Culture and Management. 2 from 26 Table of Contents.
-
Upload
erik-gregory -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Culture and Management. 2 from 26 Table of Contents.
Culture and ManagementOrganizational Behavior – Session 4
Dr. S. B. Alavi, 2009.
2 from 26
Table of Contents• Culture
– What is culture?– Why studying OB across culture?– Level of Analysis Issues– Why using cultural dimensions?– Values across culture (Hofstede’s Studies)– Emic and Etic Approches– GLOBE Studies
3 from 26
What is culture?
• Issocial pattern including shared beliefs, norms, and values
• According to Hofstede, culture is a multi-layer phenomenon, and people’s assumptions and values are at the centre of the phenomenon.
4 from 26
Why studying OB across cultures?
• Working with people in other cultures, through Globalization;
• Development of modified behavioral models for local management.
5 from 26
Level of analysis issue
• Cultural level: – comparing cultures
• Individual level: – Comparing individuals
6 from 26
Why using cultural dimensions?
• Cultures can be compared using universal dimensions.
• Using cultural dimensions, we can investigate and understand the impacts of different aspects of a culture on OB.
7 from 26
Values across cultures: Hofstede’s studies• Individualism/collectivism;
• Power distance;
• Femininity/Masculinity– Quality of life/Quantity of life
• Uncertainty avoidance;
• Long-term/short-term orientation
8 from 26
1. Individualism/Collectivism
• Individualism is the degree to which individuals are supposed to look after themselves or remain integrated into in-groups.
• Individualistic cultures highly valueHedonism, independence, and freedom
In contrast
• Collectivistic cultures highly valueinterdependence, self-sacrificing, and loyalty
9 from 26
1. Individualism/Collectivism (con.)
• Some Consequences:
Verbal Communication
Non-verbal communication
Privacy issues
Conflict management styles
Teamwork
10 from 26
2. Power Distance
• The extent to which power is unequally distributed and people accept this situation
High PD
• Ideal boss is a well-meaning autocrat or a god father
• Subordinates expect to be told
11 from 26
12 from 26
13 from 26
3. Femininity/Masculinity
• Masculinity refers to – the extent to which values such as
assertiveness, toughness, and competition prevail.
• However, femininity refers to – the degree to which employees value relations
and show sensitivity and emotions for the welfare of others.
14 from 26
4. Uncertainty avoidance
• The extent to which people feel either uncomfortable or comfortable in unstructured situation.
• Unstructured situations are novel, unknown, surprising, different from usual.
15 from 26
4. Uncertainty avoidance (con.)
• Some consequence of High UA:
high work stress
Tendency to stay with same employer
more resistance to change
Preferences for larger organizations
16 from 26
5. Long term orientation
• The extent to which people accept delayed gratification of their material, societal, and emotional needs
• A long-term orientation culture encourage people to
Value thrift, investment, and persistence.
And DisvalueLeisure time
17 from 26
Etic and Emic approaches
• Etic approach: – Studying behavior from a
position outside the system; examining many cultures and comparing them,
– criteria are considered universal.
• Emic approach: – Studying behavior from
within the system; examining only one culture,
– criteria are relative to internal characteristics.
18 from 26
GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness project)
• This project wasconducted in 61 countries
• The aim of this project was to investigate the existence of universally acceptable and universally unacceptable leadership attributes and to identify those attributes that are culture specific
19 from 26
Cultural dimensions in GLOBE
• Uncertainty avoidance• Gender egalitarianism• Societal collectivism• In-group collectivism• Human orientation• Power distance• Performance orientation• Future orientation• Assertiveness
20 from 26
Iranian sample in GLOBE
• Sample– 300 Iranian middle managers from three
industries of
banking,
telecommunications, and
food processing
21 from 26
Iranian sample in GLOBE
• Important results– Fairly high levels of power distance (5.43)
Maximum score in GLOBE list: 5.80
Ranking: 14 out of 61
– Quite low levels of societal collectivism (3.88)
Minimum score in GLOBE list: 3.25
Ranking: 13 lowest country
22 from 26
Iranian sample in GLOBE
• Conclusion for ‘what is’ – Iranian managers reported
one of the highest in-group collectivism
high power distance
one of the lowest societal collectivism
23 from 26
Iranian sample in GLOBE• The ‘should be’ part
– strong desire to decrease power distance in their culture.
The differences between ‘what was’ and ‘what should be’ for power distance was the highest difference of all the dimensions (5.43 ‘what was’ versus 2.80 ‘what should be’)
– Iranian managers were also likely to improve societal collectivism
Given the difference between ‘what was’ and ‘what should be’ for societal collectivism (3.88 ‘what was’ versus 5.44 ‘what should be’).
24 from 26
General Conclusions
• Cultural issues of Iranian society must be included in our leadership models in Iranian organizational contexts.
• Iranian managers who work in cross-cultural business contexts must develop their cultural competencies.