CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX B

CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

18 Technology Dr. Ste. 103

Irvine, CA 92618

949-303-0420

www.dukecrm.com

Archaeology History Paleontology

October 3, 2019 Collette L. Morse Morse Planning Group 145 North C Street Tustin, California 92780 Subject: Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment, 33-Unit Residential Condominium

Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road Project, Fullerton, Orange County, California Dear Ms. Morse: At the request of the Morse Planning Group (Client), Duke Cultural Resources Management, LLC (DUKE C R M ) has conducted a cultural and paleontological resources record search and pedestrian field survey for the 33-Unit Residential Condominium Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road (Project), located in the City of Fullerton, Orange County, California. The Project is approximately 2.9 acres and consists of Assessor Parcel number 293-241-07, located within the northern area of the City of Fullerton; north of East Bastanchury Road, west of Puente Street, south of Beechwood Elementary School, and east of Loma Vista Memorial Park. The Project is located within the northern foothills of East Coyote Hills and is located a quarter-mile south of Brea Creek. A small, unnamed ephemeral stream intersects the center of the Project from north to south. Specifically, The Project lies in Township 3 South, Range 10 West, in the NE ¼ of Section 22, and is depicted on the USGS La Habra, California 7.5-minute quadrangle. All project maps are located in Attachment A.

The proposed Project involves the construction of 33 multi-family residential units (townhomes) on 104,544 square feet of the Project site. The Project is located on uneven terrain and Project plans require an average 8 feet in depth of mass grading (Alta 2019) and the import of 14,000 cubic yards of fill material to support the proposed Project. Natural Setting California is divided into 11 geomorphic provinces, each naturally defined by unique geologic and geomorphic characteristics. The Project is located in the northwest portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province. It is located at the northeastern edge of the Los Angeles Basin, an actively subsiding basin bound by the Santa Monica and San Gabriel Mountains to the north, the Santa Ana Mountains to the east, and the Palos Verdes Hills to the south (Yerkes, et al. 1965). The rapid deposition of and resulting deep sediment fill in the Los Angeles Basin (Yerkes et al. 1965; Yeats 1978) has resulted in the accumulation of notable petroleum resources (Bilodeau, et al. 2007) and fossil resources (Miller 1971). Locally, the Project is adjacent to the Whittier Fault, a branch of the Elsinore Fault Zone that has produced uplift in the form of the Puente Hills half-graben, a geologic feature which defines a portion of the northeastern edge of the Los Angeles Basin (Bjorklund et al. 2002; Bjorklund 2003). Beginning approximately 14 million years ago, the activation of the Whittier Fault produced 14,000 feet of vertical uplift on the northern side of the fault (Bjorklund et al. 2002; Bjorklund, 2003), resulting in sediment being shed to the south in broad alluvial fans in the Pleistocene Epoch (2.6 million years ago to 11,700 years ago), which were later dissected by Holocene fluvial channels (Dibblee and Ehrenspeck 2001). The sediments in the Project area record Pleistocene alluvial fan deposition from the eroded material sourced from the Puente Hills to the north, which have been uplifted by the Coyote Hills Uplift, a prominent anticline which has exposed Pleistocene-age sediment and is responsible for local oil deposits (Durham and Yerkes 1964). Additionally, the Project area is mapped as Alo series soil which is a silty clay that forms from shale or sandstone (NRCS 2019).

DUKE Cultural Resources Management

10/3/2019 (S:\Projects\C-0303 Brandywine Residential\Report\Brandywine Report 10.3.19.docx) 2

Project Area History The Project is located within the traditional boundaries of the Gabrielino/Tongva Indians. Historically, tribal boundaries were not established definitively and were considered fluid, due to either sociopolitical features or a lack of reliable data (Bean and Smith 1978). Generally, their territory included all the Los Angeles Basin, parts of the Santa Ana and Santa Monica Mountains, along the coast from Aliso Creek in the south, to Topanga Canyon in the north, and San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Catalina Islands. The Gabrielino spoke a dialect of the Cupan group of the Takic language family. This language was part of the larger Uto-Aztecan language stock which migrated west from the Great Basin (Bean and Smith 1978; Shipley 1978). Groups of Gabrielino lived in villages that were autonomous from other villages. Each village had access to hunting, collecting, and fishing areas (Bean and Smith 1978). Villages were typically located in protected coves or canyons near water. The closest historically recorded village, Hotuuknga is located 5.5 miles to the south near present-day Anaheim (McCawley 1996). The Project lies on the former Mexican Grant, Rancho San Juan de Santa Ana, originally granted to Juan Pacifico Ontiveros in 1837. Unlike most Spanish and Mexican grants, Ontiveros’ 35,970-acre land claim was upheld in United States Courts following the Mexican-American War (Robinson 1950). Ontiveros sold a portion of his land to Able Stearns in 1863, who in turn sold a portion of his acquisition to a Basque shepherd named Domingo Bastanchury (Brigandi 2019). Bastanchury had come to California via ship, sailing around Cape Horn in 1860. Following several years of working as a sheep herder, he began to acquire his own land. His land holding at one time, was reported to have been between 20,000 acres that supported 15,000-, 20,000 head of sheep (Douglas and Bilboa 2005). During the early 1900s, Bastanchury capitalized on the citrus boom that spread through southern California, planting 3,000 acres of oranges on his land (Douglas and Bilboa 2005) although other crops such as black eyed peas, lima beans, tomatoes, and walnut trees were grown on his land holdings (Arellano 2013). Later, Bastunchury was swept up in the oil exploration frenzy that spread through southern California in which he was deceived in selling part of his land holdings to the Murphy Oil Company. The Bastanchury family successfully sued the Murphy Oil Company, and according to the settlement, the Bastanchury ranch was worth $15,000,000 dollars and included 5,000 acres of citrus groves in 1923 (Douglas and Bilboa 2005). The Bastanchury estate was such an economic force in the area, that the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe railroads-built spurs near the Bastanchury packing house and later, the Pacific Electric Railway maintained two stations within the Bastanchury land limits (Arelleno 2013). To support the expansive agricultural enterprise, Bastanchury sponsored hundreds of Mexican immigrants in grower-sponsored worker camps that popped up in the southern California citrus belt. The United States census reported 411 Mexican immigrants living on the Bastanchury Ranch in 1930, who were split up into six colonias (Arelleno 2013). During the peak of the great Depression in the 1930s, the Bastanchurys announced they were 2,000,000 dollars in debt as the soil on the Ranch was not conducive to long-term, large scale agriculture. Without the sponsorship of the Bastanchurys, the residents of its six colonias were rounded up and deported by United Stated officials; one of the largest mass deportations in Orange County’s history (Arelleno 2013). The Bastanchury Ranch was later renamed and reorganized into the Sunny Hills Ranch, turning its interests to real estate. Records Searches Paleontological Resources On September 6, 2019, the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) performed a paleontological records search to locate fossil localities within, and in the vicinity of, the Project (McLeod, 2019). Mr. Scherzer also performed a search of the online University of California Museum of Paleontology collections, San Diego Natural History Museum collections, Paleobiology Database (PDBD), and FAUNMAP, and other published literature for nearby (within 3 miles) fossil localities in similar deposits. These searches produced six fossil localities:



• Emery Borrow Pit (RCIC LC 47; LACM 3536-3537, 4178, 7053-7054, and 7088-7089) produced

remains from broad-footed mole (S. latimanus), ground sloth (Megalonyx), brush rabbit (S.

bachmani), hare (Lepus), California ground squirrel (S. beecheyi), Botta’s pocket gopher (T. bottae),

new world mouse (Peromyscus), cotton rat (Sigmodon), desert woodrat (N. lepida), California vole

(M. californicus), coyote (C. latrans), gray fox (Urocyon), ringtail (B. astutus), skunk (Mephitis), lynx

(Lynx), American mastodon (M. americanum), Columbian mammoth (M. imperator), western horse

(E. occidentalis), Merriam’s tapir (T. merriami), peccary (Tayassuidae), western camel (C. hesternus),

early llama (P. mirifica), mule deer (O. hemionus), red deer (C. elaphus), pronghorn (Antilocapridae),

bovid (Bovidae), bony fish (Osteichthyes), arroyo chub (G. orcuttii), toad (B. nestor), western toad

(B. boreas), northern red-legged frog (R. aurora), tree frog (Hyla), Weigmann’s alligator lizard (G.

liocephalus), Pacific newt (Tarichia), coast horned lizard (P. coronatum), desert spiny lizard (S.

magister), western fence lizard (S. occidentalis), common side-blotched lizard (U. stansburiana),

southern alligator lizard (G. multicarinatus), desert night lizard (X. vigilis), whiptail lizard

(Cnemidophorus), western skink (E. skiltonianus), racer (Coluber), Sonoran gopher snake (P.

melanoleucus catenifer), prairie rattlesnake (C. viridis), kingsnake (L. getulus), western lyre snake (T.

biscutatus), night snake (H. torquata), red-eared slider (P. scripta), western pond turtle (C. marmorata),

Law’s diving goose (C. lawi), grebe (Podiceps), pied-billed grebe (Podylimbus), American white

pelican (P. erythrorhynchus), cormorant (Phalacrocorax), Canada goose (B. canadensis), white goose

(Chen), northern pintail (A. acuta), mallard (A. platyrhynchos), gadwall (A. strepera), Eurasian teal (A.

crecca), northern shoveler (A. clypeata), lesser scaup (Aythya affinis), goldeneye (Bucephala), ruddy

duck (O. jamaicensis), great blue heron (A. Herodias), turkey vulture (C. aura), sharp-shinned hawk

(A. striatus), red-tailed hawk (B. jamaicensis), falcon (Falco), Southern crested caracara (P. plancus),

California quail (C. californicus), crane (Grus), turkey (Meleagris), American coot (F. Americana),

moorhen (Gallinula), rail (Rallus), killdeer (C. vociferous), band-tailed pigeon (C. fasciata), and barn

owl (T. alba), from 3 miles south of the Project at an unspecified depth (Jefferson, 1991a,b).

• LACM 1052 produced remains of American mastodon (M. americanum), horse (Equus), western

camel (Camelops), deer (Odocoileus), pronghorn (Antilocapra), and California turkey (M. californica)

from 3 miles northwest of the Project at an unspecified depth (Jefferson, 1991a,b);

• LACM 3861 produced remains of Law’s diving goose (Chendytes) from 3 miles northwest of the

Project at an unspecified depth (Jefferson, 1991a);

• LACM 6472 produced remains of horse (Equus) from 1.5 miles east of the Project at an

unspecified depth (Jefferson, 1991b; McLeod, 2019);

• LACM 3524 produced remains of hooved mammal (ungulate) from 2 miles southwest of the

Project at an unspecified depth;

• LACM 6210 and LACM 6211 produced remains from crusteaceans, bivalves, gastropods,

scaphopods, and echinoderms, from 3 miles northwest of the Project at an unspecified depth

(PBDB)

Due to the fossiliferous nature of the very old alluvial fan deposits (Qvofsa), they are assigned a high

paleontological potential, a finding that is consistent with the City of Fullerton’s General Plan Environmental

Impact Report (2012).

Cultural Resources On August 27, 2019 DUKE CRM archaeologist Megan Wilson, M.A., R.P.A, conducted a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). The SCCIC is part of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and is located at California State University, Fullerton. The records



search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a one-mile radius of the Project, as well as a review of known cultural resource survey and excavation reports. In addition, Ms. Wilson examined the California State Historic Property Data File (HPD), which includes the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI). Results of the records search indicated that no previous cultural resources studies have included the current Project. However, there have been 18 cultural resources studies conducted within a one-mile radius of the Project. Roughly 25 percent of the one-mile radius surrounding the Project has been surveyed for cultural resources.

The results of this search indicate that there are no cultural resources recorded within the Project. However, there are three cultural resources recorded within a one-mile radius of the Project. These resources, summarized below in Table 1, include two historic archaeological sites and one historic built-environment resource. Table 2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within a One-Mile Radius

Primary No.

Trinomial Resource Type Description Year(s) Recorded

Distance (miles)/Direction from Project

30-001221

CA-ORA-1221

Historic Archaeological Site

Concrete house foundation 1989 0.5-1/SW

30-001489

CA-ORA-1489H

Historic Archaeological Site

Historic refuse scatter 1996 0.25-0.5/SE

30-176753

- Historic Resource Hospital, International Style, "St. Jude Medical Center": 1956

2004 0.5-1/SE

Ms. Wilson conducted a review of on-line historical topographic maps and aerial photographs. The earliest USGS Topographic map is the 1895 Anaheim, Calif. 15’ map and shows no development in the current Project area; however, Brea Boulevard is present to the east and Harbor Boulevard is present to the west. The 1935 Coyote Hills, Calif. 7.5’ map shows an unnamed drainage to the immediate south of the Project area and the Loma Vista Cemetery to the northeast of the Project area. The 1942 Anaheim, Calif. 15’ map depicts the Project area as an agricultural area. The 1964 La Habra, Calif. 7.5’ map depicts an oil well and associated road within the Project area (USGS 2019). The earliest historic aerial dates to 1928 and shows the Project area used as an orchard, composed of young (likely citrus) trees. The subsequent 1934 historic aerial depicts a mature orchard on the Project area as well as a structure, possibly a farmhouse on the center of the western boundary of the Project area. This structure appears on the subsequent 1940 historic aerial. The 1963 historic aerial shows that the former structure and associated orchard have been removed. Bastanchury Road is present to the immediate south of the Project area, and the eastern boundary of the Project area has been graded. The 1972 historic aerial shows an oil well in the center of the Project area with a row of trees on the well’s western boundary (NETR 2019). The oil well was formally “Toussau 11”, originally dug in 1956 for the Union Oil Company in their East Coyote Oil Field. The well was originally 6,411 feet deep. The “Toussau 11” well was successfully abandoned and plugged in 1994 (DOGGR 1994). Field Survey On August 27, 2019 a pedestrian field survey of the Project area was conducted by Ms. Wilson. Ground surface visibility was poor throughout the site, averaging 20% visibility due to dense, dry, and matted invasive grasses (Figure 1). A row of ornamental Prickly Pear cactus and Cypress trees was present along the east boundary of the Project area and unidentified ornamental trees were present along the west Project boundary in the vicinity



Figure 1. Center of the Project, view east (note elevation change)

Figure 2. Overview of Project area, view northwest

Figure 3. Sediments from center of Project, plan view

Figure 4. Culvert under Bastanchury Road, view

south.

Figure 5. Culvert under Beechwood Elementary, view north

Figure 6. Example of trace remnant of oil well, view north



of the former historic structure, but are more likely related to the adjacent Loma Vista Memorial Park located to the west (Figure 2). Sediments were unconsolidated silts, light brown in color (Figure 3). The Project area terrain was uneven; the Project area slopes inward in the center due to a natural drainage basin. A discontinuous, corrugated metal and concrete culvert was located on the center-south (Figure 4) and center-north boundaries of the Project area (Figure 5). Special attention was given to the location of the former historic structure along the west boundary and to the former location an oil well. No remnant of the historic structure was observed. Trace remains of the former oil well, “Toussau 11” were observed in the center of the Project and included concrete rubble, brick fragments, metal and pipes and scraps (Figure 6). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section addresses the Project’s potential to impact cultural and paleontological resources. Impacts to cultural resources are generally considered to be direct (e.g. destruction or demolition of a resource) or indirect (e.g. visual, audible, or cumulative changes to the setting). Under CEQA, cultural resources are evaluated for significance and eligibility for the CRHR. If a resource is considered eligible for the CRHR, it is considered a historical resource under CEQA. For the purposes of CEQA, impacts are only considered significant for historical resources.

There is a high sensitivity for paleontological resources in the deposits that underlie the Project. Therefore, significant and unique paleontological resources may be impacted by the Project during earth disturbing activities related to the Project. These impacts would be considered potentially significant. In order to reduce the potential for impacts to paleontological resources to a level that is less than significant under CEQA, paleontological monitoring is recommended during ground disturbance associated with the Project. Paleontological Monitoring - A paleontological monitor shall be present to observe ground disturbing activities within the Project. The paleontological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a qualified paleontologist (B.S. /B.A. in geology, or related discipline with an emphasis in paleontology and demonstrated experience and competence in paleontological research, fieldwork, reporting, and curation).

1. The qualified paleontologist shall be on-site at the pre-construction meeting to discuss monitoring protocols.

2. Paleontological monitoring shall start at full-time. If no paleontological resources are discovered after half of the ground disturbance has occurred, monitoring can be reduced to part-time or spot-checking, at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist.

3. The paleontological monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or redirect grading efforts if paleontological resources are discovered.

4. In the event of a paleontological discovery the paleontological monitor shall flag the area and notify the construction crew immediately. No further disturbance in the flagged area shall occur until the qualified paleontologist has cleared the area.

5. In consultation with the qualified paleontologist, the paleontological monitor shall quickly assess the nature and significance of the find. If the specimen is not significant it shall be quickly removed and the area cleared.

6. If the discovery is significant the qualified paleontologist shall notify the developer and City of Fullerton immediately.

7. In consultation with the developer and the City of Fullerton, the qualified paleontologist shall develop a plan of mitigation which will likely include salvage excavation and removal of the find, removal of sediment from around the specimen (in the laboratory), research to identify and categorize the find, curation of the find in a local qualified repository, and preparation of a report summarizing the find.



Sensitivity for prehistoric archaeological resources in the Project is considered low due to the prior ground disturbances from agricultural and oil extraction activities. The Project area is mapped as Alo series soil which is a silty clay that forms from shale or sandstone. This series typically would have low sensitivity for buried prehistoric deposits due to a lack of alluvial or fluvial deposition. However, due to the long historic land use of the Project area and the former presence of a historic structure along the western boundary of the Project area, the probability of encountering historic archaeological resources, such as historic foundations and refuse deposits, is moderate. Due to the moderate potential to impact cultural resources, DUKE CRM recommends archaeological monitoring during ground disturbances related to the Project. Archaeological Monitoring – An archaeological monitor shall be present to observe ground disturbing activities within the Project on a part-time basis. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist (M.A., R.P.A. in anthropology or archaeology).

1. The qualified archaeologist shall be on-site at the pre-construction meeting to discuss monitoring protocols.

2. Archaeological monitoring shall start at part-time. If no archaeological resources are discovered after half of the ground disturbance has occurred, monitoring can be reduced to spot-checking, at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist.

3. The archaeological monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or redirect grading efforts if archaeological resources are discovered.

4. In the event of an archaeological discovery the archaeological monitor shall flag the area and notify the construction crew immediately. No further disturbance in the flagged area shall occur until the qualified archaeologist has cleared the area.

5. In consultation with the qualified archaeologist the archaeological monitor shall quickly assess the nature and significance of the find. If the specimen is not significant it shall be quickly removed, and the area cleared.

6. If the discovery is significant the qualified archaeologist shall notify the developer and City of Fullerton immediately.

7. In consultation with the developer and City of Fullerton, the qualified archaeologist shall develop a plan of mitigation which will likely include salvage excavation and removal of the find, removal of sediment from around the specimen (in the laboratory), research to identify and categorize the find, curation of the find in a local qualified repository, and preparation of a report summarizing the find.

If archaeological and/or paleontological resources are discovered during construction, a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist shall be retained to assess the nature and significance of the discovery. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials.

Thank you for contacting DUKE C R M on this Project. If you have any questions or comments, you can contact me at (949) 356-6563, or by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,

DUKE CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, LLC



Megan Wilson, M.A., RPA Archaeologist Attachment A: Project Maps


REFERENCES Arelleno, Gustavo

2013 The Lost Mexicans of Bastanchury Ranch. OC Weekly, 11 April, Orange County. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc.

2019 Geotechnical investigation, 899 Bastanchury Road, City of Fullerton County of Orange, California: produced for Brandywine Homes, January 1. Manuscript on File at Duke CRM, Irvine CA.

Bean, Lowell J. and Charles R. Smith

1978 Gabrielino. Robert F. Heizer, vol. ed. Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California: 538-549. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Bilodeau, W.L., Bilodeau, S.W., Gath, E.M, Oborne, M., and R.J. Proctor

2007 Geology of Los Angeles, California, United States of America: Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, v. 13, no. 2, p. 99–160, DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.13.2.99

Bjorklund, T. 2003 The Whittier Fault Trend: Cross-sections, Structure Maps, and Well Tops in the Major Oil

Producing Area of the Northeastern Los Angeles Basin: AAPG Search and Discovery Article #10038. Bjorklund, T., Burke, K., Zhou, H.W., and R.S. Yeats

2002 Miocene Rifting in the Los Angeles basin: Evidence from the Puente Hills Half-graben, Volcanic Rocks, and P-wave Tomography: Geology, v. 30, no. 5, p. 451-454.

Bradshaw, Roch

1936 Fame for Immigrant Boy Started Bastanchury Ranch. Santa Ana Journal, April 23 1936. Republished by the Orange County Historical Society, Electronic document available at http://www.orangecountyhistory.org/wp/?page_id=227, last accessed August 2019.

Briagndi, Phil

2019 Drought, Debt, and Development: The Story of the Stearns Ranchos. OC Historyland. Electronic document available at https://www.ochistoryland.com/stearnsranchos, last accessed August 2019.

City of Fullerton

2012 Section 5.10. Cultural Resources. The Fullerton Plan: Environmental Impact Report. Electronic document, available at https://www.cityoffullerton.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=8935, last accessed August 2019.

Dibblee, T.W., and H. Ehrenspeck

2001 Geologic map of the Whittier and La Habra quadrangles (western Puente Hills) Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation, Dibblee Foundation Map DF-74, scale 1:24,000

Douglas, William A. and Jon Bilbao

2005 Amerikanuak: Basques in the New World. University of Nevada Press, Reno and Las Vegas, N.V. Durham, D.L, and R.F. Yerkes

1964 Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California: USGS Professional Paper: 420-B, 62 pp.

http://www.orangecountyhistory.org/wp/?page_id=227

https://www.ochistoryland.com/stearnsranchos

https://www.cityoffullerton.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=8935


DOGGR

1994 Toussau 11. Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. Resources Agency of California, Department of Conservation. Documents on file at DUKE CRM, Irvine CA

Hillhouse, J.W.

2010 Clockwise Rotation and Implications for Northward Drift of the Western Transverse Ranges from Paleomagnetism of the Piuma Member, Sespe Formation, near Malibu, California: Geochemistry

Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 11, no. 7, p. 1–27.

McCawley, William 1996 The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. A Malki Museum Press/ Ballena Press

Cooperative Publication. NETR

2017 Historic Aerials. Nationwide Environmental Title Research. Electronic document, https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer, accessed August 2019

McLeod, S.

2019 Paleontological resources for the proposed Brandywine Residential Project, in the City of Fullerton, Orange County, project area: submitted to DUKE CRM, 6 September. Morton, D.M., and F.K. Miller

2006 Geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' quadrangles, California: USGS Open-File Report 2006-1217, version 1.0

National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 2019. Official Soils Series Descriptions, ALO. Electronic document,

https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/A/ALO.html, accessed August 2019. United Stated Geologic Survey (USGS)

2019 USGS Historical Topographic Map Explorer. Electronic document, http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/, accessed August 2019.

Yerkes, R.F., and R.H. Campbell

2005 Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, southern California: United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005–1019, Version 1.0.

Yerkes, R. F.; McCulloh, T. H.; Schoellhamer, J. E.; and J.G. Vedder

1965 Geology of the Los Angeles Basin, California; an introduction: USGS Professional Paper: 420-A, 57 pp.

https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/A/ALO.html


ATTACHMENT A

PROJECT MAPS

1:15,529,340

Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap,INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),

Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community

Map 1- Project Vicinity33-Unit Residential Condominium Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road Project, C-0303

¯0 5 10

Miles

1:316,8001 inch = 5 miles

Project Area

Project Area

LAHABRA

ANAHEIM

Project AreaUSGS 7.5' Quads

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed

¯0 0.25 0.5

Miles

1:24,0001 inch = 2,000 feet

0 0.25 0.5Kilometers

Map 2- Project Location33-Unit Residential Condominium Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road Project, C-0303

Project Area

Map 3- Project Aerial

¯0 40 80Feet

1:9601 inch =80 feet

33-Unit Residential Condominium Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road Project, C-0303

Project AreaQvof: very old alluvial fan deposits

Map 3- Project Aerial

¯0 40 80Feet

1:9601 inch =80 feet

33-Unit Residential Condominium Development at 751 East Bastanchury Road Project, C-0303

CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

Documents

Transcript of CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT