assuming proper proportions) produces an instant fire.

What are the reasons behind these differences? Why do some oxida-tions proceed with the outward appearances that we associate with a firewhile others do not? Why do we need a match to initiate some oxidations

FIGURE 12–1 Rust formingon iron is an example ofoxidation. Courtesy NicholaGissing–Debut Art, GettyImages–Digital Vision

Page 5: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

endothermic reactionA chemical transformation in

which heat energy is absorbed

from the surroundings.

heat of combustionThe heat liberated during

combustion.

exothermic reactionA chemical transformation in

which heat energy is liberated.

combustionRapid combination of oxygen

with another substance,

accompanied by production of

noticeable heat and light.

426 CHAPTER 12

while others proceed at room temperature? The explanation lies in a fun-damental but abstract concept—energy.

EnergyEnergy can be defined as the ability or potential of a system or material to dowork. Energy takes many forms, such as heat energy, electrical energy, me-chanical energy, nuclear energy, light energy, and chemical energy. Forexample, when methane is burned, the stored chemical energy in methane isconverted to energy in the form of heat and light. This heat may be used toboil water or to provide high-pressure steam to turn a turbine. This is anexample of converting chemical energy to heat energy to mechanical energy.The turbine can then be used to generate electricity, transforming mechani-cal energy to electrical energy. Electrical energy may then be used to turn amotor. In other words, energy can enable work to be done; heat is energy.

The quantity of heat from a chemical reaction comes from the breakingand formation of chemical bonds. Methane is a molecule composed of onecarbon atom bonded with four hydrogen atoms:

H

H—|

|C—H

H

An oxygen molecule forms when two atoms of the element oxygen bond:

O � O

In chemical changes, atoms are not lost but merely redistributed during thechemical reaction; thus, the products of methane’s oxidation will be carbondioxide:

O � C � O

and water:

H—O—H

This rearrangement, however, means that the chemical bonds holdingthe atoms together must be broken and new bonds formed. We now havearrived at a fundamental observation in our dissection of a chemicalreaction—that molecules must absorb energy to break apart their chemicalbonds, and that they liberate energy when their bonds are re-formed.

The amount of energy needed to break a bond and the amount of en-ergy liberated when a bond is formed are characteristic of the type ofchemical bond involved. Hence, a chemical reaction involves a change inenergy content; energy is going in and energy is given off. The quantitiesof energies involved are different for each reaction and are determined bythe participants in the chemical reaction.

CombustionAll oxidation reactions, including the combustion of methane, are exam-ples of reactions in which more energy is liberated than is required tobreak the chemical bonds between atoms. Such reactions are said to beexothermic. The excess energy is liberated as heat, and often as light, andis known as the heat of combustion. Table 12–1 summarizes the heats ofcombustion of some important fuels in fire investigation.

Although we will not be concerned with them, some reactions requiremore energy than they eventually liberate. These reactions are known asendothermic reactions.

energyThe ability or potential of a

system or material to do work.

Page 6: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

ignition temperatureThe minimum temperature at

which a fuel spontaneously

ignites.

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 427

CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O

FIGURE 12–2 An energy barrier must be hurdled before reactants such as methane andoxygen can combine with one another to form the products of carbon dioxide and water.

Thus, all reactions require an energy input to start them. We can thinkof this requirement as an invisible energy barrier between the reactantsand the products of a reaction (see Figure 12–2). The higher this barrier, themore energy required to initiate the reaction. Where does this initialenergy come from? There are many sources of energy; however, for thepurpose of this discussion we need to look at only one—heat.

Heat The energy barrier in the conversion of iron to rust is relativelysmall, and it can be surmounted with the help of heat energy in thesurrounding environment at normal outdoor temperatures. Not so formethane or gasoline; these energy barriers are quite high, and a hightemperature must be applied to start the oxidation of these fuels. Hence,before any fire can result, the temperature of these fuels must be raisedenough to exceed the energy barrier. Table 12–2 shows that this tempera-ture, known as the ignition temperature, is quite high for common fuels.

Once combustion starts, enough heat is liberated to keep the reactiongoing by itself. In essence, the fire becomes a chain reaction, absorbing aportion of its own liberated heat to generate even more heat. The fireburns until either the oxygen or the fuel is exhausted.

Normally, a lighted match provides a convenient igniter of fuels.However, the fire investigator must also consider other potential sources

Table 12–1 Heats of Combustion of Fuels

Fuel Heat of Combustiona

Crude oil 19,650 Btu/gal

Diesel fuel 19,550 Btu/lb

Gasoline 19,250 Btu/lb

Methane 995 Btu/cu ft

Natural gas 128–1,868 Btu/cu ft

Octane 121,300 Btu/gal

Wood 7,500 Btu/lb

Coal, bituminous 11,000–14,000 Btu/lb

Anthracite 13,351 Btu/lb

aBtu (British thermal unit) is defined as the quantity of heat required to raise thetemperature of 1 pound of water 1°F at or near its point of maximum density.

Source: John D. DeHaan, Kirk’s Fire Investigation, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1983.

Page 7: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

428 CHAPTER 12

of ignition—for example, electrical discharges, sparks, and chemicals—whilereconstructing the initiation of a fire. All of these sources have tempera-tures higher than the ignition temperature of most fuels.

Speed of Reaction Although the liberation of energy explains many im-portant features of oxidation, it does not explain all characteristics of thereaction. Obviously, although all oxidations liberate energy, not all are ac-companied by a flame; witness the oxidation of iron to rust. Therefore, oneother important consideration will make our understanding of oxidationand fire complete: the rate or speed at which the reaction takes place.

A chemical reaction, such as oxidation, takes place when moleculescombine or collide with one another. The faster the molecules move, thegreater the number of collisions between them and the faster the rate ofreaction. Many factors influence the rate of these collisions. In our de-scription of fire and oxidation, we consider only two: the physical state ofthe fuel and the temperature.

Physical State of Fuel A fuel achieves a reaction rate with oxygen suf-ficient to produce a flame only when it is in the gaseous state, for only inthis state molecules can collide frequently enough to support a flaming fire.This remains true whether the fuel is a solid such as wood, paper, cloth, orplastic, or a liquid such as gasoline or kerosene.

For example, the conversion of iron to rust proceeds slowly becausethe iron atoms cannot achieve a gaseous state. The combination of oxygenwith iron is thus restricted to the surface area of the metal exposed to air,a limitation that severely reduces the rate of reaction. On the other hand,the reaction of methane and oxygen proceeds rapidly because all the reac-tants are in the gaseous state. The speed of the reaction is reflected by theproduction of noticeable quantities of heat and light (a flame).

Fuel Temperature How then does a liquid or solid maintain a gaseousreaction? In the case of a liquid fuel, the temperature must be high enoughto vaporize the fuel. The vapor that forms burns when it mixes with oxy-gen and combusts as a flame. The flash point is the lowest temperature atwhich a liquid gives off sufficient vapor to form a mixture with air that willsupport combustion. Once the flash point is reached, the fuel can be ig-nited by some outside source of temperature to start a fire. The ignitiontemperature of a fuel is always considerably higher than the flash point.

flash pointThe minimum temperature at

which a liquid fuel produces

enough vapor to burn.

Table 12–2 Ignition Temperatures of Some Common Fuels

Fuel Ignition Temperature, °F

Acetone 869

Benzene 928

Fuel oil #2 495

Gasoline (low octane) 536

Kerosene (fuel oil #1) 410

n-Octane 428

Petroleum ether 550

Turpentine 488

Source: John D. DeHaan, Kirk’s Fire Investigation, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1997.

Page 8: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 429

For example, gasoline has a flash point of �50°F; however, an ignition tem-perature of 495°F is needed to start a gasoline fire.

With a solid fuel such as wood, the process of generating vapor is morecomplex. A solid fuel burns only when exposed to heat intense enough todecompose the solid into gaseous products. This chemical breakdown ofsolid material is known as pyrolysis. The gaseous products of pyrolysiscombine with oxygen to produce a fire (see Figure 12–3). Here again, firecan be described as a chain reaction. A match or other source of heat ini-tiates the pyrolysis of the solid fuel, the gaseous products react with oxy-gen in the air to produce heat and light, and this heat in turn pyrolyzesmore solid fuel into volatile gases.

Typically, the rate of a chemical reaction increases when the tempera-ture is raised. The magnitude of the increase varies from one reaction toanother and also from one temperature range to another. For most reac-tions, a 10°C (18°F) rise in temperature doubles or triples the reaction rate.This observation explains in part why burning is so rapid. As the firespreads, it raises the temperature of the fuel–air mixture, thus increasingthe rate of reaction; this in turn generates more heat, again increasing therate of reaction. Only when the fuel or oxygen is depleted does this viciouscycle come to a halt.

The Fuel–Air Mix As we have seen from our discussion about gaseous fuel,air (oxygen) and sufficient heat are the basic ingredients of a flaming fire.There is also one other consideration—the gas fuel–air mix. A mixture ofgaseous fuel and air burns only if its composition lies within certain limits.If the fuel concentration is too low (lean) or too great (rich), combustion

FIGURE 12–3 Intense heat causes solid fuels such as wood to decompose into gaseousproducts, a process called pyrolysis. Courtesy David Trood/Image Bank/Getty Images

pyrolysisThe decomposition of solid

organic matter by heat.

Page 9: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

430 CHAPTER 12

does not occur. The concentration range between the upper and lowerlimits is called the flammable range. For example, the flammable rangefor gasoline is 1.3–6.0 percent. Thus, in order for a gasoline–air mix to burn,gasoline must make up at least 1.3 percent, and no more than 6 percent, ofthe mixture.

Glowing Combustion Although a flaming fire can be supported only by agaseous fuel, in some instances a fuel can burn without a flame. Witness aburning cigarette or the red glow of hot charcoals (see Figure 12–4). Theseare examples of glowing combustion or smoldering. Here combustionoccurs on the surface of a solid fuel in the absence of heat high enough topyrolyze the fuel. Interestingly, this phenomenon generally ensues longafter the flames have gone out. Wood, for example, tends to burn with aflame until all of its pyrolyzable components have been expended; how-ever, wood’s carbonaceous residue continues to smolder long after theflame has extinguished itself.

Spontaneous Combustion One interesting phenomenon often invoked byarson suspects as the cause of a fire is spontaneous combustion. Actually,the conditions under which spontaneous combustion can develop arerather limited and rarely account for the cause of a fire. Spontaneouscombustion is the result of a natural heat-producing process in poorlyventilated containers or areas. For example, hay stored in barns providesan excellent growing medium for bacteria whose activities generate heat.If the hay is not properly ventilated, the heat builds to a level that supportsother types of heat-producing chemical reactions in the hay. Eventually, asthe heat rises, the ignition temperature of hay is reached, spontaneouslysetting off a fire.

FIGURE 12–4 Red-hot charcoals are an example of glowing combustion. Courtesy PaulSisul/Stone/Getty Images

glowing combustionCombustion on the surface of

a solid fuel in the absence of

heat high enough to pyrolyze

the fuel.

flammable rangeThe entire range of possible

gas or vapor fuel

concentrations in air that are

capable of burning.

spontaneouscombustionA fire caused by a natural

heat-producing process in the

presence of sufficient air and

fuel.

Page 10: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 431

Another example of spontaneous combustion involves the ignition ofimproperly ventilated containers containing rags soaked with certain typesof highly unsaturated oils, such as linseed oil. Heat can build up to the pointof ignition as a result of a slow heat-producing chemical oxidation betweenthe air and the oil. Of course, storage conditions must encourage the accu-mulation of the heat over a prolonged period of time. However, sponta-neous combustion does not occur with hydrocarbon lubricating oils, and itis not expected to occur with most household fats and oils.

In summary, three requirements must be satisfied to initiate andsustain combustion:

1. A fuel must be present.

2. Oxygen must be available in sufficient quantity to combine withthe fuel.

3. Heat must be applied to initiate the combustion, and sufficient heatmust be generated to sustain the reaction.

Heat TransferConsider how a structural fire begins. The typical scenario starts with heatignition at a single location. It may be an arsonist lighting a gasoline-soaked rag, a malfunctioning electric appliance sparking, or an individualfalling asleep while smoking a cigarette in bed. How does a flame initiallyconfined to a single location spread to engulf an entire structure? Under-standing the anatomy of a fire begins with comprehending how heat travelsthrough a burning structure.

The previous section stressed the importance of the role of heat ingenerating sufficient fuel vapors to support combustion, as well as therequirement that the heat source be hot enough to ignite the fuel’s vapor.Once the fire begins, the heat generated by the fuel’s reaction with air isfed back into the fuel–air mix to keep the chemical reaction going.

As a fire progresses, the heat created by the combustion process tendsto move from a high-temperature region to one at a lower temperature.Understanding heat transfer from one location to another is important forreconstructing the origin of a fire, as well as for understanding why andhow fire spreads through a structure. The three mechanisms of heat trans-fer are conduction, radiation, and convection.

Conduction Movement of heat through a solid object is caused by a processcalled conduction, in which electrons and atoms within the heated objectcollide with one another. Heat always travels from hot areas of a solid tocold ones by conduction. Solids whose atoms or molecules have looselyheld electrons are good conductors of heat. Metals have the most looselyheld electrons and are therefore excellent conductors of heat. Thus, whenyou insert one end of a metal object into an open flame, the entire objectquickly becomes hot to the touch.

Materials that have electrons firmly attached to their molecules are poorconductors of heat. Poor conductors are called insulators. Wood is a goodinsulator; for that reason, metal objects that are subject to intense heat (suchas skillets and saucepans) often have wooden handles (see Figure 12–5).

In reconstructing a fire scene, it’s important to keep in mind that heatmay be transported through metals such as beams, nails, fasteners, bolts,and other good conductors to a location far from the initial heat source. Anyfuel in contact with the conductor may be ignited, creating a new fire loca-tion. On the other hand, the conductivity of wood, plastic, and paper are

Page 11: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

432 CHAPTER 12

very low, meaning that heat emanating from these surfaces does not spreadwell and does not cause ignitions far from the initial heat source.

Radiation Radiation is the transfer of heat energy from a heated surfaceto a cooler surface by electromagnetic radiation. A hot surface emits elec-tromagnetic radiation of various wavelengths, and in a fire scene theelectromagnetic radiation moves in a straight line from one surface to an-other. Radiant heat plays a key role in understanding how fire spreadsthroughout a structure. For example, all surfaces that face the fire are ex-posed to radiant heat and burst into flames when the surface reaches theirignition temperature. In very large fires, nearby structures and vehicles areoften ignited at a distance by radiant heat.

Convection Convection is the transfer of heat energy by movement ofmolecules within a liquid or gas. Water being heated on a stove illustratesthe concept of convection. As the water molecules on the bottom of the potmove faster they spread apart and become less dense, causing them tomove upward. Denser, cooler water molecules then migrate to the bottomof the pot. In this way convection currents keep the fluid stirred up aswarmer fluid moves away from the heat source and cooler fluid moves to-ward the heat source. Likewise, warm air expands, becoming less denseand causing it to rise and move toward the cooler surrounding air.

In a structural fire, the gaseous hot products of combustion expand, andconvection moves the hot gases to the upper portions of the structure (seeFigure 12–6). The convected hot gases become a source of heat, radiatingheat energy downward onto all the surfaces below them. The hot surfacesof the exposed objects often pyrolyze or break down, releasing gaseousmolecules. The phenomenon known as flashover occurs when all the com-bustible fuels simultaneously ignite, engulfing the entire structure in flame.

FIGURE 12–5 The wooden handle on this saucepan is a poor conductor of heat. CourtesyTopham, The Image Works

Page 12: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 433

Key Points

• Oxidation is the combination of oxygen with other substances toproduce new substances.

• Combustion is rapid combination of oxygen with another substance,accompanied by production of noticeable heat and light.

• In an exothermic reaction, heat energy is liberated. In an endothermicreaction, heat energy is absorbed from the surroundings.

• Pyrolysis is the chemical breakdown of solid organic matter by heat. Thegaseous products of pyrolysis combine with oxygen to produce a fire.

• Spontaneous combustion is fire caused by a natural heat-producingprocess in the presence of sufficient air and fuel.

• To initiate and sustain combustion, (1) a fuel must be present, (2) oxygenmust be available in sufficient quantity to combine with the fuel, and (3) heat must be applied to initiate the combustion, and sufficient heatmust be generated to sustain the reaction.

• The three mechanisms of heat transfer are conduction, radiation, andconvection. Conduction is the movement of heat through a solid object.Radiation is the transfer of heat energy from a heated surface to acooler surface by electromagnetic radiation. Convection is the transferof heat energy by the movement of molecules within a liquid or gas.

FIGURE 12–6 Convectioncauses flames to rise to theupper floor of a burningstructure. Courtesy DaveFrazier, Danita DelimontPhotography

Page 13: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

434 CHAPTER 12

Searching the Fire SceneThe arson investigator should begin examining a fire scene for signs ofarson as soon as the fire has been extinguished. Most arsons are startedwith petroleum-based accelerants such as gasoline or kerosene. Thus, thepresence of containers capable of holding an accelerant arouse suspicionsof arson. Discovery of an ignition device ranging in sophistication from acandle to a time-delay device is another indication of possible arson.A common telltale sign of arson may be an irregularly shaped pattern on afloor or on the ground (see Figure 12–7) resulting from pouring an accel-erant onto the surface. In addition to these visual indicators, investigatorsshould look for signs of breaking and entering and theft, and they shouldbegin interviewing any eyewitnesses to the fire.

Timeliness of InvestigationTime constantly works against the arson investigator. Any accelerantresidues that remain after a fire is extinguished may evaporate within a fewdays or even hours. Furthermore, safety and health conditions may neces-sitate that cleanup and salvage operations begin as quickly as possible.Once this occurs, a meaningful investigation of the fire scene is impossible.Accelerants in soil and vegetation can be rapidly degraded by bacterial ac-tion. Freezing samples containing soil or vegetation is an effective way toprevent this degradation.

The need to begin an immediate investigation of the circumstances sur-rounding a fire even takes precedence over the requirement to obtain asearch warrant to enter and search the premises. The Supreme Court, ex-plaining its position on this issue, stated in part:

. . . Fire officials are charged not only with extinguishing fires, butwith finding their causes. Prompt determination of the fire’s originmay be necessary to prevent its recurrence, as through the detec-tion of continuing dangers such as faulty wiring or a defective fur-nace. Immediate investigation may also be necessary to preserve

FIGURE 12–7 Irregularly shaped patternon the ground resulting from a pouredignitable liquid. Courtesy Franklin CountyCrime Scene Unit, North Carolina

accelerantAny material used to start or

sustain a fire.

Page 14: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 435

evidence from intentional or accidental destruction. And, of course,the sooner the officials complete their duties, the less will be theirsubsequent interference with the privacy and the recovery effortsof the victims. For these reasons, officials need no warrant to re-main in a building for a reasonable time to investigate the cause ofa blaze after it has been extinguished. And if the warrantless entryto put out the fire and determine its cause is constitutional, the war-rantless seizure of evidence while inspecting the premises for thesepurposes also is constitutional. . . .

In determining what constitutes a reasonable time to investigate, appro-priate recognition must be given to the exigencies that confront officialsserving under these conditions, as well as to individuals’ reasonableexpectations of privacy.1

Locating the Fire’s OriginA search of the fire scene must focus on finding the fire’s origin, which willprove most productive in any search for an accelerant or ignition device.In searching for a fire’s specific point of origin, the investigator may un-cover telltale signs of arson such as evidence of separate and unconnectedfires or the use of “streamers” to spread the fire from one area to another.For example, the arsonist may have spread a trail of gasoline or paper tocause the fire to move rapidly from one room to another.

There are no fast and simple rules for identifying a fire’s origin.Normally a fire tends to move upward, and thus the probable origin ismost likely closest to the lowest point that shows the most intense char-acteristics of burning. Sometimes as the fire burns upward, a V-shapedpattern forms against a vertical wall, as shown in Figure 12–8. Becauseflammable liquids always flow to the lowest point, more severe burningfound on the floor than on the ceiling may indicate the presence of an ac-celerant. If a flammable liquid was used, charring is expected to be moreintense on the bottom of furniture, shelves, and other items rather thanthe top.

FIGURE 12–8 Typical V patterns illustrating upward movement of the fire. Courtesy JohnLentini

Page 15: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

436 CHAPTER 12

However, many factors can contribute to the deviation of a fire fromnormal behavior. Prevailing drafts and winds; secondary fires due tocollapsing floors and roofs; the physical arrangement of the burningstructure; stairways and elevator shafts; holes in the floor, wall, or roof;and the effects of the firefighter in suppressing the fire are all factorsthat the fire investigator must consider before determining conclusivefindings.

Once located, the point of origin should be protected to permit carefulinvestigation. As at any crime scene, nothing should be touched or movedbefore notes, sketches, and photographs are taken. An examination mustalso be made for possible accidental causes, as well as for evidence of ar-son. The most common materials used by an arsonist to ensure the rapidspread and intensity of a fire are gasoline and kerosene or, for that matter,any volatile flammable liquid.

Searching for AccelerantsFortunately, only under the most ideal conditions will combustible liquidsbe entirely consumed during a fire. When the liquid is poured over a largearea, a portion of it will likely seep into a porous surface, such as cracks inthe floor, upholstery, rags, plaster, wallboards, or carpet. Enough of theliquid may remain unchanged to permit its detection in the crime labora-tory. In addition, when a fire is extinguished with water, the evaporationrate of volatile fluids may be slowed, because water cools and covers ma-terials through which the combustible liquid may have soaked. Fortunately,water does not interfere with laboratory methods used to detect andcharacterize flammable liquid residues.

The search for traces of flammable liquid residues may be aided by theuse of a sensitive portable vapor detector or “sniffer” (see Figure 12–9).This device can rapidly screen suspect materials for volatile residues by sucking in the air surrounding the questioned sample. The air ispassed over a heated filament; if a combustible vapor is present, it oxi-dizes and immediately increases the temperature of the filament. Therise in filament temperature is then registered as a deflection on the de-tector’s meter.

Of course, such a device is not a conclusive test for a flammable vapor,but it is an excellent screening device for checking suspect samples at thefire scene. Another approach is to use dogs that have been trained to rec-ognize the odor of hydrocarbon accelerants.

FIGURE 12–9 Portable hydrocarbon detector. Courtesy Sirchie Finger Print Laboratories, Inc.,Youngsville, N.C., www.sirchie.com

Page 16: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 437

FIGURE 12–10 Varioussizes of paint cans suitablefor collecting debris at firescenes. Courtesy Sirchie FingerPrint Laboratories, Inc.,Youngsville, N.C.,www.sirchie.com

Collection and Preservation of Arson EvidenceTwo to 3 quarts of ash and soot debris must be collected at the point oforigin of a fire when arson is suspected. The collection should include allporous materials and all other substances thought likely to contain flam-mable residues. These include such things as wood flooring, rugs, uphol-stery, and rags.

Packaging and Preservation of EvidenceSpecimens should be packaged immediately in airtight containers sopossible residues are not lost through evaporation. New, clean paintcans with friction lids are good containers because they are low cost, air-tight, unbreakable, and available in a variety of sizes (see Figure 12–10).Wide-mouthed glass jars are also useful for packaging suspect speci-mens, provided that they have airtight lids. Cans and jars should be filledone-half to two-thirds full, leaving an air space in the container abovethe debris.

Large bulky samples should be cut to size at the scene as needed so thatthey will fit into available containers. Plastic polyethylene bags are not suit-able for packaging specimens because they react with hydrocarbons andpermit volatile hydrocarbon vapors to be depleted. Fluids found in openbottles or cans must be collected and sealed. Even when such containersappear empty, the investigator is wise to seal and preserve them in casethey contain trace amounts of liquids or vapors.

Substrate ControlThe collection of all materials suspected of containing volatile liquids mustbe accompanied by a thorough sampling of similar but uncontaminatedcontrol specimens from another area of the fire scene. This is known assubstrate control. For example, if an investigator collects carpeting at thepoint of origin, he or she must sample the same carpet from another partof the room, where it can be reasonably assumed that no flammable sub-stance was placed.

In the laboratory, the criminalist checks the substrate control tobe sure that it is free of any flammables. This procedure reduces thepossibility (and subsequent argument) that the carpet was exposed to

Page 17: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

438 CHAPTER 12

a flammable liquid such as a cleaning solution during normal mainte-nance. In addition, laboratory tests on the unburned control material mayhelp analyze the breakdown products from the material’s exposure to intense heat during the fire. Common materials such as plastic floor tiles,carpet, linoleum, and adhesives can produce volatile hydrocarbons whenthey are burned. These breakdown products can sometimes be mistakenfor an accelerant.

Igniters and Other EvidenceThe scene should also be thoroughly searched for igniters. The most com-mon igniter is a match. Normally the match is completely consumed dur-ing a fire and is impossible to locate. However, there have been cases inwhich, by force of habit, matches have been extinguished and tossed asideonly to be recovered later by the investigator. This evidence may provevaluable if the criminalist can fit the match to a book found in the posses-sion of a suspect, as shown in Figure 12–11.

Arsonists can construct many other types of devices to start a fire.These include burning cigarettes, firearms, ammunition, a mechanicalmatch striker, electrical sparking devices, and a “Molotov cocktail”—aglass bottle containing flammable liquid with a cloth rag stuffed into it andlit as a fuse. Relatively complex mechanical devices are much more likely tosurvive the fire for later discovery. The broken glass and wick of the Molotovcocktail, if recovered, must be preserved as well.

One important piece of evidence is the clothing of the suspect perpe-trator. If this individual is arrested within a few hours of initiating the fire,residual quantities of the accelerant may still be present in the clothing. As we will see in the next section, the forensic laboratory can detectextremely small quantities of accelerants, making the examination of

FIGURE 12–11 Three matches (Spec. 3, 4, 5) discarded at the scene of an arson are eachshown to fit into a matchbook (Spec. 1) found in the suspect’s possession. Such evidencestrongly links the crime scene and the suspect. Courtesy New Jersey State Police

Page 18: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 439

a suspect’s clothing a feasible investigative approach. Each item of cloth-ing should be placed in a separate airtight container, preferably a new,clean paint can.

Key Points

• Telltale signs of arson include evidence of separate and unconnectedfires, the use of “streamers” to spread the fire from one area to another,and evidence of severe burning found on the floor as opposed to theceiling of a structure.

• Other common signs of arson at a fire scene are the presence of accel-erants and the discovery of an ignition device.

• Porous materials, at the suspected point of origin of a fire should becollected and stored in airtight containers.

Analysis of Flammable ResiduesCriminalists are nearly unanimous in judging the gas chromatograph to bethe most sensitive and reliable instrument for detecting and characterizingflammable residues. Most arsons are initiated by petroleum distillates,such as gasoline and kerosene, that are composed of a complex mixture ofhydrocarbons. The gas chromatograph separates the hydrocarbon com-ponents of these liquids and produces a chromatographic pattern charac-teristic of a particular petroleum product.

The Headspace TechniqueBefore accelerant residues can be analyzed, they first must be recoveredfrom the debris collected at the scene. The easiest way to recover acceler-ant residues from fire-scene debris is to heat the airtight container inwhich the sample is sent to the laboratory. When the container is heated,any volatile residue in the debris is driven off and trapped in the container’senclosed airspace. The vapor or headspace is then removed with a syringe,as shown in Figure 12–12.

When the vapor is injected into the gas chromatograph, it is sepa-rated into its components, and each peak is recorded on the chro-matogram. The identity of the volatile residue is determined when thepattern of the resultant chromatogram is compared to patterns producedby known petroleum products. For example, in Figure 12–13, a gas chro-matographic analysis of debris recovered from a fire site shows a chro-matogram similar to a known gasoline standard, thus proving thepresence of gasoline.

In the absence of any recognizable pattern, the individual peaks can beidentified when the investigator compares their retention times to known hy-drocarbon standards (such as hexane, benzene, toluene, and xylenes). Thebrand name of a gasoline sample cannot currently by determined by gas chro-matography or any other technique. Fluctuating gasoline markets and ex-change agreements among the various oil companies preclude this possibility.

Vapor ConcentrationOne major disadvantage of the headspace technique is that the size of thesyringe limits the volume of vapor that can be removed from the containerand injected into the gas chromatograph. To overcome this deficiency,

hydrocarbonAny compound consisting of

only carbon and hydrogen.

Page 19: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

440 CHAPTER 12

FIGURE 12–12 Removal of vapor from an enclosed container for gaschromatographic analysis. Courtesy NewJersey State Police

many crime laboratories augment the headspace technique with amethod called vapor concentration. One setup for this analysis is shownin Figure 12–14.

A charcoal-coated strip, similar to that used in environmental moni-toring badges, is placed within the container holding the debris that hasbeen collected from the fire scene.2 The container is then heated to about60°C for about one hour. At this temperature, a significant quantity ofaccelerant vaporizes into the container airspace. The charcoal absorbs theaccelerant vapor with which it comes into contact. In this manner, over ashort period of time a significant quantity of the accelerant will be trappedand concentrated onto the charcoal strip.

Once the heating procedure is complete, the analyst removes the char-coal strip from the container and recovers the accelerant from the strip bywashing it with a small volume of solvent (carbon disulfide). The solvent isthen injected into the gas chromatograph for analysis. The major advan-tage of using vapor concentration with gas chromatography is its sensi-tivity. By absorbing the accelerant into a charcoal strip, the forensic analystcan increase the sensitivity of accelerant detection at least a hundredfoldover the conventional headspace technique.

An examination of Figure 12–13 shows that identifying an accelerantsuch as gasoline by gas chromatography is an exercise in pattern recogni-tion. Typically a forensic analyst compares the pattern generated by thesample to chromatograms from accelerant standards obtained under thesame conditions. The pattern of gasoline, as with many other accelerants,can easily be placed in a searchable library.

Gas Chromatography/Mass SpectrometryOn occasion, discernible patterns are not attainable by gas chromatography.This may be due to a combination of accelerants, or to the mixing ofaccelerant residue with heat-generated breakdown products of materialsburning at the fire scene. Under such conditions, a gas chromatographicpattern can be difficult if not impossible to interpret. In these cases, gaschromatography combined with mass spectrometry (discussed in Chapter 5)

Page 20: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 441

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Time (minutes)

FIGURE 12–13 (top) Gas chromatograph of vapor from a genuine gasoline sample.(bottom) Gas chromatograph of vapor from debris recovered at a fire site. Note thesimilarity of the known gasoline to vapor removed from the debris. Courtesy New JerseyState Police

has proven valuable for solving difficult problems in the detection ofaccelerant residues.

Complex chromatographic patterns can be simplified by passing theseparated components emerging from the gas chromatographic columnthrough a mass spectrometer. As each component enters the massspectrometer, it is fragmented into a collection of ions. The analyst canthen control which ions will be detected and which will go unnoticed. In

Page 21: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

442 CHAPTER 12

Lid

Charcoal-coated

stripHeating

mantle

Debris

FIGURE 12–14 Apparatus for accelerant recovery by vapor concentration. The vapor in theenclosed container is exposed to charcoal, a chemical absorbent, where it is trapped forlater analysis.

Known gasoline

GC

GC

GC

Unknown

Unknown

Gasoline

MS

(a)

(b)

(c)

FIGURE 12–15 Chromatogram of a residue sample collected at a fire scene (a) shows apattern somewhat like that of gasoline (b). However, a definitive conclusion that theunknown contained gasoline could be obtained only after extraneous peaks were eliminatedfrom the unknown by the use of GC/MS (c).

essence, the mass spectrometer acts as a filter allowing the analyst to seeonly the peaks associated with the ions selected for a particular accelerant.In this manner, the chromatographic pattern can be simplified by elimi-nating extraneous peaks that may obliterate the pattern.3 The process isillustrated in Figure 12–15.

Page 22: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 443

Key Points

• Most arsons are initiated by petroleum distillates such as gasoline andkerosene.

• The gas chromatograph is the most sensitive and reliable instrumentfor detecting and characterizing flammable residues. A gas chromato-graph separates the hydrocarbon components and produces a chro-matographic pattern characteristic of a particular petroleum product.

• By comparing select gas chromatographic peaks recovered from fire-scene debris to known flammable liquids, a forensic analyst may beable to identify the accelerant used to initiate the fire.

• Complex chromatographic patterns can be simplified by passing theseparated components emerging from the gas chromatographic col-umn through a mass spectrometer.

Chapter SummaryWhen a fire occurs, oxygen combines with a fuel to produce noticeablequantities of heat and light (flames). Three requirements must be satisfiedto initiate and sustain combustion: (1) a fuel must be present; (2) oxygenmust be available in sufficient quantity to combine with the fuel; and (3) suf-ficient heat must be applied to initiate the combustion and generated tosustain the reaction. A fuel achieves a reaction rate with oxygen sufficientto sustain a fire only when it is in the gaseous state.

As a fire progresses, the heat created by the combustion process tends tomove from a high-temperature region to one at a lower temperature. Heattransfer during a fire can occur in a number of ways. Conduction is move-ment of heat through an object caused by electrons and atoms collidingwithin the heated object. Radiation is the transfer of heat energy from aheated surface to a cooler surface by electromagnetic radiation. Convectionis the transfer of heat energy by movement of molecules within a liquid or gas.

The arson investigator must begin examining a fire scene for signsof arson as soon as the fire has been extinguished. Some telltale signs ofarson include evidence of separate and unconnected fires, the use of“streamers” to spread the fire from one area to another, and evidence of se-vere burning found on the floor as opposed to the ceiling of a structure.

The search of the fire scene must focus on finding the fire’s origin.There are no fast and simple rules for identifying a fire’s origin. Normallya fire tends to move upward, and thus the probable origin is most likelyclosest to the lowest point that shows the most intense characteristics ofburning. Sometimes as the fire burns upward, a V-shaped pattern formsagainst a vertical wall. At the suspect point of origin of a fire, porous ma-terials should be collected and stored in airtight containers.

In the laboratory, the gas chromatograph is the most sensitive andreliable instrument for detecting and characterizing flammable residues.Most arsons are initiated by petroleum distillates such as gasoline andkerosene. The gas chromatograph separates the hydrocarbon componentsand produces a chromatographic pattern characteristic of a particular pe-troleum product. By comparing select gas chromatographic peaks recov-ered from fire-scene debris to known flammable liquids, a forensic analystmay be able to identify the accelerant used to initiate the fire.

Page 23: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

444 CHAPTER 12

Review QuestionsFacts and Concepts

1. What is oxidation?

2. The quantity of heat from a chemical reaction comes from

a. the breaking and formation of chemical bonds.b. the presence of oxygen in the reaction.c. the emission of radiation.d. the composition of the fuel–air mix.

3. Molecules must absorb energy to ____________, and they liberate energywhen _____________.

4. What is combustion? Why is rusting not accompanied by combustion?

5. How does an exothermic reaction differ from an endothermic reaction?

6. A fire will burn until either of which two components is exhausted?

7. Name two factors that influence the speed of reaction of a fire.

8. In what physical state must a fuel exist in order to produce combustion whenit reacts with oxygen? Why must it be in this state?

9. How high must the temperature of a liquid fuel be before the fuel will burn?What is the term for the lowest temperature at which this occurs?

10. What is pyrolysis? How does pyrolysis produce fire?

11. How does the fuel–air mix affect combustion?

12. Define and give two examples of glowing combustion.

13. Define spontaneous combustion and give two examples of conditions underwhich it may occur.

14. What three requirements must be satisfied to initiate and sustain combustion?

15. As a fire progresses, toward what region does the heat created by combus-tion tend to move?

16. List and define the three mechanisms of heat transfer.

17. What is an insulator? Give an example of a good insulator.

18. List three common signs of arson at a fire scene.

19. Name three reasons why arson investigators must work quickly to collectevidence at a fire scene.

20. A search of the fire scene must focus on finding

a. traces of accelerant.b. ignition devices.c. human remains.d. the fire’s point of origin.

21. What are streamers? What does evidence of their presence at a fire scenesuggest?

22. Why should fire evidence be packaged in airtight containers?

23. What instrument do most criminalists consider the most sensitive and reliablefor detecting and characterizing flammable residues?

24. What is headspace? How is it recovered?

25. What is the main advantage of vapor concentration over the headspacetechnique?

Page 24: Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream · Debora Green—Poisoning the American Dream On the face of it, the Farrar family had it all. Dr. Debora Green, a nonpracticing oncologist,

Forensic Aspects of Fire Investigation 445

Application and Critical Thinking1. Indicate which method of heat transfer is most likely to be responsible for

each of the following:

a. ignition of papers in the room where a fire startsb. ignition of electrical wiring in a room adjoining the fire’s point or originc. ignition of roof timbersd. ignition of a neighboring house

2. It is late August in Houston, Texas, and you are investigating a fire that oc-curred at a facility that stores motor oils and other lubricating oils. A witnesspoints out a man who allegedly ran from the structure about the same timethat the fire started. You question the man, who turns out to be the owner ofthe facility. He tells you that he was checking his inventory when barrels ofwaste motor oil stored in an unventilated back room spontaneously burstinto flames. The owner claims that the fire spread so rapidly that he had toflee the building before he could call 911. After speaking with several em-ployees, you learn that the building has no air conditioning and that the oilhad been stored for almost a year in the cramped back room. You also learnfrom a detective assisting on the case that the owner increased his insurancecoverage on the facility within the past three months. Should you believe theowner’s story, or should you suspect arson? Upon what do you base yourconclusion?

3. Criminalist Mick Mickelson is collecting evidence from a fire scene. Hegathers about a quart of ash and soot debris collected from several roomssurrounding the point of origin. He stored the debris in a new, clean paintcan, filled about three-quarters full. Seeing several pieces of timber that hebelieves may contain accelerant residues, he cuts them and places them inairtight plastic bags. A short time later, a suspect is arrested and Micksearches him for any signs of an igniter or accelerants. He finds a cigarettelighter on the suspect and seizes it for evidence before turning the suspectover to the police. What mistakes, if any, did Mick make in collectingevidence?

Web ResourcesAn Introduction of Fire and Arson Evidence (Article outlining the basics of arsoninvestigation, collection and preservation of evidence, common myths about arson,and common mistakes made by arson investigators) www.jwharbert.com/arsonge20033.htm

Arson Investigation (Article about the process of arson investigation)www.crimeandclues.com/arson.htm

Is It an Accidental Fire or Arson?www.tcforensic.com.au/docs/article3.html

Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnelwww.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181584.pdf

Endnotes1. Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 (1978).2. R. T. Newman et al., “The Use of Activated Charcoal Strips for Fire Debris

Extractions by Passive Diffusion. Part 1: The Effects of Time, Temperature, StripSize, and Sample Concentration,” Journal of Forensic Sciences 41 (1996): 361.

3. M. W. Gilbert, “The Use of Individual Extracted Ion Profiles versus SummedExtracted Ion Profiles in Fire Debris Analysis,” Journal of Forensic Sciences 43(1998): 871.