CSSGA Overview & the Future of Aggregate Supply in Coloradoand expand the safe, environmentally...
Transcript of CSSGA Overview & the Future of Aggregate Supply in Coloradoand expand the safe, environmentally...
CSSGA Overview & the Future of Aggregate Supply in Colorado
Todd OhlheiserExecutive Director, CSSGA
Feb. 22, 2018
Presentation Agenda
• CSSGA Overview
• Mine Safety Institute
• Construction Industry Coalition
• Aggregates in our Life
• Demand
• Products
• Aggregate Cycle
• Transportation Impact
• Summary and Questions
Colorado Stone, Sand & Gravel AssociationMission
The Colorado Stone, Sand & Gravel Association is the advocate of the Colorado aggregate industry.
We are committed to advancing policies and regulations which protect and expand the safe, environmentally responsible use of aggregates in building Colorado’s economy and infrastructure.
3
Colorado Stone, Sand & Gravel Association
• Representing the majority of the construction aggregate producers in Colorado
• Strongly support alliances with like minded organizations (Strength in Numbers) regarding the Colorado Construction Industry Coalition (CIC with CCA, CAPA, CRMCA and ACPA)
• Aligned with NSSGA regarding lobbying, environmental issues, etc.
• 4 main components:
• Safety (founded Mine Safety Institute in Partnership with DRMS)
• Governmental Affairs (CIC)
• Land Use & Environment
• Education and Community Outreach4
Mine Safety Learning Management System
Program History
• MSHA implemented P-46 training regulations for metal/non-metal mines in 2001
• CSSGA & Division of Reclamation of Mining & Safety (DRMS) partnered prior to roll out of new regulations
• Expanded to include: Task Training, MSHA 101, Annual Refresher, NMT (Spanish)
• Annual Training Materials Competition Award Winners (2000, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2016, 2017)
Learning Management System
• Began discussions in 2015 to updated product to online platform
• Objective: Create an interactive online platform with the ability to train single and multiple users and generate personalized certificates upon completion.
• Project Details:
• $40,000 grant from DRMS and $30,000 from the 2016 program revenue was allocated to the development of the new product
• Project has included content review, content transfer, product review, and product administration
Cost of Product
• Price*:
• 1-10: $130 each
• 11-25: $115 each
• 26-100: $105 each
• 101 and over, call for large group pricing.
• Increase price of DVDs / phase out USBs
*CSSGA members always receive 50% discount
Demo
Construction Industry Coalition Focus Transportation Infrastructure in Colorado
The basic equipment and structures, such as roads and bridges, that are needed for a country, region, or
organization to function properly
Global Comparison
28th in Transportation InvestmentThe Global Competitiveness Report2014-20152.02 Quality of roads
16th in Quality of Roads
National Economic Council and the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.
We Are Not Keeping Pace with Our Neighbors2014 FHWA Pavement Condition:
Source: FHWA Highway Statistics
Utah – 2nd
Kansas –9th
Wyoming – 8th
New Mexico –
16th
Colorado32nd
Colorado Road Conditions Continue to Decline
35 percent of Colorado’s major urban roads are in poor condition:
41 percent in Colorado Springs area in poor condition43 percent in the Denver urban area
12 percent of Colorado’s major mountain and outstate roads have pavements in poor condition:
44 percent are mediocre or fair
Source: TRIP
Poor Condition Defined Signs of deterioration,
including rutting, cracks and potholes. In some cases, these roads can
be resurfaced, but often are too deteriorated
and must be reconstructed.
If we stay this course, we are headed for even slower traffic, longer commutes, less safe roads and
bridges
Trillion Dollar Infrastructure Plan
• Currently no concrete plan has been set forth
• Would require bi-partisan support in a deeply divided political climate
• Impact on Colorado infrastructure funding is unclear
Gas Tax No Longer Sustainable Funding Source
• Federal and state gas taxes have been fixed for more than two decades
• Revenue has steadily declined as Coloradans burn less gasoline in more fuel-efficient cars
• CDOT is taking in 30 percent less money from gas taxes now than it did in 2000 (Source: Inside Energy)
40.4 cents per gallon ➢ 22 cents to state➢ 18.4 cents to feds
Federal and State Gas Tax
Colorado ranks 33rd in the U.S. for gas tax per gallon. Despite costly maintenance due to mountain terrain and extreme weather – our tax is below average. We pay less than Wyoming and South Dakota. (CDOTa)
In Colorado Transportation Not A General Fund Reality
• Transportation just over 5 percent in FY2015-16.
• Health care represents 32 percent of the budget
• K-12 at 21.4 percent and higher education at 14 percent
• Corrections at 5.8 percent.
K1221%
Higher Ed14%
Health Care32%
Corrections6%
Roads5%
Other22%
Proposed Funding Mechanisms
• Increase gas tax
• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax
• Toll roads
• Public Private Partnerships (P3)
• Sales Tax Increase
Aggregate Demand
• U.S. annual production is in excess of 2.25 billion tons (NSSGA)
• Consumption of aggregates:
• 10 tons per person per year (NSSGA)
• Colorado produces about 50 million tons of aggregate annually (USGS)
20
Economic Impact• Colorado aggregate production employment (Phoenix Center)
• Directly Employment: 1,555
• In-Direct Employment: 3,092
• Average earning per industry job were $75,129 in 2016. Well above national average of $61,586 (Phoenix Center)
• Direct tax revenue (Tax Revenue)
• $6,385 on average per employee annually.
• Direct employment contributed $10 million in 2016.
21
Aggregate Industry Contribution
$426M Direct
$873M Indirect
$1.3B
22
Colorado
Economy
Source: Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Policy Studies: The Economic Impact of the Natural
Aggregates Industry: A National, State, and County Analysis
Aggregate Products
Decorative Rock
Sand
Rip Rap
Crushed Stone
Boulders
Light Weight
23
Aggregate Utilization
Concrete
• 80% Aggregate
• Floors and walls
• Concrete pipe
• Tilt Up and Precast Structures
Asphalt
• 95% Aggregate
• Roads
• Shingles
Drainage
• French Drains
• Erosion Control
• Under Drainage, golf course, sport fields
Other
• Armor Stone
• Base for foundations and roads
• Utilities
• Building stone and block
24
Roads and Highways
Typical Asphalt Road
Typical Concrete Road
25
Source: Wikipedia.com
Interstate requires 40,000 tons of aggregate per one
lane mile
Aggregate Production Cycle
Permitting
Quarry Operations
ProcessingSales
Reclamation
26
Aggregate Production Cycle - Permitting
27
• Aggregate Source Identified:– Hard rock: Igneous, Sedimentary, or Metamorphic
– Alluvial: Sand and Gravel
– Quality: hardness, size, shape, chemical properties
– Location to market and transportation system
• Permitting Process– Federal: Corps of Engineer Permits, BLM Contracts, Environmental
Assessments
– State: DRMS, SWSP, Air Permit
– County: Zoning, Special Use Permit
– Municipal: Zoning, Special Use Permit
• Evaluation of Financial Viability
Aggregate Production Cycle – Quarry Operations
28
• Crushed Stone:
– Drilling and blasting.
– Utilize loaders, shovels or excavators to load.
material.
– Haul material by truck or conveyor to the plant.
• Alluvial
– No drilling and blasting
– Utilize loaders, draglines, scrapers, or dredge to
excavate material.
– Haul material by truck, conveyor, or scraper to
the plant.
– When a dredge is used the material is pumped
to the plant utilizing a slurry pump.
Aggregate Production Cycle - Processing
29
• Processing Plant:
– Crushers: Jaw Crusher, Cone Crusher, HIS, VSI to reduce the size
of the material
– Screens: Inclined, flat to size the material
– Conveyors: Transport the material within the plant between
crushers, screens and final stockpiles
• Wash Plant:
– Screens: Wet screens to rinse material, dewatering screens to
remove water
– Log washers or coarse material washers to clean the material
– Sand screws and or classifiers are used to produce sand
– Recycle Water: Settling ponds, clarifiers, or thickeners
Aggregate Production Cycle - Sales
30
• Aggregate Sales Process:
– Material is transported to the end
customer or market by truck, rail,
barge, or ship.
– Material is loaded by loader or load
out bins.
– Materials are scaled by truck
scales, rail scales, belt scales
and/or loader scales.
– Freight Costs often exceed the
material cost when sources are not
close to the market.
Aggregate Production Cycle - Reclamation
31
• Primary Objective: “Return the land to beneficial use”
– Five Rs
• Reform
• Reuse
• Rehabilitate
• Restore
• Recover
• Colorado’s Post Aggregate Mining Benefits
– Water storage: 1.1million ac-ft. of water storage, more than the
proposed Two Forks Dam project.
– Recreation: Fishing and or boating lakes, golf course, and
parks.
– Wildlife habitat: Wetlands or other wildlife habitats.
– Agriculture: Farmland for various crops.
Calhoun Eaton Site – Eagle County
32
During Mining After Reclamation
Future Front Range Aggregate Supplies
• Permitting in the “Rocky Mountains” to produce rock is highly unlikely
• As alluvial material is mined to the east, it is smaller and smaller top size. Where Golden would have boulders, Greeley has approx. 1-1/2 inch and smaller down Platte
• Without new permits, importing material via rail will likely expand, like many major markets
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Po
pu
lati
on
, 00
0’s
Pro
du
ctio
n, T
on
s 0
00
’s
Aggregate Production Population
Colorado’s Front Range Demand
34Source: Colorado Demographics Population Forecasts 2000-2050, Open File Report 00-258, U.S. Geological Survey, Industry Estimates
$-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
0 10 30 50 70 90
Distance from Aggregate Facility, Miles
One Lane Mile of Interstate Highway, 40,000 Tons
Material Cost at Manufacturing Plant Freight Cost
Transportation Impact
35
48%
32%
122%
Pre 1960
1960’s & 1970’s
1980’s & 1990’s
2000’s & 2020’s
2030’s & 2040’s
Hardrock 1970’s – 2040’s
Mining Area Progression
36
Aggregate products can be Cyclical
• Squeegee Gravel - Bigger than sand, smaller than pea gravel
• Generally speaking, it has been a lower demand product of mining S&G material on the Platte River basin
• All material is dependent upon Mother Nature and natural reserves. As mining moves North on the basin, less of this size
• Area inventories over time have been very cyclical. Highly dependent upon projects (demand) and overall S&G production (supply).
Several things have evolved
• Mining is moving North up the Platte and a high percentage of material mined from reserves closer to I-25 (i.e. St Vrain).
• Where the Platte produced over 25% squeegee, reserves to the North produce 20% or less.
• All material was available for bedding as recently as several years ago. Now, some asphalt mix designs consume 25% or more of all squeegee production -making fractured sand.
• These dynamics, plus overall construction demands have greatly decreased inventories
Summary
• Reserves will continue to come from river basins, but further East.
• Coarse aggregates will be quarried and trucked or railed into Front Range.
• There will continue to be long term shifts in products, specs and mix designs.
• The industry is working hard to meet all demands and changes.
• Interact with aggregate producers directly regarding alternatives. CSSGA has no specifics on reserves, demand, production, costs or volumes.
ReferencesAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. 2017 Infrastructure Report Card. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
CDOT(a). Transportation Funding Problem. https://www.codot.gov/programs/environmental/wildlife/wildlife-transportation-summit/mike-vanderhoof_transportation-funding.pdf
CDOT(b). The State of Transportation in Colorado. http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/542022/20344530/1348064410823/CDOT+Infographic+2012.pdf?token=a1vVZ3p5NxpwSrFF0kFP%2FX6lUC4%3D
CDOT(c). Transportation Commision of Colorado Workshops & Regular Meeting. https://www.codot.gov/about/transportation-commission/documents/2015-archive-of-agendas-and-supporting-documents/august-2015/august-full-packet.pdf
FHWA Highway Statistics. Highway Statistics 2014. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2014/
Inside Energy. Why Gas Taxes Won’t Fix Our Infrastructure Problem. http://insideenergy.org/2015/03/04/why-gas-taxes-wont-fix-our-infrastructure-problem/
National Economic Council and the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. An Economic Analysis of Transportation Infrastructure Investment. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/an_economic_analysis_of_transportation_infrastructureinvestment.pdf
NSSGA. How will a 12 cent Increase in the Gas Tax Impact Drivers? http://www.nssga.org/smallchange/
NSSGA. Rocks Build America. http://www.nssga.org/rocks-build-america/
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Policy Studies. The Economic Impact of the Natural Aggregates Industry: A National, State, and County Analysis. http://www.phoenix-center.org/scorecards/AggregatesIndustry2017ScorecardFinal.pdf
Standards & Poor’s Ratings Services. U.S. Infrastructure Investment: A Chance to Reap More Than We Sow. http://images.politico.com/global/2014/05/05/sp-usinfrastructure201405.pdf
Tax Revenue. Based on the average yearly salary of an aggregate mining employee according to Phoenix Report ($75,129) multiplied by Employee paid State Tax (3.2%), Employer paid Unemployment Tax (3.1%) and Employer paid Workers Comp (2.2%).
TRIP: A National Transportation Research Group. Colorado Transportation by the Numbers. http://www.tripnet.org/docs/CO_Transportation_by_the_Numbers_TRIP_Report_March_2017.pdf
U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. Colorado Benefits of the International Affairs Budget. http://www.usglc.org/downloads/states/Colorado.pdf
USGS. Aggregates by State and End Use. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/aggregates/
World Economic Forum. 2014-2015 Global Competitiveness Report. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf