Dcdc Complaint All 20091221

8/14/2019 Dcdc Complaint All 20091221

1/46

OAO 240 (Rev. 10/03)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of COLUMBIA

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

Plaintiff WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF

V.FEES AND AFFIDAVIT

CASE NUMBER:

Defendant

I, declare that I am the (check appropriate box)

Gpetitioner/plaintiff/movant G other

in the above-entitled proceeding; that in support of my request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs

under 28 USC 1915 I declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and that I am entitled to th

relief sought in the complaint/petition/motion.

In support of this application, I answer the following questions under penalty of perjury:

1. Are you currently incarcerated? G Yes G No (If No, go to Part 2)

If Yes, state the place of your incarceration

Are you employed at the institution? Do you receive any payment from the institution?

Attach a ledger sheet from the institution(s) of your incarceration showing at least the past six months

transactions.

2. Are you currently employed? G Yes G No

a. If the answer is Yes, state the amount of your take-home salary or wages and pay period and give th

name and address of your employer. (List both gross and net salary.)

b. If the answer is No, state the date of your last employment, the amount of your take-home salary or wage

and pay period and the name and address of your last employer.

3. In the past 12 twelve months have you received any money from any of the following sources?

a. Business, profession or other self-employment G Yes G No

b. Rent payments, interest or dividends G Yes G No

c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments G Yes G No

d. Disability or workers compensation payments G Yes G No

e. Gifts or inheritances G Yes G No

f. Any other sources G Yes G No

If the answer to any of the above is Yes, describe, on the following page, each source of money and state th

amount received and what you expect you will continue to receive.

USDCDC 1 OF 46

UNITED STATES

ICTOR DEL RIO

427 PINPOINT DR

PRING, TX 77373

H 281-216-5624

MAIL [email protected]

S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

S ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER

50 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

ashington DC 20530-0001

H 202-514-2000


VICTOR DEL RIO

WAL-MART, 155 Louetta Crossing, Spring, TX 77373; $7.50 PER HOUR - variable

V.

PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANT

EX PARTE


2/46

AO 240 Reverse (Rev. 10/03)

4. Do you have any cash or checking or savings accounts? G Yes G No

If Yes, state the total amount.

5. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any other

thing of value? G Yes G No

If Yes, describe the property and state its value.

6. List the persons who are dependent on you for support, state your relationship to each person and indicate

how much you contribute to their support. (If children are dependents, please refer to them by their initials)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct.

Date Signature of Applicant

NOTICE TO PRISONER: A Prisoner seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees shall submit an affidav

stating all assets. In addition, a prisoner must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional office

showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you hav

multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of eac

account.

USDCDC 2 OF 46

1996 FORD RANGER P/U, 146K MILES, $700 APPROX

NICHOLAS DEL RIO, SON, 710.00 PER MONTH, PER UNFINALIZED VOID ORDERS NO. 2000-27121

DEC 21, 2009

IFP permission granted in 98% of cases: (most recent) US Supreme Court Case No. 09-6398,

Tx Supreme Court Case No.s 08-0896 & 09-0702, US Federal Claims Case No. 09-130C


3/46

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DO NOT WRITE ON SAMPLE FORM

YOUR NAME

YOUR ADDRESS

CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE

YOUR TELEPHONE NO.

VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. (To be filled in by Clerk)

DEFENDANT(S) NAME(S)THEIR ADDRESS


COMPLAINT

DO NOT WRITE ON SAMPLE FORM

SET FORTH THE FACTS OF YOUR CASE.

ON THE LAST PAGE OF YOUR COMPLAINT, SPELL OUT THE RELIEF YOU AREREQUESTING FROM THIS COURT.

IF YOU ARE ASKING FOR A TRIAL BY JURY, YOU MUST STATE THIS IN YOUR

COMPLAINT.

IF YOU ARE REQUESTING A SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF MONEY, STATE THIS IN YOUR

COMPLAINT.

ORIGINAL SIGNATURE (IN PEN)

YOUR NAME

YOUR ADDRESS


USDCDC 3 OF 46

VICTOR DEL RIO

2427 PINPOINT DR

SPRING, TX 77373

PH 281-216-5624

EMAIL [email protected]

US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER


Washington DC 20530-0001

PH 202-514-2000


_______________________________

VICTOR DEL RIO

2427 PINPOINT DRIVE

SPRING, TX 77373

42 USC 2000d-7; 28 USC 2403;

42 USC 1983; 42 USC 421;

28 USC 2254; 18 USC 241 & 242;18 USC 1512 & 1513;

Bivens 403 U.S. 388;

Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908),

Monell, 436 U.S. 658 (1978);

Civil Rights Act of 1871 & 1964;

FALSE CLAIMS, & 4th & 9th Amendments

EX PARTE

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 520 (1971) Supreme Court found that pro se pleadings

should be held to "less stringent standards" than those drafted by attorneys.

THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS:

Tracey Del Rio, Lois Hill,

Spring ISD Special Services,Denise Drexler, Doug Warne,

Baylor College of Medicine,

Texas Children's Hospital,

Cole Speech & Language Center,

City of Houston, Juana Del Rio,

Maggie Del Rio, Josefina Del Rio,

2431 Pinpoint Drive Spring TX 77373,

Depelchin Family Center,

David Khaleq, Dollar General on

Rayford-Sawdust Rd,

Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations,

Ray & Myrna Gregory, Elizabeth Pagel,

(more to be added soon)

PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANT


4/46

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

JURISDICTION and VENUE are proper pursuant to:

01. Public Law 96-170 Dec 29 1979.

02. Article I, II, & III of the D.C. Constitution and under the 14th Amendment Section 3.

03. 31 USC 3732 (False claims jurisdiction)

04. 42 USC 2000c8 (Personal suits for relief against discrimination in public education)

05. 42 USC 2000a6 (Jurisdiction; exhaustion of other remedies; exclusiveness of remedies; assertion of

rights based on other Federal or State laws and pursuit of remedies for enforcement of such rights)

06. 28 USC 1367 (Supplemental jurisdiction)

07. 28 USC 1631(Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction)

08. 28 USC 1402 (United States as defendant)

09. 28 USC 2679 (Exclusiveness of remedy)

10. D.C. CODE 16-1901(b) Petition; issuance of writ.

11. D.C. CODE 11-501. Civil jurisdiction. In addition to its jurisdiction as a United States district court

and any other jurisdiction conferred on it by law, the United States District Court for the District of

Columbia has ju risdiction of the following:

(1) Any civil action or other matter begun in the court before the effective date of the District of

Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 other than any matter over which the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia takes jurisdiction under section 11-921(a)(4)(G) or 11-921(a)(5)(B).

(4) Any civil action (other than a matter over which the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

has jurisdiction under paragraph (3) or (4) of section 11-921(a)) begun in the court during the thirty-

month period beginning on such effective date wherein the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000.

12. 5th Amendment of US Constitution: No person be deprived of life, liberty, or p roperty, without due

process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

13. 9th Amendment of US Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be

construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Ref Quo Warranto

14.Article IV, Section IV: The Guarantee Clause

15. Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 USC Sec 1983)

USDCDC 4 OF 46


5/46

16. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") Section 204

All of which gives the HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JURISDICTION over SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION and PERSONAL JURISDICTION to

hear PETITIONER'S CLAIMS.

COMPLAINT

17.

Now Comes PETITIONER, VICTOR DEL RIO, on behalf of SON and himself, both long term victims of

State and Federal Crimes (since 1996), suffering irreparable damages, retaliation (Title II and ADA 504

discrimination), denials and deprivations of their Civil Rights, and loss of life-liberty-property, as

Naturalist Citizens of the United States of America, who have not rescinded their Citizenship to their

Country. Their Urgent Pleading for Redress for Grievances comes in the form o f this COMPLAINT for

damages and violations started in 1996 by TRACEY DEL RIO:

01) In 1996, SON unknowingly inflicted with brain damages,

02) In March 1998, SON suspected to be Autistic,

03) In July 2000, SON unknowingly intentional ly near-drowned to ca use brain seizures,

04) In August 2000, SON now confirmed to be Autistic,

05) Since July 2000

a. resultant brain damages and seizures remain undisclosed or

falsely diagnosed as symptomatic to Autism until PETITIONER'S discovery in early 2008

b. Parents divorced, standard custody until January 2006, then every other week custody,

c. School district (Spring Independent School District) denies IDEA 2004 compliant F.A.P.E.

06) In mid 2007, Due Process against SISD is permitted but completely biased and prejudiced for SISD

07) In July through February 2007, PETITIONER is repeatedly burglarized,

08). In August 2007, PETITIONER is wrongly terminated,

09) From September through December 2007, PETITIONER home schools SON with amazing results and

aptitude NOT attributed to SON by ANYONE before-during-after this time.

10) In December 2007, PETITIONER requests another Due Process and files in local District Court for

Public Funding of Private Education

USDCDC 5 OF 46


6/46

11) On December 16th, TRACEY DEL RIO denies SON and PETITIONER almost all conta ct until March

in order to prevent further HEARINGS which SON and PETITIONER had both decided to end to focus

on their new family business (comic book publishing) combined, home schooling, and pursuing their

mutual dream.

12) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated DISCRIMINATION (retaliation)

from Family Court 311 and every other Court,

13) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated Federal Torts,

14) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated NO LEGAL REMEDY

in almost all Courts inc. Texas Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, local Courts,

etc...

15) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON et al have learned ongoing DENIAL of IDEA

2004 Compliant F.A.P.E. and how to HANDLE and REMOVE PETITIONER are according to a

classified 'protocol' in the hands of SISD, their legal counsel Bracewell & Giuliani and Thompson &

Horton, and the Texas Attorney General.

16) PETITIONER and SON, without any legal counsel, have been and are still facing immense legal

complexities:

a. Family Court issues custody, child abuse, void orders, denial of Due Process,

b. Federal and State court issues FALSE CLAIMS, F.T.C.A., Civil rights,

Constitutional damages, Torts, State Action Requirement, duo jurisdictions, et c...

EXPEDITED AND MANDATORY RELIEF REQUESTED

18.Expedited Writ of Habeas Corpus (or Writ of Right) for return of SON suffering brain

damages-brain seizures-history of developmental delays caused by TRACEY DEL RIO, who

accelerated her abuse since December 16th, 2007.

a. DC ST 1981 16-1901 (Petition; issuance of writ),

b. Rules Governing Domestic Relations Proceedings (SCR-Dom. Rel.) Rule 64,

c. Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(1) & (d)(3)

d. UCCJEA

19. Permission for PETITIONER to testify via Teleconference, Internet, Video, or locally to

USDCDC 6 OF 46


7/46

MAGISTRATE, to arrange # 01

20. Court appointed legal counsel pursuant to:

a. Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5)

b. Intervention by United States or a State, 28 USC 2403

c. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24

d. US Constitution 6th Amendment (effective counsel)

21. Emergency local special sessions pursuant to DC ST 11 -911 (Emergency authority to conduct

proceedings outside District of Columbia) in a local Court since PETITIONER'S are residents of

Texas and bankrupted, denied gainful employment, denied their rightful share to proceedings

against former employer, (Pugh v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., No. 4:07-CV-2869),

denied approx. 8 months of unemployment insurance by former employer, both forced to reside with

DEFENDANTS (CO-CONSPIRATORS) aggravating their damages by:

a. restricting their access to 'legal remedies' (by phone, internet, mail, etc...),

b. conspiring to interfere with civil rights (42 USC 1985) by

1. false allegations of PETITIONER being INSANE, BRAIN DAMAGED,UNFIT,

2. involvement in attempts for PETITIONER'S ENTRAPMENT and IMPRISONMENT,

22.Expedited Motion to Vacate & Evidentiary Hearings on Unfinalized,Void Orders, No. 2000-

27121, from 2008 Custody Hearings which disregarded ALL TESTIMONY and RIGHTS of

PETIONER and SON. Temporary Orders should replace TRACEY DEL RIO with VICTOR DEL

RIO and vice versa;

PETITIONER has not been permitted any conta ct or custody of SON, going on 1.5 years, to:

a. prevent prosecution and legal remedy of DEFENDANTS,

b. help create evidence of 'conduct' to use against PETITIONER,

c. rid themselves of PETITIONER by causing his death, debilitation, imprisonment or

civil commitment without Substantive Due Process, or 'surrender'

23. Proceed over (2) FTCA Forms submitted to US DOJ in mid-May 2009 without reply to date,

total $4 million

24. DEFENDANT's immediate cease and desist of tortious interference by or denials of legal duties owed to

USDCDC 7 OF 46


8/46

SON and PETITIONER by:

GREGORY ABBOTT - TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL - [email protected]

ERIC HOLDER - U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL D.C. - [email protected]

as it pertains to F.T.C.A.,

TIM JOHNSON - U.S. ATTORNEY OF HARRIS COUNTY - [email protected]

THOMAS PEREZ U.S. ASSIST ATTORNEY GENERAL D.C. - [email protected]

as it pertains to Enforcement and Intervention per US AM Chap 8,

RICHARD POWERS F.B.I. SAIC OF HARRIS COUNTY - [email protected]

as it pertains to 24x7 illegal surveillance of PETITIONER, Bivens Claims for Constitutional

damages, Investigations per US AM Chap 8,

25. Damages currently total $4 million; however, PETITIONER is very willing to negotiate for the sake of

everyone's best interest his SON, himself, home state, and country.

26. Return of stolen and forfeited property,

27. Any and All Other Relief and Remedy necessary not requested as necessary, such as:

a. Termination of Parental Rights for Tracey Del Rio

b. Title II and ADA 504 discrimination for SON & PETITIONER

c. Denial of IDEA 2004 compliant F.A.P.E.

d. Malpractice, etc...

e. Credit history repair,

f. Witness protection relocation

28. Quo Warranto proceedings (if necessary)

NOTICE

29.

We, the People, reserve the Right to Amend this Petition at any time daring the Process of this action at

bar.

USDCDC 8 OF 46

9. WRIT OF MANDAMUS directed to FED. JUDGE

AVID HITTNER & JUDGE VANESSA GILMORE TO

XPEDITE HEARINGS ON CASE NO. H-09-1651 IN

OCAL FEDERAL COURT.

and available

30. Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, granting exped

Writ of Habeas Corpus for return of SON.

31. Pursuant to 18 USC 1513, Immediate cessa

of 'protocol' in effect to prevent legal remed

for PETITIONER and SON through TORTS, FALSE

ALLEGATIONS, FALSE ARREST, etc.. (PROJECT

PAPERCLIP; protocol is conspiracy to disable,

scapegoat, exhaust & exploit victim

under 'color of law') SEE PGS 14, 31, 34, 39,

& CD

32. PETITIONER is forced to reside with

DEFENDANTS (JUANA & MAGGIE DEL RIO), long

conspirators, helping to falsely portray

PETITIONER as ABUSIVE, VIOLENT, CRAZY, SE

FIEND, & UNFIT PARENT.

NOTE: PETITIONER REPEATEDLY MADE AWARE OF CONSPIRACY IN 2006 HAS BEEN PLANTING

EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM INVASION OF PRIVACY, CONSPIRACY, ACCUSATIONS OF BEING PARANOID

AND OR CRAZY,


9/46

PRAYER

30.

The District of Columbia not being a State and is not represented in Congress; its officials are not part of

this action as D.C. holds a neutral position. I, VICTOR DEL RIO, respectfully request our case to be heard,

directly or indirectly through Supervisory Control or Writ of Mandamus, pursuant to Constitutional and

statutory provisions.

SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________

DATED_______Dec 19, 2009________________________

Respectfully submitted,

VICTOR DEL RIO, 2427 PINPOINT DRIVE, SPRING, TX 77373,

Ph 281-216-5624, Fx 281-617-4218, del [email protected]

VERIFICATION

I, VICTOR DEL RIO, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United

States of America, without the United States (Federal government), that the above statement of facts and

laws is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, and the

attached documents are true and exact copies of the originals with exception to necessary redaction or

notation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

THIS PETITION is being mailed to the Clerk of the Honorable Court of the Superior Court of the District

of Columbia and the DEFENDANT'S on this day of _____________ and month of_____________ in the year

2009.

SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________

DATED_______Dec 19, 2009________________________

Respectfully submitted,

VICTOR DEL RIO, 2427 PINPOINT DRIVE, SPRING, TX 77373,

Ph 281-216-5624, Fx 281-617-4218, del [email protected]

USDCDC 9 OF 46

DISTRICT COURT OF THE

DEC 21, 2009

DEC 21, 2009


10/46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Application to Proceed IFP........................ ................. .............. ........................... .................................01

II. COMPLAINT.........................................................................................................................................03

A. JURISDICTION AND VENUE.................................................................................................04

B. COMPLAINT.............................................................................................................................05

C. EXPEDITED AND MANDATORY RELIEF REQUESTED...................................................06

D. NOTICE.....................................................................................................................................08

E. PRAYER....................................................................................................................................09

F. VERIFICATION........................................................................................................................09

III. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 01...........................................................................................................11

IV. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 02...........................................................................................................12

V. CERTIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT...............................................................................................13

APPENDIX 01VOID ORDERS NO. 2000-27121..................................................................................14

APPENDIX 02_ PREFERENCE OF CHILD...........................................................................................29

APPENDIX 03_ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF RELATED CIVIL CASES.....................................30

APPENDIX 04_ EMERGENCY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.............................................................32

APPENDIX 05_ PROOF OF RESTRAINT..............................................................................................34

APPENDIX 06_REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................35

APPENDIX 07_FTCA FORM 95 #1.........................................................................................................39

APPENDIX 08_FTCA FORM 95 #2.........................................................................................................41

APPENDIX 09_THREATENED IN FEDERAL COURT........................................................................45


11/46

USDCDC 11 OF 46

21st





H 202-514-2000



12/46

USDCDC 12 OF 46

21st

US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER


Washington DC 20530-0001

PH 202-514-2000



13/46

USDCDC 13 OF 46





H 202-514-2000


v.


14/46

U&VFO 1 of 15

U&VFO 1 of 15 USDCDC 14 OF 46


15/46

U&VFO 2 of 15



16/46

U&VFO 3 of 15



17/46

U&VFO 4 of 15



18/46

U&VFO 5 of 15



19/46

U&VFO 6 of 15



20/46

U&VFO 7 of 15



21/46

U&VFO 8 of 15



22/46

U&VFO 9 of 15



23/46

U&VFO 10 of 15



24/46

U&VFO 11 of 15



25/46

U&VFO 12 of 15



26/46

U&VFO 13 of 15



27/46

U&VFO 14 of 15



28/46

U&VFO 15 of 15



29/46

USDCDC 29 OF 46


30/46

CLERK=S OFFICE CO-932

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Rev. 4/96

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF RELATED CIVIL CASES PENDING

IN THIS OR ANY OTHER UNITED STATES COURT

Civil Action No. __________

(To be supplied by the Clerk)

NOTICE TO PARTIES:

Pursuant to Rule 40.5(b)(2), you are required to prepare and submit this form at the time of filing any civil action which i

related to any pending cases or which involves the same parties and relates to the same subject matter of any dismissed related cases.

This form must be prepared in sufficient quantity to provide one copy for the Clerk=s records, one copy for the Judge to whom the

cases is assigned and one copy for each defendant, so that you must prepare 3 copies for a one defendant case, 4 copies for a two

defendant case, etc.

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:

Rule 405(b)(2) of this Court requires that you serve upon the plaintiff and file with your first responsive pleading or motion

any objection you have to the related case designation.

NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL

Rule 405(b)(3) of this Court requires that as soon as an attorney for a party becomes aware of the existence of a related case

or cases, such attorney shall immediately notify, in writing, the Judges on whose calendars the cases appear and shall serve such notice

on counsel for all other parties.

_______________

The plaintiff , defendant or counsel must complete the following:

I. RELATIONSHIP OF NEW CASE TO PENDING RELATED CASE(S).

A new case is deemed related to a case pending in this or another U.S. Court if the new case: [Check appropriate box(e=s

below.]

[ ] (a) relates to common property

[ ] (b) involves common issues of fact

[ ] (c) grows out of the same event or transaction

[ ] (d) involves the validity or infringement of the same patent

[ ] (e) is filed by the same pro se litigant

2. RELATIONSHIP OF NEW CASE TO DISMISSED RELATED CASE(ES)

A new case is deemed related to a case dismissed, with or without prejudice, in this or any other U.S. Court, if the new case

involves the same parties and same subject matter.

Check box if new case is related to a dismissed case: [ ]

3. NAME THE UNITED STATES COURT IN WHICH THE RELATED CASE IS FILED (IF OTHER THAN THIS

COURT):

________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. CAPTION AND CASE NUMBER OF RELATED CASE(E=S). IF MORE ROOM IS NEED PLEASE USE OTHER SIDE.

____________________________________ v. ____________________________ C.A. No._________

_________________________ _______________________________________________

DATE Signature of Plaintiff /Defendant (or counsel) CO-392 1 OF 2USDCDC 30 OF 46

DEC 21, 2009

SEE NEXT PAGE

SEE NEXT PAGE

PAGE 30


31/46

CO-392 2 OF 2USDCDC 31 OF 46

FAMILY COURT 311TH01. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-02476 (DISMISSED)02. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-03143 (DISMISSED)03. TRACEY DEL RIO V. VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 2000-27121 (CONTESTED)

APPEALS - STATE04. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF05. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DOUG WARNE INDIVIDUALLY ...,NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF

06. VICTOR DEL RIO V. ELIZABETH PAGEL, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF07. In re VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF

CIVIL COURT07. N. DEL RIO, bnf VICTOR DEL RIO V. SPRING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

NO. H073937, UNHEARD, TRACEY DEL RIO INTERFERED WITH WITNESS08. USA V. CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY & TEXAS, NO. 2009-17355, DENIED ALLRELIEF-DECLARED VEXATIOUS LITIGANT-PENDING MOREHEARINGS IN 2010.Hon. Judge Randy Wilson, Court Phone: (713) 368-623009. UNKNOWN, FALSE CHARGES OF HIRING HOOKER HANDLED BY EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)10. UNKNOWN, FALSELY CHARGED WITH THEFT BY ANOTHER EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)

FEDERAL COURT10. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DENISE DREXLER & TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076,DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

11. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076, WANT OF JURISDICTION12. VICTOR DEL RIO V. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NO. H-09-1651, HEARINGS IN MARCH2010, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

TEXAS SUPREME COURT12. In re Victor Del Rio, NO. 08-0896 (DENIED HABEAS CORPUS, WITHDREW W/O PREJ)13. UNITED STATES V. Tracey Del Rio & Douglas Warne individually & in his/her

official capacity as Administrative Judge in Family Division in HarrisCounty, NO. 09-0963 DENIED ANY POSSIBILITY OF A HEARING

US SUPREME COURT14. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TEXAS et al, NO. 09-6398, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

US COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

15. VICTOR DEL RIO V. UNITED STATES, NO. 09-130C, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS16. In re Victor Del Rio, NO. 09-20232, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

STATE COURT, TRAVIS COUNTY17. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DENISE DREXLER, NO. D-1-GN-09-000882, DENIED ALL RELIEF exceptIFP

OTHER18. CPS cases in 2007-2008 No.s 26492443 & 26550760 confirm SON is being neglected,

nervous and frightened (having been in his mother's custody for weeks after shesuddenly discontinues PETITIONER'S every other week custody (since 2006) & home

schooling (from Sep 2007 - Dec 16 2007), symptoms of mental retardation, agentssuspicion TRACEY is lying about PETITIONER, DENISE DREXLER is listed asCOLLATERAL CONTACT but redacted from reports, earlier copies FALSELY ACCUSEPETITIONER having meth lab near home,

PAGE 31


32/46

DCSup WoHC 2 of 8 USDCDC 32 OF 46

IN THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF D.C.

EX PARTE

PURSUANT TO CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 'to override certain

PURSUANT TO 28 USC 2254, The Supreme Court, a Justice thereof, a circuit

judge, or a district court shall entertain an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment

of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of

the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.


33/46


EX PARTE


34/46


EX PARTE


35/46


EX PARTE


36/46



37/46



38/46



39/46

USDCDC 39 OF 46


40/46

USDCDC 40 OF 46


41/46

USDCDC 41 OF 46


42/46

USDCDC 42 OF 46


43/46

USDCDC 43 OF 46


44/46

USDCDC 44 OF 46


45/46

2427 Pinpoint Drive

Spring, TX 77373

Ph: 713-359-0494

Fx: 515-474-2415

[email protected]

Jan 03, 2009

TEA Customer Service Complaint Process

Division of Human Resources

TEA Customer Service Representative

1701 North Congress Ave, Room 1-101

Austin, TX 78701-1494

Phone (512) 463-8200

My complaint is regarding Executive Director of Special Services for Spring Independent

School District, Denise Drexler.

In 2006, she openly asked my ex-wife, Tracey Del Rio, if our son, Nicholas, would need

transportation if I were no longer available in three different ARD meetings.

Since that time, there have been attempts on my life and liberty: twice in February 2008

(life), October 30 (liberty), and November 2008 (life).

Denise Drexler is obviously collaborating with Family Judge Warne who has removed all

my parental rights and access to my son. Ive since filed a Sect 1983 case against him in

1st Court of Appeals.

I consider this attached Disclaimer also a threat.

This leaves me no choice but to file suit for the safety of me and my son. Ill trust you look

into this matter quickly, for your sake.

Very best regards,

Victor Del Rio

1 of 2 USDCDC 45 OF 46


46/46

Dcdc Complaint All 20091221

Documents

Transcript of Dcdc Complaint All 20091221