CSPLeatherandFootwear
Transcript of CSPLeatherandFootwear
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
1/63
FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
Version 1 Pretoria January 2007
DIVISION: TRADE AND INVESTMENT SOUTH AFRICA (TISA)CHIEF DIRECTORATE: CUSTOMISED SECTOR PROGRAMMES
ExBo File No. 1 Monday, 25 August 2008
This Sector Development Strategy is not for general dissemination.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 1 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
2/63
the Department of Trade and Industry (the dti), Version 1, January 2007
the dti, Version 2, August 2008
The text in this document (including the dti s logo) may not be reproduced in anyformat or medium. The material must be acknowledged as the dti copyright and thetitle of the document specified.
Any enquiries relating to the copyright of this document should be addressed to the
Leather and Footwear Sector Deskthe dti Private Bag X84PretoriaGauteng0001 (Postal)
12 Esselen StreetSunnysidePretoria0002 (Courier)
Tel: 0861 843 384(the dti Customer Contact Centre)
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 2 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
3/63
Contents
Foreword by the Minister 4
Chapter 1: Introduction 7
Chapter 2: Sector Overview 11
Global opportunities and challenges trends 11 Highlights of leather and footwear value chain 11 Domestic opportunities and challenges trends 17 Wet Blue Tanneries and Raw Hide Agents 17 Footwear Leather Tanneries 18
Chapter 3: Sector Strategic Plan 35
Strategic Vision 35
Chapter 4: Sector Implementation Plan 36
A. Strategic Theme: Competitiveness 37 Key Strategic Challenge: Lack of International Competitiveness 37 Key Action Programme No. 1: Shared Resource Centre 38 Key Strategy Challenges: Ageing Plant and Equipment 45 Key Action Programme No. 2: Upgrading the Technological Base 45 B. Strategic Theme: Domestic Market Development 48 Key Strategic Challenge: Illegal Imports 48 Key Action Programme No. 3: Combat High Levels of Illegal Imports 48 C.Strategic theme: Empowerment 52 Key Strategic Challenge: Transforming the Industrys Profile 52 Key Action Programme No. 4: Promoting Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment 52
Key Action Programme No. 5: Promote Skills Development, Training and Sustainable Employment 54
Chapter 5: Conclusion 59
Summary: Key Strategic Themes and Key Action Programmes for the Footwear and Leather Goods 59Benefits of the Sector Development Strategy 60
Abbreviations and Acronyms 61
Annexure 1 62
Government Websites 62All Spheres of Government 63
Annexure 2 63
Bibliography 63
Page 3 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
4/63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
5/63
This Sector Development Strategy is neither hard, nor fast, nor a formula for instant
success. Instead, we offer it as the basis for continuing to forge constructive engagement
with stakeholders a partnership based on best practice, which must be effective at the
national, provincial and sectoral levels.
Long-standing challenges of competitiveness, exports and investments as well as
employment and equity, will not be solved overnight. However, concrete timeframes to
achieve our aims have been put firmly into place. Maximum co-operation from our
stakeholders is a key condition to achieve our goals within these deadlines. Firmer
benchmarks against which to measure and report progress, have also been developed.
There are mistakes the government should avoid. Any attempt to manipulate the
exchange rate would put our hard-earned macroeconomic stability at serious risk. Whilst
we understand the strength of Rand relative to the US Dollar makes life difficult for our
exporters, in practice we have to recognise that it is not possible for the Reserve Bank to
pursue an exchange rate target at the same time as an inflation target.
Likewise, we reject solutions based on attempts to defend the economy from fair
competitive pressures through restriction on trading with the world or subsidies to
domestic companies. Such actions would detract from the market framework, which
brings major competitiveness improvements. They would also run counter to the World
Trade Organization (WTO) and the benefits it brings to our exporters. As the opposite
side of the same coin, we take robust action against countries that seek to deny our firms
fair access to their markets. Thats why we, in conjunction with other developing
countries, fought strongly for a new world trade round in Doha.
Although Customised Sector Programme is nation-wide, there is an important role for the
provinces, we recognise that provincial leadership is essential in creating dynamic
provincial economies and closing the gap between and/or within provinces. Hence the
importance we attach to the provincial economic departments.
This document has been developed on the basis of discussions within the Customised
Sector Programme Project Team, established by the Department of Trade and Industry
(the dti ) at the beginning of the year, including the positive work of the partnership forged
through the inter-government and external stakeholder workshops. The Customised
Sector Programme must deliver real outcomes, underpinned by real commitment from allstakeholders. Above all we hope that this Sector Development Strategy, and its
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 5 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
6/63
associated Programmes, will form the basis for an even stronger partnership and more
effective action in support of priority sectors in South Africa.
MANDISI MPAHLWA, MP
MINISTER: TRADE AND INDUSTRY
DATE: 12 July 2008
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 6 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
7/63
Chapter 1: Introduction
1. The Minister of Trade and Industry, in his foreword to this document, states:
Priority sectors matter to South Africa. They account for over 22% of the Gross
Domestic Product, employ 23% of South Africas total employment, and contribute
over 55% to South Africas foreign exchange earnings. Therefore, the success of
the priority sectors is critical to our economy and a better life for all. Priority sectors
include footwear and leather goods.
2. In response, using the Customised Sector Programme (CSP) methodology, the dti ,
through Enterprise and Industry Development Division (EIDD), developed this
Strategy for the South African Footwear and Leather Goods sectors, with particular
reference to the following economic aspirations of the government:
Improvement of global competitiveness
Enhancement of exports
Attraction of local and foreign investments
Maintenance and creation of new employment
Encouragement of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment or B-BBEE
(equity)
3. the dti noted that skins and hides are raw materials in the leather value chain that
feed into different sub-sectors such as footwear, automotive, clothing, leather
accessories and furniture.
4. It should be noted that this Strategy only focuses on the leather value chain that
feeds into the footwear and leather goods sectors. It does not focus on developing
strategies for the automotive and furniture sectors. The leather goods sector, forlabour purposes, comprises the manufacture of luggage, handbags and general
goods, such as belts, purses, etc., forms part of the organised leather industry. The
General Leather Goods and Handbag Association is party to the National
Bargaining Council of the Leather Industry of South Africa. The Association
Secretariat does not deal with trade-related issues and lacks industry statistics. It is
a relatively small sector of approximately 90 SMME-type enterprises, employing
about 3,000 workers. It is affected by imports, mainly from China, and has shown a
big decline since the early 1990s. In the last three to four years, there appears tobe greater stability as regards employment, with an increase from 2,500 to 3,000
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 7 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
8/63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
9/63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
10/63
countries, which have the lowest production costs.
o Provides highlights of the leather and footwear value chain, in the
context that leather usage is increasing roughly in line with the growth of
the worlds economy.
Chapter 3:
o Outlines the strategic vision, longer-term direction, key strategic
challenges, and the envisaged KAPs as part of three strategic themes
(key focus areas) that will maximise the impact in achieving the strategic
vision:
Improve long-term sustainable productivity and competitiveness;
Market development; and
Empowerment.
o The selected KAPs should be seen as an integrated plan to assist the
footwear and leather goods sectors to grow and provide employment,
thereby achieving the economic aspirations of government as
highlighted in paragraph 2 above.
Chapter 4:
o Details the sector implementation plan. The KAPs together with
related interventions, which contribute to the strategic vision of the
footwear and leather goods sectors are described in detail.
Chapter 5:
o Conclusion and next steps.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 10 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
11/63
Chapter 2: Sector Overview
Global opportunities and challenges trends
15. The global leather supply chain and footwear industry has restructured significantly
with a geographic shift of production towards those developing countries that have
the lowest production costs. Since leather is the common denominator of all the
three value chains (Automotive, Footwear and Leather Goods) this section presents
the findings of our global research into footwear and leather goods more specific.
16. As a limitation to the study, it has to be noted that global statistics on footwear are
hard to come by. The British footwear research body (SATRA) does maintainstatistics, which are periodically up-dated, but cannot be obtained without costly
contract membership. Thus, the findings for the global footwear industry in this
section are a consolidation of a specially commissioned research by SATRA for the
2001 study on exporting marketing opportunities for the industry, and other periodic
research by SATRA obtained indirectly by Southern African Footwear and Leather
Industries Association (SAFLIA).
17. While the following does not cover all aspects cited by the CSP Manual, the data on
the global footwear industry are perfectly adequate to demonstrate the relevant
trends in the global footwear scene.
Highlights of Leather and Footwear Value Chain
18. Leather usage is increasing roughly in line with the growth of the worlds economy.
Although the so-called developed countries have a higher conversion rate oflivestock to hides, over the past 20 years, production has shifted dramatically to
developing countries, at all levels of the leather value chain:
Livestock;
Raw Hides;
Wet Blue; and
Finished Leather.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 11 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
12/63
19. In 2000, leather usage for automotive seats and trim was relatively minor at 2% of
the total global production, although its share has risen somewhat since then.
However, in South Africa it is the mainstay at over 87% of total leather usage.
20. The footwear industry utilises all types of leather in its production. Heavy bovine ismainly used in footwear for such components as soles as opposed to light, which
is used for uppers.
21. The first stage of the leather chain is the recovery of hides and skins from animals.
Hides and skins are a by-product of farming stock bred primarily for meat
consumption. Thus, hides and skins are mainly recovered from slaughterhouses
and farms. Because the leather industry depends on the recovery of hides and
skins of the farming stock, availability of raw material directly depends on the size of
the animal population, the take off ratio and the weight/size of the hide/skin
recovered.
22. Developing countries outsize developed countries in terms of livestock by between
3 to 4 times. This means that at the beginning of the 2000s, developing countries
held 78.1% of the worlds 1.5 billion head of cattle livestock, and 76.6% of the
worlds 1.8 billion sheep and goats.
23. The conversion rate of animal population to raw hides and skins in developing
countries is far less than in the developed countries. Developing nations only
produced 53.8% of the 5.7 billion tonnes of raw hides, compared to the developed
nations 46.2%. A similar but slightly better picture arises for the conversion of the
sheep and goat population in developing countries. Despite having 76.6% of the
total sheep and goat population, their conversion rate to billion tonnes of world skins
falls to only 67.2%.
24. At the next stage of the leather chain, namely wet blue and finished leather, the
collected raw hides are converted into what consumers recognise as leather.
25. The 15-year production trend of finished leather indicates a general increase in the
global production of all types of finished leather. Global production of heavy bovine
leather increased by 1.2% on average per annum, from 414 billion to 495 billion
tonnes. The production of light bovine leather increased world-wide by 1.4% on
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 12 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
13/63
average per annum, from 9 million feet 2 to 11 million feet 2. Finally, light sheep and
goat leather increased from 3.4 million feet 2 to 4.5 million feet 2.
26. A further indication of the forces of globalisation can be seen in the development of
trade in finished leather by volume. The export volume of the various types offinished leather has increased in both developing and developed countries over the
15-year period.
27. This reflects firstly, the increased specialisation of tanning in certain developing
countries, necessitating their exporting of leather to developed countries or other
developing countries, and secondly, the increased demand for leather in certain
developing countries, resulting in imports from certain developed countries, such as
Italy.
28. Trends in end-use shares:
Increasing Share : Auto (except possibly in Europe, owing to a preference for
textiles) and Furniture bovine.
Static Share : Garments, Other Leather Products mostly non-bovine.
Declining Share : Footwear shift from leather to synthetic leather and other
materials, such as textiles.
29. In 2000, nearly two-thirds of global leather production (66%) was used by the
footwear industry. In South Africa this is far less, as 87% of local leather production
is used in the automotive industry, compared to only 13% of local leather production
available for footwear and other leather.
30. South Africa has always dominated the world ostrich market but several new
players have entered the global industry. South Africa, relative to its size, is themain global ostrich producer next to the USA. It is said that China has increased its
ostrich population. At the same time, the Australian ostrich population is said to
have declined to only 12,000 in 2004. A more recent trend in the ostrich industry
has been the development of ostrich industries in South American countries like
Chile and Brazil, as well as in Eastern European countries.
31. The primary markets for ostrich skins are in Asia (principally Japan) and to a lesser
extent, the USA. South Africa is not the only exporting country to the USA andJapan. In 2000, South Africa controlled over 86% of the Japanese Ostrich market.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 13 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
14/63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
15/63
37. The most impressive development has been made by China, which has increased
its share of world footwear exports, from only 3% in 1979, to a dominating 51% of
total world footwear exports in 1999, and the trend continues.
38. In 1979 the main significant exporting countries were Italy, USA and South Koreawith China being a minor player. By 1999 the picture had changed dramatically. The
USA and South Korea are effectively off the trade map and Italy has experienced
not only a decline in its share of global exports from 22% in 1979 to only 5.2% in
1999 but also a decline in volume from 374 million pairs in 1979 to 347 million pairs
in 1999. The winner of the relocation process has been China. From being a minor
player in 1979 it increased its export volume of 52 million pairs in 1979 to an
impressive 3.4 billion pairs in 1999 thereby increasing its share of total world
exports to 51%.
39. Only Portugal has increased its local production as a percentage of consumption.
This might be explained through re-exporting. Otherwise, especially in large market
countries like the USA, Canada, Germany, France, the UK and Japan, local
production, as a percentage of consumption, has declined significantly through
import penetration of cheaper footwear. Therefore, most footwear manufacturers in
the advanced countries have become either intermediaries between retailers and
production sources from developing countries, market suppliers of relatively price
insensitive niche markets, or developed strategic alliances like the supply of boots
to the US army. Some of these survival strategies are also disappearing as more
retailers start to source directly from the developing countries like China.
40. The main footwear producers are China, India, Italy, Brazil, Thailand, Turkey,
Indonesia, Mexico, Vietnam, Spain, South Korea, Pakistan and Philippines. From
1995 to 2001, footwear production has moved to China. Interestingly though is the
continued presence of Italy as a main producer which can be explained that Italy
has maintained its position as a high quality footwear producer specialising in the
production of high value footwear. Furthermore, countries like Brazil and India
should have seen a similar decline in production but have imposed trade policies,
which allow them access to cheap raw materials (especially leather).
41. It is not surprising that a similar picture develops when one looks at the main
footwear exporters. Given Chinas overwhelming footwear production volume it
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 15 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
16/63
seems to follow logically that China also dominates the export market followed by
Italy, Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil.
42. In terms of importers, following the decline in the percentage share of local
production of local consumption, the main importers are the countries, whichexperienced this decline because of increased import penetration.
43. The Top 7 importing countries show their increasing dependence on imports
primarily from China over the period 1995 to 2001. Even Italy, which is a major
exporter, relies increasingly on imports. This might indicate that some of the
exporting countries are actually only re-exporting which would make them net
importers.
44. The latest available data on the restructuring trend indicates the demise of local
production and exports in the more developed countries, and the rise of the
developing countries (especially China) to fulfil this role.
45. Chinas dominance as the main footwear exporter has increased even further by
32% from 3.4 billion pairs in 2001 to 4.5 billion pairs in 2003. Furthermore, China
(despite a huge population - local demand - and minimal imports) has increased its
exports share as a percentage of total production to 63%. It is also interesting to
note that Brazils footwear industry faces very little competition through imports as
imports are only 2.3% of local production while it manages to export almost 30% of
its local production.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 16 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
17/63
Domestic opportunities and challenges - trends
Wet Blue Tanneries and Raw Hide Agents
46. Because the Wet Blue 1 Segment is a trading segment as well as a productionprocess, it is relatively unaffected by the Motor Industry Development Programme
(MIDP) sales lost in the event of a collapse of the automotive leather chain would
easily be replaced by exports. Further, the drop in price resulting from such a
decline for auto leather would be passed back to source - the farmer - leaving
margins unaffected.
47. The quality of South African hides as been positively influenced by the rise in the
number of feedlots operating in the meat industry, with animals thus spending less
time in the open field. The quality of South African hides is rated to be superior to
other sub-Saharan African and most Asian hides, but inferior to most hides from
Australia, Argentina, the US and Europe. Their relatively small size compared with
the last two origins (3.5 to 4m 2) renders them just marginally suited for upholstery
and automotive leather. Only about 60% of South African hides are regarded as
suitable for automotive leather.
48. It is interesting to note that several Wet Blue processors are owned by local
feedlots/abattoirs, i.e. they have been created by forward integration to meet the
demand for local automotive leather brought about by the MIDP.
49. Prices of hides are higher and rising faster in South Africa than in other countries.
Since 1997 hide prices have increased: 56% in South Africa vs 26% in Germany
and 31% in the USA (Source: SAMIC). This is because of the increase in demand
of local hides caused by the MIDP. The industry is relatively capital intensive.
50. The impact of the MIDP on this segment is twofold:
The increased demand for auto leather made from local hides (to take
advantage of local content MIDP credits) has increased the price of such raw
hides and leather, compared to those, which can be imported.
Were the auto leather to be removed from the MIDP:
The Wet Blue Segment would survive as Raw Hides and Wet Blue are
essentially a world-traded commodity Wet Blue hides would be
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 17 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
18/63
exported rather than supplied to local automotive tanneries, the Chinese
Market representing an obvious export opportunity.
The over capacity in the industry would force down-sizing, especially in
the Eastern Cape which is most dependent on imported Raw Hides.
Footwear Leather Tanneries
51. The Footwear Leather Tanneries are the first dedicated segment for the Footwear
Chain. However, they also provide minor amounts of (bovine) finished to the other
leather chain, (they generally prefer to import their leather requirements). The MIDP
has deprived the footwear sector of access to good quality South African leather at
an affordable price. The cost of a car seat in the overall price of a vehicle is
minimal, whereas in footwear the cost of leather upper is a major cost element inthe overall price of a shoe.
52. The number of tanneries has suffered a decline commensurate with the production
of local footwear. In the early 1990s there were at least seven tanneries, while now
only two remain, one of which is a relatively small concern.
53. Estimated annual turn-over of the footwear tannery segment is R150 million, and it
produces about 1.2 million metres 2 of leather (compared with the 8.3 million metres 2 of automotive leather produced by the five tanneries active in that sector).
54. The value added by this turn-over is approximately R60 million (which represents
41% of sales higher than both wet-blueing and auto leather tanning.
55. The footwear tanneries also supply the leather goods segment with some of their
bovine leather needs (10% of the tanneries output), the rest being imported.
56. The local tanning industry supplies more than half of the leather required by the
Footwear Segment. The balance is sourced by South African Footwear
Manufacturers mostly from India and Brazil, two countries with policies in place to
beneficiate their locally available leather-making raw material (hides and skins) by
applying export taxes.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
1 Wet blue is a semi-tanned skin.
Page 18 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
19/63
57. South African Footwear Leather Tanners operate at 10% to 30% disadvantage in
price compared with the above mentioned competitor countries, India and Brazil,
because these countries restrict exports of their own wet blue leather. Local leather
tanners strategy to counteract this, is to concentrate on non-price elements of the
marketing mix, including quick response, zero-defect and customer service andability to produce short runs (niche marketing).
58. There is duty protection of 10% duty on certain Bovine leathers. All other leathers
enter the country duty free. In contrast, the local Footwear industry has a 30% duty
protection on imported leather shoes.
59. Locally available hides from South African sources are generally too expensive for
the requirements of the local Footwear Manufacturers resulting in approximately
75% of all locally produced grain leather and over 40% of all finished splits being
produced using imported raw material (mostly from elsewhere in Africa as well as
Brazil and Australia). The locally available wet blue splits are derived from the
Automotive Leather Segment.
60. The reason generally given for the high local hide price is the distortions caused by
the MIDP on local hide prices, particularly for better grade material. More cost-
effective sources can be found offshore to satisfy local footwear demand.
61. While the footwear tanneries are dependent on the footwear manufacturers the
latter have the leeway of imported leather as an alternative source. Despite there
being a 10% duty on imported leather, it can still be a cost-quality effective
alternative to the local tanneries to the extent that the research shows that up to
40% of leather used to manufacture footwear is imported, while 60% is sourced
locally.
62. At certain times in the past, up to 20% of South African finished footwear leather
production was exported, mostly to the UK, Asia and Europe. There is at present
very little export trade in South African finished footwear leather due to the strength
of the Rand.
63. Weekly-wage earners pay for 2004 varies greatly by location, from R12, 12 to R17,
14 per hour. The industry is relatively capital intensive, with raw materials being the
largest cost.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 19 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
20/63
64. One company is 100% German owned, while the other is 100% South African
owned.
Footwear Manufacturers
65. Globally, the manufacture of footwear for exports has quadrupled and relocated
from the developed countries to the developing countries. The growth of Chinese
exports is simply overwhelming and makes China the leader in the field as far as
footwear exports world-wide are concerned. The restructuring process of the
footwear industry globally by moving to developing countries generally follows the
economic rationale of the cheapest producer where the relocation cost and the start
up cost of manufacturers are low enough to shift production easily and quickly.
However, higher cost countries such as Italy, Spain, Portugal and others still remainamong the major footwear producers. There is every reason to believe that the
above also applies to the leather goods sector.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 20 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
21/63
WORLD FOOTWEAR PRODUCTION
2006 RANK MILLION PAIRS
China 1 7 980
India 2 790
Brazil 3 560Indonesia 4 475
Italy 5 348
Vietnam 6 340
Turkey 7 275
Pakistan 8 269
Thailand 9 241
Mexico 10 185
Spain 11 182
Philippines 12 145
South Korea 13 130
Japan 14 116
Iran 15 105
Portugal 16 95
Argentina 17 73
Poland 18 71
Tunisia 19 69
Colombia 20 63France 21 60
Romania 22 57
USA 23 50
Russia 24 47
Taiwan 25 41
Malaysia 26 40
RSA 27 37
Germany 28 29UK 29 27
Australia 30 6
TOTAL - 13 641
SATRA/SAFLIA: 2007
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 21 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
22/63
LEADING COUNTRIES FOR
FOOT WEAR PRODUCTION - 2003
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
China India Brazil Indonesia Italy
M I L L I O N P A I R S
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
LEADING COUNTRIES FOR FOOTWEAR
CONSUMPTION - 2003
0
500
1000
15002000
2500
3000
3500
China USA India Japan Brazil
M I L L I O N P A I R S
66. South Africa footwear production up to 1989 remained fairly constant and in excess
of 60m pairs per annum. Up to 1995 production ranged between 43m pairs and
54m pairs. From about 1996, with declines in local production by the formal sector a
shift to informal (or semi-formal) enterprises commenced that has continued up to
today. It is estimated that at present the informal sector in footwear comprising in
excess of 80 enterprises produces as much completed footwear as does the formal
Page 22 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
23/63
sector with over 100 enterprises. In 2006 total footwear produced in South Africa
i.e. including the informal sector, was 37m pairs, generating ex-factory sales in
excess of R3, 5 billion.
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
FOOTWEAR PRODUCTION BY
CATEGORY 2006
3.90%
56.01%26.87%
13.22%TENDER
MENS & BOYS
WOMEN & GIRLS
CHILDREN & INFANTS
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
Page 23 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
24/63
FOOT WEAR PRODUCT ION PER UPPER
2006
63.84%2.95%
23.51%
9.70% LEATHER
FABRICS
SRP
OTHER
CATEGORY OF FOOTWEAR
0
10
20
30
40
50
199 5 199 6 19 97 199 8 199 9 2 000 2 00 1 2 00 2 2 003 2 004 2 00 5 2 00 6
M I L L I O N P A I R S
TENDER MEN & BOYS WOMEN & GIRLS CHILDREN & INFANTS
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 24 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
25/63
DISTRIBUTION OF FOOTWEAR FACTORIES
BY VOLUME OF OUTPUT - 2006
Annual Output Number of Factories
('1000 Pairs)
Over 1000 2
750 - 999 3
500 - 749 8
300 - 499 6
200 - 299 21
100 - 199 25
50 - 99 26
Below 50 104
TOTAL 195
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
67. There has been a fundamental shift from synthetics footwear to leather footwear.
This has given the South African footwear manufacturers a competitive advantage.
68. To meet the onslaught from imported footwear the industry has restructured itself by
introducing a number of survival strategies. This process was a voluntary one
carried out independently by a number of factories and producing different
solutions. What they do have in common is the ability to produce footwear
acceptable in every respect to South African customers and in some cases tooverseas clients. Due to innovation which is employed by stakeholders the local
footwear sector has increased and is providing considerable less job opportunities.
69. China remains by far the biggest supplier of imported footwear to South Africa. In
2006, 127m pairs of footwear were imported into South Africa from China alone.
The balance of 14m pairs was from the rest of the world. The imports from China
were on average R22.17 per pair whilst total imports averaged R 26.73 per pair. Of
the total Chinese footwear imports into South Africa, more than 100m pairs, or 80%,
constitute those of shoes with synthetic uppers.PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 25 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
26/63
70. What is of concern to South African footwear manufacturers is the large volume of
leather uppered footwear imported from China at an average price of R40 per pair
compared with the average price of locally produced leather footwear of R100 per
pair. The volume of leather footwear from China of 21m pairs may seem low incomparison to the total volume of footwear from China but it does represent 70% of
the total footwear produced in South Africa. Moreover, what is of concern are the
rising imports from China of niche market products where South African
manufacturers are competitive. One example is leather safety footwear with steel
toecaps. Imports from 2003, when 24,000 pairs were imported, have escalated to
1,1m pairs in 2006. China accounts for 990,000 pairs of the total imports under that
tariff heading.
71. Below is reflected the 5 leading countries of origin of footwear imports into South
Africa:
FOOTWEAR IMPORTS
Top 5 Countries - 2006
Country Pairs (m) Value (Rm) Unit Price
CHINA 127 2,820 22.11
VIETNAM 4 300 74.16
HONG KONG 2,4 86 36.38
INDIA 1,5 79 53.38
INDONESIA 1,4 97 71.26
OTHER 10 399 39.90
Total 141 3,781 26.82
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 26 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
27/63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
28/63
in terms of South Africas obligations under the Uruguay Agreement of the GATT
55% for non-leather and 30% for leather footwear. On 19 September 1997 import
control on imported footwear from non-WTO countries was imposed and continued
until 20 September 2000. In 2000, duties on non-leather footwear reached 30%, to
bring it in line with leather footwear. At the date of initial publication (January 2007)this was the position with respect to tariff duties on most footwear imports. The 30%
duty is also the bound rate above which it is not possible for South Africa to
increase duties without applying to the WTO.
77. Illegal footwear imports, more particularly the practice of under-invoicing, seriously
undermine the process of customs control and have enormous undesirable effects
for the footwear sector where imports compete unfairly with local products. Illegal
imports of footwear and leather goods has serious negative consequences for the
industry and the broader economy as it leads to loss of market share, job losses,
factory closures, pressure on the sectors competitiveness, damage of brand equity
and undermines attempts by the sector to restructure. It is estimated that the extent
of such imports is anything between 10% and 30% of local footwear production
translating into possible employment losses of up to 10,000. This is a serious matter
for the industry and one that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) seems to
have difficulty in coping with adequately even though it has made a dedicated staff
member available to specifically focus on the problem of under-invoicing in the
footwear sector.
78. Business, labour and government should work jointly to stop the leakages in
customs, such as that caused by illegal imports. The current weaknesses in the
system could be addressed by SARS implementing all possible measures allowed
within the relevant legal framework to fight illegal imports, including the use of
minimum valuations.
79. Footwear exports, like most exports, are influenced by the exchange rate. The fairly
strong Rand during a large period of the last six years bears this out as does the
fact that a weakening in the Rand in 2002 saw South African footwear exports
increase by more than 40% over the previous year. South African footwear
exporters are reasonably competitive in the export market with medium to high
priced footwear and more particularly industrial footwear such as waterproof and
safety footwear and womens casual footwear.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 28 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
29/63
80. The footwear sector operates an export council (South African Footwear and
Leather Export Council) that has been successful in export promotion. 55% of
exports fall in the category industrial footwear and are dealt with outside the ambit
of the export council. The aims of the export council include to create awareness in
overseas markets of the high quality of footwear exports and to promote SouthAfrica as an ethical footwear destination.
81. However, thus far, efforts to promote South Africa as a fair trade destination seem
to have come to very little. Compared to many of its competitors, South Africa has
relatively fair labour standards. This provides an ideal opportunity for South Africa to
promote itself in the European and North American markets as an ethical producer
of footwear and these markets are growing with more customers insisting on
products not made in sweatshops or by children.
82. If South Africa establishes a reputation as an ethical supplier, the industry would
have to guard such a reputation to ensure that companies which do not comply with
bargaining council agreements and labour legislation do not undermine it.
83. Africa is the largest destination of South African footwear exports. In 2006 622 000
pairs of footwear were sold into the rest of Africa, representing 48% of total exports.
Other major countries of destination were Australia, Singapore, UK and the USA,
together accounting for 34% of exports from South Africa. Exports to the UK and
the USA enjoy the preferences in terms of the South Africa-EU TDCA and African
Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Total footwear exports of 1,3m pairs for 2006
represent a decline of 15% compared to 2005.
84. The 5 leading countries of destination of South African exports are reflected below:
L
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
EADING COUNTRIES OF DESTINATION
FOR SA FOOTWEAR EXPORTS - 2006
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
Africa UK USA Singapore Australia
Page 29 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
30/63
85. The footwear industry has embarked on several initiatives to address its problems
including the introduction of flexibility in terms of the operating status of
manufacturers to ensure stability within the sector. An example includes efforts to
restructure the footwear sector collective agreement that came into effect during
2005. Another is the skills audits conducted from time to time that identify skillsneeds. These audits have identified the need for, amongst others, supervisor and
design skills lost due to the decline in the industry.
86. The local industrys design capabilities should be strengthened. This can be done
by greater use of state of the art technology such as CAD-CAM technology and by
attracting and training new designers. Design innovation can assist local
manufacturers to shift to higher value-added footwear and leather goods
products and to develop unique niche products in which South Africa can be
globally competitive.
87. The skills of the South African footwear worker compares favourably with the best in
the developed world notwithstanding, the lack of advanced formal education
brought about as a result of apartheid education policies. At the date of first
publication in 2007, however, shortages were experienced in certain areas. The
CTFL Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA), although having made some
progress with regard to learnership training has not been able, mainly as a result of
lack of funds, to promote footwear skills training. A very high priority in the footwear
sector is the establishment of an institution that would strive to enhance the
productive capacity through training, skills and technology transfer, research, quality
control and innovative solutions that will together enhance the international
competitiveness of the sector.
88. A Shared Resource Centre, as envisaged in KAP 1, is indispensable in taking the
industry forward towards world-class manufacture and optimal global
competitiveness. An important advantage of such a centre would be the opportunity
for manufacturers, both large and small, to work together in sharing resources and
exchanging know-how. Generally, there has been a lack of collaboration at firm
level in the South African industry.
89. The industrys efforts to increase its quality, including that of its exported footwear,
are curtailed by the lack of a national quality standard. The introduction of such astandard can address the lack of consistent quality experienced in some parts of
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 30 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
31/63
the industry. An institution tasked to assist local manufacturers in this area could go
some way to ensure South Africa establishes a global reputation as a high quality
producer.
90. A general increase in quality and a move to more innovative products and designrequire a skilled workforce. Training seems to remain a low priority in most firms,
more particularly Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) who lack the
capacity to provide continuous training to its workers. In some parts of the industry,
skills deficiencies include work planning and process, people management and
training skills among lower and middle level management.
91. This situation is further exacerbated by the lack of a Sector Development Strategy,
particularly a training programme, to guide manufacturers and training bodies such
as the CTFL SETA.
92. Where training exists, this is often not integrated into other elements of human
resource policy to ensure career development and grading based on skills acquired.
EMPLOYMENT
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
93. The footwear sector is the third most labour intensive sector in South Africa and it
needs attention to ensure that the industry has a sustainable long-term future
thereby contributing to employment growth.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 31 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
32/63
94. Wages in the footwear sector are probably in the middle range for factory workers in
South Africa. At the date of first publication in 2007, the highest prescribed rate in
terms of the footwear wage agreement in the leather industry bargaining council
was R1169.74 per week, whilst general workers earn R696.24 per week. Theformal footwear and leather goods sectors have a high level of compliance with
labour legislation. Unfortunately there exists a fairly substantial part of the industry
that ignore the provisions of the bargaining council and possibly even government
legislation including taxes.
95. There is serious doubt whether the local retail sector is too concerned about
compliance issues. They certainly do not insist on local manufacturers obeying
South Africas labour and tax laws, including customs provisions. As a result, in
marketing footwear, retailers do not promote these as fair trade products. In fact, a
fair amount of resistance from many parts of retail was initially experienced with the
introduction of country of origin labelling requirements.
96. Since the start of the nineteen- eighties SAFLIA has financed the biennial Date
Bank Survey and Realst Analysis conducted by the National Productivity Institute
with a view to improved competitiveness through improved performance. The study
provides a system that can measure ongoing productivity changes and the effects
of the interventions over time on bottom line performance. The last study was done
in 2004 and the NPI reported as follows: The footwear industry has consistently
improved since 2000 in order to become competitive with imports from countries
with lower cost structures and more favourable exchange rates than the South
African footwear industry. Cheaper imports also prohibited the local industry from
raising selling prices at the same rate as input prices it is subject to.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 32 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
33/63
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report
PRODUCTIVITY
ANNUAL PER CAPITA PRODUCTIONYear Pairs per Capita
2006 2 7172005 2 2062004 2 4602003 2 3852002 2 4892001 2 2602000 2 1331999 2 0521998 1 9951997 2 1461996 1 9941995 1 948
97. In 2004 the NPI also undertook a Technology Audit on the footwear industry to
establish the state of technology in the industry and to determine how the
technology used in the industry compared to state of the art technology. The results
reflected an average rating of 3.52 for the industry as compared to 5.00
representing state of the art technology. Four departments were included viz.
clicking, pre-closing, closing, and finishing. Clicking fared best at 3.83 whilstFinishing recorded 3.27. The Report stated: It is patently clear that for the South
African footwear industry to become more competitive it will have to invest in these
types of systems (High Technology Electronic Systems) or at least have access to
them through it being made available through a Service Centre that could be part of
footwear and leather goods Shared Resource Centre.
98. Although there are manufacturers that have kept abreast of technological advances
by regular investment in state of the art equipment, many factories, mainly SMMEs,have allowed their machinery to become obsolete thereby jeopardising their
competitiveness.
99. The main reason for this underinvestment is the cost of new technology and
machinery. Often, in an industry, which has experienced the degree of adjustment
seen over the last few years in South Africa, margins remain very low, which makes
reinvestment difficult.
Page 33 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
34/63
100. The footwear sector has the potential to contribute to empowerment in the
manufacturing sector, as barriers to entry are lower than in many other
manufacturing sectors. It has already experienced a significant amount of Black
Economic Empowerment (BEE). However, this progress has not incorporated the
African population significantly. In addition, many suppliers to the industry remainwhite-owned, resulting in a lack of BEE in procurement. The industry is also still
experiencing a lack of higher-level technical and managerial skills among the
previously disadvantaged.
101. The perception of the footwear sector as declining has inhibited participation by
previously disadvantaged and, like many other areas of manufacturing, reduced its
attractiveness to potential BEE investors.
102. There is a general acceptance in the industry that the transformation of the industry
through B-BBEE, provides numerous advantages to the economy and the industry
itself.
103. Indeed, with the introduction of legislation dealing with the concept of B-BBEE,
SAFLIA formally embraced the principle of the application of B-BBEE in the
footwear and leather goods industry.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 34 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
35/63
Chapter 3: Sector Strategic Plan
Strategic Vision
104. Footwear and Leather Goods sector will be one of the most stable, predictable and
profitable sectors in the South African economy. With strong brands, unique
response capabilities and constant innovation it will provide service superior to that
of competitors, provide sustainable, quality employment, training and skills
development and become the cornerstone supplier to its customer.
Key Strategic Challenges
105. Key strategic challenges that retard the sector from achieving the strategic vision
and not resolve themselves optimally, and that there is clear role for business,
government and labour:
Ageing plant and equipment
Low export orientation
Surge of footwear imports
Lack of innovative designs Declining investment in research and development
General lack of continuous training and skills development
Inability of the Industry to attract investment
Impact of HIV/AIDS and down-sizing of industry has led to loss of skilled
labour
Adapting to the short-run character of industry due to limited market size
Inability of the sectors to empower all segments of the black population
Unfair competition due to importation of undervalue goods & false declaration
Loss of quality jobs through casualisation and informalisation.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 35 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
36/63
Longer-term Direction
106. High level indications of the type of activity that will fundamentally transform the
structure of the sectors by addressing the strategic challenges identified above are:
Access to finance and venture capital must be facilitated
Leadership must be provided; cluster culture and teamwork must be promoted
Skins and hides must be beneficiated
Reduction of input cost of leather, soles & raw materials
Focused design and branding initiatives must be developed. This will include
market development
Research and Development (R&D) and technology transfer must be encouraged
to enhance productivity
Focused and coherent approach to skills development and upgrading by aligning
tertiary institutions with industry needs must be supported
Equity must be spread across the South African black population
The current forum of engagement must be strengthened
Chapter 4: Sector Implementation PlanPRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 36 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
37/63
107. It is clear that the interventions required to secure the vision mentioned in chapter 3
of this document encompass a broad set of factors, as well as a focus on the
domestic and international markets. Based on the terminology of the Customised
Sector Programme, the required interventions are discussed in detail within each
KAP.
108. The KAPs are broadly divided into three key strategic themes, namely:
Competitiveness;
Domestic market development; and
Empowerment.
A. Strategic Theme: Competitiveness
Key Strategic Challenge: Lack of international competitiveness
109. The South African footwear and leather goods sectors require a significant focus on
innovation in order to stay competitive. The current status quo within the sector is
low levels of expenditure on Research and Development (R&D), technology and
training compared to competitor countries, which results in poor capacity to
innovate. Innovation is essential to the future success of the footwear and leathergoods sectors.
110. The South African Wet Blue (hides and skins) is historically not competitive in terms
of the price and quality produced by competitors such as Australia, Brazil and Italy.
Prices of local hides are higher than those of competing countries. In addition, the
chemicals used by local tanneries and retainers are more expensive due to high
freight costs that are added to imports. The environment is less friendly for informal
hides suppliers and this is aggravated by a poor veterinary structures as comparedto Europe and USA.
111. Formal and rural farmers are not trained in better livestock husbandry, which
impacts on the quality of hides and skins. Cattle are also not well branded (tagging
IDs, freezing branding) to reduce waste from current 40% unusable material. There
is a need for R&D on better methods to process hides and skins in order to increase
the usage of available hides and skins.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 37 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
38/63
112. Footwear and Leather Goods producers in South Africa require high quality but
cheaper leather, in order to improve their comparative advantage in the global
economy. This has to be coupled with addressing other weaknesses within the
sectors.
113. A key weakness in the South African footwear and leather goods sectors is the
shortage of well-trained and competent new graduates entering the market.
Academic institutions have a low focus on courses related to footwear sector and
poor focus on new products and processes. The footwear industry has a negative
image amongst pupils and students, and the industry is therefore not regarded as
an attractive career. Research study programmes at academic institutions are not
aligned with the commercial realities of industry.
114. An additional area to be addressed is retail and customer requirement with respect
to design, quality and capacity. The purchase of new technology is a challenge for
the industry given the cost of acquiring new technology. This limits the capability of
the industry to effectively implement and maintain state of the art technology.
115. The intervention described in KAP 1 will contribute to improving the competitiveness
of the sectors but would need the implementation of other KAPs as well to be totally
effective.
116. It is recognised that several other issues, such as quality improvement and
innovation, are critical for increasing competitiveness. The Shared Resource
Centre will deals with these issue.
117. The globalisation and the liberalisation of trade accelerated the flow of goods and
ideas amongst nations. This required restructuring of the production and
consumption of manufactured goods. The South African footwear and leather goods
industry needs to find ways to adapt to the new trends that resulted from
globalisation. This will need the involvement of manufacturers, labour and
government to find acceptable ways to put the local industry on par with global
competitors.
Key Action Programme No. 1: Shared Resource Centre
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 38 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
39/63
118. The Shared Resource Centre will be a productively driven, globally competitive, and
outcomes driven service provider that delivers business assistance, technical
support, quality control, research and development, world-class technical and
design skills and technology transfer on a cost effective basis. The Centre would
also assist new entrants to the sector with innovative solutions through anincubation process that would provide for the specific needs of the industry. It is an
ideal opportunity for South Africa to establish itself as a significant force
through this Centre and therefore it is necessary for stakeholders to agree on
scope of this Centre.
119. It is important that a Shared Resource Centre should contribute towards enhancing
these factors. This indicates firstly that the entire industry should support and use
the services of the Centre and secondly that the Centre would fulfil the specific
needs of the industry. The views of the potential users of the Centre are thus central
in the design of the Centre in terms scope, services, and operations.
120. Labour obviously plays an important role throughout the entire process of improving
competitiveness. Labour is one important resource that should be enabled to
produce world-class manufacturing for optimal global competitiveness. World-class
manufacturing also requires world-class technology, equipment, and world-class
human resources with matching skills through the whole process (from market
research and design through procurement, production, marketing and distribution)
in a quest to consistently satisfy customer and client expectations. Appropriate
management and control skills are required throughout the process to ensure cost
effective and globally competitive products and services according to the
requirements of the market.
121. A Shared Resource Centre would certainly not succeed without the wholehearted
support of all the role players in the industry i.e. manufacturers, retailers, labour and
government.
122. Design and product innovation are critical for shifting to higher value-added
footwear and leather goods products and for developing unique niche products in
which South Africa can be globally competitive
123. The proposed Shared Resource Centre can play an important role in ensuringinnovation becomes an integral part of local manufacturing. It can attract young
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 39 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
40/63
people by instituting a youth development programme in which talented designers
and other skilled young people are mentored. It can also ensure better coordination
between designers and manufacturers to ensure that improvements in design
capacity translate into growth in volume output and employment.
124. A major programme of research into new product development and process
technology should be launched under the auspices of the Shared Resource Centre
and other relevant institutions such as the CSIR. Companies should be encouraged
to set aside budgets for research and development in product innovation. This could
be a conditionality set by the government for support given to companies in other
areas of this CSP.
125. Innovative design and products, coupled with a sector-wide increase in quality, will
allow the South African footwear and leather goods industry to distinguish itself from
other countries footwear and leather goods industries.
126. The Shared Resource Centre should therefore also assist firms to improve their
quality.
127. Footwear and leather goods firms can improve their competitiveness by developing
and enhancing strengths in key areas of soft competitiveness, namely in
innovation, quality, creativity and lead-time reductions through engaging in best
practices and continuous improvement. The Shared Resource Centre has a major
role to play in this regard.
The Goal
128. To increase competitiveness by establishing a Shared Resource Centre that
will assist the sector, including clusters.
Obstacles to Implementation
129. Inadequate support for the Shared Resource Centre from all stakeholders
130. Inadequate resources and infrastructure
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 40 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
41/63
131. Lack of capacity of experienced staff to champion and drive the Shared Resource
Centre;
132. Lack of effective product, geographical or supply chain clusters in the sectors.
133. Lack of clear and objective understanding of cluster methodology and the
commitment required
134. Lack of financial resources to sustain clusters.
Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle
135. Providing the sector, including clusters, with both business support and technicalassistance, and incubating world-class manufacturing and design skills
136. Attracting financial support from provincial and local government, international
donors and the private sector for a Centre that delivers on its mandate and to build
clusters in areas where sufficient agglomeration warrants
137. Establishing technical co-operation agreements with the existing international
best pract ise centres especially directed towards capacity building.
138. Setting up common objectives to grow the sector.
139. Identifying new and existing clusters.
140. Provide a cluster secretariat inclusive of a facil itator to assist with the
development and implementation of cluster initiatives.
Levers Required
141. Finances
142. Business, labour and government partnership and buy-in.
143. Advocacy
Resources Required Starting from a Zero Base PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 41 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
42/63
144. Human resources.
145. Financial resources (R1 000 000 per annum per cluster and to fund the Shared
Resource Centre).
146. Adequate skills to manage and offer the courses and services of the centre
effectively;
147. State of the art equipment, tools and techniques;
148. Adequate infrastructure.
Risks and Mitigating Actions
149. Perception of declining trend of the footwear and leather goods industry could
result in the Shared Resource Centre not attracting experienced staff, thus
undermining the intent of this key action programme. However, it is widely believed
that a properly managed Sector Resource Centre will assist the sector to continue
its turn around and become more competitive, which would make employment in
the Sector Resource Centre more attractive;
150. Poor management of the Centre could result in substantial monetary resources
being wasted. Close industry monitoring and support for the Centre are
required.
151. Lack of interest in developing quality products and moving up the value chain by
firms. Successful marketing the Shared Resource Centres quality improvement
programme and creating awareness of the advantages of improved quality can
mitigate this.
152. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreements
receiving support from the Shared Resource Centre. Only companies who comply
with the relevant labour laws and bargaining council agreements should receive
support and funding.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 42 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
43/63
153. The risk in developing and implementing clusters is a lack of cluster culture in South
Africa. Constant training in cluster development will mitigate this.
154. Clusters may not be adequately funded. This will require long term partnerships to
be developed between business and provincial and national government in order foradequate resources to be deployed.
155. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreements
participating in cluster, Only companies who comply with the relevant labour laws
and bargaining council agreements should be allowed to participate in clusters
Implementing Group and Champion
156. Business (champion), labour, the dti , provincial governments, CTFL SETA,
similar existing centre, CSIR, retailers and designers.
Expected Outcomes (potential net economic benefit)
157. Improved education and technical skills in the sector supporting the potential for
higher value added activities within the value chain;
158. Product development and other technical services providing increased scope for
high value added production through the value chain;
159. Development of innovative products and designs and using this as a competitive
advantage.
160. A sector-wide increase in quality.
161. An increased number of South African manufacturers with global standard
accreditations.
162. Improved quality management system capabilities of manufacturers.
163. Job creation
164. Move to world-class competitive industry.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 43 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
44/63
165. Positive link between cluster development and:
Competitiveness;
Employment creation; Skills development;
Export development;
Import replacement;
Sector sustainability;
Investment attraction; and
SMME development.
Key Performance Indicators
166. Number of advanced technical and technological training courses offered by the
Centre, in conjunction with the appropriate further and higher level educational
institutions;
167. Number and quality of students qualifying through the Centre and entering the
industry;
168. Number of ideas commercialised
169. Number of firms including the SMMEs using the Centre and its services, including
linkages with designers, assistance with development of new products
170. Measurable improvements in quality-levels at participating firms, including to such a
level that companies can achieve global standards accreditations
171. Increased production volumes
172. Improved footwear and leather goods trade balance
173. Number of functioning clusters
174. Number of jobs created
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 44 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
45/63
175. Budget line-item created
Key Strategy Challenges: Ageing plant and equipment
176. According to Cabinet Lekgotla of 2005: Access to capital has been a big
constraint in small business development. While several funds and structures
were in place, these needed to be made more accessible. It is a challenge of
implementation.
177. The continued low level of capital investment in the footwear and leather goods
sectors is a major impediment to their future success. The sectors recognise
that a failure to invest has significantly undermined competitiveness. Failure to
secure new capital investment and upgrading the technological base is likely toresult in continued crisis management rather than sustained and sustainable
improvement in competitiveness. Encouraging technology upgrading in the
footwear and leather goods sectors is therefore of great importance to the
success of this Strategy.
178. The purchase of new technology is a challenge for the sectors given the cost of
acquiring new technology. This limits the capability of the sectors to effectively
implement and maintain state of the art technology.
Key Action Programme No. 2: Upgrading the Technological Base
179. This KAP seeks to update outdated machinery and technology by encouraging
firms to invest and employ state of the art technology.
The Goal
180. To improve efficiency and quality through increased investment in technology
and equipment.
Obstacles to implementation
181. Lack of financial resources
182. High cost of new technology
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 45 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
46/63
183. Obtaining the knowledge and skills to effectively implement and maintain state of
the art technology
Interventions to remove obstacles
184. Setting up a funding system to assist the sector to upgrade technology in line with
the goals of this CSP
185. Promoting availability of funding system to ensure participation by firms, including
by awareness campaigns
186. Firms to develop viable business plans to gain access to preferential loans or
investment support, including quid pro quos in relation to governments economicaspirations
Lever required
187. Finance
188. Technology and innovation
189. Training
Resources required (starting from a zero base)
190. Finance
191. Human resources will be required to facilitate the training that is needed.
Risks and mitigating actions
192. Limited use of the scheme by the sectors due to financial constraints and
bureaucracy. To mitigate this risk government should provide public funding to firms
based on viable business plans.
193. Public funding constraints. Government will need to make a commitment to the
technology upgrading.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 46 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
47/63
194. Non-participation in other KAPs by footwear and leather goods companies. This can
be mitigated by linking funding received for new technology and machinery with
participation in other applicable KAPs, especially the KAP on skills training.
195. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreementsreceiving money from government for upgrading machinery. Government should
ensure only those companies who comply with the relevant laws and agreements
receive funding.
Champion and implementing group
196. the dti (Champion)
197. Industry
198. National Treasury,
199. Department of Science and Technology,
200. CSIR
Expected Outcomes (potential net economic benefit)
201. Increase in the level of new technology and equipment within firms
202. Improvement of productivity
203. Improved skills base
Key Performance Indicators
204. Improved technology and equipment profile of the sector, leading to increased
productivity, sales volumes, job security and sustainable job creation, better
products and improved work processes.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 47 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
48/63
B. Strategic Theme: Domestic Market Development
Key Strategic Challenge: Illegal imports
205. The competitiveness measures set out in the Strategic Theme above cannot besuccessfully implemented without providing the industry with some respite from
footwear and leather goods imports, especially illegal and under-invoiced imports,
entering the local market.
206. This will assist the local industry in achieving some success in the domestic market,
which is essential for the survival of the industry and for kick-starting export growth.
Relief from illegal imports would also help lessen the destruction of jobs and
productive capacity.
Key Action Programme No. 3: Combat High Levels of Illegal Imports
207. Illegal imports include activities such as under-invoicing, under-valuation, false
declaration of goods, rerouting via third countries and corrupt payments to customs
officials that are aimed at evading tariffs or other customs rules, and any other
import practices that are not consistent with the law. These imports fall in two
categories: those that are understated in the official import figures and others thatare simply not reflected.
208. Illegally imported goods, inclusive of under-invoiced goods, cost the local economy
jobs. Successfully combating illegal imports can have a significant employment
impact.
209. The proposal of a system of technical guidelines to identify suspect pricing claims,
which would be used by customs agents to identify probable fraudulentdeclarations, is a vital element in combating under-invoicing and fraudulent claims.
This needs to be supplemented with regular internal audits of invoices to identify
suspicious transactions, based in part on price claims.
210. Local industry has for some time cooperated with authorities, including SARS to
address the issue of illegal imports. However, much more work is needed to rid our
economy of this problem. Industry recognises that government alone cannot fix this
and will assist it to battle illegal imports.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 48 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
49/63
211. The space created by curbing the amount of illegally imported footwear and leather
flowing into South Africa can be used to market locally made goods. This would fit
well with the increased quality, design and innovation envisaged for local products
in this Sector Development Strategy.
212. Government, labour and business should identify opportunities to market locally
manufactured goods through marketing campaigns using the label of origin
legislation and through partnerships with the likes of Proudly South African.
213. Government, labour and business should also investigate ways to deal with
counterfeiting and passing off of local brands.
The Goal:
214. To eliminate unfair competition, firm closures and job losses brought about by
under-invoiced and other illegal imports through better law enforcement.
Obstacles to Implementation:
215. Lack of supportive regulations providing SARS with a framework to respond to
illegal imports.
216. Lack of resources and capacity amongst South African and SACU customs officials
to effectively identify and respond to illegal imports.
Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:
217. Government to
Increase budget to SARS to enable it to employ more customs officials to
increase inspections of containers and improve other areas of customs
controls.
218. SARS to
Implement the WTO compliant framework that enables it to effectivelyrespond to both under-invoiced and other illegal imports
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 49 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
50/63
Institute forensic investigations of major importers and, in the event that
they are only agents, of their customers
Criminalise illegal importing, including asset forfeiture
Destroy seized goods
Increase the rate of container inspections
Cooperate with industry, for example taking up offers of training from
industry
Reduce the number of points of entry
219. Business to
Provide resources for SACU customs officials to allow them to effectively
identify illegal imports. This could potentially take a number of forms,
including the provision of pricing models based on South African materials
costs, import values into other major economies and product-specific training
Levers Required:
220. Finances
221. Training
222. Appropriate regulations.
Resources Required:
223. Limited monetary resources would be required to develop the pricing model and a
reference database as the information required should be readily accessible fromindustry and customs departments of other countries.
224. Monetary resources will be required for the relatively extensive training required of
Customs officials. Human resources for training SARS officials in product
knowledge would be provided by business.
Risks and Mitigating Actions:
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 50 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
51/63
225. Too many ports of entry for effective control of illegal footwear and leather goods
imports. This can be mitigated by rationalising the number of ports of entry for
footwear and leather goods imports.
226. Current legal framework is inadequate to deter illegal activities. Convictingtransgressors in courts of law and introducing asset forfeiture in such cases can
mitigate this.
227. SARS unable to effectively monitor imports. To address this risk, resources should
be allocated to a larger sector-specific unit at SARS.
Implementing Group and Champion:
228. South African Revenue Service (champion), SAPS, the dti , labour, manufacturers,
importers, retailers, SDC and the Department of Justice.
Expected Outcomes:
229. Reduced levels of illegal and under-invoiced imports into SACU.
230. Increased revenue collection by SACUs customs agencies.
231. Improved trading conditions for domestic and regional manufacturers, resulting in
increased employment and investment.
Key Performance Indicators :
232. Number of identified under-invoiced and illegal shipments entering South Africa.
233. Number of containers detained due to under-invoicing and other illegal activities.
234. Number of successful criminal prosecutions for illegal importing.
235. Growth in employment, production and market share.
236. Increased customs revenue
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 51 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
52/63
C. Strategic theme: Empowerment
237. The South African footwear and leather goods sectors need a focused BEE strategy
to achieve the B-BBEE of black industries. The BEE strategy will facilitate growth,
development and stability in the economy.
Key Strategic Challenge: Transforming the industrys profile
238. The leather goods industry does not have black people who have ownership and
control of existing enterprises while the footwear sector does not reflect a complete
B-BBEE.
Key Action Programme No. 4: Promoting B-BBEE
239. The transformation of the sectors through B-BBEE, provides certain advantages to
the economy. One of them is the long-term commercial benefit to the participants of
that process. It also provides for non-commercial or intangible benefits where the
participants are working towards a common vision and equal access to
opportunities in the sector. At a public policy level, the promotion of active
participation by black persons in the industry help to realise an important goal of
government and provides further rationale for public sector support for the industry.
240. The footwear sector has the potential to contribute to empowerment in the
manufacturing sector, as barriers to entry are lower than in many other
manufacturing sectors.
The Goal:
241. To adopt, implement and promote the governments Codes of Good Practice
for B-BBEE.
Obstacles to implementation:
242. Perception of the footwear sector as a sunset industry inhibits participation and
reduces attractiveness to potential BEE investors.
243. BEE is concentrating in a certain segment of the black population.
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS244. Availability of capital for BEE transactions.
Page 52 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
53/63
245. Lack of higher-level technical and managerial skills among black people.
Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:
246. The governments Codes of Good Pract ice for B-BBEE-set compliance targets.
247. To monitor and ensure implementation of the governments Codes of Good
Practice, specifically at firm level.
248. Proactive marketing of opportunities amongst potential BEE investors and
potential future employees.
Levers Required:
249. Learner ships to attract future employees
250. Employment Equity Act, B-BBEE Act.
Resources Required:
251. Monetary and human resources to facilitate the activities of the governments
Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE.
Risks and Mitigating Actions:
252. Failure to reach full agreement, or compromising on the central objectives of the
governments Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE. This can be mitigated by
strong governmental leadership and monitoring of codes of good practice.
253. BEE only seen as dealing with ownership structures and not being broad-based. B-
BBEE.
Implementing Group and Champion:
254. Business associations and labour (champions), the dti , Department of Labour.
Expected Outcomes: PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 53 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
54/63
255. Adequately empowered and transformed footwear and leather goods sectors.
Key Performance Indicators:
256. Implementation of governments Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE.
257. Reaching of targets in line with the B-BBEE code.
258. Use of the industry as an example of successful B-BBEE.
259. Number of successful black-owned companies.
KAP No. 5: Promote Skills Development, Training and Sustainable Employment
260. The achievement of this Sector Development Strategys strategic vision depends
largely on highly skilled workforce at operator, supervisor, management and all
other levels.
261. As the local footwear and leather goods industry lacks world-class skills at a
number of levels, it needs a coordinated skills development programme that coversthe full spectrum of skills requirements in support of future growth areas.
262. The main vehicle for the implementation of such a programme will be the SETA.
The CTFL SETA already implements a number of programmes, but is under-
resourced and space exists for an improvement in the allocation of resources and
its current programmes. The SETA must be appropriately resourced and its work
programme aligned with this Sector Development Strategy.
263. This programme should;
Increase the number of employees on accredited training and development
programmes and learnership programmes dramatically to ensure that at
least 15% of the workforce is trained and/or retrained every year, resulting
in a full skills upgrade in the sectors within five years
Address skills bottlenecks, especially in the training of middle management
in work planning, process and people management skills
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 54 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
55/63
Integrate training with other elements of human resource policy. A skills-based
grading system for workers with appropriate rewards to encourage skills
formation, career-pathing and incentives to participate in training programmes
should be developed
264. Without skilled workers and management, this Sector Development Strategy and
many of its projects will not show the desired results.
265. The provisions of employment law and the Bill of Rights in the South African
Constitution govern the South African labour market. Modern industrial relations
machinery exists in the form of advanced conciliation and arbitration systems,
dedicated training institutions and collective bargaining forums in the form of
statutory bargaining councils.
266. The footwear and leather goods industry is characterised by relatively cooperative
industrial relations between organised labour and business. A national bargaining
council exists in the sectors. Nevertheless, some companies do not adhere to
minimum standards of employment.
267. A policy that seeks to base competitiveness on low wages would not be consistent
with South Africas human rights culture or with the goals of this Sector
Development Strategy. On the contrary, sustainable human resource policies will
allow the industry to compete in the market for fair trade products.
268. With an important segment of consumer consciousness favouring ethical sourcing
emerging in major trading partners of South Africa, the promotion of fair trade
practices would constitute a major competitive advantage over certain other
developing country exporters. It would allow the industry to market itself as an
ethical supplier in foreign markets.
269. Sustainable and appropriately remunerated employment also improves the
disposable incomes of families, which in turn feeds into consumption, motivates
employees and results in increased productivity
The Goal:
PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS
Page 55 of 63
-
8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear
56/63
270. To develop a labour force and management corps with world-class skills, able to
work productively in full compliance with labour legislation and under fair labour
standards, and to produce innovative products of world-class standards, through
continuous training.
Obstacles to Implementation:
271. Inadequate financial and human resources for the CTFL SETA.
272. Inadequate systems at the CTFL SETA.
273. Insufficient number of learners on traineeships.
274. Lack of management skills.
275. Coordination between current training and skills requirements.
276. Attempts to bypass and undermine the South African Constitution, laws and
bargaining council agreements in certain workplaces and areas of South Africa.
Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:
277. Government to provide adequate financial resources for the CTFL SETA for
example through the National Skills Fund.
278. Industry developing a strategic plan for the SETA and enhance its capacity to
manage the skills development programme through additional staff and improved
management systems.
279. The industry placing 15% of the workforce through structured learnerships and
accredited training and development programmes on an annual basis.
280.