DAMS One Year Review - Campus Presentation
-
Upload
jacknickelson -
Category
Documents
-
view
295 -
download
2
Transcript of DAMS One Year Review - Campus Presentation
DAMSDAMS
James Hilton,Provost’s Office
John Williams, Louis E. King, Al McCord,Digital Media Commons, Duderstadt Center
Campus Presentation July 30, 2004
Digital Asset Management SystemsUniversity of Michigan
Agenda - Morning
Time Item
10:00-10:15 Gather & Opening Remarks
10:15–11:15 Demonstration & Questions
11:15–11:45 Discussion
Explore an infrastructure that will fundamentally change the way we currently use time-based media to a
manner similar to our use of text and images today!
DAMS Living Lab
• Ingest, manage, store and publish digital rich-media assets and their associated metadata.
• Streamline the “workflow” required to create new works with digital rich-media assets.
• Search, share, edited and repurpose assets in the academic model.
• Prepare for future application of campus-wide rights and intellectual property management to existing assets.
Internalization
Institutionalization
Adoption
Trial UseIBM & Stellent DAMS LL
UnderstandingCNN Visit - RFP
AwarenessPresentations, Exec
ContactUMTV & Informix
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Case in Technology Adoption
Adoption
Commitment
• Create an end-to-end digital asset management system as the “Living Lab” – a working demonstration environment
• Identify areas for collaborative research projects around subjects such as digital rights, open standards, and learning technologies.
• Support pilot projects
• Co-create a marketing and communications program to promote the Lab’s efforts across campus, the higher education community
IBM, Stellent, and U of M Partnership
The Trial Use Environment
• Context of “IT Commons”• Collaborative model
• “Demand pull” versus “provider push”
• Cross-unit dialog and discussion• Opportunities
• “Buy versus build” dialog
• Executive support• RFP for integrated COTS solution
• Location for trial use (“DAMS Living Lab”)
• Experimental support for units
• Firm commitment to experimental model
Academic Projects
• Participation by Academic Units (Assessing demand on campus)• LS&A – History of Art, Psychology, English• Business• Dentistry• Pharmacy, Information, Music, News
• Faculty focused
• Affiliate Supported
• Digital Media Commons• Stewardship• Campus Partners – ITCS, ITComm, News Services
Production, Publications, Broadcast Content
Collaborative Research
Archived Collections
Casual Learning & Exploration
Course Materials
Digita
l Lib
rarie
s
Depar
tmen
tal S
tora
ge
Team
Work
spac
e/Sto
rage
Content M
gmt.
Syste
ms
Perso
nal S
hare-
fold
ers
Product
ion S
yste
ms
Inst
itutio
nal R
eposi
torie
s
Collaborative Learning
Ty
pe
s o
f C
oll
ab
ora
tio
nT
yp
es
of
Co
lla
bo
rati
on
Ad-hoc Sharing
ePortfolios
Course
Mgm
t. Sys
tem
s
Individual Content Owners Institution
Individual Browsing
Research
Portal Development & Content
What Space Does DAMS Occupy?
EncodeEncodeEncodeEncode
TranscodeTranscodeTranscodeTranscode
MetatagMetatagMetatagMetatag
ProxiesProxiesProxiesProxies
EncryptEncryptEncryptEncrypt
StoreStoreStoreStore
TrafficTrafficTrafficTraffic
File ServeFile ServeFile ServeFile Serve
StreamingStreamingStreamingStreaming
BroadcastBroadcastBroadcastBroadcast
Web Pub.Web Pub.Web Pub.Web Pub.
PrintingPrintingPrintingPrinting
CD/DVDCD/DVDCD/DVDCD/DVD
ViewViewViewView
MetadataMetadataMetadataMetadata
AccessAccessAccessAccess
WorkflowWorkflowWorkflowWorkflow
VersionVersionVersionVersion
Check in/outCheck in/outCheck in/outCheck in/out
DRMDRMDRMDRM
Enterprise Enterprise DataData
Enterprise Enterprise DataData
UnitUnitUnitUnit UnitUnitUnitUnit UnitUnitUnitUnit UnitUnitUnitUnit UnitUnitUnitUnit UnitUnitUnitUnit
Near-lineNear-lineNear-lineNear-line Near-lineNear-lineNear-lineNear-line Near-lineNear-lineNear-lineNear-line Near-lineNear-lineNear-lineNear-lineOfflineOfflineOfflineOffline OfflineOfflineOfflineOffline OfflineOfflineOfflineOffline
AuthoringAuthoringStationsStations
AuthoringAuthoringStationsStations
MediaMediaAppliancesAppliances
MediaMediaAppliancesAppliances
Remote Remote UsersUsers
Remote Remote UsersUsers
Campus Campus UsersUsers
Campus Campus UsersUsers
StudiosStudiosStudiosStudios
Producers
Collaborators
Audience
Ingest
Store
PublishManage
CampusCampusBroadcastBroadcastCampusCampus
BroadcastBroadcastPrintPrint
PublishingPublishingPrintPrint
PublishingPublishing
SecureSecureWebWeb
SecureSecureWebWeb
PublicPublicWebWeb
PublicPublicWebWeb
CampusCampusServicesServicesCampusCampusServicesServices
CourseCourseManagementManagement
CourseCourseManagementManagement
DAMS Component Services
Workflow
AMS 3.5WebsphereContent ManagerDB2
End User CreatesPrime Digital SourceThe PDS can be an existing file
1
Broadcast
Live
Tape
Analyze
Transcode
Store
Stream
DAMS manages ordering services and moving filesfor analysis, transcoding,storage, and streaming
Prime Digital Source
Prime Digital Source DV MPEG2 Offline RT MPEG1
Video
Frame Size (pixels x pixels) 720 x 480 720 x 480 320 x 240 352 x 240
Frame Rate (frames/sec) 30 30 30 30
Compression/Codec DV MPEG2 Photo-JPEG MPEG1
Audio
Sample Rate (kHz) 48 48 48 44.1
Sample Size (bit) 16 16 16 16
Channels 2 2 2 2
Compression/Codec None None None MPEG Layer 2
Data Rate
Video 3.4 MBps 5.7 MBps 275 KBps 1.1 MBps
Audio 187 KBps 187 KBps 187 KBps 300 KBps
Total (MB/second) 3.6 6 465 KBps 1.5
Popular Derivatives
Derivatives (4:3 ratio) High Medium Low
QuickTime, Real, Windows
Video
Frame Size (pixels x pixels) 512x384 320x240 256x192
Frame Rate (frames/sec) 30 15 10
Video Compression/Codec
QuickTime MPEG4 MPEG4 MPEG4
Real Real10 Real10 Real10
Windows V9 V9 V9
Audio
Sample Rate (kHz) 44 44 22
Sample Size (bit) 16 16 16
Channels 2 1 1
Compression/Codec
QuickTime MPEG4 MPEG4 MPEG4
Real Voice Voice Voice
Windows V9 V9 V9
Neighborhood CentralLocal
Lessons Learned - Architecture
LiveTape/CD/DVDInternet Appliance
Satellite
Video LoggerFlip Factory
(Optional)
AMS 3.5Content ManagerDB2
Spinning Disk Spinning DiskNearline/OfflineBackupTivoli
PrintWebCD/DVD
Media StreamingReal/Win/QT
Course MgmtePorfoliosPersonal Storage
Capture
Ingest
Manage
Store
Publish
X
X
X
X
Lessons Learned - Managing Access Control Lists
In the commercial sectorasset privileges correspond to
corporate hierarchy!
Easily managed centrally through system defined ACLs
In higher educationasset privileges are unrelated to the
institutional hierarchy!
Requires distributed management through User Defined ACLs
De
cis
ion
Ma
kin
gD
ec
isio
n M
ak
ing
+
-
.
Rights Holders
System Admins
Affiliates
Collaborators
Viewers
Guests
Board of DirectorsExecutive StaffAdministratorsCustomers - Level 1Customers - Level 2Customers - Special
RegentsExecutive StaffFacultyStudentsStaffFriends/Affiliates
Privileges
CorporateHierarchy
Privileges
InstitutionalHierarchy
Rights Holders
System Admins
Affiliates
Collaborators
Viewers
Guests
Rights Holders / Creators
Licensees
Administrators
Collaborators
Groups
Open Access
Lessons Learned - More Access Control Lists Needed
In the commercial sector, access to media is defined and
controlled centrallyDozens of Access Control Lists
In higher education, access to media is defined and
controlled by end users.100,000+ Access Control Lists
Board of Directors
Executive Staff
Administrators
Customers - Level 1
Customers - Level 2
Customers - Special
Lessons Learned - Metadata
• UM Core = Dublin Core + UM Special
• Provide structured metadata but allow users to map into fields in unstructured ways (contrary to controlled taxonomies of our libraries)
• Allow for multiple metadata schemas to be attached to a single asset (ie Dublin Core, IMS, SCORM, etc.)
Lessons Learned - Interface
• Indicators of privileges
• Grayed menu items
• User defined ACLs
• Open source application Assets Show PrivilegesAssets Show Privileges
Gray Menu ItemsGray Menu Items
Lessons Learned - Policy
• Rights DeclarationCopyright issues must be addressed in a systemic way – to start, UMCore metadata schema can support a rights declaration
• Digital Rights ManagementThe largest early us of DRM is for distribution of licensed materials. Need to evaluate products that allow keys to be set to control access and expire media after its intended period of use.
• Statutory ComplianceManaging regulatory issues such as FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Education Act) and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) must be built in.
• User Education & Use PolicyEducation, training, and support on metadata and file quality will help distribute the work load and maximize the ability to share materials and ensure appropriate use
Near Loomings
• User Defined ACLs
• Interface development for UD-ACLs
• Clip-making functionality
• Enterprise environment pilot w/ neighborhood(s)
• IP, Copyright, Privacy, Use and Misuse policy
• Building a great user experience
Far Loomings
• Ongoing interface design to meet project and user requirements(Taking into consideration asset management’s inherently different approach of presenting multiple items, each of which may have a different set of user capabilities associated with it)
• Integration with other academic tools (Sakai) or portal
• Relationship to Library, Institutional Repository and federatedcatalogue searching
Bloomings
• Possible partnership w/ IBM & Stellent to build a JSR168 compliant DAMS interface to IBMs Content Manager middleware
• Leverage extensibility, massive computational power and scheduling of M-Grid to weave together the DAMS service layer – i.e. distributed neighborhoods of media transcoding, analysis, storage, and streaming.
UM DAMS Contacts
University of Michigan DAMS Initiativehttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/dams/
James Hilton [email protected]
Associate Provost for Academic, Information and Instructional Technology Affairs
Louis E. King [email protected]
Managing Producer, Digital Asset Management Systems
Alan McCord, Ph.D [email protected]
Vendor and Institutional Relationships
John Merlin Williams [email protected]
Executive Producer, Digital Media Commons