From: Carol FormanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:18 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Carol Forman

mailto:atlantis3@comcast.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)To: bonnie KleaCc: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: RE: NASA Announces Availability of Draft EIS for Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL)Date: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:48:15 PM

Hi, Bonnie,The procedure (in the Notice of Availability) asks you to make this request to:Allen Elliott, SSFL Project Director, by phone at (256) 544-0662 or by email at msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov.So by this email I am doing it for you. I no longer have your home address. Could you please provide it to msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov? Thank you. Merrilee

From: bonnie Klea [mailto:bonnie1@dslextreme.com] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:34 PMTo: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)Subject: Re: NASA Announces Availability of Draft EIS for Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) Merrilee, Could I reserve a hard copy of the DEIS, if you have one. I plan to attend theCorp. Pointe meetings.

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000) wrote: NASA has announced, in the Federal Register, the Notice of Availability of a DraftEnvironmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The DEIS evaluates potentialenvironmental impacts of proposed demolition and environmental cleanup activities ofproperty administered by NASA at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) inCalifornia. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires analysis of potential impactsof certain actions undertaken by a federal agency. NASA is preparing to implementsoil and groundwater cleanup required under agreements executed with the CaliforniaDepartment of Toxic Substances. NASA also is preparing the land for disposition, orexcess, which is through the Department of General Services. NASAs preparationincludes consideration of the potential demolition of all structures on SSFL. The DEIS is intended to inform NASA decision-makers, regulating agencies, and thepublic of the potential environmental consequences of the proposed demolition ofbuildings and structures and the proposed environmental cleanup actions forgroundwater and soil at the NASA-administered portion of the SSFL. The DEISconsiders a range of remedial technologies that might be implemented to achieve theproposed groundwater and soil remediation goals. NASA will use the DEIS toconsider the potential environmental, economic, and social impacts of the proposed

mailto:/O=NASA/OU=JSC/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=777778515mailto:bonnie1@dslextreme.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:mfellows@nasa.gov

remediation action. This announcement initiates a public comment period that closes on September 16,2013. Two public meetings will be held to receive comments on the DEIS, on August27, 2013, from 2:00-4:00 p.m., and on August 28, 2013, from 6:00-8:00 p.m., bothmeetings at Corporate Pointe in the Auditorium at 8413 Fallbrook Avenue, West Hills,Calif. 91304. To review the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register, visit:https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-18700 To review the Draft EIS, visit:http://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.html. To learn more about NASAs cleanup at SSFL, visit:http://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov.

https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-18700http://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.htmlhttp://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov/

From: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)To: Adam Slee; MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: RE: Draft Environmental Impact CommentDate: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:05:25 PM

Adam,Thankyouforyourcomments.TobecomeofficialcommentsforconsiderationintheDEISprocess,ifelectronicallysubmitted(ashere),theyneedtobesubmittedtotheemailnotedabove:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov.Ihavedonethatforyouwiththisemail.IfyouoryourcolleagueshaveadditionalcommentsonorbeforeOct.1,pleasesubmitthemtothatemailaddress.MerrileeFellows

From: Adam Slee [mailto:adam.slee030@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:00 AMTo: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)Cc: adam.slee030@gmail.comSubject: Draft Environmental Impact CommentTheattachedisacommentforyourconsideration.Iamawareoftheframeworkrequirementsregardingremovalofallhazardouswastesbutconsidercontainmentshouldatleastbeconsideredasavalidalternative.Containmentwillbelessenvironmentallyharmfulandalotcheapertoexecute.KindregardsAdamSlee

mailto:/O=NASA/OU=JSC/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=777778515mailto:adam.slee030@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Cynthia WrightTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:41:12 AM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Cynthia Wright

mailto:virginbirthprod@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: CHRISTINE STEWARTTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EIS- Clean up the mess!Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 6:54:04 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

CHRISTINE STEWART

mailto:atticuss@pacbell.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Darren SkotnesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:21 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Darren Skotnes

mailto:dskotnes18@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Jim PetkiewiczTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:35 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Jim Petkiewicz

mailto:peckos@me.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: John OzedTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:38 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

John Ozed

mailto:johnozed@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Lauren MurdockTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:52 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Lauren Murdock

mailto:murdock_ls@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: RICARDO BARBA OCHOATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:52 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

RICARDO BARBA OCHOA

mailto:rik_e8780@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Veronica HayesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:01 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Veronica Hayes

mailto:veronicalhayes@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: R GordonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:02 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

R Gordon

mailto:rgordon14@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: JACK PAPAZIANTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:03 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

JACK PAPAZIAN

mailto:jackbail@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: k hipkinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:09 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

k hipkins

mailto:klhipkins@msn.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Ross HeckmannTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:15 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Ross Heckmann

mailto:RossS.Heckmann@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: ANGELA BARKERTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:18 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

ANGELA BARKER

mailto:angelambarker@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Danton KonoTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:19 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Danton Kono

mailto:dkono@chw.edumailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Dallas DekeyrelTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:21 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Dallas Dekeyrel

mailto:dallasdekeyrel@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Margaret T.M. PetkiewiczTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:30 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Margaret T.M. Petkiewicz

mailto:margarita.p830@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Isabelle Ferte ArmourTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:35 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Isabelle Ferte Armour

mailto:zazaarmour@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: kerry drakeTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:44 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

kerry drake

mailto:kerrydrake@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Michael SwansonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:49 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Michael Swanson

mailto:swanson71258@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Daniel GellerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:53 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Daniel Geller

mailto:dgel@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: DARLENE NORWOODTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:09 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

DARLENE NORWOOD

mailto:darlenenorwood@mac.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: LAWRENCE ROSENBERGTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:23 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

LAWRENCE ROSENBERG

mailto:larryrosenberg@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: ADRIAN DENATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:24 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

ADRIAN DENA

mailto:adro_la@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: ARTURO DIAZTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:29 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

ARTURO DIAZ

mailto:atdiaz@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Will MooreTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:40 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Will Moore

mailto:sk292009@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Steven CollinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:09 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Steven Collins

mailto:sc89@jhu.edumailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Dolores J. ArondTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:19 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Dolores J. Arond

mailto:djarond@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Deb ChristensenTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:26 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Deb Christensen

mailto:jenizakc@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: jennifer lopezTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:31 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

jennifer lopez

mailto:jenkiki78@Yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Robert RosenbergTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:31 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Robert Rosenberg

mailto:endobob@earthlink.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: seth carrTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:34 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

seth carr

mailto:scarr77@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Caryn GravesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:40 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Caryn Graves

mailto:caryn@lmi.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: KRISTOFFER POLAHATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:42 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

KRISTOFFER POLAHA

mailto:kristofferpolaha@mac.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Juli LoupeTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:57 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Juli Loupe

mailto:julimalibu@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: MARYANNE JACKSONTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:03 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

MARYANNE JACKSON

mailto:westcoastproperties@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Brian BensonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:10 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Brian Benson

mailto:bk_benson@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: John TeevanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:15 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

John Teevan

mailto:jptrugger@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Patty GroganTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:23 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Patty Grogan

mailto:pattygrogan@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Michael ElkinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:33 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Michael Elkins

mailto:mikensd@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Corey LaneTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:35 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Corey Lane

mailto:cori@loanleaders.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: LUIS CAMARENATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:37 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

LUIS CAMARENA

mailto:ldcamarena@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Todd SnyderTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:39 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Todd Snyder

mailto:todd.clark.snyder@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: MOSES CARLTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:39 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

MOSES CARL

mailto:moses.carl@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: MICHAEL TOCZEKTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:54 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

MICHAEL TOCZEK

mailto:michaeltoczek@att.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Stepheny McGrawTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:58 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Stepheny McGraw

mailto:stepheny@earthlink.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Naomi SoboTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:22 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Naomi Sobo

mailto:gramnome@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Lawrence BaldwinTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:23 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Lawrence Baldwin

mailto:lhbaldwin@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: WILLIAM HOOPERTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:24 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

WILLIAM HOOPER

mailto:billhooper77@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: George BehrmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:24 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

George Behrman

mailto:george@auc.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Gerald StratmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:38 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Gerald Stratman

mailto:zonker8012@comcast.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Brandyn GibsonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:40 PM

I could care less about what the rest of this says, but treat the environment of earth as you would analien planet. Preserve!

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Brandyn Gibson

mailto:gibson3412@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: nancy blastosTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

nancy blastos

mailto:nab1180@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: nancy blastosTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

nancy blastos

mailto:nab1180@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: larry bairdTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

larry baird

mailto:larrycbaird@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Mike JonesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:57 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Mike Jones

mailto:mike.d.jones@umusic.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Adam LaneTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:59 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Adam Lane

mailto:enalmada@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Clayton Barbeau, M.A., MFTTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:00 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

Clayton Barbeau, M.A., MFT

mailto:barbeau@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: PAblo MedinaTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:14 PM

Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.

In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.

It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.

PAblo Medina

mailto:tetuserectus@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Roy TuckmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:17:12 AM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

Roy Tuckman

mailto:rtuckman@kpfk.orgmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Brendan DwyerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:23:56 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

Brendan Dwyer

mailto:bdwyer81@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Horace GaimsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:26:23 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

Horace Gaims

mailto:HGAIMS@AOL.COMmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: William BoddenTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:29:19 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

William Bodden

mailto:bbodden@bendcable.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Teri HittTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:18 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

Teri Hitt

mailto:info@terihitt.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: janet makerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:22 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.

Sincerely,

janet maker

mailto:jamaker2001@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov

From: Robert HeronTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:33 PM

Dear Mr. Elliott,

Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.

NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.

NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.

NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement