Cyberstalking Project Proposal
-
Upload
renee-powers -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Cyberstalking Project Proposal
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
1/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p1
Introduction
Since the beginning of Facebook, my friends and I have wasted time Facebook
stalking. Though this term is used in jest, cyberstalking is no laughing matter. Social
networking sites like Facebook highlight the commodification of relationships that rely
on mass participation. The value of these relationships is cheapened and can be exploited.
Mass participation contributes to the threat of privacy violations through interpersonal
surveillance. Malicious interpersonal surveillance via social networking sites is known as
cyberstalking. This project will take a critical look at the relationship between social
media technology and violence against women. In an era where participation in social
networking sites is nearly compulsory and social technology is mobile, privacy, security,
and safety are of utmost importance.
Literature
Interpersonal surveillance in the digital age is characterized as surreptitious
strategies individuals use over communication technologies to gain awareness of another
users offline and/or online behaviors (Tokunaga, 2011, p. 706). Social networking sites,
like Twitter, Foursquare, and Facebook in particular, facilitate a mild form of casual
stalking. In fact, some users believe Facebook was created with this intention (Trottier,
2012) and anticipate some degree of monitoring (Marwick, 2012; Trottier, 2012). Other
users sharing behaviors normalize social sharing activities and individuals are likely to
conform (Brandtzaeg et al., 2010). But, serious Facebook stalking mirrors real world
stalking in a number of ways. Termed online obsessive relational intrusion, serious
Facebook stalking can involve unwanted gifts or messages, anonymous monitoring, and
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
2/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p2
following a user to virtual spaces (e.g. Facebook groups) or real-life locations (Chaulk &
Jones, 2011). This issue is exacerbated by the ubiquity of social media use.
The power differential is important to note, as interpersonal surveillance involves
a nontransparent hierarchical display of power. The observers goal is closeness whereas
the goal of the observed is autonomy (Tokunaga, 2011). This power dynamic inherent to
surveillance is exacerbated anonymity online, which allow[s] individuals to lurk in an
environment that reduces the threat of being discovered (p. 705). As perpetrators of
domestic violence rely on taking advantage of an imbalance of power (Walker, 2009), we
can assume serious interpersonal surveillance is a form of cyberstalking.
Cyberstalking as a form of domestic or intimate partner violence cannot be
ignored in the digital age. Perpetrators easily have access to a number of cyberstalking
technology: smart phones, monitoring software, social networking sites, online databases,
et cetera. Because of the internets intrinsic lack of boundaries, cyberstalking is difficult
to detect, and cyberstalking as a crime is often overlooked (King-Ries, 2011). It is clear
more research needs to be done in this area to shed light on the issue.
To counteract cyberstalking, some institutions suggest women avoid using social
media and to reconsider their smartphone purchase, contributing to a larger culture of
violence. I propose that we critique such a suggestion to consider the smartphones
relationship to the power structure of society--that is, to how stalkers use such
technology. Women should not be forced to choose between mobile technology and the
potential to be stalked. Instead, institutions and scholars ought to focus on those in power
who wrongfully use this technology to stalk. Such consideration of the power structures
and how mass media can be exploited to control those without power is reminiscent of
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
3/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p3
the Frankfurt school of critical theory.
Method
The issue of cyberstalking requires a critical approach to understanding the
relationship among social media, surveillance, and violence. Inspired by Frankfurt
scholar Theodor Adorno (1945), I will argue that social media users are conditioned by
the structure of a social-media-saturated society that keeps its users from criticizing social
realities. In this case, that reality is the threat and ease of cyberstalking. Much like
Adornos discussion of popular music, social media use encourages pseudo-
individualism; the consumer thinks he or she has choices but ultimate must conform to
the ways that other users share personal information. In order to update Adornos
theories, I will incorporate the theory of neoliberalism. For example, when a social media
user lapses on their privacy settings on social networking sites, instead of critiquing the
cultural conditions that facilitate the sharing of private information, the digital culture
assumes the individual should take responsibility. In other words, a user only has him- or
herself to blame for any malicious activity that comes from the lapse. In a social-media-
saturated society, providing information to networking sites has become nearly
compulsory, and so the blame is wrongly attributed. This suggestion complies with the
dominant societal power structure in that it places blame on the victim of cyberstalking.
In this sense, smartphone use is a tool of the dominant power structure. My project will
explore the tensions and relationships among power, technology, and violence against
women in order to find a solution to ensure womens safety in a society that seeks to both
encourage us to participate in information-sharing and to disempower us.
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
4/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p4
Significance
Cyberstalking is a serious crime that is often overlooked. In a digital age, it is
unreasonable to suggest women avoid using social networking sites to prevent such a
crime. In fact, this recommendation is akin to suggesting women in short skirts were
asking to be raped. A United States Department of Justice study reported 14% of
individuals age 18 and older have been victims of stalking, 25% of those victims reported
some form of cyberstalking, and 75% of stalking victims knew the perpetrator (Catalano,
2012). If the average number of Facebook friends is 229 (Hampton et al., 2011), the
likelihood of interpersonal surveillance and cyberstalking is quite high. And with the
Violence Against Women Act still in need of reauthorization by the United States
Congress, women should be worried about the protections against cyberstalking provided
by the law. A critical theory approach to the problem explores the structural conditions
that allow these crimes to continue.
References
Notable scholars:
danah boyd
Mark Andrejevic
David Lyon
Journals:
Surveillance and Society
Critical Studies in Media Communication
Computers in Human Behavior
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
5/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p5
Works cited:
Adorno, T. (1945).
Brandtzaeg, P.B., Luders, M., & Skjetne, J.H. (2010). Too many Facebook friends?
Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites.
Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (26), 1006-1030.
Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking victims in the United States Revised. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Justice.
Chaulk, K., & Jones, T. (2011). Online obsessive relational intrusion: Further concerns
about Facebook.Journal of Family Violence (26), 245-254.
Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (June 16, 2011). Social networking
sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved October 21,
2012 from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-
networks.aspx.
King-Ries, A. (2011). Teens, technology, and cyberstalking: The domestic violence wave
of the future? Texas Journal of Women and the Law (20), 131-164.
Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring in everyday life. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Marwick, A. E. (2012). The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life.
Surveillance and Society (9), 378-393.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding
the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships.
Computers in Human Behavior (27), 705-713.
Trottier, D. (2012). Interpersonal surveillance on social media. Canadian Journal of
Communication (37), 319-332.
-
7/31/2019 Cyberstalking Project Proposal
6/6
Renee Powers/Problem #2/p6
Walker, L.E.A. (2009). The battered woman syndrome (3rd
ed). New York: Springer
Publishing Company.