DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA MONTHLY BULLETIN Issue #35...Daf HaYomi B’Halacha For more information...

6
888-5-DIRSHU | 212 SECOND STREET, SUITE 404B | LAKEWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08701 DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA MONTHLY BULLETIN בס”דIssue #35 May one spend more than a fifth of one’s assets for the sake of supporting Torah? May one borrow furniture from a beis haknesses for personal use? May part of the men’s section of a beis haknesses be converted for use as an ezras noshim (women’s section)? Does an ohel (mausoleum) erected over a tzadik’s grave have the sanctity of a beis haknesses? May one lean on the cloth spread over the bimah? Why was an extra cloth spread upon the bimah during keriyas hatorah at the Chazon Ish’s minyan? Topics relevant to the material learned this month in Daf HaYomi B’Halacha 1 Learning Hilchos Bais Hakneses סימן קנג סעיף ו – סימן קנח סעיף ו אב תשע”ו:

Transcript of DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA MONTHLY BULLETIN Issue #35...Daf HaYomi B’Halacha For more information...

  • 88

    8-5

    -DIR

    SHU

    |

    21

    2 SE

    CON

    D S

    TR

    EET,

    SU

    ITE

    40

    4B

    |

    LA

    KEW

    OO

    D, N

    EW J

    ERSE

    Y 0

    870

    1

    DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA MONTHLY BULLETIN

    בס”ד

    Issue #35

    May one spend more than a fifth of one’s assets for the sake of supporting Torah?

    May one borrow furniture from a beis haknesses for personal use?

    May part of the men’s section of a beis haknesses be converted for use as an ezras noshim (women’s section)?

    Does an ohel (mausoleum) erected over a tzadik’s grave have the sanctity of a beis haknesses?

    May one lean on the cloth spread over the bimah?

    Why was an extra cloth spread upon the bimah during keriyas hatorah at the Chazon Ish’s minyan?

    Topics relevant to the material learned this month in Daf HaYomi B’Halacha

    1

    Learning Hilchos Bais Hakneses

    אב תשע”ו: סימן קנג סעיף ו – סימן קנח סעיף ו

  • May one spend more than a fifth of one’s assets for the sake of supporting Torah?

    The Shulchan Aruch (153:6) writes that although a beis

    haknesses may not be sold for most other charities, it may be

    sold in order to provide support for students who learn Torah.

    This rule applies to all sacred articles, even a Sefer Torah. The

    Mishnah Berurah (§23) explains that this is derived from the

    Gemara which prohibits the sale of a Sefer Torah “except to

    study Torah and for marriage,” which implies that for the sake

    of studying Torah one may sell a Sefer Torah, and concludes by

    observing that this should serve as a clear rebuke to those who

    do not support Torah study.

    Another case in which the support of Torah study is an

    exception to a rule governing other charities is pointed out by

    the Chofetz Chaim in his Sefer Ahavas Chesed (vol. 2, 20:4)

    regarding the limitation that “One who distributes should not

    distribute more than a fifth of his assets,” from which the Shitah

    Mekubetzes (Kesuvos 50a) excludes support of Torah study.

    The Chofetz Chaim explains the reason one may spend more

    for support of Torah study is because by means of his support

    he acquires the merit of the Torah studied in proportion to the

    measure of his support. [See Iggros Moshe (Yo”D vol. 4, 37),

    where Rav Moshe Feinstein discusses at length the mitzvah to

    support Torah and categorically distinguishes it from charity;

    according to his understanding, supporting Torah with less than

    half one’s income is lacking respect to the Torah.]

    The Chofetz Chaim writes in his Sefer Likutei Halachos (Yoma

    35a) that the permission to spend more than a fifth of one’s

    assets to support Torah study applies also to one’s own studies.

    If he is unable to learn on his own and hiring a tutor costs more

    than a fifth of his assets, he is still required to spend it for the sake

    of studying Torah. He adds that one is required to hire a tutor

    even if he can only afford it by depriving his family of luxuries

    and restricting his expenses to basic necessities. The reason is

    that the mitzvah of learning Torah obligates him to study the

    entire Torah and is necessary for eternal life [more than any other

    mitzvah]. He deduces this from the Gemara which states that

    the example set by Hillel must be followed. The Gemara relates

    that Hillel was exceedingly poor, earned merely one coin per day,

    limited his household expenses to half his wages, and spent the

    other half to be able to study Torah.

    Is it permitted to borrow furniture from a beis haknesses for personal use?

    The Shulchan Aruch (153:7) writes regarding the sanctity of a

    beis haknesses, that there is a difference between a village and

    a large city. Under certain circumstances, a village may sell their

    beis haknesses with the consent of all its citizens, but a large city

    may not. Since a village rarely has visitors, its beis haknesses is

    deemed the property of the village and is subject to their decision.

    However a large city is often visited by travelers from abroad and

    since its beis haknesses was constructed in order to be prayed in

    by Jews from all over the world, it is deemed property of all Jews

    everywhere, making it impossible to obtain consent from all its

    owners. The Shulchan Aruch clarifies that all articles of sanctity

    that apply to a beis haknesses (e.g. the bimah or the wraps of

    a Sefer Torah) obtain the status of the beis haknesses, and the

    Mishnah Berurah (§37) extends this to other property of the beis

    haknesses such as yards or the mikvah.

    In light of this, it is relevant to discuss the permissibility of

    borrowing furniture (e.g. tables and chairs) from a beis haknesses

    for purposes of a private celebration. If the beis haknesses is in

    a village and all citizens agree to that use it is permitted; but in a

    large city which is deemed to belong to all Jews it is impossible

    to obtain everyone’s consent and it might be questionable. The

    Aruch Hashulchan (154:12) writes that since the custom is that

    people do borrow such furniture for personal use it is considered

    as if an effective tnai (conditional stipulation) was made originally

    to permit it, and the furniture never attained sanctity forbidding

    such use. Rav Nissim Karelitz (Ginzei Hakodesh 13:§5) clarifies

    that this only applies to light furniture which is often used and

    can be assumed to have an implicit tnai; however heavy furniture

    which is generally limited to use in the beis haknesses may not

    be used for personal celebrations unless an explicit tnai was

    originally verbalized. Ideally, the Mishnah Berurah (154:§37)

    recommends that whenever anyone donates an item to the beis

    2

  • haknesses, or any communal purchase is made, an explicit tnai

    should be verbalized permitting mundane use.

    May part of the men’s section of a beis

    haknesses be converted for use as an ezras

    noshim (women’s section)?

    The Shulchan Aruch rules that areas in which people gather

    only occasionally to pray (e.g. courtyards) do not acquire any

    sanctity. The Mishnah Berurah (§3) adds that chambers adjoining

    a beis haknesses in a large city, which are designated for steady

    prayer use have the sanctity of a regular beis haknesses.

    However, in towns where the chambers are not designated for

    steady prayer use, but are regularly used by latecomers when

    there is insufficient room in the main sanctuary, the status of

    such chambers is uncertain. On one hand because they are only

    prayed in when the main sanctuary is crowded and the latecomer

    has no room to enter the sanctuary they can be considered as

    a courtyard of a beis haknesses which has no sanctity. On the

    other hand, although no individual prays there regularly, since

    it is regularly used when the sanctuary is crowded it can be

    considered to be designated for latecomers to pray in and might

    obtain sanctity.

    A similar uncertainty arises regarding the status of an ezras

    noshim which is designated for women to pray in. This is

    discussed by many poskim in the context of converting a portion

    of the main sanctuary of a beis haknesses for the purpose of being

    used as an ezras noshim. The Chochmas Odom (86:15) expressly

    forbids it and a similarly stringent opinion is mentioned in Shu”t

    Meishiv Davar (Kama, vol. 2, 22-23). However the Pri Megadim

    (Eishel Avrohom 151:1) mentions that “the ezras noshim which

    is prayed in” obtains the sanctity of a beis haknesses which

    forbids engaging in mundane behavior. [It is not clear whether

    the Pri Megadim refers to women praying in the ezras noshim

    and disagrees with the Chochmas Odom, or if he refers to its

    being also used by men to pray in.] However, the Meishiv Davar

    (ibid.) writes at length that the ezras noshim has the sanctity

    of a beis haknesses because women are obligated to pray, and

    permits converting even a portion of a beis hamedrash (which

    has greater sanctity than a beis haknesses) into an ezras noshim.

    The Aruch Hashulchan (154:7) also states that an ezras noshim

    has sanctity of a beis haknesses and Shu”t Minchas Yitzchok

    (vol. 1, 118:1) rules accordingly. The Mekor Chaim (151:12) remains

    uncertain regarding converting a beis haknesses into an ezras

    noshim, and Shu”t Keren Ledovid (O”ch 35 s.v. veatah) writes

    that the consensus of most acharonim is that converting a beis

    haknesses into an ezras noshim is forbidden on the grounds of

    “ein moridin mikedushah chamurah lekedushah kalah” (which

    prohibits relegating from stringent sanctity to lenient sanctity)

    [he entertains the possibility that an ezras noshim obtains a

    lesser degree of sanctity than a beis haknesses – sufficient for the

    prohibitions associated with a beis haknesses, but insufficient

    to convert a beis haknesses into an ezras noshim]. The Keren

    Ledovid suggests that if the ezras noshim was constructed in

    the airspace of the beis haknesses and its walls do not reach

    the ceiling to entirely isolate it from the beis haknesses, then all

    agree that it obtains the sanctity of the beis haknesses through

    Daf HaYomi B’Halacha

    For more information about the Daf HaYomi B’Halacha program,

    call 888-5-DIRSHU.

    To start a Daf HaYomi B’Halacha shiur in your neighborhood,

    call 732-987-3948 ext. 104 or email [email protected]

    MAGGID SHIUR: Rav Shimon Prag, shlita LOCATION: Zichron Chaim (The Villa’s Shul), CITY: LAKEWOOD, NJ

    HIGHLIGHTED SHIUR:

    Discovering a fresh nuance in the Mishna Berurah on a well-known Halacha evokes an incredible feeling of both reward and awe at the same time - awe that we were unaware of that aspect of the Halacha, yet rewarding knowing that Halacha will now be seared into our minds and hearts. Learning Dirshu Daf Yomi B’Halacha is not simply a matter of Limud HaTorah, it is basic Yiras Shomayim. – Rav Shimon Prag

    אב תשע”ו: סימן קנג סעיף ו – סימן קנח סעיף ובס”ד

  • its connection to the main sanctuary.

    Does an ohel (mausoleum) erected over a tzadik’s grave have the santity of a beis haknesses?

    The Shulchan Aruch (ibid.) rules that areas in which people

    gather only occasionally to pray do not have the sanctity of

    a beis haknesses because the prayers are only intermittent,

    and specifically mentions streets where prayers take place

    on emergency fast days. The Mishnah Berurah (§1) explains

    that on fast days, there were too many people to fit within the

    beis haknesses and it was necessary to pray outside. The Biur

    Halachah (s.v. rachavah) explains that even though the street is

    designated for the fast day prayers it does not obtain sanctity

    since they occur only intermittently.

    The Acharonim raise the issue of an apparent inconsistency

    between this halachah and the status of a beis haknesses which

    was designated for intermittent usage. The Shulchan Aruch

    (153:8) rules that once a permanent beis haknesses becomes

    sanctified it remains so forever, but if it was designated for

    sporadic use then it is only sanctified according to its designation.

    The Mishnah Berurah (§52) offers an example of a beis

    haknesses that was designated for permanent use during Yomim

    Tovim that obtains sanctity for the duration of Yom Tov. What is

    the difference between a beis haknesses which was designated

    for permanent intermittent use as a beis haknesses and streets

    which are designated for intermittent prayers on fast days?

    Shu”t Chavos Yair (59) explains that prayers are not recited in

    the street on fast days in order to designate the street as a place

    of sanctity. They are recited outside in order to arouse feelings of

    repentance by tasting exile or by displaying public humiliation,

    as explained in the Gemara (Taanis 16a). Therefore the street

    does not acquire any sanctity. On the other hand, a place that is

    designated for sanctity, even if only intermittently, acquires the

    sanctity of a beis haknesses.

    Shu”t Maharash Engil (vol. 1, 63) offers another distinction.

    He explains that even during the fast day prayers, other use of

    the streets is not intended to be excluded; therefore they do not

    become sanctified. But when a beis haknesses is designated for

    intermittent use, the intention is that during the prayer no other

    activities be performed there; therefore it becomes sanctified.

    Based upon this distinction he writes that an ohel erected above

    a tzadik’s grave does not acquire sanctity, since its construction

    was to honor the tzadik and not to exclude other activities, even

    if prayers are regularly recited there.

    Is it permitted to lean on the cloth spread over the bimah?

    Adornments or other articles which serve holy items such as

    a Sefer Torah or tefillin are referred to as tashmishei kedushah and

    may not be used for mundane purposes as stated in the Shulchan

    Aruch (154:3); it is even forbidden to use them for a holy purpose

    if it is for a lesser sanctity (e.g. a Sefer Torah’s tashmish kedushah

    being used for tefillin, which have less sanctity). The Shulchan

    Aruch mentions that the bimah is an example of tashmishei

    kedushah. The Mishnah Berurah (§6) clarifies that only articles

    which directly serve the holy items are tashmishei kedushah,

    but articles that serve tashmishei kedushah are referred to as

    tashmish detashmish kedushah and may be used for mundane

    purposes. However, the bimah is still deemed a tashmish

    4

    7

    בבליתאריך יוםניסן†≠†אייר

    אבגדהושאבגדהוש

    †נא קידושין†נב קידושין†נג קידושין†נד קידושין†נה קידושין†נו קידושין†נז קידושין†נח קידושין†נט קידושין†ס קידושיןקידושין†סאקידושין†סב†סג קידושיןקידושין†סד

    דף†היומי†בהלכה†©משנה†ברורה®

    ßעד†סעיף†ט†ßולא†יענה†אמן†יתומה߆ßמסימן†קכ¢ד†אמצע†סעיף†חמסעיף†ט߆עד†סימן†קכ¢ה

    ßוכן†מנענעים߆ßמתחילת†סימן†קכ¢ה†עד†אמצע†סעיף†בßואם†היה߆עד†סימן†קכ¢ו†אמצע†הסעיף†ßוכן†מנענעים߆מאמצע†הסעיף

    מאמצע†הסעיף†ßואם†היה߆עד†סימן†קכ¢ז

    †קכ¢ז †סימן †עד ßח† †סעיף †אמצע †קכ¢ד †מסימן חזרה 

    מתחילת†סימן†קכ¢ז†עד†סימן†קכ¢ח†©סיום†חלק†ראשון®ßמתחילת†סימן†קכ¢ח †עד†סעיף†ב

    ßעד†סעיף†ה†ßמסעיף†בßוהלוי߆ßעד†אמצע†סעיף†ו†ßמסעיף†הßעד†סעיף†ט†ßוהלוי߆ßמאמצע†סעיף†ו

    ßקכ¢ח†סעיף†ט† †עד†סימן †קכ¢ז חזרה†מתחילת†סימן

    מוסר

    †ניסן כ¢גכ¢ד†ניסןכ¢ה†ניסן†ניסן כ¢ו†ניסן כ¢זכ¢ח†ניסןכ¢ט††ניסן†ניסן ßל†אייר ßא†אייר ßב†אייר ßג†אייר ßד†אייר ßה†אייר † ßו

    ßוזהו߆ †עד ßהדבר† †ßכן  ßו†  פרקßו† †פרק †סוף †עד ßוזהו߆  ßו†  פרק

    ßוגם†הוא߆עד†ßפרק†ז ßוהיא†גדולה߆עד†ßוגם†הוא߆ßפרק†ז ßומי†שמעלים߆עד†ßוהיא†גדולה߆ßפרק†ז ßועל†כן߆עד†ßומי†שמעלים߆ßפרק†ז ßאחי† †ßודע †עד ßכן† †ßועל ßז†  פרקßומה†טוב߆עד†ßודע†אחי߆ ßפרק†ז ®ßסוף†חלק†א©†ßעד†סוף†פרק†ז†ßומה†טוב߆ßפרק†ז ßוכמו†דאיתא߆עד†ßפרק†א†ßשמירת†הלשון†חלק†ב ßוסיים†הכתוב߆עד†ßוכמו†דאיתא߆ßפרק†א ßוגם†צריך߆עד†ßוסיים†הכתוב߆ ßפרק†א  פרק†א߆ ßוגם†צריך߆עד†סוף†פרק†אßולמה†הדבר†דומה߆עד† ßפרק†ב 

    5 / 1 / 1 6

    5 / 2 / 1 6

    5 / 3 / 1 6

    5 / 4 / 1 6

    5 / 5 / 1 6

    5 / 6 / 1 6

    5 / 7 / 1 6

    5 / 8 / 1 6

    5 / 9 / 1 6

    5/10/16

    5/11/16

    5/12/16

    5/13/16

    5/14/16

    14

    בבליתאריך יוםאב

    אבגדהושאבגדהוש

    בבא†קמא†סחבבא†קמא†סטבבא†קמא†עבבא†קמא†עאבבא†קמא†עבבבא†קמא†עגבבא†קמא†עדבבא†קמא†עהבבא†קמא†עובבא†קמא†עזבבא†קמא†עחבבא†קמא†עטבבא†קמא†פבבא†קמא†פא

    דף†היומי†בהלכה†©משנה†ברורה®

    ßמילי† †ßוהני †הסעיף †אמצע †עד †קנßßב מתחילת†סימןמאמצע†הסעיף†ßוהני†מילי߆עד†סימן†קנßßג

    ßג†עד†סעיף†הßßמתחילת†סימן†קנßעד†סעיף†ו†ßמסעיף†ה

    ßמßßומ߆ßעד†אמצע†סעיף†ז†ßמסעיף†ו

    ßמßßומ߆ßג†אמצע†סעיף†זßßב†עד†סימן†קנßßחזרה†מתחילת†סימן†קנ 

    ßוהוא†הדין߆עד†אמצע†הסעיף†ßמßßומ߆ßג†אמצע†סעיף†זßßמסימן†קנßכל†דבר߆עד†אמצע†הסעיף†ßוהוא†הדין߆מאמצע†הסעיףßוכיון߆ †ח †סעיף †עד ßדבר† †ßכל †הסעיף מאמצע

    ßעד†סעיף†י†ßוכיון߆מאמצע†הסעיףßאסור† †ßאבל †יßßא †סעיף †אמצע †עד ßי† מסעיףחזרה†מסימן†קנßßג†אמצע†סעיף†ז߆ßומßßמ߆עד†אמצע†סעיף

    ßאבל†אסור߆אßßי

    מוסר

    †אב † † ßג†אב † ßד†אב † ßה†אב † † ßו†אב † † ßז†אב † ßח†אב † ßטי߆††††אבי¢א†אבי¢ב††אבי¢ג†††אבי¢ד††אב†אב ט¢וט¢ז†אב

    ßמעט† ßונצייר † †עד †כ¢ו  פרקßוזהו†מה߆עד†ßונצייר†מעט߆פרק†כ¢ו ßוהנה†אמרו߆עד†ßוזהו†מה߆פרק†כ¢ו  פרק†כ¢ו†ßוהנה†אמרו߆עד†סוף†פרק†כ¢ו

    ßוהנה†טוב߆פרק†כ¢ז†עד ßכלל†הדברים߆עד†ßוהנה†טוב߆פרק†כ¢ז ßומה†יפה߆עד†ßכלל†הדברים߆פרק†כ¢ז ßוהנה†ידוע߆עד†ßומה†יפה߆פרק†כ¢ז  פרק†כ¢ז†ßוהנה†ידוע߆עד†סוף†פרק†כ¢ז†כ¢ח †פרק †סוף †עד †כ¢ח  פרקßהטענה† †ßועל †עד †כ¢ט  פרקßואם†לא߆עד†ßועל†הטענה߆פרק†כ¢ט ßובאמת߆עד†ßואם†לא߆פרק†כ¢ט †הג¢ה †עד ßובאמת߆ †כ¢ט פרק

    8 / 7 / 1 6

    8 / 8 / 1 6

    8 / 9 / 1 6

    8/10/16

    8/11/16

    8/12/16

    8/13/16

    8/14/16

    8/15/16

    8/16/16

    8/17/16

    8/18/16

    8/19/16

    8/20/16

    15

    בבלי יוםאב

    אבגדהושאבגדהוש

    בבא†קמא†פבבבא†קמא†פגבבא†קמא†פדבבא†קמא†פהבבא†קמא†פובבא†קמא†פזבבא†קמא†פחבבא†קמא†פטבבא†קמא†צבבא†קמא†צאבבא†קמא†צבבבא†קמא†צגבבא†קמא†צדבבא†קמא†צה

    דף†היומי†בהלכה†©משנה†ברורה®

    מסימן†קנßßג†אמצע†סעיף†יßßא†ßאבל†אסור߆עד†סעיף†יßßדמסעיף†יßßד†עד†סעיף†יßßחמסעיף†יßßח†עד†סעיף†כßßאמסעיף†כßßא†עד†סימן†קנßßד

    ßד†עד†סעיף†גßßמתחילת†סימן†קנחזרה†מסימן†קנßßג†אמצע†סעיף†יßßא†ßאבל†אסור߆עד†סימן

    ßד†סעיף†גßßקנßודווקא߆ †הסעיף †אמצע †עד †ג †סעיף †קנßßד מסימןßופרוכת߆ ßעד†אמצע†סעיף†ו† ßודווקא߆אמצע†הסעיף

    ßעד†סעיף†ט†ßופרוכת߆ßמאמצע†סעיף†וßמומר߆אßßעד†אמצע†סעיף†י†ßמסעיף†טמאמצע†הסעיף†ßמומר߆עד†סעיף†טßßו

    חזרה†מסימן†קנßßד†סעיף†ג߆עד†סעיף†טßßו

    מוסר

    ††אב י¢ז††אב י¢ח†אב י¢ט†††אב † ßככ¢א†אב†אב כ¢בכ¢ג††אבכ¢ד††אבכ¢ה††אבכ¢ו†††אבכ¢ז†††אבכ¢ח††אבכ¢ט††אב†אב † † ßל

    פרק†כ¢ט†הג¢ה†עד†סוף†פרק†כ¢טßוהנה†ידוע߆עד† ßפרק†ל

    ßועתה†נדבר߆עד†ßוהנה†ידוע߆ßפרק†לßועתה†נדבר†אודות߆עד†ßועתה†נדבר߆ßפרק†לßועל†ידי߆עד†ßועתה†נדבר†אודות߆ßפרק†לßובדרך†כלל߆עד†ßועל†ידי߆ßפרק†לßועל†כולם߆עד†ßובדרך†כלל߆ßפרק†לßעד†סוף†פרק†ל†ßועל†כולם߆ßפרק†לßועל†כן߆עד†ßחתימת†הספר†פרק†אßועתה†נבוא߆עד†ßועל†כן߆ ßחתימת†הספר†פרק†אßעוד†ידוע߆עד†ßועתה†נבוא߆ ßפרק†אßידוע†מה߆עד†ßעוד†ידוע߆ ßפרק†אßכשמתפלל߆עד†ßידוע†מה߆ ßפרק†אßובפרט߆עד†ßכשמתפלל߆ ßפרק†א

    תאריך

    8/21/16

    8/22/16

    8/23/16

    8/24/16

    8/25/16

    8/26/16

    8/27/16

    8/28/16

    8/29/16

    8/30/16

    8/31/16

    9 / 1 / 1 6

    9 / 2 / 1 6

    9 / 3 / 1 6

  • it is a tashmish detashmish, but because of the Terumas

    Hadeshen’s opinion mentioned by the Rema (154:8)

    that where the custom is to permit mundane usage of

    tashmishei kedushah and it is difficult to refrain from it, it

    is considered as if an unspoken stipulated condition (“lev

    beis din masneh aleihem”) permitted it. Since the Terumas

    Hadeshen specifically mentions using the bimah, the

    Mishnah Berurah permitted it. However, in accordance with

    what the Mishnah Berurah (154:§36) writes that whatever

    is not clearly permitted by custom cannot be assumed

    to be included in the condition, since the cloth was not

    mentioned by the Terumas Hadeshen it is forbidden to

    lean on it. The Az Nidberu suggests that the reason for this

    distinction is that this leniency only applies to common use

    from which it is difficult to refrain. Since the bimah was not

    always covered with a cloth [it was spread out when the

    Torah was read and removed afterward, as described by

    the Mishnah Berurah (148:§2)] it was not so difficult to

    5

    Lomdei Dirshu Daf HaYomi B’Halacha L’Bachurim participating in the weekly chazara questions at Camp Tashabar in the Catskills, NY

    kedushah although it is usually covered by a cloth, as the

    Mishnah Berurah (§10) mentions, the Gemara states that

    since the bimah is occasionally used without the cloth it

    serves the actual Sefer Torah. The Shaar Hatziyun (§8)

    explains that even though nowadays the bimah is never

    used without the cloth, since the cloth might move and the

    bimah might be exposed while the Sefer Torah lies upon it,

    it is still deemed a tashmish kedushah.

    The Mishnah Berurah (141:§4) warns the baal koyrei

    and the one who gets the aliyah not to lean on the cloth

    that is spread over the bimah while reading (even when

    he is permitted to lean during keriyas hatorah, such as if

    he is sick or aged, because it is a tashmish kedushah.

    However he permits leaning on the uncovered bimah,

    presumably because it is deemed a tashmish detashmish,

    which seems to contradict the Gemara. Shu”t Az Nidberu

    (vol. 3, 49) resolves this by explaining that the Mishnah

    Berurah did not permit leaning upon the bimah because

    אב תשע”ו: סימן קנג סעיף ו – סימן קנח סעיף ובס”ד

    5

  • DirshuTHE WORLD OF

    DAF YOMI BAVLIKinyan TorahChazaras HaShas Chazarah Chodshi Kinyan HaShas Weekly Tests Mishnayos Tests

    KOLLELIMBa’alei Batim KollelimChaburas Beis Medrash GovohaAmud YomiKollel BokerChaburas Shas B’Iyun

    HALACHADaf HaYomi B’Halacha Kinyan Halacha Kinyan Shmittah

    YESHIVA PROGRAMSDaf HaYomi B’Halacha L’Bochurim Dirshu BokerTalmudo B’YadoiMekadshei SheviyiYeshivas Bein Hazemanim

    DIRSHU PUBLICATIONSMishnah Berurah

    Mahaduras Dirshu Sefer Chofetz Chaim

    Mahaduras Dirshu Sefer Shemiras HalashonDirshu Shul Chumash

    with RambanMa’areh Mekomos

    on Hilchos Shabbos Kinyan Halacha KovetzKuntresai ChizukKinyan ShmaatsaOhel Series

    ACHEINU3-Step System:

    Mentoring, Enrollment & Continued Follow-Up

    Acheinu YeshivosBatei ChizukInternational Kiruv Conference

    Bot

    tom

    Lin

    e M

    G:

    718.

    377.

    4567JOIN THOUSANDS WHO LEARN DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA

    AND MASTER THE HALACHOS OF DAILY LIVING!For more information or to receive a free pocket luach, call 888-5-DIRSHU, press 1 for English, then 2 for Daf HaYomi B’Halacha.

    For dedication opportunities please call 732-987-3948 ext. 105 or email [email protected].

    refrain from using the cloth as it was from using the bimah, so the

    condition only permits the bimah. Nowadays the bimah is always

    covered with the cloth, and the custom to permit such use of the

    bimah extends to permit using the cloth as well.

    Why was an extra cloth spread upon the bimah during keriyas hatorah in the Chazon Ish’s minyan?

    In light of the above, placing seforim or siddurim upon a bimah

    might seem to be problematic. Rav Isser Zalman Meltzer (quoted

    in Shu”t Rivevos Efrayim vol. 1, 118:1) justified the popular custom

    to be lenient, based upon the opinion of the Rema (154:8) that

    there is an unspoken stipulated condition (“lev beis din masneh

    aleihem”) permitting tashmishei kedushah to be used for common

    mundane purposes when it is difficult to refrain from doing so. Since

    the custom is to place seforim upon the bimah and it is difficult to

    refrain from this, it is included in the uses permitted by the condition.

    Nevertheless, the Mishnah Berurah (§37) states that this opinion

    may only be relied upon in case of need, and recommends that when

    donating an article for sanctified use, an explicit tnai should be made

    permitting mundane use.

    The custom at the Chazon Ish’s minyan (Dinim Vehanhagos 5:8)

    was to spread an extra cloth over the bimah whenever the Sefer

    Torah was placed upon it in addition to the regular cloth that was

    always spread over the bimah. Rav Nissim Karelitz (Ginzei Hakodesh

    5:§44) explains that the purpose was in order that the regular cloth

    not be considered as serving the Sefer Torah and would only attain

    status as a tashmish detashmish which is permitted to be used for

    mundane purposes even without a tnai.

    Interestingly, Shu”t Ohr Letziyon (vol. 2, 45:62) mentions that

    even when the halachah permits using a bimah, it is preferable not

    to use it in any mundane manner because it appears disrespectful.

    6

    באו והשתתפו עם לומדי דף היומי בהלכה! 888-5-DIRSHU נא לצלצל