Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

download Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

of 4

Transcript of Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

  • 7/29/2019 Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

    1/4

    Heritage in crisis: RESCUE responds to the fifth report on local government heritage

    staff resources

    In July 2013 a report on local government staff resources allocated to archaeology

    and building conservation was issued jointly by English Heritage, The Association of Local

    Government Archaeological Officers and the Institute of Historic Building Conservation1.

    The information summarised in the report shows clearly and unequivocally that there has

    been a significant decline in the availability of the specialist advice that local authorities

    require if they are to deal properly and responsibly with our archaeological and built

    heritage. The downward trend in the provision of services which began in 2006 has seen

    the numbers of archaeological advisors, including Historic Environment Records (HER)

    officers, fall by 28% while the decline in the numbers of conservation officers has been even

    more marked at 33%. In the past twelve months alone the number of archaeological

    specialists has fallen by 3% and the numbers of conservation officers by 4%. There is no

    sign of this rate of decline ceasing and with further cuts to local authority budgets planned

    for the financial year 2013-2014 it seems that the situation will continue to worsen.

    A crisis in the planning system

    RESCUE The British Archaeological Trust2 welcomes the publication of this report

    and the presentation of a clear summary of the ongoing decline in the capacity of localcouncils to deal adequately with archaeological and historic sites within our towns, cities

    and countryside. The findings confirm the anecdotal information collected by RESCUE

    over the same period which indicates that heritage services are amongst the first to be

    reduced or eliminated by local authorities when cuts are required to meet central

    government spending targets. Specific examples include the closure of the Merseyside

    HER and the withdrawal of advice to five local authorities (Knowsley, Liverpool, Sefton, St

    Helens & Wirral) in a region that includes the Liverpool waterfront World Heritage Site.

    Other areas affected by severe cuts include the West Midlands where Sandwell and Dudley

    no longer have HERs, Walsall has no archaeological officer and where the archaeology and

    historic buildings of Birmingham, our second city, are the responsibility of one individual.

  • 7/29/2019 Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

    2/4

    Such actions are directly contrary to the governments National Planning Policy Framework

    (NPPF)3 which states that:

    Local planning authorities should have up-to-date evidence about the historic environment

    in their area and use it to assess the significance of heritage assets and the contribution to

    their environment. ... Local planning authorities should either maintain or have access toa historic environment record(NPPF paragraph 169, emphasis added).

    Government and the value of culture

    In a speech delivered at the British Museum on 24th April 2013, the Secretary of State

    for Culture, Media and Sport, Maria Miller, drew attention to the immense financial value

    of the cultural sector, including the heritage sector and made specific reference to the case

    of Liverpool4. In a response to the speech, RESCUE questioned the logic of emphasising the

    value of culture while at the same time allowing spending in real terms to fall to the extent

    that the historic environment is no longer effectively protected5. RESCUE believes that the

    points made in its response to the Ministers speech are confirmed by the findings of the

    report on local authority staff resources. On the basis of this evidence, RESCUE asserts that

    the governments imposition of unrealistic spending limits on local authorities is a

    transparent tactic designed to deflect criticism of government policy onto local authorities

    and thus to shift the blame away from central government to local government under the

    guise of permitting local decision making. RESCUE asserts that responsibility for the

    nations heritage should be borne equally by local and national government and that the

    central government should take active steps to fulfil its responsibilities under the NPPF and

    international agreements (notably the Valetta Convention6) by requiring local authorities to

    meet those responsibilities and by giving them the resources to do so.

    Facing up to the crisis

    RESCUE has been working to protect the nations heritage since 1972 and in that

    time has noted that the provision of heritage services has fluctuated under governments of

    all political parties. For this reason we are now calling for a cross-party approach to the

    issues which face us today and which are summarised in the report reviewed here. In

    particular RESCUE expects to see the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Archaeology(APPAG) taking a much more robust role in monitoring and actively supporting the system

    of heritage protection which is fundamental to the long term survival of our historic sites

    and landscapes. We expect the members of the APPAG to take on a commitment to work

    with both professional and voluntary heritage groups to ensure that the nations heritage

    receives the attention and care that it deserves and to argue the case in parliament.

    As a first step, RESCUE calls on the government and the opposition parties to

    undertake a joint commitment to the following reforms to the system of heritage protection:

  • 7/29/2019 Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

    3/4

    To make the provision of conservation and archaeological advisory services chargedwith the safeguarding of the historic and built environment a statutory obligation on

    all local authorities

    To make the provision of a fully resourced Historic Environment Record a statutoryobligation on all local authorities

    To make access to a Historic Environment Record free for all citizens, communitygroups, research students, academics and others with a legitimate interest in the

    historic environment

    Furthermore, RESCUE sees it as essential that local and regional museums are

    adequately resourced in order to be able to undertake the care and conservation of the

    written records, artefacts and other material that are the result of all archaeological

    fieldwork without the imposition of prohibitive charges on those responsible for depositing

    such material on the completion of fieldwork.

    A future for our past?

    RESCUE believes that the country is close to reaching a point at which the provision

    of services designed to safeguard our historic environment is no longer adequate to meet

    the challenges that present themselves on a day-to-day basis. The report reviewed here is

    the fifth on such issues and the information that it contains is paralleled by the experience

    of RESCUE and other heritage organisations.In spite of the publication of reports by heritage organisations and expressions of

    concern when a specific archaeological site or historic building is lost, the catalogue of loses

    and failures continues to mount. We must ask ourselves at what stage will we decide to act

    collectively to support under-resourced and vulnerable services and thus ensure that our

    historic sites and landscapes receive the protection that they require through the planning

    process? There is an obvious challenge here for the bodies that have compiled this report

    and for those who purport to represent the heritage profession. We must act collectively to

    address the situation. More broadly there is a need for everyone concerned with our

    nations heritage, including the wider public, to commit to join the campaign in support ofthreatened services. Will we rise to meet this challenge as we did in the early 1970s or will

    future generations look back on the early 21st century as the time when we abandoned our

    past to short-termism and financial expediency?

    RESCUE The British Archaeological Trust

    19th September 2012

    Notes1A summary of the content and a link to the full report can be found here:

    http://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=6410

    http://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=6410http://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=6410http://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=6410
  • 7/29/2019 Cuts to Local Authority Heritage Staff RESCUE Response

    4/4

    2RESCUE is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting archaeology in Britain

    and abroad. Details of RESCUEs work can be found on the website:www.rescue-

    archaeology.org.uk

    3National Planning Policy Framework:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077

    /2116950.pdf

    4Testing Times: Fighting cultures corner in an age of austerity

    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-

    age-of-austerity

    5Testing Times: Fighting cultures corner in an age of austerity A response by RESCUE

    The British Archaeological Trusthttp://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-

    times/

    6Details of the terms of the Valetta Convention can be found here:

    http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/143.htm. RESCUE contends that

    Britain is in breach of Articles 2 (i), 4 (iii) and 5 (i, ii and iii) of the Convention as a direct

    result of government policy.

    http://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/http://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/http://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/http://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdfhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdfhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdfhttps://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-age-of-austerityhttps://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-age-of-austerityhttps://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-age-of-austerityhttp://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/http://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/http://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/http://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/143.htmhttp://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/143.htmhttp://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/143.htmhttp://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/http://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/2013/04/26/testing-times/https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-age-of-austerityhttps://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/testing-times-fighting-cultures-corner-in-an-age-of-austerityhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdfhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdfhttp://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/http://www.rescue-archaeology.org.uk/