cU - higp.hawaii.edu · E. SOILS The soil types ... I SOURCE: SoH Survey of the Islands of Kauai,...

164
- COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (10/99) .L1\J 2 3 2Cffi ill I I FROM:. _____ LII,LINu.:N .... E ... L _____ DATE: ________ SUSPENSE TO: _BAUER,G. _. _ J\NBARA, S. UJII, N. -" HARDY,R. tr _HIGA,D. _HIRANO,E. _ICE,C. _IMATA,R. _JINNAI,R. TO: _LUM,A. 2--NAKAMA, L. _NAKANO,D. _ NISHIOKA, L. ../-OHYE, M. _SAKODA,E. _0_ SUBIA, S. _ SWANSON, S. _UYENO,D. _YODA,K. FOR: _Approval _Signature Information PLEASE: See Me Review & Comment Take Action _Type Draft _Type Final 'Z- File Xerox _ copies _ KUNIMURA, I. / _ cU 1 i'" ",dl 1 ,,«.. ... )

Transcript of cU - higp.hawaii.edu · E. SOILS The soil types ... I SOURCE: SoH Survey of the Islands of Kauai,...

-COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (10/99)

.L1\J 2 3 2Cffi ill I I FROM:. _____ LII,LINu.:N .... E ... L _____ DATE: ________ SUSPENSE DATE_~_++__----

TO:

_BAUER,G.

~ING'F.

_. _ J\NBARA, S. UJII, N.

-" HARDY,R. tr _HIGA,D. _HIRANO,E. _ICE,C. _IMATA,R. _JINNAI,R.

TO:

_LUM,A. 2--NAKAMA, L. _NAKANO,D. _ NISHIOKA, L. ../-OHYE, M. _SAKODA,E. _0_ SUBIA, S. _ SWANSON, S. _UYENO,D. _YODA,K.

FOR:

_Approval _Signature

Information

PLEASE:

See Me Review & Comment Take Action

_Type Draft _Type Final 'Z- File

Xerox _ copies

_ KUNIMURA, I. /

_ cU 1 ~ i'" ",dl ~/WUL' 1 ,,«.. ... )

- ..

.. -BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO

GOVERNOR OF HAWAII BRUCE S. ANDERSON, Ph.D., M.P.H.

DIRECTOR OF HEALTH

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

A\O: 0 S

P.O.BOX 3378 In repfy, please refer to:

HONOLULU, HAWAII 96801-3378

June 20, 2000

The Honorable Timothy Johns Chairman of the Board Department of Land and Natural Resources Attn: Ms. Linnel Nishioka, Deputy Director 1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Dear Mr. Johns:

SUBJECT: PROPOSED SOURCE OF POTABLE WATER

EMD/SDWB

Enclosed for your review and comment is a copy of the engineering report for the following source:

Hanapepe Well No. 4 State Well No. 2-5634-02 Hanapepe, Kauai

This report has been prepared pursuant to Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 20, Rules Relating to Potable Water Systems, section 11-20-29.

The Department of Health will use your comments in determining the potential impacts that may result by the proposed project.

Please submit your comments to the Safe Drinking Water Branch within 30 days from the date of this letter. You may also return the engineering report to this office if you do not need it for future reference.

If you should have any questions, please call Stuart Yamada of the Safe Drinking Water Branch, Engineering Section, at 586-4258.

Sincerely,

~4~l~#f!chief Safe Drinking Water Branch Environmental Management Division

Enclosure

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.. -""~ ... , .

'~j.;- . '.

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ENGINEERING REPORT FOR

HANAPEPE WELL DEVELOPMENT, TRANSMISSION AND APPURTENANCES

Hanapepe Well No.4 (State Well No. 5634-02)

Prepared for:

County of Kauai DEPARTMENT OF WATER

June 2000

FUKUNAGA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers

1388 Kapiolani Boulevard, 2nd Floor Honolulu, Hawaii 96814

(808) 944-1821

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, being a registered professional engineer, certifies that:

1. He has prepared the attached report and the information contained therein is true to the best of his information and belief; and

2. The water produced by Hanapepe Well No. 4 (State Well No. 5634-02), the potable water system identified in the attached report, will comply with the State primary potable water regulations contained in Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 20, Rules Relating to Potable Water Systems, and will comply with the Rules and Regulations of the Department of Water Supply, County of Kauai when said drinking water system is operated and maintained in accordance with the instructions and information contained in this report.

This work was prepared by me or under my supervision.

~~ UOflK. Nishimura FUKUNAGA & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION

A. GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................ 1 B. OWNER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ..................... 1

II. PHYSICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA

III.

IV.

V.

A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J.

LOCATION ................................................ ' ...... 1 CLIMATE ....................................................... 4 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................... 4 GEOLOGy ...................................................... 4 SO~ ........................................................... 4 SEISMIC CONDmONS ............................................ 8 HYDROLOGY ................................................... 8 FLOOD AND TSUNAMI .......................................... 10 LAND CLASSIFICATION AND ZONING ............................ 10 WATER RIGHTS ................................................ 13

HANAPEPE-ELEELE WATER SYSTEM

A. EXISTING HANAPEPE-ELEELE WATER SYSTEM ................... 13 B. POPULATION SERVED .......................................... 13 C. WATER USE .................................................... 16 D. FUTURE WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ....................... 16 E. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ..................... 18

SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY

A. SURFACEWATER .............................................. 19 B. GROUNDWATER ............................................... 20 C. EXISTrnG WEILS ............................................... 20

HANAPEPE WELL DEVELOPMENT, TRANSMISSION AND APPURTENANCES

A. LAND ACQUISmON AND EASEMENTS ........................... 21 B. HANAPEPE WElL ............................................... 21 C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................... 23

VI. WATER QUALITY .................................................... 25

VII. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION AND TREATMENT .................... 26

Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Pagei

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

Table of Contents

vm. SYSTEM OPERATION

A. NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS ................................. 26 B. HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 OPERATING CONDmONS ................. 30 C. FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERATION ................................ 31

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS

A. LANDUSE ..................................................... 31 B. FLORA AND FAUNA ............................................ 34 C. ARCHEOLOGICAL FEATURES .................................... 34 D. HYDROLOGY .................................................. 34 E. PUBliC FUNDS, ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ....... 35

x. LIST OF PERMITS AND APPROVALS .................................. 35

XI. REFERENCES ........................................................ 36

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION

APPENDICES

A. HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 AS-BUILTS AND AQUIFER REPORT B. FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS C. WATER QUAUTY ANALYSES- HANAPEPEWELLA

HANAPEPE WELL 25-1 (HANAPEPE TOWN WELL)

D. WATERQUAUTY ANALYSES- HANAPEPEWELLNO.4

Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Page ii

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I. INTRODUCTION

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Hanapepe Well No.4 will serve the Hanapepe-Eleele water system, Public Water System 404. The Hanapepe-Eleele water system, owned and operated by the County of Kauai, Department of Water (DOW), serves Hanapepe Town and the residential communities of Hanapepe and Eleele. The water system presently relies on three well sources located in the Hanapepe River Valley. Access to the existing well sites have often been hampered by flooding of the Hanapepe River, compromising the ability of DOW to maintain the wells. There is some erosion around the existing transmission main at the river crossing which will be repaired and protected in the near future. In addition, the current source capacity for the Hanapepe-Eleele Water System does not meet maximum day requirements based on the DOW Water System Standard. The development of Hanapepe Well No.4 will provide a more reliable ground water source, and will increase source capacity to meet maximum day demand requirements.

The subject project involves the development of Hanapepe Well No.4; construction of a 12-inch transmission main from Hanapepe Well No.4 to the existing Reservoir 402; and construction of a bypass at the Reservoir 212 site to permit flow from Reservoir 402 to Reservoir 212 (see Figures 1 and 2).

B. OWNER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

County of Kauai Department of Water

Contact: Ernest Y.W. Lau Manager and Chief Engineer (808)245-5403

II. PHYSICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA

A. LOCATION

Hanapepe Well No.4 is approximately 2.5 miles inland from the coast, north of Hanapepe Town in the Waimea District on the island of Kauai (see Figure 1). The site is mauka (north) of the Cliffside at Hanapepe residential subdivision (a new subdivision above the Hanapepe Heights subdivision), between Kapahili Gulch and Papalu Gulch (see Figure 2). Vehicular access to the site is via Moi Road (the nearest improved County street) and cane haul roads owned by the Robinson Family, and maintained by Gay and Robinson.

Page 1 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I HANALEI

I KAWAIHAU

I I I I I

Mokahueno PI.

I I ISLAND OF KAUAI

I I I .... I

NORTH

NO SCALE

ISLAND MAP FIGURE 1

I Page 2

I I I .: .

;1 i ',. . .' ~ '. '.

I ;; \ ' !I ,;:';~.

'-..:. •• -.. ;('h\.

I I I I I I I I I I I I \

I I

-.It NORTH PROJECT PLAN

SCALE: 1"=2000' FIGURE2 .

I Page 3

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

B. CLIMATE

The mean annual rainfall in the project area is approximately 40 inches per year. About six miles inland the rainfall increases to 120 inches per year. The average temperature ranges from a low of 60 degrees to a high of 85 degrees Fahrenheit. The prevailing wind is from the East Northeast.

C. TOPOGRAPHY

Consisting of gently sloping hills and deep and narrow valleys, the topography of the Hanapepe-Eleele area is diverse as shown in Figure 3. Near the well site, where the ground elevation is about 460 feet, the land slopes down toward the south at 20 to 30 percent. The ground elevation of the transmission main varies from 460 feet near the well site to 280 feet at the bottom of Kapahili Gulch. The sides of Kapahili Gulch slope downward at 30 to 40 percent on the east (or well site) side and 40 to 50 percent on the west (or Reservoir 402) side.

D. GEOLOGY

Geologic formations underlying the project area are lavas from the Waimea Canyon Volcanic Series, Napali formation (Twn) generated during the late Tertiary period, and lavas from the Koloa Volcanic Series (Qkl) formed during the Pleistocene epoch (see Figure 4). Extensively eroded deposits from recent geologic activity (erosion/deposition) also exist.

The exploratory drilling and testing of Hanapepe Well No.4 revealed that the well penetrated the highly permeable basalts of the Napali Volcanics which is known to be a basal source.

E. SOILS

The soil types present in the vicinity of the project area are shown in Figure 5. The soil types occurring at the well site are:

MhE - Makaweli stony silty clay loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes; low shrink-swell potential, low corrosivity, runoff is rapid and erosion hazard is severe, and;

rRR - Rough Broken Land, 40 to 70 percent slopes; runoff is rapid and geologic erosion is active.

The soil types occurring along the portion of 12-inch transmission main within the dirt road include:

MhE - Makaweli stony silty clay loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes; low shrink-swell potential, low corrosivity, runoff is rapid and erosion hazard is severe;

Page 4 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

-------------------

? VI

~ ALIGNMENT OF 12-INCH TRANSMISSION MAIN NORTH

SCALE: 1'=400' FIGURE 3

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ')."

'; :

\:: .. :" LEGEND:

I / Qb = Calcareous Sediment / Qa = NonCalcareous Sediment

Qk1 = Koloa Volcanic Series Twn = Waimea Volcanic Series (Napali Formation)

I o 02 = Existing Well 15524-021 = Well Number

I I

... NORTH GEOLOGY MAP AND EXISTING WELLS

SCALE: 1"=2000' FIGURE 4

I Page 6

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

SOURCE: SoH Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Mau£ Mc;>loka£ and Lanai State of

LEGEND:

BN HIlA, HnA, HrB

loB, IoC, IoD2, IoE2 JkB

I KOYE

I LhC, L1B, L1C HaD, MaD3, HaE, MaE3

. MgB, NgC, MgD, MgE2 MhB, MhC, MhO, MhE

I-NORTH I SCALE: 1":2000'

- BADLAND-MAHANA COMPLEX • HANALEI SILTY CLAY; PEATY IN PLACES; SILTY

LOAM • IOLEAU SILTY CLAY LOAM AND SILTY CLAY • JAUCAS SAND • KEKAHA SILTY CLAY OR CLAY; txTREKELY STONY

IN PLACES • LIHUE SILTY CLAY; GRAVELLY IN PLACES • MAHANA SILT LOAM AND SILTY CLAY LOAM - MAKAWELI SILTY CLAY LOAM AND SILT LOAM

NeC, NCO, HeE2 Nne, HoC 010 PdA, PdC, PHXC

PwC, PwD, pwE rRH rRR rRO WJF

_ NIU SILTY CLAY LOAM AND SILTY CLAY • NONOPAMU CLAY AND SILTY CLAY - OLI SILT LOAK; BEDROCK _ PAJ<ALA STRATIFIED CLAY LOAM, VERY FINE SANDY

LOAM, SILT LOAN. AND SILTY CLAY LOAM; f:XTREKELY STONY IN PLACES

_ PW OPA! SILTY CLAY LOAM AND SILTY CLAY

• RIVERWASH • ROUGH BROKEN LAKD - ROCK OUTCROP • WAIAWA CLAY; BEDROCK

SOIL SURVEY MAP Page 7 FIGURES

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

MhC - Makaweli stony silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes; low shrink-swell potential, low corrosivity, runoff is medium and erosion hazard is moderate.

MgD - Makaweli silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes; low shrink-swell potential, low corrosivity, runoff is rapid and erosion hazard is severe.

NcC - Niu silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes; moderate permeability, runoff is medium, and erosion hazard is moderate.

NcD - Niu silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes; moderate permeability, runoff is rapid, and erosion hazard is severe.

NnC - Nonopahu clay, 2 to 10 percent slopes; high shrink-swell potential, low to moderate corrosivity, runoff is medium and erosion hazard is moderate.

The soil types occurring along the portion of 12-inch transmission crossing Kapahili Gulch and the Reservoir 402 site include:

PHXC - Pakala extremely stony sandy clay loam, 0 to 12 percent slopes; stones make­up about 30 percent, by volume, of the subsoil. Runoff is slow and erosion hazard is slight.

rRR - Rough Broken Land, 40 to 70 percent slopes; runoff is rapid and geologic erosion is active.

The soil types occurring at the Reservoir 212 Site are the MgB - Makaweli silty clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slope; runoff is slow and erosion hazard is slight.

F. SEISMIC CONDmONS

According to the Uniform Building Code, 1991, the island of Kauai is in Seismic Zone No.1; therefore the risk of any seismic activity occurring on the island is minimal.

G. HYDROLOGY

Hanapepe Well No.4 is located within the Makaweli Aquifer System near the boundary between the Makaweli and Hanapepe Aquifer Systems as designated by the Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM, see Figure 6). The Makaweli Aquifer System encompasses the area west of the Hanapepe River to the Waimea River. The principal geologic formation found in the Makaweli Aquifer is the Waimea Canyon volcanic series. On the eastern side of the Makaweli Aquifer, where Hanapepe Well No.4 is located, exists the Napali member. The coastal areas of Makaweli Aquifer consist of the Koloa volcanic series, which extends five miles inland and covers the Makaweli and Napali members.

Page 8 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Princeville ~ WAI ' - --.KALI H I "/

/' \/ t/\., '\- '20201 / ,

I ( '? 'l /' KILAUEA ./ ' ) I' 7 } 20105, . J l (HANALEI ) (, ~

, If \ ''-,. 20202 ~ \. ( ,.J

(( \ '\ f I '~. __ ; . ..........-'_-"\..., ~ \ \ \,-~ " INIHA <. , <. '--' ~ h WA I \ ." . NA PAll /j" ,.~., 2~203 \ , > ' ) 20204 ('.J J ~. ''''"' '\..) \~ \ . ./. ANAHOLA

( ~.-/-,/\ .. '\ -t /.1 I 20104

' "~~,, ~ ( J ~ \.

) -WAl~EA" \! . _, \:, "-. "---. - - -1, '(; / 20302~~:'~. ~'- \/A.., \.-.-.~, _'\

{/ ~ ./'-. ~ ../-~. ';0..' \ ,-/ ./ ~~WAltU):--'~w.'u \ r./ ./ .~)\ ~l 20'~J(

KEKAHA ./ y' /d',/) ~ 1;:._._. 20301 5f ; / j r k' V /'

i iHANAPEPE~.~' HAN \ t \ 20304.) ~20102 ~ . .-'f

, '/ MAKAWELI ) (-(j' \. ~"". 20303 j Y I '"'- . '"" ,_

~ HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 1_ . ....-. '.Co

5 MILES \... [...r? KOLOA o I I I I I ~ ~ Hanapepe 20101 I I I I I ~ KILOMETERS o

Base dig_iud from U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles for the Island of Kauai

EXPLANA nON

- • - AQUIFER-SYSTEM BOUNDARY

KOLOA AQUIFER-SYSTEM NAME AND 20101 NUMBER

SOURCE: Estimated Water Use In 1990, Island of Kauai, Hawaii; U.S. G. S. (Modified from George A.L. Yuen and Associates, 1990).

1IIt NORTH KAUAI AQUIFER SYSTEMS

FIGURE 6

Page 9

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

The Hanapepe Aquifer System encompasses the area east of Makaweli Aquifer to the Hanapepe River. The interior two thirds of the Hanapepe Aquifer is covered by the Napali member. The lower one third drains the Koloa terrain. A strip of alluvium extends approximately five miles into the Hanapepe Valley.

According to the Water Resources Protection Plan Volume I, dated March 1992, prepared for the CWRM, the Makaweli Aquifer and Hanapepe Aquifer have sustainable yields of 30 mgd and 26 mgd, respectively. The sustainable yield of an aquifer refers to the withdrawal of groundwater at a rate in which the aquifer can be sustained indefinitely without affecting the quality of the pumped groundwater.

H. FLOOD AND TSUNAMI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency's March 4, 1987 Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 150002 0180 C for Kauai County designates the project area to be within Zone X, areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain.

Tsunami inundation areas are located in low-lying areas along the shore-line. This does not affect the project area which is on high ground and about 2.5 miles inland from the coast.

I. LAND CLASSIFICATION AND ZONING

The following table lists the State Land Use (see Figure 7), Kauai County General Plan (see Figure 8) and Zoning designations for the various project components. The land use and zoning permit for the subject project was approved by the Kauai Planning Commission on July 23, 1998.

Project Land Classification and Zoning

Project Component

Hanapepe Well No.4 Site Development

12" Transmission line - Well Site to Kapahili Gulch

12- Transmission Line - Kapahili Gulch Crossing

Reservoir 402 Site

Reservoir 212 Site

Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

State County Land Use General Plan

Agriculture Agriculture

Agriculture Agriculture

Agriculture Open

Agriculture Open

Urban Urban

County Zoning Designation

Agriculture

Agriculture

Agriculture

Agriculture

Residential

Page 10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.'" a'l'I I C" I I I~c;.''''''-'''CI

~'"''

0: ./~

... NORTH

SCALE: 1"=2000'

o

STATE LAND USE DISTRICT MAP

Page 11

RURAL

AGRICULTURE

URBAN

CONSERVATION

FIGURE 7

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'-.J '-. ''-;:-"/.g \~~-,' • : I /~'.;.' ~ '._.

~

.... NORTH GENERALPLAN-KAUAICOUNTY

SCALE: 1"=2000'

Page 12

A Agriculture o Open PF Public Facilities UMU Urban Mixed Use UR Urban Residential

l

FIGURE 8

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

J. WATER RIGHTS

The Commission on Water Resource Management, Department of Land and Natural Resources monitors and regulates water use throughout the state. There are no water management areas designated on the island of Kauai. The Pump Installation Permit was approved by the Commission on July 27,1998. I

III. HANAPEPE·ELEELE WATER SYSTEM

A. EXISTING HANAPEPE-ELEELE WATER SYSTEM

The Hanapepe-Eleele water system is owned and operated by DOW and is shown on Figure 9. The water system currently serves Hanapepe Town and the residential communities of Hanapepe and Eleele.

The water system consists of three groundwater wells, three booster pump stations, and five storage reservoirs. The three groundwater wells, Hanapepe Wells A, B, and No. 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well), are located in the Hanapepe River Valley. Groundwater from the wells is pumped directly into a 0.5 million gallon (MG) concrete reservoir which is located in the Hanapepe Heights subdivision at a spillway elevation of 212 feet, hereinafter referred to as "Reservoir 212." Reservoir 212 serves Zones 1301,04, and 05. Refer to Figure 10 for service zone delineation.

Two booster pump stations pump water from Reservoir 212 to three higher reservoirs. One booster pump station is located at the Reservoir 212 site (Cliffside Boosters) and pumps water to a 0.5 MG concrete tank situated above the Cliffside at Hanapepe subdivision, with a spillway elevation of 402 feet ("Reservoir 402"). Reservoir 402 serves Zones 1302 and 1303. A second booster pump station is located in the Hanapepe River Valley about a mile down the river from Hanapepe Wells A and B. This pump station boosts water up to twin 0.4 MG steel reservoirs situated above the Eleele Nani Subdivision at the 340 feet spillway elevation ("Lower Eleele Reservoir") and serve Zone 1307. A third booster pump station at the 0.4 MG twin reservoir site lifts water to a fifth reservoir (0.2 MG) located uphill from the twin reservoirs at a spillway elevation of 402 feet ("Upper Eleele Reservoir") which serve Zone 1306.

From the five reservoirs, water is distributed to six hydraulic service zones and sub­zones within the Hanapepe-Eleele water system via pipelines ranging in size from 1 ~­inches to 12-inches.

B. POPULATION SERVED

The Hanapepe-Eleele area could be characterized as primarily rural residential communities. Most of the surrounding area is used for growing sugarcane and coffee. Most of the urban zoned lands have been developed into residential subdivisions.

Page 13 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

,. ~ ,

I'~~

I Zones

Total 1302,03

0.17 0.18 0.80

I .0.26 0.27 1.20

0.51 0.53 2.38

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

JII

_-60---" ( \ \ I , I

\ f ) I I . s ! \ 4

I •

.. '

I .. NORTH HANAPEPE-ELEELE WATER SYSTEM SERVICE ZONES

I FIGURE 10

Page 15

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

Commercial development is limited to the Hanapepe Town area and a small neighborhood shopping center in Eleele. Many of the residents commute to Lihue, Poipu or other areas for employment.

Detailed 1990 Oatest year available) census population of the Hanapepe and Eleele areas were 1,395 and 1,489, respectively. Based on the population study conducted in the "Eleele Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Phase I" report, dated May 1993 and prepared by Fukunaga & Associates, Inc., the projected population of the Hanapepe­Eleele area in 2010 is 8,300. The full build-out population based on County zoning is estimated to be 13,500 people.

C. WATER USE

Groundwater within the Makaweli Aquifer and Hanapepe Aquifer is used for domestic and irrigation purposes. Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well), which withdraw groundwater from the Hanapepe Aquifer (sustainable yield of 26 mgd) provide water for domestic use to the entire Hanapepe-Eleele Water System. DOW consumption records show that in FY1999 the Hanapepe-Eleele Water System had a total demand of 0.86 mgd. According to the CWRM Hawaii Water Plan, Kauai Water Use and Development Plan, Island of Kauai, dated February 1990, total groundwater used for irrigation within the Hanapepe Aquifer was 2.1 mgd, and no groundwater within the Makaweli Aquifer was used for irrigation. For surface water, the report indicated that 7.02 mgd was used for irrigation within the Makaweli Aquifer and 77.6 mgd was used within the Hanapepe Aquifer.

D. FUTURE WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

1. STORAGE AND PUMP CAPACITIES

The Hanapepe-Eleele water system storage and pump capacities were evaluated in accordance with the DOW 1985 Water System Standards. Current consumption data was provided by the DOW. Future water demands were projected from full development based on land use indicated on the Kauai County Hanapepe-Port Allen-Eleele Zoning Map and consumption rates established in the Water System Standards. Other developments such as the State Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Housing development in Hanapepe Heights were not included in the projections.

a. Reservoir Capacity

According to the Water System Standards, reservoir capacity must meet the greater of maximum day demand; or maximum day rate plus fire flow for the duration of the fire when the reservoir is 3/4 full with credit for incoming flow from pumps, and one maximum size pump out of service. Evaluation of the Hanapepe-Eleele Water System reservoir capacity, which included the

Page 16 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

improvements proposed for this project (Hanapepe Well No.4, 12-inch transmission main, and bypass), was found to be satisfactory for existing consumption. However, at full development, the capacity of Reservoirs 212 and 402 will not meet the maximum day demand of Zones 1301,2,3,4, and 1305. An additional 0.64 MG will be required. The reservoir capacity for Zone 1307 also will be deficient, and an additional 0.24 MG will be required to meet full development demands.

b. Pumping Capacity

The Water System Standards require that the total pump capacity meets maximum day demand with an operating time of 16 hours, and with the largest pump out of service. Based on this requirement, the existing water system (without the improvements proposed for this project), with a total available well pump capacity of 0.57 mgd (pumps operating 16 hours a day with the largest pump, Hanapepe Well B, out of service), has insufficient pump capacity to meet the present maximum day demand of 1.2 mgd. With the addition of the Hanapepe Well No.4 to the system, which has a pumping rate of 700 gpm, the total available pump capacity increases to 1.24 mgd. Hanapepe Well B remains the largest pump, and therefore considered out of service. Maximum day demand for full development is projected to be 3.0 mgd. With a total available well pump capacity of 1.24 mgd, an additional 1.76 mgd will be required.

The three booster pumping stations within the Hanapepe-Eleele Water System were found to be adequate to meet current maximum day demands. For full development, one booster pumping station was found to be inadequate. The two 700 gpm booster pumps that pump water to the Lower Eleele Twin 0.4 MG reservoirs (Zone 1307) were deficient by 0.57 mgd. The Cliffside Booster pumps (at the Reservoir 212 site) together with Hanapepe Well No.4 pump provide sufficient capacity to meet full development demands for Zones 1302 and 1303. The booster pumps that pump to the Upper Eleele 0.2 MG reservoir (Zone 1306) is also adequate to meet full development demands.

2. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

The existing distribution system sustains adequate velocities and pressures in accordance with the Water System Standards under existing as well as full development conditions.

Page 17 FukuTUlga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development. Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

E. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

1. No Project Alternative

One alternative to the proposed project is the "no project" alternative. This would result in no change of existing conditions. The Hanapepe-Eleele Water System source requirements would continue to be deficient in meeting maximum day demand.

2. Alternative Well Sites

Other well sites were considered for exploratory drilling in the Hanapepe area. The Hanapepe Well No.4 site was selected since the well would tap into the Napali Volcanics which was considered an excellent basal water source. The 1993 pump test and subsequent water quality test showed that Hanapepe Well No.4 is a high yielding well with potable water quality and very suitable for development.

3. Alternate Transmission Main Alignment

An alternative transmission main alignment was considered for this project. The alternate alignment followed existing cane haul roads which provided vehicle access to the well site from Moi Road, the nearest improved County street. At Moi Road the transmission line would connect into an existing 12-inch water main within Moi Road that serves as the influent-effluent line for Reservoir 402. This alignment was not selected because it would interfere with Gay and Robinson's current and long-term agricultural operations.

4. Water Conservation

Water conservation programs can be used to better meet future water demands, and are typically implemented when a water shortage is likely. However, Kauai experiences a very wet climate and has an abundant groundwater and surface water supply. The water sources for the Hanapepe-Eleele Water System are located in the Makaweli, Hanapepe, and Koloa Aquifers, which have a combined sustainable yield of 86 mgd. The average water use in this water system in FY1999 was approximately 0.86 mgd, one percent (1 %) of the estimated sustainable yield. Even with further development of well water sources, the water use will be a mere fraction of the aquifer yield. Although it is a practice that should be observed by all consumers, water conservation alone will not provide the quantity of water required to meet demands. The DOW is initiating a water conservation program to reduce demands; however, the anticipated savings will not affect the need for this project.

Page 18 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

5. Rainfall Catchment

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

Rainfall catchment involves the construction of a series of ditches and reservoirs to intercept rainfall runoff from large areas of land, and is an ideal source for agriCUltural use. According to the Kauai Water Use and Development Plan, over 80 percent of the water used on Kauai is by sugarcane plantations which rely on rainfall catchment (surface waters) as the primary water source. However, if surface water is used to supply municipal drinking water systems, it is subject to the DOH Surface Water Treatment Rule which requires costly and cumbersome treatment, monitoring and reporting. Consequently, the immense cost of constructing, operating, and maintaining a water treatment facility renders this alternative infeasible, especially when there is an ample supply of potable groundwater.

6. Wastewater Reuse and Nonpotable Water Supplies

Wastewater reuse and nonpotable water supplies are potentially viable alternative water sources for applications such as irrigation. However, the relative cost to construct, maintain and operate facilities to properly treat wastewater and nonpotable water is relatively higher than the cost to provide water from a potable groundwater source. Irrigation water is not in critically short supply in this area; therefore, the relative value of and demand for treated sewage effluent and nonpotable water supplies is considered to be low.

The treatment plant in the area is the Eleele Wastewater Treatment Plant, and it produces about 0.35 mgd of treated effluent which could potentially be used by the large agriCUltural acreage nearby, operated by McBryde Sugar Company. However, concern was expressed that irrigating with treated sewage effluent might detract from the company's marketing of "high quality" coffee beans to Hills Brothers. Accordingly, reclamation and re-use of the effluent was deemed, by McBryde Sugar Co., to be not viable. The costs to construct, operate, and monitor the facilities necessary to treat wastewater and nonpotable water in an area where potable groundwater is readily available, render this alternative infeasible and undesirable.

IV. SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY

A. SURFACE WATER

The major stream in the area near the project site is the Hanapepe River. Streams feeding into the Hanapepe River include the Manuahi Stream and Koula River. Hanapepe River has a mean daily discharge of approximately 55 mgd (measured at U.S.O.S. Stream Oage No. 0490). According to the CWRM Water Resources Protection Plan, dated 1992, 24 mgd is diverted from the stream for irrigation purposes at the Koula ditch intake, which is 3 miles upstream of the stream gage.

Page 19 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

B. GROUNDWATER

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

According to the hydrologist retained during the drilling and testing of the Hanapepe Well No.4, the direction of groundwater flow in the vicinity of the well site is uncertain at this time.

C. EXISTING WELLS

According to the CWRM well data records, there currently are 11 existing wells and tunnels near Hanapepe Well No.4. Three wells are situated within the Makaweli Aquifer and eight are within the Hanapepe Aquifer (see Figure 4 and Table 1).

State Well Year

Name or Location No. drilled

Hanapepe Valley A 5533-01 1974

Hanapepe Valley B 5533-02 1980

Hanapepe Pump 3 5534-01 1899

Hanapepe Pump 1 5534-02 1899

Hanapepe Town (Hanapepe 25-1)

5534-03 1966

Hanapepe Pump 2 5534-04 1899

Hanapepe 5534-05 1988

Hanapepe Tunnel 5633-01 1957

Hanapepe 4 5634-02 1993

Hanapepe Ridge 5634-01 1961

Domestic Water 5635-01 1947

500 H.P.IRR 5635-02 1969

Table 1 Existing Well Records

Gnd, Csg. Csg. Elev. Dia. Depth (ft.) (in.) {ft. {

98 14 126

99 12 270

28

21

78 8 109

24

570

138

462" 14 502

440 8 508

376

376 20 415

Well Static Depth Head ChI. Aq.

(ft.) (ft.) (mg/l) Sys. Use

190 23.54 28 Ha Mun

401 22.5 34 Ha Mun

78 5 Ha Irr

40 Ha Unu

109 17.11 40 Ha Mun

54 Ha Unu

570 Ha Unu

138 18 17 Ha Unu'

568 18.8 125 Ha Unu

508 16.5 180 Ma Unu

364 26 Ma Dom

460 17.7 530 Ma Irr

Source of Data: Commission on Water Resource Management (Mun - Municipal, Irr - irrigation, Unu - Unused, Dom - Domestic) • Data updated based on recent information.

Based on the CWRM well records, only two wells are currently used within the Makaweli Aquifer: Well No. 5635-01 and Well No. 5635-02, both are approximately 6,000 feet west of the Hanapepe Well No.4. Well 5635-01 is used as a private domestic water source and has a pump capacity of 1.5 mgd. Well 5635-02 is used for irrigation purposes. No pump capacity data is available for the well.

Page 20 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

The CWRM records also show four wells are currently used within the Hanapepe Aquifer. Three of the four wells are: Hanapepe Wells A (5533-01t,B (5533-02( and 25-~anapepe Town Well, 5534-03)(each with pump rates of 470igpm, 900~m, and 125 gpm, respectively (pump rates provided by the DOW). The three wells have a total installed pump capacity of 2.15 mgd.

The fourth well, Hanapepe Pump 3 (5534-01, a tunnel source), is used for irrigation purposes. Hanapepe Pump 3, is owned and operated by Alexander and Baldwin and has a pump capacity of 35 mgd. Both groundwater from the tunnel (gravity fed) and water from Hanapepe River are pumped to ditches that irrigate coffee fields and other crops in areas east of Eleele town.

Per CWRM, there is only one well construction permit approved for the Makaweli Aquifer (Well No. 5639-01). The proposed withdrawal for the well is approximately 50 gpm or 72,000 gpd. There are no well construction permits for the Hanapepe Aquifer.

v. HANAPEPE WELL DEVELOPMENT, TRANSMISSION AND APPURTENANCES

A. LAND ACQUISmON AND EASEMENTS

The subject project is on State of Hawaii and privately owned lands. Refer to Figure 11 for Tax Map Key. The portion of the project within State owned lands is: the Hanapepe Well No.4 site, a portion of the 12-inch transmission main (about 500 lineal feet) between the well site and Kapahili Gulch, which is leased to Gay and Robinson; and the Reservoir 212 site. The State owned lands are designated as TMK: 1-8-07: 10 and 1-8-13: 36. The remaining portion of the 12-inch transmission main is within TMK: 1-7-06: 05 and 06, which are owned by the Robinson Family.

Except for the Reservoir 212 site, which is situated in a residential subdivision, the project is surrounded by agricultural lands generally used for cultivating sugarcane. The portion of the project that crosses Kapahili Gulch is used for cattle grazing.

Access to the well site and transmission main will be through existing dirt roads that are on lands owned by the State and by the Robinson Family. A 20 foot wide (minimum) access and utility easement along the 12-inch transmission line will be acquired from the State and the Robinson Family by the DOW for access and maintenance of the pipeline and Kauai Electric use. The well site will be acquired by executive order.

B. HANAPEPE WEIL

Hanapepe Well No.4 was constructed in the first phase of this project in February 1993 by the DOW, and tested in May and April of 1993. It has been designated as State Well No. 5634-02 with 21056'latitude and 159034'longitude. The well depth is 568 feet and depth to water is 443 feet. Design well draft is 1 mgd. The elevation of the well site is at approximately 464 feet. The well completion report with pump test data is included in Appendix A.

Page 21 Fukunaga eft Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

C. PROmCT DESCRIPTION

The main components of the project, which are described below, include developing Hanapepe Well No.4; constructing a 12-inch transmission main from Hanapepe Well No.4 to the existing Reservoir 402; and constructing a bypass at the Reservoir 212 site to permit flow from Reservoir 402 to Reservoir 212. Refer to Appendix B for the pertinent final construction plans.

1. Development of Hanapepe Well No.4 involved the installation of a line shaft vertical turbine water lubricated deep well pump (700 gpm, 535 feet TDH). Refer to Figure 12 for the pump performance curve. The pump discharge piping is equipped with a silent check valve and slow opening/closing hydraulically controlled control valve to minimize the possibility of water hammer.

Other improvements to the well site include construction of a pump control building, pump controls and appurtenances, chlorination facilities, hydro-pneumatic system, electrical work, retaining wall, drainage system, fencing, and asphaltic and reinforced concrete paving.

2. The 12-inch transmission main connecting Hanapepe Well No.4 to the existing Hanapepe-Eleele Water System is approximately 3,600 lineal feet. The pipeline is buried from the well site within the existing cane haul road leading to Kapahili Gulch. Along the dirt road, the pipeline crosses under an existing ditch. Upon reaching Kapahili Gulch, the buried main proceeds down the eastern side of the gulch, to the bottom, and cross under a stream bed to the opposite side of the gulch. The pipeline then proceeds up the opposite side of the gulch (west side), and is above ground on piers due to the steep terrain and rock formations encountered along the slope. At the top of the gulch, the pipeline is buried, and connects to the Reservoir 402 12-inch influent/effluent line.

A 10 to 15 foot wide area was cleared along the segment of pipeline within Kapahili Gulch to facilitate maintenance of the pipeline. An existing overgrown jeep road leading into Kapahili Gulch was cleared of surface obstructions to allow for vehicle travel.

3. Modification of the existing water facilities to allow water to flow from Reservoir 402 to Reservoir 212. This involved construction of a by-pass line at the Reservoir 212 site. All work on the by-pass line was confined to the existing reservoir site.

4. Providing power to the well site involved upgrading the existing aerial single phase power lines from the Cliffside Subdivision to the Reservoir 402 site to a three phase line, and extending the existing aerial line from the Reservoir 402 site to the well site. The aerial extension consists of four wires, and spans the width of the gulch from the Reservoir 402 site to the other (east) side of the gulch. At each end of the span, there are wooden H-frame supports approximately 50 feet high. On the east side of the gulch, the aerial lines suspended by single wooden poles follow the 12-inch transmission main alignment.

Page 23 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

5. Radio telemetry links between the well site, Reservoir 402 site, and Reservoir 212 site are provided to control and monitor the operations between the deep well pump and reservoirs.

The subject project is funded by the State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources and the DOW. The facilities will be turned over to the DOW upon approval and acceptance. There are no restrictions on the water allocation for the project.

VI. WATER QUALITY

There has been no contamination of any of the municipal groundwater sources near the Hanapepe Well No.4 site. The water quality results performed on the two nearby wells, Hanapepe Wells A and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) are provided in Appendix C. The results show no indication of contamination.

Water quality analyses were performed on water samples collected from Hanapepe Well No. 4 on May 5, 1993 during the May-April pump test. The constituents for which tests were performed were either not detected or below the maximum contaminant level established in current potable water requirements. Since 1993, changes were made to the Department of Health (DOH) water quality testing procedures for new potable water sources. Consequently, the 1993 results have been deemed outdated, and additional analyses were required to meet current DOH requirements.

Additional water quality analyses were performed after the permanent pump was installed during the construction of the project and water samples collected, in accordance with the DOH Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 20, Potable Water System Rules. The results are presented in Appendix D.

Hanapepe Well No.4 is located in the midst of existing sugar cane fields, and is subject to potential contamination from the leaching of fertilizers and herbicides used in cultivation. Nitrate, a good indicator of contamination by fertilizers, was detected at 0.65 mgIL in Hanapepe Well No.4. This concentration is well below the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 mgIL (nitrate-nitrogen).

Barium, chromium, copper, lead, fluoride and chloroform were also detected at levels well below the MCL as listed in the following table.

Biological test results meet the DOH requirements.

Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Page 25

I I I I I I

Contaminants

Nitrate-N (mg/L)

Barium (mg/L)

Chromium (mgIL)

Copper (mg/L)

Lead (mgIL)

Fluoride

Chloroform

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

MCl Water Quality Analyses

10 0.65

2 0.00268

0.1 0.0103

1.3 (Action Lvi) 0.00284

0.015 (Action Lvi) 0.00127

4 0.367

0.1 (for total trihalomethanes) 0.0002

I VII. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION AND TREATMENT

I I I I I I I I I I I I

The well site covers less than 0.5 acres, is paved, and has slopes ranging from 2% to 6%. The surrounding area is quite steep (steeper than 20% in some areas); therefore, the site has been graded and drainage swales constructed to direct runoff away from the well site.

A potential source of contamination for the Hanapepe Well No.4 would be from the surrounding sugarcane operation managed by Gay and Robinson. According to Gay and Robinson, they have used only one type of pesticide, atrazine in their sugarcane operations. From the water quality test, no trace of atrazine was detected in Hanapepe Well No. 4.

There are no individual wastewater systems near the well site since the well is in a remote area surrounded by sugarcane fields. Most of the Hanapepe and Eleele area is sewered except for some small pockets where cesspools or septic tanks are used. These unsewered areas are over a mile away from Hanapepe Well No.4.

Granular activated carbon treatment could be used to reduce and remove the potential contaminants if it becomes necessary.

VIII. SYSTEM OPERATION

A. NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS

Presently, Reservoir 402 only serves Zone 1302 (Figure 10) which has an average daily demand of roughly 120 gpm or 0.17 mgd. Based on an evaluation of energy requirements for serving Reservoir 402, the energy required to pump water from the wells serving Reservoir 212 (Hanapepe Wells A, Band 25-1) and boosting the water to Reservoir 402 is roughly 10-15% less than the energy required to pump water from Hanapepe Well No.4 to Reservoir 402. However, optimization of water system operations is not limited to energy efficiency, but also must address cycling water in reservoirs to minimize stagnation and exercising the deep well

Page 26 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

pumps regularly. Therefore, Hanapepe Well No.4 will be used to supply Zone 1302 and the Cliffside booster pumps from Reservoir 212 will function as a standby source for Reservoir 402. The following variables can be modified to determine the system operating conditions:

• Hanapepe Well No.4 operating period • Reservoir 402 cycling period • Bypass operating time and period • Hanapepe Well A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) operating periods

The cycling of Reservoir 402 directly impacts Hanapepe Well No.4 and the bypass operating periods. The proposed operating scenario sets the cycling period for Reservoir 402 at about 2 days or cycling one-half the volume (0.25 MG) daily. In light of the energy comparison, the use of Hanapepe Well No.4 should be minimized; accordingly, the volume bypassed from Reservoir 402 to Reservoir 212 should also be minimized. The volume of water to be conveyed from Reservoir 402 to Reservoir 212 should then be 0.25 MG less the 0.17 MG consumed by Zone 1302, or 80,000 gallons. Under these operating conditions, Hanapepe Well No.4 will pump approximately 6 hours a day; Hanapepe Wells A and B will average about 21 hours and 14 hours a day, respectively. See Schematics 1 and 2.

The water level settings in Reservoir 212 to start Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) require modification to accommodate the water to be bypassed from Reservoir 402:

Hanapepe Well A

Hanapepe Well B

Hanapepe Well 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well)

EXISTING SETTING (Elevation)

210.58

209.17

207.58

MODIFIED SETTING (Elevation)

209.17

207.58

207.5

Page 27 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

OBJECTIVE: Cyde 112 the volume of Reservoir 402 daily. Reservoir 402 primarily supplies Zone 1302 demand, excess conveyed to Reservoir 212 (timed bypass).

ZONES 1302 & 1303 AVE DAILY DEMAND 120 GPM (0.17 MGD)

LEGEND:

Reservoir

HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 OFF = 401.5'

NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS BYPASS CLOSED

BYPASS CLOSED HANAPEPE WELL NO.4

ON = 394'

CLIFFSIDE BOOSTERS ON =390'

RESERVOIR 402 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 402'

PSV-2 maintains Zone 1302 system pressure when bypass is open.

CLOSED /-psv-;-' r----------J L ___________ .

i \ !83psi J i : " ' / : I - ____ .... I : 1 i STANDBY i ! ,-------. 1

Hanapepe Well No.4 operates! 6 hours/day Ave yield! 0.3 MGD

FCVapplies backpressure to well pump to maintain 700 gpm flow rate.

PUMPS OFF = 211.71'

WELL A ON = 209.17'

WELL B ON = 207.58'

WELL 25-1 ON = 207.5'

RESERVOIR 212 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 212'

i / CLIFFSIDE \, i L _____ -' BOOSTER ,. _______ L __________________________________ _

, PUMPS 1 , 1 ''- ______ 1

Hanapepe Well A operates! 21 hours/day Ave yield ! 0.56 MGD

Hanapepe Well B operates !14 hours/da Ave yield! 0.76 MGD

NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS BYPASS CLOSED SCHEMATIC 1

Page 28

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

OBJECTIVE: Cyde 112 the volume of Reservoir 402 daily. Reservoir 402 primarily supplies Zone 1302 demand, excess conveyed to Reservoir 212 (timed bypass).

ZONES 1302 & 1303 AVE DAILY DEMAND 120 GPM (0.17 MGD)

HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 OFF =401.5'

BYPASS CLOSED HANAPEPE WELL NO.4

CLIFFSIDE BOOSTERS ON =390'

RESERVOIR 402 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 402'

NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS BYPASS OPEN

OPEN AT 10 PM CLOSE AT RESERVOIR 402 WL = 394' (BYPASS:!: 80,000 GPO)

0.25 MG - 0.17 MG = 0.08 MG 112 Reservoir - Zone 1302 = 80,000 gal

402 ave daily demand

Hanapepe Well No.4 operates:!: 6 hours/day Ave yield :!:0.3 MGD

FCVapplies backpressure to well pump to maintain 700 gpm flow rate.

Bypass flow rate fluctuates with reservoir water levels and system demand.

PSV-2 maintains Zone 1302 system pressure when bypass is open.

PUMPS OFF = 211.71'

WELL A ON = 209.17'

WELL B ON = 207.58'

LEGEND:

Reservoir

, , , , , , ,

OPEN

! STANDBY : I------~\

WELL 25-1 ON = 207.5'

RESERVOIR 212 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 212'

! / CLIFFSIDE " L ____ --' BOOSTER , _______ .l...-__ --.j '>---....,.1

\ PUMP / \ I '-------

Hanapepe Well A operates :!:21 hours/day Ave yield :!: 0.56 MGD

Hanapepe Well B operates :!:14 hours/day Ave yield :!:0.76 MGD

NORMAL SYSTEM OPERATIONS BYPASS OPEN SCHEMATIC 2

Page 29

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

Depending on the reservoir water levels and system demand, the bypass flow rates can fluctuate between ±450 gpm and ±550 gpm. Bypassing the water at night when the demand is lowest allows better control of the quantity of water bypassed. Therefore, the bypass solenoid valve (pSV -2) controlled by a timer would be set to open at 10 pm and close when Reservoir 402 is about half-empty or at 394'. Hanapepe Well No.4 will then start when Reservoir 402 is at 394' and will tum off at 401.5'. Refer to Schematic 2.

Modifying any of the operating variables will impact the other variables. For example, if the operating period for Hanapepe Well No.4 is reduced while maintaining the 80,000 gallons per day bypass volume, then the cycling period for Reservoir 402 will increase, and vice versa. If the bypass volume is increased, then the cycling period for Reservoir 402 will decrease, Hanapepe Well No.4 will operate longer, and the operating periods for Hanapepe Wells A and B will be shorter.

B. HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 OPERATING CONDITIONS

Hanapepe Well No.4 will operate in the following sequence: 1. Reservoir 402 water level drops to 394' (-Y2 empty) and transmits a signal to

start Hanapepe Well No.4. 2. Hanapepe Well No.4 pump starts; Flow Control Valve (FCV) remains closed.

Pressure upstream of the FCV increases and opens the Pressure Relief! Air ReleaseN acuum Breaker Valve (pRI ARNBV) for discharge of the flushing water and air to drain.

3. The FCV is controlled by timer and slowly opens 4 minutes after the pump starts causing the PRI ARNBV to close and water to enter the transmission main.

4. Flow switch downstream of the FCV actuates and starts chlorination. If no flow is sensed within 7 minutes of pump start, a relay will transmit an alarm signal to the DOW Main Office, and turn off the pump. An operator would then need to check the well site and turn off the alarm at the well site.

5. Flow switch downstream ofPSV-l (Pressure Sustaining Valve Assembly which keeps the transmission main full) actuates. If no flow is sensed within 10 minutes of pump start, a relay will transmit an alarm signal to the DOW Main Office, and turn off the pump. This indicates a break in the transmission main.

6. Reservoir 402 water level fills to 401.5', shut down sequence to close FCV and shut off Hanapepe Well No.4 pump. Flow switch on discharge piping releases, stopping chlorination.

Page 30 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

C. FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERATION

1. Zone 1302 and 1303 (refer to Schematic 3): Fire flow demand in Zone 1302 and 1303 will initially be served by Reservoir 402. The water level in Reservoir 402 will drop, close PSV-2 (if open), and start Hanapepe Well No.4. If Hanapepe Well No.4 capacity is not sufficient, and Reservoir 402 reaches low water level (390'), then the Cliffside booster pumps will turn on, keeping PSV-2 closed, and water will be boosted from Reservoir 212. As the water level in Reservoir 212 drops, Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) will start. When Reservoir 402 reaches high water level, the Cliffside booster pumps and Hanapepe Well No.4 will shut-off. Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) will shut-off when Reservoir 212 reaches high water level.

If the water level in Reservoir 212 drops to low water level (203'), then an override condition will occur: Cliffside booster pumps will turn off, and PSV -2 will remain closed.

2. Zone 1304,5,6,7 (refer to Schematic 4): Fire flow demand in Zones 1304,5,6,or 1307 will initially be served by Reservoir 212. The water level in Reservoir 212 will drop and start Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well). If the wells do not have sufficient capacity, and Reservoir 212 reaches low water level (203'), then PSV -2 will open, keeping the Cliffside booster pumps off, and water will bypass from Reservoir 402. As the water level in Reservoir 402 drops, Hanapepe Well No.4 will start and PSV -2 will remain open (override). When Reservoir 212 reaches high water level, PSV-2 will close and Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 (Hanapepe Town Well) will shut-off. Hanapepe Well No.4 will shut-off when Reservoir 402 reaches high water level.

If the water level in Reservoir 402 drops and PSV -2 cannot maintain an upstream pressure of 83 psi, then an override condition will occur: PSV-2 will close and the booster pumps will remain off. In addition, a float switch in Reservoir 402 will be set at 2 feet from the reservoir bottom to keep the Reservoir from emptying. If the water level drops below 2 feet, the solenoid on PSV-2 will close the bypass.

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS

A. LANDUSE

There will be loss of useable agricultural lands due to construction of the project. The loss of lands will be limited to development of the well site which includes construction of a control building, pump discharge piping and pumping pad, electrical facilities, and improved access to the site. The transmission main will be primarily underground as it traverses along existing cane haul roads and crosses Kapahili gulch. All other work required for the project will be done within the existing reservoir sites.

Page 31 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ZONE 1302 OR 1303 FIRE FLOW DEMAND

1000GPM

LEGEND:

Reservoir

HANAPEPE WELL NO.4 OFF =401.5'

(Cliffside Booster Pumps Off)

FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERA liONS ZONES 1302 OR 1303

(Refer to Schematics 1 and 2 for Normal System Operations)

CLIFFSIDE BOOSTERS ON = 390'

RESERVOIR 402 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 402'

If Reservoir 402 water level drops below 390', start Cliffside booster pumps. Hanapepe Well No.4 and Cliffside booster pumps remain on until Reservoir 402 reaches 401.5'.

OVERRIDE CONDITION: If Reservoir 212 water level PUMPS OFF = 211.71' drops below 203', Cliffside booster pumps will tum off, and I--WE_ L_L_A ...;..ON_=....,:2:..:..09:..:...1...;..7'---j

PSV-2 will remain closed. WELL B ON = 207.58'

CLOSED

I'-~~~;-\ __________ 1 _____________ , \ :!:83 psi I : , / I

:I~~~D: I BOOSTER r-~-----<

PUMPS

TO ZONES 1304,5,6,7

WELL 25-1 ON = 207.5'

RESERVOIR 212 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 212'

FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERATIONS ZONES 1302 OR 1303 SCHEMATIC 3

Page 32

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ZONE 1302 &1303 DEMAND = 120 GPM

(0.17 MGD) ~-

LEGEND:

Reservoir

HANAPEPE WEll NO.4 OFF =401.5'

CLIFFSIDE BOOSTERS ON = 390'

RESERVOIR 402 (0.5MG)

OVERFLOW = 402'

, , , , , , ,

FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERATIONS ZONES 1304,5,6, OR 1307 (Refer to Schematics 1 and 2 for Normal System Operations)

OVERRIDE CONDITION: If Reservoir 212 water level drops below 203', PSV-2 will open, and remains open until the system pressure drops in Zone 1302 and PSV-2 cannot maintain 83 psi. A float switch in Reservoir 402 set at 386' will close the solenoid on PSV-2 if PSV-2 does not close initially due to the system pressure drop.

If Reservoir 212 water level drops below 203', PSV-2 opens (override) and Cliffside booster pumps remain off (override). Hanapepe Wells A, B, and 25-1 remain on and PSV-2 remains open until Reservoir 212 reaches 211.71'.

PUMPS OFF = 211.71'

WEll A ON = 209.17

WEll B ON = 207.58'

WEll 25-1 ON = 207.5'

OPEN

i OFF

RESERVOIR 212 (0.5 MG)

OVERFLOW = 212' ! /-------., i / CLIFFSIDE \ L ____ -' BOOSTER , _______ .1...-__ -1

\ \ PUMPS / \~ ______ I

TO ZONES 1304,5,6,7

FIRE FLOW DEMAND 3000GPM

FIRE FLOW DEMAND OPERATIONS ZONES 1304,5,6, OR 1307 SCHEMATIC 4

Page 33

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

B. FLORA AND FAUNA

The project area has been previously cleared for sugarcane cultivation and ranching. There are no indications of rare or endangered flora or fauna in the project area. The stream in Kapahili Gulch is nonnally dry, and it is unlikely that any endangered or native stream fauna exist within the gulch. However, the new power lines may have a possible impact on the Newell's shearwater which is known to fly through the area. There have been documented occurrences of this bird colliding with human structures, especially power lines. Consequently, High Visibility Marker Balls were installed on the power lines to alert the shearwater of the above ground power lines.

C. ARCHEOLOGICAL FEATURES

According to an archaeologist from the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division, who conducted a field investigation of the project area on November 12, 1997, only one significant site was cited, a historic rock Wall, near the project area. The rock wall was cited approximately 80 feet south from the pipeline corridor in Kapahili Gulch. The rock wall is built against the western face of the gulch wall and is approximately 35 feet long and 20 feet high (see Figure 3).

Because the area surrounding the well site and the pipeline corridor has been cleared previously and the historic rock wall in the vicinity is away from the pipeline corridor, the project will have no effect on any significant archeological sites.

D. HYDROLOGY

1. Surface Water

There are inadequate data to state conclusively that the development of Hanapepe Well No.4 will have any measurable impact on the flow of Hanapepe River. The Department of Water will participate in a cooperative monitoring program by sharing infonnation from its facilities with the CWRM and United States Geological Survey (USGS).

2. Existing Wells

Based on the data collected during the aquifer test of April and May of 1993, it can be concluded that there will be very little impact from the sustained pumping of Hanapepe Well No.4. During the pump test, the observation well (Well No. 5634-01), which is approximately 1000 feet east of the Hanapepe Well No.4, not only showed no measurable influence from the pumping of the well but reflected regional downward trends before and after the testing period. Thus, any direct influence from the Hanapepe Well No.4 with other nearby wells is too small to be significant.

Page 34 Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development. Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

E. PUBUC FUNDS, ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

The project will involve the irretrievable commitment of public funds, electrical energy, and construction materials.

x. LIST OF PERMITS AND APPROVALS

The required approvals and permits for the project are:

~ Use Permit, County of Kauai, Planning Department

~ Building Permit, County of Kauai, Department of Public Works, Building Division

~ Pump Installation Permit, State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Commission on Water Resource Management

~ Stream Channel Alteration Permit, State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Commission on Water Resource Management

~ General GP95-oo2 Permit for Utility Lines In, Under, or Above Waters of the United States, Including Navigable Waters, in the State of Hawaii, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

~ Approval of a satisfactory Engineering Report complying with requirements set forth in Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 20, Section 11-20-29 by the Director of the Department of Health.

~ Hawaii Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), and associated Title 11, Chapter 200, HAR)

~ Commission on Persons with Disabilities

Fukunaga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Page 35

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well Development, Transmission and Appurtenances Engineering Report

XI. REFERENCES

1. County of Kauai. Department of Public Works, Eleele Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion. Phase I. May 1993. Prepared by Fukunaga and Associates. Inc.

2. County of Kauai. Department of Water. Final Environmental Assessment for Hanapepe Well Development. Transmission and Appurtenances, March 1998. Prepared by Fukunaga and Associates. Inc.

3. County of Kauai. Department of Water, Technical Reference Document for the Kauai Water Use and Development Plan. January 1990. Prepared by R.M. Towill Corporation.

4. State of Hawaii, Commission on Water Resource Management. Department of Land and Natural Resources. State Water Resources Protection Plan. Vol. 1& n. June 1990. Prepared by George A.L. Yuen & Associates. Inc.

5. Stearns. Harold T .• Geology of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin 8. Division of Hydrography. 1967.

6. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey. Islands of Kauai. Oahu. Maui. Molokai. and Lanai. State of Hawaii. August 1972.

7. University of Hawaii. Department of Geography. Atlas of Hawaii. Second Edition. University of Hawaii Press. 1983.

FukuruJga & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers June 2000

Page 36

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPEND~A:

:&a.n..a.pepe ~ell No. 4: As-b"Uil.-ts a.n..dAquif"er Report

I I I I I I Hanapepe Well #4

I State Well No. 5634-02

I AS BUILT AND

./ ...;;.....,

AQUIFER REPORT

I I

Febr_uary 1994

I Prepared by

I i WAIMEA WATER SERVICES

I I and

I ISLAND RESOURCES LTD.

I

11

I I I A-1

.• 0\ ! 1

! - .I

:

_l

I J

I \

_I

Hanapepe Well #4 .

, State Well No. 5634-02

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PUMPING/AQUIFER TEST REPORT

LOCATION MAP Figure 1

AS-BUlL T WELL SECTION Figure 2 .,

PUMPING TEST DATA Figure 3

USGS OBSERVATION WELL CHARTS Figure 4

GEOLOGIC LOG Figure 5

RAINFALL DATA Figure 6

A- 2

....:....,

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I

DRllLlNG/AQUIFER REPORT

Hanapepe Well #4 State Well No. 5634-02

AS BUilT AND AQUIFER REPORT

The Hanapepe Well #4 (location noted on map in Figure #1) is intended to supply up to 720,000 gallons per day (gpd) (500 GPM) for purposes of potabl.~. use. The well was funded by the State of Hawaii and the owner is Kauai Departmenf'ofWater. The well permit was applied for on 20 Feb 92. The permit was approved by the State of Hawaii, Department of land and Natural Resources; Commission on Water Resource Management on 27 April 92. The State Well Number assigned was.5634-02. Roscoe Moss Hawaii was the drilling contractor.

The Notice to Proceed was issued on 10 Aug 92. After site grading by Olokele Sugar Plantation, drilling of the 20 inch hole commenced 28 Aug 92. Hurricane Iniki hit the site in September 1992 and delayed the job. Drilling commenced again on 9 Oct 92. 28 days were added to the Contract. Water was first struck at a depth of about 443 feet (+ 19' elev.). As the hole was deepened to (-40' elev.) the water level remained at +19' elevation. The well was cased by 12 Feb 93 and grouting of the annulus completed by 24 Feb 93. Drilling of the 13" open hole went to 66' (-106' elev). At a depth of 530' to 568' porous and permeable lavas were penetrated and water samples showed an increase in chlorides from about 125 to 155 mg/I and drilling ceased.

The well was built as described in the as-built drawing in Figure #2.

A- 3

_l

,. ;

I !

. i

. I

~J

n u

, I :.-.J

"-1

i ~.

J

A long term pumping test was conducted from 26 Aprif 93 to 4 May 93 for 200 hours at 600 gpm. The test information is found in Figure #3. ;

The USGS well located" 1100 feet away was used as an observation well during the test. Graphic results from the observation well are shown in Figure #4.

A geologic log of the well done by Glenn Bauer on the staff of the Division of Water and Land Development is contained in Figure #5.

Rain fall data was provided by the State DLNR for 1991,1992 and 1993 to determine any influence rainfall may have on the USGS well water level variatiorJ.~. These are found in Figure #6. . -j ..........

RESULTS

Based on the data enclosed and described above it was noted that the USGS well water level records corresponded directly with rain fall data from the Alexander Reservoir gage and the Eleele gage over the past 3 years. The water level in the USGS well varied up to 1.58 feet over the 3 year period. In both 1992 and 1993 the first 5 to 6 months showed a steadily declining water level. The pumping test occurred in April of 1993 during one of these declines (see chart in Figure #4)

The water level in the USGS well was on a decline when the pumping test for the Hanapepe Well #4 was conducted and showed that the basic pattern of the water level trend did not significantly change during the pumping test.

The Hanapepe Well #4 had an immediate (5 minutes) drawdown of 3 feet and after 200 hours (12,000 minutes) of pumping full recovery occurred within 3 minutes indicating that the water level in the aquifer did not significantly change due to the volume of water withdrawn (7,221,000 gallons) during the pumping test.

The data available from the USGS well is not adequate to perform more aquifer test calculations and analYSis. The declining water level and the fact that the data was not detailed enough to identify any influence in the decline and the time the influence may have impacted the USGS weH restricts other analYSis.

A-4

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I ...

I I I I I I

Based on the results it can be safely concluded that the aquifer can readily be pumped at a continuous rate of 600 gpm for extended periods with;little or no change in water level or quality. Chlorides during the pumping test remained consistently at about 105 to 110 mgll. During the specific capacity test the well did not exhibit a sensitivity to pumping rate.

Assuming that the 24 hour pumping volume during the aquifer test was 864,000 gallons per day (gpd) and that there was no sensitivity to pumping rates during the specific capacity test, it would be reasonable to expect a yield of about 1 million gallons per day (MGD) without experiencing a significant raise in salinity. Should the well be pumped for 16 hours at a rate of 1000 gpm, the total would be equivalent to 0.96 MGD. This should prove to be an acceptable pumping rate, providing that an aquifer test of about f7'O hours is conducted upon the installation of the permanent pump. This would result in the final operating schedule for the pump.

A-5

I I I

LOCATION MAP I #1

I .. I

I I

·1 .;.;;:.....,

I I

.- . I l i

I 1 I ...

i :

U I r-~!

LJ I ;

I I .....

I --.J I

!

iJ I A-6 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1

I I I I I I

Barking Sands

PROJECT SITE

LOCATION . MAP

K A U A

Makahuena Pt.

A-7

Anahola

NORTH NO SCALE

I I I I AS-BUILT OF WELL

#2

I I I I

-I ....:..~

I I I I I I ,I

'I I I I A- 9

DEPTHS

0'

443 I

50 2'

568 ' . ,

_.1

J

--0 WATrR LtvE:L

66' OF'

HANAPEPE WELL 14 3/19/93

" :f " .:/ .;

.< ".

.1 "" .;':'

" .j .; . .f .... :i l ""

" .j , :1"

:i ... " .{ ,"

.• :t .; .. "" 1 "" ~ ,

l .; .~ ... .

" .< " } .; -"" ." , .;

... ""

13" OPtN HOLE:

A - 10

WillS NOT TO SCALE:

ELEVATIONS

462 ' E:LE:V. +/-

14" IO CASING

CiAO UiI: D ANNIJLIJS

213" HOLE

.j ~....,

- +19 ' E:L!:V.

-48 tLCV •

-106 ELtv •

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 1- I

I I I I PUMPING TEST DATA

#3

I I I I .. 1 -.;:;-.,

I I I I I

·1

I 1

I I I I I I A - 11

. !

- , ,

. t

.i

- 'I

, j

J J J

To: Raymond Sato ( Keith Fujimoto Mel Matsumura Greg Fujikawa

Fr: John Stubbart

waimea waEerlferVlcef -....... . sur.~ Inc.

Re: Hanapepe Well #4 Pumping Test Information

Date: 10 May 93

The Hanapepe Well #4 was pump tested to gather data on the quality and quantity performance of the resource. It was determined, based on the data, that the well could be completed to pump a minimum of 864,000 gallons per day of potable quality water.

Water level above sea level Airline - static water level Drawdown (max) Pump gpm (ave) Total gallons pumped (approx.) Electrical conductance Temperature Chlorides (the above are field measurements)

19' 16 3.46 600 7,221,000 729 to 582 23.5 to 26.5 125 to 100

psi feet gpm gallons microsiemans C mgtl

Pumping of well was started at ,6:00 am, 26 Apr 93, and was concluded at 2:00 pm, 4 May 93. This was a total of 200 hours or 12,000 minutes. The total pumped was 7,221,000 gallons. This equals an average pump rate of 601.75 gallons per minute.

- .' / ;; cc: Nishimura, Bauer, Runnells, DC ."

P.O. Box 326 • Kamuela. Hawaii96743 • (808)885-5941 • FAX (808) 885-7851 A- 12

FIGURE 4

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I "1

I

• !

I ::1

I I I I I I

Hanapepe Well #4 Pump Test - 600 gpm - 26 Apr to 4 May

;> 11.00 ........... j. Ad'ustin um in rate .... ·i ...... j .... t·"j·t·tttt .......... ·( .. ·j Stop pumping .. )·tt

] ~

-.J

~ nco I I

100 10000

10 1000 100000

Time in Minutes

I ~ Water Level -e- Start Water Level

A - 13

I Hanapepe Well 14 Well Pumping Test P.1 I WELL GRAPHS STATIC WATER LEVEL = + 19' ELEV.

I PUMP INLET = -26' ELEV. HANAPEPE #4 o = 16.0 PSI PUMP SUMMARY GROUND ELEV. = 462' ELEV. 4/26/93 TO 5/4/93 AIRLINE = -21' ELEV. I TIME OF DAY ELEV. USGS USGS

MIN GPM D RAWD OWN DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN DEPTHS D.D

I FEET FEET PSI FEET Elev.453' 0 19 16 0 0

,- ' 1 420 3.0 16.0 14.7 0 0 I :::.:: 2 420 1.6 17.4 15.3 3 550 2.8 16.2 14.8 4 550 2.8 16.2 14.8 I 5 580 3.0 16.0 14.7 6 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 7 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

I 8 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 9 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 ... ;;;~ -J

10 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 20 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 I 30 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 40 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 50 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 I 60 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 70 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

1 80 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

I 90 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 __ . .1

100 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 200 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 300 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 I 400 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 500 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

1 600 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 I I ;;;"J 700 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

800 600 3.0 16.0 14.7 --'I 900 600 3.0 16.0 14.7

I :i.:.J 1000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6 2000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

.. I 3000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

" J 4000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6 I 5000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

J 6000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

-7000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6 I 8000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6 9000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

J 10000 600 3.2 15.8 14.6

I J I J A- 14 I

I I WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 1

I I

TIME

ELAPSED TIME~MIN.

.a--'iMl 1~'"

I I I I I I I I 1

':~1 ~ 0

;

I I I I' I I

l

---

"

- HOURS 1

-

... --_. . ~j~DN\ 2

~.oo 3 ,.

1rr:D° 4

5 U:o O· -11.'0 06

, 6'M ., t:OO

7

IV~J

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 80 85 90 95

100 120

180

240

300

360

420

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC . . WELL NAME_---:...:../-{AN..:£..~' :...l..f-I~~~~ __ d:h--L.<f---DATE ___ 4H~=-+-J~~ ____ _ DRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TEMP. PSI FT • READING GPM

\1.,0 !Wt1' I 00 660 START 14,1 I \

I~,~ _Li2..o Iq Ii c:-~

11'1 ,t 1~,1 ,'t;8 S"Ro 7J!1 2-'1.(7 14_i '3,0 (,. 00 -'7 " 11 '3 1<#.1 (..00 1."!(~ Ill,. i 1_24 2.~,3

'\Ii .J -.;;:~

II( ,"I c,<rb 'll.{ 2,.;,3 ; (ft, '7 G.d'O 72..1 K lUi 2.~ j

(.(" ~t:>o "q "2..~.Q

11f17 !bOO ',2.0 2.22

11't,l I Itt.' _fI,cro lLJ-: 2.2..,

"

t'{ 1 ),0 11 ~F1'00tI ~ "'70" 11.7."l. ,

'4" ~oo 1 70S' '2. ~ .-:s

r II -"l ~oQ 7D4 L.b_'"1

IILti7 ~(o LDO [:Too 1., 120 :2.; 4

'~.1 (000 ~q1 2 . .'r 12.0 '2~.5'"

l"t· i t-l\ '2..~.~ L:,Oo '-~~ \-t 0

14" '4.4 "Z.:~ • ") (000 "'V~ \"to

., -I Lf·1 --'" i5·l--~OO 10''1 {2 j

/1.(' 1 ~bS '1.'!;-

-:z 50 9 "o0 It.~

, y:1 fJOO (P CcLj 'Z..~ 21o,b . (z.~

REMARKS

l..LM-A. DIrl

t.u~ '-U,A..\..

-

-----.-

.----_.-

-

-;

,;

J •. 1

I

. I

J J J I

-!

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 2

'I!IME ELAPSED TIME-MIN

'2.',00 8 480

1, co 9 540

\{: 00 10 600

{' ~ 0 {) 11 660

c,',oo 12 720

7:00 13 780

r(:oO 14 840

9:Do 15 900

/o:Wo (\Cf\ ......

-/f:W 17 11020

(1.:00 18 1080

1:00 19 1140

"2..:00 20 120Q

3:00 21 1260

'F'.~ 22 1320

0':00 23 1380

~'.j • ® VIa;.. 1440 .

1:190 25 1500 r ~:OO 26 1560

I

9:00 27 1620

/.D~OO 28 ~680 ...

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME HAMA-p£pe t;t: 4

DATE 4/'Z.~ /q ~ 4/2 7/9."!J ~ r ~ I

~

DRAWDOWN METER'~ ::.'~FLOW EC. CHL. PSI FT. READING 'GPM

f&,(PS -z.';

/4.1 foOO IZ-5

14.7 6bD ').,5 (P~Q /1~

1'1. 7 (poO bSl 2..'1 I'l-U

11.(''1 bS'la ,.."1

(POQ /'Z.D

1~.7 (,00 ~C".s .:.;:;...., ....

"

1'/·1 foOD "S"~ .. ~ .

&6~ .

I c.f. loS IbS~ .

:-.

IV-I, ~cCJ 11059 ., I'f. C, ! (/100 . ~ r;; r;, IC{. C r"OO ,~{

IL/,~ VJ()(} c,r-y JY.~ (OW los()

I<{.(p coO ,51 tc.f.b mCO ,,~O

Ilf·" ~oO ~ '-{q

1«.0 ?,(J) r,l/8 ,4·" ~OO ~L{o/ -('i,v

(000 \,pLfl -14'(P (;OD ~I..\l

t4'~ ~OO \D\{O

L"t, C# (gOO ("L\'Z..

A· 16

TEMP.

'lz]'}

'L5'~

'Lt,P '0

"Z...~.I

LS.~

<-"1.1 1- '1.3

13·7 '2..),1

V5: '-I

v,;. z. ·l3·¥

"" 'L'3.7 '23. 7 1. 3.& 11:>.7

2..-3·Y 'L~' .,

1.'-\ • 5'

'Z..~' "\

"Z.. 1..\' S'"

REMARKS

I , I I

1

I

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 3 3

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME ±-ifu,J ~ ~£-DATE _________________ ~ , __________ ___

TIME ELAPSED DRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CEL. TEMP. REMARKS TIME:"MIN PSI FT. READING GPM

~oo %0 1.'1.5' //.'00 29 1740 Ilf' '" !~ ~~(p T

('1' v 'l.~ -z..u.' -S-rz.:()Of7M 3O 1800 bOO Co~l

':00 31 1860 It.{·~ (pOO ~~i> ~ t. '5'" ·1

32 1920 1'I·f{J '2..\

~ S'. \ 'l.- :0'0 t.t;,OO to -;0 -.;;;:;...,

33 1980 N·lJ:> (pOO (p~'2.. 1.\ '2.~.:;

"3 : 0-0 'Z.\

]..~.:J.. 1I:00 34 2040 '14' i.D &;,00 Co~

~:oo 35 2100 J'j'VI {DOb <o~t> I'l.\ 1..5· ~ 't.\ -v.

-(,! 00 36 2160 ,~.Io taOo ~"-1 "l.S" S--37 2220 J~. P bOO bZ,<-; "t.~ z..S,'Z-

-~<?p

_&f:..f1? 38 2280 Iq.(p (POO Cp30 -'" '"L L'l.3 .

ct·.~ 39 2340 I <./. fP bOO 03r L-L 2-3. ~ ---lO! 0-0 40 2400 1(/.('1 Ic,OC) ~31 z..,.L 1.5·) - .-.

Il:O-u 41 2460 I <I. [P bOC) (033 2...z.. ?..3.~

1'1. '. 0 0 A/I142 2520

1/4·~ IoOU (030 t,...'L 1.).1.. - -_.

l !DO 43 2580 I YJ 0 ~,(t) ((731 't."2.. 2 :;. ~ , _. -

z..3.~ '2.' () 1) 44 2640 a Y·(, foOD :a~<.f 't-L .. .. - -- -

"\ '00 45 2700 II tf. ~ Cr!)o {;J If 2.t.. ,:; . (/ .

'1!OO 46 2760 I tI. (, I(IJ 09 lh30 "'Z...L.. 2 .. :r~

I

6')00 47 2820 Ilf.~ 1;/1 oD <P3L L~ 23·)

~t?.@ 2880 I<{. ~ _ .teD 1(0 'Z,q 2."L Z~·O c..\.Oo - ."

A- 17

,.

. ;

,.1

'1 \

_I

'"

i .:J

~'1

J

'-1

J J J , i -i

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 4

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME ~ DATE __________________ ~------------

TIME ELAPSED DRAW DOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TIME'-MIN. PSI FT. READING GPM

1:00 49 2940 l'f"b f.L,oo ,.1-l. "Z .. :t.

g,OD 50 3000 14·1&> Coo 0 Co z.4J ~"L-

l'f"~ ,=,'2-7 l.~

9:00 51 3060 0,00 I ~l..

/0:00 52 3120 1,(,,14 (,000 ~"'Z..o

II: OD 53 3180 14" &J {,a 00 <"l~ -/ -z...lii-~.

/ 2: 00(11'1 5 4 1l.f"CP 1.."'-

3240 (000 tG\'\

55 3300 iJ,(" to (PDQ L,;,15 't.~

/:00 56 3360 11.f" 10

'2,."1-

2-:0D ~DO .. UI \'\

3:Q?57 3420 "L"t..

ly,,\JJ ~OQ ~Il.\ - "z .. :'l. C£.:cr~ 58 3480 14"lp C:,DO c.t"l

~:Ov. 59 3540 /'1' (p LoolS'" ~'l..

(goo

,:VO 60 3600 It{" ,. t,DO (,pt4 :1."7..

, 7:00 61 3660 1<./,,((, ~DO b1h 2L

J/: CJZ> 62 3720 I r.r. ~ cPOO ~Iq -z...",

9,,~oo 63 3780 114,,~ (pOQ (Plf, 2.."2-,

10:00 64 3840 It/"ft; foOD ~ll t.L II :00 65 3900 14,,(P ft,VO f.o I q -L"L

'-

/ "? : 00 6"6 Nt 3960

i tI"c, 600 ~l'1 'Z.."Z.

/ :(fX) 67 4020 14,6 ~oo ~\1 ?"'1

?~. 00 68 4080

IY,,~ wt,OO (PI ~ 'L'-I

.::r,' 00 69 4140 L4 .. ~ CbOC . (.D\(, I""'f.."-t..,, -

A - 18

TEMP.

t.7"~ 'Z.~,,4,

1.,:>,,~

"Z-'-t"~

'2.5" CD

~C;" -r '2..'5,,<;;,

2.~"l.-

l..S" (p

1.S"''' ~

'2..~:9.

2.5"" S-

z.c..f.g

2'-1,,1-

"Z. \.f" I

"L \.{ " "(.

z..S· or 12b, b

"'1"3,,S" "'2..:.>., ,-:3" Lf

REMARKS

I

,

I I ~I

I

I

I

I

I

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 5

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

I I I I WELL NAME ~z;.,..~£-.

DATE __________________ ~------------

I I I

TIME

y:oO 70

S:OV 71

ELAPSED DRAWDOWN TIME"-MIN.PSI FT.

4200 1'-f.G,

4260 Il{.~

~ I ~ ~t.J @ 4320

14·&

I I I I I I ,

I I • I I

,:00 73

~'.Go 74

'1:00 75

(o:oC) 76

If: 0077

rv. (J)78

/.'0 00 75

'2.-: 00 80

:<,: ()O 81

4~OO 82

~:oo 83

":00 84

'7~OO 85

(:co 8.6

q:OO 87

o t(): DO 88

11:00 89

4380 II(' (P

4440 14·9

4500 14'~

4560 II.(' ~

4620 ''I' t...

4680 14'~

4740 ''i,e.-

4800 Il{'fo

4860 fL.f,t

4920 1'1' (p

4980 14 ,("

5040 14. 16 ,

5100 ( f,/. ,

5160 I '-t. ~ 5220 I~.~ 5280 It/,~

5340 It/."

METER FLOW EC. CHL. READING GPM

LOD ~/{p '--"2.-

_~OO {p (g "2,...L

CoOD ~{7 't..:z...

~oo c,l~ ~~

~

tD 00 (p\.\J> t.2-

(ooe {a 1"3 'l~

~'Z.

(000 G,OC\ w/O ... ",..

{pDQ .~

(eli 0 "'1,. .....

(,00

u,O~ Z'1.

(,pOO 2,l-

(Quo t. 0-"

.,!"I.-

a, Do ~oLf

(&)00 1.1"\...

<00'"\ '2,"Z-

(pOO ~o;-'2.'2.

(,QOO (p040

(nO G (01'- 7,.1-

~OO ~/O 1 .. :t

\000 ~Ol 'l.c..

o t_~·(iO fpO~ 7.1..-

~.£eOJ 0D9 2.-1..

A - 19

§'

TEMP. REMARKS

',:5·7

'2.-3. (..

02.3· r '2..;" CO

t--,.7

1..y.~

'Z.. S' ' '0

1.. G',-z..

1-6. 1

2.~.~

2.5' (p

~S,rp

Z~·~

'Z.';' l

1..\.\'~

'7-'-f. S-

1..L.fG

'L.\.{. ~

"t'-t.L

1J-{.,

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 6

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME bhm~~~ . DATE __________________ ~-------------

TIME ELAPSED DRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TEMP. TIME~MIN PSI FT. READING GPM

i"' ••.•• , 11..,~ 0090 5400 14.ft, foOD ~1(J 'L'"L 1-'-/. I

1'.00 91 5460 1't~0, (POO (;CJY "l-t.. '-.\.f"L

1..: 00 92 5520 II'-I·~ (000 ~/O "2.~ "t..\(. I

1:00 93 5580 'Y.(p (I) ()O wI I 'z.:t.. <"'-{.?

\.[: 00 94 5640 14,~ Wo (POG -tb 7.~:i, "L

S':€XJ 95 5700 (t.{.f.o <,00 {p06 Z-z.. ?,...c..{. L{ .If -W- 5760 Itf·(, "00 1(011 l..L "Li."?>

97 5820 It/·r..:, £DOC ~'''\ "1."'-

'2..,-\,0 00

--. ~ : • I

i -

~:OV 98 5880 -z.z- ~.i /q'i' v Oo "D~ q:OO 99 5940 1'-#' S"

(oo~ z...'- 2"1,1 CoD 0 ~

-- , , j

10 : 00 100 6000 14·(0 2,.."1.

'Z...4'l.P <.a 0 0 ('o?J

{(:C010l 6060 1'1' Co ~DO <aD=' L,."l. 1...S" ~

(1..-: Dol 0 2 6120 I'/" to ~oo ~-

(qO"L z...~.t.t

,.,00 103 6180 ~':l; 'l.."f" ~ I"'·e. u- OO ~"l\

-z.,: 00 104 6240 {L(' f..p ",'10.

'2.,,5·~ G:,DO 5'Q'\ • L!

3'.00 105 6300 . ~,~

2."1-z5"·1 1'1' I.D (.,(.)0

l/~OO106 6360 ~" 'l."Z.. '2..$,1 I'I' VJ ~Ol.J

\ ... 1

S'"! 00101 6420 /4,<1 (aOO 600 ;Z.-z... ~'"\ '~

{,..!OO 108 6480 ILf't.P (p00 6'""9~ 1.2- 2.5' :3

--.-l 7=00109 6540 14.~ (,,00 ilnOt. "Z,."'t. "t.. ~. s"

;j ,<t!C011O 6600 'l~'~ (000 I{pf)~ ~'1.- "'Vi·V

. I I

A- 20

REMARKS

I I k

I I

I

~

I I I I

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 7

I I I I I I I

TIME

q:00111

10: 00112

/I: 00113

/1..,:,00 14

I: 00 115

-z.,: 001 16

3~ 00117

(.foo 118

5'.00 119

• 5Iff. .S" @) 7:00 121

I I I I I t I

?J:Dt) 122

q:00123

10:00124

11:00 125

(1-:0d26

I: O{) 127

~~eo 128

3,'.00 129

\.f:c?0l30

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME. __ ±kw~~~~~....;:;" ;" '-=~=--__ _

DATE ______________ ~-----------

ELAPSED IDRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TEMP. TIME'-MIN. IPSI FT. READING GPM

6660 14.' ~OO ~o3 "i"t-

iii!. 2,3·9 6720 15/.C bOO ~o l ~ 1..3.7 I~.

6780 /4.fn "00 b01.-~ U.S-

6840 J~·fo '00 001 'k1..- "2.3.'

6900 IY·" &00 {"oro 'Z-'L- -z;3.~

6960 I~'b beD ~oct "2..'t- ;z3.7 7020 ILl .~ I~oo (pbS "2.,.. "t..- 1.3·9 7080 I 'I:.~ &CO CeID "L. "'- 'B.ep 7140 14," hCf) IGob 7 "'1,..,- 1,3. <6 7200 It If.~ ~dO ~Ir ~~ 7J3.f 7260 6G'Q)

'l.."-23'1 /t{.f.I (poo

7320 t'f ,(p l&,)OO "Z-1...

'Z '-\. • :, 59(a 7380 ILt·1" ~oc. ~~'\

z..c.. 'Z..~'~

S<tS-L'Z..

1...4·~ 7440 114'~ f.::,cC

7500 I '1'~ '2.'Z-

1..1..\.' i, tot)O ~6 ,

7560 '4'~ tt:'~ 0 ',.:z_

%.5" (,p taCO

7620 1'1'1,p taO 0 5~~ Z.."

2S'~

IlI'(.o S"~ 2. 'l-"L

7680 ~oa 'Z. <. c10

,It· " ~~, l.V

2.1,p."V 7740 {,Or;

7800 /l(.1tI ~o(> !'q-\ rt.~ "2.5. '2.-

A- 21

7

REMARKS

.

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 8

"

--~

I i __ J

-j

1 ~

, !

. I

TIME ELAPSED TIME:"MIN

(:'00131 7860

c,: 00 132 7920

7: 00 133 7980

X~OV134 8040

Cf:OOJ.35 8100

10:00136 8160

II :OV 137 8220

12:0r:;138 8280

1:00139 8340

z.-:OO140 8400

]:00141 8460

c.j: 00 142 8520

~:C0143 8580

. sC(.tl' !' I Co L~;

(,,-144 ) 8640

;': I _.1

: I ;....]

J J

7:00 145 8700

~:Da146 8760

ct: Ct)147 8820

'O!OO 148 8880

)1:00 149 8940

rvo015O 9000

,..1:6>0151 9060

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

WELL NAME ~'fi:L DATE __________________ ~ __________ __

DRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TEMP. PSI FT. READING GPM

14'~ (poo 5'\Vi> 'J,."V-1..,-\,1.P

I~'~ (000 5"~ ~'t,.. 1..1.\,3

Il./. fo ~()D S9f6 '"2.1... 2. '4." l<f.ro 1000 S"99 ~ "Z-Y.1

,

~t90 (pOt:) ~)

'"L3.'j Ilf·0 -z...

Ir..{. b rovo ~C,7 "'2..( 2..3.8'

,U.(p (0,90 59(, 'Z...t 1,3-7

IY·6 (.rOo S9S' 1....l u.L , l{. C, fo()O r'i7 'J \ 't~.'l

14." ftOO S"'"'1G' 1..1 ZJ.Y '''l.~ 1000 ~q '1..' '2.3.

Ir.{., bOO S-C,l l..l ;). 1.:y i~.~ row (pOl 1..\ ~.~

l~." "CO (g{)~ "2..l V·V; 14'~ <000 s,~

2.1 ,:~ • \.f' ,

1.4 l'i • t5 l#oQ 'S"~, 2JY''1l

.... S-ctt..-

~\

'L'1,1'C ( 'to. ~ <..DOO

ICot .~ 'U

t.>--'t •5 ~ao S-ct'" .- u '2.'-\ • 1 ,4'!) <.000 5~ l."

Ilf·v 1~9.l 't.L

'1 .. S'· \ taOO

t'\.c. ~Oo 5"c:t'L IUo

z.5·~

A- 22

REMARKS

,

I I

81 I

I

I

I

I I I I I I I­I I I I

I

I I I I

~ I ~~c

I • •

WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE 9

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

mLL Nrum ____ +~~~~~~~~~~------DATE ______________ ~~---------

TIME ELAPSED DRAWDOWN METER FLOW EC. CHL. TEMP. REMARKS TIME:"MIN. PSI FT. READING GPM

.,..~QO 152 9 t20 ;4,10 (00 0 ~~~ ~ CIS 1:7,1

~'.OQ 153 9180 1l.{'(P (pOO S~'2. 'U

1.5""

4:00 154 9240 lo°O "2.\ 1.(0:0 ILt· (p 5~1

155 9300 '\..\ '),.16'. :3 ~:bO ILf,(g (pOt) S'"4,C\ .....:;~ -,

~~OO156 9360 c:;q? .. ,

1.5-1 l'f'r.- (pO 0

,:00157 9420 t 1/., ~()() ~qt.f ""2,..( z..~. '1 . 158 9480 I'I·fL (POD 5"'13 "2.( z. '1."1 4b~OO

C\'.OO159 9540 1'1. ~ ~f)O 6'cts 'Lt Z-,-/.l/ tO~oJ60 9600 I'I·S fJJOO ~q<.{ '2.t L"{,7

IlItoo 161 9660 1'1. ') ~OD ~93 L( ~4.3

12. ~OO l!2 9720 ILir f(JOO ~q~ '"Ll '2-'/. '2...

/:00 163 9780 14.S mOO ~7 "'t..\ 1., \.f., ~'.OD164 9840 '4:~ (,,(}o r9~ Ll 1,.. ~,'f

c,'.oo 165 9900

c,()O {'"q~ ~l 7..H.~

Lf! ~o 166 9960 t InDO ~'ir '2;l -z.. ""/. i --

b'lOo167 10020 (PCO ~~7 .-z.,L 2'-{. q a·7 l"~ t~l>~ (RfX) 01t u ~c.[. r-'7'.00 1<- q ''to S" £#00 S'~,

1.0\ '1.:"'1

6o~OO ["i 0 ILl'.;' 1000 (cOO I~ ~'-\ .1

'\,'.00 t 1 ( 1"1 .1' LooO 5ttS '2,\

1.-4 ·3

JI.l'~ 'L.~

LO~Qq..., 2- u Oo bOZo '1.,,\ • ~

Iii.. 5" (,.00 sq, %.1 ~'i .S IOOct, ;

l/2.10 cr '7 'f I~'S 1.o0fj cO"\ ~, 2-D,,,

J.'V I{ A- 23 l' '1..G'O 14fJD (,5 loDe...· (.gOl

l .-7fCJ ..!,~ s },''h''t ory~ '12>.51 ~ ~_ _ ~1.u::J ...... -.1. ,_ , ,cf,~ a9~ '1:~S

" 1 ,S-z., -:7 L'P~ \"2-

n. .;,1; , .... b .. ~~ ~,"",'t.

\~ cb.$P -~.hZ obS I""

\",,-"t ~~j ,"'t-

h,~t \-G

d)6s

I J'h'l \1, L I?..;.~ IJ '~'t. 11_ ijI;.$

~'~ 1'1. l-,,~-'

(}h"Z- \1_ 10 ry

b ·f?, 11. 8b..3

I ,'a 1'- L.,b -) (' C2. 11. 1b~

I h't.'?. 1'"1 thh..]

;'~'"2.. n Lb3

b'1:7- n dJJ:,j

) 'h? 1"'Z. A63 o 'j>"'Z. 'L lbS

p.w.~ ,-

\ ' '"'"1- ~'o.s I \'to

cr .. h'(.. 000") \"C.

,.So -h"1· L\:.S , ... b'S1,. b'P.5'

\"1'.

£ ,.s'Z.. [JOJ ->bS

S ~nrvw::aCi 'dW:aoL ''IH::l '::l:a

I

. Pl .. ';f - ~~ ... ',~ (jQtSJc cof7,ihlO ")' hI c>~'\.<?"~ I ClO~ 'o'll-

oo-c') " ,." f bb} c?o:1

<l00) .s ·~1 2 b 1 ClO (11

OOf1J S,h' 1-bl oo:" . oo~ c, ,hi "1 b ) Oo~ol \ - . ,; 00<1} ...s'''' 0

Sb 100',6 f/ol1J{ . ----r

00d) c.' hi 0 hh I Q.O'"

V

004") S,h' 0 -I- -£b\O<Y.I.-

~-CXJ'j ,..)'hl

0 -z: ~ } ~~l,~tt,l, 0))"

, ..s'hl 'r- I!,} ()Qi.9 0

000; j'hl 'r- Ob 1 00',t-, 0

00' ..5'~( 0 1:,.& 1 OQ~'i.

(J)Ot7J +- 2.2) 0°',2 S';,I 0

OO/? S'h' 0 l-

Lli 00:1

eGO) S'h' - '1 ~ J QO·i'Z,.l 0

000) S'h' 0 - S~ 1 00',"

CHi) ~ .s'hl I-

h.Q. )"o'1Q1 0

O()~ S'h' I-

~ -&1 Oo~'o ::>

cPf'1l

()(J'J .s 'hI 'r--

'Z & \ OO'I~ Q QO"}

... I--

~ ~ } 00;1-.s 'hI 0 I--~ loo:/T) aod> c: .. 1,1 0 -- - b LJoo:c, -00(7) .5 . ." 0

'-~L)Qo:h -ood) .5 ·hl 0

t-- LL..l oc:~ -00'" C;'r' 0 -- --J.. t-- 'iLl Qo',i ood) S,h' 0 •

Rd~ ~Nlmz:ali '.L~ ISd NIW-:ID-lI.L MO'I~ li:aoL:iIH NMOCIMVliO o:ascnn:a :aWloL

IDiiiN 'I'Im1

ot :a~~d WHO~ VoLVO ~NloLS:aoL 'I'IaM

r 1

o· ._.

i

, .

i !

. .. ~.~

I I I I I I I I I I

~ '!

I I I I j

I I I : I I

-WELL TESTING DATA FORM PAGE ~ 1\

WAIMEA WATER SERVICES INC.

::~ NAME Ft;:m~ TIME ELAPSED DRAWDOWN METER FLOW

TIME-MIN. PSI I FT. READING GPM

CRECOVERY .:2 2- ~JD f)"" 0 'U.h START

I ,- 1~ 2" (, .;

1 (. 0< 4 ~ 0 5 it> 'If .0 . ,

7 \',0 R . (,- .D Q (, ;i)

10 ~\,O 15 20 25 ~ 35 -40 45 50

HOURS 55 1 ''0

~ . '7n --2.5.

80 .~ ~'qO

q~ ,

100 2 120

-3 180

4 240

5 300

6 360

7 420

A- 25

II

EC. CHL. TEMP. REMARKS

.. -I ... .

-.-..

:-,

-

· , · , , · .

· i _I

- I

! i

;..j

- i !

-...J

USGS Observation WELL CHARTS #4

A- 26

I I I I I I I I

-J ...;;; .....

I I I I I I I I I I I

--.---------.. - -.-- - - - -'- - - - --

» I

IV -...t

17.00

+l

~ 17.60 r.c .S 17.40

...-I

& !l 17.20

m 17.00

~ ~ 16.00

~ ~ 16.60

en ~ 16.40

~

HANAPEPE WEll #4 USGS Well Water Levels

16.20 Iii iii iii iii i Ii I : I I : Ii: Iii i i : : : i i; i I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Jan 91 Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 92 Mar May Jul .. Sap Nov Jan 93 ~.<>r Un" 1 .. 1 C'ft~ ~Ift ..

Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb

Years and Mbnths Apr Jun Aug

)f( Water Level

L_ L .... _._: L"_: __ ~ L- .. ~ [:7''':~ ~ L __ ~ , ____ ",,{,. ::I: .. !

I 17.2

17.0 CJ > U) Z -...

l-t... 16.8

Z t-1

'" Z 0 ..... » l-t I

15.6

a: N > 00

W ..J W

16.4

16.2 2J

-:...~- - -

, · . '"

. , , '. . . . . , , . • •• I " ..... . ................................................ _ .... -.... _ .............. .. · . .. . . . . . . . · . . . . ... "

•••••••••••••• - ••••• - •••••••••••• ~- ............ a. .......... . · . . . .. . . · . , . , , , ,. · ·

· ··· .. · .. IT .... ' ••••• _ It I .............. . . , · " " ........................................... -................... _ ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . .. "

· · , · , . f . . · . . - . · . . . ... .

•••••••••••••••••• II ••••• • ........................ _ •••• _ ............ . · . . . . . . . . . . . " . . '" . " . . " . . " . :.. . · · : I : · . · , " ....... " " ....... " ... ...... '. '. " ... ....... " .. ....... . . , . ,

" ..,"', , ' ,

... .................. ............. _ .... -.... -.................................. . · , · I' . . . . · . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . ............ -.... -.... _ .......... . . . .. '. ..... '. .. . :~' :: i : · . ... . · . .. : : • ca.: i·' ~ 0 :... : Q :~ .

, ,. . :~

4 71 31 APRIL III II 12

L "TEST PERIOD um

215607159344301 2-563~-O~ W25 HANAPE INST9NTANEOUS ELEVATION (fI (NGVDl

Il It IS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- .---r-- ~

~\

- - - --. --. -. - - - - - - -17.2

17.0

CJ > C!) z -f-4 lL.. 16.8

Z .-...

z a to-4 16.6 i-cc > W --l W

16.4

16.2

,. . ... .. ... -.......... .. .. -... -.... -: ............. :-........... -:-- ............. -:-- ............ -: ................ -: .......... . o

o .. .. ... . ...................................... _ ...................... _ .................................. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. o 0 ,

............................ ....... -... . ........................................ -........... _ .............................. . o 0 : : -1. ..... ...L. : : .. :

o

o .... -- ...................... -............. .. ...... o

JAN

o , . ,

-USf 2·15607159344301 2-5634-01 W25 HANAPE INSTANTANEOUS E~EVATION (fT (NGVD}

OLe

- - -

I I I

GEOLOGIC LOG

I #5

I .'~-. I

I I .. .;,;;;~

I .. ,

I ;

I i

_. i

I : ..

I : .... : i

I r· l : •.. ;!

I i

I --J

I I ...J

J. I

A- 30 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

• !

I

• I

HANAPEPE WELL NO. 4 Geoloqic Loq

By Glenn Bauer

Depth Interval (ft.) Descr1ption

0-30

30-35

35-45

45-50

50-55

55-65

65-70

70-15

75-80

80-85

85-90

90-95

95-135

1.35-145

~45-170

170-180

180-190

A- 31

No sample collected

Mixture of red soil ~~d weathered basalt

No sample collected

Weathered gr~y aa

lo!ixture of dense brown aa and aoil

No sample collected

Dense gray aphyric aa .j .:.:;. ......

Same as a~ove, exoept a few brown aa fragments inoluded

Same as depth 65-70

Mixture ot brown-red soil ana qray aa

Very weathered basalt wit~ coating of Mn and Ti

Mixture of red aphyric pahoehoe and dense dark qray

,aphyric aa

Gray-brown clay containinq sand-size cuttings

Same as above, except roek cuttings ara larger

No sample collected

Dark ~ray aa, some cuttings conta~n white clay minerals in the vesioles

Mixture of gray-brown clay and dense dark gray aa

FIGURE 8

, \

~ • .J

. i I

~

J

190-200

200-205

205-2l0

210-215

215-.220

220"'225

225-230

230-240

240-250

250-2t50

260-280

280-290

290-300

300-305

305-3l0

A- 32

Mixture of qray-brown clay and weathered sand-size cuttinqs

Dense dark gray aa (larqe sample)--cuttings the same with gray-brown clay covering the cuttings

Slightly weathered pahoehoe ~ aa (1), soma white clay mineral present in the vesicles

Red-brown pahoehoe (1), white clay mineral present

Mixture of gray clay and sand­size cuttings

Same as above, except clay > auttinqs--cuttings appear weathered

Brown pahoeho.~ft th small round vesicles filled with white clay minerals

Same as above, except qray olay also present

Soil (1) with very weathered aa

Mixture of dark gray pahoehoe and dense aa--white and tan olay minerals fill pahoehoe vesicles

Same as above, exoept aa » pahoehoe

Dark gray aa containing fresh olivine phenocrysts 1.-2 :rem across

Gray pahoehoe with small vesicles, some filled with white clay minerals

same as above, except one fragment is vary sccriaoeous

Gray pahoehoe (?)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.. -1-11' :.J! '!..: f.' ~I"'t

I oJ .;; oj , "J' \J 1""1 , ,.,\oI ... n'-..... WYW vwv • __ ,~..--- -r

I 3~O-315 Sliqbt~y weathered liqht gray

pahoehoe transitional to aa

I 3~5-320 Gray pahoehoe with small vesicles, some filled with

I clay minerals

320-335 Dense medium gray aa

I 335-345 Dense gray aa with small olivine phenocrysts comprising between 15-20% of sample

I 345-350 Pense dark qray pahoehoe witb small olivine phenoorysts comprisinq about 5' of sample

I 350-355 Same as above, except pahoehoe is brown and sccriaceous

I 355-360 Dense dark qray pahoehoe transitional to aa with small (.5 mm) cliv!nephanocyrsts

I cOMPris1nq~t-P~rcent ot sample

360-365 Dense dark gray pahoehoe ~ith

I ollvine phenccyrsts oomprising about 15' of sample

365-370 same as above, except pahoehoe

I is transitional to aa

370-375 Gray-brown pahoehoe (?)

I 37!S-380 Mixture of large cuttings: 1) Denes aphyr1c pahoehoe 2) Brown as

I 3) Gray scoriaceous pahoehoe contain weathered olivine

phenocrysts, some 3 1111n

I across

4) Weathered aa with white clay minerals tilling vesicles

I 380-385 Mixture of brown ana dark gray sand-size cuttings

I 385-390 Mixture ot brown sand-size cuttinqs and dense gray aa

I 390-395 Dense dark gray pahoehoe

I I A- 33

.:-.

... : .

i·.·.·

I ~.J

395-400

400-405

405-410

410-4~5

415-425

425-445

445-450

450-455

455-460

A- 34

Same as above, except scme cuet1ngs are fine sand-size

Mixture of brown pahoehoe and dense gray aa, same aa fragments contain olivine phenocrysts up to 1 mm across

Sam~ as above, except pahoehoe is red-brown and scoriacaous

Dark gray aa (1), dense but coarse sand-size cuttings

Dense dark gray pahoehoe with minor olivine phenocrysts

Same as a~ove, except weathered and lighter gray in color

Mixture of red-brown and gray sand-size cutt1nqs--one larqe scor1aceous sa~le is intruded by chalcedony

Dark gray sand-size cuttings

Same as above, except minor olivine phenocyrsts are present

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I RAIN FALL DATA

#6

I I I I

.J .;.;;;~

I I I I I I I I I I I A- 35

(_____ L_

» Ul 0>

, L_. ___ ~_

20.00

19.00

1B.00

17.00

16.00

~ 15.00

~ 14.00 () 1aoo

..s 12.00

S 11.00 • 10.00

I 9.00

B.oo

7.00

6.00

6.00

4.00

aoo

2.00

1.00

HANAPEPE WEIL #4 Aquifer and Rainfall Data

0.00 1q:J iii iii j iii i * i :PP i T i j if iii , ~ i i ~ * i I Iii I Jan 91 Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 92 Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 93 Mar May Jul Sep Nov

Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Years and Months

17.B

..foJ Q)

17.6 Q) ~

17.4 Q

.1'"4

.-I

17.2 ~ ~ f..t

17 Q)

~ 16.8 ~

16.6 ~ UJ

16.4 (!:J UJ ~

16.2

1-)1( Rain-Alexander Re. B Rain-Eleele s USGS Well Water _J

-------------------

I

IRainfall Data ~APEPE WELL #4

QUIFER REPORT

MONTH GAGE GAGE USGS WELL

I Alexander Res. Eleele WATER LEVEL Accum In Accum.In. Accum.Ft.

IJan 91 0.4 0.12 17.4 Feb 4.3 4.7 1. 88 2 17.45 34.85 Mar 19.4 24.1 5.83 7.83 17.15 52

IAPr 8.85 32.95 2.26 10.09 16.9 68.9 May 3.9 36.85 0.67 10.76 17.1 86 Jun 9.6 46.45 1. 48 12.24 17.25 103.25 Jul 3.7 50.15 0.65 12.89 17.4 120.65

IAUg 9.9 60.05 1. 78 14.67 17.55 138.2 Sep 3.7 63.75 1. 03 15.7 17.6 155.8 Oct 11 74.75 5.32 21. 02 17.5 173.3

INOV 5.2 79.95 1. 08 22.1 17.5 190.8 Dec 12 91. 95 7.22 29.32 17.6 208.4 Jan 92 0 91. 95 0.82 30.14 17 . 7.15 ~26 .15 Feb 5.6 97.55 2.54 32.68 17.55 243.7

IMar 2.6 100.15 0.62 33.3 17.45 261.15 Apr 1 101.15 0.14 33.44 17.2 278.35 May 4.7 105.85 3.46 36.9 16.8 295.15

IJun 3.6 109.45 0.54 37.44· 16.8 311.95 Jul 3.6 113.05 1.17 38.61 16.75 328.7 Aug 3.9 116.95 0.68 39.29 16.75 345.45

Isep 6.9 123.85 6.37 45.66 16.6 362.05 Oct 4.8 128.65 3.59 49.25 16.75 378.8 Nov 4.1 132.75 1.7 50.95 16.7 395.5

. Dec 18.1 150.85 8.9 59.85 16.8 412.3 IJan 93 5.1 155.95 4.89 64.74 16.9 429.2

Feb 0.3 156.25 0.9 65.64 17 446.2 Mar 0.1 156.35 0.1 65.74 16.9 463.1

IAPr 1 157.35 0.74 66.48 16.8 479.9 May 1.7 159.05 1.15 67.63 16.6 496.5 Jun 0 159.05 0.46 68.09 16.45 512.95

IJUl 0 159.05 2.15 70.24 16.35 529.3 Aug 4 163.05 0.48 70.72 16.55 545.85 Sep 2.3 165.35 1.9 72.62 16.5 562.35

. Oct 7.3 172.65 3.89 76.51 16.4 578.75 INOV 4.4 177.05 1.27 77.78 16.4 595.15

Dec 16.°3 611.45

I I I I A- 37

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENX»IX :8:

Fi.n.a.l. Co:n.s-tructio:n. PIa.:n.s <selected sh.ee-ts)

ICY

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~-~ -~-----"--- ---

"'W"'.ATER QUAT .. ITY ..A.l..V"A.I.: .• iYSES :H:a.n..a.pepe "'W"'eIl25-I

I-

1\ 1 ~

I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ,-

r· ,

MONTGOMERY ~ES 555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 56S LABS (1 800 56S 5227)

, HANAPEPE WELL 25-1

Laboratory Report

for-

Kauai Water Department P.O. Box 1706

Lihue, HI 96766

Attention: Wayne Hinazumi

..... '

(:..

:::'. ,­.. -c· ~~

..

... .... _......... .. ~ ... ' . ' '

......

. "

"

• • . ~ .... :'.: _, ..: .',_ ~.~' .. : -=: ... ~:~ • .' ",I/:. .: •• ;',

I ',';; '., '., ' ":. . '. ~. -' ..,'.~... .. ,- .. ~ .~ " .' :~':"-~ :: ... ',.", . ':." -': ,~," :::.~?·J~~~::~::~;:~::.0:.r:ft:;~~E~: .. ~:~~;i::~~'~~~·" . - , .... _~.:_.: ....... ',.-':-; ;,:;,;~;;,~~",;':-~!..':' :.:.~:;:~.'~~~~;'."" .- .. !' ' . . ....

• : .,:":",,~,, .:. ~ •• M_

. .. ' • '," ~-:-.'; -.:';';'!' ....... .,:-:'! , "'\ . '.>

,; . .. '':.:- .":.... ...... '-:. -.~/ ... :. "'( ... :::';,. ... , "::~.-:-::. ,,:: . . \ :',

HrNDV 0 9 1995 Report#:" 23367

c - 22

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Kauai Water Department Wayne Hinazumi P.O. Box 1706 Lihue ,HI 96766

, - - ,- -' '--;-:'"'1 ., ...)

. - • ~ -,'C05 ... _.J ~ __ ltl __

Laboratory Fteport *23367

Sample Fteceived 06-oct-1995 15: 24: 26

Date Sampled 10/05/95

Sample* 951006046 Location: HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Parameter

Pesticides (ML/EPA 508) Toxaphene PCS's

ug/l ug/1

Result

NO NO

MOL

0.50 0.10

3 O.~;;; ...... ·1..,

Herbicides/Chlorinated Acids in Water (ML/EPA 515,1) 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) :, -4-0 .a 1 apon (qua 1 i tat i vel

- Oinoseb Pentachlorophenol Picloram

ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l

NO NO NO NO NO NO

0.20 0.10 1 0.20 0.0-40 0.10

50 70 200 7 1 500

Prepared Analyzed

10/10/95 10/24/95 10/10/95 10/24/95

10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10./12/95 11/03/95

Semivolatiles/Synthetic Organics in Water (ML/EPA 525.2) Benzo (a)pyrene ug/l Oi-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/l Oi (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/l

Endothall in Water (ML/EPA 548.1) Endothall ug/l

DiQuat in Water (ML/EPA 549.1) Oiquat ug/l

NO NO NO

NO

NO

Dioxin (2,3,7, 8-TCDD) in Water (ML/EPA 1613) 2, 3, 7, B - Dioxin Picograms/L NO

Cyanide in Water (ML/SM 4500 CN-F) Cyanide mg/l NO

0.020 0.60 0.60

5

0.40

1

0.025

0.2 400 6

iCO

20

30

0.2

10/12/95 10/18/95 10/12/95 10/18/95 10/12/95 10/18/95

10/11/95 10/13/95

10/11/95 10/16/95

10/13/95 10/17/95

10/17/95

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

<ONO.9!512015 1~-noY-199!5 13: ~5: 41 C - 23 Mon~go .. ry Matson ~aDoratorl.' I

1--I I I 1 1 1 1 1-I I I I I I

1

~ I I

--{

Group Validation Comments

Result for TCDD analysis submitted by Quanterra Environmenta 1 Services. (508) Low recovery for chlorothalonil, high recoveries for

DDT and methoxychlor on continuing calibration standards; chlrothalonil reported as NA. Reference QIR~GC-95-~89.

c - 24

()

I'.) 01

-

<fIr~ DNlliOMERY LABORATQRIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 lABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample' 951006046 Sample 10 HANAPBPB VALL BY 404-0J7 Project ~P~HA~S=EV~ ____ _

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Sample Type ~ Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-1995 Lihue , HI 96766

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

Parameter unite Result Cone. tRee Dilution Det.Limit Prepared By Analyzed

li~~il~f~~~1i~~11~~~f~]i!~~f~I~5~~~i~~~ij'li~~fit~*1~~f~~t~~i~llflli~~~ili~t~t[~ll~wltiii~~lrtl~

Report .: 2JJ67

73

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

)

By

- -

I I-'! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

J .. ~

I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

S55 East Walnut Street Pasadena, Califomia 91101 8185686400; FAX B18 568 6324:

Laboratory Adport

1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample # 9510060" Sample ID HANAPEPB VALLEY '0'-OJ7

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

A'I"I'N. Wayne Hinazumi

Project PHASEV

96766

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r ____ _ Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 ~Reported OB-nov-1995

Control Parameter

Single Determination Analytes Quality Control

Actual

~ ';~ 'j~' ~ Pound

MBLX Cyanide mg/l NO NO

"'Recv

!W~~~~~,o'~,*>z.~~mrJ::iRWr~»:~g~~~~w,*,,:;:><'~'%.:~:~~~~:~~':¢:t~;,<t:~~'m"'~ ~~~».!J~!:T:mW~~~:-.~~1t~v~;.) . "~~~~~:~.jg~.I!t'.:!l~::J..~~:g~$~ MSD Cyanide mg/l 0.10 0.0868 87

!~~lmfmtfuNiWl%-~~WJ __ !J.!~Milll&W~lI~~]lrftJ.m[f~~ _~_if.1¥~'b~ril_~1*UiUffi~W1ilW'~Jla1m;tri!1]

Report I. 23367

c - 26

(")

-

8',- NTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 lABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample' 951006046 Sample ID HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037 Project PHASBV

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Diquat and Paraquat (ML/EPA 549.1 )

Report I: 23367

75

- - - - - - - - - -

I

-

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

- - -

)

- - - -

t· I I I I I I I

I I I I I I

~ I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample # 951006046 Sample IO HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Laboratory ~cport

Xauai Wacer Deparcment

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hina%Umi

Project pHASEV

96766

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r ____ _ Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-199S' Reported OB-nov-1995

Diqua t and Paraquat (ML/EPA 549.1 Quality Control

)

Control Parameter units Accual Found 'tRecv

.1.~lttL~.t.~JIY.~f~ jJt.~.llli~.Jla~~k'liIll LCS1 Paraquat ug/l 10.0 8.9 89

~~T.w~Wlttiii •• l~¥t.~MDrt~i=lt:Iit8~.~l".ElliE~.~isl_l1lift}. MBLlt Paraquat ug/l NO NO

•• f~_i!a~~~.ti •• MWifi1rtt.n1~fiiW~.$~1illWcllJa_t~~~i::~r$m MS Paraquat - ug/l 10.0 -I 8.9 89

mJIi$.~i"~_.[.@1!~1iW:Il!&I~~&_l[~f.ll~~jj~i1rtfl~~ltl.Wii\ifIii~i~~~~~ilfl~l®:

Report #. 23367

c - 28

()

-

<fD>'\ .'lTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 818 568 6400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample I 951006046 Sample ID HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037 proj ect ~PH""A""S!::;EV=--__

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oet-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995 Lihue • HI 96766

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS (ML/EPA 525.2 )

Parameter Units Result Cone. 'Rec Dilution Det.Limit Prepared By

:tiiiifi.i ~:iiilfii~

Report I: 23367

77

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

\

)

- - - -

-

o Co) o

=~.OM_aoIIInIES-555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 B1B 568 6400; FAX 81B 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

-Sample ID HANAPBPB VALLBY 404-037

- -. - -Project PIIASEV Sample • 951006046

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

525 Semi volatiles by GC/MS (ML/EPA 525.2 )

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

- - -96766

Parameter Units Result Conc. 'Rec Dilution Det.Limit prepared By Analyzed By

Heptachlor ug/l ND 0.04 12-oct-1995 rod IB-oct-1995 crw

Indenoll,2.3,c.dIPyrene ug/l ND 0.05 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw

II.ij~~§~I!itlil~la%!¥ti~~~Wii.l~%f.lR~lWIi~~.{'i~lm®.rK.U£f~MtilfiJt~Mf~~1!Wjllilitii.tt.iflialt{iilm\lBMii. Lindane ug/l ND 0.02 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw

Metribuzin ug/l ND 0.05 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-lt9S crw

Thiobencarb ug/l ND 0.2 12-oct-1995 rod IB-oct-1995 crw

.. : '"

Report .: 23367

78

-

.. ~ ...

Laboratory ~eport MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5227)

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box ~706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

Sample • 95~OO'04' Sample ID HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037 p:oject PHASEV

9676'

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r ____ _ Sampled 05-oct-~995 Received O'-oct-~99S' Reported 08-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS (ML/EPA 525.2 Surrogate Summary

)

Parameter Percent Recovery Acceptable Range

r~if! •• ~WlJWj_ll~ •• ~l~m8~~.'.lm~~~~~ftfi1~W1~jEf~1i~lmi1

Report .: 23367

c - 31

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I

I I I I I I

~ I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample IO HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

A'1"l'N: Wayne Hinazumi

Pfoject PHASEV

96766

Sample # 951006046

Sample Type Water sampled OS-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-199S

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

(ML/EPA 525.2 )

LCSl. Aldrin ug/l 2 1.S6 78

~_~~{~~@:~a¥i.lljj~f@'Ia~~'!Wll_{1f~7~.[ilimj~ LCSl. Atrazine ug/l 2 l.. 98 99

_~j:m~~~~~I.i~[~ •• @iff.~.~lP1ii~~w~i1)!7&!ili LCSl. Senzo (a) pyrene ug/l 2 l.. 79 90

~~"~rWjJ!fiDlli.Jr~milil~j.rli •• i¥lIfil.lk¥a\W~EII~iW:f#WlimWjllt~J~tfri LCS1 Benzo(g.h.i)Perylene ug/l 2 l..94 97

gj!~I~ ~i~1i!f~_rjlw.tIWiimtw¥ar~lil£I~~~~1I.1~_fjjJIt~~

LCS1 Ca~~eine ug/l 2 1.6J 82

}~ __ j __ ~&JP!.W •• j.lV~ltlmiftmi1~il~'jjf~l~~ljjll LCSl. Oibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/l 2 1.86 93

iiifjit._,.._~a.i.lilfitl~.¥J~_i~&$jD.I~DjliVJfI1~~i LCSl. Diethylphthalate ug/l 2 2.l.l. 106

~lIlI.w%~.ii_~ti.~_}.~.~IW@ilt~.:(f1i~~rmmJ.l_m~i LCSl Oi-n-Butylphthalate ug/l 2 2.28 114

.~:i.".~}: __ i.M.j~iI1.lf!~1Th.'~._itwfiit.Bm LCS1 Kexachlorobenzene ug/1 2 1.85 92

~*,.~i .. itj ~J!1~f~1{¥.ilIW$1l.~~llt~~W~J}11lmmill[l

LCS1 Methoxycl11or uS/l 2 2.l.4 107

Report #: 23367

c - 32

.----.. , '. :

.~

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, CalHomia 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 lABS (1 800 566 5227)

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Sample # 951006046

sample Type Water

Sample ID HANAPEPB VALLEY 404-037 Project PHASEV

Sampled OS-oct-1995 Received 0'-oct-199~ Reported 08-nov-199S

Control

525 Semi volatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

Parameter Unit.

(ML/EPA 525.2

Actual Found

)

tRecv

LCS1 Pyrene ug/l 2 2.08 104

~1fiff.I&1.ii{1fA_~~lmw~J}lDl.';!IB. •• i*!~1J.Wflt1t1.tl.jmm~igj~@lt1 LCSl Thiobencarb ' ug;l 2 .j 2.11' 10'

tlili-lt~~.WW.~~V~1f~~iMl_il.~.~~~~»I~@¥ii~lfImt1i1~lfi~~ij~f~ili

MllLIC Atrazine ug/l NO NO

r~~~1Iim_l;'}IM~ •• Wm.~4.l~r.U~~_iw~fjj.m~f~Jjl~l%r.~!gWmilii MllLIC Benzo (a) pyrene ug/l NO NO

~R~_1.~~I~*1~~t~~I~Jiliilif$1[~fWrlfg~~~~t1i1~[rmi.Wfi*~~ MllLIC Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ug/l NO NO

_Wl&.gl~._~li Ifg.lflm~~~~~f~~r_)lfJl!f%'0!liiiillr~~~

MBLIC Caffeine ug/l NO NIi

~1f8IltPI~~_jWt«i£if~¥%~;_~~~~ •• ~l~ilm~m~fIt~ilfif~jltygff®~~*lJllll

MBLIC Dimethoat. ug/l NO NO

is.7fo.l~W):mil)1.fil.lWt1&1f~~_!.'m~lt1{tlW_W~Wl.[ilm.flIg~~}i~i

Report II: 23367

c - 33

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

1·\ I 1 I I I I I ~. - ....

I) I I I I I I I .J I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 818568 640t FAX 818 568 6324:

Laboratory Keport

1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

&auai Wacer Peparcmenc

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

A'I"I'N: Wayne Hinazumi

Sample IP HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037 p~oject PHASEV

96766

Sample I 951006046

Sample Type Wacer Sampled OS-oct-199S Received 06-occ-1995 Reporced 08-nov-l'9S

Concrol

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

Paramecer Units

I

Report I. 23367

C - 34

(ML/EPA 525.2

Actual

}

tRecv

","'--' ..

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 818568 6400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample ID HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Laboratory ~eport

Xauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

A'l'"I'N: Wayne Hinazumi

Project PHASEV

96766

Sample # 951006046

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-199~ Reported 08-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

(ML/EPA 525.2 )

Control Parameter Unit. Actual Found tRecv

~1i.'lt~~~._lllll~.~j~lW~a~~f&&"7~W.iif~t. MS Benzo(g,b,i)Perylene ug/l 2 1.76 88

~'i~~@jB~'1aart_~w._~}~~~*.tMi[m1im"1l~~.!l~jJ&l@J ~ .... , ., Di 1:',:~thYlh:~:.) ~~~h~late ,. _ oW ug(.l . 'A •

2 .,... ,.w, .... },' :~ .. ,y .w.w , •• , •• ~~WN' '.

_iD111t~iJ:.ifJ.Wj(iif~lf __ ;~1*1~~~~ •• ~iJjfL~]liJ!ii.'f.$rt~~g~ MS Caffeine ug/l 2 -J 1 :4~. 73

@l~tiW&~~~i{~=J.~fil~1ii~.mll~%i5j~.~~· $~~~~~1$f.t~~ii~ii.~1~@iW~iit%Ifltf.ij[~lili MS Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/l 2 1.59 80

~iii$11~11ti.~i\.Jj~~1_.f$.~1B!f_jJlfM.~1~~f!11ltt.1i:litr •• !~iiWM~~~

MS Di-n-Butylphthalate ug/l 2 1.91 96

~filif[f~fflfl.1i.~~.k.~~mrtt~~_Th1f:.Ji.~$1ffifIll1"ilr_lt. MS Fluorene ug/l 2 1.72 86

~I.~1i.i.ill~l_$flOOwt1Sii1~~~.[i»~!im1f£lJJmWj=ltF$.M;t MS Hexachlorobenzene ug/l 2 1.71 86

iir._ll~\~~;~~_~It_~_.tlmw.lmi~~!1~i[5f!.tRilii'i~~li

HS Indeno(l,2,3.c,d) Pyrene ug/l 2 1.71 86

ill •• t~~\ __ 1&~ti~~.&~~jjlf~~l~~W~mJmil[~f@iliW!iiiflflm HS Methoxychlor ug/l 2 2.13 106

~.ii1i"_£l¥f~. ___ .t%t.§lJ.i.V •• 1it1!~.t MS trans-Nonachlor ug/l 2 1.91 96

!W]r*£~~~Iirtll;~I~~W.!g.ili~lWti~.wlil~l# __ ll.~i.E*1iii~~mifPdlii!t~iliil~~1 MS Phenanthrene ug/l 2 1.83 92

.*tl~~)~It1it¥.~il1~~li.d.~i.m.I~~~_1t~dJ&~lW«A~jil]RW.f.liilfm1~il1~~~i!fl1~iJ~~

Report #: 23367

c- 35

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

-

()

W 0>

-=,-~.~J-I 555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1800 566 5221)

- -Sample 10 HANAPEPE VALLBY 404-037

- _i_ ''------

Proj ect :;.P..,HA=s;.:E",V.,..-__ Sample • 951006046

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Herbicides by 515.1 (ML/EPA 515.1 )

-..a~to".ep-

J

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

96766

- - -

Parameter Units Result Conc. tRec Dilution Det.Limit Prepared By Analyzed By

2,4,5-TP (silvexl ug/l NO 0.2 12-oct-1995 mbr 0)-nov-1995 dst

2,4-DB 0)-nov-1995 dat

Bentazon ug/l NO 0.5 12-oct-1995 mbr 03-nov-1995 dat •• ~. w • ''':~ ~.c:"r~ ,........ ,. .. . ·N.·' .~<~*Y;;: '.>,:~.m.:\ •. ., •. '" ~i: :+: ~,. r,;~""'<>~"'A~~~ :« '" ~m_"· 'v._. ~._' .. ~ .. ~.. ~: ..... ,~. _'0$' .... : .... _;x ... . ', ... =~.'=.<w-?"_ ...... '. 'Iii •• · ·<''''·imEilmiilfiiflalt::''''-'''''''·"·",·,·,,,,:>.:,>.·< __ · ...• . . . . .......... ~ . ~~ ." ." :.. ~ *:," 0" _--.~~ ~... :. " .~.. • ~ " • ~~~~=l$: No ..

Report .: 23367

84

-

Laboratory Keport MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5227)

Sample # 951006046 Sample 1D HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Project ~P~HAS~EV~ ____ ___

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r ______ _ Sampled OS-oct-199S Received 06-oet-199S : Reported 08-nov-1995

Herbicides by 515.1 (ML/EPA 515.1 Surrogate Summary

Report #: 23367

C - 37

I I I I I

)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~ I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 818 S68 6400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Laboratory ~eport

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box l706

Lihue • HI A'I"l"N: wayne Hinazullli

96766

Sample # 9Sl006046

Sample Type Water

Sample ID HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037 Project PHASEV

Sampled OS-oct-199S Received 06-oct-199S' Reported 08-nov-199S

Herbicides by 515.1 (m/EPA 515.1 Quality Control

Control Actual Pound -Bentazon ug/l 1.00 ~ NA

)

tRecv

~."':""'<>·~"'~"."'mfli~1f._~_aEf?$Mtffrllf.'*MWl~_W$~~_ MBLX 2.4.S-TP (Silvex) ug/l NO NO

., ___ mtfll ~~~tNjlffil_:«K«\"~"'·~(.-:"'."':-:-·J;Jj.l*ti MBLK 2.4-DB ug/l NO NO

~~!¥J:.'m.~~~~~-~~~~~~mI.~~W?~t_~~l ~~:aJJ1~:::t:.~#Jij;;~~ ........ :.~~;:;~!?:@m"~~'o~~~~i:~··· '~=$-k~~~ MBLK S-Hydroxydicamba' NO NO

MBLIt DCPA ug/l NO NO ~;;.t ___ ~_::.~.<lh.: •• ~ __ t'W ~""M ._...,. ..... ,,~. '" : ••.••• :. .',;"" .~.~~~ ',,;,',W' ".... "'~;::»»""~'" »»».. "~:-,-m~~ MBLK Dino.eb NO NO

Report II 23367

C - 38

o

-

({I}j--.:.... . .JNTGOMERV LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample 10 HANAPBPB VALLBY 404-037 Project PHASBV Sample' 951006046

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

I - SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 ) I

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

967"

Parameter Units Result Conc. 'Rec Dilution Oet.Limit Prepared By Analyzed By

PCB 1221 Aroclor ug!l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

PCB 1242 Aroclor ug!l ND 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

PCB 1254 Aroclor ug!l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Alpha-BHC ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Aldrin ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr H-oct-1995 rok

Chlordane ug!l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Delta-BHC ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

p,p' DDB ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

iIiI_I.M$t\_i.$t~~Iit._l~~t.f.~ ••• ~f.qil%l'tllllf.*tlt}_i¥j~Iililmii!i.t.~.~l.lli~Y.ifi.iNtii.§fit.il Dieldrin ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Bndrin ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

~1I.f.~JiW1i.]lttiaWi~i""lltwr@! •• ii.fj~JM~lf£l~tt~1~~11~1.tW4f.Tht1iiti_li}jjlfl:iili~tt;~iiliif:~i:iiM~lnHj Bndosulfan II (beta) ug!l NO t'-- 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Heptachlor . ug!l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Lindane (gamma-BHC) ug!l NO . 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Toxaphene ug/l NO 0.5 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Report •• 23361

87

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I I I I I I I

I I I I I I

~ I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324:

Laboratory Report

1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

Sample # 951006046 Sample ID HANAPEPB VALLEY 404-037 P~oject PHASEV

96766

Sample Type Water Sampled OS-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-199i Reported 08-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 Surrogate Summary

)

mBJl,I,IIIII~ __

fN __ 1SW._1BBfr_MM: !w.!' ... ~~~:4"'::S'~.~.!~~Y<<,.,'w.':~'¥'""::<-i<~::>Z::'?ox:··.· m~~~~~~l';t(O~d~l_$::i~~w.:~l~~~"*-~?l ... O:-:O.::~.dM:~

Report #. 23367

c- 40

r--.

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5227)

Sample 10 HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Laboratory Report

XAuai Water Department

P.O. Box 1.706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

Project PRASEV

96766

Sample # 951006046

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-199S Received 06-oct-199; Reported 08-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 Quality Control

Control Parameter tlnit. Actual Found

)

lrRecv

LCSl p,p' DOT ug/l O.lOO 0.130 1.30

m;¥.11fl~.J1_\t$lWtti1Dti]rnrMil~f~l1]h1j.lia1t~Mli@jli_~~!tlf.ijllillbl~I'J1tItl1~m LCSl Endrin ug/l O.lOO 0.l03 1.03

_a~j§f;i1fi.~!f.lrg1aWAf:fjw.Ii.\_mm.if.Mim1[{(jIM1f~m1.lm~iji11~ LCSl Heptachlor ' ug/l 0.050.1 0.037 74

m~f.iiiiii&~i~ljJijf!¥.fi[tifJm!lml1i~~f •• tf"illlKi@iiiiJ~ff~ili~ftiit~l~l~~~{~ti~~~liiilW~ffii~f! LCS2 p,p' DOT ug/l 0.1.00 NA

MaLX PCB 1.221. Aroclor ug/l NO NO

rii.fWM'y:~mr~~fiffD~ ___ ~~~lIJi~it~lltlWf~J.~l~!%mlJ]im~rl

MaLX Aldrin ug/l NO NO

~"iWk_ •• ~.W •• *i~11ttf:*,IUi __ W~lll.WlfJl_£~~iW,tl.f_. MaLX Chlorthalonil (Orconil, Bravo) ug/l NO NO

~~1l'iilfl!'.}'1''1~!_1iilb.1ii~*mWif( __ ja.:f~f@.~ii~jf.11ltiBJ!1WmI~~IWllrJIiW@@i MaLX p,p' 000 . ug/l NO NO

Report #: 23367

C - 41

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample IO HANAPEPE VALLEY 404-037

Laboratory Report

Kauai Wa~er Oepar~men~

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Project ~PHAS~~EV~ ____ _ Sample # 951006046

sample Type Wa~er Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-199~ Reported OB-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 Quality Control

Report #. 23367

c- 42

)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~ATER. QUATtlITY ANAT'-YSES :&:a.n.a.pepe ~ell A

I . <m>

I

( ... .'"

MONTGOMERY L..ABORA'TCfUES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101

.8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 52Z7)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'. ... '-. ~:: ' .. ,' •• ' •• ~~:.:~} ';'. "'~': ._~ ~.~ .~' .~'. '0 ~'.:" •• ~.:. -, ,.. -.~ •• : • ',' •

• _ •• OM' •• _ ... _', ' ...... ~ ':'~~~'~'." " ' ..... :. :. •

HANAPEPE. WELL A

Laboratory Report

for

Kauai water Department P.O. Box ~706

Lihue, HI 96766

Attention: Wayne Hinazumi

.:' = ~:" .0:: ••.•••• :. •

..'

c - 1

r .....

~-

:':~ .. c: . ~~.

'"tJ

...

..

.'

....

." ' •• ,;t­

'. ," ~: .....

~ ~.' '.,::~: '~::;:. '. ..:~: . ,- .... :. -' ... :; ...... _. _...... .

. .•. :~'::'.- ~fiP~I:~0~~~tf· .-' "

Report#: 23367

MONTGOMERY L..ABOi:tATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 818 568 6400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5227)

Kauai water Department Wayne Hinazumi P.O. Box 1706 lihue. HI 96766

~'.-. J j '1 AICOt.: •· .. wJ ~v J~...J

laboratory Report #23367

Sample Received 06-oct-1995 15: 24: 26

Date Sampled 10/05/95

Sample' 9510060~5 location: HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

Parameter

Pesticides (Ml/EPA 508) Toxaphene ug/l PCB's ug/l

Result

NO NO

MOL

0.50 0.10

Prepared Analyzed

3 .... 10/10/95 10/24/95 \ 0-1.5~"'" 10/10/95 10/24/95

Herbicides/Chlorinated Acids in Water (Ml/EPA 515.1) 2.4.5-TP (Silvexl 2. 4-0 'alapon (Qual itat i vel

Jinoseb Pentachlorophenol Picloram

ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l

NO NO NO NO NO NO

0.20 0.10 1 0.20 0.040 0.10

50 70 200 7 1 500

Semivolatiles/Synthetic Organics in Water (Ml/EPA 525.2) Benzo (alpyrene ug/l Oi-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/l Oi (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/l

Endothall in Water (Ml/EPA 548.1) Endothall ug/l

DiQuat in Water (Ml/EPA 5~9.1) Oiquat ug/l

NO NO NO

NO

NO

Dioxin (2.3.7, 8-TCDo) in Water (Ml/EPA 1613) 2.3. 7.B - Dioxin Plcograms/L NO

Cyanide in Water (Ml/SM ~500 CN-F) Cyanide mg/l NO

C-2 9511011 1~-nov-1995 13: ~II:OI

0.020 0.60 0.60

5

0.40

1.6

0.025

0.2 400 6

100

20

30

0.2

10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95 10/12/95 11/03/95

10/12/95 10/18/95 10/12/95 10/18/95 10/12/95 10/18/95

10/11/95 10/13/95

10/11/95 10/16/95

10/13/95 10/17/95

10/17/95

Nontgo .. ~y wetson ~.Do~eto~l.S

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I

c.

Group Validation Comments

Ikesult for TCDD analysis submitted by Quanterra Environrnenta 1 Services .

• (508) Low recovery for chlorothalonil, high recoverie.s for IbDT and methoxychlor on continuing calibration standards;

chlrothalonil reported as NA. Reference QIR-GC-9S-189.

I I I I .j

-.;:. . ....,

I I I I I I I I I I I C-3

.'

." ... ~:. :\­

. '. ,. ... ~.

o

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 818 568 6400; FAX 818 S68 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-016 Project PHASBV Sample • 951006045

Sample Type water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-1995

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. DOl< 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Parameter Units Result Conc. tRec Dilution Oet.Limit prepared By Analyzed By

Bndothall (ML/BPA StB.1 ug/l NO 5 1l-oct-1995 rvd 1l-oct-1995 COl

- .. .. .. .. - .. - .. .. .. .. .. - .. .. -Report •• 23367

55 - ..

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; l' 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample # 951006045 Sample to HANAPBPB TOWN 404-036

Laboratory Aeport

!auai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Kinazumi

Project PHASEV

96766

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-1995

Control Para1lleter

Report .: 23367

Single Determination Analytes Quality Control

t1nits Actual

C-5

Found

-

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 818 568 6400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample 10 HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036 Project PHASEV Sample • 951006045

sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Diquat and Paraquat (ML/EPA 549.1 ) I

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Parameter Units Result Conc. tRec Dilution Det.Limit Prepared By Analyzed By

Paraquat ug/l NO 2 II-oct-1995 cfl 16-oct-1995 yka

Report ,. 23367

57

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MON'TGOMEKY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. Califomia 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 BLABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample It 951006045 Sample ID HANAPEPB TOWN 404-036

Laboratory ~eport

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

Prej:ect PHASEV

96766

Silmple Type .:;:W,:a.=t".e.=.r __ _ Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Diquat and Paraquat (ML/EPA 549.1 Quality Control

Control anita Found

)

tRecv

MS Paraquat ug/l 10.0 8.7 87

m1l:*~~1~"~_~~_~_~~&%l&\~~1lf.~mrj

Repert It: 23367

C-7

()

00

-

.tITGOMERV LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample • 951006045 Sample ID HANAPEPB TOWN 404-036 project PHASEV

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS (ML/EPA 525.2 )

Report .: 23367

59

- - - - - - - - - - -

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

- - - - - - -

-

()

<0

... IIIst.Stre'-Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

- -Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

- - - -Project ~ Sample » 951006045

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OB-nov-1995

525 Semi volatiles by GC/MS (ML/EPA 525.2 )

Parameter

- - ---Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

96766

- - -

Heptachlor ug/l NO 0.04 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw D~$?:\t .. ~;::~::_~::::::::~:::.-::~~~.:~·.:j: ··~~~$:tti>~Dl~~~1fi~<:m~:~~~~~~~f:i~ilt~~~:a'-i~~:Mi:s\'~t.%~f.~~.-=l~?~.:mr?~~.~i;~"i:»~~:~~"*:i<:.rJ.~~f:~~~>~.l=?::~f::::~::::~~;;::::;;w.$,~~§ tt::t~~!~t;"'''''~~'~M~m~1*x:.~l~~~:<:«o.""*t~::::*«.:;o..:~~i)ff,"~1S~-::':~»'~::::'' .. ~~tt:.zf~.::::. .. :::::~.:«:j:f&~ .. «m:.:::o:o=~m .. ~~;:::..'"?:!:&~Jl.:~~m:1:~ .. ~.~:l~::?:\%:.:::::~::: ... !'~~~~:t.;::..~_:::::*::::::::»:>:.:::t:I .... :IS~.»~ .... :~I:o:$~~;»::;'»::»:.~ Indeno(1.2.1.c.dIPyrene NO 0.05 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw

Lindane ug/l NO 0.02 12-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-199S crw

ii!Eiirii_~~,am~~j.1ElIfl __ ~~'i_~_' •• i_.I.l~fjli..~ Hetribuzin ug/l NO 0.05 ll-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw ~~i~<it.~~.lj~ll$lil~il"l":}1_&'.~)l~*:Mle:.m§L~~~_.@lm~~:'<t~f~~~;~~~f2.~%~~$;:::::::@OOj~i*;";"_~~ ~edIt~ ... ~ . ':.. .. '?MA~ .... : ,;:$~~;:I:.~:; ...... . ~ "'"!:::-5~'~f~~*:~~ . ·~~;s~~J.:t!D~;Jlt.tJ .~~ Hetolacblor ug/l NO O. OS crw

lii_i>····~.····:~

Pyrene ug/l NO . 0.05 12-oct-199S rod 18-oct-1995 crw ::;.<-: ••.•• :.;;; ••• ,';jy.~ ....... :::.":;;.'. ";;":w •• <~., :.,'.-,. ""m' : ....... >:<.'.':.' •. ':< .• : .... ' ... S§~_ ...... ' ..... ,. .. ........... : ..... w····:··· .. ··: .. ··i«-;· .. ~-i~~W~~~~-m(.t-""::;:;:;:.w.~~:~~*:~~~.

HiiiJ .~«.' . . 'y . '. ' . ::.... :~~~~~*'~i~~~~~_~~~"i«::*'iw.n_};i!t:~u~: . x'.

Thiobencarb ug/l NO O.l ll-oct-1995 rod 18-oct-1995 crw

Ii

Report I. 23367

60

-

MONTGOMERY LABORATORlES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5227)

Sample IO HANAPEPB TOWN 404-036

Labora tory .<.eport

Kauai Waeer Oeparement

P.o. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

Proj~ce PHASEV

96766

Sample # 951006045

Sample Type ",W",a ... t",e:.:r,-__ Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oce-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS (ML/EFA 525.2 Surrogate Summary

)

Parameter Percent Recovery Acceptable Range

fi;~l!iiiltt~ltl~liitti~r_iM~i.I~lmi~'l.~'i __ ~fJft&ti1jrlt\~I~~NMlat)1W~fjli~wt~~

Report #: 23367

c - 10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. CalHomia 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Labora tory .. "eport

Kauai'Wacer Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Sample # 951006045 Sample ID HANAPEPB TOWN 404-036 Project ~PHAS~~BV~ ____ _

Sample Type ",W".a",c",e""r __ _ Sampled OS-oct-199S Received 06-oct-1995 Reported OS-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

(ML/EPA 525.2 )

Concrol Paramecer CUits Actual Found tRecv

_lrf#mf:i~~l,tS:~~~.fAtl~1~"W._~tf~1f$§.llW.".#j;" : ................... :.'$.~;;;,~XX;;$;,.... -.~~ .... 'oYN ............ .v7i:.~~>:..~~: . . .•••• «"«:.r: . ''''.UN~w·Q·: "Q~'

LCS1 Acenaphthylene ug/l 2 1.73 86

t.i~mif~1_~£%rw.ftr.1_~ eWA~tlt.~.~~ils'f.i LCS1 Aldrin ug/l 2 1.56 78

.1~I}I¥I.i1ill~jl~~Thtl~k~~.~~~W_waYit._B!&'i1tlfEtlm LCS1 Atrazine ug/l 2 1.98 99

_i~i~jJ).~~(f. •• ~aa _al.if.m'j~.I~_ LCS1 Benzo (al pyrene ug/l 2 1.79 90 ~~Wr-.'];:::~W:t~~~f~@Wa~1)%lM®l~t§~_~m;fl%W~r.%~Wm~"%Witm~~~@f.~ ~~~;:f~~~::;:~:~~'»:'" ~NN ........ .M •••• ..:~I!i:~~~~~~$:::~~:::.~:::.~:~~.:P~~~~w..::~:~~~~::~t~:~-?:::::::::::.:f(~~~~~~ LCS1 Benzo(g,h,ilPerylene ug/l 2 1.94 97

.1~~1f.fi.{l~.~'mWiI~... w.~rtfili.N.ifil¥Jl.~

LeS1 Di-n-Bucylphthalace ug/l 2 2.28 114

"~il'1@i~~ •• i.i~~ _~lt\Wir_4lWi~Jf"llW:fi. LCS1 Fluorene ug/l 2 1.92 96 Wjijl{f:?:W.~:W2:~·~M.:~~:r~q;;I:!·:·:·::.~*~m.~!I!~iilill!MItltf%.W~.:::*~t~f.~~~%m.*?~~m~~w@ ~.!tf.::::;:tt:!:::@.":::-:!~::1~~~~~~ .. ~ ··::~~t~~~~·.( . ~ .-... =,:.--.c~~~~~ .......... _::.-- ... : ';::r.:::~:;:~~*~~$~~»'~**~~~~:::'::::'::':::::::

LCSl Hexachlorobenzene ug/l 2 1.85 92

f.111.~lfiii!_J.MI~~l_.~~ _fi~jfl~~M,m~U

Reporc #: 23367

c - 11

MONTGOMERY LASORATORJES

555 East Walnut Street Paadena. CalHomia 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5:227)

Sample # 951006045 Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

Laboratory Aeport

Xauai Waeer Deparement

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN, Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Sample Type ~W~a~e~e~r~ __ __ sampled 05-oce-1995 Received 06-oce-1995 Reporeed 08-nov-1995

525 Semivolatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

(ML/EPA 525.2 )

LCS1 Pyrene ug/l 2 2.08 104

LeS1 Thiobencarb ug/l 2 2.11 106

MBLK Acenaphthylene ug/l NO NO

MBLK Benzo (a) pyrene ug/l NO NO

MBLK Benzo(g.h.i) Perylene ug/l NO NO

"ifimmam::4fili •• lIi1f •• i.~ •• _Dt.$j:iilliW111~Y$rr$mml~1~fi&1~m~l MBLK Dibenz(a,h)Anehracene ug/l NO NO

_lftif#1IlttIiiitJi11Ilj~Jf~lm.¥~iK~$j1liJJfBWiE.1.iiiiifMWIDJllii!$~rni~~1~~l~ffgW~Ii~imlli1 . .-MBLK Dieehylphthalaee ug/l NO NO

MBLK Dieldrin ug/l NO NO

_11i%i~l@li_.i.tfiliI~¥iilf~~fl];ti,?a(@.i~f.jj]rJtl!iwrtf*!fl$Str.f~j&lIWJlJjj!ll.~i

Repore #: 23367

C - 12

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LASORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324:

Laboratory ~eport

1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-035

Kauai Wacer Deparcmenc

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI ATTN. Wayne Hinazumi

Proj~ct PHASEV

96766

Sample , 951006045

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1925 Reported 08~nov-1995

MaLIC

525 Semi volatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

Prometryn ug/l

{ML/EPA 525.2

NO NO

MaLIC Pyrene ug/l NO NO

)

:_~~~7,-:®;~d __ iIt]t~~m._':::'%. ~~:mfJt"~J.W$'W$.'fg@ri1 :.. .................. ~~~~ ..... ,.. . .... ::>.~~.,' ". ~!> ... ~~=::z::;::-.;;:.w.~~~:«**(?

MaLIC Thiobencarb ug/l NO NO

~&~~RT~ti~&~_& .. f@i_l€~~$W_~tiW@~ MS alpha-Chlordane ug/l 2 1.84 92 ~;::~~~",,~::>.::>,m:m:t~'!>~'!:':!*·~""~"''''''·''''''4!:m·~;f~~~~~<>:li/o."'.':M:;"~<"':i~:,;::.~~'_Jt.~-2·!w. 1!ia~Umit«~~'~~~;::~::i::o;~~:::~.:§~~~~~_~~-::-.:s;~i~::m~~~fj_~~~ x~~~ MS Alachlor 2 2 .05 102

m

Report " 23367

C - 13

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 lABS (1800 566 5227)

Laboratory Aeport

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Sample # 9S100604S Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036 Proj,ect PHASEV

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r~ __ __ Sampled OS-oct-199S Received 06-oct-199S Reported 08-nov-199S

Control

525 Semi volatiles by GC/MS Quality Control

Parameter t1nita

{l.IL/EPA 525.2

Actual Found

}

tRecv

MS Di (2-Sthylhexyl) phthalate ug/l 2 1.90 9S

¥.ilNiI@1~!lt'I{'~Ir.j~WillWiii~~i.~~.1!MtWI.t¥tlt;TiIfi1gf.Jl.~~tijf~i~]fj1ii

MS Fluorene ug/l 2 . 1.72 86

li]ji~wt'tt~im •• l[~~~~~f:li~t~Bli_~lrl.diiil'lii~lJ.Wt1il~~1hl!'!.~lJj~i~ MS Hexachl.orobenzene ug/l 2 1.71 86

._j~~r_~~ttt¥~ ~~~ __ lff;t1i¥~OOttW§Thifi&m~i

MS trana-Nonachlor ug/l 2 1.91 96

f.i!I~iJmftIIT~li_atj~f~~~$~w_.~~$ii!iT~~~~*I~J.~~~~j~1.t~~it~ITt1~jf~~iilIiflT~

Report #: 23367

c - 14

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

-

()

...... (II

~I:~un ,._

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

-Sample • 951006045 Sample 10 HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

- - - -Project PHASEV

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Herbicides by 515.1 (ML/EPA 515.1 )

Report I: 23367

66

- - -.I

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

- - - - -96766

MONTGOMERY LABORATOfUES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample ID HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

Laboratory ~eport

Kauai Wacar Deparcment

P.o. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

project PHASEV'

96766

Sample # 951006045

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

Herbicides by 515.1 (ML/EPA 515.1 Surrogate Summary

)

Paramecer PercenC Recovery Acceptable Range

g~i~ill.lili __ i:ll.;~t~tatft?J1L~liimf:[~~~%_~jf&tfiitItilr •• §i~~~mi~

Report #: 23367

c - 16

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATClUES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 818 56B 6400; FAX 818 568 6324: 1 800 566 LABS (1 SOD 566 5227)

Laboratory __ eport

Kauai Waeer oeparemene

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

A'l"l'N: Wayne Hina:umi

96766

Sample # 951006045

Sample Type Waeer

Sample IO lYWAPEPI! TOWN 404-036 p~dject PHASEV

Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oc;-1995 Reporeed 08-nov-1995

Herbicides by 515.1 (l~fL/EPA 515.1 Quality Control

)

LCS2 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) ug/l 0.500 ~ ..

f..~i~'1.w.JWn._t.~'~~D~~~.~~l1t.~~ LCS2 Beneazon ug/l 1.00 NA

¥imWiIi~¥_m_a.~"ml._l'tf: •• m~iWfF._.~ MBLX 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) ug/l NO NO

_1~~1'Jm~tlit~~1r.1mim.['~~l#Jaw.ft.t •• &mjlJlD1i¥i~jiJ~~£1_ MBLle 2.4-DB ug/l NO NO

f&lI1~I£ilr$;_.'W_~_.~~ __ ~i~.r$_Aw.tl.~mwl~ MBLIe 5-Hydroxydic:aml:la ug/l NO NO

.!llitf§~~~lS!.#.'~~lill1.Wk._k~18I~ MBLX Bentazon ug/l NO NO

~W~]f&_/'-t>,~~Wl.~i"~tlff;:~m;rdt~*~mm!g __ .WtW:!&1f'~$.m~~~.\lf."U@._Wi ·t.:r;::::.·.·.· ... • ... :.:««.W'.~~..-.·.w.~~~ • ....,~~~ ........... · ... w... ;.m«Y:-mo • ......,..,.. ~;!M~'O:;W..;.:.:.wNX·~::~.·:=:w;~;.'~ .. :::::-~~~-'"»:v: • i'NW'Xt'M'i.

MBLIe Dalapon (qualitative) ug/l NO NO

fa}~W:m"~~·~.2»~m-..~~~~~~~~~_ :.. ................. ~;~~ ... , .. ' _..;:e ........ VNoVN '$~~~~~_.}. "-iI'#,:::'''.: ," ~~:~)it=~J=$;.k· ..... ...

MBLIe OCPA ug/l NO NO

~~'1It?i~~W%W:~mr~~ __ WMr§i:!fk .. ~1.~i@W~1i?~.ii;UtW.~_t.l;1'?M~~m =1:~ ..... :e::::::::::;: ..... ::::::»»:~ ....................... v. ...... :~.»*«-:o;« •. *« ..... ~·· .. ~~ .. M.I.~~~~~:«-»m -, .~ ..... ~ .. ~Y6 .. rI;; •••• ~ ... ~y~

MBLX Oin08e.b ug/l NO NO

f~*w.:~_~~f%f~JWiflm~i'f.kgij'$~*~~¥"..,~*Wtwr,p~ ...................... :-".o:M.~~~ _.~~~~ ..... »-~~ ~ .:e::~. · ... ~ .. ~ ... ~4~~~ .... U\ ... __ N ....... ;y; ... ;.x.... .;ow;_~~;x

MBLX Pic:loram ug/l NO NO :""-';;;·;::·"';;:?:~*,,~~;~?:::::fi'~. .,. '~~:;:;:i:i:~m>:1i",,*i~':«''''~~:~::<>''~'~''';;:''~~ Y,:,~ >:. '.' ". :<. "liim-~ . ,.' .~'.' .. ",~. ,'. w. 'i:', ::::~~§.~«~t. '~;%if.« . .w,'w'-NY--w.B--""<"-<-"="-~_Wlii~~'-'ffi""">$'· ".> ~~~R~:~~~;["'q':!~%'''~;~~~~~~~'~~ :%:-t .. • • .-.:......,.~.~~: •• .::::~~.~ ~~. ·~~~~.:!v.v~4~~~*~t:~

MS 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) ug/l 0.500 0.46 92

~~Mi~.h_.Jh~&~£tl.tm.Jtmft®jflm~w;"n •• a~'lJ.j HS Beneazon ug/l 1.00 0.95 95

:W1W.~.?="*1.W~t"!~mt~A;"*,~"i~~~~~~_Ji!::~m.:m:N.~~~:Wl:'W"_~9:iw;4-=~ :~~*"m~'~::~i':;a:t~~;S=~~~~~~iW~~w~~::j:~~:~~~;~'~;$;:~~»:~'; .. N*·;r::::: HSD 2.4-0 ug/l 1.00 NA

~ !:!

Report #: 23367

c - 17

--" CO

-

JNniOMERV LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1800 566 LABS (1800 566 5221)

Sample 1D HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036 Project PRASEV Sample' 951006045

Sample Type Water Sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA SOB ) -- fF I

Laboratory Report

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue • HI

ATTN: Wayne Rinazumi

96766

Parameter Units Result Conc. tRec Dilution Det.Limit Prepared By Analyzed By

PCB 1221 Aroclor ug/l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mhr 24-oct-1995 rok

PCB 1242 Aroclor ug/l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mhr 24-oct-1995 rok

PCB 1254 Aroclor ug/l NO 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Alpha-BRC ug/1 NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mhr 24-oct-1995 rok

Aldrin ug/l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mhr 24-oct-1995 rok

Chlordane ug/l ND 0.1 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok ~~f~:t$~~~~~~Wr .. .z:.¥ii"#it"~t:'iWi:w.~~l'i~~$.~£:?~~~:*?t~~.,@.~lli1~M~~W.~~}~W.Wit~~~~~~h"t¥$:~i.Oi:::t~~:~:N~{=~:~~~~i:f@wm~~?!.&mj~i:'ta;~~M"iWW"W~;'~1f~"i.i;t¥~W~:}i:i~W=!t'$lM@~~::~*,},iW:¥::::::i.::::~-t~~1~tl;;'tl:;.'f::~*~~ ~~~~~~.~.l~:~?'::,~t::~~~~~::S:t"M!f:N:~~I:*:::t~Z .. ~~~:~$.~~~:.w..."mt::~*~~=t.§m~!!r*~~~~~~~~:*:~:Wb~=::s~~l~:::;%:::~:;:;*~f.:~*~~:~-:'~~M:~::!tt,~~:-':::x':'X:; .:. ·~~q!:;;t-:~~:~~~~a~r:**:~::::::::::~~:t~;s.Sl~~;~:~n:*::::::?=~:m~~~~ Delta-BRC ug/l NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

P.p· DDB ug/l NO 0.01 10-oct-1'95 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Dieldrin NO 0.01 lO-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-l'95 rok

Lindane (ga ... -BHCI ug/1 NO 0.01 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Toxaphene ug/l NO. 0.5 10-oct-1995 mbr 24-oct-1995 rok

Report ., 23367

69

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LASORAT'ORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. CalHamia 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324:

Laboratory Aeport

1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5221)

Sample 1 951006045 Sample XC HANAPEPE TOWN 404-036

Kauai Waeer Ceparemene

P.o. Box 1706

t.ihue ,HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

. Project PHASBV

96766

Sample Type =W~a~e~e~r~ ___ __ Sampled 05-oce-1995 Received 06-oce-1995 Reporeed OB-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 Surrogate Summary

Repore I: 23367

c - 19

)

MONTGOIIIIERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena, California 91101 818 568 6400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample • 951006045 Sample IO HANAPBPB TOWN 404-036

Laboratory ~eport

xauai Waeer Oeparemene

P.O. Box 1706

Lihue , HI

ATTN: Wayne Hinazumi

96766

Projece ~PHAS~~EV~ ____ _

Sample Type ~W~a~e~e~r ____ __ Sampled 05-oce-1995 Received 06-oce-1995 Reporeed 08-nov-199S

SDWA Pesticides (ML/EPA 508 Quality Control

Conerol Parameeer Onie. Aceual Found

)

tRecv

LCSl p,p' DOT ug/l 0.100 0.130 130

.ilflf~§lJ~f&1iti.lItWf~*~lfJf~11iW;1s1f •• _lil~.~~~~niji~Wl'.~~~Y~

LCS2 Hepeachlor ug/l 0.050 NA

_mY~T~l!i~atI~~~~~_m~~~~_A~fFA1'@lim1w..&i~ MELli: PCB 1221 Aroclor ug/l NO NO

t~et1~lllfj~i.li;iff.liiiW~~i •• 1I.jf.~~_jUl~~.W~lwrl@~lW~~~w]iifgifmJ.~ii~ MELli: PCB 1242 Aroclor ug/l NO NO

_Tf.1j~~.~.~ifl_~.lfi@~ wa.~£:>.lbm:>.l~~:>.l:::~"":f."".~-:t!:I:·:~:;~:WZ.4WF}}m.~i MELli: PCB 1254 Aroclor ug/l NO NO

_r~ •• [af«41_l.fttIfig;_m mr.~~j..ftrj~rl~itIimi~fi

MBLK Aldrin ug/l NO NO

fjJil~@I!1iI@ii .. q~jf.~i£~~~tWE*1tifJifi.Wl __ &Wi!1\JJltjg~IR~Y.~i{tlilfil@ijIliJi{~jjm MELK Chlorehalonil (Orconil, Bravo) ug/l NO NO

~_1~1Ii~li~~i\Y~-m~J~I~€lWtElff.t ••• _%1f:~fl •• TW.~~11*Mftlfi~~il~rfjili%~r~

MBLK Bndrin Aldehyde ug/l NO NO

lfj1£mlft~lfWl. __ .f..~~_Ii."~jj._m~fiWi~t~lti~

Repore .: 23367

c - 20

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES

555 East Walnut Street Pasadena. California 91101 8185686400; FAX 818 568 6324; 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)

Sample I 951006045 Sample 10 HANAPBPB TOWN 404-036

Labora tory _ .eport

Kauai Water Department

P.O. Box l706

Lihue • HI

A"I"I"N: Wayne HinazuDli

96766

project ~PHAS~~EV~ ____ _

Sample Type ~W~a~t~e~r ____ _ sampled 05-oct-1995 Received 06-oct-1995 Reported 08-nov-1995

SDWA Pesticides {ML/EPA 508 Quality Control

)

Control Parameter anita Actual Pound tRecv

~_ali!tk~4i~_imh"'~_lf~ __ W.I~lfl_.WtUmtUi MElLK Bndoaultan Il: (beta) ug/l NO NO

~fi!~l.f:t_~_iW.fAf.&" __ .l.ft1ft~~.lil.~IitW..~ilj~j

MS P.P' DD'I' ug/l O.lOO O.lJO 130

K~l~f~lji~Wl~WimWlt'lf~.I.~Jil~~ff~.mi'B~figt1~lllr~~~1:i..§wj.IiJl~W.

Report #: 23367

c -21

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

-'--~--'----'--'

APPENI>IX D:

"1lV'"ATER. QUAT.ITY ANAT4YSES :H:a.n..a.pepe "1lV'"ell N"o. 4

I I I I

For:

Food Quality Lab 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220

Honolulu, Hawaii 96817

Roscoe Moss Hawaii, Inc. 91-259 A Olai Kapolei, HI 96707 Attn: Glen Davis

TEL 808-841-4484 FAX 808-842-7883

Case No. Received: Analyzed: Completed:

"" II Lab Sample Total Coliform Fecal Coliform No. MPN/I00mL MPN/I00mL

II 1 Water Sample <2 <2 Well Head

II 01-11-00 10:35

II Project Name: Hanapepe W ~ll Dev. JobN: 19-KW-A

Sampled By: John Buist "'

II Temperature Control: 22°C

Methods: SMWW 20

II Total Coliform: 9221 B, M[ L= 2/100ml Fecal Coliform: 9221 E, M[ L= 2/100 ml

II Analyzed by: Shana Nagau ~

II I II o ~«:~D\YI~~ ,

II ~ MAR - 3 2000 -

I GOODFELLOW BROS .• INC

I I~proved by: "

1 ..... '0 \\.,l L.-I ,G{

\ -~ '-t- C:-v

I Food Quality Lab Portland, Oregon

1 01-11-00@ 15:30 01-11-00 @ 16:00 01-15-00 @ 16:00

I m,~ullrtyllfib- - ~ mr ~sI b17t r~L ~I~lftrr-1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817 Tel: (808) 841-44841Fax: (808) 842-7883

Report to: l:D:::"C01~ .. \ ." ,:"'-.~ \ \ I.'. '.; (. , ;. \ 1-..1(., •

Address: (~,\ - zS"-1 h OU~\

'£.k"\' I.. Lt: \ ~ \-\\ 1(,,-"Q(

Contact Penon: ~\",",\..I 'uk,VI ~~

Project Name: ~ '" M 1:." r<.l' 1". ':'·1- '/ . '/1 ; .... ;,.' ..

Phone#: Co B? - SSS ~

Job No.IP.O.#: \q~\(W'~

Fax#: Sampled By: :r04-11.1 "i,u I~

Pager#: /11B- 10<15

Temp. Control: ;;-ro~

I I I

Food Quality Lab 1505 Dillingham Blvd .. Suite 220

Honolulu. Hawaii 96B17 1·808·841-4484

FAX 1·808·842·7883

I CLIENT: Roscoe Moss Hawaii, Inc. 91-259 A Olai Kapolei, HI 96707

I ATTN: Glen Davis I PROJECT NAME: Hanapepe Well Dev. DATE:

Matrix: Date Sampled: I Date Received: 01/11/00 10:35 01/11100 15:30

I I I I I I I I I I I I

The following pages present the analytical data as received directly from E. L. Pacific.

Analysis performed by a certified sub-contracted laboratory.

Food Quality Lab Portland. Oregon

March 1, 2000

Water

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Environmental Laboratory of the Pa.cHic ,.,~ Qc-!'''J1rc "J1~tyr.k:~ t..al7orar.ory

930 Mapunapuna Str~~t. Suiu 100 Honolulu. Hawaii 96819 re/~phon~: (808)831-3090 Fax: (808)831-3098 E-mail: ELPacific@oc~anic-lab§.com

January 25, 2000

Lynnette Higa Food Quality Labs 1505 Dillingham Boulevard, Suite 220-Honolulu, HI 96817 TEL: (808) 841-4484 FAX (808) 842-7883

RE: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Dear Lynnette Higa,

Order No.: 0001081

Environmental Laboratory of the Pacific received 1 sample on 01112/2000 14:28 for the analyses presented in the following report.

-,

All data presented in the following report are relevant only to the samples as received and to the items tested by the laboratory. The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.

There were no problems with the analyses and all data for associated QC met laboratory specifications except where noted in the Case Narrative.

If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call.

Very truly yours, ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY OF THE PACIFIC

//cl{ Aidan Scott

Proj ect Manager

cc:

I'

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.Envir()nmental Laboratory of the Pacific Date: Jan 25,2000 ---- ..

Client: Food Quality Labs Project: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc. CASE NARRATIVE Lab Order: 0001081

Samples were analyzed using the methods outlined in the following references:

Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.

All method blanks, laboratory spikes, and/or matrix spikes met quality assurance objectives.

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

.Environmental Laboratory of the Pacific Date: Jan 25, 2000

------_ .... ========================~=== Client:

Project:

Work Order:

Date Received:

Lab Sample ID

0001081-01A

Food Quality Labs

Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

0001081

01112/2000

Client Sample ID

Well Head

_ ..... - ------

Work Order Sample Summary

Collection Date

0111 112000 10:35

Sample On Hold

2

I nvironmental Laboratory of the Pacific ..

~orkOrder:

• roject:

Lab ID:

Inalyses

NITRATE

~ RBIDITY urbidity

I I I I I I I I I I

Food Quality Labs

0001081

Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc .

0001081-01A

Reporting Result Limit Units

0.65

NO

7.9

E353.2 0.10 mg/L

0.10 mg/L

E150.1 0.Q1 0 pH units

E180.1 0.10 NTU

Date: Jan 25,2000

Client Sam pIe ID: WeIl Head

Tag Number:

Collection Date: 0111112000 10:35

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Dilution· Date Date Batch Fador Prepared Analyzed ID Analyst Qual Notcs

1/17/2000 1/17/2000 LAC1_000117A KVE 1/13/2000 111312000 LAC1_000115C

1/1212000 1/12/2000 ACC1_000112A KVE

1/12/2000 1/12/2000 TUR1_000112A MMM

.JI--al-ifi-.e-rs-: ---N--D---N-o-t -O-et-ec-te-d-a-t th-e-R-ep-o-rt-in-g-L-im-i-t -------s---S-p-ik-e-R-ec-O-ve-ry-ou-ts-id-e-a-cc-e-Pt-ed-rec~-ve-ry-li;;;-its----·-----

1 - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E - Value above quantitation range

.. - Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level I J ofl

I

I I Env~ronm_ental Laboratory of the Pacific

CLIENT: Food Quality Labs

I Work Order: 0001081 Project: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Sample 10 BLK011500 I Client 10:

Analyte

I Nitrogen, Nitrite

I I I I I I I I I I I

Batch 10: LAC1_000115C

Result

NO

Test Code

Run 10:

Spike POL Value

0.10 0

E353.2

LAC1_000115C

Spike Ref Val %REC

0 0%

Date: Jan 25, 2000

QC SUMMARY REPORT Method Blank

Units: mglL

SeqNo: 32635

Low High Limit

Prep Oate 01/13/2000

Analysis Oate 01/13/2000

RPO . RPO

Ref Val RPO imit Qual Note

o 0% 0

I Qualm~;;--·--ND • Not O·-e-te-c-ted-a-t th-e-R-e-p-ort-i-n-g -L-im-it--------s-.-S-pi-k-e -Re-c-Ov-e-ry-o-u-ts-id-e-a-cc-ep-t-ed-re-c-o-v-ery-li-m-its- - ----------

J • Analyte detected below quantitation limits R· RPO outside accepted recovery limits I

I B • Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

I

I I Env~ronm~~tal Laboratory of the Pacific

CLIENT: Food Quality Labs

I Work Order: 0001081 Project: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Sample 10 0001075·01AOUP Batch 10: ACC1_000112A Test Code

Run 10:

Spike

I Client 10:

Result PQl Value

8.2 0.010 0

Analyte

IPH

I I I I I I I I I I I IQualifiers: ND • Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

J • Analyte detected below quantitation limits

I B • Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

I

E150.1

ACC1_000112A

Spike Ref Val %REC

0 0%

Date: Jan 25, 2000

QC SUMMARY REPORT Sample Duplicate

Units: pH units

SeqNo: 32224

low High Limit

o o

Prep Oate 01/1212000

Analysis Date 01/1212000

RPD RPD Ref Val RPD imit Qual Note

8.2 0% 20

S • Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

R • RPD outside accepted recovery limits 2

I I Env~ronmentaI Laboratory of the Pacific

CLIENT: Food Quality Labs

0001081

I Work Order:

Project: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Batch 10: TUR1_000112A Test Code

Analyte

I Turbidity

I I I I I I I I I I I

Run 10:

Spike Result PQL Value

0.34 0.10 0

I QuaJifi-~;:;: -.- _. NO - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits

I B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

I

E180.1

TUR1_000112A

Spike Ref Val %REC

0 0%

Date: Jan 25, 2000

QC SUMMARY REPORT Sample Duplicate

Prep Date 01/1212000

RPD RPD Ref Val RPD imit Qual Note

o 0 0.32 6.06% 20

S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits 3

I IEnv~ronmental Laboratory of the Pacific

CLIENT: Food Quality Labs 0001081 .Work Order:

Froject: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Sample ID 0001081-01AMSD Batch ID: LAC1_000115C Test Code

lient ID: Well Head Run ID:

Spike nalyte Result PQl Value

itrogen, Nitrite 0.97 0.10 1.0

ample ID 0001081-01AMS Batch ID: LAC1_000115C Test Code

Well Head Run ID:

E353.2

LAC1_000115C

Spike Ref Val %REC

0 97.3%

E353.2

LAC1_000115C

Units:

SeqNo:

low

Date: Jan 25,2000

QC SUMMARY REPORT Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate

mg/L Prep Date 01/13/2000

32640 Analysis Date 01/13/2000

High RPD RPD Limit Ref Val RPD imit Qual Note

75 125 0.97 0% 20

Units: mg/L Prep Date 01/13/2000

SeqNo: 32639 Analysis Date 01/13/2000

Spike Spike low High RPD RPD Result PQl Value Ref Val %REC Limit Ref Val

INitrOgen. Nitrite 0.97 0.10 1.0 o 97.3% 75 125 0

I I I I I I I I

------------------------------------------------------------------ualifiers:

I I

ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits

RPD imit Qual Note

0% 0

4

I I Env!ronmental Laboratory of the Pacific

CLIENT: Food Quality Labs

0001081

I Work Order:

Project: Roscoe Moss, Hawaii, Inc.

Sample 10 LCS011500 Batch 10: LAC1_000115C Test Code

I Client 10: Run 10:

Spike

I Analyte

Nitrogen, Nitrite

Result PQl Value

0.99 0.10 1.0

I I I I I I I I I I I liualifiers-:--- -- NO· Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

J • Analyte detected below quantitation limits

I B • Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

I

E353.2

LAC1_000115C

Spike

Ref Val %REC

0 99.0%

Units:

SeqNo:

low

Date: Jan 25, 2000

QC SUMMARY REPORT Laboratory Control Spike - generic

mg/L Prep Date 01/13/2000

32636 Analysis Date 01/13/2000

High RPD - RPD

Limit Ref Val RPD imit Qual Note

80 120 0 0% 0

S • Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

R· RPD outside accepted recovery limits 5

... F •• d ttIIalMlJ I!IIb - - ClIAhQ' m ~sft)IW ~ftlfttOUmr 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 " HO(lolulu, HI 96817 Tei: (808) 841-44841Fax: (.,08) 842·7883 coot r;fb t

Report to: rgUD gUALll1 LAB Contact Penon: '-"~ l-hV)tu Project Name: ~~CIJr:: U b'.;,~ Ib;).i '"I /I-\L Addrell: 1505 Dillingham Dlvd:, Suite 220 Pbonell:

...., V

Ile"elbltf, Ilanail 98817 ral': mp8) 841-4484/Fax: (808) 842-7883

Job No.IP.O.': l-b~.l (J~(k W ~J} Oe V I Sampled By: "-SO h V\ • BlA.I&ot-

r Pager': Temp. Control: »-0(""

I

~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Sequoia Analytical

Date:

MEMORANDUM

May 11,2000 To: Ms. Lynnette Higa

From: Subject:

Dear Lynnette,

Food Quality Lab. 311 Pacific Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Ron Chew, Client Service Representative Re: Fax dated May 9, 2000 inquiries.

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 F}V«408)782~308

Per your fax inquiry dated May 9, 2000 (per copy attached), we have gone back to check the records. The following are our findings,

1) Mercury reported, as Method 7470A was a log-in error. It should be EPA 245.2. EPA 7470A and 245.2 are similar methods in terms of sample analysis and prep. The difference is in which method goes with which program. EPA 245.2 goes with' drinking water'.

2) EPA 504.1 vs. EPA 504, they are identical. System issues caused the missed '0.1'.

3) Dioxin. We subcontract Dioxin samples we receive to EHL (approved lab by State of Hawaii) and Triangle Labs in North Carolina. EHL does not analyze samples for Dioxin. They in turn re­subcontract to STL. We have no way of knowing which lab is approved for which analysis. We do our best to assist and meet the needs of our client. We have subcontract Dioxin samples from Food Quality Lab (FQL) to these two labs and we have yet to encounter an issue like this.

Please feel free to contact us if we can be of further assistance.

I -I I I I

CLIENT:

Food Quality Lab 1505 Dillingham 8Ivd., Suite 220

Honolulu. Hawaii 96817 1-808-841-4484

FAX 1-808-842-7883

Roscoe Moss Hawaii, Inc. 91-259 A Olai Kapolei, HI 96707

I ATTN: Glen Davis

_I

I

PROJECT NAME: Hanapepe Well Dev.

Date Sampled: Date Received:

01/11/00 @ 10:35 01/11/00 @ 15:30

DATE:

Matrix:

May 22, 2000

Water

I I I

The following pages present the IIREVISED" analytical data as received directly from Sequioa Analytical.

I I I I I Analysis performed by a sub-contracted laboratory.

I Total number of pages: 16

I I Food Quality Lab

Portland. Oregon

~I .

~ I I I I I

Sequoia Analytical

February 15, 2000

Lynnette Higa Food Quality Laboratory 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

RE: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc.lM001379

Dear Lynnette Higa I I

EnClosed are the results of analyses for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 13, 2000. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.

I . Sincerely,

r;;E I Ron Chew

Project Manager

I CA ELAP Certificate Number 1210

I I I I I I I ~!~

~

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA. 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

I . . ~

I

Sequoia Analytical

Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

I I I I I I I I I I I

Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -

Project Man!ll!:er: Lynnette Higa

ANALYTICAL REPORT .FOR SAMPLES:

Laboratory Sam Ie Number Sam Ie Matrix

MOO 1379-01 Water

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hili. CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 Reported: 2115/0017:33

1111/00

~--~~~~~--~~--~~--~~~----~--~--~--~~----~--~~~~~--~~--~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document.

I~ ThU ano/ytlcql rep," must be nprodu,ul in its .nlinty.

I Ron Cbew, Proj«tMon_ tll'~ Page 1 of15

:~ Sequoia Analytical

1 Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

1 I Analyte

Well Bead

I Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium

I Cadmium Calcium Chromium Copper

I Lead Nickel Selenium I Thallium

I I I· I I I I

Project: Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -Project Manajl;er: Lynnette Higa

Total Metals by EPA 200.8 ICPMS Sequoia Analytical - Morgan HiD

Batch Number

0010403 1117/00

"

" tI ".

"

Specific ed Method

MOO1379-01 1/19/00 EPA 200.8

" EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8

" EPA 200.8

" EPA 200.8 " EPA 200.8

EPA 200.8 .

" EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8

It EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8

Reporting Limit

1.00 3.00

0.500 0.500

·0.500 0.500

5.00 2.00

0.500 5.00 4,00

0.500

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1111100. Received: 1/13/00 Reported: 2/15/00 17:33

Result

ND ND

2.68 ND ND

7100 10.3

·2.84 1.27 ND ND ND

Units

:ID!!£!: ugll It

" .

" " "

Notes·

Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I I

Page 2 of IS

I . (J;) I ~

Sequoia Analytical

Food Quality Laboratory 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

Project: Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -

Project Manager:

I Total Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods

I Analyte

WellHead I Mercury

I I I I I I I I I

Batch Number

0010621

Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

Date Specific Reporting Method Limit

MOO1379-01 1120/00 1120/00 EPA 245.2 0.000200

885 Jarvis Drtve Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 176-9600 FAJ«408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 R orted: 2115/0017:33

Result Units Notes·

Water ND mgll

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill * Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I Page 3 of15

I

I

~ Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hili. CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

I I f,

0d Quality Laboratory 505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 onolulu, HI 96817

I

Well Head ~.br?mochloropropalle ~ne dibromide

'Su"ogate: 1.3-Dibromopropane

I I I I I I I I I I

Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

I I

Project: Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -

Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

EDB and nBCP by EPA Method 504.1 Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

Batch Number

0010382 1/14/00 .. " "

Specific Method

MOO1379-01 1117/00 EPA 504.1 .. EPA 504.1 " 50-150

Reporting Limit

0.0100 0.0200

Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 Reported: 2/15/0017:33

Result Units

Water ND ugll ND ..

Notes·

----------73.1 %

. * Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

RnlSED Page4of15

~

~ Sequoia Analytical

I Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

I

WellHead I Total Alkalinity

I I I I I I I I I

Project: Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -

Project Manfllter: Lynnette Hi.I~a

Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHAIEP A Methods Sequoia Analytical - Morgan HilI

Batch Number

Date Pr ared

0A26015 1124/00

Date Specific Analyzed Method

M001379-01 1124/00 SM 2320B

Reporting Limit

5.00

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1/13/00 Reoorted: 2115/00 17:33

Result Units Notes·

~ 94.9 mgfl

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill * Refer to end of report for tvct of notes and definitions.

I RAISED Page 5 of15

~ I

I.

~ Sequoia Analytical

I Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

I AnalYte

WellHead I Fluoride

I I I I I I I I I

Project: Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Project Number: -

Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

Anions by EPA Method 300.0 Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

Batch Date Date Specific Number Pr ared Analyzed Method

MOO1379-01 0010427 1/14/00 1114/00. EPA 300.0

Reporting Limit

0.100

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA 95037

(408) 176-9600 fAX (408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1/11/00 Received: lIl3/00 Reported: 2/15/00 17:33

Result

0.367

Units

~ mgll

Notes·

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical- Morgan Hill *Refer to end o/report/or text o/notes and definitions.

I I

I

~ Sequoia Analytical

I ood Quality Laboratory 505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 onolulu, HI 96817

Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc.

I Physical Parameters by APHAlASTMlEPA Methods

Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

Batch Date Date Specific Reporting alyte Number Pre ared Analyzed Method Limit

Well Head MOO1379-01

fPeC:ifiC: Conductivity @ 25 C 0010448 1113/00 1/13/00 EPA 120.1 1.00

I I I I I I I I I I

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1/13/00 Re orted: 2115/00 17:33

Result Units Notes·

~ H:Q! 465 umhos/cm

~~~~~~-----~~-----------------------------------------------------------------~~-----~~-----~-----~-----~~~-Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I

I· Page 7 oft 5

I ..

~ I

Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Food Quality Laboratory Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc .. Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 Reported: 2/15/0017:33 11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220

Honolulu, HI 96817

I Analyte

Batch: 0010403 Blank I Antimony Arsenic Barium I Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium I topper Lead Nickel I Selenium Thallium

~ I Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium I Cadmium Calcium Chromium I Copper Lead Nickel Selenium I Thallium

Matrix Spike I Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium I Cadmium Calcium Chromiiun

Lead I Copper

Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill

I I

Project Number: -Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

Date Spike Sample QC Anal zed Level Result Result

Date Prel!ared: 1117/00 0010403-BLKI 1117/00 ND .. ND " ND

ND " ND " ND

ND " ND

ND ND

" ND ND

0010403-B81 1117/00 100 103 " 100 102

100 97.5 100 119 100 105

2100 2100 .. 100 98.9 100 104 .. 100 100 100 102 .. 100 109

n 100 100

0010403-MSI MOO1378-02 1117/00 100 ND 108

100 1.06 104 100 8.05 106 100 ND 105 100 0.160 106

2100 43400 44500

" 100 4.38 92.6

" 100 20.1 108 100 0.61 I 102

R ~

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

Extraction Method: 200.8 ICPM8

ugll 1.00 3.00

0.500 0.500 0.500

50.0

" 5.00 2.00

0.500 " 5.00 .. 4.00

" 0.500

ugll 80-120 103 80-120 102 80-120 97.5 80-120 119 80-120 105 80-120 100 80-120 98.9 80-120 104 80-120 100 80-120 102 80-120 109 80-120 100

ug/l 80-120 i08 80-120 103 80-120 97.9 80-120 . 105 80-120 106 80-120 52.4 Q-02

80-120 88.2 80-120 87.9 .. 80-120 101

• Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

Page 8 of IS

I .

~ I

Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAJ«408) 782-6308

Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, ill 96817

Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1111/00 Received: 1113100 Reported: 211510017:33

I .IAnal e

Matrix Spike (continued) Nickel

I Selenium Thallium

I Matrix Spike Dup Antimony Arsenic Barium

I

Beryllium Cadmium Calcium

I

Chromium Copper Lead Nickel

I

Selenium Thallium

I I I I 1

Project Number: -Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

Date Analyzed

Spike Level

Sample Result

00 1 0403-MSI M001378-02 1117/00 100 13.5

100 2.01 100 NO

0010403-MSDl M001378-02 1117/00 100 NO " 100 1.06 " 100 8.05 " 100 ND

100 0.160 " 2100 43400

100 4.38 100 20.1 100 0.611 100 13.5 100 2.01 100. ND

QC Result

101 105 101

108 104 105 102 104

43200 91.3 107 101

99.8 105 100

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes*

ugll 80-120 87.5 80-120 103 80-120 101

ug/l 80-120 108 20 0 80-120 103 20 0 80-120 96.9 20 0.948 80-120 102 20 2.90

" 80-120 104 20 1.90 80-120 NR 20 2.96 )2,Q-03 80-120 86.9 20 1.41 80-120 86.9 20 0.930 80-120 100 20 0.985 80-120 86.3 20 1.20

" 80-120 103 20 0 80-120 100 20 0.995

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical- Morgan Hill *Refer to end o/report/or text o/notes and definitions.

I I

Page 9 of 15

~ I

Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hili, CA 95037

(408) 176-9&)0 FAX (408) 782-6308

Food Quality Laboratory

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 Reported: 2115/0017:33

Batch: 0010621 Blank

I~ry LCS

IMercury

Matrix Sgike Mercury

I Matrix Sgike Dug Mercury

I I I I I I I

Project Number: -Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

Date Spike Sample QC Analyzed Level Result Result

Date Pregared: 1120/00 001062l-BLKl 1120/00 ND

0010621-BSI 1120/00 0.00400 0.00403

0010621-MSl MOO1303-01 1120/00 0.00800 NO 0.00764

0010621-MSDl MOO1303-01 1120/00 0.00800 ND 0.00774

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

Extraction Method: EPA 245.2

mgll 0.000100

mgll 80-120 101

mgll 75-125 95.5

mgll 75-125 96.7 20 1.30.

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill ,. Refer to end of report for text of notes and ckfinitions.

I I

Page 10 ofl5

I

~ I

Sequoia Analytical.

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hili, CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Food Quality Laboratory Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1/11100 Received: 1/13/00 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220

Honolulu. III 96817

Date Spike

LynnetteHi

Sample Result I Analyte Anal ed Level

Batch: 0010382 Date Prepared: 1114/00 Blank 0010382-BLKI

I i)ib;"mochloropropane 1117/00 Ethylene dibromide " Surrogate: 1,3-DibrOl;i~propane----'-' -----2.sr----

I LCS 0010382-BSI Dibromochloropropane 1117/00 0.250 Ethylene dibromide 0.250 I Surrogate: 1,3-Dibromopropane" 2.86

Matrix Spike 0010382-MSI M001284-03

I Dibromochloropropane 1117/00 0.250 NO Ethylene dibromide 0.250 NO Surrogate: 1,3-Dib;omopropane 2.86

I Matrix Spike Dup Dibromochloropropane Ethylene dibromide .. I Surrogate: l,3-Dibromopropane

I I I I

0010382-MSDI MOO1284-03 1117/00 0.250 ND

0.250 NO " 2.86

QC Result

ND ND

2.83

0.294 0.286 2.96

0.282 0.271 2.97

0.287 0.281 2.96

It rted: 2115/0017:33

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

Extraction Method: General Prep

ugll 0.0100 0.0200 50-150 99.0

ugll 60-140 118 60-140 114 50-150 103

ugll 60-140 113 " 60-140 108 ._._------_. " 50-150 104

ugll 60-140 115 20 1.76

" 60-140 112 20 3.62 ---_._-----" 50-150 103

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I Page 11 of 15

I

~ I

Sequoia Analytical

885 JaNis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

(408) 776--9600 FAJ({408)782-6~08

Food Quality Laboratory Roscoc, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1/11/00 Received: 1/13/00 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220

Honolulu, lIT 96817

Batch: OA26015

I Blank Total Alkahmty

LeS I Total Alkalinity

Matrix Sgike Total Alkalinity

I Matrix Sgike Dug

I I I I I I I

Total Alkalinity

Date Spike Sample Analyzed Level Result

Date Pregared: 1124/00 0A26015-BLKI 1124/00

OA26015-BS1 1124/00 100

OA26015-MSl MOO1571-01 1124/00 100 22.2

0A26015-MSDl MOO1571-01 1124/00 100 22.2

Re orted: 2115/00 17:33

QC Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Result Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

. Extraction Method: General Pregaration

ND mgtl. 5.00

99.0 mg/l 80-120 99.0

117 mg/1 75-125 94.8

117 mg/l 75-125 94.8 20 0

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions. I .

I Page 12 ofl5

I

~ I

Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA 95037

(408) 776-9600 FAX (408) 782~

Food Quality Laboratory Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1111100 Received: 1113/00 Reported: 2115/0017:33 11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220

Honolulu, III 96817

Blank I Fluoride

LeS I Fluoride

Matrix Sl!ike Fluoride

I Matrix Spike DUI! Fluoride

I I I I I I I

Project Number: . -Project Manager: Lynnette Higa

Date Spike Sample QC Anal zed Level Result . Result

Date Prel!ared: 1/14/00 0010427-BLK1 1114/00 ND

001 0427-BS 1 1114/00 10.0 10.6

0010427-MSI MOO1402-03 1114/00 100 NO 103

00 1 0427-MSDl M001402-03 1114/00 100 NO 104

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

Extraction Method: General Prel!aration

mgll 0.100

mgll 90-110 106

mgll 75-125 103

mgll 75-125 104 20 0.966

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I Page 13 of 15

I

I .

~ I

Sequoia Analytical·

885 jarvis Drive Morgan Hili, CA 95037

(408) 716-9600 FAX (408) 782-6308

Food Quality Laboratory

I ~505 Dillingham Blvd., Su.ite 220 Honolulu, HI 96817

Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1111100 Received: . 1113/00 Reported: 211510017:33

Batch: 0010448

~ .Specific Conductivity @ 25 C

LCS IspeCifiC Conductivity @ 25 C

Matrix Spike Specific Conductivity @ 25 C

IMatrix Spike Dup

I I I I I I I

Specific Conductivity @ 25 C

Project Nwnber: -Project Manager:· Lynnette Higa

Date Spike Sample QC Analyzed Level Result Result

Date Prepared: 1/13/00 0010448-BLKI 1113/00 ND

00 l0448-BS 1 1113/00 1410 1510

OOlO448-MSI MOO1379-01 1/13/00 1410 465 1910

0010448-MSDl MOO1379...,1 1113/00 1410 465 1900

Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits % Limit % Notes·

Extraction Method: General Prellaration

wnhos/cm 1.00

umbos/cm 80-120 107

umbos/cm 75-125 102

umbos/cm 75-125 102 20 0.525

I~~~--------~~~~~ Sequoia Analytical - Morgan Hill • Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions.

I I

Page 14 of 15

1-~

Sequoia Analytical

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill. CA 95037

(408) 776-9f:IJO FAX (408) 782-6~

I.~~----~~~~--~~~ Food Quality Laboratory Project: Roscoe, Moss Hawaii Inc. Sampled: 1111100

11505 Dillingham Blvd., Suite 220 Project Number: - Received: 1113/00 Honolulu, HI 96817 Project Manager: Lynnette Higa Reported: 2115/00 17:33

Notes and Definitions

1\~# ______ ~N~m~e ______________________________________________________________________ ~ IH-Ol

Q-02

10.03

IDET ND

INR dry

I Recov.

IRPD

I 1 I I I

This sample was recieved outside ofEP A recommended hold time.

The spike recovery for this QC sample is outside of established control limits due to sample matrix interference.

The RPD andlor percent recovery for this QC spike sample cannot be accurately calculated due to the high concentration of analyte already present in the sample.

Analyte DETECTED

Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit

Not Reported

Sample results reported on a dry weight basis

Recovery

Relative Percent Difference

I Sequoia Ano1ytioal • _ Hill

I I l~I~~

Page 15 ofl5

@

"' .

.~ nolulu, HI 96817 I: (808) 841-44841Fax: (~08) 842-7883

Report to: FOQD ~UALlII LAB Contad Penon: ~~ '-h~A... ProJed Name: ~SCO", .• U 6~~ I~>i ,'1 /I-\C Address: 1505 Dillingham Blvd .• SUite 220 Phone II:

..., U Job No.IP.O.';: ~V\.)J?.t.JU W-l-H O~V 1 Ilelieltdtl. Ilemaii 96817

Full: Sampled By: 'JO hJ1 BlA.l~+ mOB) 841-4484IFax: (808) 842-7883 ,

Pager##: Temp. Control: ~O6

I • I Environmental H;;lth Laboratories

I The Nation's Drinking Water Laboratory

I Client: Sequoia Analytical

Attn: Ron Chew 885 Jarvis Drive

I Morgan Hill, CA 95037

I Sampling Point: M001379-01

LABORATORY REPORT

I Samples Submitted: Eight drinking water samples

Copies to: None

I Collected: 01/11/00 By: Client

I REPORT SUMMARY

110 S. Hill Street

South Bend, IN 46617

219.233.4777

800.332.4345

Fax: 219.233.8207

www.mastechnology.com

Report: 465878-87(78-80+82-86)

. Priority: Standard Written

Status: Final

Received: 01/15/00 ..

None of the analytes included in the detailed parameter list were detected in the sample submitted for analysis.

I Note: 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) analysis was performed by STL - Knoxville, of Knoxville, TN, CA certification # 2100.

I Note: Sample containers were provided by the client.

Detailed quantitative results are presented on the following page.

I We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this analysis. If you have any questions concerning this I report, please do not hesitate to call us at (219) 233-4777.

Note: This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Environmental Health I Laboratories (div. of MAS Technology CotpOration).

I

I Reviewed By:

I IFinalized By:

I

Date: )./11/ d()(JO ~~------~-----------

Date: '2-1 ( -Z-lCO --~~~~=------------

EHL i5 a division of MAS Technology Corpora.inn

Page 1 of 2

I Client: Sequoia Analytical

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

S r p' t M001379 01 amp Ing oln: -PARAMETER

Alachlor (lasso) Aldicarb Aldicarb Sulfone Aldicarb Sulfoxide Aldrin Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1260 Atrazine Benzo(a)pyrene Butachlor Carbaryl Carbofuran alpha-Chlordane

I gamma-Chlordane Chlordane 2,4-0 Dalapon 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Dicamba Dieldrin Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhe~phthalate Dinoseb Diquat Endothall Endrin Ethylene dibromide (EDB) Glyphosate (Round-up) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 3-Hydroxycarbofuran Lindane (gamma-SHe) Methoxychlor

..

Methomyl Metolachlor (Dual) Metribuzin (Sencor) Oxamyl .. (Vydate) Pentachlorophenol Picloram (Tordon) Propachlor 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Simazine 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) Toxaphene

SDWA Method 525.2 531.1 531.1 531.1 525.2 505 505 505 505 505 505 505

525.2 525.2 525.2 531.1 531.1 525.2 525.2 505

515.1 515.1

515.1 525.2 525.2 525.2 515.1 549.1 548.1 525.2

547 525.2 525.2 525.2 525.2 531.1 525.2 525.2 531.1' 525.2 525.2 531.1 515.1 515.1 525.2 515.1 525.2 1613S

505

MDl* Results (ug/l) (ug/l) 0.1 < 0.1 0.5 < 0.5 0.4 < 0.4 0.5 < 0.5 0.1 < 0.1

0.08 < 0.08 2.0 < 2.0

.. 0.5 < 0.5 0.3 < 0.3 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 0.2 < 0.2 0.1 < 0~1 0.02 < 0.02 0.1 < 0.1 1.0 < 1.0 0.9 < 0.9 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 0.2 < 0.2 0.1 < 0.1 1.0 < 1.0

0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 0.6 < 0.6 0.6 < 0.6 0.1 < 0.1 0.4 < 0.4 9.0 < 9.0 0.01 < 0.01

6.0 < 6.0 0.04 < 0.04 0.02 < 0.02 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 1.0 < 1.0

0.02 < 0.02 0.1 < 0.1 0.5 < 0.5 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 1.0 < 1.0

0.04 < 0.04 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.1

0.07 < 0.07 4.6e-06 < 4.6e-06

1.0 < 1.0

Report: 465878-87(78-80+82-86)

MCl Extraction Analysis lab (ug/l) Date Date Number

2 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 3 01/22100 01/24/00 465883 2 01/22100 01/24/00 465883 4 01/22100 01/24/00 465883

--- 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 £ 01/17/00 01118100 465879 £ 01/17/00 01118/00 465879 £ 01/17/00 01/18/00 465879 £ 01/17/00 01118100 465879 £ 01/17/00 01/18/00 465879 £ 01117/00 01118/00 465879 £ 01117/00 01118/00 465879 3 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882

0.2 01/20100 01129/00 465882 --- 01/20/00 01129100 465882 -- 01/22100 01/24/00 465883 40 01/22100 01/24/00 465883 --- 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 --- 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 2 01/17/00 01/18/00 465879 70 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880

200 01/19/00 01127100 465880 0.2 --- 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880 --- 01/20100 01/29/00 465882 400 01/20100 01/29/00 465882

6 01/20100 01/29/00 465882 7 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880

20 01/17/00 01118100 465886 100 01/18/00 01/19/00 465885

2 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 0.05 700 01/20100 01/21/00 465884 0.4 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 0.2 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 1 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882

50 01/20100 01/29/00 465882 -- 01/22100 01/24/00 465883 0.2 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 40 01/20/00. 01/29/00 465882 --- 01/22100 01/24/00 465883

--- 01/20100 01/29/00 465882

--- 01/20/00 01/29/00 465882 200 01/22100 01/24/00 465883

1 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880 500 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880

--- 01/20100 01/29/00 465882 50 01/19/00 01/27/00 465880 4 01/20100 01/29/00 465882

0.00003 01/19/00 01/28/00 465878 3 01/17/00 01/18/00 465879

I * EHL has demonstrated it can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but can not document them in all sample matrices. £ Any positive Aroclor result would require analysis for total PCB as decachlorobiphenyl by method SOBA (MCl = O.S ug/L).

I EHI. i~;a divi"iun {If ,\1:\' ledinnl,,!=-y t:1 1rpc1r;U)()11 Page 2 of 2

I W I En'vironmental H;1th Laboratories

The Nation's Drinking Water Laboratory

110 S. Hill Street

South Bend. IN 46617

219.233A777

800.332.4345

Fax: 219.233.8207

www.mastechnology.com

I LABORATORY REPORT

I I I

Client: Sequoia Analytical Attn: Ron Chew

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

Sampling Point: M001379-01

I Samples Submitted: One drinking water sample

I Copies to: None

Collected: 01/11/00

I REPORT SUMMARY

By: Client

,Report: 465878-87(81)

; Priority: Standard Written

Status: Final

Received: 01/15/00

I Chloroform was detected in the sample submitted for analysis at a concentration of 0.2 ug/l, which is less than the current MCl of 100 ug/l for total trihalomethanes. None of the other analytes included in the detailed I parameter list were detected in the sample submitted for analysis.

Note: Sample containers were provided by the client.

I Detailed quantitative results are presented on the following page.

I We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this analysis. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call us at (219) 233-4777.

I Note: This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Environmental Health Laboratories (div. of MAS Technology Corporation). .

I I I

Reviewed By:

I Finalized By:

I

,

Date: ------------------

Date: "Z-i /- 2.~ Q) --~~~~~----------

EHL is. division of MAS Page 1 of 2 r""hnolo!r (orp.ration

I I I

Client: Sequoia Analytical

-Sampling Point: M001379-01

PARAMETER Report Limit ....

Report: 465878-87(81)

Result Mel PARAMETER Report Limit ** Result

1~~~~IIr~n.t~~~~~-!~~1 I~~--~~~~~--~~~

1~~~~-jM4~~~~~~--~~~

1~~~~-jM4~~~~~~--In?t~

1~~~~IIr~n.t~~~~~-j~~1 I~~~--~~~~~~~~~--~~~ 1~~----Ih~~~~~~~~n1~~1

I~~~~~~~~~~~ I~~--~~~~~~~~~

I~----~~~~~~~~~

I~~~~~~~~~~~~

I Method: 524.2 Analysis Date: 01/23100

I I I I

* The MCl of 100 ug/L is for total trihalomethanes and compliance samples must be collected from the distribution system.

** EHL has demonstrated it can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but can not document them In all sample matrices.

t Compliance monitoring for these parameters must be done using EPA method 504.1

F.Hl. h 11 Jh'isilm III ~IAS Tc.'\:hnl)l,,!!~· (\)f'pur;linn

Page 2 of 2

I • I Environmental ~Ith Laboratories

I The Nation's Drinking Water Laboratory

I Client: Sequoia Analytical Attn: Ron Chew

I I

885 Jarvis Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

LABORATORY REPORT

I Sampling Point: M001379-01

Samples Submitted: One drinking water sample

I Copies to: None

I Collected: 01/11/00 By: Client

I REPORT SUMMARY

Cyanide was not detected in the sample submitted for analysis.

I Note: Sample container was provided by the client.

I Detailed quantitative results are presented on the following page.

110 S. Hill Street

South Bend. IN 46617

219.233.4777

800.332.4345

Fax: 219.233.8207

www.mastechnology.com

~eport: 465878-87(87)

Priority: Standard Written

Status: Final

Received: 01/15/00

I We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this analysis. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call us at (219) 233-4777.

I Note: This report m..ay not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Environmental Health Laboratories (div. of MAS Technology Corporation). .

I I IReviewed By: Date: J./// /:)()O()

IFinalized By: Date: 'Z -/1- ZtJ DU

I EHL is • division or MAS T<,'hnolosy Corpo"lion Page 1 of 2

Report: 465878-87(87) 1 Client: Sequoia Analytical

1 Sampling Point: M001379-01

::;:u~~~~:~~:,{ ~ i~: ~~~"~~~:g, ~~:~,~~,~:~{i: V~~;Nv~: ' > '''0 / ,- ""-13 "ft· 'J'~' ''''"''Vt2~~v'' 3., ' "''"0'" 'i''''"'' ~'.@~.~''''', ""'~W:4%~'''''''''.W'i''1'Cj1 / ~ v\ ~~1::: ~ : ;;." t1~~'~ 'II :1 ~ ,> !x~N <>~{\~ ;',/~ ~,~'0 ...';~<:y v ~ ,,>£~rJ.\:::~i.4·~';; '/1: ~";i< , _'" "' ",,_1, "',v"1_"""",,,.,1,,~} ,,',", ,,,.,,,,,-,*,,,jJii ;;\§ &;_,="Q:ll&t" ~', ~~=w,jIL,,,,,,i£©ij

1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1

PARAMETER

Cyanide

1 Comments:

SDWA MOL * Method 335.4 0.02

Results MCl Units Analysis Lab Date Number

<0.02 0.2 mg/L 01/19/00 465887

1-----------------------1------------------------1-----------------------I * EHL has demonstrated It can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but can not document them in aU sample matrices.

I I EHI. i, J dil'i';(In 01 MAS Page 2 of 2

Tc.'(hnnk~~· t:urpnration

I quoia Analytical - Morgan Hill 5 Jarvis Drive

lorgan Hill. CA 95037

one: 408-776-9600 Fax: 408-782-6308

oject Manager: Ron Chew

113/00 10:30

f"·N_-tOOl"'" , I

I I I I I I

Matrix

Water

Sampled! Expires

1/11/00

1118/00

1/18/00

1125/00

1125100

1125100

218/00

1118/00

1118100

1118/00

1/25/00

~equOia l\.nalytICal - Morgan Hill Subcontract Order M001379

Receivin

Environmental Health Labs 110 S. Hill Street South Bend, IN 46617

Phone: 219-233-4777 Fax: 219-233-8207

Subcontract Order Commepts

Sample/Analysis Information

Analysis Requested Due Lab Nwnber Container

B.C,D,E. F,G,J,K

1613 Dioxin WD 112"00 ItiJ,!1 S"l8 IJ9S PestlPCB D SO~h 1125100 4V587Ci "' 515.1 Herbicides D 112S100 4fJ;Sg'gO 524.2 Volatiles D 1125/00 4-~'SF81 525.2 SemivolatilesD 1125100 1./-/,75 gg2-531.1 Carbamates D 1125/00 4-IP !; <tS-3 547 Glyphosate D 1/25100 4-r~8~Lf 548.1 Endothall D 112S/00 Ltll ~ &,g 5 549.1 Diquat D 1125/00 U1;5 8'6 tt, Cyanide. Total-335.2 1125/00 If-vG~81

Sub to EHL

EHL.

EHL

SubtoEHL

Sub to EHL

SubtoEHL "

SubtoEHL

Sub.toEHL

SubtoEHL

SubtoEHL

Date I-Is--oo I I Released By _______ ---.:Date ____ Received By ________ Date ___ _

Comments I I

Page 1 of 1