Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

download Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

of 22

Transcript of Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    1/22

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    2/22

    Civil Services:

    Include

    Officers and Staff of the Government, QuasiGovernmental Organisations including

    PSUs,etc Lok Ayuktas

    Regulatory Authorities including Anti

    Corruption Agencies Public Private Partnerships

    Judiciary(?)

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    3/22

    Public Representatives :

    Consist of

    Elected Representatives

    Appointed Representatives

    Political Parties

    Fourth Estate

    NGOs

    Consumer and other Activist Groups

    Trade Unions

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    4/22

    Relationship

    Civil Service vis-a vis

    Political Executive

    Peoples Representatives

    Media

    NGOs

    Activist Unions

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    5/22

    Impediments in effective

    functioning of Civil Services

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    6/22

    Presence of serious systemic obstacles toimproving public delivery systems.

    These systemic obstacles include:

    Overstaffing.

    Frequent transfers of public servants.

    Weak anti-corruption enforcement mechanisms.

    Role Swapping

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    7/22

    The Enabling

    Environment

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    8/22

    The Role of Political Leadership

    Vision Counts: The political leadershipinfluenced the kinds of reforms pursued in

    several states, like AP, MP, and Karnataka.

    Bipartisan consensus across party linesfacilitated reforms to improve program

    delivery in Tamil Nadu.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    9/22

    An Empowered Civil Service

    Stability of tenure crucial to empowering civil

    servants spearheading reform initiatives.

    Managerial autonomy for decision-making.

    Political support and signaling.

    Civil Service when empowered by political

    leaders can be an effective instrument forinnovation in service delivery.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    10/22

    Activating Civic Pressures for

    Change The Importance of Institutional Design

    Access to information laws work best when appeals processes are simple andpressure from below encourage their use.

    Institutionalized citizen participation in urban governance.

    Public Interest Litigation

    NGOs appeal to one part of the state (the judiciary) to hold anotheraccountable (the executive).

    Creating Stakes for Participation:

    The Political Economy of Hospital Autonomy in MP

    Using the Media for Effect:

    Anti-corruption Institutions need to focus more on corruption in servicedelivery; the media can be an important ally when prosecution is difficult.

    Surat Municipal Corporation use the media as an ally.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    11/22

    Simplifying Transactions: Lessons

    High-level political support key to overcomingresistance.

    Stability of tenure for administrative

    champions necessary. Importance of Public-Private Partnerships

    Low levels of citizen awareness in rural areas

    an obstacle to change. No jobs lost in any of these initiatives: Win-

    Win Situation.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    12/22

    Restructuring Agency Processes: Cases

    State-Wide Agencies

    Andhra Pradeshs Transport and Registration Departments

    The Karnataka State and Road Transport Corporation.

    City-Wide Agencies

    Transforming City Agencies in Bangalore Reforms in the Surat Municipal Corporation

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    13/22

    Decentralization: Cases and

    LessonsCases: Surat After the Plague, 1994-2005.

    Decentralizing Teacher Management in MP.

    Lessons:

    Decentralization in Surat freed the municipal commissioner tofocus on policy issues and empowered zonal commissioners,on the ground, to deal with a fast-changing situation.

    Decentralizing teacher control to PRIs in MP lowered teacher

    absenteeism and reinforced accountability. Use of para-teachers made it possible to extend a decentralized

    model of teacher management in MP that boosted schoolenrollment in a fiscally-constrained setting.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    14/22

    Strengthening Provider Autonomy

    Case: Rogi Kalyan Samitis in MP.

    Hospitals set up as RKS societies with autonomy tocharge user fees and deploy them for purchase of

    equipment and maintenance. RKS societies representative of local society.

    Results:

    Productivity of salary expenditures improved

    Doctor enthusiasm increased with better equipment Patient satisfaction ratings increased significantly.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    15/22

    Building Political Support for Program Delivery

    Comparing HD Outcomes in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

    Both States possess similar human developmentoutcomes in 1981; By 2001, Tamil Nadu had jumped tothird place while Karnataka remained in seventh place,

    despite similar rates of economic growth. Gap is now narrowing, but the question remains why TN

    was a superior performer in the 1980s and 1990s on thewhole.

    Key difference is the role of the Tamil Nadu government

    in fashioning a set of public policies and interventions toboost human development beyond what might have beenexpected by growth alone.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    16/22

    Political Support Spurred Andhra

    Pradeshs Civil Service into Action

    Programs effectively implemented by APs civil service.

    Collector in AP a senior officer unlike many states; APalso have no divisional commissioner system to dilute thecollectors power; and Secretaries possess tradition of

    autonomy in implementation in the state.

    Karnataka lacked an entrenched welfarist ideology topush social programs: Mid-day meal scheme in the state,for example, not launched until 2002; northern Karnataka

    remains behind the rest of the state.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    17/22

    Strengthening Accountability

    Mechanisms: Cases

    Reducing Frequent Transfers .

    Report Cards in Bangalore, 1994-2004.

    Right to Information: Rajasthan and Delhi.

    Strengthening Anti-Corruption Institutions

    The Central Vigilance Commission

    The State Lok Ayukta

    Public Interest Litigation and the Courts.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    18/22

    Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms:

    Premature Transfers

    New approaches might involve the creation ofstatutory civil services boards to restricttransfers, legal minimum tenures, and a

    stability index to track transfers.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    19/22

    Aggregate Transfers, Karnataka,

    2000-05

    Total Group A, B, C and D Transfers - Governme nt of Karnataka

    (2000-2005)

    16798

    30275

    34017

    54333

    8211

    0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 (April-

    Sept)

    Year

    EmployeesinThousands

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    20/22

    Strengthening Accountability

    Mechanisms: Report Cards Report cards prod agency heads into action, and

    mobilize public pressure for change.

    Satisfaction with Public Services Across CRCs

    4 69

    5

    25

    1

    14

    46 45

    30

    25

    43

    16 18

    54

    71 73

    18

    37

    15

    65

    0

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    BWSSB BESCOM BSNL BMP Govt

    Hospital

    BDA RTO

    Agency

    Pe

    rcentge

    1994 1999 2003

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    21/22

    Karnatakas Lok Ayukta:

    Focus on Service Delivery

    Investigates corruption/maladministration;budget U.S.$1.6 million; five hundred officers;activist judge appointed in 2001

    Investigations: Drug adulteration

    Public hospitals (absenteeism, exploitation)

    Transport and registration departments.

    Corruption in municipal government Volume of complaints triple in one year.

    Wide publicity may be the best way to check

    corruption when courts dont work.

  • 7/27/2019 Cvl Servs vs Public Reps

    22/22

    THANK YOU