DavidFullPPT_ch9
-
Upload
maharani-kumalasari -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
1
description
Transcript of DavidFullPPT_ch9
-
Chapter 9Strategy Review, Evaluation, & Control
Strategic Management: Concepts & Cases10th EditionFred David
PowerPoint Slides byAnthony F. ChelteWestern New England College
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Chapter Outline
The Nature of Strategy EvaluationA Strategy-Evaluation FrameworkThe Balanced Scorecard
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Chapter Outline
Published Sources of StrategyEvaluation InformationCharacteristics of an Effective Evaluation SystemContingency Planning
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Chapter Outline (contd)
Auditing21st Century Challenges in Strategic Management
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Organizations are most vulnerable when they are at the peak of their success --R.T. LenzStrategy Review
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
-- Strategies become obsolete-- Internal environments are dynamic-- External environments are dynamicStrategy Review, Evaluation & Control
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Vital to the organizations well-beingAlert management to potential/actual problems in a timely fashionErroneous strategic decisions can have severe negative impact on organizationsStrategy Evaluation, Review, & ControlStrategy Evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Examine the underlying bases of a firms strategyCompare expected to actual resultsIdentify corrective actions to ensure that performance conforms to plansStrategy Evaluation, Review & Control3 Basic Activities
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Complex & sensitive undertaking
Overemphasis can be costly & counterproductiveStrategy Evaluation, Review & ControlStrategy Evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlHave assets increasedIncrease in profitabilityIncrease in salesIncrease in productivityProfit margins, ROI, & EPS ratios increased
Appraisal of Strategic Performance
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
ConsonanceConsistencyFeasibilityAdvantageRummelts4 Criteria
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlStrategy should not present inconsistent goals & policiesConsistency
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
ConsonanceConsistencyFeasibilityAdvantageRummelts4 Criteria
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlNeed for strategies to examine sets of trendsConsonance
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
ConsonanceConsistencyFeasibilityAdvantageRummelts4 Criteria
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlNeither overtax resources or create unsolvable sub-problemsFeasibility
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
ConsonanceConsistencyFeasibilityAdvantageRummelts4 Criteria
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlCreation or maintenance of competitive advantageAdvantage
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlIncrease in environments complexityDifficulty predicting future with accuracyIncreasing number of variablesDifficulties in Strategy Evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlRate of obsolescence of plansDomestic and global eventsDecreasing time span for planning certaintyDifficulties in Strategy Evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlInitiate managerial questioningTrigger review of objectives & valuesStimulate creativity in generating alternativesStrategy Evaluation Should --
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlDevelop revised EFE Matrix
Develop revised IFE MatrixReview of underlying bases of strategy --
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlCompetitors reaction to strategyCompetitors change in strategyCompetitors changes in strengths & weaknessesReasons for competitors strategic changeReview effectiveness of strategy --
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlReasons for competitors successful strategiesCompetitors present market positions & profitabilityPotential for competitor retaliationPotential for cooperation with competitorsReview effectiveness of strategy --
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlAre strengths still strengths?Have we added additional strengths?Are weaknesses still weaknesses?Have we developed other weaknesses?Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses; Opportunities & Threats
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlAre opportunities still opportunities?Other opportunities develop?Are threats still threatsOther threats emerged?Are we vulnerable to hostile takeover?Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses; Opportunities & Threats
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Evaluation FrameworkContinue present courseDifferences?Differences?YesNOYesNO
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlCompare expected to actual resultsInvestigate deviations from planEvaluate individual performanceProgress toward stated objectivesMeasuring Organizational Performance
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlFinancial RatiosCompare performance over different periodsCompare performance to competitorsCompare performance to industry averagesQuantitative Criteria for Strategy Evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlReturn on investment (ROI)Return on equity (ROE)Profit marginMarket ShareKey Financial Ratios
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlDebt to equityEarnings per share (EPS)Sales growthAsset growthKey Financial Ratios
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlInternal consistency of strategyConsistency with environmentAppropriateness in view of resourcesQualitative Evaluation of Strategy
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlAcceptable degree of riskAppropriate time frameWorkability of the strategyQualitative Evaluation of Strategy
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
-- Evaluate strategies from 4 perspectives:1. Financial performance2. Customer knowledge3. Internal business processes4. Learning & growthStrategy Evaluation, Review & ControlBalanced Scorecard
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Balanced Scorecard
Area of ObjectivesMeasure or TargetTime ExpectationPrimary ResponsibilityCustomers12Managers/Employees12Operations/Processes12Community/Social Responsibility12Business Ethics/Natural Environment12Financial12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlEconomicalMeaningfulGenerates useful informationTimely informationProvides accurate picture of eventsCharacteristics of strategy evaluation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy-Evaluation Assessment Matrix
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control Alternative plans that can be put into effect if certain key events do not occur as expectedContingency Planning
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlFinancial audits determine correspondence between assertions based on strategic plan & established criteria
Environmental audits insure sound and safe practicesAuditing
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Strategy Evaluation, Review & ControlProcess is more an art than scienceShould strategies be visible or hidden from stakeholdersShould process be more top-down or bottom up21st Century Challenges in Strategic Management
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Key Terms & ConceptsFor Review (Chapter 9)AdvantageContingency PlansAuditingCorporate AgilityFeasibilityConsonanceBalanced Score CardConsistency
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
-
Key Terms & ConceptsFor Review (Chapter 9)Management by WanderingAroundRevised EFE MatrixMeasuring Organizational PerformanceRevised IFE MatrixTaking Corrective ActionReviewing UnderlyingBases of StrategyFuture Shock
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall