Deadly Imbalance: Social vs Medical Value of Preventative Vaccines Donald P. Francis, MD, DSc Global...
-
Upload
wendy-parsons -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Deadly Imbalance: Social vs Medical Value of Preventative Vaccines Donald P. Francis, MD, DSc Global...
Deadly Imbalance: Deadly Imbalance: Social vs Medical Social vs Medical
Value of Preventative Value of Preventative VaccinesVaccines
Donald P. Francis, MD, DScDonald P. Francis, MD, DSc
Global Solutions for Infectious DiseasesGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases
Brisbane, CA, USABrisbane, CA, USA
Public Health GoalPublic Health Goal
Decrease or eliminate diseaseDecrease or eliminate disease
Public Health GoalPublic Health Goal
Decrease or eliminate diseaseDecrease or eliminate disease
……....in the shortest time in the shortest time possiblepossible
OutlineOutline1.1. Delayed disease control - Delayed disease control -
examplesexamples
2.2. Why? Lack of social valueWhy? Lack of social value
3.3. Roles of industry and public Roles of industry and public healthhealth
4.4. Costs of vaccine Costs of vaccine developmentdevelopment
5.5. Costs of delayed vaccine Costs of delayed vaccine useuse
6.6. Positive changes: “push” Positive changes: “push” and “pull”and “pull”
0
Mor
talit
y ra
te p
er 1
00,0
00/y
ear
DiptheriaPertussisMeaslesPoliomyelitisAIDS
Year1900 1920 1940 1960 1980
10
20
30
40
Infectious Disease Mortality Rates in the U.S.
SmallpoxSmallpox
Vaccinia (smallpox) Vaccine
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 19770
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Years
Num
ber
of c
ount
ries
(Smallpox and Its Eradication, WHO, 1998, pg517-38)
Number of Countries with Smallpox1967 - 1977
The Tragic DelayThe Tragic DelayVaccine CommerciallyVaccine Commercially Eradicated:Eradicated:
AvailableAvailable North Am/EuropeNorth Am/EuropeWorldwideWorldwide
SmallpoxSmallpox ~1900 ~1900 1930-1953 1930-1953 1967-771967-77
DelayDelay 30 to 53 years30 to 53 years 67-77 years 67-77 years
PolioPolio
Iron Iron LungsLungs
Rancho Rancho Los Los
Amigos, Amigos, CACA
PresidePresident nt
FrankliFranklin n
RooseveRooseveltlt
(1882-(1882-1945)1945)
Polio at Polio at age 39age 39
cccc
cccc
PolioBihar, India 2005
cccc
cccc
Dr. Jonas Salk
Vaccine licensed in 1955
cccc
cccc
NID – National Immunization Day
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Monthly incidence of polio in IndiaJanuary 1998 – December 2005*
2004
SNID – Sub-National Immunization Day Large scale mop-up
2005
Number of cases
NID NID NID NID NID NIDSNID SNID SNID SNID SNID NID Mop-upNIDSNID NID SNIDSNID SNID
* data as on 3rd March, 2006
The Tragic DelayThe Tragic DelayVaccine CommerciallyVaccine Commercially
Eradicated:Eradicated:AvailableAvailable North Am/EuropeNorth Am/Europe
WorldwideWorldwide
SmallpoxSmallpox ~1900 ~1900 1930-1953 1930-1953 1967-771967-77
DelayDelay 30 to 53 years30 to 53 years 67-77 years 67-77 years
PolioPolio 19551955 1991 1991>2005>2005
DelayDelay 36 years 36 years >50 >50 yearsyears
Hepatitis BHepatitis B
Hepatitis B - Clinical Features
Hepatitis B - Clinical Features
• Incubation period: Average 60-90 daysRange 45-180 days
• Clinical illness (jaundice): <5 yrs, <10%5 yrs, 30%-50%
• Acute case-fatality rate: 0.5%-1%
• Chronic infection: <5 yrs, 30%-90%5 yrs, 2%-10%
• Premature mortality fromchronic liver disease: 15%-25%
Vaccinelicensed
HBsAg screening
of pregnant women
recommended
Infantimmunizationrecommended
OSHA Ruleenacted
Adolescent immunization recommended
*Decline among
homosexual men & HCWs
Decline among
injectingdrug users
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
Year
Ca
ses
per
10
0,0
00 P
op
ula
tio
n
* Provisional date
Estimated Cases of Hepatitis B1978 – 1995
USA
Why?Why?
Social Value Drives Social Value Drives Vaccine Development Vaccine Development
and Applicationand Application
Scientific DiscoveryScientific Discovery
Vaccine DevelopmentVaccine DevelopmentSocial ValueSocial Value
Vaccine ApplicationVaccine Application
Expertise to Expertise to Develop VaccinesDevelop Vaccines
• Public/university institutes Public/university institutes • Private pharmaceutical Private pharmaceutical companiescompanies
Academic Academic ResearchResearch versus Pharmaceutical versus Pharmaceutical
DevelopmentDevelopment““The public sector institutions involved in vaccine The public sector institutions involved in vaccine R&D are primarily focused on basic science R&D are primarily focused on basic science knowledge diffusion, rather than single-mindedly knowledge diffusion, rather than single-mindedly solving applied development problems to ensure solving applied development problems to ensure large scale, consistent production. The incentives large scale, consistent production. The incentives in the public sector reinforce this knowledge focus in the public sector reinforce this knowledge focus and are generally inconsistent with efficient and are generally inconsistent with efficient production of commodities.“production of commodities.“
McKinsey & Company. Preliminary Report. How can McKinsey & Company. Preliminary Report. How can public-private partnerships accelerate the availability of public-private partnerships accelerate the availability of vaccines for the developing world? July 2001. World vaccines for the developing world? July 2001. World BankBank
Output Output Measurements of Measurements of
Each PlayerEach Player
PlayerPlayer Output Output MeasurementMeasurement
Public InstitutesPublic Institutes Knowledge/ManuscriptsKnowledge/Manuscripts
Private CompaniesPrivate Companies Products and Products and ProfitsProfits
Social Value Drives Social Value Drives Vaccine Development Vaccine Development
and Applicationand Application
Scientific DiscoveryScientific Discovery
Vaccine DevelopmentVaccine DevelopmentSocial ValueSocial Value
Vaccine ApplicationVaccine Application
Low Value Given to Low Value Given to
Vaccines:Vaccines:
• By vaccine industry - who makes By vaccine industry - who makes vaccinesvaccines• By public health (society) - who By public health (society) - who uses vaccinesuses vaccines
Public Health’s Role in Public Health’s Role in Discouraging Vaccine Discouraging Vaccine
DevelopmentDevelopment
• Recognize value, but unwilling to pay Recognize value, but unwilling to pay for vaccinesfor vaccines• Little or no urgency to deliver new Little or no urgency to deliver new vaccinesvaccines
The global vaccine market
Developing countriesIndustrialized countries
Population
Disease Burden
Vaccine market
18%82%
93%
85%
T=$6 Billion/y
15%
7%
Vaccine R&D
T= $500 Million/y90% 10%
Pricing in Low vs. High Pricing in Low vs. High Income CountriesIncome Countries
Primary Disease compared to
vaccineMeasles
Diptheria, Pertussis, Tetanus
TB HepatitisBHaemo
philious BPolio
Low Income Countries
Measlesmomoin
combo with DTp
Middle Income Countries
MMRwholecell in combo
BCGin combo
with DTPwin combo
with DTPwOPV
High Income Countries
14c
$15.50
7c
$10.65
10c
$8.25
7c 32-90c
$9.00
$3.10
$21.38
Cape Town, RSA April 11, 2002
““Low or uncertain demand for new vaccines in Low or uncertain demand for new vaccines in developing countries, together with the low developing countries, together with the low prices negotiated over the years for the prices negotiated over the years for the traditional six vaccines (DPT, polio, measles traditional six vaccines (DPT, polio, measles and BCG) for use in developing countries, and BCG) for use in developing countries, have deterred vaccine manufacturers from have deterred vaccine manufacturers from developing vaccines for use almost exclusively developing vaccines for use almost exclusively in what are perceived to be “low profit” in what are perceived to be “low profit” countries.” countries.”
(WHO, State of the World’s Vaccines and (WHO, State of the World’s Vaccines and Immunization, 2002)Immunization, 2002)
Vaccine development is Vaccine development is expensive.expensive.
Vaccine Development CostsVaccine Development CostsLicensed Product: Flumist Licensed Product: Flumist
ExampleExample
InvestmentInvestment
1996 – 20021996 – 2002 Research & DevResearch & Dev$145mm$145mm
2003 – 20042003 – 2004 Manufacture and LicenseManufacture and License$200mm$200mm
Source: H. Greenberg (2004)Source: H. Greenberg (2004)
Investment Investment Required to Required to Develop One Develop One
VaccineVaccine
Money: Money: $200 to $200 to $500mm$500mm
Time:Time: 12 to 15 years12 to 15 years
Why Vaccines Fail to Why Vaccines Fail to CompeteCompeteVaccine/Therapeutic Market ComparisonVaccine/Therapeutic Market Comparison
Lipitor = atorvastatin calciumPrilosec = omepraxole
Source: Piers Whitehead: Vaccine market data 2000, pharma sales 2001
Costly ResultCostly Result
Lack of social valueLack of social value
Lack of political (government) Lack of political (government) leadershipleadership
CostlyCostly
Costs of Vaccine Costs of Vaccine DelayDelay
• Continued disease occurrenceContinued disease occurrence
Costs of Vaccine Costs of Vaccine DelayDelay
• Continued disease occurrenceContinued disease occurrence• Increased infected pool – more Increased infected pool – more difficult to difficult to controlcontrol
Costs of Vaccine Costs of Vaccine DelayDelay
• Continued disease occurrenceContinued disease occurrence• Increased infected pool – more Increased infected pool – more difficult to controldifficult to control
• Small market further reduces Small market further reduces incentives for incentives for industry to make industry to make vaccines –> more delayvaccines –> more delay
Adjusting market forces.Adjusting market forces.
Altering the Altering the Market FailureMarket Failure
• PushPush• PullPull
Push: Public Push: Public Private Private
Partnerships in the Partnerships in the PastPast
Pasteur InstitutePasteur Institute
diphtheria, TB, pertussis, diphtheria, TB, pertussis, tetanustetanus
Rockefeller FoundationRockefeller Foundation
yellow feveryellow fever
March of Dimes FoundationMarch of Dimes Foundation
poliopolio
Push: Recent Public-Push: Recent Public-Private Partnerships Private Partnerships
for Vaccinesfor VaccinesAeras Global Tuberculosis Vaccine Foundation Aeras Global Tuberculosis Vaccine Foundation (Aeras)(Aeras)European Malaria Vaccine Initiative (EMVI)European Malaria Vaccine Initiative (EMVI)Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases (GSID)Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases (GSID)Human Hookworm Vaccine Initiative (HHVI)Human Hookworm Vaccine Initiative (HHVI)International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI)International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI)Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI)Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI)Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative (PDVI)Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative (PDVI)Pneumococcal Vaccine ADIPPneumococcal Vaccine ADIPRotavirus Vaccine ADIPRotavirus Vaccine ADIPSouth African AIDS Vaccine Initiative (SAVI)South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative (SAVI)
Pull:Pull: Vaccine Purchase Vaccine Purchase FundsFunds
• State and National State and National GovernmentsGovernments• International OrganizationsInternational Organizations
Summary: Adverse Summary: Adverse FactorsFactors
Vaccine development, like other pharmaceutical Vaccine development, like other pharmaceutical development, is costly ranging from $200 to $500 development, is costly ranging from $200 to $500 million per vaccine;million per vaccine;
Vaccine development is slow taking 12 to 15 years;Vaccine development is slow taking 12 to 15 years;The skills necessary to develop vaccines rest The skills necessary to develop vaccines rest
primarily within the private sector;primarily within the private sector;For the same cost and effort, pharmaceutical For the same cost and effort, pharmaceutical
companies can develop therapeutic drugs that companies can develop therapeutic drugs that are far more profitable;are far more profitable;
Public health leaders are cheap and unwilling to pay Public health leaders are cheap and unwilling to pay reasonable prices for valuable vaccines;reasonable prices for valuable vaccines;
The lack of social value given to vaccines makes them The lack of social value given to vaccines makes them unattractive products for the pharmaceutical unattractive products for the pharmaceutical industry to develop;industry to develop;
Vaccines, once developed, are often applied very Vaccines, once developed, are often applied very slowly;slowly;
Summary: Positive Summary: Positive ChangesChanges
Public-private vaccine development Public-private vaccine development partnerships, having pharmaceutical partnerships, having pharmaceutical development expertise, are being development expertise, are being established;established;
Funding is being provided, most notably by Funding is being provided, most notably by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
Foundation support is driving public health Foundation support is driving public health authorities to deliver existing vaccines;authorities to deliver existing vaccines;