DC Power Line Comunication

download DC Power Line Comunication

of 51

Transcript of DC Power Line Comunication

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    1/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    2/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    3/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    4/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    5/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    6/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    7/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    8/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    9/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    10/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    11/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    12/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    13/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    14/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    15/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    16/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    17/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    18/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    19/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    20/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    21/51

    experimental and model results. Note that, in Figure 9, there is close correlation between

    the experimental and model performance for the load resistance values of 500, 1000,

    and 200Q.

    800

    700 -

    600

    7ii'

    .E500

    Q.

    ~400c

    co

    -g300a.

    E

    -200 -

    100

    , , , '" I

    R, = 200 Ohm Exp

    R, = 200 Ohm Mod

    o R, = 100 Ohm Exp

    _ R, = 100 Ohm Mod

    R, = 50 Ohm Exp

    R, = 50 Ohm Mod

    I

    I I I

    . -, , . i '"1 I I

    (2)

    Fig. 9. Impedance of transmission line transformer with terminating resistor

    2.4. System Performance

    Having verified the TLT model, the next step is to evaluate the system performance

    when a number of nodes are connected to the CPS line through the Guanella TLT (See

    Figure 10). Note that the Guanella TLT is arranged in symmetric form for the sender and

    the receivers. Specifically, we are interested in broadcasting data to many receiver nodes,

    as illustrated in the figure. Gain and impedance must be evaluated as the number of nodes

    n becomes large. The impedance seen from the sender-side terminals is given by:

    ZOw) = Vin~W)

    linOw)

    The frequency transfer function from the input voltage of the sender to the output

    voltage of a receiver is given by:

    21

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    22/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    23/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    24/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    25/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    26/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    27/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    28/51

    the two are not directly linked. Therefore, the gain dip frequency and the peak impedance

    frequency can be separated.

    2500

    2000 -1= ~:~ I. - L-5e-5 .

    1500-----------

    1000 --------------------- --

    0.8 I L=5

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    29/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    30/51

    Fig. 15.

    Central Control

    Unit

    Prototype DC powerlinc communication system with 30 nodes

    Figure 16 shows the modem used to interface each node with the system.

    PIC16F84

    (A)

    Transmission Line

    Transformer

    D/A Converter AM Modulator

    Schmitt-Trigger

    Amplifier

    (B)

    Fig. 16. Top and bottom views of prototype modem

    It consists of a transmission line transformer, a coupling capacitor, a microprocessor

    (PIC 16F84), a signal modulation chipset, and a DC/DC converter. A DC servomotor

    equipped with a 12V PWM amplifier was connected to each node. The microprocessor is

    30

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    31/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    32/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    33/51

    -30

    -35 muu

    Freq [Hz]

    Fig. 18. Noise spectrum of operating motor and noise induced by randomly turning the

    motors on and off

    The desired transmission frequency depends not only on the line impedance and noise

    characteristics described above but also on the required transmission rate and the gain

    and peak impedance conditions discussed in the previous sections. Sending command

    information at and above 100 kbps determines the carrier frequency for modulation.

    Frequency shift keying (FSK) modulation chipsets using carrier frequencies between 3

    and 10 MHz meet this requirement. The required amplitude modulation (AM) carrier

    frequency is on the order of mega-Hertz2

    . The exact carrier frequency was determined

    based on the modem's coupling circuit design.

    3.2.2. Selection of Coupling Circuit Component Values

    We design the coupling circuitry based on the analysis described in the preViOUS

    section. In turn, experimental data is recorded and compared to the model to verify the

    design procedure. In addition to the bandwidth restrictions imposed by the power supply

    2 Carrier frequency values of AM chip sets have much more variability than their FSK

    counterparts. We chose to use AM in order to evaluate the transmission characteristics for a range

    of carrier frequencies from 2 - 10 MHz.

    33

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    34/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    35/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    36/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    37/51

    600

    500 -------i----t-_.LrtlliI~:I-t---,--!-i-i[r!-----, ~----[---i--i--!-!-!i!---------i----!-----i-1-i-!!

    100 --.m..~----LtU.UU. ..------l---.tLl-1~j-lmm--.~m.J..-i~~.~~: 1 111111 ' 1.1

    : : : : : : ::: :::. :::: :::: : : ::: "" I . . . . . . .. " . . . . . .. . o.o

    I , I

    "' I "' . . . . . .... . . . ,.... . . . .. .. , "'"..... , , .- ",..; ..- , .

    106

    Freq [Hz]

    Fig. 20. Signal transmission impedance viewed from sender for n = 1

    3000

    2500 uum+ - ---+ --+ --~-+-H H --------or - - - -+ -- -rn1-+-1-~~-1- u _m r n;._u~ --1-+-~-~+~---------r_m -rn -;--H - ;-r :........ , , . I . . . , .. "" "" .. . . . , .. . . . . . . . . . ...: ~ l::::::: :::: : :::: :::: : :::

    f:::l]:~ftjw~mItI:IJllli ltj::IlIIJIII::::I::::I:I!Irll: : : : : : : : : :::: : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : :::: : : : :: : : : : : ::: :::: : :::::: : : : : : : ::: :::: : :::1 i 1 ill 111 j i j i j j j 1 ~) j j i j i j ill j j j j i j ij

    50: mu-l:--t--tHl[tlu---I--turlJ~iu\::tUl-ttt!u-u!uLlJliJl104 105 106 107 108

    Freq[Hz]

    Fig. 21. Signal transmission impedance viewed from sender for n = 30

    The question may arise as to how well our model predicts the limiting case as n

    becomes large. To address this issue, it is helpful to look at the model and experimental

    results as a function of n. Specifically we can look at the magnitude of the impedance

    peak, and the frequency at which it occurs. We showed earlier that the peak magnitude

    and frequency reach a maximum and minimum value (respectively) well before n reaches

    infinity. We now try to calculate the error in the predicted and actual steady-state values.

    37

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    38/51

    Figure 22(A) shows how the peak magnitude varies as a function of n according to the

    model and experimental results. There is 'final' error of soon (20%). For the frequency

    plot given in Figure 22(B), there is an error of 50 kHz (5%). Thus, while the limiting

    value of impedance magnitude shows significant error, the frequency at which it occurs

    can be predicted quite closely_ In our design procedure, this frequency is critical because

    it is used to help determine the parameter values of Table 1. However, the magnitude is

    not as important. Thus, the utility of the model is verified once again in terms of its

    ability to predict the limiting behavior as a function of n.

    2------ Experimental

    - Model

    30252015# Receivers n

    i

    1_5 \ ..: I.N I I

    ~ - -r -- -- -- -- -- -j --- -- -- ------j---- --- ----1- __m_

    g 1 --- -r---t---j- -1--~ I I i I~ ! I ! !

    ! I I0.5 --t I !

    I I II I 'I I 1

    302510 15 20# Receivers n

    5

    (A) (B)

    Fig. 22. Resonant behavior; peak magnitude and peak frequency as a function of the

    number of receivers

    38

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    39/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    40/51

    Fig. 23. Mobility aids for disabled children and elderly persons

    The mechanized walker and standing aid shown here both use some standard servo-

    system design. With the apparatus presented in this work, such machines can be

    simplified. The central controller and power supply (a battery, in this case) can be kept to

    a small size. Actuators can then be placed directly at the wheels, leaving the rest of the

    apparatus aesthetically appealing and easily maneuverable. A simple schematic

    illustrating this idea is pictured in Figure 24.

    40

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    41/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    42/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    43/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    44/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    45/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    46/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    47/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    48/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    49/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    50/51

  • 8/13/2019 DC Power Line Comunication

    51/51