CT scan-generated frontal sinus templates in osteoplastic ...
-
Upload
maxisurgeon -
Category
Documents
-
view
660 -
download
6
Transcript of CT scan-generated frontal sinus templates in osteoplastic ...
CT scan-generated frontal sinus templates in osteoplastic
flap surgery
Mat Daniel, Jason Watson *, Anshul Sama
Otorhinolaryngology and *Maxillofacial Surgery
Nottingham University Hospital
British Rhinological Society
May 2008
Frontal sinus mapping inosteoplastic flap surgery
Crucially important in FS osteoplastic flap surgery
• Caldwell radiograph from 6ft, positioned over FS• Composite CT image of frontal sinus (Fewins
04)• Controlled burr holes along proposed osteotomy
line (or within FS area), connected with oscillating drill (Maniglia 91)
• Sinus probing• Transillumination• Image Guidance Systems (IGS)
Frontal sinus mapping
• IGS more accurate than Caldwell, sinus probing, or transillumination (Ansari 03, Melroy 06)
• IGS reduces complications (Sindwani 04)
• IGS may not be available, and does not give actual 3D representation
• In contrast, most ENT units will have links with a maxillofacial laboratory
Aim
Develop a 3D template of the frontal sinus
that can be used intra-operatively as an
onlay guide to FS mapping
Model & Template productionImport CT images,
identify required region
Drill FS on light-cure sheetto form custom template
“Print” 3D sinus modellayer by layer
Onlay malleable light-cureresin sheet and process
Sterilise for directuse in theatre
Clinical use
Close collaboration with prosthetics / maxillofacial laboratory
Original model available in theatre
Onlay template sterilised
Template placed onto FS after skin flap
Glabella/ nasion/ supraorbital ridge configuration used to anchor template for correct placement
Outline of FS marked with a drill
Computerised 3D reconstruction
Model
Model + template
Template in theatre
FS outlined
FS opened
Our experience
8 patients to date
Consistently accurate to within <1mm of actual frontal sinus size
Problem: in chronic infection and with multiple previous procedures, bone may be difficult to differentiate from FS contents on CT, impacting on quality of model and thus template
Advantages
Cost<IGS: model £100/£20, template £25Maxfac lab at most regional hospitals
Better anchoring than X ray
3D onlay template3D model
Disadvantages
Pre op planningNeed specialist facility
Construction time (1 week)
More expensive than Caldwell X ray
?Accuracy comparison with IGS: further research
Conclusion
3D models of frontal area generated from CT scans can be utilised to create 3D templates of the frontal sinus, which are then used intra-op as an onlay guide to frontal sinus mapping.
Early experience shows them to be consistently accurate to within 1mm, suggesting they would be a useful adjunct to current techniques, esp if IGS not available.
Comparison with existing techniques is needed.
Thank you