Data Revolution: Instruction and Index 4 Region 4 ESC.
28
Data Revolution: Instruction and Index 4 Region 4 ESC
-
Upload
corey-perry -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Data Revolution: Instruction and Index 4 Region 4 ESC.
Data Revolution: Instruction and Index 4
Region 4 ESC
Richard A. Blair, Sr. Education SpecialistAccountability and Leadership Solutions713.744.6596 [email protected] Starr, Education SpecialistReading/Language Arts and Social Studies Solutions713.744.8184 [email protected]
Presenters
Sherry Olivares, Education SpecialistMathematics Solutions713.744.6330 [email protected]
Tony Goedicke, Education SpecialistSpecial Education Solutions713.744.6579 [email protected]
Presenters
AM AgendaWelcome and IntroductionsQuick Review of Indexes 1-3Scale Scores vs. Raw Score vs. Percentage ScoresIndex 4 OverviewQuestions
SCALE SCORESWhy can’t I just use percentage scores?
Key Concepts (Tan/Michel, ETS, 2011.)
Raw Score – the total number of raw score points a test taker earns from taking a test, usually based on the number of correct answers.
Key Concepts (Tan/Michel, ETS, 2011.)
Percent Score – The percentage of questions the test taker got correct based on the number of questions on the test.
Key Concepts (Tan/Michel, ETS, 2011.)Scaled Score - Scores that have been mathematically transformed from one set of numbers (i.e., the raw score) to another set of numbers in order to make them comparable in some way —for example, across differenteditions, or “forms,” of thesame test
Raw vs. Scaled ScoresForm A more difficult than Form B.
INDEX 4 – POSTSECONDARY READINESS
2014-2015 State Accountability System
Index 4 ConstructionAll Campuses and LEAs
• STAAR FINAL Level II Standard• Two or More Tests• If student only takes one test, must meet FINAL Level II
on that test• Enrolled Snapshot, Leaves, Tests = Accountability for
Campus• Enrolled Snapshot, Leaves, Tests elsewhere = No
Accountability for Campus
• Elementary and Middle Schools/others without Graduation Rate• Only Measure• Higher than Met Standard
Student GroupsSTAAR Postsecondary Readiness Standard —Student Groups Evaluated: Eight student groups are evaluated.
All students Seven racial/ethnic groups: African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and Two or More Races
Group SizeAll Students – 10 studentsStudent Groups – 25 students
Calculation – from 2014 Accountability Manual
Index 4 ConstructionHigh Schools and others with Graduation Rate•STAAR FINAL Level II Standard (25%)•Graduation Rate (25%)•Graduation Plan (25%)•Postsecondary Readiness Indicators •Reading/Language Arts AND Math (25%)•TAKS•SAT•ACT
Why is it Important for My Campus?• College Ready instruction doesn’t start in high school.• College Readiness starts in Elementary School
Dropouts – from TEA, 2012-13 Completion Reporting
Calculations http://home.escweb.net/sites/acs/default.aspx
2015 RECOMMENDATIONS
ATAC Recommendations: These are NOT final!
2013 and 2014
Index 1 Index 2
Index 3 Index 4 ELL Inclusion
Reviewed InclusionTEA Staff Reviewed Assmt. Changes and how it can affect 2015 Accountability.
Include new STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 results in Index calculations
Hold Harmless Provision
Exclude new Assmts.
Evaluate based on available progress measures
Exclude New Assmts.
Discussing further modifications
No changes to STAAR methodology
Exclude New Assmts.
New Options
ELL workgroup recommendations for policies for the inclusion of ELLs
1 2 3
4 5 6
From Dec 8-9 ATAC Meeting Notes.
ATAC Recommendations Nothing is final, yet!
Index 1 &2Index 1 or 2 to determine accountability ratings
3 Indexes for Met Standard
Index 2 & 3Investigate cut score targets rather than percentile targets
Required ImprovementNot apply RI for 2015 based on inability to compare from prior years
Index 4Additional components for districts and campuses
Foundation HS Program Inclusion
1 2 3 4
From Dec 8-9 ATAC Meeting Notes.
Current Year Preliminary RecommendationsGrad Rate – Include FHSP graduates in Grad Rate NumeratorGrad Plan – Exclude FHSP graduates in Grad Plan Denominator FHSP grads cannot receive an endorsement for 2013-142016 and 2017Development of an integrated diploma plan indicator that will span RHAP/DAP and FHSP
2018 and BeyondFHSP Only
Workgroup formed to develop recommendation for transitioning to future TSI requirements
From Dec 8-9 ATAC Meeting Notes.
.
Foundation High School Program
Modify Advanced Course/Dual EnrollmentMeasure only grades 11 and 12
Additional Indicators DiscussedCTE Course CompletionIndustry CertificationCTE Graduate ConcentratorGraduates who Attend Higher Ed
Fifth Component for Campuses & DistrictsEqual WeightingTwo Options
From Dec 8-9 ATAC Meeting Notes.
Index 4 Considerations
ATAC Index 4 Options Discussed
Option 2: Create a Single Indicator of the Percent of Annual Graduates for the 2013-14 School Year
From Dec 8-9 ATAC Meeting Notes.
Accountability Questions
27
Your feedback is important, and we are
committed to exceeding your expectations!
Accountability & Leadership Solutions Department:
Please take a moment to complete the electronic evaluation of this session. If you have any questions,
comments, or suggestions, please contact me at [email protected] or 713.744.6596.
This Heart = Our
Commitment to You
Upcoming No-Cost Sessions•Session 1115313 Formative Assessment in the Elementary Mathematics Classroom 2/25, Room 100D
•Session 1115315 Formative Assessment in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom 3/3, Room 113A
