APPLICATION Damper.pdfAPPLICATION CONSTRUCTION Fire Damper is generally used for control in air...
Transcript of APPLICATION Damper.pdfAPPLICATION CONSTRUCTION Fire Damper is generally used for control in air...
-
APPLICATION
CONSTRUCTION
Fire Damper is generally used for control in air distribution system. In event of fire, Fire Damper will shut automatically, discontinuing air flow into the room, thus, prevent spreading of fire.
Casing: 6.0mm thick mild steel sheetBlade Shafts: mild steel rod/square tube
Finish: Red Lead PrimerOFusible Link: 68 C (Option)
Fire Rating: 4 hours
5
4
3
2
1
STANDARD SIZESDamper Size: 150
-
Building E-F, Tiantou Industrial Area, Pingshan Street, PingshanNew District, Shenzhen City, Guandong Province, P.R.China.TEL: (86-755) 8993 7642 (852) 8302 4988FAX: (86-755) 8993 7775 (86-755) 8993 7286E-MAIL: [email protected]: www.luenming.com
11/F, Gemmy Factory Building, 12 Hung To Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, HongKong.TEL: (852) 2797 2168 FAX:(852) 2790 1254E-MAIL: [email protected]: www.luenming.com
-
PolyU Technology & Consultancy PolyU Technology & Consultancy Company Company 理 大 科 技 及 顧 問 有 限 公 司 理 大 科 技 及 顧 問 有 限 公 司
CONSULTANCY SERVICE
for
Luen Ming Peng Shan Air Conditioning Factory Ltd.
(Ref: P09-0015)
Evaluation of the damper performance
Page 1
-
Project Description The Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) was mandated to measure the air damper casing, closed blade leakages and flow performance for four numbers of air damper: model 联明‘LM’VCD -500×300, model 联明‘LM’VCD -600×600, model 联明‘LM’NRD -600×600 and model 联明‘LM’FD -600×600 in accordance with the BS EN 1751:1999, Ventilation for buildings – Air terminal devices – Aerodynamic testing of dampers and valves. Results of air damper casing and closed blade leakages for model 联明‘LM’VCD -500×300 have been reported in the consultancy report (Ref: P08-0619). The tests were conducted inside the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory and outside the Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU.
Project Team
Client: Luen Ming Peng Shan Air Conditioning Factory Ltd. Consultant: Dr. Tracy Y.S. Choy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU. Dr. Randolph C.K. Leung, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
PolyU. Supporting Staff: Dr. C.H. Ng, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU. Mr. C.Y. Ho, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU.
Date of Measurements
20-31 July 2009.
Location of Laboratories
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (GH034), Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU. Space outside Acoustics Laboratory (DE001), Department of Mechanical Engineering, PolyU. Testing Environment: The leakage tests were conducted in the air-conditioned Fluid Mechanics Laboratory which
Page 2
-
provides a steady ambient temperature environment throughout the leakage tests. Since the size of the flow performance test rig was over 15m in length, the flow performance tests were conducted at the open space outside the Acoustics Laboratory, PolyU. The open space is a semi-enclosed environment where the disturbance from wind can be ignored.
References:
BS EN 1751:1999, Ventilation for buildings – Air terminal devices – Aerodynamic testing of dampers and valves, British Standards Institution. ISO 5221:1984, Air distribution and air diffusion – Rules to methods of measuring air flow rate in an air handling duct, International Organization for Standardization. HVCA DW/144, Specification for Sheet Metal Ductwork, Heating and Ventilating Contractors’ Association.
Instruments
Micro-manometer Model FCO12 (S/N FC0401114) manufactured by Furness Controls Limited, England.
AIRFLOW High velocity Ductwork Leakage Tester MK2 (S/N 45679) manufactured by Airflow Development Limited, England.
AIRFLOW High velocity Ductwork Leakage Tester manufactured by Airflow Development Limited, England.
Manometer Type Mk 4P (S/N 34458) manufactured by Airflow Development Limited, England.
Page 3
-
Client’s Provisions [1] Specimens Four numbers of air damper designed for medium pressure ductwork system (DW/144): A two opposed-blades 500×300×150mm (W×H×L) volume control damper (sVCD)
model 联明‘LM’VCD -500×300 (Figure 1); A five opposed-blades 600×600×150mm (W×H×L) volume control damper (VCD)
model 联明‘LM’VCD -600×600 (Figure 2). A five blades 600×600×150mm (W×H×L) non-return damper (NRD) model 联明
‘LM’NRD -600×600 (Figure 3); A five blades 600×600×200mm (W×H×L) fire damper (FD) model 联明‘LM’FD
-600×600 (Figure 4). [2] Equipment The air source and the associated ductworks as shown in Drawings 1 and 2, the ductwork used in the air damper leakage test as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 7, and an AIRFLOW High velocity Ductwork Leakage Tester were provided by the client.
Figure 1. Air Volume Control Damper Model 联明‘LM’VCD -500×300.
Page 4
-
Figure 2. Volume Control Damper Model 联明‘LM’VCD -600×600.
Figure 3. Non-return Damper Model 联明‘LM’NRD -600×600.
Page 5
-
Figure 4. Fire Damper Model 联明‘LM’FD -600×600.
Procedures for Casing Leakage Measurement (BS EN 1751:1999) The experimental set-up for casing leakage measurement was shown in Figure 5, 6 and 7. The instrument of the tester and manometer were shown in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 7, the downstream of the damper was sealed up with an end plate. 1. The damper was set to the open position. 2. Ductwork static pressure was increased to about 1000Pa and was checked if leakage
exists in the ductwork and connections. 3. Ductwork pressure was reduced to atmospheric pressure. 4. Ductwork static pressure was increased to about 50Pa and the pressure was maintained
for one minute. 5. Ductwork static pressure and the air flow rate from the air leakage tester were recorded. 6. Procedures 4 and 5 were repeated several times by increasing the ductwork static pressure
slightly until the maximum recommended pressure (i.e. 1kPa) was reached.
Page 6
-
Figure 5. Air damper leakage test setup.
Figure 6. Air damper leakage test instrument setup.
Figure 7. Damper case leakage test, damper covered with end plate.
Page 7
-
Procedures for Damper Closed Blade Measurement (BS EN 1751:1999) The experimental set-up for damper in fully closed and open condition was shown in Figure 8 and 9 respectively. The downstream end plate installed in casing leakage measurement is removed. The testing instrument of manometer and leakage tester used in this experiment was shown in Figure 6. The procedure of the test is listed as follows. 1. The damper was cycled 10 times between fully open and fully closed position. 2. The damper was set to the closed position (Figure 8). 3. The ductwork static pressure was increased to about 50Pa and the pressure was kept for
one minute. 4. Supply air flow rate was kept and the damper was modulated to the open position (Figure
9) and then was returned to the closed position (Figure 8). 5. Ductwork static pressure and the air flow rate from the air leakage tester were recorded. 6. Procedures 3 to 5 were repeated several times by increasing the ductwork static pressure
slightly until the maximum recommended pressure (i.e. 1kPa) was reached.
Figure 8. Damper blades leakage test, blades closed.
Page 8
-
Figure 9. Damper blades leakage test, blades opened.
Figure 10. Flow performance test rig for 500 × 300 mm damper
as viewed from the outlet.
Page 9
-
Figure 11. Flow performance test rig for 500 × 300 mm damper as viewed from the fan inlet.
Figure 12. Flow performance test rig for 600 × 600 mm damper
as viewed from the outlet.
Page 10
-
Figure 13. Flow performance test rig for 600 × 600 mm damper
as viewed from the fan inlet.
Page 11
-
Procedures for Flow rate and Pressure Test (BS EN 1751:1999 & ISO 5221:1984) Two sizes of air damper were supplied by the client, 500 × 300 mm and 600 × 600 mm (W × D). The configuration of the test rigs for each damper size is illustrated in Drawing 1 (p.33) and 2 (p.34) respectively. The experimental Set-up for flow-rate measurements are shown in Figure 10 to 11 for 500 × 300 damper and Figure 12 and 13 for 600 × 600 dampers correspondingly. 1. Uniformity test was conducted at the static pressure measurement plane prior to the flow
rate and pressure test commenced. Velocity survey has been conducted at 10 equally spaced intervals along the vertical and horizontal axes.
2. The damper was set to the open position (except the NRD). 3. Ambient atmospheric pressure was recorded. 4. The fan was adjusted to a flow rate where the static pressure of the ductwork reached
10Pa (For the 600 × 600 dampers, the VCD at the end of the ductwork was adjusted to ¾ opening).
5. Flow speeds and static pressure at the corresponding measurement planes were recorded (i.e. the pressure loss for the ductwork plus the specimen was found).
6. Air temperature inside the ductwork at the flow speed measurement and the static pressure measurement plane were recorded.
7. Four more flow rates were tested by repeating procedures 3 to 6. 8. For volume control dampers, procedures 2 to 7 were repeated for ¾, ½ and ¼ opening
positions. 9. The specimen was removed from the test rig, procedures 5 to 7 were repeated for similar
flow rates conducted and hence the pressure loss for the ductwork was found. 10. The pressure loss for each specimen was found by subtracting the corresponding result in
procedure 5 by that from procedure 9.
Page 12
-
Results Air Damper Case and Damper Blades’ Leakages Details of the damper casing and closed blade leakage results are tabulated in Table 1 and Table 2 for VCD, Table 3 and Table 4 for NRD, and Table 5 and Table 6 for FD respectively. Summary of the measurement data are shown in Figure 14 to Figure 19 for all dampers’ casing and closed blade leakages correspondingly. Classification of the damper casing and closed blade leakage in accordance with the BS EN 1751:1999 standard for medium-ductwork pressure as defined in HVCA standard DW/144 for all specimens are summarised in the following table:
600 × 600 mm dampers Case Leakage Closed Blade Leakage
VCD Class A Class 3
NRD Class A Class 1
FD Class B #Class 1 # Due to the limited capacity of the air leakage tester, the maximum leakage flow-rate done
in this test was 61.1 L/s at 210 Pa. Air Damper Flow Performance Results of uniformity tests of the velocity profiles for both test rigs (Drawings 1 and 2) are tabulated in and Table 7 and Table 8 and illustrated in Figure 20 and Figure 21 correspondingly. No measurement point exceeded 10% of the mean value over the test duct cross-section for both test rigs. Therefore, the test rigs were suitable for carrying out the air damper flow performance tests. There were no significant differences in the air temperature and static pressure between flow measurement plane and the damper under all tests. As a result, no correction is required for the measured flow rates. Flow rate and pressure requirement for all air dampers are plotted in Figure 22 to Figure 31. From these graphs, pressure drop within the tested flow ranges for each air damper can be deduced and the pressure drop against duct velocity for all air dampers are illustrated in Figure 32 to Figure 35.
Page 13
-
Page 14
Table 1. Results for VCD case leakages. Duct Static Pressure Case Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 59 0.1474 82 0.1828 100 0.2038 107 0.2121 129 0.2303 165 0.2734 193 0.2954 222 0.3158 256 0.3464 300 0.3788 352 0.4100 388 0.4311 464 0.4716 526 0.5152 634 0.5553 718 0.6016 800 0.6410 864 0.6676 934 0.7124
Table 2. Results for VCD closed blade leakages. Duct Static Pressure Closed Blade Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 67 4.7744 76 5.1094 88 5.8861 129 6.9276 157 7.7745 208 9.7243 232 9.8895 262 10.9097 330 11.6034 389 12.0680 455 13.0499 506 14.1372 584 15.4532 654 16.7009 764 18.6906 880 20.5870 984 22.3747
-
Table 3. Results for NRD case leakages. Duct Static Pressure Case Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 73 0.1696 79 0.1796 107 0.2148 125 0.2377 162 0.2713 175 0.2915 193 0.3048 218 0.3228 240 0.3448 275 0.3832 310 0.4154 352 0.4337 410 0.4934 476 0.5382 530 0.5737 668 0.6520 776 0.7147 780 0.7093 850 0.7493 958 0.8074
Table 4. Results for NRD closed blade leakages. Duct Static Pressure Closed Blade Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 62 80.3867 91 87.1103 128 92.4424 174 99.6859 231 99.9976 300 107.0063 346 111.2725 418 115.8234 490 119.7672 570 124.8266 680 133.5917 800 142.8831 900 149.6016 980 154.2385 1040 158.7418
Page 15
-
Table 5. Results for FD case leakages. Duct Static Pressure Case Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 58 0.1107 66 0.1160 70 0.1258 124 0.1625 160 0.1796 175 0.1951 212 0.2148 270 0.2494 317 0.2606 364 0.2836 430 0.3158 487 0.3365 540 0.3653 638 0.3890 736 0.4220 812 0.4413 934 0.4693
Table 6. Results for FD closed blade leakages. Duct Static Pressure Closed Blade Leakage
(Pa) (l/s.m2) 53 67.8330 64 77.5574 78 88.1161 90 98.5933 102 107.8518 118 116.6171 136 125.4382 150 134.0019 168 142.0361 194 156.7311 210 169.6924
Page 16
-
Table 7. Velocity Profiles for 500 × 300 mm test rig. Vertical axis Horizontal Axis
(m/s) % (m/s) % 11.1 -4% 10.0 7% 11.2 -5% 10.1 6% 11.0 -3% 11.0 -3% 11.0 -3% 10.7 0% 11.2 -5% 10.9 -2% 11.4 -6% 10.4 3% 10.8 -1% 11.0 -3% 10.1 6% 11.0 -3% 10.2 5% 10.9 -2% 9.9 8% 10.3 4% Average Speed 10.7 m/s
Table 8. Velocity Profiles for 600 × 600 mm test rig. Vertical axis Horizontal Axis
(m/s) % (m/s) % 6.9 8% 7.6 -2% 6.9 8% 7.7 -3% 7.3 2% 7.8 -5% 7.5 -1% 7.5 -1% 7.5 -1% 7.7 -3% 7.6 -2% 7.8 -5% 7.5 -1% 7.8 -5% 8 -7% 7.5 -1%
7.7 -3% 7.2 3% 6.8 9% 6.9 8% Average Speed 7.5 m/s
Page 17
-
Date of testing: 31 July 2009 Time: 10:00~11:15
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’VCD
-600×600 Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.0
Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 776.5
Leakage Test Type: Case Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class A Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Case Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1 2 3 4
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
10
20
30
4050
100
200
300
400500
1000
2000Class B Class AClass C
Note: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.2.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 14. Test summary for VCD casing leakage.
Page 18
-
Date of testing: 31 July 2009 Time: 11:20~12:15
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’VCD
-600×600 Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.0
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 776.5
Leakage Test Type: Damper Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class 3 Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Closed Blade Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 50 100 200 300 500 1000 2000
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
50
100
200
300
400
500
1000
2000 Class 2 Class 1Class 3Class 4
Class 0: no control on leakageNote: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.1.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 15. Test summary for VCD closed blade leakage.
Page 19
-
Date of testing: 30 July 2009 Time: 11:40~12:30
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’NRD
-600×600 Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.0
Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 776.5
Leakage Test Type: Case Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class A Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Case Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1 2 3 4
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
10
20
30
4050
100
200
300
400500
1000
2000Class B Class AClass C
Note: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.2.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 16. Test summary for NRD casing leakage.
Page 20
-
Date of testing: 30 July 2009 Time: 14:20~15:10
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’NRD -600×600
Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.0
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 776.5
Leakage Test Type: Damper Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class 1 Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Closed Blade Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 50 100 200 300 500 1000 2000
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
50
100
200
300
400
500
1000
2000 Class 2 Class 1Class 3Class 4
Class 0: no control on leakageNote: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.1.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 17. Test summary for NRD closed blade leakage.
Page 21
-
Date of testing: 27 July 2009 Time: 17:35~18:20
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’FD -600×600
Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 200 Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.5
Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 780.5
Leakage Test Type: Case Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class B Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Case Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1 2 3 4
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
10
20
30
4050
100
200
300
400500
1000
2000Class B Class AClass C
Note: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.2.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 18. Test summary for FD casing leakage.
Page 22
-
Date of testing: 28 July 2009 Time: 11:00~12:00
Location: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at GH034, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’FD -600×600 Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 200 Damper Free Area (m2): 0.36
Ambient Temperature (°C): 19.0
Atmospheric Pressure (mm Hg): 780.5
Leakage Test Type: Damper Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999
Leakage Classification: Class 1 Upper Duct Static Pressure (Pa): 1000
Damper Closed Blade Leakage
Leakage qVLBA in l/(s.m2)
1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 50 100 200 300 500 1000 2000
Duc
t Pre
ssur
e p s
in P
a
50
100
200
300
400
500
1000
2000 Class 2 Class 1Class 3Class 4
Class 0: no control on leakageNote: Graph reproduced from BS EN 1751:1999 Figure C.1.
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 19. Test summary for FD closed blade leakage.
Page 23
-
Location
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Velo
city
[m/s
]
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
+10%
-10%
Mean
Horizontal Axis
Vertical Axis
Figure 20. Velocity profiles for 500 × 300 mm test rig.
Location
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Velo
city
[m/s
]
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
+10%
-10%
Mean
Horizontal AxisVertical Axis
Figure 21. Velocity profiles for 600 × 600 mm test rig.
Page 24
-
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
20
40
60
80
10010 m/s
Figure 22. Flow rate and pressure requirement of sVCD at fully open condition. : With damper; : Without damper; “–––” : Regression line; “---” : ± 5% of the regression line.
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
50
100
150
200
250
30010 m/s
Figure 23. Flow rate and pressure requirement of sVCD at ¾ open condition. Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
Page 25
-
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure 24. Flow rate and pressure requirement of sVCD at ½ open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Figure 25. Flow rate and pressure requirement of sVCD at ¼ open condition. Legends: same as those in Figure 22. (Lines and symbols for without damper are too small for display)
Page 26
-
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0 5 10 15 20
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
100
200
300
400
50010 m/s
Figure 26. Flow rate and pressure requirement of VCD at fully open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0 5 10 15 20
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
100
200
300
400
50010 m/s
Figure 27. Flow rate and pressure requirement of VCD at ¾ open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
Page 27
-
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0 2 4 6 8 10
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure 28. Flow rate and pressure requirement of VCD at ½ open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Figure 29. Flow rate and pressure requirement of VCD at ¼ open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
Page 28
-
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0 5 10 15 20
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
100
200
300
400
50010 m/s
Figure 30. Flow rate and pressure requirement of NRD at fully open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
q2vin, [ (m3/s)
2
]
0 5 10 15 20
p si(a
), [P
a]
0
100
200
300
400
50010 m/s
Figure 31. Flow rate and pressure requirement of FD at fully open condition.
Legends: same as those in Figure 22.
Page 29
-
Date of testing: 24 July 2009 Time: N/A
Location: Space outside Acoustics Laboratory at DE001, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’VCD -500×300
Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 500 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 300 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999 Damper Free Area
(m2): 0.15 Upper Duct Static
Pressure (Pa): 1000
Duct Velocity, [m/s]
0.5 1 2 5 10
Pres
sure
Dro
p, [P
a]
1
2
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
1000
Fully
Ope
n
3/4 O
pen
1/2 O
pen
1/4 O
pen
Regression Lines
Fully Open Pressure Drop = 0.37250775 × (Duct Velocity)2
¾ Open Pressure Drop = 2.10617775 × (Duct Velocity)2
½ Open Pressure Drop = 23.26936275 × (Duct Velocity)2
¼ Open Pressure Drop = 260.78161275 × (Duct Velocity)2
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 32. Test summary for sVCD flow performance.
Page 30
-
Date of testing: 23 July 2009 Time: N/A
Location: Space outside Acoustics Laboratory at DE001, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’VCD -600×600
Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999 Damper Free Area
(m2): 0.36 Upper Duct Static
Pressure (Pa): 1000
Duct Velocity, [m/s]
0.5 1 2 5 10
Pres
sure
Dro
p, [P
a]
1
2
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
1000
Fully
Ope
n3/4
Open
1/2 O
pen
1/4 O
pen
Regression Lines
Fully Open Pressure Drop = 0.4384368 × (Duct Velocity)2
¾ Open Pressure Drop = 0.8431776 × (Duct Velocity)2
½ Open Pressure Drop = 10.8453168 × (Duct Velocity)2
¼ Open Pressure Drop = 342.4554288 × (Duct Velocity)2
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 33. Test summary for VCD flow performance.
Page 31
-
Date of testing: 22 July 2009 Time: N/A Location: Space outside Acoustics Laboratory at DE001, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’NRD
-600×600 Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999 Damper Free Area
(m2): 0.36 Upper Duct Static
Pressure (Pa): 500
Duct Velocity, [m/s]
0.5 1 2 5 10
Pres
sure
Dro
p, [P
a]
1
2
5
10
20
50
100
Fully
Ope
n
Regression Lines
Fully Open Pressure Drop = 0.0923625 × (Duct Velocity)2
¾ Open N/A
½ Open N/A
¼ Open N/A
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 34. Test summary for NRD flow performance.
Page 32
-
Date of testing: 20 July 2009 Time: N/A
Location: Space outside Acoustics Laboratory at DE001, PolyU
Damper Model: 联明‘LM’FD -600×600
Material: Galvanised Steel
Damper Width (mm): 600 No. of blades: 5
Damper Height (mm): 600 Damper Control: Manual
Damper Length (mm): 150 Test Basis: BS EN 1751:1999 Damper Free Area
(m2): 0.36 Upper Duct Static
Pressure (Pa): 500
Duct Velocity, [m/s]
0.5 1 2 5 10
Pres
sure
Dro
p, [P
a]
1
2
5
10
20
50
100
Fully
Ope
n
Regression Lines
Fully Open Pressure Drop = 0.5279904 × (Duct Velocity)2
¾ Open N/A
½ Open N/A
¼ Open N/A
Test By: C.Y. Ho Witness By: C.H. Ng
Figure 35. Test summary for FD flow performance.
Page 33
-
Page 34
-
Page 35
-
序号 开工年份
1. 2008
2. 2009
3. 2009
4. 2009
5. 2010
6. 2011
7. 2011
8. 2011
9. 2011
10. 2011
11. 2011
12. 2012
13. 2012
14. 2012
15. 2013
16. 2013
17. 2013
工程项目
* 火炭体育学院
太古城酒店
中环添马舰(政府总部)
Tel:(852) 2797 2168 Fax:(852) 2790 1254Tel:(86-755) 8993 7642 (852) 8302 4988 Fax:(86-755) 8993 7286
西九龙KIL11073
将军澳HKDI/HKIVELWL
西九龙海庭道KIL11167/68
Kwun Tong,Kowloon,HongKong.
E-mail:[email protected]
Pingshan New District,Shenzhen City,P.R.China
E-mail:[email protected]
联明LocalMade防火闸(FD)工程参考
Building E-F, Tiantou Industrial Area, Pingshan Street,深圳市坪山新区坪山街道田头工业区E-F栋 香港九龍官塘創業街36號華基中心7字9室
Flat.9,7/F.,Ricky Centre,36 Chong Yip Street,
将军澳综合大楼44区
* 理工8期
中环利源东街
* 理工创新楼
大埔慈山寺
*九龙湾国际邮件中心
标有*号的项目均为联明公司供应及安装
红磡国际都会
*香港体育学院-第三工程沙田源禾路25号
沙田马场
铜锣湾时代广场
尖沙咀富豪酒店
-
序号 开工年份
18. 2013
19. 2013
20. 2013
21. 2013
22. 2013
23. 2013
24. 2013
25. 2013
26. 2013
27. 2013
28. 2013
29. 2013
30. 2013
31. 2013
32. 2013
33. 2014
34. 2014
Pingshan New District,Shenzhen City,P.R.China Kwun Tong,Kowloon,HongKong.Tel:(86-755) 8993 7642 (852) 8302 4988 Fax:(86-755) 8993 7286 Tel:(852) 2797 2168 Fax:(852) 2790 1254E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected]
将军澳新都城2期
标有*号的项目均为联明公司供应及安装
深圳市坪山新区坪山街道田头工业区E-F栋 香港九龍官塘創業街36號華基中心7字9室
Building E-F, Tiantou Industrial Area, Pingshan Street, Flat.9,7/F.,Ricky Centre,36 Chong Yip Street,
九龙富豪酒店
中环汇丰总行
蓝田汇景广场
柏宁酒店
海洋公园鲨鱼馆
中环渣打总行
中环德辅道中112-114号顺安商厦
沙田河畔花园
大角咀汇丰中心
马鞍山广场
深湾游艇会
沙田丽豪酒店
联明LocalMade防火闸(FD)工程参考
工程项目
太古城4期
联合医院
官塘王子大厦
湾仔皇后大道东281号华仁中学
-
序号 开工年份
35. 2014
36. 2014
37. 2014
38. 2014
39. 2014
40. 2014
41. 2014
42. 2014
43. 2014
44. 2015
45. 2015
46. 2015
47. 2015
48. 2015
49. 2015
50. 2015
51. 2015
Pingshan New District,Shenzhen City,P.R.China Kwun Tong,Kowloon,HongKong.Tel:(86-755) 8993 7642 (852) 8302 4988 Fax:(86-755) 8993 7286 Tel:(852) 2797 2168 Fax:(852) 2790 1254E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected]
尖沙咀海运大厦
标有*号的项目均为联明公司供应及安装
深圳市坪山新区坪山街道田头工业区E-F栋 香港九龍官塘創業街36號華基中心7字9室
Building E-F, Tiantou Industrial Area, Pingshan Street, Flat.9,7/F.,Ricky Centre,36 Chong Yip Street,
圣保禄医院
红磡香格里拉酒店
西贡大埔仔16座
将军澳新都城二期
白沙湾码头
天水围天盛商场
科技大学
尖沙咀美丽华商场
太古城2期
将军澳日出康城第三期
沙田石门安丽街沙田中心中电大厦
元朗西铁站
联明LocalMade防火闸(FD)工程参考
工程项目
九龙塘浸会大学
沙田希尔顿中心
中环新世界大厦
上水双鱼河马会
Fire DamperFire Damper---11: Cover2: Fire Damper-013: Fire Damper-02
Fire DamperFire Damper21: Cover2: Fire Damper-013: Fire Damper-02
010203040506070809101112131415Dampers_Tests20090811PolyU Technology & ConsultancyCompany Limited理大科技及顧問有限公司CONSULTANCY SERVICEfor
Project DescriptionProject TeamDate of MeasurementsLocation of LaboratoriesTesting Environment:References:InstrumentsClient’s ProvisionsProcedures for Casing Leakage Measurement (BS EN 1751:1999)Procedures for Damper Closed Blade Measurement (BS EN 1751:1999)Procedures for Flow rate and Pressure Test (BS EN 1751:1999 & ISO 5221:1984)Results
Job Reference for FDFDFD (2)FD (3)