CT Fishing and Jetting Operations – Coiled Tubing
-
Upload
kevin-steinbach -
Category
Documents
-
view
54 -
download
23
description
Transcript of CT Fishing and Jetting Operations – Coiled Tubing
CT Fishing and Jetting Operations –
Coiled Tubing
• Free Point
• Fishing with and for coiled tubing
• Jars
• Impact tools• Impact tools
• Jetting basics
8/25/2015 1George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tools
• About 70% of CT operations include cleanout
• (including application on H2S, high temps,
hostile fluids and press)
• Impact drills offer alternatives to motors in • Impact drills offer alternatives to motors in
these environments
8/25/2015 2George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tools
• Impact tools offer rotation. Tools designed to
give a twisting, downwards blow somewhat
like a jar. A fluid pulse from the operation of
the tool washes away the cuttings. Impact the tool washes away the cuttings. Impact
tools operate with as little as 500 psi - 1/4”, at
higher pressures, the tool lifts further and
delivers a harder jolt.
8/25/2015 3George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tool Operation
• On bottom, bring up press at tool (from 400 to
500 psi), add weight (to about 800 lbs.
• Let conditions of deposit or formation decide
ultimate loading and pressure. ultimate loading and pressure.
• Curves of performance are available.
• Increase rate at the tool to change the impact
rate.
8/25/2015 4George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tool Operation
• The single direction tool only operates when it sits down and bottoms out on something solid. Normally, it is at full extension.
• The bi-directional tool will run if circulation is sufficient. Can wear out as you run into the well if sufficient. Can wear out as you run into the well if circulation is maintained.
• Tools do not store reverse torque (no tendency to unscrew).
• Reports of operating to 600F.
8/25/2015 5George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tool Specifics
• Tool string is short.
• Can be equipped for use in H2S or HCl.
• Can operate in parallel with motors.
• Can run on any fluid, gas or water. • Can run on any fluid, gas or water.
8/25/2015 6George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tool Specifics
• For impact tools, produce cracks, then wash
off debris.
• Penetration rates through barium sulfate
reported to 150 ft/hr. reported to 150 ft/hr.
• Pilot hole followed by cleanup run is best.
• Leave at least 1/8” scale sheath thickness on
pilot?
8/25/2015 7George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Impact Tool Special Points
• May need an accelerator in conjunction with
an impact tool, but only in the upper part of
the hole (to a depth of 200 ft). Weight
influences operationinfluences operation
• Can tell a tool stall by lack of pressure
fluctuation.
8/25/2015 8George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Specifics for Impact Tools
• For barium sulfate cleanouts, use water,
solvents or acids.
• Run life? 80 hrs?
– fatigue loading of CT? (None reported) – fatigue loading of CT? (None reported)
– Some seam splitting on worn strings.
8/25/2015 9George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Deposit Removal
• Jetting
– Water jet
– Abrasive jet - cutting
– Abrasive jet - deposit removal– Abrasive jet - deposit removal
– Fluid/Pressure pulse
• Mechanical (milling and chipping)
– mill and motor
– impact tool
8/25/2015 10George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
8/25/2015 11George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Side Jetting Nozzle
Backpressure from the annular
fluid column in a well decreases
the effectiveness of the jet since
it holds a back pressure on the
flow.
8/25/2015 12George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
8/25/2015 13George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Nozzle Energy
• Nozzle energy is dependent on the standoff
distance between the nozzle outlet and the
target face. Nozzle diameter (d) is critical to
impact power, standoff sharply drops impact impact power, standoff sharply drops impact
power.
No loss
for 6 d
80% loss from
7d to 24d
8/25/2015 14George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Solids Transport in Annuli
(Conventional Jetting)• Difficult to unload sand from 7” casing even with 1-
3/4” CT
• Very difficult over 20o deviation and Boycott setting range of 30 to 60o is most difficult.
• Low reservoir pressure and dense particles (bauxite • Low reservoir pressure and dense particles (bauxite and BaSO4) are an added problem.
• Example Well – North Sea – 60o deviation, 9-5/8” casing and 3-1/2” tailpipe, very low pressure well –how to unload several meters of fill????
8/25/2015 15George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Typical fluid density increase with sand at 1
lb/gal is about 9%. Sand is 6% of coil volume
at 1 lb/gal.
At 10,000 ft, weight difference between 0.43
and 0.47 psi/ft (1 lb sand) is 0.77 lb/gal or
extra 500 lb
8/25/2015 16George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
8/25/2015 17George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Jetting Fluids
Filtered Fluid Type Remeadation
brines salt, silt fill
foams heavier fill/large annulus
xylene, toluenexylene, toluene OBM, asphaltene, wax
kerosene, #1 diesel some waxes
acids carb. scales, rust
8/25/2015 18George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Water Blast and Abrasive Targets
• mud debris
• pipe dope
• scale (softer scales for water blast)
• cement residue• cement residue
• mill scale (81 lb/1000 ft?)
• corrosion by-products
• bacteria colonies
8/25/2015 19George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
8/25/2015 20George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Layers of calcium carbonate scale from surface pipe prior to first stage Layers of calcium carbonate scale from surface pipe prior to first stage
separator. North Sea Field. Subsequent inhibitor treating has
significantly reduced the scale deposition.
8/25/2015 21George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
8/25/2015 22George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Slot 8, A19 Cumulative Milled Scale
60
80
100
Kil
og
ram
mes p
er
join
t
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200C
um
ula
tive K
ilo
gra
mm
es Kg's per Joint Cumulative Kg's
0
20
40
0 807 1585 2359 3137 3909 4729 5476 6281 7049 7821 8597 9367 10137 10907 11678 12444 13211 13984
Measured Depth ft
Kil
og
ram
mes p
er
join
t
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Cu
mu
lati
ve K
ilo
gra
mm
es
8/25/2015 23George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
S19/A14 Cumulative Milled Scale
400
500
600
700
800
Scale
per
jt
8000
10000
12000
14000
Scale Kg's /jt Accumul Milled Scale
Miller scale milling – 12,047 ft to
14,483 ft
0
100
200
300
12047 12140 12233 12328 12419 12512 12606 12699 12792 12886 12979 13073 13166 13260 13354 13448 13542 13636 13730 13824 13919 14012 14106 14201 14295 14388 14483
Measured Depth ft
Scale
per
jt
0
2000
4000
6000
8/25/2015 24George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
A12 Cumulative Milled Scale
10000
12000
14000
Scale recovered at the surface – the quantity of scale that arrives in slugs indicates either non
standard hole cleaning rate or material unloading problems.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Measured Depth ft
Kg
's S
ca
le
8/25/2015 25George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Cyclone separation of returned BaSO4
scale from a milling operation in Miller
Field.
8/25/2015 26George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Bauxite Cleanouts
• Caution against flowing Bauxite through permanent facilities. Surface pipe, valves and chokes have the most danger of erosion.
• Equipment? - redundant chokes, (over designed manifold), long radius ells, SSSV, and continuous monitoring of all elbows (measured some wall loss monitoring of all elbows (measured some wall loss during the job) - flowed it directly to a flare pit.
• Done safely, but was all special equipment designed for flowback, not permanent facilities.
• High rate gas wells and bauxite always deserve extra caution and conservatism.
Donn Schmohr – 10/20028/25/2015 27George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Entering a Well With CT While
Flowing• Scale milling with 1-3/4” CT (tapered
string) on Bruce in the North Sea
• Had to flow a gas well hard, at 60 MMSCFD/1000 BOPD, to get the WHP MMSCFD/1000 BOPD, to get the WHP from a shut-in value of 4000 psi down to 2000 psi, to be able to RIH.
• Could not bullhead water – well is a severe hydrate producer.
8/25/2015 28George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Entering a Well With CT While
Flowing• Concerned about the prospect of running
through the tree (5-1/8" bore), the tubing (4.687"), and the safety valve (4.562"), and QN nipple (4.475") with a 4.4" Turbomill bit. Calculated and confirmed little pressure drop Calculated and confirmed little pressure drop across the bit from the flow rate
• It all worked just fine. And to think we normally pinch wells back/shut them in to RIH, worried about the flow. Never saw any weight loss when we left the riser.
• Source – Charlie Michel, BP, Aberdeen Office, March 2001
8/25/2015 29George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Depth Control With CT
• Problems
– Depth Measurement
• stretch
• temperature
• drag• drag
– Depth Correlation
• CCL, GR not available unless CT is wired
– Alternatives
• tag a known depth
• memory CCL & GR - after the fact check?
8/25/2015 30George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
What’s Different in Acidizing with
Coiled Tubing?
• Volume differences between CT and regular
tubing.
• Ability to easily move tubing while injecting
acidsacids
• Easily moveable inflatables for isolation
8/25/2015 31George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Completion Fluid - Checklist
• Is the formation liquid sensitive to liquid relative permeability effects?
• Compatability with formation? (clay and minerals)
• Compatability with formation fluid? (emulsion, sludge, foam, froth)
• Tanks and surface equipment clean?(pumps, lines, hoses, blenders)
• Are polymers breakable? How is breaker added?
• Polymers, hydrated, sheared and filtered? Filter level? Beta rating?
• Minimize the pipe dope?
• Corrosion reactions understood?
• Erosion potential understood?
8/25/2015 32George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Wellbore cleanout
• Common problems (BUT, look at “why” first)
– mud/cement/perf/complet. fluid particles
– scale (acid sometimes)
– paraffin (forget the acid)– paraffin (forget the acid)
– emulsions (acid???)
– sludges (a real thick emulsion, acids worsen)
– tars (no acid here either)
8/25/2015 33George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Internal Capacities of CT
• 1.25 x 0.095” 1.09 bbl/1000 ft
• 1.50 x 0.109” 1.6 bbl/1000 ft
• 1.75 x 0.125” 2.2 bbl/1000 ft
• 2 x 0.134” 2.9 bbl/1000 ft• 2 x 0.134” 2.9 bbl/1000 ft
• 2.375 x 0.134”4.3 bbl/1000 ft
• 2.875 x 0.134”6.6 bbl/1000 ft
Remember that the entire string of CT is “active” in the acid job - not just the depth of the well.
8/25/2015 34George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Problems with Solvents
• rubber/elastomer seal deterioration
• density problems (hard to get to and hold on
bottom)
• getting reasonably pure solvents• getting reasonably pure solvents
– ie., xylene b.p. is 138-144 C
– naphta not nearly as good
– just what is a xylene bottom? - don’t use it.
8/25/2015 35George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Solvent Volumes
• paraffin removal
– 10 to 15 gal/ft of affected zone.
• asphaltene removal
– 10 to 25 gal/ft - and this won’t dissolve much!– 10 to 25 gal/ft - and this won’t dissolve much!
– 100 grams of xylene dissolves 9 grams of
asphaltenes
• tar removal - ? Get a sample.
8/25/2015 36George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Energy in Jetting
• Impact force from pressure drop
• Impact force improved by shaped nozzle
• Cavitation is most helpful, but disappears with
increasing back pressure.increasing back pressure.
8/25/2015 37George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Nozzle Energy
• Nozzle energy is dependent upon the standoff
distance between the nozzle outlet and the
face of the target.
Energy
8/25/2015 38George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Nozzle Power Drop Off
• For the first six to seven nozzle diameters, there is essentially no loss of velocity in the center line of the fluid stream. From seven to 24 nozzle diameters, an exponential loss of up to 80% of the initial velocity, and at clearances to 80% of the initial velocity, and at clearances over 24 nozzle diameters, a more gradual decrease of the remaining energy is seen.
• Typical nozzle is 1/32” (0.8 mm) to 1/8” 3 mm
8/25/2015 39George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Nozzle Efficiency
• The transfer of momentum between a fluid
and a rock surface is relatively inefficient.
Cutting generally only occurs when the force
from the fluid impingement momentum is at from the fluid impingement momentum is at
least 1.5 times the compressive strength of
the rock.
• Typical compressive strengths = 5,000 psi to
12,000 psi.
8/25/2015 40George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Solids
• An improvement over the cavitating nozzle
may be the addition of small solid particles to
form a particle jet.
• The cutting ability of particle jets do not fall • The cutting ability of particle jets do not fall
off as rapidly as cavitating nozzles. They are
still affected by ambient pressure, but not to
the extent of a cavitating nozzle.
8/25/2015 41George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Particle Nozzles
• Particle jet nozzles are typically on the order
of 1/16 to 1/8 in. Erosion of the nozzle is
common and erosion increases with hardness
and concentration of the solids in the stream and concentration of the solids in the stream
at any set of operating conditions.
8/25/2015 42George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Abrasives in Jetting
• Can remove any deposit, including steel.
• Need an abrasive that is just harder than
deposit but softer than steel.
• Even soft abrasives can go through steel if the • Even soft abrasives can go through steel if the
CT movement stalls out.
8/25/2015 43George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com
Jetting
• Water: May remove softest deposits such as
paraffin, uncured cement and loose rust scale.
• Abrasives: Can remove any deposit but may
cut the pipe.cut the pipe.
8/25/2015 44George E. King Engineering
GEKEngineering.com