Daniel Moore Mathew Taylor
-
Upload
bruce-brewer -
Category
Documents
-
view
36 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Daniel Moore Mathew Taylor
NATURAL BACKGROUND TOPSOIL ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS
AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLYING SGVs(HEALTH)
Daniel Moore Mathew Taylor
Ministry for the Environment Environment Waikato
Introduction
• Acknowledgements
• Policy : toxicological vs. natural
• Limited published arsenic data
• Regional council data request
Timber Treatment Guidelines 1997
“The nominated criterion should not be less than a reasonable background concentration of arsenic. In this regard a value of, say, 30 mg/kg may be appropriate (Spier, 1997) notes that typically background concentrations of arsenic in New Zealand soils range from 2 to 30 mg/kg)”
Arsenic dataset
• Collate existing data
• Sample density, variability, confidence
• Identification of data limitations
• Assess key drivers of landscape-scale
variation
Regional data summary Region Total Number of
SamplesNumber of Background
SamplesSampling Depth
(cm)No of cores per sample
Auckland 96 96 0-15 4
CD Auckland 40 0 0-7.5 10
CD Tasman 25 0 0-7.5 10
Marlborough 14 0 0-7.5 25
Marlborough 46 6 0-10 15
CD Waikato 44 7 0-7.5 10
Waikato 267 32 0-10 4
Hawke’s Bay 22 22 0-10 ?
Hawke’s Bay 4 4 0-15 ?
Wellington 110 25 0-10 20
URS Wellington 59 55 0-15 4
Canterbury 90 73 0-15 4
Bay of Plenty 98 17 0-10 50
NZ wide Longhurst et. al., (2004) 398 86 0-2.5 and 2.5-7.5 16
Data analysis
• Data quality
• Standardised land use
• Standardised soil type
• Data desk
• Pooled t-test
Data limitations
• Variation in the sampling and
analysis methodology
• Poor land use classification
• Representative Background data
• Variation due to soil type
• The effect of soil bulk density
Conclusions
• Bush, indigenous forest, native = background
• National As average 6.0 mg/kg
• Background As average 4.5 mg/kg
• Cropping, horticulture and urban land uses higher
concentrations than background.
• Waikato region statistical significance