Cultural Heritage Position Paper · Cultural Heritage 3 Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02 I...
Transcript of Cultural Heritage Position Paper · Cultural Heritage 3 Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02 I...
Cultural HeritagePosition Paper
May 2002
‘balancing growth and lifestyle in the Redlands’
Redlands Planning Scheme
Table of contents
16/05/02
I Executive Summary 3
1 Introduction 7
1.1 Background 7
1.2 Purpose of this Paper 7
1.3 Relevant Issues 8
2 Current Planning Scheme: Approach Analysis (Strengths and Weaknesses) 8
2.1 Introduction 8
2.2 Strengths 10
2.3 Weaknesses 10
3 Cultural Heritage 11
3.1 Legislative Context 11
3.2 Historical Overview 14
3.3 Non-indigenous Cultural Heritage 15
3.4 Indigenous Cultural Heritage 18
3.5 State Agency Interests 21
4 Summary of Planning Implications 27
5 Planning Strategy Areas 28
5.1 Introduction 28
5.2 Protecting identified sites 28
5.3 Development adjacent to known sites 29
5.4 Protecting unidentified sites 29
5.5 Aspects of development 30
5.6 Identification of control elements 30
References 31
Appendix 1 – Register of the National Estate 33
Appendix 2 – Inventory of Places – Local Heritage Site List 35
Cultural Heritage
3Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
I Executive Summary
IntroductionThe following position paper, is one of twelve (12) documents, which provide an overview of the key issues, projected to impact on the future land use and development in Redland Shire. The paper has been prepared as part of Stage 3 of the Redlands Planning Scheme project and is intended to inform the land use option identification and assessment process programmed to occur in Stage 4. This paper discusses:
• How Council currently deals with the issue of cultural heritage protection and management under the Planning Scheme;
• The legislative mechanisms (both Federal and State) that require the protection of cultural heritage places;
• The history of the Shire;
• Known elements of indigenous and European heritage which require protection and management;
• State agency interests and requirements;
• Planning implications relating to cultural heritage; and
• The mechanisms which are available for dealing with cultural heritage protection (strategy areas).
Relevant IssuesIssues relevant to Cultural Heritage within the Shire include:
• The lack of detailed and comprehensive planning controls relating to cultural heritage within the Shire;
• The statutory obligations to protect areas of cultural heritage significance;
• The need and requirement to protect areas of Federal, state and local significance from incompatible land uses and activities that may adversely affect the cultural heritage values of an area;
• The requirement to collect further information regarding cultural heritage for certain geographic areas of the Shire;
• The State interest requirements for cultural heritage in planning schemes; and
• The planning scheme mechanisms available for the conservation of cultural heritage values.
Planning Implications• Redland Shire has a rich and diverse cultural heritage, which requires protection and management through the
planning scheme.
Cultural Heritage
4Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
• The planning scheme is required to be drafted to ensure that if a declaration is made under any of the following Acts or Registers, then that site is protected and given due recognition:
- Register of the National Estate;- Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984;- Native Title Act 1993 (excluding private land);- Cultural Records (Landscape Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987;- Queensland Heritage Register; and- Temporary Local Planning Instrument – Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire.
• Further assessment of potential cultural heritage sites needs to be under taken for:
- Mainland & North Stradbroke Island relating to Indigenous Cultural Heritage; and- North Stradbroke Island Relating to Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage.
• Those areas of the Shire that have not been the subject of a cultural heritage survey must be protected through the provision of ‘triggers’ in the planning scheme.
• It is important to not only protect an identified site but also those areas adjacent to a site.
Planning Strategy Areas
Protecting Identified Sites
• The Planning Scheme should include an inventory of all those places that are known to have cultural heritage significance. These include:
- Sites declared under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984;
- Sites included on the Queensland Heritage Register;
- Any place listed on the Register of the National Estate;
- Places identified as part of the Redlands Heritage Study and the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study; and
- Places of Indigenous significance identified in the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study. Further places will be identified in the proposed Redland Shire Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study.
Development Adjacent to Known Sites
It is important that development adjacent to known cultural heritage sites does not adversely impact upon the values of a known heritage site. The Planning Scheme should include triggers, which ensure a higher level of assessment and assessment against appropriate standards and controls (codes).
Cultural Heritage
5Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Protecting Unidentified Sites
• It is important that those sites that have not been identified as having cultural heritage values or significance are protected from inappropriate development, specifically:
- The mainland and North Stradbroke Island relating to Indigenous Cultural Heritage; and
- North Stradbroke Island relating to Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage.
• It is acknowledged that further studies need to be undertaken and it is important that values and sites are not lost. This can be achieved by:
- Non-Indigenous Heritage - Developing demolition controls for buildings over a certain age.
- Indigenous Heritage – Develop a system of triggers and codes that alerts the assessment manager during the assessment process.
Aspects of Development
• A planning scheme has the ability to make all aspects of development assessable development. These types of development include:
- Material change of use;- Building works;- Operational works;- Plumbing and drainage works; and- And reconfiguration of an allotment.
• Queensland Heritage Register – EPA recommends that all aspects of development are assessable;
• Register of National Estate – All aspects of development on those sites should be assessable;
• Designated Landscape Areas under the Cultural Records Act should be trigger assessed; and
• The Council’s current Schedule of European Places (Temporary Local Planning Instrument – Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire) assessable applications is considered appropriate.
Identification of Control Elements
The following requirements can be included within a heritage code or similar:
Indigenous Cultural Heritage
• Ensuring that developments are designed so as to avoid detrimental impacts on places of cultural heritage significance by:
- Existing sites, items or places are incorporated into open space areas of development.- The location of buffers between places of cultural heritage significance.- Restriction of access to places of cultural heritage significance.- Provision of signage identifying places of cultural heritage significance.- The density of development is reduced adjacent to known sites.
Cultural Heritage
6Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
• During construction and maintenance places of cultural heritage significance are protected.
- Include a requirement that a management plan be developed.- Management plan to be dev eloped and implemented in consultation with local indigenous groups.
Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage
• Principles addressed in the Temporary Local Planning Instrument Cultural Heritage Significance Code will be assessed and incorporated into the new planning scheme.
Cultural Heritage
7Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
The following position paper addressing cultural heritage, is one of twelve (12) position papers addressing key aspects of future land use and development policy in Redland Shire. The paper has been prepared as part of Stage 3 of the Redlands Planning Scheme project and is intended to inform the land use option identification and assessment process programmed to occur in Stage 4. The outcomes of Stage 4 will be reflected in the Redland Shire Planning Scheme Statement ofProposals due to be released in early 2002.
Planning position papers prepared as part Stage 3 are as follows:
1. Population & Demographics2. Residential Development3. Industry & Business4. Commercial & Retail Centres5. Rural6. Conservation & Open Space7. Constraints8. Environmental Management9. Cultural Heritage10. Community & Social Development 11. Transport12. Infrastructure
1.2 Purpose of this Paper
Cultural heritage sites and places are those parts of the Redland Shire landscape which are important to the community, or sections of the Community, because of their cultural heritage significance or value. The Environmental Protection Agencies ‘Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management’ defines cultural heritage sites and places as:
“Places, which contribute to an understanding of who we are and where we came from; they contribute to our sense of identity as individuals and our sense of continuity as a community. They are places which we would like to keep.”
In addition to its role in promoting social and community well being, cultural heritage also provides significant economic benefits through tourism and recreation.
It is important that the Redland Planning Scheme ensures that the Shire’s cultural heritage is protected for future generations. This position paper includes a discussion of:
• How Council currently deals with the issue of cultural heritage protection and management under the Planning Scheme;
• The legislative mechanisms (both Federal and State) that require the protection of cultural heritage places;
Cultural Heritage
8Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
• The history of the Shire;
• Known elements of indigenous and European heritage which require protection and management;
• State agency interests and requirements;
• Planning implications relating to cultural heritage; and
• The mechanisms which are available for dealing with cultural heritage protection (strategy areas).
1.3 Relevant Issues
The following paper considers a range of issues relevant to cultural heritage in the Shire. These include:
• The lack of detailed and comprehensive planning controls relating to cultural heritage within the Shire;
• The statutory obligations to protect areas of cultural heritage significance;
• The need and requirement to protect areas of Federal, state and local significance from incompatible land uses and activities that may adversely affect the cultural heritage values of an area;
• The requirement to collect further information regarding cultural heritage for certain geographic areas of the Shire;
• The State interest requirements for cultural heritage in planning schemes; and
• The planning scheme mechanisms available for the conservation of cultural heritage values.
2 Current Planning Scheme: Approach Analysis (Strengths andWeaknesses)
2.1 Introduction
The current policy approach to cultural heritage within the Shire is based on the :
• Strategic Plan; and
• The recently gazetted temporary local planning instrument – Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire.
Outside of these documents there are minimal planning requirements for cultural heritage within the planning scheme.
Cultural Heritage
9Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Table 1: Cultural Heritage – Existing Regulatory Elements
PlanningScheme
Component
ControlElement
Control Element Description
Key Features LocationalRelevance
Strategic Plan Strategies Urban Form StrategyAdopting measures to conserve cultural heritage places and precincts through:
• initiating a Heritage Register which lists places and precincts which have cultural heritage value, and which will be amended from time to time as more information about cultural heritage becomes available;
• ensuring development within or adjacent to cultural heritage places and precincts is designed to protect and enhance the heritage character of the streetscape or landscape and the integrity of these heritage values;
• ensuring that there is no unlawful interference with native title rights and interests withinRedland Shire. In this regard, The Commonwealth Native Title Act 1993 and the Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 provide for the recognition and protection of native title rights and interests;
• promoting land uses which allow for adaptive reuse of cu ltural heritage places and precincts in a manner consistent with sound heritage conservation principles;
• recognising areas subject to Native Title claims as locations where development will only be possible where consistent with the outcome of these claims ;
• exclusion of land uses which are detrimental to conservation of cultural heritage places and precincts; and
• discouraging unnecessary removal or demolition of places with cultural heritage significance.
• Whole of Shire
TemporaryPlanningInstrument –Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire
• To provide for the recognition, preservation and conservation of valued cultural heritage and traditional streetscape characteristics of the Shire;
• To encourage respectful restoration, renovation, maintenance, repair use and reuse of places which contribute to the Shire’s heritage and character; and
• Ensure new buildings, other structures and works are respectful of and are compatible with the special character of areas having cultural heritage or streetscape va lues.
• Whole of Shire
Cultural Heritage
10Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
PlanningScheme
Component
ControlElement
Control Element Description
Key Features LocationalRelevance
• Provides a table of assessment for differing development types that involve a defined heritage place.
• Provides a heritage code to assess development against.
• Lists those places included within the heritage register.
2.2 Strengths
• The Strategic Plan establishes through strategies a framework for the protection of heritage features within the Shire.
• The temporary local planning instrument provides a stop gap measure to ensure that recognised European heritage features within the Shire are protected.
2.3 Weaknesses
• The Strategic plan’s strategies have not been reinforced by the required actions until recently with the gazettal of the local planning instrument.
• The absence of any mention of heritage items within the planning scheme in the intent of any zone or designation.
• No ability to protect items of indigenous cultural heritage significance.
• The absence of a code requiring the investigation of cultural heritage values on sites that may have cultural heritage values.
• North Stradbroke Island and Coochiemudlo are not subject to the temporary local planning instrument.
Cultural Heritage
11Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3 Cultural Heritage
3.1 Legislative Context
The following federal and state legislation is relevant to cultural heritage within the Shire. This legislation includes:
• Australian Heritage Commission Act 1975-1990;
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984;
• Native Title Act 1993;
• Cultural Records (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987;
• Queensland Heritage Act 1992; and
• Integrated Planning Act 1997.
3.1.1 Australian Heritage Commission Act 1975-1990
The main purpose of the Australian Heritage Commission Act 1975-1990 is to provide for items of aesthetic, historic, scientific or social significance for present and future generations. Indigenous, archaeological and historic sites and places may be included on the Register of the National Estate after a rigorous process of assessment and consultation.
Important considerations include:
• Entry in the Register of the National Estate is not a land management decision. The way in which private, State and local government owners manage their national estate properties is not directly affected by listing.
• Entry of their property in the Register does not place any direct legal constraints on the actions of owners of private property. Owners of registered places are not required to change the way in which they manage, maintain, or dispose of, their property. Entry in the Register does not mean that owners have to give any public right of access to registered properties.
• The Register of the National Estate has legal implications only for the Commonwealth Ministers and Commonwealth instrumentalities, and has no legal effect on private, local or state government property owners.
• The inclusion on the register nonetheless highlights those areas and places that have recognised significance.
Those items within Redland Shire included on the Register of the National Estate are included in Appendix 1.
Cultural Heritage
12Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3.1.2 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 is "An Act to preserve and protect places, areas and objects of particular significance to Aboriginals, and for related purposes." Its purposes are:
“... the preservation and protection from injury or desecration of areas and objects in Australia and in Australian waters, being areas and objects that are of particular significance to Aboriginals in accordance with Aboriginal tradition.” (s 4)
It provides this protection indirectly, by enabling the Commonwealth Government to make short term and long term declarations to protect areas and objects of significance to Aboriginal people. The declarations are backed up by criminal sanctions. The Act operates concurrently with State & Territory laws and was intended for use as a last resort to protect Aboriginal heritage where State and Territory laws are ineffective or there is unwillingness to enforce them.
At present within the Shire there have been no declarations of areas under the Act (pers conv Environment Australia, 2001)
3.1.3 Native Title Act 1993
This legislation flows from the Australian High Court decision in Mabo case. 'Native Title' means the communal, group or individual rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in relation to lands and waters where:
• the rights and interests are possessed under acknowledged traditional laws, and
• observed by Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, by those laws and customs, have a connection with the land & waters, and,
• the rights and interests are recognised by the common law of Australia.
Within Redland Shire there has as yet been no native title determinations under the Act.
3.1.4 Cultural Records (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987
The Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 provides for the preservation and management of all components of Landscapes Queensland and the Queensland Estate; it fosters dissemination of knowledge on Landscapes Queensland and the Queensland Estate and promotes understanding of the historic continuum evidenced within Queensland. The Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 is backed up by penalty provisions.
Landscapes Queensland means areas or features within Queensland that have been or are used, altered or affected in some way by humans and are of significance to humans for anthropological, cultural, historic, prehistoric or societal reasons.The Queensland Estate means evidence of human occupation of the areas comprising Queensland at any time that is at least 30 years in the past that is not a facsimile/copy, recently constructed for the purpose of sale or not of historic or prehistoric significance.
Cultural Heritage
13Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
This Act also places obligations on person affecting Landscapes Queensland and will apply to the area of the Shire in addition to planning scheme provisions.
There are no declared designated landscape areas within Redland Shire. A partial survey of Redland Shire has been carried out, and 240 Queensland Estate sites are recorded on the EPA database. The Queensland Estate is the property of the State, and is a State interest.
3.1.5 Queensland Heritage Act 1992
Where sites are listed under the provisions of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, it is necessary for development on such sites to gain approval pursuant to Part 5 of the Act. Under the IDAS, such approvals will eventually be obtained at the same time as gaining any necessary approvals from Council pursuant to its planning scheme. However, basically the current situation will continue to apply. It is relevant to note that The Queensland Heritage Act 1992 is backed up by penalty provisions.
Those sites included within the Queensland Heritage Register are included in Tables ? and ? and are identified as sites of State significance.
3.1.6 Integrated Planning Act 1997
The purpose of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 is ecological sustainability (balance between ecological, economic and social outcomes) and the purpose of the Act includes ensuring that decision-making processes provide for equity between present and future generations. Cultural heritage therefore has distinct relevance to the purpose of the Act and advancing that purpose.
The Integrated Planning Act 1990 also stipulates in section 2.1.3 that a planning scheme must amongst other things:
(a)co-ordinates and integrates the matters (including the core matters) dealt with by the planning scheme, including any State and regional dimensions of the matters”
Core matters for the preparation of a planning scheme are set out in Schedule 1 of the Act and include:
(a) land use and development;
(b) infrastructure;
(c) valuable features.
Valuable features relate strongly to cultural heritage and are defined as the following:
“areas or places of cultural heritage significance (such as areas or places of indigenous cultural significance, or aesthetic, architectural, historical, scientific, social or technological significance, to the present generation or past or future generations)”
This paper is one of the mechanisms by which valuable features are to be addressed in the planning scheme preparation process.
Cultural Heritage
14Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
It is relevant to note that the Integrated Planning and Other Legislation Amendment Bill (IPOLA) received royal assent on19 December 2001. The Bill includes a new section (section 3.1.14) recognising and accommodating disparities between the IDAS process and processes for according procedural rights to native title interests under the Commonwealth Native Title Act 1993. The section provides that if notification is required under the Commonwealth Act, the decision stage of IDAS does not start until the notification requirements of that Act are complete.
Another matter relevant to cultural heritage and land use planning are the compensation provisions which are made available under IPA. These provisions which are set out in section 5.4 of the Act state that an owner of an interest in land is entitled to paid reasonable compensation by a local government (in this case Redland Shire) if an amendment to a planning scheme limits development rights. Therefore where Redland wishes to restrict the development rights of a land owner because of the cultural heritage values of a site Redland Shire could be subject to a claim for compensation.
3.2 Historical Overview
The following is an extract from the ‘Redland Heritage Study’ undertaken in 1995 for the Redland Shire Council regarding the history of the Shire.
“Early settlements in Australia were commonly planned, or grew up, around a fresh water source. Access to nearby settlements or communities for commerce or social intercourse was via these waterways or overland by dray track, bridle trail or road.
The earliest recorded European contact with the shire was Matthew Flinders’ brief visit to Coochiemudlo Island in 1799. Stradbroke Island was occupied during convict times and there was also occupation at Cleveland, Ormiston, parts of Capalaba and the Logan River before Queensland achieved self-government in 1859.
Cleveland Point was championed as the deep-water port for the Moreton Bay District by squatters and merchants from Ipswich and Brisbane. After Separation from New South Wales, it became the regional centre serving the bay islands and the mainland and was a popular 'watering place' from the 1860s onwards. Water transport was the predominant mode of communication until the railway came to the district. This in turn gave way to motor lorry transport in the early decades of this century.
Early industries included a service industry to government institutions on Stradbroke and Peel Islands, a scour works, oysters and fisheries, cattle, dairying, cotton and sugar cane growing. These were followed by a long and successful period of tropical fruit and vegetable growing. This gave the district a firm economic base and the deserved reputation of being the ‘salad bowl’ of South-East Queensland well into the twentieth century. Manufacturing industries were consolidated after World War II.
Sugar cane growing was first shown to be commercially practicable and profitable at Ormiston - this is therefore the site of the genesis of Queensland's sugar industry. The district was one of the first to use Kanaka labour in Queensland and the pioneer ethnic population was interesting and mixed.
Urbanisation commenced in the late 1880s, original alienated portions of land being split into blocks suitable for urban development and small farms. Cleveland, Wellington Point, Amity Point and to a lesser degree Redland Bay became more popular as holiday and weekend resorts and as leisure and recreation venues for day trippers. Periods of development are reflected in dwellings, commercial architecture, structures, memorials and earthworks, which generally represent the 1850s, 1890s, 1920s and post-War period. Much of this cultural heritage has been lost, as has the Aboriginal heritage contained in middens throughout the district, many of which were removed or destroyed for the process of lime making which was a major extractive industry in the Bay for the past 170 years.
Cultural Heritage
15Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
While the views from the mainland across the bay were appreciated for their splendour by the majority, the particular aesthetic and character of the mainland has also attracted people in creative occupations to live here.
Relief workers were employed in the district in the late 1930s and Wellington Point was occupied by American Forces during World War II. Boom Defences were established in Rous Channel at the South Entrance at this time.
Since the 1960s the district has followed a consistent pattern of almost uninterrupted progress. Cleveland has been the administrative centre since 1885 and continues to fulfil that role in response to the needs of the region.
Although tremendous change and urban growth have occurred since the 1960s and the relative importance of industries has altered, the essential overall pattern of development remains and Redland Shire continues to be an important regional centre in South East Queensland.
This overview history is presented chronologically and can be divided into 4 phases:
• Early Exploration and Occupation to 1859
• The Pioneer Years - 1859 to 1893
• Consolidating the Economic Base - 1893 to 1939
• The War and Beyond - 1939 to 1960s”
3.3 Non-indigenous Cultural Heritage
3.3.1 Introduction
As stated in section 1.2 of this paper the Environmental Protection Agencies ‘Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management’defines cultural heritage sites and places as:
“Places, which contribute to an understanding of who we are and where we came from; they contribute to our sense of identity as individuals and our sense of continuity as a community. They are places which we would like to keep.”
For non-indigenous cultural heritage this simply relates to those places which are non- indigenous. A place may be of non-indigenous cultural heritage if it generally satisfies one or more of the following criteria:
• The place has historical significance;
• The place has rarity value;
• The place is a good example of its type;
• The place has aesthetic significance;
• The place has creative or technical significance;
Cultural Heritage
16Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
• The place has social significance; and
• The place is important because of its special associations.
(Source: ‘Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management’, EPA Feb 2001)
3.3.2 Redlands Heritage Study
In 1999 the Redlands Heritage Study was completed for the mainland parts of the Shire. There were two main aims of the study:
1. To research the thematic cultural historic development of Redland Shire to identify, list and gain an in-depthunderstanding of heritage places and their context within the Shire.
2. To recommend promotional, regulatory and administrative processes to protect those heritage places.
One of the major outcomes of this study was the identification of those places that have cultural heritage significance to the Mainland and Southern Bay Islands areas of the Shire and also the recommendation of policy actions to protect those places. These places are shown in the tables in Appendix 2. It should be noted that Council is currently undertaking an audit of this list and as such it must be considered an Interim Register of Heritage Places. One of the main questions associated with the heritage study was how heritage significance was assessed. The brief required that the study team indicate levels of significance of heritage places. This assessment wasnot viewed in isolation but considered in the broader context, illustrating that heritage significance is relative. The study recognised that urban development is a dynamic process and heritage conservation (and demolition, adaptation) is a part of that process.
Items selected for inclusion in the inventory had to embody characteristics consistent with the criteria of established codes, specifically the Burra Charter and associated guidelines and the criteria encompassed by the Queensland Heritage Act 1992.
It was recognised in the study that there are always challenges or difficulties associated with nominating a ‘level’ of significance to possible heritage items. The following were used to identify the level of significance of a place.
• The level allocated to an item is dependent on the information available to the study team or assessors about that item during the study.
• Changes over a period of time may also upgrade or lower these classifications.
• In most cases subjective and qualitative judgements are required and these will inevitably vary between individuals to some degree.
• The study team was sensitive to the view of the Redland Community in respect of its interest in, and priorities for, heritage conservation as expressed by Council’s representatives and residents who participated in the workshop and subsequent consultation.
The classification categories used for the study were adopted from the NSW Department of Planning and Urban Affairs Levels of Significance:
Cultural Heritage
17Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
COMPARATIVE VALUES CONTEXT, MODIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
• Rarity - few surviving examples
• Group Value - distinctive character to area, collections
• Landmark Value - visual, innovative or historical prominence
• Representative Value - typical, variant
• Integrity - present physical condition
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE CONTINUALLY REASSESSED, IRREPLACEABLE ITEMS
• Local - reflect socio-economic and natural history
• Regional - regional historic themes
• State - important in State context
• National - AHC definition
• World Heritage - outstanding universal value
In addition for the purposes of the study the category “Local” was been interpreted to mean items or places that were considered to be significant to the heritage of their locality or suburb and/or contributed to the prevailing historic townscape character of their locality or suburb.
3.3.3 North Stradbroke Island
North Stradbroke Island has not been the subject of a specific non-indigenous heritage study. Only those places included on the Register of the National Estate and on the Queensland Heritage Register have been officially identified. These places include:
• Convict Store Site Complex, Junner St, Dunwich;
• Dunwich Cemetery, Bingle Rd, Dunwich; and
• Dunwich Public Hall, Junner St, Dunwich.
As part of local area planning processes or through a specific non-indigenous cultural heritage survey further places should be identified. In the interim, controls may be required to be included within the planning scheme that ensure that places constructed before a certain date are subject to a heritage code or special planning controls when a material change of use, building work or a reconfiguration of an allotment is proposed.
Cultural Heritage
18Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3.4 Indigenous Cultural Heritage
3.4.1 Introduction
Indigenous cultural heritage significance is not only restricted to places that were used by indigenous people living a traditional lifestyle prior to the introduction of other cultural influences. Because of the evolving nature of the indigenous culture it also relates to those places which have gained significance since occupation of the area by other cultures. The following is a list of the types of places that may require consideration in the planning scheme:
• Occupational sites;
• Stone artifact scatters;
• Stone quarries;
• Carved and scarred trees;
• Art sites;
• Sacred animals;
• Places with traditional associations, including association places, dreaming trails and story places;
• Waterways of significance in the practice of culture;
• Traditional food sources.
• Burials;
• Ceremonial grounds and stone arrangements;
• Fish traps;
• Axe grinding grooves;
• Historical traditional sites; and
• Cultural landscapes. (Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management, EPA, Feb 2001 and the State Coastal Management Plan s.2.5.1)
It has been recognised by the Redland Shire Council that there is insufficient information regarding the location and values of the above. As a result it is proposed to undertake an Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study for the Shire covering the mainland, North Stradbroke Island and also the Bay Islands. Because of the short time frame in which to draft the planning scheme this study will result in amendments to the new IPA planning scheme. Details of the study are as follows:
Cultural Heritage
19Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
“Purpose of the Study
The purpose of undertaking an Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study for the Shire is to develop a greater community appreciation of the history and heritage of the Indigenous communities of Redland Shire and to develop a framework for the protection and management of Indigenous cultural heritage values, especially in relation to place.
Objectives
• To provide a foundation for the development of Redland Shire Planning Scheme provisions (in accordance with the Integrated Planning Act) which facilitate the protection and management of Indigenous cultural heritage places.
• To identify a variety of mechanisms, in addition to Planning Scheme provisions, which will enhance the protection and management of Indigenous cultural heritage places in Redland Shire.
• To provide a historical reference, available to the community at large, which provides information about the history and heritage of Indigenous communities in Redland Shire.
• To identify measures through which Redland Shire Council, the Quandamooka Land Council and the Turrbal Land Council can promote community appreciation of Indigenous communities and their history and heritage.
• To develop a closer working relationship between Redland Shire Council and local indigenous communities to promote the protection of Indigenous cultural heritage values.”
3.4.2 Mainland
As previously stated there is limited documented information available on cultural heritage values on the mainland part of the Shire. Information will be collected through the proposed Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study for the Shire.Presently the only known sites for the mainland part of the Shire include:
• A bora ground located at Hilliards Creek, Cleveland; and
• Sites under the Register of the National Estate.
A partial survey of Redland Shire has been carried out, and 240 Queensland Estate sites are recorded on the EPA database. These sites are all “areas of State significance (Indigenous Traditional Owner cultural resources)” and require consideration under the planning scheme.
EPA maintains the Queensland Estates site database and will provide Redland Shire with information on these sites to help to protect and manage these sites through the planning scheme.
3.4.3 North Stradbroke Island
North Stradbroke Island has been the subject of a significant study titled the North Stradbroke Island/Minjerribah Planning and Management Study. This study has examined a range of issues relating to the planning and management of North Stradbroke Island. The study has however not identified sites that have indigenous cultural heritage values. This will be achieved via the Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study for the Shire.
Cultural Heritage
20Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
A partial survey of Redland Shire has been carried out, and 240 Queensland Estate sites are recorded on the EPA database. These sites are all “areas of State significance (Indigenous Traditional Owner cultural resources)” and require consideration under the planning scheme.
EPA maintains the Queensland Estates site database and will provide Redland Shire with information on these sites to help to protect and manage these sites through the planning scheme.
Because of the lack of information it will be necessary for the planning scheme in the interim to include triggers to ensure that those areas that may have cultural heritage significance are appropriately assessed.
3.4.4 Southern Moreton Bay Islands
The Southern Moreton Bay Islands have been the subject of a significant study titled the ‘Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Strategy’. Significant matters raised in the study include:
• The Quandamooka people are the traditional owners of Moreton Bay including the Southern Bay Islands.
• Places of Aboriginal heritage significance may be found on all landforms of Russell, Maclaey, Lamb and Karragarra Islands.
• Archaelogical sites are most likely to be found in coastal and immediate hinterland areas with high points in the landscape a possible location for early-mid Holocene sites or even sites of the late Pleistocene age.
• Resource areas and story places of significance are likely to be found associated with marine and swamp resources and high places in the landscape.
• Those known indigenous cultural heritage sites on the islands are shown in Appendix 3.
WESROC and EPA are developing a pilot project to model archaeological potential in the landscape, and if successful this approach can be used to refine the previous points, in conjunction with the Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study for the Shire.
A partial survey of Redland Shire has been carried out, and 240 Queensland Estate sites are recorded on the EPA database. These sites are all “areas of State significance (Indigenous Traditional Owner cultural resources)” and require consideration under the planning scheme.
EPA maintains the Queensland Estates site database and will provide Redland Shire with information on these sites to help to protect and manage these sites through the planning scheme.
Cultural Heritage
21Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3.5 State Agency Interests
3.5.1 RFGM 2001
Section 12 - Cultural Development
Objective: “To ensure that the region’s diverse cultural resources and skills are utilised in the future planning and development of South East Queensland.”
Principles: “12.2 The recognition of cultural values in SEQ, through rigorous debate, research, assessment and analysis, should inform planning and policy development in the region.”
12.4 Art and cultural development opportunities should be available and accessible to all members of the community, including people from varied cultural backgrounds, age groups and abilities.
12.5 The integral part that Indigenous cultures play in regional cultural development should be recognised in planning activities throughout the region.
12.6 Sites and traditions of cultural and heritage significance in both the built and natural environments should be identified and conserved.
Actions: 12.6 Incorporate arts and cultural development policies into regional and local planning cycles, including corporate plans, planning schemes and assessment processes.
12.7 In all policies, which influence the development of the region’s art and cultural life, address the social justice principles of access, equity, participation and equality.
12.9 Continue a program of Indigenous cultural heritage surveys and mapping, and develop and maintain inventories of significant Indigenous heritage places and sites. These surveys and inventories would be prepared with the support and involvement of Traditional Owners and would draw information from studies such as the SEQ Cultural Heritage Places Study.
12.10 Continue a program of historic cultural heritage surveys and mapping, and develop and maintain inventories of significant historical heritage places and sites. These inventories would draw information from studies such as the SEQ Cultural Heritage Places Study and Local Government studies prepared in consultation with local community groups, including Indigenous peoples.
Cultural Heritage
22Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3.5.2 State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Historical) in Planning Schemes.
The following shows the requirements under the above policy and how these requirements are to be incorporated into the planning scheme.
Table 3.5.2 State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Historical) in Planning Schemes
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
Part 1- Any statutory obligations, programs or policies of the State that must be given effect through a planning scheme
There are no aspects of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992,Environmental Protection Agency programs or endorsed policies that relate to this category of State interest.
N/A
Part 2 - Any programs or policies of the State which should be given effect through a planning scheme.
1. Places or areas of known historical cultural heritage value (including sites on the Queensland Heritage Register), should be identified in local government areas and represented spatially or listed in planning schemes.
• Places or areas of known historical cultural heritage value will be identified on the planning scheme maps.
2. For local government areas where:
• comprehensive historical cultural heritage surveys have not been undertaken; or
• partial surveys have been undertaken and potential, but as yet unidentified, State interest may still exist:
Potential areas or sites of historical cultural heritage value should be identified spatially in planning schemes in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency. Planning schemes should also require appropriate investigation of likely impacts on historical values where development is proposed in a place of potential historical value.
• The planning scheme will identify high risk areas in a spatial sense where further work can be undertaken to establish the cultural heritage values of an area.
3. Places/areas of identified and potential historical cultural heritage value should be protected through appropriate planning scheme provisions.
• Planning provisions will be developed to protect knownand potential cultural heritage sites. This will be undertaken through a ‘Cultural Heritage Code’.
Cultural Heritage
23Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
4. Any material change of use (start of a new use) on land adjacent to places entered in the Queensland Heritage Register, or building or operational works within five meters of the registered place which could significantly impact on its cultural heritage values, should be assessable development in the planning scheme, and any potential detrimental impacts including cumulative impacts managed through appropriate codes or other mechanisms in the planning scheme (for example making them impact assessable).
• The planning scheme will be drafted to ensure that firstly the applicant is aware that referral co-ordintationis required for sites adjacent to or on the Queesnland Heritage Register.
• The planning scheme will also recognise this fact by a higher level of assessment as well as calling up a ‘Cultural Heritage Code’.
5. Planning schemes should address relevant historical cultural heritage provisions and commitments of any final Regional Framework for Growth Management (RFGM) and regional plans, applicable to the area, to protect historical cultural heritage values.
• The planning scheme will address the requirements of the RFGM in relation to cultural heritage. Refer to section 3.5.1 of this report
Part 3 Any statutory obligations, programs, policies, and property interests of the State that should not be adversely affected by planning scheme provisions.
1. Planning schemes should include provisions which ensures the Environmental Protection Agency is notified should parts of the Queensland Estate with historical significance in respect of which there is no identifiable legal owner be found during development and maintenance activities.
• A partial survey of Redland Shire has been carried out, and 240 Queensland Estate sites are recorded on the EPA database. These sites are all “areas of State significance (Indigenous Traditional Owner cultural resources)” and require consideration under the planning scheme. EPA maintains the Queensland Estates site database and will provide Redland Shire with information on these sites to help to protect and manage these sites through the planning scheme.
• Planning provisions will be developed to protect potential cultural heritage sites. This will be undertaken through a ‘Cultural Heritage Code’.
Cultural Heritage
24Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
3.5.3 State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Indigenous) in Planning Schemes.
The following shows the requirements under the above policy and how these requirements are to be incorporated into the planning scheme.
Table 3.5.3 State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Indigenous) in Planning Schemes
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
Part 1 - Any statutory obligations, programs or policies of the State that must be given effect through a planning scheme
1. Local governments must ensure that planning scheme provisions are consistent with the indigenous cultural heritage interests identified in plans developed under the Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Management Act 1993 and the Nature Conservation Act 1992.
• There are no areas within the Shire are subject to provisions of Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Management Act 1993 and the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (in relation to indigenous heritage).
Part 2 - Any programs or policies of the State which should be given effect through a planning scheme.
1. Local government in the preparation of planning schemes should have regard to any indigenous cultural heritage interests identified in a Coastal Management Plan developed under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995.
• There is not a current and completed coastal management plan covering Redland Shire. .
2. Where whole or in part indigenous cultural heritagesurveys of the local government area are intended to be used as the basis for scheme provisions, such surveys and resultant management plans should be undertaken in consultation with relevant indigenous groups and the Environmental Protection Agency.Where culturally appropriate, known sites/places should be identified in planning schemes.
• The Redland Shire Council will undertake a Cultural Heritage Survey (indigenous) for the Mainland and North Stradbroke Island. Council plans to request funding from the EPA.
3. For local government areas where:
• comprehensive indigenous cultural heritage surveys have not been undertaken; and/or
• partial surveys have been undertaken and potential, but as yet unidentified, State interest may still exist; and/or
• sacred/secret sites are involved:
• The spatial identification of zones of sensitivity will be undertaken in the planning scheme maps. These will act as a trigger for the protection of values and until the Indigenous Cultural Heritage Survey is undertaken for the Shire. The EPA will assist Redland Shire in undertaking the spatial identification of zones of sensitivity for the planning scheme maps, through sharing Queensland Estate sites database information, and helping to model archaeological potential in the landscape, by refining the hypotheses set out in s3.4.4.
Cultural Heritage
25Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
Spatial identification of potential areas of indigenous cultural heritage value (‘zones of sensitivity’) should be developed in planning schemes in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency and relevant indigenous groups. Planning schemes should also require detailed investigation of potential impacts including cumulative impacts on cultural heritage values where development is proposed in an identified ‘zone of sensitivity’.
4. Places/zones of identified and potential indigenous cultural heritage values should be protected through appropriate planning scheme provisions developed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency and relevant indigenous groups.
• Planning provisions will be developed to protect known and potential cultural heritage sites. This will be undertaken through a ‘Cultural Heritage Code’ or similar that will take into account the model planning scheme provisions for Indigenous cultural heritage included in the EPA Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management. .
5. Planning schemes should make assessable development for any reconfiguration of a lot (including operational works associated with the reconfiguration) or material change of use (start of a new use) (otherthan development for a dwelling house, outbuilding or farm building), which could have a significant impact on the cultural heritage value of places listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s database of Queensland Estate Sites. Any potential detrimentalimpacts including cumulative impacts, should be managed through appropriate codes or other mechanisms in the planning scheme (for example making them impact assessable).
• The planning scheme will be drafted to ensure that firstly the applicant is aware that referral co-ordinationis required for sites adjacent to or on designated Queensland Estate sites.
.
6. Planning schemes should prescribe as assessable development any reconfiguration of a lot (including any associated operational works) or material change of use (start of a new use) associated with development in or adjacent to a Designated Landscape Area. Any potential detrimental impact should be managed through appropriate codes or other mechanisms in the planning scheme (for example making them impactassessable).
• The planning scheme will be drafted to ensure that firstly the applicant is aware that referral co-ordinationis required for sites adjacent to or on designated landscape areas.
• It should be recognised that there are no such areas within the Shire presently.
7. Planning schemes should address relevant indigenous cultural heritage provisions and commitments of any final Regional Framework for Growth Management (RFGM) i l l li bl t th t
• The planning scheme will address the requirements of the RFGM in relation to cultural heritage. Refer to section 3.5.1 of this report
Cultural Heritage
26Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
(RFGM) or regional plans, applicable to the area, to protect indigenous cultural heritage values.
Part 3 Any statutory obligations, programs, policies, and property interests of the State that should not be adversely affected by planning scheme provisions.
STATE INTEREST PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENT INCORPORATION OF REQUIREMENT
1. Planning schemes should include provisions which ensure the Environmental Protection Agency is notified should sites/objects of indigenous cultural heritage significance (that have not previously been identified) be found during development and maintenance activities.
• Planning provisions will be developed to protect potential cultural heritage sites. This will be undertaken through a ‘Cultural Heritage Code’.
Cultural Heritage
27Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
4 Summary of Planning Implications• Redland Shire has a rich and diverse cultural heritage that requires protection and management through the planning
scheme.
• The existing planning scheme does not provide due recognition and controls protecting cultural heritage values and items within the Shire;
• Those items and areas included in the Register of the National Estate and Queensland Heritage Register requireprotection and recognition under the planning scheme.The planning scheme is required to be drafted to ensure that if a declaration is made under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 then that site is protected and given due recognition.
• There are 240 recorded Queensland Estate sites in the Shire that are protected under the Cultural Record Act and that should not be adversely affected by planning scheme provisions.Areas declared under the Native Title Act 1993(excluding private land) should be assessed for cultural heritage significance through the development approval process.
• Those items and places of local significance identified in the Temporary Local Planning Instrument – Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire require protection and recognition under the planning scheme.
• Further assessment of certain geographic areas of the Shire is required relating to potential cultural heritage values and sites. These areas include:
- Mainland and North Stradbroke Island relating to indigenous cultural heritage;- North Stradbroke Island relating to non-indigenous cultural heritage.
• Those areas of the Shire that have not been the subject of a cultural heritage survey must be protected through the provision of ‘triggers’ in the planning scheme. These triggers should enable the community, Council and developers to determine a sites significance and the appropriate management of that site, if it is deemed to have heritage significance.
• It is important to not only protect an identified site but also those areas adjacent to a site to ensure that the development adjacent to sites recognise the heritage significance.
• Issues relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 as a separate dot point from the issues under the Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987.
• The planning scheme will be drafted to ensure that Designated Landscapes Areas and Queensland Estate sites under tthe Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 require protection and due recognition through the planning scheme; and note that areas which have the potential to have Indigenous heritage values (‘zones of sensitivity’) should be assessed for cultural heritage significance through the development approval process.
Cultural Heritage
28Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
5 Planning Strategy Areas
5.1 Introduction
It is important to note that the planning scheme can only address those matters of cultural heritage associated with the management of development and growth. Non-scheme measures must be regarded as being complimentary measures to the planning scheme and include matters such as grants, financial incentives and educational initiatives. The EPA ‘Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Management’ state that planning scheme measures should
“……..be used to specifically manage development that has the potential to impact upon cultural heritage sites, items or places. This should be done in a way that clearly links them to the desired outcomes of the scheme.
An IPA planning scheme should contain:
• An inventory of places of local heritage significance;
• Known places of Indigenous heritage significance;
• Spatial definition of those areas which have the potential to have indigenous heritage values (‘zones of sensivity’)
The plan should also contain codes and other mechanisms which enable these places to be effectively managed through the development assessment process.”
5.2 Protecting identified sites
The planning scheme should include an inventory of all those places that are known to have cultural heritage significance.These places should be placed in an inventory/ies and also annotated on the plan maps or included as an overlay. These places include:
• Sites declared under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (presently none identified in Redland Shire);
• Sites included on the Queensland Heritage Register. .
• Any place listed on the Register of the National Estate;
• Places identified as part of the Redlands Heritage Study and the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study (It should be noted that the sites identified are currently being reviewed by Council);
• Places identified as Queensland Estate sites and appropriately annotated on a map overlay.
• Places of Indigenous significance identified in the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study.
• Further places will be identified in the proposed Redland Shire Indigenous Cultural Heritage Places Study.
Cultural Heritage
29Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
5.3 Development adjacent to known sites
It is important that development adjacent to known cultural heritage sites does not adversely impact upon the values of the known heritage site. As a result the planning scheme should include triggers to ensure that proposals adjacent to known sites are appropriately assessed. These triggers can ensure:
• a higher level of assessment;
• the referral to nominated state agencies and bodies; and
• assessment against appropriate standards and controls (codes).
5.4 Protecting unidentified sites
It is important that those sites that have not been identified as having cultural heritage values or significance are protected from inappropriate development. Specifically areas where sites that have not been identified in Redland Shire include:
• The mainland and North Stradbroke Island relating to indigenous cultural heritage.
• North Stradbroke Island relating to non-indigenous cultural heritage.
It is acknowledged that further studies will be undertaken, however in the interim it is important that values and sites are not lost. Mechanisms by which this can be achieved include:
• For non-indigenous cultural heritage – developing demolition controls for buildings of a certain age (eg pre 1946). This would only apply on North Stradbroke Island.
• For indigenous cultural heritage developing a system of triggers that alerts the assessment manager during the assessment process. These triggers would require that the development proposal to be assessed against an indigenous cultural heritage code. These triggers can include:
- Significant ridgelines and escarpments with native forest cover;- Areas designated Public Open Space or reserved as public open space;- Any land in a natural state within 100 metres of a natural perennial watercourse or wetland area;- Any land subject to Native Title Claim;- Land known to have indigenous cultural heritage values by the traditional owners.
• Any land designated rural retaining native vegetation cover proposed to be developed, when the proposed land uses are considered by Council or its delegate, as likely to be irreconcilable with Indigenous cultural heritage values;
• Any land made known to Council or its delegate to be of Indigenous cultural heritage value; and
• Sites, items or places known by traditional owners to be of Indigenous cultural heritage value, and where this knowledge is conveyed to the owner of the land and/or the developer.
Cultural Heritage
30Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
5.5 Aspects of development
• A planning scheme has the ability to make all aspects of development assessable development recognising the constraints placed by Schedule 8 of IPA and Schedule 5 of the Standard Building Regulations . These types of development include:- Material change of use;- Building works;- Operational works;- Plumbing and drainage works;- And reconfiguration of an allotment.
• For those sites included on the Queensland Heritage Register the EPA recommends that all aspects of development are assessable to ensure that all applications for development are referred to the EPA as a concurrence agency.
• Likewise, those sites included on the Register of the National Estate should be protected by ensuring that all aspects of development on those sites are assessable.
• The scheme can ensure that designated landscape areas under the Cultural Records Act also trigger assessment.At present there are no such designations within the Shire.
• For those sites included on Councils’ Schedule of European Places (Temporary Local Planning Instrument – CulturalHeritage Significance of Redland Shire) the reconfiguration of an allotment, a material change of use, building work and operational work are assessable development. This is considered appropriate for locally significant development.
• Places identified as Queensland Estate sites and appropriately annotated on a map overlay to trigger assessment.
5.6 Identification of control elements
The following requirements can be included within a heritage code or similar.
5.6.1 Indigenous cultural heritage
• Ensuring that developments are designed so as to avoid detrimental impacts on places of cultural heritage significance by:- Existing sites, items or places are incorporated into open space areas of development.- The location of buffers between places of cultural heritage significance.- Restriction of access to places of cultural heritage significance.- Provision of signage identifying places of cultural heritage significance.- The density of development is reduced adjacent to known sites.
• Protecting places of cultural heritage significance during construction and maintenance.- Include a requirement that a management plan be developed.- Management plan to be developed and implemented in consultation with local indigenous groups.
5.6.2 Non- indigenous cultural heritage
• Principles addressed in the Temporary Local Planning Instrument Cultural Heritage Significance Code will be assessed and incorporated into the new planning scheme.
Cultural Heritage
31Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
References1. Queensland Government (2001) Environmental Planning Resource Manual, Planning and Development Assessment
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Division, Queensland.
2. Queensland Government (2001) Regional Landscape Values: Guidelines for their Protection in Local Government Planning Schemes in SEQLD, Department of Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Government; Queensland.
3. Queensland University of Technology (1992) Coochiemudlo Island Landscape Planning Study, Landscape Planning Group, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
4. Redland Shire Council (1997) Strategic Plan Review: Planning Study Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
5. Redland Shire Council (1998) Development & Control Plan 5 : Part B East Thornlands Planning Study Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
6. Redland Shire Council (1998) Development Control Plan 5 : East Thornlands LAP Redland Shire Council, QLD.
7. Redland Shire Council (1998) Development Control Plan 5 West Thornlands LAP Redland Shire Council, QLD.
8. Redland Shire Council (1999) CD-ROM Redlands Heritage Study, Woods Bagot, Queensland.
9. Redland Shire Council (1999) Planning & Land Use Strategy: Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Strategy, GHD, Brisbane.
10. Redland Shire Council (1999) The Cleveland Point Lighthouse Conservation Plan International Conservation Services, Brisbane.
11. Redland Shire Council (2000) Draft Redland Shire Community Plan Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
12. Redland Shire Council (2000) North Stradbroke Island/Minjerribah: Planning and Management Study, Elliot Whiteing & Associates, Brisbane.
13. Redland Shire Council (2001) Criteria Used to Determine Cultural Heritage Significance, Redland Shire Council, Brisbane.
14. Redland Shire Council (2001) Explanatory Statement : Transitional Planning Scheme Policy – Residential Code for Multiple Dwelling Development 2001 Redland Shire Council, QLD.
15. Redland Shire Council (2001) Temporary Local Planning Instrument: Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire, Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
16. Redland Shire Council (2001) Vision 2005 & Beyond : Redland Draft Community Plan Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
Cultural Heritage
32Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
17. Redland Shire Council (no date) 1996 – 2001 Corporate Plan : Reshaping Council Redland Shire Council, Queensland.
Cultural Heritage
33Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Appendix 1 – Register of the National Estate1. Bird Island Environmental Park, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
2. Blue Lake National Park, Tazi Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
3. Cleveland Hotel (former), 105 - 107 Shore St North, Cleveland, [Redland Shire], QLD (Indicative Place)
4. Cleveland Lighthouse, Shore St North, Cleveland, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
5. Convict Store Site Complex, Junner St, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Indicative Place)
6. Dunwich Cemetery, Bingle Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
7. Dunwich Public Hall, Junner St, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Indicative Place)
8. Goat Island Environmental Park, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
9. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
10. Indigenous Place, Cleveland, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
11. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
12. Indigenous Place, Point Lookout, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
13. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
14. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
15. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
16. Indigenous Place, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
17. King Island Environmental Park, Wellington Point, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
18. Myora Environmental Park, East Coast Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Interim List)
19. North Stradbroke Island (Myora section), East Coast Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Interim List)
20. North Stradbroke Island (central section), Tazi Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
21. North Stradbroke Island (northern section), Claytons Rd, Amity, [Redland Shire], QLD (Interim List)
22. North Stradbroke Island (southern section), Tazi Rd, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
Cultural Heritage
34Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
23. Ormiston House, 287 Wellington St, Ormiston, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
24. Peel Island, Dunwich, [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
25. Remnant Koala Habitat, West Mount Cotton Rd, Daisy Hill, [Redland Shire], QLD (Indicative Place)
26. Southern and Eastern Moreton Bay, Cleveland , [Redland Shire], QLD (Registered)
27. St Andrews Church of England, Wellington St, Ormiston , [Redland Shire], QLD (Indicative Place)
Source: http://www.ahc.gov.au/cgi-bin/register/fsearch.pl
Cultural Heritage
35Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Appendix 2 – Inventory of Places – Local Heritage Site List Mainland
Those areas and places identified by the Redlands Heritage Study for the mainland are shown in the table below. It should be noted that Council is currently undertaking an audit of this list and as such it must be considered an Interim Register of Heritage Places. :
Schedule of European Heritage Places on the Mainland as at 27.08.01
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
3 Lisa Street, Cleveland Lot 9 on C644
(Reserve 1436)
Pioneer Cemetery
No.11
Landscaped park. Original site of ClevelandCemetery.
*
4 Shore Street East, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP60350 Fruit Shed (No. 5) c.1920-30s gable roof; corrugated iron fruit shed
*
5 Shore Street East, Cleveland
Lot 2 on RP142152 No. 3 c.1920-30s two storey; pyramid roof; shop *
6 Shore Street East,Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP120477 No. 1 Two storey residence; originally shop; c.1920-30
*
7 Smith St, Cleveland Lot 1 on CP864383 RSL Hall
(No.44-76
c.1928 large lowset timber hall, gable roof masonry entry
*
8 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 10 on C664 Former Cleveland Police Station
(No. 1 -11)
Low set symmetrical timber frame, hip and gable roofs c.1936
* *
9 Shore Street, Cleveland Road Reserve (between Lot10 on C664 & Lot 14 on GTP2997)
Cleveland War Memorial c.1925 stone war memorial. Lauder. *
10 Middle Street, Cleveland
Lot 10 on RP234061 No. 204 Former Station Master’s House; restored single storey, timber framed dwelling
*
11 Middle Street, Cleveland
Lot 6 on RP43359 No. 200 Doctor’s House; single storey; gable roof; curved verandah roof.
*
12 Queen Street, Cleveland
Lot 7 on C730495 Anglican Church (No. 24) c.1910-20 timber frame; steep pitch gable roof.
*
13 Queen Street, Cleveland
Lot 7 on C730495 Anglican Church Hall (No. 24)
Gable roof, timber frame, low set, projecting entry porch.
*
14 Shore Street East, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP159272 St Paul’s Anglican Church (No.76)
c.1874 small brick church; Gothic style; spire * *
15 Middle Street East, Cleveland
Lot 66 on SP115554 GJ Walter Park (No. 240) Recreation reserve; promenade of pine treesnear foreshore
*
16 North Street, Cleveland Lot 11 on RP154679 Grand View Hotel (No. 49-51)
Two storey masonry hotel c.1840 * *
Cultural Heritage
36Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
17 North Street, Cleveland Lot 6 and 7 on C14561
Near No.45 & 47 (No. 47-49)
Massive, mature Banyan Tree *
18 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 6 on RP884286 Cassim’s Hotel No. 109A) Single storey/two storey masonry hotel * *
19 Cleveland Point, Cleveland
Road Reserve (Adjacent to Lot 391 onSL10999)
(Reserve 220)
Cleveland Lighthouse Timber framed hexagonal tower, narrowwalkway to upper level; moved to new site
* *
20 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 3 on RP96309 N0. 232 Gable roof dwellingc.1890-1910;brickchimney; curves tin window hoods
*
21 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 109 on CP850172 & Lot 108 on SL801745
Lighthouse Restaurant
(No. 237-239)
c.1860-80 two storey masonry building 1930 kiosk
* *
22 Middle Street, Cleveland
Road Reserve near No. 202 (Lot 2 on RP43359)
Large street tree near Doctor’s Residence *
24 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 2 on RP889614 No.25 G.J. Walker House; large villa style residence; details
*
25 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 6 and 7
on RP1682
No.18 c.1920-30s timber framed, high set workers dwelling
*
26 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 1 on SP106844 No.128 c.1925-30s pyramid roof residence; front shop *
27 Shore Street, Cleveland Point, Cleveland
Lot 501 on C14568 No.149 Foreshore Sea Wall; coral, rubble, concrete construction
*
28 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 501 on C14568 No.149 Courthouse Restaurant; c.1853 painted brick; boat-like profile to verandah balustrade
* *
29 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP1677 No.153 c.1900 exposed timber frame; cropped pyramid roof dwelling
*
30 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 403 on C14568 No.154 c1890-1910 gable r oof workers dwelling *
31 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 502 on C14568 No.151 c.1880s-1910 pyramid roof workers dwelling *
32 Paxton Street, Cleveland
Lot 401 on C14568 No.5 c.1950-60s flats; two storey fibro; hopper windows
*
33 Shore Street North,Cleveland
Lot 4 on RP1677 No.157 c.1890-1900 large hipped roof possibly boarding house
*
34 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 508 on C14568 No.165 Rare butterfly roof example c.1950-60 *
35 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 408 C14568 No.164 Califo rnian bungalow c.1928-30 *
36 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP211344 No.162 Seaforth Cottage; low set, timber framed, gabled roof dwelling
*
Cultural Heritage
37Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
37 Shore Street North, Cleveland
Lot 25 on C649 No.196 c.1950-60s skillion roof; fibro clad dwelling *
39 Passage Street, Cleveland (No. 125-129)
Lot 1 on RP172054 No.125-129 c1920-30s masonry block residence; Quoin effect
*
40 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 13 on RP76981 No.106 Low set timber framed gable roof dwelling *
41 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 5 on C628 No.103 c.1920s symmetrical workers dwelling *
42 Passage Street, Cleveland
Lot 3 on RP159593 No.102 Dean Lodge Trees *
43 Passage Street, Cleveland
Passage Street Road Reserve (Bounded by Queen Street and Coburg Street East intersections
Avenue of Palms *
46 Longland Street, Cleveland
Lot 130 and 131
on RP1728
No.27 c.1920-30s Californian Bungalow *
47 Longland Street, Cleveland
Lot 85 on RP1728 No.31 Low set c.1930 hipped roof, fibro clad dwelling
*
48 Erobin Street, Cleveland
Lot 41 on C628 No.31 c.1910 steep pitched gable roof, chamfer boarding workers cottage
*
49 Erobin Street, Cleveland
Lot 34 and 35
on C628
No.28 c.1920s workers dwelling *
50 Ray Street, Cleveland Lot 1 on RP75824 No.9 Asymmetrical, two storey timber dwelling *
51 Russell, Cleveland Lot 68 on C628 No.3 c.1950-60s gable roof, slimline chamfers matching fence
*
52 Erobin Street, Cleveland
Lot 84 on C628 No.8 L-shaped, timber framed structure c.1960, stone fireplace
*
56 Bloomfield Street, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP68564 No.159-163 Low set commercial building, skillion roof *
57 Bloomfield Street, Cleveland
Lot 5 on RP61203 No.153-157 Low set brick shop, awing over street *
58 Bloomfield Street, Cleveland
Lot 1 on RP185794 Qld Fruit Growers No.137-151
Smallest of Bloomfield St, shops, parapet Deco influence
*
59 Bloomfield Street, Cleveland
Lot 2 on RP73868
Lot 1 on RP98883
No.162 Previously garage/service station, adaptive reuse
*
60 Wellington Street, Ormiston
Lot 2 on RP1705 St Andrews Anglican Church (No.209-213)
Small timber church, steep pitched gable roof * *
61 Empire Vista, Ormiston Lot 76 on RP886453 “Doombawah” (No.26) Large timber frame villa, many alterations *
Cultural Heritage
38Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
62 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 199 on SL8594 Wellington Point Reserve (No.2a)
Land reserve, panoramic views, mature trees *
64a Champion Lane, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on SL800254 No.18 Two dwellings, one bungalow style, one pyramid roof
*
64b Champion Lane, Wellington Point
Lot 2 and 3
on RP14179
No.16 Two dwellings, one b ungalow style, one pyramid roof
*
65 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 158 on SL5400 No.27 High set, pyramid roof dwelling c.1920-30s *
67 Esplanade, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP117295 No.12 Dwelling complex of small timber structures *
68 Esplanade, WellingtonPoint
Lot 17 and 18
on RP40809
No.17 Simple fibro clad, hipped roof, low set *
69 Esplanade, Wellington Point
Lot 19 on RP40809 No.19 c.1900 low set, timber frame, cropped pyramid roof
*
70 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP71799 No.162 c.1930-40s low brick plinth, chamfer boards *
71 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP14174 No.169 c.1930-40s low hipped roof, brick plinth *
72 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP126710 No.190 High set, exposed timber frame, c.1920 hip roof
*
73 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP216854 No.175 Pyramid roof, timber frame collection of buildings
*
74 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 39 on RP14172 No.216 Verandah infill glass louvres, gable roof *
75 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP843980 No.207 c.1890s “Seaview” wide timber boards, brick fire place
*
76 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 4 on RP14183 No.37 High set triple gable dwelling *
79 Wellesley Street, Wellington Point
Lot 218-220
on RP14168
No.15 Low set, timber frame, unobservable *
80 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP854708 No.575-585 Asymmetrical, high set, timber frame dwelling *
81 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP842246 “Whepstead House” (No.563)
Elegant 21/2 storey timber frame villa * *
82 Edith Street, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP808682 No.7-11 c.1900-1910 Old Bungalow style residence *
83 Edith Street, Wellington Point
Lot 81 and 82
on RP14083
No.27 Lovely example c.1920-30s symmetrical hi-set workers dwelling
*
Cultural Heritage
39Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
84 Buckland Street, Wellington Point
Lot 4 on RP140465 No.38-40 Hipped roof, small bungalow style residence *
85 Burnett Street, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP113465 No.10 c.1930 pyramid roof, villa residence high set *
86 Station Street, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP165180 No.46 Unusual L -shaped villa residence with diagonal flanking verandah
*
87 Buckland Street, Wellington Point
Lot 147 and 148
on RP14083
No.18 Californian bungalow style, verandah encl casements
*
88 Buckland Street, Wellington Point
Lot 145 and 146
on RP14083
No.14 Large single gable, bungalow style workers house
*
89 Buckland Street, Wellington Point
Lot 143 and 144
on RP14083
No.10 Californian bungalow, 11/2 storey, stucco finish
*
90 Station Street, Wellington Point
Lot 118 on SL3262 Church Hall
(No.19-21)
c.1950-60s butterfly roof entry porch *
91 Station Street, Wellington Point
Lot 118 on SL3262 St James Anglican Church (No.19-21)
Erected 1913, timber frame, steep gable roof *
92 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP107272 No.509 Low set hipped, curved verandah roof *
93 Harris Street, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP97097 No.1 High set workers dwelling c.1890s with steep pitched roof, gable roof
*
94 Harris Street, Wellington Point
Lot 64 and 65
on RP14152
No.6 Possible railway building, low set c.1910 *
95 Harris Street, Wellington Point
Lot 58 on RP14152 No.20 Two storey residence, single storey shop c.1920s
*
96 Harris Street, Wellington Point
Lot 60 and 61
on RP14152
No.14 High set, cropped pyramid roof workers dwelling
*
97 Arthur Street, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP126049 No.25 Low set, steep pitched cropped pyramid roof, exposed timber framing
*
98 Edith Street, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP134879
No.2 Exposed timber frame villa residence *
99 Fernbourne Road, Wellington Point
Lot 139 RP14151 No.35 c.1880-1900, unusual small workers cottage *
100 Fernbourne Road, Wellington Point
Lot 1 on RP884906 No.19 c.1900 Victorian style villa residence *
101 Hilliards Creek (off Station Street), Wellington Point
Lot 10 on RP14166 (rear of)
No.68 Raised mound/track, avenue of trees, timber jetty
*
102 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 2 on RP155349 No.493 Low set asymmetrical timber frame c.1920 *
Cultural Heritage
40Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
103 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 164 on CP888464 School House (No.480-482)
Large bungalow style residence, asymmetrical
*
104 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 165 on CP888464 Wellington Point State School (No.452-478)
High set timber frame school *
105 Main Road, Wellington Point
Lot 184&185 on RP14168
411 Fibro clad, curved timber parapet decoration *
107 Hardy Rd, Wellington Point
Lot 40 on RP826131
No.23-31 Residential house and outbuildings
109 Haig Road, Birkdale Lot 2 on RP65950 12-26 Small fruit shed, corrugated iron cladding *
110 Birkdale Road, Birkdale Lot 130 on SL319 School of Arts Hall (No.101)
c.1930s high set double gable, later addition *
112 Napier Street, Birkdale Lot 7 on RP212486, Lot 1 on RP102436
No.1 c.1910-20 steep pitched gable roof church *
113 Napier Street, Birkdale Lot 2 on RP203935 No.26-36 High set Queensland Bungalow, Art Deco brackets
*
114 Thorne Road, Birkdale Lot 1 on B4271 No.33 St Georges Anglican Church, low set brick church c.1934
*
115 Mooroondu Road, Thorneside
Lot 148 on RP14120 Thorneside Hall (No.200-204)
Large low set double gable c 1930-40s, later extension
*
116 Mooroondu Road, Thorneside
Lot 271 and 272
on RP229939
No.168 c.1920s workers dwelling *
118 John Street, Thorneside Lot 1 on RP22130 No.15 Qld Bungalow style, c.1910-20s *
119 Lucy Street, Thorneside Lot 179 and 180
on RP14125
No.6 Austerity style, c.1940s house, skillion roof *
120 Mooroondu Road, Thorneside
Lot 1&2 on RP64883 &
Lot 6 on RP14127
No.100, 104 & 111 Thorneside Family Store, four separate post war shops
*
122 Roger Street, Birkdale Lot 1 on RP143286 No.27 Low set, exposed timber frame, cross bracing *
124 Old Cleveland Road East, Capalaba
Lot 2 on RP211270 No.302 “The Pines” Former Willards Farm, rural/farming estate *
125 Old Cleveland Road East, Birkdale
Lot 2 on RP14144 340-352 Communications building *
126 Birkdale Road, Birkdale Lot 29 on RP14134 No.50-60 Somersby Grange
Large two storey villa, landscaped gardens *
127 Jennifer Street, Birkdale Lot 1 on RP801815 No.9 Valentine House High set Qld Bungalow style *
128 Old Cleveland Road East, Birkdale
Lot 10 on RP815821
No.509 c.1930s low set textured concrete block house
*
Cultural Heritage
41Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
129 Beckwith Street, Ormiston
Lot 8 on RP89452 No.1-13 “Lausanne” Complex of single storey masonry buildings, landscaped gardens
*
130 Eckersley Street, Ormiston
Lot 1 on RP1706 No.2-16 Bungalow style residence *
131 Empire Vista, Ormiston Lot 999 on RP863217 Empire Point
No.11-13
Remnants of timber jetty, extensive trees *
132 Hilliards Creek (Hilliards Road)
Lot 7 on RP807476 Fellmongers Bridge
No.56
Ormiston, remnants of timber bridge *
133 Wellington Street, Ormiston
Lot 2 on RP176653
Lot 3 on RP156847
Ormiston House (No.277-295)
Residential estate, listed - National Trust * *
135 Redland Bay Road, Thornlands
Lot 14 on RP869105 No.278-294 Symmetrical bungalow style farm house *
136 School Road, Victoria Point
Lot 2 on RP54014 No.18 Double gable hipped roof, projecting gable dwelling
*
137 Colburn Avenue, Victoria Point
Lot 2 on RP138886 No.257 Californian bungalow style residence, c.1920-30
*
138 Point O’Halloran Road, Victoria Point
Lot 1 on RP14821 No.11 “Monkani” Girl Guide Hall, timber frame gable roof *
139 Cartwright Street, Victoria Point
Lot 26 on RP800061 No.6 Slab on ground, single storey masonry dwelling
*
140 Colburn Avenue, Victoria Point
Lot 1 on RP216885 No.55 “The Point” High set symmetrical pyramid roof *
143 Colburn Avenue, Victoria Point
Lot 2 on RP216885 Foreshore (No.59) Double gable residence *
144 Wilson Street, Victoria Point
Lot 7 on RP102509 No.5 Complex timber frame residence *
146 Base Street, Victoria Point
Lot 45 on RP80210 No.22 c. 1050-60 painted concrete block plinth, fibro sheet
*
149 Esplanade, Redland Bay
Lot 2 on RP85303 No.45-49 c.1930-40s residence, linear form *
150 Gray Street, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP185554 No.21 “Drifting” Double gable dwelling c.1940 *
151 Broadwater Terrace, Redland Bay
Lot 316 on RP90932 No.43-49 Brick built dwelling tiled roof c.1930-40 *
152 Esplanade, Redland Bay
Lot 1 and 2 on SL979, Lot 3 on RP30542
No.111 Symmetrical timber framed dwelling *
153 Esplanade, Redland Bay
Lot 63-68 on RP30542 No.161-165 Redland Bay Hotel *
154 Banana Street, Redland Bay
Lot 167 on CP884275 Foreshore (No.46-72) Roll of Honour *
Cultural Heritage
42Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
156 Moores Road, RedlandBay
Foreshore (across from Lot 21 on RP46884)
Swimming Enclosure *
157 Esplanade, Redland Bay
Lot 20 on RP46884 No.333 c.1920-30 Workers dwelling, Californian Bungalow style
*
158 Moores Road, Redland Bay
Road Reserve Trees opposite Lot 21 on RP46884)
Moreton Bay Figs *
159 Gordon Road, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP30550 & Lot 1 on RP30547
Church (No.228-234) Low set timber frame church *
161 Entrance off Weinam Street, Redland Bay
Lot 3 on RP90361, Lot 11 on SL1595, Lot 2 on RP48270, Lot 16&17 on RP30555, Lot 2 on RP95747
U.Q. Redland Bay Farm
No.35
*
162 Queen Street, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP92475 No.42-46 Large hipped roof, stone walls to lower level *
163 Collins Street, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP48961 No.1-5 Cropped pyramid roof, exposed timber framing
*
164 School of Arts Road, Redland Bay
Road Reserve (near Lot 2 on RP93799)
Beautiful landscape vistas *
165 McWilliam Street Redland Bay
Lot 53 on RP117618 Talburpin Point Park
No.29-31
*
166 Serpentine Creek Road,Redland Bay
Lot 260 on SL11166 Cemetery (No.398-408) Graves of many pioneering residents *
167 Mt Cotton Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 1 on SL4514 Cockerel Chicken Farm (No.1483-1489)
Cropped pyramid roof residence c.1920-30 *
168 Mt Cotton Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 1 on RP69724 St Paul’s Lutheran Church (No.1257-1259)
Timber frame unusual form church *
169 1249-1251 Mount Cotton Road, Mount Cotton
Lot 1 on RP48370 Mt Cotton Hall Large timber frame rural public hall *
170 Girl Guides Reserve (German Church Road),Redland Bay
Lot 13 on RP203709 Kindilan Chapel (No.653-759)
Open air chapel *
171 Mt Cotton Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 436 on SL8006 Mt Cotton School (No.1246-1264)
Low set timber frame school building *
172 German Church Road, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP153383 No.894-906 Hipped roof dwelling, projecting gable *
173 Seaview Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 1 on RP53986 Heinemann Residence No.22-42
High set timber frame villa *
174 Wrights Place, Mt Cotton
Lot 3 on SP120562
House No.57 Rural setting complex of timber structures *
Cultural Heritage
43Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Local
Significance
State
Significance
175 Hillview Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 2 on RP30611 No.70-96 Pyramid roof workers dwelling *
176 Mount View Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 3 on RP179311 No.149-169 c.1920 high set timber frame dwelling *
177 Mount View Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 2 on RP46614 House No.130 c.1900 steep pitched gable roof *
178 Mount View Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 2 on RP149691 No.91-107 Symmetrical hipped roof workers cottage *
179 Mount View Road, Mt Cotton
Lot 3 on RP149691 No.81-89 Timber framed dwellings *
181 Queen Street, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on SP127719
No.35-49 Substantial English revival style dwelling * *
182 Esplanade, Redland Bay
Lot 1 on RP90798 No.161-165 c.1960 ‘V-shaped’ house *
183 Gordon Road, Redland Bay
Lot 434 on SL8044 Redland Bay School (No.125-141)
Raised timber frame school building * *
184 Shore Street East, Cleveland
Lot 14-15
on C14563
No.71-73, ‘Fernleigh” Low set timber frame residence on timber stumps
* *
Southern Moreton Bay Islands
According to the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study the Southern Bay Islands have a rich history of European settlement. The islands were first settled in the 1860’s with a number of buildings and sites remaining as a ‘’legacy to the past activities on the islands".
Those places that are recognised by this study and also are included in the Temporary Local Planning Instrument – Cultural Heritage Significance of Redland Shire are shown in the schedule below. These have been mapped as part of the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Planning Study . It should be noted that Council is currently undertaking an audit of this list and as such it must be considered an Interim Register of Heritage Places.
Cultural Heritage
44Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Schedule of European Heritage Places on the Southern Moreton Bay Islands (As At 27.08.01)
REF.
NO.
STREET NAME REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NO./NAME
(site name)
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
(site type)
HERITAGESIGNIFICANCE
STATELISTED
Russell Island
185 84 Cavendish Street Lot 27 RP135118 ‘Weary’ Willes House Dwelling (1890s) 1,3,4
186 33 Mark Road Lot 1 on RP 127753 Phyllis Jackson’s House Dwelling (1920s) 1
187 Cnr Jackson Road/Esplanade Jackson’s Oval ‘Jacksonville’ Wharf Precinct (1920s) 1,3,4,5
188 38-64 High Street Lot 42 SL7635 Russell Island State School
Education (1915) 1,3,4
189 25-27 High Street Lot 1 on RP31200 St Peter’s Parish Hall Religion (1920s) 1
190 48 Canaipa Ridge Road Lot 330 RP 122874 Mrs Fischer’s Grave Grave (1906) -
Maclaey Island
191 3-5 Cliff Terrace Lot 279 RP31201 Campbell’s Sa ltworks* Agriculture/ Industry (1866)
1,2,3,4,5 *
192 36 Russell Terrace Lot 252 RP31201 Shaw’s House Dwelling (1890s) 1
193 8 Pandora Court Lot 61 RP111530 Lovell’s House Dwelling
(1900-1920)
1,2,5
194 40 Brighton Road Lot 33 RP105772 McCaskell’s House Dwelling (1930s) 1
195 10 Cowes Street Lot 115 RP31201 ‘Eastbourne’ Dwelling
(1920-30s)
1,4,5
196 128 Western Road Lot 19 RP117694 Arboretum Agriculture (1890) 1,2,3
197 57-59 Charles Terrace Lot 188 RP 133301 Tim Shea’s Waterhole Public utility (1865) 1,2,3
198 1 Eastbourne Terrace Lot 76 RP31201 Roger’s Well Public utility (1820s) 1
Lamb Island
199 125-133 Lucas Drive Lot 15 RP31222 Pioneer Hall* Community Hall (1924)
1,3,4,5 *
200 Road Reserve at end of Lucas Drive
Near lot 1 on RP121713 Jetty Shed Maritime transport (1939)
1,3,4,5
201 At the end of Lucas Drive Near lot 1 on RP119744 Thomas Lucas’ Grave Convict grave (1834) 1,4,5
202 24 Tina Avenue Lot 60-61 RP127423 Eric Noyes Farmhouse Dwelling (1911) 1
203 8 Brook Haven Lot 76 RP907133 Brooke’s Packing Shed Agriculture (1920) 1,4
Karragarra Island
204 14 The Esplanade Lot 14 RP118274 Noyes Farmhouse Dwelling (1900) 1,4,5
*Entered on the Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992. Restrictions may apply.
Cultural Heritage
45Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Classification for heritage significance –
1. Historic value;
2. Aesthetic (landscape and architectural);
3. Scientific
4. Representative value;
Integrity
Cultural Heritage
46Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Appendix 2 – Inventory of Places – Local Heritage Site List Significance Ratings and Management Categories of Known Indigenous Cultural Heritage Sites and Places
Site Name Site Type Management Category
Russel Island
Giant’s Cave 1 1
Brown’s Bay middens 1-2 1-2
Turtle Swamo midden 4 1-2
Kibbinkibbinwa Point 1 1
Oyster Point 1 1-2
Bora grounds (E and SE of Island) 1 1-2
Rocky Point middens 1 1-2
Swamps, Lagoons and other coastal resource areas 1 1-2
Other likely middens 3-4 1-4
Story places (eastern end of Maclaey Island, north of Perpula Bay) 1 1-4
Macleay Island
Corroboree Point 1 1
Point Perrebinpa to Point Pininpinin 1 3
Midden and burial (Perulpa Point) 1 2
Reburial location (Perulpa Point) 1 1
Coondooroopa 1 1-4
Tim Shea’s Waterhole midden site 4 1
Thompson’s Point 4 4
Cow Bay 1 1
Swamps, lagoons and coastal resource area 1 1-2
Other likely midden sites 3-4 1-4
Story places (eastern end of Macleay Island, north of Perulpa Bay) 1 1-4
Lamb Island
Clarke’s Point to Lamb Island 2-3 1-3
Pebble Beach 1-4 1-3
Jeff Ward’s midden (SW of Island Is.) 1 3-4
Ian Ward’s Park Road Reserve and Welers Bush Care midden 4 3-4
Thomas Lucas Waterhole midden 4 3-4
Swamps, lagoons and other coastal resource areas – including waterholes 1 1-2
Cultural Heritage
47Cultural Heritage Final 14-05-02 16/05/02
Site Name Site Type Management Category
Other likely middens 3-4 1-4
Story places (central eastern side of Lamb Island) 1 1-4
Karragarra Island
Possible shell midden (east end of Island) 1-2 1
Midden (west end Island) 1-2 1-2
Swamps, lagoons and other coastal resource areas 1 1-2
Other likely middens 3-4 1-4
Story places (western end of Karragarra Island) 1 1-4
1:15
0000
1000
010
0020
0030
00M
eter
s
j:\ar
cinf
o\w
ork\
dpe0
19\IP
AT
own
Pla
n\po
sitio
npa
pers
.apr
AH
C S
ITE
S
Pro
duce
dby
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent
RE
DLA
ND
SH
IRE
CO
UN
CIL
N
09/0
1/20
02M
ap 3
.1.1
Pla
nnin
gS
chem
eM
appi
ngC
ultu
ralH
erita
geP
ositi
onP
aper
Red
land
Shi
reC
ounc
il
RegisterofNationalEstateSites
Legend Lo
calA
utho
ritie
sou
tsid
eR
SC
Rcl
ine
Maj
road
Sub
urbs
Out
line
ofR
SC
AH
CA
reas
WA
HC
Bui
ldin
gs
CLE
VE
LAN
D
OR
MIS
TO
N
TH
OR
NE
SID
E
WE
LLIN
GT
ON
PT
ALE
XA
ND
RA
HIL
LS
BIR
KD
ALE
CA
PA
LAB
A
TH
OR
NLA
ND
S VIC
TO
RIA
PT
SH
ELD
ON
RE
DLA
ND
BA
Y
MT
CO
TT
ON
WW
W W
Cle
vela
ndH
otel
(for
mer
)
Cle
vela
ndLi
ghtH
ouse
Orm
isto
nH
ouse
StA
ndre
ws
Chu
rch
ofE
ngla
nd
Kin
gIs
land
Env
ironm
enta
lPar
k
BR
ISB
AN
EC
ITY
CO
UN
CIL
GO
LDC
OA
ST
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
LOG
AN
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
1:10
0000
800
080
016
0024
00M
eter
s
ST
RA
DB
RO
KE
IS
PT
LOO
KO
UT
AM
ITY
PT
DU
NW
ICH
MA
CLE
AY
ISLA
MB
IS
KA
RR
AG
AR
RA
IS
MA
CLE
AY
IS
RU
SS
ELL
IS
W W WD
unw
ich
Cem
eter
y
Dun
wic
hP
ublic
Hal
lC
onvi
ctS
tore
Site
Com
plex
Pee
lIsl
and
Myo
raE
nviro
nmen
talP
ark
Goa
tIsl
and
Env
ironm
enta
lPar
k
Bird
Isla
ndE
nviro
nmen
talP
ark
Blu
eLa
keN
atio
nalP
ark
NO
TE
: S
ever
alsi
tes
coul
dno
tbe
incl
uded
inth
eda
igra
mdu
eto
thei
rge
ogra
phic
alna
ture
orun
know
nlo
catio
n. T
hese
site
sin
clud
e-
1. I
ndig
enou
sP
lace
,Dun
wic
h(R
egis
tere
d)2.
Ind
igen
ous
Pla
ce,C
leve
land
(Reg
iste
red)
3. I
ndig
enou
sP
lace
,Dun
wic
h(R
egis
tere
d)4.
Ind
igen
ous
Pla
ce,P
oint
Look
out(
Reg
iste
red)
5. I
ndig
enou
sP
lace
,Dun
wic
h(R
egis
tere
d)6.
Ind
igen
ous
Pla
ce,D
unw
ich
(Reg
iste
red)
7. I
ndig
enou
sP
lace
,Dun
wic
h(R
egis
tere
d)8.
Ind
igen
ous
Pla
ce,D
unw
ich
(Reg
iste
red)
9. N
orth
Str
adbr
oke
Isla
nd(M
yora
sect
ion)
,(I
nter
imLi
st)
10.
Nor
thS
trad
brok
eIs
land
(cen
tral
sect
ion)
,(R
egis
tere
d)11
. N
orth
Str
adbr
oke
Isla
nd(n
orth
ern
sect
ion)
,(I
nter
imLi
st)
12.
Nor
thS
trad
brok
eIs
land
(sou
ther
nse
ctio
n),
(Reg
iste
red)
13.
Nor
thS
trad
brok
eIs
land
,Dun
wic
h(R
ejec
ted
Pla
ce)
14.
Rem
nant
Koa
laH
abita
t,W
estM
ount
Cot
ton
Roa
d(I
ndic
ativ
eP
lace
)15
. S
outh
ern
&E
aste
rnM
oret
onB
ay(R
egis
tere
d)
Legend Q
uand
amoo
kaC
laim
#2(Q
C99
/25)
Qua
ndam
ooka
Cla
im#1
(QC
95/2
)
Loca
lAut
horit
ies
outs
ide
RS
C
Roa
dC
entr
eLi
nes
Mai
nR
oad
Net
wor
k
Sub
urbs
Out
line
ofR
SC
NativeTitleClaims
QUANDAMOOKA
Red
land
Shi
reC
ounc
il
Pla
nnin
gS
chem
eM
appi
ngC
ultu
ralH
erita
geP
ositi
onP
aper
09/0
1/20
02M
ap3.
1.3a
N
Pro
duce
dby
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent
RE
DLA
ND
SH
IRE
CO
UN
CIL
j:\ar
cinf
o\w
ork\
dpe0
19\IP
AT
own
Pla
n\po
sitio
npa
pers
.apr
NA
TIV
ETI
TLE
CLE
VE
LAN
D
OR
MIS
TO
N
TH
OR
NE
SID
E
WE
LLIN
GT
ON
PT
ALE
XA
ND
RA
HIL
LS
BIR
KD
ALE
CA
PA
LAB
A
TH
OR
NLA
ND
S VIC
TO
RIA
PT
SH
ELD
ON
RE
DLA
ND
BA
Y
MT
CO
TT
ON
ST
RA
DB
RO
KE
IS
PT
LOO
KO
UT
AM
ITY
PT
DU
NW
ICH
MA
CLE
AY
ISLA
MB
IS
KA
RR
AG
AR
RA
IS
MA
CLE
AY
IS
RU
SS
ELL
IS
1000
010
0020
0030
00M
eter
s
1:15
0000
1:10
0000
750
075
015
0022
50M
eter
s
LOG
AN
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
GO
LDC
OA
ST
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
BR
ISB
AN
EC
ITY
CO
UN
CIL
j:\ar
cinf
o\w
ork\
dpe0
19\IP
AT
own
Pla
n\po
sitio
npa
pers
.apr
NA
TIV
ETI
TLE
Pro
duce
dby
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent
RE
DLA
ND
SH
IRE
CO
UN
CIL
N
09/0
1/20
02M
ap3.
1.3b
Pla
nnin
gS
chem
eM
appi
ngC
ultu
ralH
erita
geP
ositi
onP
aper
Red
land
Shi
reC
ounc
il
NativeTitleClaims
TURBALL
Legend Lo
calA
utho
ritie
sou
tsid
eR
SC
Out
line
ofR
SC
Tur
rbal
Cla
im(Q
C98
/26)
Mai
nR
oad
Net
wor
kS
ubur
bs
Roa
dC
entr
elin
es
CO
OC
HIE
MU
DLO
IS
CLE
VE
LAN
D
OR
MIS
TO
N
MA
CLE
AY
ISLA
MB
IS
KA
RR
AG
AR
RA
IS
MA
CLE
AY
IS
PA
NN
IKIN
IS
TH
OR
NE
SID
E
WE
LLIN
GT
ON
PT
ALE
XA
ND
RA
HIL
LS
BIR
KD
ALE
CA
PA
LAB
A
TH
OR
NLA
ND
S VIC
TO
RIA
PT
SH
ELD
ON
RE
DLA
ND
BA
Y
MT
CO
TT
ON
RU
SS
ELL
IS
BR
ISB
AN
EC
ITY
CO
UN
CIL
LOG
AN
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
GO
LDC
OA
ST
CIT
YC
OU
NC
IL
1000
010
0020
0030
0040
00M
eter
s
1:10
0000
The
clai
mar
eaill
ustr
ated
onth
ism
apre
pres
ents
the
area
ofR
edla
ndS
hire
incl
uded
with
inth
ebo
unda
ryof
the
Turr
baln
ativ
etit
lecl
aim
. O
nly
spec
ific
tenu
rety
pes
with
inth
iscl
aim
boun
dary
are
subj
ectt
ona
tive
title
clai
m,w
ithal
lpriv
ate
free
hold
land
auto
mat
ical
lyex
clud
ed.
IndigenousCulturalHeritageSites
SouthernMoretonBayIslands
Red
land
Shi
reC
ounc
il
Pla
nnin
gS
chem
eM
appi
ngC
ultu
ralH
erita
geP
ositi
onP
aper
09/0
1/20
02M
ap3.
4.4
N
Pro
duce
dby
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent
RE
DLA
ND
SH
IRE
CO
UN
CIL
j:\ar
cinf
o\w
ork\
dpe0
19\IP
AT
own
Pla
n\po
sitio
npa
pers
.apr
CU
LTU
RA
LH
ER
ITA
GE
-S
MB
I
Thes
e im
ages
have
bee
n ta
ken
from
the
Pla
nnin
gR
epor
t -S
outh
ern
Mor
eton
Bay
Isla
nds
Pla
nnin
g S
trat
egy,
com
plet
edin
Janu
ary
in19
99by
Gut
terid
ge, H
aski
ns &
Dav
ey.