Deactivation modes of DOCs

18
Rama Krishna Dadi Krishna Gunugunuri, Hongmei An, Anand Srinivasan, Rohil Daya, Yuhui Zha, Saurabh Joshi, Michael Cunningham, Krishna Kamasamudram Deactivation modes of DOCs

Transcript of Deactivation modes of DOCs

Page 1: Deactivation modes of DOCs

Rama Krishna Dadi

Krishna Gunugunuri, Hongmei An, Anand Srinivasan, Rohil

Daya, Yuhui Zha, Saurabh Joshi, Michael Cunningham, Krishna

Kamasamudram

Deactivation modes of DOCs

Page 2: Deactivation modes of DOCs

2

Introduction

▪ Precious metals like Pt and Pd are typically used in DOCs due to their superioroxidation capability

▪ Thermal aging and chemical aging of DOCs can result in their loss of oxidationperformance due to change in particle size and morphology of PGM particles

▪ Chemical aging of DOC is caused by inorganic elements present in diesel fuel andengine oil

▪ The deactivation due to S is recoverable with a thermal regeneration of DOC. Pdeactivation is irreversible under typical thermal regeneration events done indiesel after treatment system

▪ The objective of this work is to give general perspective on physical processesleading to different deactivation modes of DOCs

Page 3: Deactivation modes of DOCs

3

Outline of aging models

▪ Sintering type of models for PGM can be used to capture impact of HTA onoxidation performance

▪ Heat transfer model involving reaction heat source can capture solid temperatureexotherm inside DOC

▪ SOx poisoning models including SOx storage, SO2 oxidation and the impact onoxidation performance model can be used to capture impact of S on DOCperformance

▪ PGM oxidation rate is dependent on particle size, presence of S, and Pt: Pd ratio▪ P poisoning can be captured by two different sub-models. One for P accumulation

with engine operation, other for impact of P loading on oxidation performance

Page 4: Deactivation modes of DOCs

4

Hydrothermal Aging

Page 5: Deactivation modes of DOCs

5

HTA impact on Oxidation Performance

1. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 283 (2021) 119655

𝑑Ψ

𝑑𝑡= −𝑘𝑑 Ψ−Ψ∞

𝑛; Ψ∞ = 𝐴∞ exp −𝐸∞

𝑅𝑔𝑇𝑎𝑔𝑒

▪ Limiting process for Aging changes withextreme HTA

▪ Aging model with two sets of parameterswere developed: one for mild aging and theother extreme aging [1]

NO=200ppm

O2 =10%

Page 6: Deactivation modes of DOCs

6

HTA impact on PGM oxidation

▪ PGM Oxidation → Time on stream deactivation▪ Higher Pd → Lower PGM oxidation rate▪ Larger PGM particles→ Lower PGM oxidation rate [1]

1. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 283 (2021) 119655

NO=1000ppm+O2=10%

NO=1000ppm+O2=10%

Higher Pd contentHigher Pt content

550°C-4h 550°C-4h700°C-50h

NO=1000ppm; O2 =10%

Page 7: Deactivation modes of DOCs

7

DOC solid temperature exotherm

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

time(s)

0

100

200

300

400

500

Inle

t Te

mp

era

ture

(°C

)

0

100

200

300

400

500

Exh

au

st fl

ow

(g/s

)

▪ In cylinder HC dosing to generate exotherm▪ Multiple thermocouples instrumented▪ Key heat transfer phenomena to be modeled

• Exotherm generation by HC oxidation• Radial heat loss• Axial heat convection

Page 8: Deactivation modes of DOCs

8

DOC Bed temperature exothermicity

▪ Model predicted solid temperature histogram is more appropriate to understandthe extent of thermal aging of PGM based catalysts

▪ Thermal gradients become particularly important for zone coated formulations

Data Model

Page 9: Deactivation modes of DOCs

9

Chemical Aging (S, P)

Page 10: Deactivation modes of DOCs

10

TPO on sulfated DOC

▪ TPO on catalyst saturated with S▪ Bimodal profile: Surface sulfates and bulk sulfates▪ Pt role: Migration of sulfur to support, oxidation of low oxidation states of S [2]

2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 181 (2016) 587–598

Data Model

Page 11: Deactivation modes of DOCs

11

Impact of SOx on oxidation performance

.

3. Catalysis Science & Technology, 5(3), pp.1731-1740

▪ Oxidation performance gets inhibited by S▪ Performance recovery dependent on DeSOx temperature and time▪ Facile PGM particles → More prone to S poisoning [3]▪ Model: S impact on oxidation

I. Surface S coverage (Slide. 10)II. Performance as a function of coverage

NO=1000ppm; O2 =10%

Page 12: Deactivation modes of DOCs

12

Impact of S on PGM oxidation

4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800

time(s)

15

20

25

30

35

40N

O C

on

vers

ion

(%)

550°C-4h:Without S

Sulfated Catalyst

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

time(s)

0

20

40

60

80

100

NO

Co

nv

ers

ion

(%)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Cat

in T

em

pera

ture

(°C

)

Model

Data

Temperature = 250°C

4. Catalysis Today 258 (2015) 169–174

▪ S on catalyst protects PGM from getting oxidized [4]▪ Sulfated catalyst with reductants in the feed → Significantly suppressed PGM oxidation

Page 13: Deactivation modes of DOCs

13

Real World Aged DOCs – NO oxidation

▪ Impact of P on Oxidation – Reactor and Elemental characterization of RWA DOCs▪ Oxidation performance before and after acid washing▪ Acid washing → Removes irreversible chemical contaminants▪ ICP analysis before and after acid washing▪ Activity recovered showed good trend with irreversible P but not S

NO=1000ppm; O2 =10%

5. SAE 2005-01-1758

Page 14: Deactivation modes of DOCs

14

HC Oxidation

▪ Same experimental tests as NO oxidation▪ Aging model framework is same as NO oxidation

▪ Aging parameters can be different

P removed (g/l)

Page 15: Deactivation modes of DOCs

15

Conclusions

▪ Real world aged DOCs can be represented by hydro-thermal aging, regardless ofactual dominant mode of deactivation

▪ Irreversible S present on catalyst suppresses deactivation due to PGM oxidesformation

▪ Deactivation of catalysts showed clear trend with P loading on catalyst surface

▪ Mimicking real world P loading of catalyst is important to simulate field deactivationdue to P

Page 16: Deactivation modes of DOCs

16

Acknowledgements (Advanced Chemical

System Integration team at Cummins)

Page 17: Deactivation modes of DOCs

17

Q+A

Page 18: Deactivation modes of DOCs

1818