Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

download Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

of 14

Transcript of Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    1/14

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782

    Analysis of Behaviour of Soils Under CyclicLoading Using EPR-based Finite Element

    Method

     ARTICLE  in  FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN · OCTOBER 2012

    Impact Factor: 2.02 · DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005

    CITATIONS

    5

    READS

    179

    3 AUTHORS:

    Akbar Javadi

    University of Exeter

    102 PUBLICATIONS  696 CITATIONS 

    SEE PROFILE

    Asaad Faramarzi

    University of Birmingham

    30 PUBLICATIONS  133 CITATIONS 

    SEE PROFILE

    Alireza Ahangar-Asr

    University of Salford

    25 PUBLICATIONS  81 CITATIONS 

    SEE PROFILE

    All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate,

    letting you access and read them immediately.

    Available from: Asaad Faramarzi

    Retrieved on: 31 March 2016

    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akbar_Javadi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akbar_Javadi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asaad_Faramarzi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asaad_Faramarzi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_1https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_7https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Salford?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_6https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Ahangar-Asr?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asaad_Faramarzi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_7https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Birmingham?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_6https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asaad_Faramarzi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asaad_Faramarzi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akbar_Javadi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_7https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Exeter?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_6https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akbar_Javadi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akbar_Javadi?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240032782_Analysis_of_Behaviour_of_Soils_Under_Cyclic_Loading_Using_EPR-based_Finite_Element_Method?enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2&el=1_x_2

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    2/14

    Analysis of behaviour of soils under cyclic loading using EPR-based finite

    element method

    Akbar A. Javadi a,n, Asaad Faramarzi b,1, Alireza Ahangar-Asr a,2

    a Computational Geomechanics Group, College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK b Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK 

    a r t i c l e i n f o

     Article history:

    Received 9 April 2011Received in revised form

    17 April 2012

    Accepted 18 April 2012Available online 16 May 2012

    Keywords:

    Finite element

    Evolutionary computation

    Material modelling

    Cyclic loading

    EPR 

    a b s t r a c t

    In this paper, a new approach is presented for modelling of behaviour of soils in finite element analysis

    under cyclic loading. This involves development of a unified approach to modelling of complexmaterials using evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) and its implementation in the finite element

    method. EPR is a data mining technique that generates a clear and structured representation of 

    the system being studied. The main advantage of an EPR-based constitutive model (EPRCM) over

    conventional models is that it provides the optimum structure and parameters of the material model

    directly from raw experimental (or field) data. The development and validation of the method will be

    presented followed by the application to study of behaviour of soils under cyclic loading. The results of 

    the analyses will be compared with those obtained from standard finite element analysis using

    conventional constitutive models. It will be shown that the EPR-based models offer an effective

    and unified approach to modelling of materials with complex behaviour in finite element analysis of 

    boundary value problems.

    &  2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Finite element method has, in recent decades, been widely

    used as a powerful tool in the analysis of engineering problems. In

    this numerical analysis, the behaviour of the actual material is

    approximated with that of an idealised material that deforms

    in accordance with some constitutive relationships. Therefore, the

    choice of an appropriate constitutive model that adequately

    describes the behaviour of the material plays an important role

    in the accuracy and reliability of the numerical predictions. During

    the past few decades several constitutive models have been

    developed for various materials including soils. Among these

    models there are simple elastic models   [1], plastic models (e.g.,

    [2]), models based on critical state theory [3], and single or double

    hardening models [4,5],  etc. Most of these models involve deter-mination of material parameters, many of which have little or no

    physical meaning [6]. In conventional constitutive material mod-

    elling, an appropriate mathematical model is initially selected and

    the parameters of the model (material parameters) are identified

    from appropriate physical tests on representative samples to

    capture the material behaviour. When these constitutive models

    are used in finite element analysis, the accuracy with which theselected material model represents the various aspects of the

    actual material behaviour and also the accuracy of the identified

    material parameters affect the accuracy of the finite element

    predictions.

    In the past few years, the use of artificial neural networks

    (ANN) has been introduced as an alternative approach to con-

    stitutive modelling of materials. The application of ANN for

    modelling of the behaviour of concrete was first proposed by

    Ghaboussi et al. 1991 [7]. Ghaboussi and Sidarta [8]  presented an

    improved technique of ANN approximation for learning the

    mechanical behaviour of drained and undrained sand. Ghaboussi

    et al. 1998 and Sidarta and Ghaboussi   [9,10]   presented a new

    autoprogressive approach to train ANN constitutive model

    (autoprogressive ANN). In this approach initially, a finite elementmodel of an available experimental test (with the measured

    boundary forces and displacements) is created using a pre-trained

    ANN model as the constitutive material model. Then the mea-

    sured forces and displacements data are applied incrementally to

    the FE model and through the increments the ANN model is

    updated with more data. The data for training ANN come from the

    stresses and strains at gauss points of all elements. In this method

    the main idea is that the FE model of the experimental tests

    usually contain a large number of stresses and strains with a wide

    range of different values that can be used for training of the ANN

    model. Hashash et al.  [11]  continued and extended the autopro-

    gressive training methodology in a new framework, self learning

    Contents lists available at  SciVerse ScienceDirect

    journal homepage:  www .elsevier.com/locate/finel

    Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

    0168-874X/$ - see front matter  &  2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005

    n Corresponding author. Tel.:  þ44 1392 723640; fax:  þ44 1392 217965.

    E-mail addresses:  [email protected] (A.A. Javadi),

    [email protected] (A. Faramarzi), [email protected] (A. Ahangar-Asr).1 Tel.:  þ44 1634 883126.2 Tel.:  þ44 1392 723909.

    Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53–65

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260433539_Soil_Mechanics_and_Plastic_Analysis_or_Limit_Design?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260433539_Soil_Mechanics_and_Plastic_Analysis_or_Limit_Design?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37407273_Critical_State_Soil_Mechanics?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37407273_Critical_State_Soil_Mechanics?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437118_Elasto-Plastic_Stress-Strain_Theory_for_Cohesionless_Soil_with_Curved_Yield_Surfaces?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437118_Elasto-Plastic_Stress-Strain_Theory_for_Cohesionless_Soil_with_Curved_Yield_Surfaces?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437118_Elasto-Plastic_Stress-Strain_Theory_for_Cohesionless_Soil_with_Curved_Yield_Surfaces?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437118_Elasto-Plastic_Stress-Strain_Theory_for_Cohesionless_Soil_with_Curved_Yield_Surfaces?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222346765_On_self-learning_finite_element_codes_based_on_monitored_response_of_structures?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222346765_On_self-learning_finite_element_codes_based_on_monitored_response_of_structures?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245283898_Knowledge-Based_Modeling_of_Material_Behavior_with_Neural_Networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245283898_Knowledge-Based_Modeling_of_Material_Behavior_with_Neural_Networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245283898_Knowledge-Based_Modeling_of_Material_Behavior_with_Neural_Networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://-/?-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222138155_Constitutive_Modeling_of_Geomaterials_from_Non-uniform_Material_Tests?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222138155_Constitutive_Modeling_of_Geomaterials_from_Non-uniform_Material_Tests?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222138155_Constitutive_Modeling_of_Geomaterials_from_Non-uniform_Material_Tests?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222138155_Constitutive_Modeling_of_Geomaterials_from_Non-uniform_Material_Tests?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222409812_Systematic_update_of_deep_excavation_model_using_field_performance_data?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://www.elsevier.com/locate/finelhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/finelhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222409812_Systematic_update_of_deep_excavation_model_using_field_performance_data?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260433539_Soil_Mechanics_and_Plastic_Analysis_or_Limit_Design?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245283898_Knowledge-Based_Modeling_of_Material_Behavior_with_Neural_Networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245283898_Knowledge-Based_Modeling_of_Material_Behavior_with_Neural_Networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222138155_Constitutive_Modeling_of_Geomaterials_from_Non-uniform_Material_Tests?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437118_Elasto-Plastic_Stress-Strain_Theory_for_Cohesionless_Soil_with_Curved_Yield_Surfaces?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222346765_On_self-learning_finite_element_codes_based_on_monitored_response_of_structures?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230313668_Single_hardening_constitutive_model_for_frictional_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37407273_Critical_State_Soil_Mechanics?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227815375_Autoprogressive_training_of_neural_network_constitutive_models?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.005http://www.elsevier.com/locate/finelhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/finelhttp://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    3/14

    simulation (SelfSim), to extract soil constitutive behaviour from a

    sequence of construction stages of a braced excavation using

    measurements of lateral wall deflection and surface settlements.

    The role of autoprogressive and self-learning simulation was also

    studied by other researchers [12–19]. These works indicated that

    neural network based constitutive models can capture nonlinear

    material behaviour with a high accuracy. The developed ANN

    models are versatile and have the capacity to continuously learn

    as additional material response data become available.On the subject of studying material behaviour under cyclic and

    hysteric loading using ANNs, a few works have been reported so

    far. Furukawa and Hoffman [20]  proposed an approach to mate-

    rial modelling using neural networks, which can describe mono-

    tonic and cyclic plastic deformation and its implementation in a

    FEA system. They developed two neural networks, each of which

    was used separately to represent the back stress and the drag

    stress. After training and validation stages of neural networks

    (NNs), the neural network constitutive models (NNCMs) were

    implemented in FEA to update the stiffness matrix ( D). In this

    approach D  is made of an elastic matrix  De, and a plastic matrix

    Dp. In the proposed approach the elastic matrix was derived from

    Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio and only the plastic matrix

    was updated using the developed ANNs.

    Tsai and Hashash   [21]   showed the application of SelfSim

    method in dynamic soil behaviour. They described the imple-

    mentation of SelfSim to integrate data from field measurements

    and numerical simulations of seismic site response to obtain the

    underlying cyclic soil response. They applied the SelfSim to study

    1D seismic site response.

    Yun et al. [22] introduced an approach for ANN-based model-

    ling of the cyclic behaviour of materials. They focused on the issue

    in the hysteric behaviour of material where one strain value may

    correspond to multiple stresses and this can be a major reason

    that stops NNs from learning hysteretic and cyclic behaviour. To

    overcome this issue, they introduced two new internal variables

    in addition to the other ordinary inputs of ANN-based constitutive

    material models to help the learning of the hysteretic and cyclic

    behaviour of materials. The ANN models trained in this way were

    implemented in a FE model to analyse a boundary value problem

    (steel beam–column connection) under cyclic loading.

    Yun et al. [23] extended the ANN-based cyclic material model

    developed by   [22]   to beam–column connections by adding the

    mechanical and design parameters as inputs of the ANN model.

    Moreover Yun et al.   [24]  used self-learning simulation to char-

    acterize cyclic behaviour of beam–column connections in steel

    frames.

    Ghaboussi et al. [25] developed a hybrid modelling framework

    to analyse engineering systems. The hybrid method combines the

    mathematical models of engineered systems (derived based on

    physics and mechanical laws) with artificial neural network

    models using autoprogressive and self-learning simulation. They

    applied this hybrid method to model and analyse a steel jointunder cyclic load.

    The implementation of the ANN based constitutive models in FE

    codes has been the interest of many researchers. Shin and Pande

    [26]   used a self learning code to identify elastic constants for

    orthotropic materials from a structural test. Hashash et al.   [27]

    described some of the issues related to the numerical implementa-

    tion of NNCM in finite element analysis and derived a closed-form

    solution for material stiffness matrix for the neural network-based

    constitutive model. Jung and Ghaboussi 2006 [28] presented a rate

    dependant ANN material model for creep behaviour of concrete

    and its implementation in finite element software (ABAQUS),

    through its user material subroutine (UMAT). Kessler et al.   [29]

    demonstrated the implementation of an ANN material model in

    ABAQUS, through user subroutine VUMAT. Haj-Ali and Kim  [30]

    presented a neural network based constitutive model for fibre

    reinforced polymeric (FRP) composites. The developed ANN model

    was implemented in ABAQUS user material subroutine to analyse

    a notched composite plate with an open hole. Yun et al.   [22,23]

    also implemented the developed ANN models for materials under

    cyclic load in ABAQUS.

    The authors have also carried out extensive research on applica-

    tion of neural networks in constitutive modelling of complex

    materials in general and soils in particular. They have developedan intelligent finite element method (NeuroFE code) based on the

    incorporation of a back propagation neural network (BPNN) in finite

    element analysis (e.g., [31,32]). The intelligent finite element model

    has been applied to a wide range of boundary value problems

    including cyclic loading and has shown that ANNs can be very

    efficient in learning and generalising the constitutive behaviour of 

    complex materials [33].

    In this paper a fundamentally different approach is presented

    for constitutive modelling using Evolutionary Polynomial Regres-

    sion (EPR). In the proposed EPR approach the optimum structure

    for the material constitutive model representation and its para-

    meters are determined directly from raw data. Furthermore, it

    provides a transparent and structured representation of the

    constitutive relationships that can be readily incorporated in a

    finite element code. Javadi and Rezania [34] and Javadi et al.  [35]

    presented the application of the EPR-based constitutive models in

    material modelling under monotonic loading conditions. How-

    ever, this paper focuses on the application of the EPR-based

    constitutive models, to the simulation of behaviour of soils under

    cyclic loading and its integration in a FE model. The development

    and validation of the EPRCM and its integration in FEA are

    presented and the efficiency of the methodology is examined by

    application to the complex problem of cyclic loading of soils. It is

    shown that the proposed methodology can simulate the real

    behaviour of complex materials under cyclic loading with very

    high accuracy. The main advantages of using an EPR approach are

    highlighted.

    In what follows, the main principles of EPR will be outlined. The

    application of EPR in modelling of nonlinear constitutive relation-

    ships and the implementation of developed EPRCMs in FE analysis

    will be illustrated with two examples. An EPR will be trained with

    data from results of a synthetic triaxial cyclic loading tests. The

    trained EPR will then be incorporated into a finite element model

    which will in turn be used to analyse the behaviour of the soil

    under cyclic loading. The training and generalisation capabilities of 

    the EPR in extending the learning to cases of multiple, variable and

    irregular cycles will be investigated.

    2. Evolutionary polynomial regression

    Evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) is a data-driven

    method based on evolutionary computing, aimed to search forpolynomial structures representing a system. A general EPR 

    expression can be presented as [36]

     y ¼Xn j ¼ 1

    F ð X , f ð X Þ,a jÞþa0   ð1Þ

    where  y  is the estimated vector of output of the process;  a j   is a

    constant;   F   is a function constructed by the process;   X   is the

    matrix of input variables;   f   is a function defined by the user;

    n   is the number of terms of the target expression. The general

    functional structure represented by   F   is constructed from ele-

    mentary functions by EPR using a genetic algorithm (GA) strategy.

    The GA is employed to select the useful input vectors from  X  to be

    combined. The building blocks (elements) of the structure of  F  can

    be defined by the user based on understanding of the physical

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53 –6554

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448939_Field_calibration_of_time-dependent_behavior_in_segmental_bridges_using_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448939_Field_calibration_of_time-dependent_behavior_in_segmental_bridges_using_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448939_Field_calibration_of_time-dependent_behavior_in_segmental_bridges_using_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448939_Field_calibration_of_time-dependent_behavior_in_segmental_bridges_using_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222741786_Accurate_cyclic_plastic_analysis_using_a_neural_network_material_model?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222653903_A_novel_framework_integrating_downhole_array_data_and_site_response_analysis_to_extract_dynamic_soil_behavior?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227702927_A_design-variable-based_inelastic_hysteretic_model_for_beam-column_connections?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222653906_Self-learning_simulation_method_for_inverse_nonlinear_modeling_of_cyclic_behavior_of_connections?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231027377_Hybrid_modelling_framework_by_using_mathematics-based_and_information-based_methods?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250718694_Identification_of_elastic_constants_for_orthotropic_materials_from_structural_test?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228510022_Numerical_implementation_of_a_neural_network_based_material_model_in_finite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250692076_Characterizing_rate-dependent_material_behaviors_in_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250692076_Characterizing_rate-dependent_material_behaviors_in_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245364856_Erratum_Incorporating_Neural_Network_Material_Models_Within_Finite_Element_Analysis_for_Rheological_Behavior_Prediction?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222661318_Nonlinear_constitutive_models_for_FRP_composites_using_artificial_neural_networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632144_Neural_network_for_constitutive_modelling_in_flnite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632144_Neural_network_for_constitutive_modelling_in_flnite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632144_Neural_network_for_constitutive_modelling_in_flnite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632144_Neural_network_for_constitutive_modelling_in_flnite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226437247_Intelligent_Finite_Element_Method_and_Application_to_Simulation_of_Behavior_of_Soils_under_Cyclic_Loading?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226437247_Intelligent_Finite_Element_Method_and_Application_to_Simulation_of_Behavior_of_Soils_under_Cyclic_Loading?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807540_Intelligent_finite_element_method_An_evolutionary_approach_to_constitutive_modeling?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260125327_An_Artificial_Intelligence_Based_Finite_Element_Method?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227617016_A_new_neural_network-based_model_for_hysteretic_behavior_of_materials?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448939_Field_calibration_of_time-dependent_behavior_in_segmental_bridges_using_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231027377_Hybrid_modelling_framework_by_using_mathematics-based_and_information-based_methods?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222741786_Accurate_cyclic_plastic_analysis_using_a_neural_network_material_model?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250692076_Characterizing_rate-dependent_material_behaviors_in_self-learning_simulation?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237152444_Inverse_analysis-based_interpretation_of_sand_behavior_from_triaxial_compression_tests_subjected_to_full_end_restraint?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222653906_Self-learning_simulation_method_for_inverse_nonlinear_modeling_of_cyclic_behavior_of_connections?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228510022_Numerical_implementation_of_a_neural_network_based_material_model_in_finite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268601589_Constitutive_Soil_Behavior_Representation_via_Artificial_Neural_Networks_A_Shift_from_Soil_Models_to_Soil_Behavior_Data?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222394894_Comparison_of_two_inverse_analysis_techniques_for_learning_deep_excavation_response?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222661318_Nonlinear_constitutive_models_for_FRP_composites_using_artificial_neural_networks?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260125327_An_Artificial_Intelligence_Based_Finite_Element_Method?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222570547_Self-learning_finite_elements_for_inverse_estimation_of_thermal_constitutive_models?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250718694_Identification_of_elastic_constants_for_orthotropic_materials_from_structural_test?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226437247_Intelligent_Finite_Element_Method_and_Application_to_Simulation_of_Behavior_of_Soils_under_Cyclic_Loading?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227702927_A_design-variable-based_inelastic_hysteretic_model_for_beam-column_connections?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227702927_A_design-variable-based_inelastic_hysteretic_model_for_beam-column_connections?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222653903_A_novel_framework_integrating_downhole_array_data_and_site_response_analysis_to_extract_dynamic_soil_behavior?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240632144_Neural_network_for_constitutive_modelling_in_flnite_element_analysis?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245364856_Erratum_Incorporating_Neural_Network_Material_Models_Within_Finite_Element_Analysis_for_Rheological_Behavior_Prediction?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807540_Intelligent_finite_element_method_An_evolutionary_approach_to_constitutive_modeling?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    4/14

    processes. While the selection of feasible structures to be com-

    bined is done through an evolutionary process the parameters  a jare estimated by the least square method.

    EPR is a technique for data-driven modelling. In this technique,

    the combination of the genetic algorithm to find feasible struc-

    tures and the least square method to find the appropriate

    constants for those structures implies some advantages. In parti-

    cular, the GA allows a global exploration of the error surface

    relevant to specifically defined objective functions. By using suchobjective functions some criteria can be set in order to (i) avoid

    overfitting of models, (ii) push the models towards simpler

    structures, and (iii) avoid unnecessary terms representative of 

    the noise in data [36]. Selecting an appropriate objective function,

    assuming pre-selected elements in Eq. (1) based on engineering

     judgment, and working with dimensional information enable

    refinement of final models. Application and capability of EPR in

    modelling and analysing different civil and geotechnical engineer-

    ing problems have been investigated by the authors,   [37–39].

    Detailed explanation of the method is out of the scope of this

    paper and can be found in  [36,40].

    3. Application of EPR for modelling of material behaviour 

    In modelling using EPR, the raw experimental or in-situ test

    data are directly used for training the EPR model. In this approach,

    there are no mathematical models to select and as the EPR learns

    the constitutive relationships directly from the raw data it is the

    shortest route from experimental research to numerical model-

    ling. In this approach there are no material parameters to be

    identified and as more data become available, the material model

    can be improved by re-training of the EPR using the additional

    data. Furthermore, the incorporation of an EPR in a finite element

    procedure avoids the need for complex yield/failure functions,

    flow rules, etc. An EPR equation can be incorporated in a finite

    element code/procedure in the same way as a conventional

    constitutive model. It can be incorporated either as incremental

    or total stress–strain strategy [35]. In this study the incrementalstrategy has been successfully implemented in the EPR-based

    finite element model.

     3.1. Input and output parameters

    The choice of input and output quantities is determined by both

    the source of the data and the way the trained EPR model is to be

    used. A typical scheme to train most of the neural network based

    material models includes an input set providing the network with

    the information relating to the current state units (e.g., current

    stresses and current strains) and then a forward pass through the

    neural network yields the prediction of the next expected state of 

    stress and/or strain relevant to an input strain or stress increment [9].

    The same idea has been utilised in this work. Thus depending on theproblem and the available data, typically the mean stress   p0i,

    deviatoric stress qi, volumetric strain eiv  and shear strain eiq  are used

    as the input parameters representing the current state of stress and

    strain in a load increment   i, and the devatoric stress   qiþ1and/or

    volumetric strain   eiþ1v   corresponding to the input incrementaldeviatoric strain  Deiq  are used as the output parameters.

    The database is divided into two separate sets. One set is used

    for training to obtain the EPR model and the other one is used for

    validation to appraise the applicability of the trained model.

     3.2. EPR procedure and developed EPRCMs

    Before starting the training procedure, a number of constraints

    can be implemented to control the evolutionary process in terms

    of length of equations, type of functions used, number of terms,

    range of exponents, number of generations etc. Therefore, there is

    a potential to achieve different models for a particular problem

    which enables the user to gain additional information for differ-

    ent scenarios [40]. Applying the EPR procedure, the evolutionary

    constitutive material modelling starts from a constant mean of 

    output values. By increasing the number of evolutions it gradually

    picks up the different participating parameters in order to form

    equations representing the constitutive relationship. Each pro-posed model is trained using the training data and tested using

    the testing data. The level of accuracy at each stage is evaluated

    based on the coefficient of determination (COD), i.e., the fitness

    function as

    COD¼ 1

    PN ðY aY  pÞ

    2PN ðY að1=N Þ

    PN Y aÞ

    2  ð2Þ

    where Y a  is the actual target value;  Y  p  is the EPR predicted value;

    N  is the number of data points on which the COD is computed. If 

    the model fitness is not acceptable or the other termination

    criteria (in terms of maximum number of generations and max-

    imum number of terms) are not satisfied, the current model

    should go through another evolution in order to obtain a new

    model [40,34].

    4. Incorporating of EPRCM in FEA

    The developed EPRCMs are implemented in the widely used

    general-purpose finite element code ABAQUS through its user

    defined material module (UMAT). UMAT updates the stresses and

    provide the material Jacobian matrix for every increment in every

    integration point [41]. The manner, in which EPRCM is incorpo-

    rated in UMAT is shown in Fig. 1. In the developed methodology,

    the EPRCM replaces the role of a conventional constitutive model.

    The source of knowledge for EPR is a set of raw experimental (or

    in situ) data representing the mechanical response of the material

    to applied load. When EPR is used for constitutive description, the

    physical nature of the input–output data for the EPR is deter-mined by the measured quantities, e.g., stresses, strains, etc.

    The constitutive relationships are generally given in the

    following form [42]

    Dr¼DDe   ð3Þ

    where D  is material stiffness matrix, also known as the Jacobian.

    For an isotropic and elastic material, matrix  D  is given in terms of 

    Young’s modulus,  E , and Poisson’s ratio,  n.Therefore the function of an EPR-based constitutive model in a

    FE model (at every element’s integration point) is as follows:

    (i) For the   iþ1th load increment, the input pattern for the

    EPRCM contains (1) the values of ( p0i,

    qi,

    eiv,

    eiq) which have

    already been calculated in the previous load increment and

    (2) an arbitrary value of  Deiq. The new value of  qiþ1 and e iþ1v

    are then calculated for the next step.

    (ii) For each load increment the material Young’s modulus, E EPR ,

    and the Poisson’s ratio,   nEPR   can be calculated from therelationship between the relevant stresses and strains. For

    example for axisymetric condition:

    E EPR ¼  Dqi

    Dei1ð4Þ

    nEPR ¼   1DeivDei1

    !=2   ð5Þ

    where e1  is the axial strain.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53–65   55

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807667_An_evolutionary_based_approach_for_assessment_of_earthquake-induced_soil_liquefaction_and_lateral_displacement?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807667_An_evolutionary_based_approach_for_assessment_of_earthquake-induced_soil_liquefaction_and_lateral_displacement?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807667_An_evolutionary_based_approach_for_assessment_of_earthquake-induced_soil_liquefaction_and_lateral_displacement?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807667_An_evolutionary_based_approach_for_assessment_of_earthquake-induced_soil_liquefaction_and_lateral_displacement?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260125327_An_Artificial_Intelligence_Based_Finite_Element_Method?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260125327_An_Artificial_Intelligence_Based_Finite_Element_Method?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227815375_Autoprogressive_training_of_neural_network_constitutive_models?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227815375_Autoprogressive_training_of_neural_network_constitutive_models?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://-/?-http://-/?-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37408252_Finite_Elements_In_Plasticity_Theory_and_Practice?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235694738_A_symbolic_data-driven_technique_based_on_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229888248_An_investigation_on_stream_temperature_analysis_based_on_evolutionary_computing?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260125327_An_Artificial_Intelligence_Based_Finite_Element_Method?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37408252_Finite_Elements_In_Plasticity_Theory_and_Practice?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807667_An_evolutionary_based_approach_for_assessment_of_earthquake-induced_soil_liquefaction_and_lateral_displacement?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227815375_Autoprogressive_training_of_neural_network_constitutive_models?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235299471_A_new_approach_for_prediction_of_the_stability_of_soil_and_rock_slopes?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233807540_Intelligent_finite_element_method_An_evolutionary_approach_to_constitutive_modeling?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233694129_Modelling_mechanical_behaviour_of_rubber_concrete_using_evolutionary_polynomial_regression?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-4f930a6b-c500-42da-b5fc-0551da8f478e&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI0MDAzMjc4MjtBUzo5NzUyMDMyMzY2MTgyOEAxNDAwMjYyMDY1MjE2http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    5/14

    Therefore with  D  being recalculated in the FE procedure, the

    element stiffness matrix for every single element is updated at

    each load increment as

    Z O

    BT DBdO   ð6Þ

    where   B   is the strain matrix and   O   is the elemental area.

    Consequently the global stiffness matrix for a particular problem

    is refined for each load increment. The whole procedure ensures

    that the constitutive model follows the actual behaviour of 

    the material, both at the element level and at the global level.

    This is primarily because EPRCM avoids the errors associated

    with idealisation of the material behaviour and captures and

    accurately represents (as will be shown in the examples) the

    constitutive behaviour of the material directly from data.

    5. Numerical examples

    To illustrate the developed computational methodology,

    three numerical examples of application of the developed

    EPR-based finite element method to engineering problems are

    presented. In the first example, the application of the methodol-

    ogy to a simple case of linear elastic material behaviour is

    examined. In the second example, the method is applied to a

    boundary value problem involving the analysis of stresses and

    strains around a tunnel considering nonlinear and elasto-plastic

    Start

    Input Data (Geometry,

     Applied Load, Initial and

    Boundary Condition)

    Increase the Applied Load

    Incrementally

    Convergence

    I    t    er   a t   i     onL   o o  p

    Output Result

    L   o a d  I   n c r   em en t   

    L   o o  p

    STOP

    Start

    Input Data (Experimental

    Data, Physical Insight)

    Genetic

     Algorithm

    Mathematical

    Structure

    Least Square

    Symbolic

    Function

    Fitness

    Check based on fitness criteria

    and or generation number 

    YESNO

    NO

    YES

    Whole load

    applied?

    YES

    NO

    EPR

    Constitutive

    equation

    EPR FEA

    Current state of

    stresses and strains

    1- Next state of

    Stresses

    2- Jacobian Matrix

    EPRCM(s)

    Solve the Main

    Equation

    UMAT

    Fig. 1.  The incorporation of EPR-based material model in ABAQUS finite element software.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53 –6556

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    6/14

    material behaviour. In the third example, the application of 

    the method to the analysis of the behaviour of soil under cyclic

    loading is presented.

    5.1. Example 1

    This example involves a thick circular cylinder conforming to

    plane strain conditions.   Fig. 2  shows the geometric dimensions

    and the element discretization employed in the solution where 12

    eight-node isoparametric elements have been used. The cylinder

    is made of linear elastic material with a Young’s modulus of 

    E ¼2.1105 N/mm2 and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 [42]. This example

    was deliberately kept simple in order to verify the computationalmethodology by comparing the results with those of a linear

    elastic finite element model. The compressibility of the material

    is assumed to be negligible and hence the EPR model for

    volumetric strain is not considered in this example. The loading

    case considered involves an internal pressure of 8.0104 kPa as

    shown in Fig. 2.

    Fig. 3a shows a linear elastic stress–strain relationship with a

    gradient of 2.1105 MPa. The slope of this line represents the

    elastic modulus, E , for the material. The data from this figure were

    used to train the EPR model in order to capture the linear stress–

    strain relationship for the material.

    After training, the selected EPR model to represent the stress–

    strain:

    qiþ1 ¼1:5 108

    Deq3:4662 106

     ffiffiffiffiqi

    q   þ2:4231 1011Deq

    þ2:4231 1011eq0:00504eq

     ffiffiffiffiqi

    q   þ0:01197   ð7Þ

    Fig. 3(b) shows the stress–strain relationship predicted by the

    EPR model, together with the original one. It is seen that after

    training, the EPR model has successfully captured the stress–

    strain relationship with a precise accuracy.

    100 mm

    200 mm

    P

    Fig. 2.  FE Mesh in symmetric quadrant of a thick cylinder.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0

    Strain

       S   t  r  e  s  s   (   M   P  a   )

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 0.001

    Strain

       S   t  r  e  s  s   (   M   P  a   )

    0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001

    0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008

    Fig. 3.  (a) Linear stress–strain relationship used for training and (b) the results of 

    EPR predictions for stress–strain values.

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200

    0

    radius (mm)

       R  a   d   i  a   l   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   M   P

      a   )

    Standard FEM

    IFEM (EPRCM)

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    radius (mm)

       R  a   d   i  a   l   D   i  s  p   l  a  c  e  m  e  n   t   (  m  m   )

    Standard FEM

    IFE (EPRCM)

    40 80 120 160 200

    0 40 80 120 160 200

    Fig. 4.   Comparison of the results of the EPR-FEM and standard FEM solution in

    terms of (a) radial stress and (b) radial displacement.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53–65   57

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    7/14

    The EPR-based finite element model incorporating the trained

    EPR model was used to analyse the behaviour of the cylinder

    under applied internal pressure. The results are compared with

    those obtained using a standard linear elastic finite element

    method. Fig. 4 shows the radial displacements and radial stresses

    along a radius of the cylinder, predicted by the two methods.

    Comparison of the results shows that the results obtained using

    the EPR-based FEM are in excellent agreement with those

    attained from the standard finite element analysis. This showsthe potential of the developed EPR-based finite element method

    in deriving constitutive relationships from raw data using EPR 

    and using these relationships to solve boundary value problems.

    5.2. Example 2

    This example involves the analysis of deformations around a

    tunnel subjected to excavation and gravity loadings. The geometry of 

    the tunnel and the finite element mesh are shown in Fig. 5. The finite

    element mesh includes 142 eight-node isoparametric elements and

    451 nodes. The depth of the tunnel crown from the ground surface is

    12 m. The analysis is done in two steps. The first step includes a

    geostatic analysis where all the elements are subjected to gravity

    loading. In the second step 46 elements representing the tunnelelements, are removed to simulate the excavation process.

    The results from a series of drained triaxial tests from

    literature  [43], containing information on both shear and volu-

    metric behaviour, were used for the training of the EPR based

    constitutive model with an incremental stress–strain (tangential

    stiffness) strategy. It was assumed that the soil tested was

    representative of the soil material around the tunnel. The test

    data were arranged as shown in   Table 1   and used to train an

    EPRCM to model the stress–strain relationship for the soil.

    The results from five tests conducted at confining pressures

    of 50, 100, 300, 400, 600 kPa were used for training of the

    EPR models while those for the sixth and seventh tests at the

    confining pressure of 200, 500 kPa were used for validation of the trained EPR models. At the end of the training and testing

    procedure, the selected best EPR models representing the beha-

    viour of the soil are:

    qiþ1 ¼7:3384 107 p03ev

    qi 

    5:077eivqiDeq

    þ0:416 p0eq

    qi

    0:47537eqþ0:90403qi0:09154qiDeq

    þ0:00011719ðqiÞ2þ0:06081 p0þ0:12364 p0Deq

    0:0025518 p0eqDeq0:00006795 p02þ4:4456   ð8aÞ

    eiþ1v   ¼ 1:0005eivþ0:0010163q

    iDeqþ0:000016185q

    ieqDeq

    0:001178 p0

    Deqþ0:0017108   ð8bÞFig. 5.  Geometry of the tunnel and the FE mesh.

     Table 1

    Input and output parameters used for training the

    EPR constitutive model for the tunnel example.

    Input parameters Output parameter

     p0i , qi , eiv , eiq ,  De

    iq   q

    iþ1

     p0i , qi , eiv , eiq ,  De

    iq   e

    iþ1v

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   i  c   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P  a   )

    Deviatoric Strain %

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    0

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   i  c   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P  a   )

    Deviatoric Strain %

    5 10 15 20 25 30

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    Fig. 6.   (a) Results of training of the ANN and (b) stress–strain relationship

    predicted by the trained EPR.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53 –6558

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    8/14

    Figs. 6(a) and 7(a) shows the stress–strain curves predicted by

    Eqs. (8a) and (8b) against those expected and used as training

    data. It is clearly seen that, the EPR was able to capture the

    constitutive (nonlinear) stress–strain relationship for the soil with

    very good accuracy. The generalisation capability of the EPRCMs

    is shown in   Fig. 6(b) and   Fig. 7(b). The data from the test

    conducted at the confining pressures of 200 and 500 kPa (which

    did not form a part of the training data) were used to test the

    trained EPRCMs. The predicted output values of the EPR modelsare compared with the experimentally measured values in

    Fig. 6(b) and Fig. 7(b). It is seen that the generalisation capability

    of the trained EPRCM is excellent.

    In addition, the EPR models (Eqs. (8a) and (8b)) are used to

    predict the entire stress paths, incrementally, point by point, in

    the q   : eq  and  ev   : eq  spaces. This is used to evaluate the capabilityof the incremental EPR models to predict the behaviour of the soil

    during the entire stress paths.   Fig. 8   illustrates the procedure

    followed for updating of the input parameters and building the

    entire stress path for a shearing stage of a triaxial test. At the start

    of the shearing stage in a conventional triaxial experiment, the

    values of all parameters are known. For example in a test on a

    sample of a saturated soil, the values of effective mean stress,  p0i,

    deviator stress qi

    , deviatoric strain ei

    q  and volumetric strain,  ei

    vareknown from values of applied cell pressure, pore water pressure

    and volume change at the end of the previous stage (e.g., at the start

    of shearing stage   eiq ¼ 0,   eiv ¼ 0 and   q

    i ¼ 0). Then, for a given

    increment of deviatoric strain,  Deq, the values of  qiþ1 and eiþ1v   arecalculated from the EPR models (Eqs. (8a) and (8b), respectively). For

    the next increment, the values of  p 0i, e iq, eiv  q

    i and are updated as

    qi ¼ qiþ1 ð9Þ

    eiv ¼ eiþ1v   ð10Þ

     p0i ¼ p0iþ  qiþ1qi

    3

      ð11Þ

    eiq ¼ eiqþDeq   ð12Þ

    and the next points on the curves are predicted using the EPR 

    models. The incremental procedure is continued until all the points

    on the curves are predicted. Fig. 9(a) and (b) show the comparison

    between two complete curves predicted using the EPR models

    following the above incremental procedure and the experimental

    results. The predicted results are in good agreement with the

    experimental results and the facts that (i) the entire curves have

    been predicted point by point; (ii) the errors of prediction of the

    individual points are accumulated in this process, and still the EPR 

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

       V  o   l  u  m  e   t  r   i  c

       S   t  r  a   i  n   %

    Deviatoric Strain %

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    00

       V  o   l  u  m  e   t  r   i  c   S   t  r  a   i  n   %

    Deviatoric Strain %

    EPR Prediction (200 kPa)

    EPR Prediction (500 kPa)

     Actual Data (200 kPa)

     Actual Data (500 kPa)

    5 10 15 20 25 30

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    Fig. 7.  (a) Results of training of the EPR and (b) volumetric strain predicted by the

    trained EPR.

    Fig. 8.  procedure followed for updating of the input parameters and building the

    entire stress path for a shearing stage of a triaxial test.

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   i  c   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P  a   )

    Deviatoric Strain (%)

    -8

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    0

       V  o   l  u  m  e   t  r   i  c   S   t  r  a   i  n   (   %   )

    Deviatoric Strain (%)

    5 10 15 20 25 30

    5 10 15 20 25 30

    Fig. 9.   Comparison of EPR incremental simulation with the actual data

    (a) simulation of deviatoric stress and (b) simulation of volumetric strain.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53–65   59

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    9/14

    models are able to predict the complete stress paths with a good

    degree of accuracy are testaments to the robustness of the

    developed EPR framework for modelling of soils.

    These figures show that the EPR has been able to capture the

    general trend of the nonlinear relationship of stress and strain

    with a good accuracy. It also shows that the EPR model was

    trained sufficiently to adequately model the stress–strain beha-

    viour of the soil. The trained EPRCMs were incorporated in the

    EPR-based finite element (EPR-FEM) using UMAT in ABAQUS. TheFE incorporating the EPR models was then used to simulate the

    behaviour of the tunnel under gravity and excavation loadings.

    For the conventional finite element analyses, the results of the

    triaxial tests were used to derive the material parameters for the

    Modified Cam Clay (MCC) and Mohr–Coulomb (MC) models for

    the soil (see Table 2).

    Fig. 10 shows the comparison between the displacements in the

    tunnel predicted using standard finite element analyses using the

    MCC and MC models as well as the EPR-based finite element

    method where the raw data from the triaxial tests were directly

    used in deriving the EPR-based constitutive model. Deformations of 

    tunnel is magnified by a factor of 5. The patterns of deformation are

    similar in all three analyses. Despite the relatively small difference

    between the results from the different analyses, it can be argued

    that the EPR-based FE results are more reliable, as this method used

    the original raw experimental data to learn the constitutive

    relationships for the material and it did not assume a priori any

    particular constitutive relationships, yield conditions, etc.

    From the results obtained, it is shown that the developed

    intelligent finite element method is also capable of capturing

    more complex constitutive relationships of materials and can

    offer very realistic prediction of the behaviour of structures.

    5.3. Example 3: behaviour of soil under cyclic loading 

    In this example, the behaviour of a soil is studied in triaxial

    tests under cyclic axial loading. The test data for this example

    were generated by numerical simulation of triaxial experiments.

    In general, generating data by numerical simulation has advan-

    tages including: (i) it is more economic (ii) it is far less time

    demanding, (iii) it can simulate loading paths and test conditions

    that cannot be easily achieved in physical testing due to physical

    constraints of the testing equipment. The data for training and

    validation of the EPR were created by finite element simulation of 

    triaxial cyclic loading tests at constant cell pressures using the

    Modified Cam Clay model. The material parameters assumed for

    the soil are:

    l¼0.174 (slope of the virgin consolidation line),

    k¼0.026 (slope of the unloading/reloading lines in the  v:Lnp0

    space),

    M ¼1 (slope of the critical state line in the  q: p0 space),

    P 1¼100.0 kPa (isotropic preconsolidation pressure),

     Table 2

    Material parameters for Modified Cam Clay and Mohr–Coulomb models.

    C 0 (kPa)   f0 ðdeg:Þ   M    k   e0   n g  (kN/m3)   l

    11.7 21 0.8 0.00715 0.921 0.3 17 0.091

    Fig. 10.   Comparison of the results of the intelligent FEA and conventional FE

    analyses using Mohr–Coulomb and Duncan–Chang models.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0.00

    Strain

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P

      a   )

    100 kPa

    150 kPa

    200 kPa250 kPa

    300 kPa

    0.00

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    Axial Strain

       V  o   l  u  m  e   t  r   i  c   S   t  r  a   i  n

    0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

    0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

    Fig. 11.   Typical cyclic loading test data used for training and validation of EPR.

    (a) Shear stress and (b) volumetric strain.

     A.A. Javadi et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 58 (2012) 53 –6560

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/18/2019 Cyclic Loading Using Intelligent Finite Element Method

    10/14

    The generated data were used to train and test EPRCMs. The

    EPRCMs were then incorporated in the intelligent EPR-based

    finite element model to represent the soil behaviour under cyclic

    loading. The results of the EPR-based finite element analyses were

    compared with those attained using conventional finite element

    method. The performance of the model was evaluated for two

    separate cases of loading where the soil was subjected to:

    1- Multiple and regular cycles of loading and unloading; and2- Multiple and irregular cycles of loading and unloading.

    The data generated by numerical simulation of the cyclic

    loading tests at confining pressures of 100, 150, 200, 250 and

    300 kPa are shown in   Fig. 11(a) and   Fig. 11(b). In order to

    introduce a level of noise that inevitably exists in real triaxial

    test data, numerical simulation for each confining pressure was

    repeated by changing the total number of load increments in

    the simulation and the obtained data were combined and used

    in training of the EPR models.   Fig. 12   shows typical results of 

    the tests conducted at confining pressure of 150 kPa with four

    different load increments.

    The data from the tests at confining pressures of 100, 150, 200and 300 kPa were used for the training of the two EPR models.

    The first model was developed to predict the deviator stress  qiþ1

    and the second one to predict the volumetric strain   eiþ1v   . Thetrained EPR models were validated using the data from the test at

    the confining pressure of 250 kPa. The input and output para-

    meters used for training of the EPR models are presented in

    Table 3. In the table p0 is net mean stress, q  is deviator stress, ev  isvolumetric strain and   e1   is axial strain. The indices   i   and   iþ1represent the state of stress or strain at current (incremental)

    step, and the next step, respectively.

    The selected EPR models for  q  and  ev  are:

    qiþ1 ¼0:0084ðqiÞ3

     p02eiv

    2667:247ðqiÞ2ðDe1Þ2

     p0e1

    0:060714ðqiÞ3De1 p0eiv

    þ1:8866evDe1

    qi 

    1:9676qiDe1eiv

    þ888:4ðqiÞ2ðDe1Þ

    3

    eiv

    þ104:4964 p0De11:4 105 p02þ0:018826 p02qieivDe1

    þ1:0525qi0:71525   ð13aÞ

    eiþ1v   ¼ 0:02369qiDe1

     p0e1

    0:4217qiDe1 p0

      þ9:3 106e1

    qi

    þ0:45727De1þ0:99eivþ0:000041535   ð13bÞ

    Fig. 13(a) and (b) show the results predicted by Eqs. (13a)

    and (13b), respectively, for the training data set together with the

    actual training data. Fig. 13(a) shows the results of the devitoric

    stress model for different confining pressures. Typical results of 

    the volumetric strain model (Eq. (13b)) at confining pressure of 

    100 kPa are presented in Fig. 13(b) together with the actual data.

    It is seen from the figures that the EPR models were capable of 

    learning, with very good accuracy, the constitutive relationship of 

    the soil under cyclic loading paths. The trained EPRCMs were

    validated using a data set corresponding to the confining pressureof 250 kPa. The results of the validation tests are shown in

    Fig. 14(a) and (b). It is shown that the trained EPR models were

    able to generalise the training to loading cases that were not

    introduced to the EPR during training. Moreover the incremental

    prediction capability (described in Example 2) of the developed

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    0.000

    Strain

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   S   t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P  a   )

    4 increments

    8 increments20 increments40 increments

    0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014

    Fig. 12.   Typical cyclic loading test results with different load increments at

    confining pressure of 150 kPa.

     Table 3

    Input and output parameters used for training and

    testing of the EPR models for shear stress and

    volumetric strain cyclic models.

    Input parameters Output parameter

     p0i, qi , eiv, ei1 ,  De

    i1   q

    iþ1

     p0i, qi , eiv, ei1 ,  De

    i1   e

    iþ1v

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

       D  e  v   i  a   t  o  r   i  c   S

       t  r  e  s  s   (   k   P  a   )

    Axial Strain

     Actual Data (100 kPa) Actual Data (150 kPa)

     Actual Data (200 kPa) Actual Data (300 kPa)

    EPR prediction (100 kPa) EPR prediction (150 kPa)

    EPR prediction (200 kPa) EPR prediction (300 kPa)

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.00

       V  o   l  u  m  e   t  r   i  c   S   t  r  a   i  n

    Axial Strain

     Actual Dat