Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport ASCE Presentation · Dallas/Fort Worth International...

Dallas/Fort Worth International AirportASCE Presentation

Terminal Development Program

November, 2009

ASCE PRESENTATION, NOVEMBER 2009

BackgroundObjective

The objective of today’s presentation1. Review the findings of the VFR2030 Master

Plan2. Present the recommended alternative for

terminal development3. Inform the Board of the anticipated terminal

development implementation strategy4. High level review of other significant Capital

Projects affecting DFW (time permitting)Non-Central Terminal AreaRegional RailDFW ConnectorParking Control SystemGeneral Aviation

2


3

BackgroundVFR 2030 Timeline

Master PlanProgramming & Schematic Design

ConstructionDesign

MASTER PLAN: June 2007 – September 2009Holistic approach to future developmentIn concert with AirlinesCentral Terminal Area (CTA) components

Identified recommended alternative for re-life of Terminals A, B, C and E, including garages and roadways$1.5 - $2.0 billion

Non-Central Terminal Area (Non-CTA) componentsIdentified future improvements for non-terminal facilities, including airfield, support facilities, ground transportation, etc.$0.6 - $1.0 billion over next 10 years

3


4

Review of Purpose and Need

Entering new era in Airport’s lifecycle that requires a new long-range vision

Aging infrastructure35-year-old terminal systemsImprove operational efficiencies

Changes in aviation industryFocus on operational efficiency and cost reductionsEnhanced security requirementsIncrease non-airline revenue generationEmpowering customers and employees

Competitive landscapeRepeal of Wright Amendment in 2014Local and other hub airports have already begun their airport renewal programs

DFW • 18,000 acres• 7 runways• 6 million ft2 terminal space

4


5

Background Aviation Industry Perspective

Airport Program Est. CostDallas Love Field New Terminal, Apron, APM $900 million

Atlanta New Terminal, Runway, CONRAC, Garage and Terminal Renovation

$6 billion

Houston Intercontinental

Terminals, Airfield $1.2 billion

LaGuardia Terminal Expansion $1.3 billion

Sacramento New Terminal and Renovation $1.27 billion

Los Angeles Terminal Expansion $1.8 billion

San Diego Terminal Expansion $1 billion

JFK Terminal, Airfield $1.4 billion

Chicago O’Hare Terminal, Airfield Expansion $3 billion – Phase 1$12 billion - Total

San Francisco Terminal Renovation $475 million5


6

DFW Core Obligations

Maintain safe and operationally reliable facilities Meet changing regulatory and renewal requirementsLong-term sustainable investments

Reduce cost per square foot to operateIncrease revenue

6


7

Terminal DevelopmentCentral Terminal Area Components

TerminalsAnalyzed new Terminal vs. re-life existingEstablished base requirements vs. wantsTiered development approach

BaselineRenovationRe-development

Baggage Handling SystemWorked with airlines to improve efficiencies

LandsideTerminal Access RoadwaysCurbsParking Garages

Replacement vs. Repair/Renovation

7


8

Terminal Development (cont)Central Terminal Area - Recommended Hybrid Alternative for Terminal A,B,C,E

Selected Elements of Highest Value from each short listed alternative$1.5 - $2.0 billion*Replace building systems Ensure operational reliability Address code and regulatory requirementsReplace landside escalators with high capacity elevatorsReconfigure ticketing areas to enhance self-serviceExpand/reconfigure security screening checkpoints to improve operational efficiencyEnhance concessions Accommodate parking demandReplace finishes in public areas

•Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate – 2009 dollarsNumbers are Preliminary and subject to Airline Negotiations

8


Terminal Development (cont)Central Terminal Area – Hybrid Alternative Key Facts

Terminals A, B, C and E Re-life – 30 year investment60-70% required to replace aging infrastructure and meet DFW core obligations

Replace building systemsAddress regulatory and code requirementsImproved ticketing, security checkpoints, and baggage handling systems to enhance operational efficiencies

Balance relates to finishes, passenger amenity improvements, and elements that produce positive business resultsConcession revenue will be enhanced by strategically grouping at key passenger circulation points

9


10

Recommended Alternative for Terminal A, B, C, and EBuilding System Replacement

Systems RenewalHVACElevatorsFire protectionVoice evacuation

Ensure operational reliability Gain energy efficiencySustainability

10


Recommended Alternative for Terminal A, B, C, and E (cont)Terminal Landside

Emphasize main Terminal entriesNew vertical core with high capacity elevatorsCurbside enhancements could include:

New entry canopyCover pedestrian crossing at main entrancesSignage

Garage refurbishment and replacement

11


Recommended Alternative for Terminal A, B, C, and E (cont)Departure Hall

Reconfigure ticketing areasIncorporate new self-service technologiesProvide premium check-inIncrease passenger flowsCreate sense of place Increase natural light

12


Reconfigured Entry, ATO Hall, Security Checkpoint

13


Recommended Alternative for Terminal A, B, C, and E (cont)Security Checkpoint

Consolidate and expand checkpointIncorporate TSA future technology requirementsRolling out improved technology to improve passenger flowSystems back-up support

14


Recommended Alternative for Terminal A, B, C, and E (cont)Concessions

Create concessions groups at key passenger circulation pointsEnhance revenue generationIntegrate revenue seating with gate lounge seatingCreate sense of placeIncrease natural light

15


16

We are moving forward in conjunction with the Airlines to advance the program schedule Identifying Terminal renovation program stand-alone projects that have no “throw away” elementsEnabling projects could include:

Eagle bag building demolitionAirside gate improvements (Safe Gate)Bag system connectionGate modifications (winglets)Bag screen matrixTerminal E – garage “B” section replacementTerminal link roadwaysGarage repairsElevator and escalator coresITS backbone and electrical rooms

Implementation Strategy for Terminal DevelopmentEnabling Projects

16


DFW Approach – Triple Bottom Line – Proven Success

Stakeholder Engagement (DFW and Airlines)

Contractor Engagement

• Early Stakeholder Collaboration – C3

• Clear Objectives

• Trust-Based Teams

• Alternatives Analysis

• Sustainability Review

• Cost/Phasing/Schedules

• Project Delivery Strategy

Contractor Engagement

FEEDBACK

Triple Bottom Line

Impact of project/program on:• Finance

• cost/revenue• Environmental

• minimize footprint• maximum output for minimum

effort• Social/Operational

• efficiency• quality

Programming & Schematic Design

Design ConstructionPerformanceVerification Closeout Lessons

Learned

17


18

Implementation Strategy for Terminal Development (cont)Next Steps

PROGRAMMING AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN : September 2009 – March 2010Programming and schematic design will be done for Terminals A, B, C and ERefine selected elements from Terminal Master Plan to establish scope and budget for design6 months to complete per terminalBegin M/WBE outreach program to educate minority community about the programAnticipated OBA requests requiring funding:

The Airport intends to engage the URS/LGG team for this Programming effort.

Master Plan ConstructionDesignProgramming & Schematic Design

September 2009 Terminals A,B and C $20-$22 million

October 2009 Terminal E $7-$9 million

18


Implementation Strategy for Terminal Development (cont)Elements of Programming and Schematic Design

Planning / programming of program elementsExisting conditions assessmentPrioritization of program elementsDevelopment of master scheduleDevelopment of formal program cost estimateConcessions master planIdentify funding sourcesDevelopment of scopesEnvironmental review processSustainability programCommunications planCommunity / contractor outreach

19


20

DESIGN: March 2010 – December 2010Prepare required Construction documents9-12 months to complete per TerminalAccelerate replacement of the URS/LGG teamThe Airport intends to engage existing/future professional service teams for Terminal design

Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October/November 2009OBA approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 2009

Expand M/WBE outreach program


DesignMaster Plan ConstructionDesignProgramming & Schematic Design

Design

20


Financing Terminal Development Plan – VERY PRELIMINARYDFW is still negotiating with the Airlines, so all numbers are subject to change

Capital Plan range (ten years)Terminal Redevelopment Plan $1.5B to $2.0BOther Capital $0.6B to $1.0B, net of AIP funding

Funding sources include (ten years):Beginning cash $250MFrom Airport operations $350M to $600MNatural Gas $0 - $250MOther sources, e.g., TxDOT $0 to $75MNew PFCs $0 to $600MDebt financing $0.75B to $2.0B

DFW plans to issue some new money debt in FY 2010Reimbursement resolution in place - $190MTake advantage of “AMT Holiday”$300M to $500M is likely unless AMT Holiday is extended, then less

21


22

Master Plan ConstructionDesignProgramming & Schematic Design


CONSTRUCTION: February 2011 – December 2017

Anticipated start for Terminal A renovation weekend after Super Bowl Typically, 1/3 of a terminal section will be closed at a time

Each Terminal section will take approximately 9 to 12 months to complete

Focus on minimal impact to existing operationsGarage renovations will be done while adjacent Terminal sections are closedSignificant work complete by the end of 2014 for Terminal A, with substantial program completion by the end of 2017Timing for remaining terminals will be based on financing planMaximize M/WBE outreach program efforts

TERMINAL A

TERMINAL E

TERMINAL B

TERMINAL C

2011 2014 2017

POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING

22


Implementation Strategy for Terminal Development (cont)Summary

Launch Terminal Development Programming and DesignTerminals A, B, and C September OBA $22MTerminal E October OBA $9MConstruction Manager at Risk Solicitation October

Conduct M/WBE outreach to maximize awareness of opportunities in Design and Construction

Board Review of Program OctoberInitiation of Program Post Board Review

Develop flexible implementation schedule to identify enabling project elementsBoard Review of Enabling Project Elements TBDInitiation of Process / Implementation of Projects Post Board Review

Initiate non-Central Terminal Area Program 1st QTR CY2010Board Review and Approval of Projects TBDCommencement of individual Projects 1st QTR 2010 (first Projects)

23


Implementation Strategy for Terminal Development (cont)Board Strategic Review of Following Programs

Program Management Strategy Late 2009M/WBE Participation in Design / Construction Late 2009Financing Plan Early 2010Audit Strategy Early 2010Safety Program Spring 2010Insurance Program Spring 2010Quarterly Board Updates

Operations Committee Briefing Starts in November

24

Note: Dates indicate approximate timeframe that Program needs to be initiated



November, 2009


Other Significant Capital Programs

November, 2009


27

Non-Central Terminal Area ComponentsOverview

$.6 - $1.0B – 10yr Capital Program66% renewal 34% expansion

Major ComponentsAirfield Non-TDP Terminal Roads/Bridges, Rail, Skylink Utilities Non-TDP Parking Commercial DevelopmentEnvironmental Information TechnologySafety and SecurityOther

27


28

Non-Central Terminal Area Components (cont)Capital Development Program - Breakdown

Non-CTA Component Renewal Expansion Total

Airfield $136,000 $36,440 $172,440

Non-TDP Terminals $73,000 $63,600 $136,600

Roads/Bridges, Rail, Skylink $72,100 $68,000 $140,100

Utilities $59,900 $39,000 $98,900

Non-TDP Parking $111,400 $200 $111,600

Commercial Development $17,200 $62,600 $79,800

Environmental $12,800 $600 $13,400

Information Technology $64,900 $12,500 $77,400

Safety and Security $61,100 $9,500 $70,600

Other $66,800 $51,000 $117,800

Total $675,200 $343,440 $1,018,640

($ in thousands)

Numbers are preliminary, subject to airline negotiations 28


29

Non-Central Terminal Area Components (cont)Projects

AirfieldNeed for 8th runway beyond 2030Pavement renewal program needed

Other Study efforts Utility Master Plan underway

Develop comprehensive utility plan at the AirportDetermine utility needs to accommodate growth

Consolidated Receiving/Distribution underwayImprove receiving and distribution operationImprove security of goods and services

Hydrology Study underwayAddress storm water movement and distribution issues at DFW

Regional Rail ServiceDFW Connector

29



November, 2009

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport ASCE Presentation · Dallas/Fort Worth International...

Documents

Transcript of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport ASCE Presentation · Dallas/Fort Worth International...