Data tools for_sustainable_ftth_projects
-
Upload
carl-denis -
Category
Technology
-
view
547 -
download
4
Transcript of Data tools for_sustainable_ftth_projects
Data & Tools for Sustainable FTTH ProjectsPresented by:
Carl Denis : GiSmartware
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
Data & Tools for Sustainable FTTH Projects
What do we put into that subject ? What do we mean by sustainable ?
• Speaking about a sustainable network we mean one which will be in operation for 20-
30 years providing adequate services to its users.
• It means, we should take into account the “landscape” in 30 years, which would cover
the demographic, economic, social and others factors of the area where the network
would be built.
FTTH Network : a really difficult object to build
• Need for serious approaches regarding handling data over time
• Extremely key to have the right tools
FTTX deployment proves tedious and expensive
• Infrastructure (passive network) works means billions of $ of investment
• E.g. $300 billion for Europe only
• Mistakes on planning phases translate into huge waste of money on the building phases
• Most incumbent telcos or other builders have not deployed physical networks to
subs since the time of the copper lines many years ago (> 30 y)
• Skills and tools have been lost
• Network design mostly manual
• Consequences are numerous:
• Wrong investment decisions
• Underestimation of deployment costs
• Delays on construction and commercialization
• Ill-designed and not consistent network engineering
• Uncontrolled spending on construction works
FTTH is a major challenge for Operators
The rollout of FTTH network is more than a technical
project:
• requires full alignment with marketing and other
Business Units
• It requires mastering the playground
• Requires amount of compromise in a complex
environment
• In a Corporate environment requires full alignment
with affiliates
• But requires to play by the local specificities rules
Operator stakes and approach
Scrupulously follow a sequential methodology is a key success factor to meet the KPI
Network
Planning
& Engineering
Strategic
studies
THINK
Project
& Roll-out
Management
Acceptance
CommissioningRFI, RFQ
BUILD
Operation &
Maintenance
RUN
Optimization
The Agenda
Workshop Program
• 13H00 – 14H30
– Workshop introduction
– Data & Tools in the planning/design phaseMain Speakers:
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 14H30 - 15H00 Coffee Break
• 15H00 – 15H45
– Data & Tools in the building phaseMain Speakers:
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 15H45 – 16H30
Data & Tools in Operation and Maintenance
Trends on handling data & tools usage
Final wrap-up
Main Speakers:
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alain Meller: SETICS
The presenters
ACOME is major manufacturer of passive infrastructure for telecommunication networks. With sales offices in France, Germany, Italy and China and factories in France, Tunisia and China ACOME supply its global customers worldwide.
Digpro is the maker of dpCom, a PNI (or NIS, NLM..) that stretch from planning, operation to maintenance. Sister products of dpCom include dpPower, dpGas, dpHeating and dpWater. Digproalso make dpWholesale, a market place for the trade of capacity and dark fiber services
GiSmartware is a software development firm specialized in Geographic Information Systems(GIS). We develop the PNI (Physical Network Inventory) NETGEO and its web portal NETGEO ONLINE to help hundreds of network’s owner and operator to operate their infrastructures.
Setics is a consulting and project management company in High Broadband Infrastructure as wellas a software editor with Setics Sttar the FTTx Design Automation Software. Setics has offices in France and Germany.
Sofrecom, an Orange subsidiary, has developed over 45 years a unique know-how about operator businesses, making it a world leading specialist in telecommunications consultancy and engineering.
Definition and scope: FTTH, FTTx
What do we mean by FTTH, FTTx in this workshop ?
• In the course of this
workshop
• FTTx or FTTH
encompasse : FTTC,
FTTDp (FTTla),
FTTB, FTTH
Key questions arise for FTTH
• What are the services to be delivered to the market (B2C, B2B)?
• What will be the high level marketing mix ( Product, price, promotion,
place) and expected revenue?
• Will the strategy be wholesale or retail only?
• What is the relevant Broadband business case ?
• What would be the priorities for such a deployment (Countries, cities,
areas…)?
• Which possible partners could be identified: fund providers, construction
companies (in order to lay cables or equip new buildings), other
operators in order to share risks…?
Key questions arise for FTTH
• Which access network infrastructure shall be chosen : FTTCab,
FTTBuilding, FTTHome ?
• Which IP End to end architecture shall be specified: key factor of
success to master QoS and Customer Experience satisfaction
• Which contractual model shall I choose ?
• Which IT solution shall I chose to master inventory management
and Customer care
• Which Home Network strategy shall be develop to differentiate
Customer Experience to challengers
• How to define engineering rules and ITU standards to be applied
What Data ? What Tools ?
Data
• Data are given as inputs and constraints
• Data are produced in the course of network
lifecycle
• Data are coming from different sources with
different format
• Data is often scattered and not referenced
• Data around FTTx network extremely abundant
Gr@ceTHD has defined > 500 entities and >
3000 properties to represent all valuable data
that must be exchanged between
stakeholders, one time or another, along the
lifecycle of an FTTx network … and is said to
be still not complete.
Tools
• Tools are used to around data to :
elaborate them from other data,
manage them
Share them,
analyse and make decisions
Data is an asset but need tools to deliver their value
Definition and Scope: Software tools (main ones)
What we mean with the different terms ?
• CAD Software
– Software for supporting the manual sketching of spatial plans
– Very mature category: AUTOCAD being the dominant vendor
• GIS Software
– Software for creating and managing geo-localized objects (points, lines, polylines, polygones etc…) withattributes
– Comes as Desktop software as well as back-end database systems
• Design Automation Software
– Create a network based on input data, engineering rules and other constraints
– Based on GIS engines
– Emerging Category used in the planning phases
• PNI: Physical Network Inventory Systems
– Create & Manage all assets in the field, is, in most of the case including a GIS function to view objects on a map
– Mature Category with utilities (electricity, gas, water) made is way in telecom (copper, cable, fibre)
Questions about Data and Tools
• In the course of the workshop we will address the following questions in the various
phases:
• What is it ? (what data or tool)
• Why is it important ? (why this data and tool is important)
• When it is important ? (in which phase this is important)
• What to do in case, I do not have the right data at hand or I do not have the
expected quality?
The Agenda
Workshop Program
• 13H00 – 14H30
– Workshop introduction
– Data & Tools in the planning/design phaseMain Speakers:
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 14H30 - 15H00 Coffee Break
• 15H00 – 15H45
– Data & Tools in the building phaseMain Speakers:
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 15H45 – 16H30
Data & Tools in Operation and Maintenance
Trends on handling data & tools usage
Final wrap-up
Main Speakers:
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alain Meller: SETICS
Why a planning phase ?
• Marketing
– Get tangible and relevant scenarios and business cases
– Validate cost structure for equipment & infrastructure sourcing
– Define Customer target, services portfolio and pricing
– Build mass market deployment strategic roadmap
• Technical
– Ease FTTH project integration in operator Network Master Plan– To ensure that ITU standards will be respected– To define engineering rules to protect the operator’s best interests
• Implementation
– Build Tools, Methods and Procedures to insure contractual commitments with expected time, costs, scope and quality
– Geographical, inventory, network&service cross view databases– Provisioning tools & resourcesallocation– after-sales support tools for Customer Care-SMC
– Set up Operating and Maintenance process and to insure Customersatisfaction
Marketing
TechnicalImplementation
The different phase of network design/planning
Detailed Design
Inclusion of physical constraints as their acquisition progresses – New generation of the network –Computation of cables, splices and connection boxes - Export towards other systems
High-Level Design
Integration of more accurate data and engineering parameters – Generation of more focused paths –More precise cost estimation – List of materials – Better control on invitations to tender for civil work
Strategic Design Phase - Preliminary Studies
Preliminary data – First physical network planning and estimation of costs – Scenarios – Accelerates decision-making on business plan, on project scope and on priority of deployments
More often done in theBuilding phase
Input/Output Data in the Planning phaseIn
pu
t d
ata
Marketing
Consumer expectations
Geo-marketing
Financial
Revenue assumptions
Costs
Engineering
Architecture choices
Engineering rules
GeoDataEndpoints
Potentialpathways
Ou
tpu
t d
ata
Economical Business Plan, CAPEX/OPEX
Admin Right of ways
Technical
Architecturechoices
Engineering rules
BOQ
GeoData
Network routes
Cable/equipmentlayout
Optical routes
Methods & Data used in early costing
How do you evaluate de cost of a global FTTH roll-out in the early phase of a network project ?
• Statistical Methods
– Need few data : population density
– Based on geotypes: not easy to define
– Average cost per HP
– Lack of « great numbers » behind statistics
– Greenfield
– Highly country dependent
• Realistic Modeling
– Designing a realistic network
– Made possible by Design Automation Tools
– Based on GIS data
– Informative
– Garbage in / Garbage out
Methods comparison
GIS data accuracy(endpoints, pathways…)
Lower Greater
Result Reliability
Statistical Methods
?
Top-down Bottom-up
Network Model Evolution : planning phase
Accuracy of design
Accuracyof input
data
To BuildPlans
CAD Software
PNIGIS Desktop App
Design Automation
Software
Strategic Design Detailed Design
Planning Phase
High-level Design
Building Phase
High LevelDesign
HLD: Engineering with Constraints and Cost mastering
FTTH Network design
Geo Data, infrastructure,
equipments
Engineering Rules
Economic Data
What data is needed to build a design?
Geo Data : Endpoints, how to get them?
• Existing commercial database, post office
• Open sources : google, bing, openstreetmap
• Governemental sources : tax office, administration
• Utilities
• Site surveys, manual positionning
• Sometime crossing different database in necessary (location and #
dwelling)
• DB ARE OFTEN PHOTOS OF THE PAST !!
Main architectures of FTTH Network
SPLITTER
SPLITTER
Point – to – MultipointsPassive Optical Network
Point – to – Point
Active Optical Network
Data for Choice of Technical Solutions (STRATEGIC)
– Targeted customers• Consumers only
Simple architecture is enough• Consumers & Business customers
Better QOS required Redundancy in the network High quality Active equipment Additional services
– Targeted area• Cherry picking
One solution may be used• Global Coverage
Solution (s) for each area : urban, residential, rural…
– Targeted deployment rate• Slow
No problem with qualified workforce, technically complex solutions • Fast mass deployment
Shortage of qualified installers, simple solutions required Use as much as possible of pre-terminated products (Plug and play)
Data for Choice of Technical Solutions (CLIMATIC)
– Operational temperatures The components should cover all the range The cables should be stronger if required to withstand ice High UV resistance in sunny areas Active equipment might need a cooling in tropical areas
– Natural catastrophe risk In seismic areas opt for aerial solution In the areas of strong wind buried cables are better protected In potentially flooded area all components must have higher level of watertightness
Data for Choice of Technical Solutions (REGULATORY)
– Aesthetic Facades
Aerial Street Cabinets
– Network sharing Central office
POP Building
– Access to infrastructure Ducts
Pols Builduing
Technical Solutions
– Cable Infrastructure
– Fiber Concentration Points
– Street cabinets
Directly buried Ducts Aerial Façade
Street cabinets Sheltered racks Poleor underground closures
Case: Oise territory; rural and semi-rural greenfield
Mutltiple Potential Infrastructure to reuse
In red the territory of the OiseTHD FTTH network
~800 000 inhabitants, 6000 km2 (1/5 of Belgium size)
40
Design automation made possible to study multiple scenarios
45 Central Offices
25 Central Offices
Timeline of the project & use of tools
Works Track
Operator
Track
2013 2014 2015Fev 2013
RFP issued
Nov 2013
Supplier selected
Fev 2015
First SuscriberDec 2013
Operator selected
Design automation
PNI
Assistance to owner
Network Builder
Operator
Take away using design automation tool
• Using a Design Automation tool during the project brought the following benefits:
• Ability to test different scenarios with accuracy and on a short timeframe
• Accuracy on BOM and quantities
• Far less « guestimates » in the overall process
• Reuse of 5 infrastructure will not have been possible without the tool
• Time & resources spent on pre-studies reduced significantly (60% less)
• 30% decrease in planned costs for entire project (proven by agreement on fix price)
• Higher level benefits includes:
• The tool allowed to very early convince all stakeholders that realistic solutions were possible.
• The tool became the tool around which a trust was established among the stakeholders and became a vehicle for a
common understanding
• Different partners are responsible for part of the project creating a risk of divergence; the tool being able to design an
end-to-end network, maintained the overall coherency of the project
• Very convincing basis for financing bodies, leading to a better ease in obtaining the financing commitments.
• Prerequisites
• High-Level design should be seen has an investment not a cost !
• Investment in data should be made earlier than traditionally done to allow a precise decision-making
Planning phase what’s next ?
Failing to plan is programmed to fail
Geomarketing must be
the 1 st element of site
selection decision
process
Reliability of ground scale
population dataObtaining competitors
network positioning
Economic and administrative
characteristics of local areas
and development projects
identification
Customer potential within
marketing targets
(15 yo +)
+
Simulating access node
layout with its theoretical
coverage zone for potential
customers
Investments and ROI prediction
Sites rollout prioritization according
to budget capacity
Network dimensioning
according to traffic data
Data & Tools for Sustainable FTTH ProjectsPresented by:
Carl Denis : GiSmartware
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
The Agenda
• Workhop Program
• 13H00 – 14H30
Workshop introduction
Data & Tools in the planning/design phase
Main Speakers:
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 14H30 - 15H00 Coffee Break
• 15H00 – 15H45
Data & Tools in the building phase
Main Speakers:
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 15H45 – 16H30
Data & Tools in Operation and Maintenance
Trends on handling data & tools usage
Final wrap-up
Main Speakers:
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alain Meller: SETICS
The Problem
Full
Assessment FTTH
Engineering
rules
Master
planning
Survey
and High
Level
Design
Gap analysis &
Recommendation
HLD
Acceptance
Low
Level
Design
Review
LLD
Acceptance
Acceptance
tests
Network
Acceptance
Friendly
User Test
Final
HLD
Final
BoQFinal
LLD
Installation
Customers connection
Specifications
BoQIP Network &
Services
assessment
• From strategic maps to as built maps – what are & where are the differences ?
• How the processes and data’s life circles are changing according to the needs
Building phase key stakes and challenges
• Have the right strategy to deploy quickly and with the most cost efficient
model is very important due to the high Capex investment
• Be sure that the FTTH network will be installed with a strong level of
commitment Quality, Cost and Time wise
• Requires full alignment with marketing and other business units both within
operator and outside : service providers, vendors, government regulatory
and other authorities…
• How to find the right balance between business demand, fast rollout and
quality rollout?
• Which authorizations are required to lay cables into the streets?
Planning is done, BUT… real life begins
Network design : tangible “as build” is key factor of success
• Extra-cost, rollout delay, non conformity with standards can be anticipated and minimized during the
Network Design phase.
• The value added of network design will be to identify all potential issues impacting operator’s objectives and
to proactively anticipate solutions to minimize there impact on the overall FTTH project.
• Benefits of a network design :
• Secure quality of Build Vendors Design delivery: no extra cost during conception
• Savings on CAPEX :
Optimized Bill of Quantity and Bill of Material with full integrity
no extra cost during rollout
blocking point are anticipated and solved during design phase
• Savings on OPEX : operating stakes are taken into account in design
PROCESS & ACTORS
“as build” are also about Quality Assurance and compromise in real the world
• As a world wide best practice, Low level Designs are used as input and output to
• obtain work permits
• raised potential rollout blocking points due to on field context
• anticipate network re-arrangement (as copper network removal, pipes subducting)
• fine tuned engineering rules (splitters and cable splicing locations)
• The following iteration process described the two mains iterations loops between Sofrecom, Build vendors and
work permit authorities
LowLow LevelLevel
DesignDesignLowLow LevelLevel
DesignDesignWorkWork
PermitPermit
High High LevelLevel DesignDesign
Bill Of Bill Of MaterialMaterial
CostCost EstimationEstimation
On siteOn site
SurveySurveyWork PermitWork Permit
authoritiesauthorities
-- CostCost
-- StandardsStandards
-- PlanningPlanning
-- networknetwork
rere--arrangementarrangement
NO
ImplementationImplementation
NO
OPERATOR OPERATORBUILDER ASSETS OWNERS
BUILDER
Building Phase data landscape
PNI
CAD filesExcel files
GIS files Inventory base
CAD Tools & Excel’s sheetsPlanning & designing tools
BOM Invoices
Deploymentmaps
Detailed design documents
As Builtdocuments
Validation
Capture or import
Capture or import
Building Phase – Advantages & Drawbacks
Every builders have Excel and CAD tools
Time to market long after the end of construction
“Tunnel effect” on validation of the project
Coordination of several builders on the network
Data experts for checking and importing the documents produced
Building Phase
PNI
CAD filesExcel files
Inventory base
CAD Tools & Excel’s sheetsPlanning & designing tools
BOM
GIS files
Invoices
Deploymentmaps
Detailed design documents
Data exchange models
As BuiltdocumentsGIS files
import
Validation
Capture or import
Building Phase – Advantages & Drawbacks
Every builders have Excel and CAD tools
Data are imported rather than captured by hand
“Tunnel effect” on validation of the project
Coordination of several builders on the network
Exchange formats must be defined before
Building Phase
PNI
CAD filesExcel files
Inventory base
CAD Tools & Excel’s sheetsPlanning & designing tools
BOM Invoices
Deploymentmaps
Detailed design documents
As Builtdocuments
GIS files
Validation
Capture or import
Building Phase
PNI
CAD filesExcel files
Inventory base
CAD Tools & Excel’s sheetsPlanning & designing tools
BOM Invoices
Deploymentmaps
Detailed design documents
As Builtdocuments
Validation
Building Phase – Advantages & Drawbacks
No tunnel effectData are ready to be
exploded as soon as the build phase is over
Building phase coordinated
Builders must connect and populate the PNI
Building phase : focus on Customer experience
Deployment
1Building
commitment
2
Connection
3
Sales
4Customer
Installation
5
Customer care
6
Create KeepGet Buildings Get Subscribers
Architecture definition & field trial
Fiber deployment in the street and creation of potential addressable customer.
Direct real estate owner agreement or purchase to a 3rd party operator of the access right to a building with the real estate agreement.
Connection to its own internal fiber infrastructure in the building or installed by an alternative operator.
End user offers creation and sales
End user premises installation and services activation
End users loyalty development
Addressable housing Connectable housing Home-PassedEnd user contract
signatureEnd user
connectedCustomer database
data is accessible to Customer => real time processing data is key factor of differentiation
Building phase, what’s next ?
CRM All acquisition channels
FT
TH
Netw
ork
Managem
ent
FTTH Network Provisioning
Prov. Logistics
Order
Management
Workforce
Management
Elig
ibility
FT
TH
FTTH
Network
Land register
Building & owner
Network inventory
Capacity available /
used
Deployment plan
FTTH network
Customer’s
address
Whole
sale
Offe
r
FTTH Sales Strategy
Potential customers
management Inhabitants database
Building administrators
database
Building / flat
database
Buildings /
flatsVAS
FTTH
Authentication
FTTH
Map of
FTTH network
OLT /
DHCP
Data & Tools for Sustainable FTTH ProjectsPresented by:
Carl Denis : GiSmartware
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
The Agenda
• Workhop Program
• 13H00 – 14H30
Workshop introduction
Data & Tools in the planning/design phase
Main Speakers:
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 14H30 - 15H00 Coffee Break
• 15H00 – 15H45
Data & Tools in the building phase
Main Speakers:
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 15H45 – 16H30
Data & Tools in Operation and
Maintenance
Trends on handling data & tools
usage
Final wrap-up
Main Speakers:
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alain Meller: SETICS
Stakeholders & interests
Goals in Operation
phase
Customer satisfaction
Efficiency
Regulators
Reputation
Players in the value chain
User
Corporate customer
ISP
Operator of active network
Access network owner Contractor
Systems used in operation phase
Player
PNI (a.k.a. GIS/NIS/NLM/NI…)
OSS BSS Customer Support CRM Project mgm. Finance
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
• Calls from customers, alarm in OSS/monitoring system, report from field…
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
A small, radial network
As seen in an IP topology view
Connections are lost
Lost connections in the cable topology
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
Direct Customers
• The direct
customers are
normally easy to
find
• In an FTTH project
the majority are
probably Consumer
customers
What is happening on each fiber
1
P2P SDU
Internet,
IPTV
2
Dark Fiber
Local Government
Hospital connection
3
P2P SDU
Internet
4
Uplink MDU
12 ports
SLA3
5
Dark Fiber
B2B ISP
SLA1
6
Dark Fiber
Mobile Operator
SLA1
7
P2P SDU
Internet
8
P2P SDU
Health monitoring
SLA2
Internet
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
Cut cable case: Repairing
Prioritize the connections based on information in the whole chain
For higher level SLA, execute redundancy
options
Reprioritize the repairs after redundancy
options
Communicate across the whole
chain
Use case: Cut cable case
Detect the fault
Pinpoint the fault
Analyze the impact
Prioritize the repair
Verify reestablished operation
• Use the active network
• Direct contact with customers
Example: Swedish PTSFS 2015:2
•Assets
•Connectivity
•Connections, services, customers…
Network must be correctly documented
•Classified according to – what is the impact if this asset breaks?
•How many customers (and what kind of customers) depend on this asset
(Impact) classification ofnetwork assets (cables,
switches, connections…)
•Defined processes (work flow, management, organisation…) for restoring service
•Plans for regular quality inspections and other QA mechanisms
•Redundancy and fault tolerance (also including UPS etc.)
•Vulnerability and risk analysis
Asset classes and asset categories leads to
Aggregation of classifications (1)
Class A
Class BClass C
Class C Class CClass B
Class CClass C
Class C
Class DClass D
Class BClass B
Class B
Class D
Class CClass D
Conclusions
The network owner operates in a
complex value chain
Many end users are users of customers
of customers
The information needed to make good decisions resides in many
systems
And not necessarily in the same kind of system throughout
the value chain
Total system integration will never
be feasable
But information must be shared one
way or another
Fiber networks are, and will be treated
as, chriticalinfrastructure and chritical services
Regulation bodies will be more active
and will have requirements
The Agenda
Workshop Program
• 13H00 – 14H30
– Workshop introduction
– Data & Tools in the planning/design phaseMain Speakers:
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Alain Meller: SETICS
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 14H30 - 15H00 Coffee Break
• 15H00 – 15H45
– Data & Tools in the building phaseMain Speakers:
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alexi Gekht: ACOME
Bertrand Rondeau : SOFRECOM
• 15H45 – 16H30
Data & Tools in Operation and Maintenance
Trends on handling data & tools usage
Final wrap-up
Main Speakers:
Anders Flodin: DIGPRO
Carl Denis : Gismartware
Alain Meller: SETICS
Trends on tools usages
• GIS-based systems over CAD-systems
• PNI used earlier than befoire in late design and building phases
• Raise of the design automation software category
• Site survey tools coupled with PNI
Trends on handling data
Sharing data along the project lifecycle and among the stakeholders: difficulties
How to deal with multi sourced data (vendors, installers, municipality, infrastructure provider (other
operator?) :
GIS standards ? Library ? Nomenclature? Process as ITOM?
how to avoid doubloon? Mismatch database ?
- an example the Gr@ceTHD attempt to normalise data
- Existing « standard in other domain e.g. utilities)