Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in...

18
Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston 1

Transcript of Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in...

Page 1: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Data Challenges in Evaluating the

Patient Engagement, Quality and

Safety of Mobile Health Applications

David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine,

Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston

1

Page 2: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Roadmap for adoption of health apps

2 2 IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient Apps for Improved Healthcare: From Novelty to Mainstream; 2013.

Page 3: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Characterizing the value of apps

3 3

Does the app improve

health?

Does the app meet

the needs of the patient?

Do consumers find the app

useful?

Would a doctor

recommend this app?

Is the app safe?

Role in High-Cost, High-Need Patients

Page 4: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Characterizing the value of apps

4 4

Literature Review

Interviews with

Experts

App Review

Usability Study

Page 5: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps improve health?

5 5

Page 6: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps improve health?

6 6

Systematic review of

RCTs

One RCT

Well-designed controlled trials

without randomization, quasi-experimental

Well-designed case-control and cohort studies

Systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies

Single descriptive or qualitative study

Opinion of authorities or reports of expert committees

Evidence-based practice in

nursing & healthcare: a guide to

best practice

Bernadette M. Melnyk and Ellen

Fineout-Overholt, 2005

Page 7: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps improve health?

7 7

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Randomized controlled trialRandomized trial with no controlNon-randomized controlled trial

Before-after studyInterrupted time series

Prospective cohort studyCross-sectional study

Qualitative researchCase report or case series

Study design

Median number

of participants

31 Included adults

≥ 65 years old

30%

Median length of

follow-up

1.4 mo

Authors also

developers

61%

App as only

intervention

12% Evaluated

clinical outcome

21%

Registered on

clinicaltrials.gov

7% Positive clinical

outcome

72%

Page 8: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps meet patient needs?

8 8

Number of

studies on apps

175

App name not

stated in study

40%

App not found

on app store

30%

App found on

app store

30%

Page 9: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps meet patient needs?

9 9

Page 10: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps meet patient needs?

10 10

8%

21%

9%

37%

31%

75%

26%

21%

0%20%40%60%80%100%

In the scientific literature

[VALUE]

59%

59%

45%

85%

88%

64%

58%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

On the app store

Provides educational info

Reminds or alerts

Records info

Summarizes info

Provides guidance

Data sharing with

caregiver

Data sharing with

clinician

Engages through social

media

Page 11: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Do apps meet patient needs?

11 11

Page 12: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

App store rating vs. clinical utility vs. usability

12 12

Page 13: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Are apps safe?

13 13

Apps without

privacy policy

36%

Data sharing

using e-mail

48%

Data sharing

using text

12%

Data sharing

using HealthKit

11%

Data sharing

using Google Fit

3%

Data sharing via

separate login

10%

Page 14: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications
Page 15: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Results

• Three groups – 9 caregivers

– 10 patients with depression

– 10 with diabetes

• Given condition-specific tasks – Enter your blood glucose

• Completion rate 43% without assistance

• Key themes – Lack of confidence with technology

– Frustration with design features and navigation

– Interest in having technology to support their self-

management

Page 16: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Conclusions re Apps

• Apps have the potential to improve healthcare

• Yet also potential to cause harm as they become

increasingly integrated with the healthcare system • What if low blood glucose values not recorded?

• What if no one alerted about suicidal ideation?

• Not being directed at patients who can benefit the most

from them • Level of evidence to date re benefit limited

• Apps are hard to use for patients with chronic illnesses • But patients do want them!

• Key frontiers • Linking mobile apps with EHRs and PHRs

• Getting wearable data in and sifting through it

Page 17: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

OECD Takeaways

• Quality

– Even more important and very big gaps

– Literature is lacking

• Safety

– Clearly problems and some standards or best

practices are needed

– Privacy not yet adequately addressed

• Patient engagement

– Lots of room for improvement—little

gamification, use of social media approaches

17

Page 18: Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement ... - David Bates.pdf · Data Challenges in Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality and Safety of Mobile Health Applications

Team

University of Michigan

Karandeep Singh, MD, MMSc

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Adam Landman, MD, MS, MIS, MHS

Kaitlin Drouin, MS, MA

Erika Pabo, MD, MBA

Ronen Rozenblum, PhD, MPH

Arild Faxvaag, MD

Elissa Klinger, MS

Partners Healthcare System

Lisa P. Newmark

Malina Filkins

Elizabeth Silvers

Kevin Kron

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

JaeHo Lee, MD, PhD

Stanford University

Donna M. Zulman, MD, MS

UCSF

Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH

Gato Gourley, MSc

18 18