Day 15: Problems: Interests · Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 5 / 19. A Political Contest \In...
Transcript of Day 15: Problems: Interests · Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 5 / 19. A Political Contest \In...
Day 15: Problems: Interests
Daniel J. Mallinson
School of Public AffairsPenn State [email protected]
PUBPL 304
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 1 / 19
Road map
Finish discussing causes and start discussing role ofinterest groups in problem framing
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 2 / 19
Problem Definition
Symbols
Numbers
Causes
Interests
Decisions
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 3 / 19
Types of Causal Theories
Consequences
Actions Intended Unintended
Unguided Mechanical Cause Accidental Cause
Guided Intentional Cause Inadvertent Cause
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 4 / 19
A Political Contest
Not just about finding “the” cause
Claimant
Show that previously-assumed natural cause is anintentional/inadvertent harm
Respondent
Claim strongest position possible, then blame shift, then take weakerposition, then claim inadvertent harm
Law and Science
Legitimize claims of causation
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 5 / 19
A Political Contest
“In the polis, causal stories need to be fought for,defended, and sustained.” (Stone, 223)
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 6 / 19
Using Causal Claims
Challenge or reinforcethe status quo
Assign responsibility andcost
Give authority to “fixers”
Create new alliances
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 7 / 19
Interests
Nuclear Power
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 8 / 19
Interests
“... people and organizations who have a stake in
an issue or are affected by it.” (Stone, 229)
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 9 / 19
Nuclear Power
Who are the interests?
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 10 / 19
Market vs. Polis Views of Interests
MarketIndividual
Selective
Formedindependently
PolisDynamic
Social
Elite-driven
Interests and issuesdefine each other
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 11 / 19
Source of Interests
Group identities and membership
Leaders articulate interests for groups
Thus, interests are latent until activated
Paradox of representation: Leader speech seeks to convinceothers and followers
Why? Mobilization
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 12 / 19
Mobilization
Lots of interests, not all are demanded
Common interest + organization for influencing policy
Types of groups:
ProfessionalSocial movementsAdvocacy organizations
Suppression of mobilization
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 13 / 19
Theories
Pluralism
Rational Choice
Stone’s Polis
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 14 / 19
Pluralism
1950s - 1970s
All groups have equal chanceto be heard
Competition ensures equalityof voice
Groups will form as a naturalresult of grievances
No recognition of grouppower imbalances
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 15 / 19
Rational Choice
1970s - 1980s
Interest mobilization isexception, not the rule
Groups need to offer selectivebenefits
Free-rider problem
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 16 / 19
Stone’s Polis
Builds on more recentresearch and theory
Missed realities of rationalchoice:
RelationshipsWe talkPerpetual energy ofcollective actionPassionSymbols and ambiguity
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 17 / 19
How Issues and Interests Define Each Other
Benefits
Costs Diffuse Concentrated
Diffuse Gradual expansion Benefactor mobilizes
Concentrated Opposition mobilizes Stalemate;alternative victories
How does this apply to nuclear power?
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 18 / 19
How Issues and Interests Define Each Other
Benefits
Costs Diffuse Concentrated
Diffuse Gradual expansion Benefactor mobilizes
Concentrated Opposition mobilizes Stalemate;alternative victories
How does this apply to nuclear power?
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 18 / 19
Key Point
“Policy issues don’t determine the kind of political
contests that occur; instead, politics shapes the
way policy issues are portrayed and perceived in
the first place.” (Stone, 241)
Mallinson Day 15 September 25, 2017 19 / 19