Day One Morning 2013.

60
Three-Day Course Department of Structural Engineering, University of Naples, Federico II, Italy Consortium of University Earthquake Engineering Laboratories ReLUIS Luigi Di Sarno [email protected] Base-Isolation of Structures: From Conceptual Design to Applications 27-28 February & 1 March 2013 Port of Spain, Trinidad

description

Base Isolation

Transcript of Day One Morning 2013.

Page 1: Day One Morning 2013.

Three-Day Course

Department of Structural Engineering,University of Naples, Federico II, Italy

Consortium of University EarthquakeEngineering Laboratories ReLUIS

Luigi Di [email protected]

Base-Isolation of Structures:From Conceptual Design to Applications

27-28 February & 1 March 2013Port of Spain, Trinidad

Page 2: Day One Morning 2013.

Lecturer InfoDr. Luigi Di Sarno

Base-Isolation of Structures: From Conceptual Design to Applications

Current job positionAssistant Professor – University of Sannio, Department of Engineering,

Benevento, Italy;

Affiliate Researcher, University of Naples, Department of StructuralEngineering, Italy;

Visiting Professor at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA;

Honorary Faculty Staff at University of Bristol, UK;

Consultant for Council of Caribbean Engineering Organisations for theREAKT EU-funded project; Member of Disaster Management AdvisoryGroup (DIMAG); Technical Secretary of RELUIS Consortium.

QualificationLaurea, DIC (Imperial), MSc, PhD, PE, MASCE, MACI.

ExpertiseReinforced concrete and steel structures; Multi-hazard design (wind and earthquake);Base isolation and supplemental damping for new and existing structures; Hospitals

Page 3: Day One Morning 2013.

Outline

DAY ONEPassive Control of Structures

Principles of Base Isolation of Structures

DAY TWO

Earthquake Response of Structures

Fundamentals of Structural Earthquake Engineering

DAY THREE

Design of Base Isolated Structures

Design of a Base Isolated Hospital Building

Base-Isolation of Structures: From Conceptual Design to Applications

Page 4: Day One Morning 2013.

References

Chopra, A.K. (2007). Earthquake Dynamics of Structures: Theory andApplications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall.

Christopoulos, C. & Filiatrault, A. (2006). Principles of Passive SupplementalDamping and Seismic Isolation. IUSS PRESS, Pavia, Italy.

Elnashai, A.S. and Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of EarthquakeEngineering, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

Kelly, J.M. (1996). Earthquake Resistant Design with Rubber. 2nd Edition.Springer-Verlag Inc., New York.

Naeim, F. e Kelly, J.M. (1999). Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: fromTheory to Practice. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Base-Isolation of Structures: From Conceptual Design to Applications

Page 5: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive Control of Structures

Three-Day Course

Department of Structural Engineering,University of Naples, Federico II, Italy

Consortium of University EarthquakeEngineering Laboratories ReLUIS

Luigi Di [email protected]

27-28 February & 1 March 2013Port of Spain, Trinidad

Page 6: Day One Morning 2013.

Natural catastrophes

Page 7: Day One Morning 2013.

Eart

hqua

kes

Natural catastrophes

Page 8: Day One Morning 2013.

Critical Facilities

TransportationSystems

InfrastructureSystems

Building Stock

PhysicalDamage

Social and EconomicConsequences

Housing

Health

Emergency Shelter,Temporary Housing

Direct Damage, PriceIncreases, BusinessInterruption, Supply

Disruption

Casualties, Fatalities,Health Care Disruption

SocialDisruptionEmergency Supplies,

Family Separation

HazardEvent

Short Term Long TermRelocation,

Displacement

Fiscal Impacts,Business Failure,

Job Loss,Reconstruction

PsychologicalDistress,

Chronic Injury

Family Stress,Neighborhood

Disruption

Assessment ofImpact

EconomicLoss

Soci

al V

ulne

rabi

lity

Passive Control of Structures

Page 9: Day One Morning 2013.

Conceptual Structural Design

• Stiffness is the fundamental response quantity to controlthe Damageability Limit State

• Accelerations and/or Displacements control is essential tocheck the Operational Limit State

• Strength / Ductility (plastic rotations, inter-storeydisplacements, etc.) are of paramount importance to controlthe Life Safety and Collapse Prevention Limit States

• Adequate Conceptual Design is a trade-off betweenStrength / Stiffness / Ductility / Accelerations

Passive Control of Structures

Page 10: Day One Morning 2013.

Conceptual Structural Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 11: Day One Morning 2013.

Source: Miranda, Stanford University, USA

Conceptual Structural Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 12: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive Control of Structures

Performance level and objectives

Page 13: Day One Morning 2013.

Conceptual Structural Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 14: Day One Morning 2013.

Cost Breakdown

Traditional Designer

Modern Designer

Next GenerationDesigner

Conceptual Structural Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 15: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive Control of Structures

Performance level and objectives

Page 16: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive Control of Structures

Performance level and objectives

Page 17: Day One Morning 2013.

How should we design reliablycritical facilities?

Passive Control of Structures

Performance levels

Page 18: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive Control of Structures

Conceptual Design

Page 19: Day One Morning 2013.

Energy approach

Passive Control of Structures

Conceptual Design

Page 20: Day One Morning 2013.

Seismic protection strategies: possible design approach

Conceptual Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 21: Day One Morning 2013.

Seismic protection strategies: possible design approach

ResponseExcitation Structure

CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WITH PASSIVE CONTROL

PED

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WITH HYBRID CONTROL

PED

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WITH SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL

PED

AutomaticControl

Sensors Sensors

AutomaticActuators

ResponseExcitation Structure

ResponseExcitation Structure

ResponseExcitation Structure

ResponseExcitation Structure

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WITH ACTIVE CONTROL

AutomaticActuators

AutomaticControl

Sensors Sensors

AutomaticControl

Sensors Sensors

AutomaticActuators

Passive Control of Structures

Conceptual Design

Page 22: Day One Morning 2013.

Seismic protection strategies: possible design approach

TYPE OF CONTROL RANGE OF APPLICATION DEGREE OF MATURITY

Seismic Isolation Low-to-medium rise buildings(either new or existing).

Bridges and subways. Equipment or facilities.

Mature technique. Many theoretical and practical

results. Many applications world-wide.

Energy Dissipation Medium-to-high rise buildings(either new or existing).

Towers, stacks and chimneys. Medium-to-long span bridges. Lifelines.

Mature technique. Many theoretical and practical

results. Many applications world-wide.

Passive Control Medium-to-high rise buildings. Towers, stacks and chimneys. Medium-to-long span bridges. Lifelines.

Relatively mature technique. Several theoretical and practical

results. Several applications world-wide.

Active, Semi-Activeand Hybrid Control

High rise buildings. Towers, stacks and chimneys. Medium-to-long span bridges.

Ongoing research stage. Several theoretical results. Few applications world-wide.

Passive Control of Structures

Conceptual Design

Page 23: Day One Morning 2013.

Conceptual Design

Passive Control of Structures

)()()()()( tEtEtEtEtE IHξSK INPUT ENERGY

HYSTERETIC ENERGY

VISCOUS ENERGY

ELASTIC (STRAIN) ENERGY

KINETIC ENERGY

SEISMIC MOTIONSeismic protection strategies: possible design approach

Page 24: Day One Morning 2013.

Seismic protection strategies: possible design approach

Passive Control of Structures

Conceptual Design

Page 25: Day One Morning 2013.

Seismic protection strategies: basic questions

How does it work?

TRADITIONAL INNOVATIVE

Conceptual Design

Passive Control of Structures

Page 26: Day One Morning 2013.

Damper Response

Passive Control of Structures

Page 27: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive control: Supplemental damping

Damper Response

Passive Control of Structures

Page 28: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive control: Supplemental damping

Damper Response

Passive Control of Structures

Page 29: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive control: Supplemental damping

Hysteretic metallic devicesADASADAS

BRBBRB

DAMPER ONBRACE

DAMPER ONBRACE

ELICOIDAL SPRINGS DEVICES AND “OMEGA” LEADELICOIDAL SPRINGS DEVICES AND “OMEGA” LEAD

U-STRIPU-STRIP

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Page 30: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive control: Supplemental damping

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Friction type devices

Page 31: Day One Morning 2013.

Passive control: Supplemental damping

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Viscous dampers

Page 32: Day One Morning 2013.

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Page 33: Day One Morning 2013.

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Page 34: Day One Morning 2013.

Dampers

Passive Control of Structures

Page 35: Day One Morning 2013.

Base Isolation Systems

Passive Control of Structures

Page 36: Day One Morning 2013.

Pioneering applications for critical facilities

Reduction of the dynamic amplificationof the seismic action at the base(Ais/Abf = 1/3, located @ epicentral distance of 30km)

USC Hospital Building, L.A., California

Deam

plifi

catio

n

Northridge Earthquake (1994)

Uni

form

For

ce D

istrib

utio

n

Vertical Irregularity

0.21g

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 37: Day One Morning 2013.

Pioneering applications for critical facilities in Italy

GERVASUTTA, UDINE

OSPEDALE DEL MARE, NAPOLI

PINETA MARE, CASERTA

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 38: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#1: NEW CONSTRUCTION of ANAS (DOT) Building in L’Aquila

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 39: Day One Morning 2013.

11J

11K

11H

12H

12J

12K

13K

13J

13H14K

14J

14H

15K15J

15H

16K16J

16H

17K

17J 17H

18K

18J

18H

19K

19J

19H

20K

20J

20H

1K

1J

1H

2K

2J

2H

3K

3J

3H

4H

4J

4K

5H

5J5K

6H

6J6K

7H

7J

7K

8H

8J

8K

9H

9J

9K

10K

10J

10H

x = 0.00y = 0.00

N

S

EW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1011

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

11a

18a

4a

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

1st Mode

2nd Mode

3rd Mode

Page 40: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#2: : Progetto [email protected].

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 41: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#2: : Progetto [email protected].

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 42: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#2: : Progetto [email protected].

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 43: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#3: : New school buildings

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 44: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#3: : New school buildings

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 45: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#4: RETROFIT of L’Aquila Justice Court Palace, Italy

Replacement of floors light-weigth design

Base Isolation with LDR-LC

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 46: Day One Morning 2013.

Step-by-step procedure:

1. Application of the rigid vice;

2. Application of hydraulic jacks;

3. Lifting of the jacks (loading);

4. Block up of the jacks;

5. Installation of the belt saw;

6. Cut of the column slice;

7. Remove the column slice;

8. Installation of the isolator;

9. Remove the jacks (unloading);

10. Remove the vice.

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 47: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#5: : Existing residential buildings @ L’Aquila, Italy

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

RC ColumnsCutting

Courtesy of CONSTA spa

Page 48: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Existing residential buildings @ L’Aquila, Italy

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Building Uplift

Courtesy of CONSTA spa

Patented technology

Page 49: Day One Morning 2013.

CONSTA PATENT (UPLIFT)

Passive Control of StructuresCourtesy of CONSTA spa

Page 50: Day One Morning 2013.

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Unseating

Span collapses at the Golden State-Antelope Valley interchange collectors during the1971 San Fernando (left) and the 1994 Northridge (right) earthquakes in California

Page 51: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Highway Bridges

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Punching

Punching of piles through the road bed of the State Route 1, Watsonville area,span during the 1989 Loma Prieta (California) earthquake

Page 52: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Highway BridgesApplications

Passive Control of Structures

Page 53: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Highway BridgesApplications

Passive Control of Structures

isofFPS R

NNV

Page 54: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Highway BridgesApplications

Passive Control of Structures

The method, which is derived from thedirect displacement based procedureproposed by Priestley et al. (2007),proposes a few modifications to thegeneral method; specific design chartshave also been developed for the case ofisolation by means of FPS.The derived optimal isolator have a radiusR=3 m and a friction coefficient =4%A1 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 A2

0

0.025

0.05

0.075

0.1

0.125

0.15

0.175

0.2

Section ID

Tra

nsv

ersa

l d

isp

lace

men

t (m

)

Design deck displacementDesign pier displacementMean design pier displacement

Placement of the isolators

Page 55: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#6: : Highway BridgesApplications

Passive Control of Structures

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3-500

-250

0

250

500

ds - device slip (m)

Vd -

dev

ice

shea

r (k

N)

I1 I2 I3 I4

I5 I6 I7 I8

I9 I10 I11 I12

Pier 9

Pier 11

Page 56: Day One Morning 2013.

Isolators selection and their locationIsolators selection and their location

LRB IsolatorsDeck ≥ 50% MTOT

Steel Dampers Isolators

Case study: The “Cintura” Viaduct

Example#7: : Railway Bridges Applications

Page 57: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#7: : Railway Bridges

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Support bearings system (ULS)Support bearings system (ULS)

Pier – Local and global ductilityPier – Local and global ductility

FoundationFoundation

Lead Rubber Bearings

Page 58: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#7: : Railway Bridges

Applications

Passive Control of StructuresSteel Hysteretic Bearings

Ante

Page 59: Day One Morning 2013.

Example#7: : Railway Bridges

Applications

Passive Control of Structures

Steel Hysteretic Bearings

Post

Page 60: Day One Morning 2013.

How does it work?

Why Should We Use Base Isolation Systems (BIS)?

When Should We Use BIS?

Passive Control of Structures

Base Isolation Systems