Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

52
Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence Lisa & Andrea

description

Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence. Lisa & Andrea. What Do You Think?. Please take a moment to ponder your personal conception of intelligence…. What behaviours constitute intelligence?. To what extent is it fixed?. By biology?. By one’s environment?. T hroughout one’s life?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Page 1: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectivesof Intelligence

Lisa & Andrea

Page 2: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

What Do You Think?Please take a moment to ponder

your personal conception of intelligence…

What behaviours constitute intelligence?

To what extent is it fixed?

By biology?By one’s environment?

Throughout one’s life?

Page 3: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

In the eye of the beholder…

"Conceptions of intelligence … vary widely across societies and are

influenced by the unique socio-cultural histories of those societies."

~ Elias Mpofu

Page 4: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Overview video: human brain [10 min] ‘general intelligence’ vs. multiple intelligences

- Break -

other cultural perspectives video: growth mindset [3 min]

Page 5: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Why Our Presentation Will Be More Interesting than Doing the

Metro/ 24 Crossword…

As teachers, we’ll have our own conceptions of intelligence that we’ll subconsciously convey to our students.

It behooves us to examine them, now and regularly in our classes.

We may then also recognize behaviour exhibited by our students based on their conceptions of intelligence and what it means for their learning.

Page 6: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

What is Common…Conventional

notions of intelligence built around a loosely consensual definition in terms of generalized adaptation to the environment.

Page 7: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Carl Sagan on the Human Brain

Page 8: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

The psychometric approach

1860’s

First theory of

‘general intelligence’:

Intelligence is a…

biologically-based

mental faculty

that can be studied by

measuring a person’s

reaction time

to cognitive tasks.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Sir Francis GaltonQuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 9: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Doh!

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 10: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

IQ: Objectively Determined & Measured Statistician,

psychologist g-factor

Charles SpearmanQuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 11: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Fluid & Crystal

Gf: fluid abilities to solve abstract reasoning problems

Gc: crystallized abilities to solve problems of vocab, general info.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.Raymond Cattell

Page 12: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

The First IQ Test

1905 Basis of IQ Test Used

Today Initially created to

identify students who needed special help in school

Binet: case studies more detailed/ helpful; IQ tests save time

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Alfred Binet(né Alfredo Binetti)

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 13: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Binet’s Caveat!Test scores should not be

interpreted literally, as

intelligence is plastic.

Also, there is a margin of

error inherent to the test.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 14: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Sample Questions(1911 Version):An Aboriginal American who had come to

town for the 1st time in his life saw a white man riding across the street. As the white man rode by, the Aboriginal said - “the white man is lazy; he walks sitting down.

What was the white man riding on that caused the Aboriginal to say, “he walks sitting down”?

Page 15: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Test Sample

My neighbor has been having strange visitors. First a doctor came into the house, then a lawyer, then a minister. What do you think happened there?

Page 16: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Sample Questions

Age 4:

Fills in missing word when asked, “brother is a boy; sister is a ___”

Answers correctly when asked, “Why do we have houses?”

Page 17: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Sample QuestionsAge 9:

Answers correctly when examiner says, “In an old graveyard in Spain they have discovered a skull which they believe to be that of Christopher Columbus when he was about 10 yrs old. What is foolish about that?”

Examiner presents folded paper; child draws how it will look unfolded.

Page 18: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Sample QuestionsAge 12:

Completes “The streams are dry … there has been little rain.”

Tells what is foolish about statements such as “Bill Jones’s feet are so big that he has to put his trousers on over his head.”

Page 19: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Stanford-Binet Sample Questions

Adult:

Can describe the difference between misery and poverty; character and reputation; laziness and idleness.

Explains how to measure 3 pints of water with a 5-pint and a 2-pint can.

Page 20: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Multiple Forms of Intelligence Gardner 1983 psychometric

tests address only linguistic, logical, some spatial.

Yet to be conclusively demonstrated

Talents?

Page 21: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Successful Intelligence: Robert Sternberg

"I define [intelligence] as your skill in achieving whatever it is you want to attain in your life

within your sociocultural context... by capitalizing on your strengths & compensating for, or correcting, your weaknesses... through a

balance of analytical, creative, & practical abilities to adapt to, shape, & select

environments.”

~ Robert Sternberg

Page 22: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Know Thyself… Implicitly

Metacognition

- ability to understand & control oneself

Implicit (tacit) vs. explicit intelligence

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 23: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory

Metacomponents: plan what to do, monitor things as they are being done, & evaluate things after they are done.

Eg. recognizing existence of a problem, defining nature of a problem, deciding on a strategy for solving the problem, monitoring the solution of the problem, and evaluating solution after problem is solved.

Page 24: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory

Performance Components: execute instructions of metacomponents.

Eg. Inference used to decide who two stimuli are related, and application used to to apply what one has inferred.

Eg. comparison of two stimuli, justification of a given response as adequate although not ideal, actually making a response

Page 25: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg’s Triarchic TheoryKnowledge-acquisition Components: used to learn how to solve problems or simply acquire factual knowledge 1. Selective encoding: involves sifting out relevant

from irrelevant information (for one's own purpose) 2. Selective combination: involves combining

selectively encoded information in a way as to form an integrated, plausible whole.

3. Selective comparison: involves relating newly acquired info to info acquired in past. Encoding/ combination of new knowledge guided by retrieval of old info. New info will be useless if cannot somehow be related to old knowledge to form externally connected whole

Page 26: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory

3 Fundamental Aspects of Intelligence:

1. Analytic (academic)

2. Creative

3. Practical (eg. white & black rock anecdote)

Only analytic measured by mainstream tests.

Page 27: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg: Perspectives on intelligence are contextual

Skills needed for reading, for example, (pattern perception, articulatory ability, and comparison ability that can be developed but that exist in some amount in individuals whether or not they receive formal schooling), will be much less important in a preliterate society than in a literate one. In contrast, coordination skills that may be essential to life in a preliterate society (i.e. those motor skills required for shooting a bow and arrow) may be all but irrelevant to intelligent behaviour for most people in a literate and more "developed" society.

Page 28: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg: Intelligence is Purposive

It is directed toward goals, however vague or subconscious those goals may be. These goals need not be the attainment of the maxima of the goods most valued by society, for example, money, fame, or power. Rather, one may be willing to strive for less of one commodity in the hope of attaining more of another.

Page 29: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Sternberg: Intelligence involves shaping the environment Environmental shaping is used when one's

attempts to adapt to the given environment fail. One then attempts to reshape it to increase one's fit with it.

a highly individual process people who master their environment have the

ability to capitalize on strengths and to compensate for weaknesses. (Cronbach & Snow, 1977).

the individuals who do this are often described as having street smarts

Page 30: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Wechsler

"The global capacity of a person to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his/her environment.”

~David Wechsler (1939)

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

David Wechsler

Page 31: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

When I say go, draw a line through each red square and yellow triangle...

Page 32: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Which 3 of these pieces go together to make this puzzle?

Page 33: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Which one of these goes here to balance these scales?

Page 34: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

If intelligence is contextual..."It does not make sense to impose one culture's test on another

culture...The within-culture validity of the test needs to be demonstrated independently for the two cultures. Such sameness is probably a rare event.”

"This argument applies as well to multiple subcultures within a single culture.” Even if a test could be found where all individuals were tested on just those skills common to the adaptive requirements of all their cultures, we would still have to take into account the weighting afforded to those skills.

Page 35: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Why the differences?

Perspectives on intelligence have been linked to:

1. Cultural beliefs about human abilities

2. Availability & Accessibility of formal education to the general public

3. Social & economic goals

4. Level of industrialization/development and values underpinning achieved/aspired status

5. Availability of human and material resources available for study of intelligence.

Page 36: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Japan

Emphasis is on hard work Much personal responsibilty taken Not much room for mobility within

culture

Page 37: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Scandinavia

Foundation in psychometric testing Great deal of research Malmo study 1540 children born in 1928 Much support for positive effect of

education on IQ; also found occupation could be cause (as well as effect) of IQ

Page 38: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: France & french-speaking SwitzerlandBeginning of 20th c. conflict between:1. Binet: global, oriented to higher processes2. Toulouse & Piéron: analytical, oriented to

elementary processesAndré Rey: capacity to learn v. knowledge basePiaget: flexible, critical method of interviewing child;

interested in epistemology, rather than indiv differences; 1st dvlpmtl theory of intell.

Sociocognitive influences: child’s cognitive abilities not depend soley on child or teacher, but a social co-construction

Page 39: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development

1. Operative Intelligence: Understanding world and its dynamics via Assimilation & Accomodation. Parsing = recognizing + distinguishing

2. Figurative intelligence: Understanding of static world; perception, imitation, mental imagery, drawing, language.

These intelligences go through 4 stages:Sensorimotor, Preoperational, Concrete operational, & Formal operational.

Page 40: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Spain History of philosophical inquiry 16th c. Early 20th c., intelligence studied for practical

applications in education, business 1984, new law deleted study of individual differences

in intelligence from university curricula; cognitive psychology new paradigm

Much more recent research, incl study finding that nerve conduction velocity related to fluid intelligence but not to crystallized intelligence

Genes are not on the research agenda, however learning potential, philosophy for children, Sternberg, & emotional intelligence

Page 41: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: German-speaking countries Intellectual development considered a

dynamic lifelong process Continuous interplay between

individual’s biological and sociocultural inheritances.

Focus more on processes & function of intelligent behaviour rather than measuring /predicting intelligence

Page 42: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Israel

Heterogeneous population Severely deficient in natural resources,

therefore, development of human intellectural resources vital to economic survival.

Great efforts to improve school-based intelligence; and standards/ function of education

Test Anxiety recognized

Page 43: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Russia

Vygotsky (1978) argued that all intellectual abilities are social in origin.

Language & thought 1st appear with parents, develop with teachers.

The level of performance a child might reach with appropriate help, “zone of proximal development” ignored by standard tests.

Dynamic - cooperative perspective on intelligence

Page 44: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: India

Laypeople’s conception:

1. Cognitive competence

2. Social competence

3. Competence in action

4. Emotional competence

Buddha, discipline, concentration, …

Page 45: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: India

“If a man keeps dwelling on sense-objects, attachment to them arises;from attachment, desire flares up;from desire, anger is born;

from anger, confusion follows;from confusion, weakness of memory; weak memory - weak understandingweak understanding - ruin.”

Page 46: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Latin America Study by Kaplan (1997): teachers in Buenos Aires

differ greatly in conceptions: innatist, environmental, & (a little) interactionist

General ability & compound of special abilities. Young children: intelligence viewed in relation to

discipline & good work habits; interest in learning; cognitive speed, reasoning, ability; creative; and certain social/family charcteristics (well-nourished, coming from well-constituted homes).

“His head is not fitted for studying” concept very popular in Latin America

Page 47: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural PerspectivesIn a study conducted in California, Okagaki and

Sternberg (1993) asked immigrant parents from Cambodia, Mexico, the Philippines & Vietnam, as well as native-born Angle-Americans and Mexican-Americans, about their conceptions of child-rearing, appropriate teaching, & children's intelligence. Parents from all groups except Angle-Americans indicated such characteristics as motivation, social skills, & practical school skills were as or more important than cognitive characteristics for their conceptions of an intelligent 1st-gr child.

Page 48: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural Perspectives: Canada Craik & Lockhart (1972) importance of depth

of processing for full command of material vs. speed of processing

Processing shallow (appearance, sound) or deep (semantic) --> affects memory recall

To enhance deep understanding, re-work, link, & use imagery

Contrast American stress processing speedQuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 49: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Cultural PerspectivesHeath (1983) found different ethnic groups in N.

Carolina have different conceptions of intelligence. To be considered intelligent or adaptive, one must excel in skills valued by one's own group. One particularly interesting contrast was importance ascribed to verbal vs. nonverbal communication skills--to saying things explicitly as opposed to using & understanding gestures & facial expressions. Note that while both forms of communicative skill have their uses, they are not equally well represented in psychometric tests.

Page 50: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Fixed trait vs. what we do with it

Carol Dweck

Page 51: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

Nature vs. NurtureGenetics Research

holds promise for insight into further understanding the neurological strucutres and flexibility that defines us and how our environment may work to best serve our genetics

Page 52: Cultural Perspectives of Intelligence

In Summary

Most systematic research In psychometric testing -has its limitations

Perspectives on intelligence are within a sociohistorical context.

Know much less about forms of intelligence tests don’t easily assess: wisdom, creativity, practical knowledge, social skills, ...