Data Dashboard Part 1 NJ STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND …

1

NJ STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND SCHOOL

PERFORMANCE REPORT

OCTOBER 6, 2016

2015-2016 Data Dashboard

Part 1

2

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DASHBOARD

Fall presentation Spring Presentation

SAT Scores SAT, ACT, AP, & PARCC comparative data

ACT Scores GPA Data

Advanced Placement Scores Final Grades

PARCC Scores Student Participation

“IF WE SAY WE ARE A HIGH PERFORMING DISTRICT, HOW DO WE KNOW?”

The focus of this presentation will be to compare our scores to previous years. The presentation in the spring will follow the release of data used to

compare our scores within our data dashboard.

Historical comparison of SAT/ACT/AP Scores

3

Governor Livingston High School

Trending Up Relatively Stable Trending Down

SAT 1 SCORES-CLASS OF 2016 4

After showing improvements the past two years, our scores dropped 22 points mirroring the state scoring drop of 19 points


An examination of the historical SAT Scores by Section shows a decline in the writing and critical reading sections of the old SAT.

ACT SCORES

6

GLHS ACT scores show gains against state and national averages.

8

ACT SCORES

7

Historical ACT Scores by section shows gains in almost all areas.

9

AP-ADVANCED PLACEMENT EXAMS - PARTICIPATION

2013 2014 2015 2016

GL # AP Test Takers 206 190 214 229

# of AP Test Administered 530 531 622 602

% of 11 & 12 taking AP

test38.4 38.1 43.9 44.6

# of students with 3+ 175 165 185 200

8

GLHS continues to grow in student participation in the AP program while maintaining student achievement on these exams.

AP-ADVANCED PLACEMENT EXAMS

2013 2014 2015 2016

% of students earning 3 or better on an AP exam

% GL AP Students 85.0 86.8 86.4 87.3

% NJ AP Students 74.6 74.2 72.8 71.8

% Nat’l AP Students 60.9 61.3 60.7 60.2

9

GLHS scores on the rise compared to declining state/national performance

AP-ADVANCED PLACEMENT EXAMS

Score 2013 2014 2015 2016

5 31% 27% 25% 27%

4 32% 31% 27% 35%

3 21% 25% 29% 26%

2 9% 11% 15% 11%

1 7% 6% 4% 3%

Passing Rate % 84% 83% 81% 87%

National Passing Rate % 59% 59% 58% 57%

10

Overall, student scoring has improved while encouraging increased participation in the AP program

AP SCORE COMPARISONS PASSING RATE

11

The passing rate exceeds 80% in 19 of the 22 AP subjects offered at GLHS!

13

AP SCORE COMPARISONS SCORING AVERAGE

12

The scoring average is 3.0 or better for 20 of 22 AP courses offered at GLHS!

14

AP SCORE COMPARISONS SOCIAL STUDIES PASSING RATES

13

The passing rate for Social Studies remains consistently high and reflects improvement in the AP Econ courses.

15

AP SCORE COMPARISONS WORLD LANGUAGE PASSING RATES

14

AP World Languages remain a focus area for improvement. The honors track for these courses were launched in Sept. and will expand again next year.

16

AP SCORE COMPARISONS ENGLISH PASSING RATES

15

AP English scores remain outstanding! Currently exploring AP Potential to identify additional students for these courses.

AP SCORE COMPARISONS MATH PASSING RATES

16

AP Math scores working toward greater consistency in achievement. AP Calculus BC hits 100% passing again!

18

AP SCORE COMPARISONS SCIENCE PASSING RATES

17

AP Science scores continue to be a strength. Physics 1 and 2 (new in 2015) improved significantly in year 2!

19

◼ SAT scores decreased by 22 points mirroring a similar decrease in the state average.

◼ ACT scores improved relative to historical data, as well as, state and national averages.

◼ The AP program continues to demonstrate healthy growth in student participation and student achievement.

18

SUMMARY

◼ What’s next▪ ACT test has been included in the SAT test prep offering. The

high school has begun plans to offer the PreACT test to provide students additional exposure to college entrance exams. PSAT still offered to all students Grades 9-11 at GLHS.

▪ Ongoing roll out of honors level World Language program to include level 1, 2, & 3 for the 2017-18 school year.

▪ Expand the use of AP Potential to increase access and preparation for the AP program.

▪ Expanded AP offerings to include AP Music Theory and AP Environmental Studies

▪ Identification of future AP offerings and courses supporting the STEM initiatives

19

SUMMARY

2015-16 District PARCC Scores

20

Berkeley Heights Public Schools

◼ In 2014, New Jersey adopted the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) to replace HSPA & ASK and assess the Common Core State Standards.

◼ Students took English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA) in grades 3 – 11 as well as Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

◼ In 2015-16, PARCC testing was changed to a single window that took place through April and May.

◼ Computer-based assessments▪ More interactive with student▪ Built-in student accommodations and tools

◼ Students were asked to complete more complex critical-thinking questions that asked them to justify their work and explain their reasoning.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

21

PARCC Performance levels

HOW IS STUDENT PERFORMANCE SCORED ON PARCC TESTS?

22

Not yet meeting

grade-level expectations

Partially meeting

grade-level expectations

Approaching grade-level

expectations

Meeting grade-level

expectations

Exceeding grade-level

expectations

Measuring College and Career Readiness

PARCC RESULTS: YEAR TWO

BERKELEY HEIGHTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

23

24

PARCC SCORING SUMMARY-ELA

25

PARCC SCORING SUMMARY-MATH

% Not Yet Meeting(Level 1)

% PartiallyMeeting(Level 2)

% ApproachingExpectations

(Level 3)

%Meeting

Expectations(Level 4)

%Exceeding

Expectation (Level 5)

% >=

Level 4

Grade 3 BH-2016 3 8 23 54 12 66

Grade 3 BH-2015 3 6 19 61 10 71

Grade 4 BH-2016 1 4 24 51 20 71

Grade 4 BH-2015 4 2 16 53 25 78

Grade 5 BH-2016 3 4 12 72 10 82

Grade 5 BH-2015 2 3 13 64 17 81

PARCC GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISONSENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

26

The elementary ELA passing rate declined slightly from the 2015 test in grades 3 & 4




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 3 BH-2016 2 7 13 50 28 78

Grade 3 BH-2015 2 5 16 60 18 78

Grade 4 BH-2016 1 2 20 64 12 76

Grade 4 BH-2015 4 7 18 59 13 72

Grade 5 BH-2016 2 6 12 59 21 80

Grade 5 BH-2015 2 6 16 53 23 76

PARCC GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISONSMATHEMATICS

27

◼ Our students at the elementary level far surpassed the PARCC and State proficiency rates (identified as 4 or 5)

◼ Year 1 to Year 2 findings:▪ Math: Continue with multi-step word problems. In addition the focus

areas of Number and Operation in Base 10 and Measurements and Data.

▪ ELA: Need ongoing exposure to literature and informational texts with student using paired texts to compare and contrast or identify patterns.

◼ What’s next?▪ Data Meetings: incorporating multiple measures to support students▪ Professional development, collaboration, ongoing differentiation of

instruction▪ Exploring math instruction, math support and elementary

scheduling as part of Strategic Plan

OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS28




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 6-2016 1 8 11 47 33 80

Grade 6-2015 6 5 31 44 15 59

Grade 7-2016 4 4 14 38 40 78

Grade 7-2015 3 11 17 35 34 69

Grade 8-2016 4 7 19 52 18 70

Grade 8-2015 9 6 16 49 21 70


29




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 6 BH-2016 4 6 15 43 32 75

Grade 6 BH-2015 4 9 33 45 9 54

Grade 7 BH-2016 5 6 31 54 6 60

Grade 7 BH-2015 3 16 39 41 1 42

Grade 8 BH-2016 18 32 31 19 0 19

Grade 8 BH-2015 21 19 38 22 0 22

PARCC GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISONSMATHEMATICS

30

◼ While ELA is tested by grade levels from 3-11 grade, math is assessed from grades 3-8 but students are assessed in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II in the year in which they take the course regardless of their grade level.

◼ 97% of NJ 7th graders took the grade 7 math assessment as compared to 88% of Berkeley Heights 7th graders.

◼ 64% of NJ 8th graders took the grade 8 math assessment as compared to 35% of Berkeley Heights 8th graders.

MATH ASSESSMENTS

% of students taking

Grade Level Math Algebra 1 Geometry Algebra 2

Grade 7 88% 10% 0.5% 1%

Grade 8 35% 42% 23% 1%

Grade 9 DNA 47% 29% 19%

Grade 10 DNA 5% 36% 40%

Grade 11 DNA 1% 6% 36%

31

◼ Our students at the middle school level far surpassed the PARCC and State proficiency rates and showed significant improvement from Year 1.

◼ Year 1 to Year 2 findings:▪ Math: Evidence statement analysis helped identify targeted skills that

will require focused instruction to build the foundation for pre-algebra and algebra

▪ ELA: The evidence statements show a common need for further focus using cross-curricular informational texts.

◼ What’s Next?▪ Variety of ELA resources focused upon vocabulary and increasing

reading comprehension across all academic areas▪ Expanded teacher contact time in math and ELA for Grade 7 students.▪ MathSpace has been expanded to target these skills in 7/8th grade

mathematics and Algebra 1 from our pilot groups.▪ STEM related activities will be included in our present “cycle” classes

and plans for next year include an expansion of offerings.





(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 9-2016 4 10 25 41 20 61

Grade 9-2015 8 8 19 39 26 65

Grade 10-2016 11 12 16 35 25 60

Grade 10-2015 12 10 17 32 28 60

Grade 11-2016 14 15 18 38 14 52

Grade 11-2015 6 15 21 37 21 58


33




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Alg. 1 BH-2016 7 12 23 53 6 59

Alg. 1 BH-2015 6 20 27 46 1 47

Geom. BH-2016 3 16 36 37 8 45

Geom. BH-2015 5 17 36 33 8 41

Alg. 2-2016 18 13 21 42 6 48

Alg. 2-2015 20 20 19 40 1 41

PARCC COURSE-LEVEL COMPARISONSMATHEMATICS

34

◼ District scores in math improved from 2015 with a slight decline in ELA 9 and ELA 11. A decline in high school participation rates impacts the ability to compare our scores from 2015 to 2016.

◼ Year 1 to Year 2 findings:▪ Math: Evidence statement analysis demonstrates a need for continued

emphasis placed on modeling and reasoning for Alg1, Geo and Alg 2.▪ ELA: As identified in the Evidence Statement Reports, focus must remain on an

analysis of nonfiction (Informational text, Science/Tech articles, and historical documents) text materials.

◼ What’s next?▪ New nonfiction titles added to grades 10 &11, incorporating a variety of new

electronic resources that require critical-thinking skills similar to PARCC▪ Grade 10 English reworked curriculum to develop a stronger correlation with

Social Studies-Grade 11 will follow similar model this year ▪ Continued emphasis on Algebra 1 as the foundation for other math courses▪ Expanding use of Mathspace to help target instruction for Algebra 1 students


PARCC SCORES AND UPDATED GRADUATION PATHWAYS

36

Impact on Class of 2017, 18 & 19❏ Our current sophs, juniors, & seniors may use the menu of graduation

pathways listed on the previous slide❏ Only need one from the menu for ELA and one from the menu for Math❏ Our guidance counselors will be working with our students and tracking

their completion of this graduation requirementImpact on Class of 2020❏ Our current freshman will have access to this menu of graduation pathways❏ However, they are only able to use these alternative pathways if they take

every PARCC test that they are eligible to take from this year forwardImpact on Class of 2021 and beyond❏ Beginning with our current 8th graders, all students will have to pass

Algebra 1 and ELA 10 to meet the graduation requirement❏ The process for remediation and retakes is not clearly defined to date.

Students who do not meet any of the pathways may graduate through the NJ DOE Portfolio Appeals process

37

KEY TAKEAWAYS: PARCC SCORES AND GRADUATION PATHWAYS

◼ Year 2 of the PARCC assessments gave us more timely information that can be analyzed to support students and improve the delivery of instruction.

◼ Teachers are reviewing 2 years of PARCC scores in conjunction with other assessments to make informed classroom decisions that will support student growth.

◼ Grade levels and courses are developing plans that address any of the areas of concern that are identified through evidence statements and item analysis reports.

◼ Support the remediation of students who have been identified as needing targeted interventions at a variety of different instructional levels

HOW WILL OUR DISTRICT USE THESE RESULTS TO DRIVE INSTRUCTION AND HELP OUR STUDENTS?

38

◼Ongoing professional development on the interpretation and analysis of data

◼ Expansion of Data team meetings focused upon individual student needs and sharing best practices/strategies for instruction.

◼ Focus upon the use of formative assessment as a diagnostic tool to inform instruction and increase feedback

◼ Identification of curricular resources that will support identified needs in mathematics and English Language Arts

HOW WILL OUR DISTRICT USE THESE RESULTS TO DRIVE INSTRUCTION AND HELP OUR STUDENTS?

39

Questions?

40

Appendix

2015-2016

41


42


43


44

2013 2014 2015 2016

GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l

Critical Reading 542 499 496 541 501 497 551 500 495 539 495 494

Math 567 522 514 565 523 513 565 521 511 563 514 508

Writing 545 500 488 551 502 487 547 499 484 539 492 482

GLHS Total 1654 1657 1663 1641

NJ Total 1521 1526 1520 1501

Nat'l Total 1498 1497 1490 1484


The GLHS SAT average has gained ground in relation to the state average over the past four years (140 points).

ACT SCORES

2013 2014 2015 2016

GL Participation148 Test Takers

54.0%132 Test Takers



60.9%

GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l GL NJ Nat'l

Composite Score 24.2 23.0 20.9 25.2 23.1 21.0 24.5 23.2 21.0 25.2 23.1 20.8

English 23.6 22.5 20.2 25.2 22.8 20.3 24.3 22.9 20.4 24.9 22.7 20.1

Math 25.0 23.6 20.9 25.6 23.7 20.9 24.8 23.7 20.8 25.0 23.3 20.6

Reading 24.1 23.1 21.1 25.0 23.1 21.3 24.6 23.3 21.4 25.6 23.5 21.3

Science 23.7 22.2 20.7 24.3 22.4 20.8 24.1 22.6 20.9 24.8 22.5 20.846

GLHS scores improve again and exceed state and national averages.

7

AP SCORE COMPARISONS

AP Exams Administered at GLHS % of Grades 3 or higher Test Score Average

TEST In Class Total Tests GL NJ Nat’l GL NJ Nat’l

English Language 51 51 98.0 74.3 55.2 4.04 3.38 2.81

English Literature 52 36 97.2 67.1 54.4 3.81 3.07 2.75

European History 22 21 95.2 67.8 52.3 4.05 3.10 2.70

Micro-Economics 49 39 97.4 68.6 65.7 4.10 3.17 3.04

Macro-Economics 48 40 82.5 66.4 55.6 3.88 3.23 2.84

US History 88 89 87.6 68.8 52.4 3.66 3.22 2.70

47

Overall performance in English and SS remains high. AP Econ scores improved from previous years.

2013 2014 2015 2016

Tests

% pass

Avg. Score

Tests%

passAvg. Score

Tests%

passAvg. Score

Tests % passAvg. Score

English Language 46 98 4.15 33 97 4.09 44 98 4.23 51 98 4.04

English Literature 56 96 3.91 44 95 3.89 43 95 3.47 36 97 3.81

European History 48 92 3.69 42 88 3.60 43 95 3.58 21 95 4.05

Micro- Economics 44 89 3.95 40 80 3.43 52 77 3.33 39 97 4.10

Macro- Economics 47 94 4.04 52 77 3.23 63 57 2.89 40 83 3.88

US History 64 86 3.77 58 93 4.09 66 86 3.73 89 88 3.66

48

HISTORICAL AP COMPARISONS

AP SCORE COMPARISONSAP populations of less than 5 have been redacted to protect student privacy



Art-2D 2 1 100.0 84.7 82.2 3.00 3.51 3.41

Art Drawing 2 1 100.0 89.6 82.6 4.00 3.66 3.40

French Language 11 3 100.0 74.9 74.7 4.67 3.23 3.25

Spanish Language 54 30 36.7 89.9 89.3 2.53 3.80 3.77

Italian 19 2 100.0 66.3 70.9 3.00 2.92 3.22

Latin 4 4 25.0 55.3 65.6 2.25 2.85 3.00

49

World Language AP scores are still an area of concern. This year marks the beginning of course revisions that includes creation of honors track.

2013 2014 2015 2016


Tests%

passAvg. Score

Tests%

passAvg. Score

Tests%

passAvg. Score

Art-2D 0 DNA DNA 2 100 3.50 1 100 4.00 1 100 3.00

Art Drawing 1 100 5.00 2 100 3.00 4 100 4.00 1 100 4.00

French Language 4 75 3.00 8 63 2.63 6 83 2.83 3 100 4.67

Spanish Language 22 18 1.77 27 48 2.48 21 52 2.81 30 37 2.53

Italian 8 50 2.88 8 50 2.50 12 25 2.17 2 100 3.00

Latin 9 56 2.56 4 50 3.00 4 100 3.25 4 25 2.25

50

HISTORICAL AP COMPARISONSAP populations of less than 5 have been redacted to protect student privacy

AP SCORE COMPARISONS



Calculus AB 45 46 82.6 70.4 59.0 3.54 3.38 2.94

Calculus BC 16 16 100 88.3 81.5 4.88 4.16 3.81

Comp Sci 29 26 92.3 71.9 63.8 4.00 3.27 3.01

Statistics 47 44 93.2 74.0 60.4 3.86 3.29 2.86

Biology 25 24 83.3 72.0 60.8 3.5 3.14 2.84

Chemistry 29 29 89.7 65.6 52.2 3.48 3.04 2.64

Physics C Mechanics 21 20 90.0 81.6 76.3 4.40 3.77 3.54

Physics C: E & M 21 8 100.0 74.9 69.1 4.38 3.65 3.44

Physics 1 57 57 84.2 45.9 38.3 3.30 2.50 2.29

Physics 2 16 9 66.7 60.1 59.3 3.00 2.87 2.83

51

Math and Science scores continue to be strong. AP Physics 1 and 2 made large strides in a positive direction from last year.

2013 2014 2015 2016

Tests % pass

Avg. Score


Tests%

passAvg. Score

Tests%

passAvg. Score

Calculus AB 55 58 2.96 48 60 3.17 43 91 4.02 46 83 3.54

Calculus BC 15 100 4.93 17 100 5.00 18 100 4.94 16 100 4.88

Comp Sci 13 100 4.23 16 69 3.19 11 91 4.09 26 92 4.00

Statistics 33 97 4.27 44 98 4.05 44 93 3.98 44 93 3.86

Biology 22 95 3.55 22 91 3.55 15 80 3.27 24 83 3.50

Chemistry 18 83 4.11 17 88 4.06 32 100 3.72 29 90 3.48Physics C: E

& M 1 100 5.00 9 56 2.89 2 100 5.00 8 100 4.38

Physics C Mechanics

21 71 3.43 35 94 3.77 16 88 3.81 20 90 4.40

Physics 1 DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 61 67 3.15 57 84 3.30

Physics 2 DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 15 7 2.00 9 67 3.00

52

HISTORICAL AP COMPARISONSAP populations of less than 5 have been redacted to protect student privacy

AP SCORE REPORTS-AP SCHOLARS

School Scholar Report-2016

AP Scholar AP Scholar with Honor

AP Scholar with Distinction

National AP Scholar

Number of Scholars 41 24 45 17

Average Score 3.42 3.74 4.34 4.62

53

110 of GL AP students earned recognition from the College Board for their achievement on these exams. These students average 4.14 on all of their tests

combined!

AP SCHOLAR EXPLANATION

The AP Program offers several AP Scholar Awards to recognize high school students who have demonstrated college-level achievement through AP courses and exams. Although there is no monetary award in addition to receiving an award certificate, this achievement is acknowledged on any score report that is sent to colleges the following fall.

Award levels•AP Scholar: Granted to students who receive scores of 3 or higher on three or more AP Exams •AP Scholar with Honor: Granted to students who receive an average score of at least 3.25 on all AP Exams taken, and scores of 3 or higher on four or more of these exams •AP Scholar with Distinction: Granted to students who receive an average score of at least 3.5 on all AP Exams taken, and scores of 3 or higher on five or more of these exams •National AP Scholar: Granted to students in the United States who receive an average score of at least 4 on all AP Exams taken, and scores of 4 or higher on eight or more of these exams

54

LINKS TO ADDITIONAL PARCC RESOURCES FOR

PARENTS

55

WHAT IS AN EVIDENCE STATEMENT?

◼ Evidence statements describe the knowledge and skills that a test question/item elicits from students. Each test question is coded to a specific evidence statement.

◼ Evidence Statement Tables show student performance by question relative to other students in the PARCC consortium, NJ, and school throughout the district. The table breaks down the data into a question by question item analysis.

◼ From this information, schools can identify specific content standards and skills that may need to be addressed.

◼ It is then possible to find released test questions that are connected to the identified standard and work with teachers and students to improve instruction in this area moving forward.

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

http://understandthescore.org/

57



WHAT DO THE INDIVIDUAL SCORE REPORTS (ISR) TELL US?

58

ELA SCORINGWHAT ARE MASTER CLAIMS & SUB-CLAIMS?

59

MATH SCORINGWHAT ARE MASTER CLAIMS & SUB-CLAIMS?

60

ADDITIONAL PARENT RESOURCES


61

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR PARENTS


62



HOW TO HELP YOUR CHILD


63






(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 3 BH 3 8 23 54 12 66

Grade 3 NJ 13 16 23 41 6 47

Grade 3 PARCC 19 18 23 36 4 40

Grade 4 BH 1 4 24 51 20 71

Grade 4 NJ 8 13 25 41 13 54

Grade 4 PARCC 12 18 27 35 9 44

Grade 5 BH 3 4 12 72 10 82

Grade 5 NJ 7 15 25 46 7 53

Grade 5 PARCC 11 20 27 38 4 42

2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMESENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

64

%Not Yet Meeting(Level 1)

%PartiallyMeeting(Level 2)

%ApproachingExpectations

(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >= Level

4

Grade 3 BH 2 7 13 50 28 78

Grade 3 NJ 8 16 24 39 13 52

Grade 3 PARCC 12 19 25 34 10 44

Grade 4 BH 1 2 20 64 12 76

Grade 4 NJ 8 19 27 41 5 46

Grade 4 PARCC 13 23 26 33 4 37

Grade 5 BH 2 6 12 59 21 80

Grade 5 NJ 6 18 28 38 9 47

Grade 5 PARCC 11 23 28 32 6 38

2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMESMATHEMATICS

65




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >= Level

4

Grade 6 BH 1 8 11 47 33 80

Grade 6 NJ 7 14 26 41 11 52

Grade 6 PARCC 11 19 29 35 6 41

Grade 7 BH 4 4 14 38 40 78

Grade 7 NJ 10 13 22 36 21 57

Grade 7 PARCC 14 18 25 31 13 44

Grade 8 BH 4 7 19 52 18 70

Grade 8 NJ 10 13 22 41 15 56

Grade 8 PARCC 14 17 25 36 9 45


66




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >= Level

4

Grade 6 BH 4 6 15 43 32 75

Grade 6 NJ 9 19 29 36 7 43

Grade 6 PARCC 13 24 29 29 5 34

Grade 7 BH 5 6 31 54 6 60

Grade 7 NJ 9 20 32 33 5 38

Grade 7 PARCC 12 25 33 27 4 31

Grade 8 BH 18 32 31 19 0 19

Grade 8 NJ 22 25 28 25 1 26

Grade 8 PARCC 23 24 23 25 4 29

2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMESMATHEMATICS

*Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment while in middle school. PARCC Math 7 & 8 outcomes are not representative of grade level performance as a whole.

67




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >=

Level 4

Grade 9 BH 4 10 25 41 20 61

Grade 9 NJ 13 15 23 35 13 48

Grade 9 PARCC 16 19 25 31 8 39

Grade 10 BH 11 12 16 35 25 60

Grade 10 NJ 22 14 20 30 13 43

Grade 10 PARCC 24 15 20 28 12 40

Grade 11 BH 14 15 18 38 14 52

Grade 11 NJ 19 18 23 31 8 39

Grade 11 PARCC 19 19 24 31 8 39


68




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >= Level

4

Algebra I BH 7 12 23 53 6 59

Algebra I NJ 13 21 25 37 4 41

Algebra I PARCC 15 26 26 31 2 33

Geometry BH 3 16 36 37 8 45

Geometry NJ 10 31 31 23 4 27

Geometry PARCC 11 31 31 24 3 27

Algebra II BH 18 13 21 42 6 48

Algebra II NJ 34 23 19 23 2 25

Algebra II PARCC 34 24 20 21 2 23

2016 PARCC COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMESMATHEMATICS

69




(Level 3)

%Meeting


%Exceeding


% >= Level 4

Algebra I CMS 0 3 11 74 12 86

Algebra I GLHS 13 20 33 35 0 35

Algebra I District 7 12 23 53 6 59

Algebra I NJ 13 21 25 37 4 41

Geometry CMS 0 2 4 55 38 93

Geometry GLHS 4 20 44 32 0 32

Geometry District 3 16 36 37 8 45

Geometry NJ 10 31 31 23 4 27

2016 PARCC COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMESMATHEMATICS-BY SCHOOL


70

Grade 3 %

>= Level 4

Grade 4 %

>= Level 4

Grade 5 %

>= Level 4

Grade 6 % >=

Level 4

Grade 7 % >= Level 4

Grade 8 % >= Level 4

Grade 9 %

>= Level 4

Grade 10 %

>= Level 4

Grade 11 %

>= Level 4

Mountain Park 68 60 85

T. P. Hughes 58 76 80

W. Woodruff 70 77 78

Columbia 80 78 70

GLHS 61 60 52

District 66 71 82 80 78 70 61 60 52

NJ 47 54 53 52 57 56 48 43 39

2016 PARCC SCHOOL & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMESENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

71

2016 PARCC SCHOOL & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS

Grade 3 % >=

Level 4

Grade 4 % >=

Level 4

Grade 5 % >=

Level 4

Grade 6 % >=

Level 4

Grade 7 % >=

Level 4

Grade 8 % >=

Level 4

Algebra I % >=

Level 4

Geometry % >=

Level 4

Algebra II % >=

Level 4

Mountain Park 76 70 80

T. P. Hughes 88 82 84

W. Woodruff 70 76 76

Columbia 75 60 19 86 93

GLHS 35 32 47

District 78 76 80 75 60 19 59 45 48

NJ 52 46 47 43 38 26 41 27 25


72

School Participating % over 1550 Composite Reading Math Writing

NVR - Demarest*

Pascack Valley*

Governor Livingston 1641 539 563 539

Rumson-Fair Haven Reg.

River Dell Regional*

Pascack Hills*

New Providence

Cranford*

Madison

Ramsey*

West Essex

Tenafly

Sparta*

Westfield*

James Caldwell*

Hopewell Valley Central*

Chatham*

Summit

Robbinsville *

Millburn*

School Performance Report Data

Coming Soon

Spring, 2017

73

SAT Scores-Class of 2016

School Enrollment DFG % ACT School % PSATParticipating Participating

West Essex# 1,086 I New Providence

Ramsey* 924 I Chatham* #

Governor Livingston 1,000 I Ramsey*

Chatham* # 1,202 J West Essex#

Westfield*# 1,824 I Rumson-Fair Haven Reg.#

Pascack Hills*# 818 I Madison

Rumson-Fair Haven Reg.# 913 J James Caldwell*

Robbinsville * 896 I Governor Livingston

Pascack Valley*# 1,239 I Westfield*#

James Caldwell* 793 I Pascack Valley*#

Millburn* 1,531 J Pascack Hills*#

Hopewell Valley Central*# 1,234 I Hopewell Valley Central*#

Sparta*# 1,209 I NVR - Demarest*#

Cranford* 1,163 I Sparta*#

River Dell Regional*# 1,085 I River Dell Regional*#

Madison 840 I Millburn*

Summit 1,192 I Summit

NVR - Demarest*# 1,243 I Tenafly

New Providence 646 I Cranford*

Tenafly 1,160 I Robbinsville *


Coming Soon

Spring, 2017

74

ACT and PSAT

School Enrollment DFG % taking 1 or more % tests >=3

Millburn* 1,531 J test in E,M,SS,SHopewell Valley Central*# 1,234 I Pascack Hills*# 818 I Chatham* # 1,202 J Westfield*# 1,824 ITenafly 1,160 ISummit 1,192 I New Providence 646 IRumson-Fair Haven Reg.# 913 JPascack Valley*# 1,239 I Ramsey* 924 I Governor Livingston 1,000 I James Caldwell* 793 I Madison 840 IWest Essex# 1,086 I River Dell Regional*# 1,085 I Cranford* 1,163 I Robbinsville * 896 ISparta*# 1,209 I NVR - Demarest*# 1,243 I


Coming Soon

Spring, 2017

75

AP-Advanced Placement Exams

Data Dashboard Part 1 NJ STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND …

Documents

Transcript of Data Dashboard Part 1 NJ STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND …