CSPLeatherandFootwear

download CSPLeatherandFootwear

of 63

Transcript of CSPLeatherandFootwear

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    1/63

    FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

    Version 1 Pretoria January 2007

    DIVISION: TRADE AND INVESTMENT SOUTH AFRICA (TISA)CHIEF DIRECTORATE: CUSTOMISED SECTOR PROGRAMMES

    ExBo File No. 1 Monday, 25 August 2008

    This Sector Development Strategy is not for general dissemination.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 1 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    2/63

    the Department of Trade and Industry (the dti), Version 1, January 2007

    the dti, Version 2, August 2008

    The text in this document (including the dti s logo) may not be reproduced in anyformat or medium. The material must be acknowledged as the dti copyright and thetitle of the document specified.

    Any enquiries relating to the copyright of this document should be addressed to the

    Leather and Footwear Sector Deskthe dti Private Bag X84PretoriaGauteng0001 (Postal)

    12 Esselen StreetSunnysidePretoria0002 (Courier)

    Tel: 0861 843 384(the dti Customer Contact Centre)

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 2 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    3/63

    Contents

    Foreword by the Minister 4

    Chapter 1: Introduction 7

    Chapter 2: Sector Overview 11

    Global opportunities and challenges trends 11 Highlights of leather and footwear value chain 11 Domestic opportunities and challenges trends 17 Wet Blue Tanneries and Raw Hide Agents 17 Footwear Leather Tanneries 18

    Chapter 3: Sector Strategic Plan 35

    Strategic Vision 35

    Chapter 4: Sector Implementation Plan 36

    A. Strategic Theme: Competitiveness 37 Key Strategic Challenge: Lack of International Competitiveness 37 Key Action Programme No. 1: Shared Resource Centre 38 Key Strategy Challenges: Ageing Plant and Equipment 45 Key Action Programme No. 2: Upgrading the Technological Base 45 B. Strategic Theme: Domestic Market Development 48 Key Strategic Challenge: Illegal Imports 48 Key Action Programme No. 3: Combat High Levels of Illegal Imports 48 C.Strategic theme: Empowerment 52 Key Strategic Challenge: Transforming the Industrys Profile 52 Key Action Programme No. 4: Promoting Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment 52

    Key Action Programme No. 5: Promote Skills Development, Training and Sustainable Employment 54

    Chapter 5: Conclusion 59

    Summary: Key Strategic Themes and Key Action Programmes for the Footwear and Leather Goods 59Benefits of the Sector Development Strategy 60

    Abbreviations and Acronyms 61

    Annexure 1 62

    Government Websites 62All Spheres of Government 63

    Annexure 2 63

    Bibliography 63

    Page 3 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    4/63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    5/63

    This Sector Development Strategy is neither hard, nor fast, nor a formula for instant

    success. Instead, we offer it as the basis for continuing to forge constructive engagement

    with stakeholders a partnership based on best practice, which must be effective at the

    national, provincial and sectoral levels.

    Long-standing challenges of competitiveness, exports and investments as well as

    employment and equity, will not be solved overnight. However, concrete timeframes to

    achieve our aims have been put firmly into place. Maximum co-operation from our

    stakeholders is a key condition to achieve our goals within these deadlines. Firmer

    benchmarks against which to measure and report progress, have also been developed.

    There are mistakes the government should avoid. Any attempt to manipulate the

    exchange rate would put our hard-earned macroeconomic stability at serious risk. Whilst

    we understand the strength of Rand relative to the US Dollar makes life difficult for our

    exporters, in practice we have to recognise that it is not possible for the Reserve Bank to

    pursue an exchange rate target at the same time as an inflation target.

    Likewise, we reject solutions based on attempts to defend the economy from fair

    competitive pressures through restriction on trading with the world or subsidies to

    domestic companies. Such actions would detract from the market framework, which

    brings major competitiveness improvements. They would also run counter to the World

    Trade Organization (WTO) and the benefits it brings to our exporters. As the opposite

    side of the same coin, we take robust action against countries that seek to deny our firms

    fair access to their markets. Thats why we, in conjunction with other developing

    countries, fought strongly for a new world trade round in Doha.

    Although Customised Sector Programme is nation-wide, there is an important role for the

    provinces, we recognise that provincial leadership is essential in creating dynamic

    provincial economies and closing the gap between and/or within provinces. Hence the

    importance we attach to the provincial economic departments.

    This document has been developed on the basis of discussions within the Customised

    Sector Programme Project Team, established by the Department of Trade and Industry

    (the dti ) at the beginning of the year, including the positive work of the partnership forged

    through the inter-government and external stakeholder workshops. The Customised

    Sector Programme must deliver real outcomes, underpinned by real commitment from allstakeholders. Above all we hope that this Sector Development Strategy, and its

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 5 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    6/63

    associated Programmes, will form the basis for an even stronger partnership and more

    effective action in support of priority sectors in South Africa.

    MANDISI MPAHLWA, MP

    MINISTER: TRADE AND INDUSTRY

    DATE: 12 July 2008

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 6 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    7/63

    Chapter 1: Introduction

    1. The Minister of Trade and Industry, in his foreword to this document, states:

    Priority sectors matter to South Africa. They account for over 22% of the Gross

    Domestic Product, employ 23% of South Africas total employment, and contribute

    over 55% to South Africas foreign exchange earnings. Therefore, the success of

    the priority sectors is critical to our economy and a better life for all. Priority sectors

    include footwear and leather goods.

    2. In response, using the Customised Sector Programme (CSP) methodology, the dti ,

    through Enterprise and Industry Development Division (EIDD), developed this

    Strategy for the South African Footwear and Leather Goods sectors, with particular

    reference to the following economic aspirations of the government:

    Improvement of global competitiveness

    Enhancement of exports

    Attraction of local and foreign investments

    Maintenance and creation of new employment

    Encouragement of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment or B-BBEE

    (equity)

    3. the dti noted that skins and hides are raw materials in the leather value chain that

    feed into different sub-sectors such as footwear, automotive, clothing, leather

    accessories and furniture.

    4. It should be noted that this Strategy only focuses on the leather value chain that

    feeds into the footwear and leather goods sectors. It does not focus on developing

    strategies for the automotive and furniture sectors. The leather goods sector, forlabour purposes, comprises the manufacture of luggage, handbags and general

    goods, such as belts, purses, etc., forms part of the organised leather industry. The

    General Leather Goods and Handbag Association is party to the National

    Bargaining Council of the Leather Industry of South Africa. The Association

    Secretariat does not deal with trade-related issues and lacks industry statistics. It is

    a relatively small sector of approximately 90 SMME-type enterprises, employing

    about 3,000 workers. It is affected by imports, mainly from China, and has shown a

    big decline since the early 1990s. In the last three to four years, there appears tobe greater stability as regards employment, with an increase from 2,500 to 3,000

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 7 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    8/63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    9/63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    10/63

    countries, which have the lowest production costs.

    o Provides highlights of the leather and footwear value chain, in the

    context that leather usage is increasing roughly in line with the growth of

    the worlds economy.

    Chapter 3:

    o Outlines the strategic vision, longer-term direction, key strategic

    challenges, and the envisaged KAPs as part of three strategic themes

    (key focus areas) that will maximise the impact in achieving the strategic

    vision:

    Improve long-term sustainable productivity and competitiveness;

    Market development; and

    Empowerment.

    o The selected KAPs should be seen as an integrated plan to assist the

    footwear and leather goods sectors to grow and provide employment,

    thereby achieving the economic aspirations of government as

    highlighted in paragraph 2 above.

    Chapter 4:

    o Details the sector implementation plan. The KAPs together with

    related interventions, which contribute to the strategic vision of the

    footwear and leather goods sectors are described in detail.

    Chapter 5:

    o Conclusion and next steps.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 10 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    11/63

    Chapter 2: Sector Overview

    Global opportunities and challenges trends

    15. The global leather supply chain and footwear industry has restructured significantly

    with a geographic shift of production towards those developing countries that have

    the lowest production costs. Since leather is the common denominator of all the

    three value chains (Automotive, Footwear and Leather Goods) this section presents

    the findings of our global research into footwear and leather goods more specific.

    16. As a limitation to the study, it has to be noted that global statistics on footwear are

    hard to come by. The British footwear research body (SATRA) does maintainstatistics, which are periodically up-dated, but cannot be obtained without costly

    contract membership. Thus, the findings for the global footwear industry in this

    section are a consolidation of a specially commissioned research by SATRA for the

    2001 study on exporting marketing opportunities for the industry, and other periodic

    research by SATRA obtained indirectly by Southern African Footwear and Leather

    Industries Association (SAFLIA).

    17. While the following does not cover all aspects cited by the CSP Manual, the data on

    the global footwear industry are perfectly adequate to demonstrate the relevant

    trends in the global footwear scene.

    Highlights of Leather and Footwear Value Chain

    18. Leather usage is increasing roughly in line with the growth of the worlds economy.

    Although the so-called developed countries have a higher conversion rate oflivestock to hides, over the past 20 years, production has shifted dramatically to

    developing countries, at all levels of the leather value chain:

    Livestock;

    Raw Hides;

    Wet Blue; and

    Finished Leather.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 11 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    12/63

    19. In 2000, leather usage for automotive seats and trim was relatively minor at 2% of

    the total global production, although its share has risen somewhat since then.

    However, in South Africa it is the mainstay at over 87% of total leather usage.

    20. The footwear industry utilises all types of leather in its production. Heavy bovine ismainly used in footwear for such components as soles as opposed to light, which

    is used for uppers.

    21. The first stage of the leather chain is the recovery of hides and skins from animals.

    Hides and skins are a by-product of farming stock bred primarily for meat

    consumption. Thus, hides and skins are mainly recovered from slaughterhouses

    and farms. Because the leather industry depends on the recovery of hides and

    skins of the farming stock, availability of raw material directly depends on the size of

    the animal population, the take off ratio and the weight/size of the hide/skin

    recovered.

    22. Developing countries outsize developed countries in terms of livestock by between

    3 to 4 times. This means that at the beginning of the 2000s, developing countries

    held 78.1% of the worlds 1.5 billion head of cattle livestock, and 76.6% of the

    worlds 1.8 billion sheep and goats.

    23. The conversion rate of animal population to raw hides and skins in developing

    countries is far less than in the developed countries. Developing nations only

    produced 53.8% of the 5.7 billion tonnes of raw hides, compared to the developed

    nations 46.2%. A similar but slightly better picture arises for the conversion of the

    sheep and goat population in developing countries. Despite having 76.6% of the

    total sheep and goat population, their conversion rate to billion tonnes of world skins

    falls to only 67.2%.

    24. At the next stage of the leather chain, namely wet blue and finished leather, the

    collected raw hides are converted into what consumers recognise as leather.

    25. The 15-year production trend of finished leather indicates a general increase in the

    global production of all types of finished leather. Global production of heavy bovine

    leather increased by 1.2% on average per annum, from 414 billion to 495 billion

    tonnes. The production of light bovine leather increased world-wide by 1.4% on

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 12 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    13/63

    average per annum, from 9 million feet 2 to 11 million feet 2. Finally, light sheep and

    goat leather increased from 3.4 million feet 2 to 4.5 million feet 2.

    26. A further indication of the forces of globalisation can be seen in the development of

    trade in finished leather by volume. The export volume of the various types offinished leather has increased in both developing and developed countries over the

    15-year period.

    27. This reflects firstly, the increased specialisation of tanning in certain developing

    countries, necessitating their exporting of leather to developed countries or other

    developing countries, and secondly, the increased demand for leather in certain

    developing countries, resulting in imports from certain developed countries, such as

    Italy.

    28. Trends in end-use shares:

    Increasing Share : Auto (except possibly in Europe, owing to a preference for

    textiles) and Furniture bovine.

    Static Share : Garments, Other Leather Products mostly non-bovine.

    Declining Share : Footwear shift from leather to synthetic leather and other

    materials, such as textiles.

    29. In 2000, nearly two-thirds of global leather production (66%) was used by the

    footwear industry. In South Africa this is far less, as 87% of local leather production

    is used in the automotive industry, compared to only 13% of local leather production

    available for footwear and other leather.

    30. South Africa has always dominated the world ostrich market but several new

    players have entered the global industry. South Africa, relative to its size, is themain global ostrich producer next to the USA. It is said that China has increased its

    ostrich population. At the same time, the Australian ostrich population is said to

    have declined to only 12,000 in 2004. A more recent trend in the ostrich industry

    has been the development of ostrich industries in South American countries like

    Chile and Brazil, as well as in Eastern European countries.

    31. The primary markets for ostrich skins are in Asia (principally Japan) and to a lesser

    extent, the USA. South Africa is not the only exporting country to the USA andJapan. In 2000, South Africa controlled over 86% of the Japanese Ostrich market.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 13 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    14/63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    15/63

    37. The most impressive development has been made by China, which has increased

    its share of world footwear exports, from only 3% in 1979, to a dominating 51% of

    total world footwear exports in 1999, and the trend continues.

    38. In 1979 the main significant exporting countries were Italy, USA and South Koreawith China being a minor player. By 1999 the picture had changed dramatically. The

    USA and South Korea are effectively off the trade map and Italy has experienced

    not only a decline in its share of global exports from 22% in 1979 to only 5.2% in

    1999 but also a decline in volume from 374 million pairs in 1979 to 347 million pairs

    in 1999. The winner of the relocation process has been China. From being a minor

    player in 1979 it increased its export volume of 52 million pairs in 1979 to an

    impressive 3.4 billion pairs in 1999 thereby increasing its share of total world

    exports to 51%.

    39. Only Portugal has increased its local production as a percentage of consumption.

    This might be explained through re-exporting. Otherwise, especially in large market

    countries like the USA, Canada, Germany, France, the UK and Japan, local

    production, as a percentage of consumption, has declined significantly through

    import penetration of cheaper footwear. Therefore, most footwear manufacturers in

    the advanced countries have become either intermediaries between retailers and

    production sources from developing countries, market suppliers of relatively price

    insensitive niche markets, or developed strategic alliances like the supply of boots

    to the US army. Some of these survival strategies are also disappearing as more

    retailers start to source directly from the developing countries like China.

    40. The main footwear producers are China, India, Italy, Brazil, Thailand, Turkey,

    Indonesia, Mexico, Vietnam, Spain, South Korea, Pakistan and Philippines. From

    1995 to 2001, footwear production has moved to China. Interestingly though is the

    continued presence of Italy as a main producer which can be explained that Italy

    has maintained its position as a high quality footwear producer specialising in the

    production of high value footwear. Furthermore, countries like Brazil and India

    should have seen a similar decline in production but have imposed trade policies,

    which allow them access to cheap raw materials (especially leather).

    41. It is not surprising that a similar picture develops when one looks at the main

    footwear exporters. Given Chinas overwhelming footwear production volume it

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 15 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    16/63

    seems to follow logically that China also dominates the export market followed by

    Italy, Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil.

    42. In terms of importers, following the decline in the percentage share of local

    production of local consumption, the main importers are the countries, whichexperienced this decline because of increased import penetration.

    43. The Top 7 importing countries show their increasing dependence on imports

    primarily from China over the period 1995 to 2001. Even Italy, which is a major

    exporter, relies increasingly on imports. This might indicate that some of the

    exporting countries are actually only re-exporting which would make them net

    importers.

    44. The latest available data on the restructuring trend indicates the demise of local

    production and exports in the more developed countries, and the rise of the

    developing countries (especially China) to fulfil this role.

    45. Chinas dominance as the main footwear exporter has increased even further by

    32% from 3.4 billion pairs in 2001 to 4.5 billion pairs in 2003. Furthermore, China

    (despite a huge population - local demand - and minimal imports) has increased its

    exports share as a percentage of total production to 63%. It is also interesting to

    note that Brazils footwear industry faces very little competition through imports as

    imports are only 2.3% of local production while it manages to export almost 30% of

    its local production.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 16 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    17/63

    Domestic opportunities and challenges - trends

    Wet Blue Tanneries and Raw Hide Agents

    46. Because the Wet Blue 1 Segment is a trading segment as well as a productionprocess, it is relatively unaffected by the Motor Industry Development Programme

    (MIDP) sales lost in the event of a collapse of the automotive leather chain would

    easily be replaced by exports. Further, the drop in price resulting from such a

    decline for auto leather would be passed back to source - the farmer - leaving

    margins unaffected.

    47. The quality of South African hides as been positively influenced by the rise in the

    number of feedlots operating in the meat industry, with animals thus spending less

    time in the open field. The quality of South African hides is rated to be superior to

    other sub-Saharan African and most Asian hides, but inferior to most hides from

    Australia, Argentina, the US and Europe. Their relatively small size compared with

    the last two origins (3.5 to 4m 2) renders them just marginally suited for upholstery

    and automotive leather. Only about 60% of South African hides are regarded as

    suitable for automotive leather.

    48. It is interesting to note that several Wet Blue processors are owned by local

    feedlots/abattoirs, i.e. they have been created by forward integration to meet the

    demand for local automotive leather brought about by the MIDP.

    49. Prices of hides are higher and rising faster in South Africa than in other countries.

    Since 1997 hide prices have increased: 56% in South Africa vs 26% in Germany

    and 31% in the USA (Source: SAMIC). This is because of the increase in demand

    of local hides caused by the MIDP. The industry is relatively capital intensive.

    50. The impact of the MIDP on this segment is twofold:

    The increased demand for auto leather made from local hides (to take

    advantage of local content MIDP credits) has increased the price of such raw

    hides and leather, compared to those, which can be imported.

    Were the auto leather to be removed from the MIDP:

    The Wet Blue Segment would survive as Raw Hides and Wet Blue are

    essentially a world-traded commodity Wet Blue hides would be

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 17 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    18/63

    exported rather than supplied to local automotive tanneries, the Chinese

    Market representing an obvious export opportunity.

    The over capacity in the industry would force down-sizing, especially in

    the Eastern Cape which is most dependent on imported Raw Hides.

    Footwear Leather Tanneries

    51. The Footwear Leather Tanneries are the first dedicated segment for the Footwear

    Chain. However, they also provide minor amounts of (bovine) finished to the other

    leather chain, (they generally prefer to import their leather requirements). The MIDP

    has deprived the footwear sector of access to good quality South African leather at

    an affordable price. The cost of a car seat in the overall price of a vehicle is

    minimal, whereas in footwear the cost of leather upper is a major cost element inthe overall price of a shoe.

    52. The number of tanneries has suffered a decline commensurate with the production

    of local footwear. In the early 1990s there were at least seven tanneries, while now

    only two remain, one of which is a relatively small concern.

    53. Estimated annual turn-over of the footwear tannery segment is R150 million, and it

    produces about 1.2 million metres 2 of leather (compared with the 8.3 million metres 2 of automotive leather produced by the five tanneries active in that sector).

    54. The value added by this turn-over is approximately R60 million (which represents

    41% of sales higher than both wet-blueing and auto leather tanning.

    55. The footwear tanneries also supply the leather goods segment with some of their

    bovine leather needs (10% of the tanneries output), the rest being imported.

    56. The local tanning industry supplies more than half of the leather required by the

    Footwear Segment. The balance is sourced by South African Footwear

    Manufacturers mostly from India and Brazil, two countries with policies in place to

    beneficiate their locally available leather-making raw material (hides and skins) by

    applying export taxes.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    1 Wet blue is a semi-tanned skin.

    Page 18 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    19/63

    57. South African Footwear Leather Tanners operate at 10% to 30% disadvantage in

    price compared with the above mentioned competitor countries, India and Brazil,

    because these countries restrict exports of their own wet blue leather. Local leather

    tanners strategy to counteract this, is to concentrate on non-price elements of the

    marketing mix, including quick response, zero-defect and customer service andability to produce short runs (niche marketing).

    58. There is duty protection of 10% duty on certain Bovine leathers. All other leathers

    enter the country duty free. In contrast, the local Footwear industry has a 30% duty

    protection on imported leather shoes.

    59. Locally available hides from South African sources are generally too expensive for

    the requirements of the local Footwear Manufacturers resulting in approximately

    75% of all locally produced grain leather and over 40% of all finished splits being

    produced using imported raw material (mostly from elsewhere in Africa as well as

    Brazil and Australia). The locally available wet blue splits are derived from the

    Automotive Leather Segment.

    60. The reason generally given for the high local hide price is the distortions caused by

    the MIDP on local hide prices, particularly for better grade material. More cost-

    effective sources can be found offshore to satisfy local footwear demand.

    61. While the footwear tanneries are dependent on the footwear manufacturers the

    latter have the leeway of imported leather as an alternative source. Despite there

    being a 10% duty on imported leather, it can still be a cost-quality effective

    alternative to the local tanneries to the extent that the research shows that up to

    40% of leather used to manufacture footwear is imported, while 60% is sourced

    locally.

    62. At certain times in the past, up to 20% of South African finished footwear leather

    production was exported, mostly to the UK, Asia and Europe. There is at present

    very little export trade in South African finished footwear leather due to the strength

    of the Rand.

    63. Weekly-wage earners pay for 2004 varies greatly by location, from R12, 12 to R17,

    14 per hour. The industry is relatively capital intensive, with raw materials being the

    largest cost.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 19 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    20/63

    64. One company is 100% German owned, while the other is 100% South African

    owned.

    Footwear Manufacturers

    65. Globally, the manufacture of footwear for exports has quadrupled and relocated

    from the developed countries to the developing countries. The growth of Chinese

    exports is simply overwhelming and makes China the leader in the field as far as

    footwear exports world-wide are concerned. The restructuring process of the

    footwear industry globally by moving to developing countries generally follows the

    economic rationale of the cheapest producer where the relocation cost and the start

    up cost of manufacturers are low enough to shift production easily and quickly.

    However, higher cost countries such as Italy, Spain, Portugal and others still remainamong the major footwear producers. There is every reason to believe that the

    above also applies to the leather goods sector.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 20 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    21/63

    WORLD FOOTWEAR PRODUCTION

    2006 RANK MILLION PAIRS

    China 1 7 980

    India 2 790

    Brazil 3 560Indonesia 4 475

    Italy 5 348

    Vietnam 6 340

    Turkey 7 275

    Pakistan 8 269

    Thailand 9 241

    Mexico 10 185

    Spain 11 182

    Philippines 12 145

    South Korea 13 130

    Japan 14 116

    Iran 15 105

    Portugal 16 95

    Argentina 17 73

    Poland 18 71

    Tunisia 19 69

    Colombia 20 63France 21 60

    Romania 22 57

    USA 23 50

    Russia 24 47

    Taiwan 25 41

    Malaysia 26 40

    RSA 27 37

    Germany 28 29UK 29 27

    Australia 30 6

    TOTAL - 13 641

    SATRA/SAFLIA: 2007

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 21 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    22/63

    LEADING COUNTRIES FOR

    FOOT WEAR PRODUCTION - 2003

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    China India Brazil Indonesia Italy

    M I L L I O N P A I R S

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    LEADING COUNTRIES FOR FOOTWEAR

    CONSUMPTION - 2003

    0

    500

    1000

    15002000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    China USA India Japan Brazil

    M I L L I O N P A I R S

    66. South Africa footwear production up to 1989 remained fairly constant and in excess

    of 60m pairs per annum. Up to 1995 production ranged between 43m pairs and

    54m pairs. From about 1996, with declines in local production by the formal sector a

    shift to informal (or semi-formal) enterprises commenced that has continued up to

    today. It is estimated that at present the informal sector in footwear comprising in

    excess of 80 enterprises produces as much completed footwear as does the formal

    Page 22 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    23/63

    sector with over 100 enterprises. In 2006 total footwear produced in South Africa

    i.e. including the informal sector, was 37m pairs, generating ex-factory sales in

    excess of R3, 5 billion.

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    FOOTWEAR PRODUCTION BY

    CATEGORY 2006

    3.90%

    56.01%26.87%

    13.22%TENDER

    MENS & BOYS

    WOMEN & GIRLS

    CHILDREN & INFANTS

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    Page 23 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    24/63

    FOOT WEAR PRODUCT ION PER UPPER

    2006

    63.84%2.95%

    23.51%

    9.70% LEATHER

    FABRICS

    SRP

    OTHER

    CATEGORY OF FOOTWEAR

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    199 5 199 6 19 97 199 8 199 9 2 000 2 00 1 2 00 2 2 003 2 004 2 00 5 2 00 6

    M I L L I O N P A I R S

    TENDER MEN & BOYS WOMEN & GIRLS CHILDREN & INFANTS

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 24 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    25/63

    DISTRIBUTION OF FOOTWEAR FACTORIES

    BY VOLUME OF OUTPUT - 2006

    Annual Output Number of Factories

    ('1000 Pairs)

    Over 1000 2

    750 - 999 3

    500 - 749 8

    300 - 499 6

    200 - 299 21

    100 - 199 25

    50 - 99 26

    Below 50 104

    TOTAL 195

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    67. There has been a fundamental shift from synthetics footwear to leather footwear.

    This has given the South African footwear manufacturers a competitive advantage.

    68. To meet the onslaught from imported footwear the industry has restructured itself by

    introducing a number of survival strategies. This process was a voluntary one

    carried out independently by a number of factories and producing different

    solutions. What they do have in common is the ability to produce footwear

    acceptable in every respect to South African customers and in some cases tooverseas clients. Due to innovation which is employed by stakeholders the local

    footwear sector has increased and is providing considerable less job opportunities.

    69. China remains by far the biggest supplier of imported footwear to South Africa. In

    2006, 127m pairs of footwear were imported into South Africa from China alone.

    The balance of 14m pairs was from the rest of the world. The imports from China

    were on average R22.17 per pair whilst total imports averaged R 26.73 per pair. Of

    the total Chinese footwear imports into South Africa, more than 100m pairs, or 80%,

    constitute those of shoes with synthetic uppers.PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 25 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    26/63

    70. What is of concern to South African footwear manufacturers is the large volume of

    leather uppered footwear imported from China at an average price of R40 per pair

    compared with the average price of locally produced leather footwear of R100 per

    pair. The volume of leather footwear from China of 21m pairs may seem low incomparison to the total volume of footwear from China but it does represent 70% of

    the total footwear produced in South Africa. Moreover, what is of concern are the

    rising imports from China of niche market products where South African

    manufacturers are competitive. One example is leather safety footwear with steel

    toecaps. Imports from 2003, when 24,000 pairs were imported, have escalated to

    1,1m pairs in 2006. China accounts for 990,000 pairs of the total imports under that

    tariff heading.

    71. Below is reflected the 5 leading countries of origin of footwear imports into South

    Africa:

    FOOTWEAR IMPORTS

    Top 5 Countries - 2006

    Country Pairs (m) Value (Rm) Unit Price

    CHINA 127 2,820 22.11

    VIETNAM 4 300 74.16

    HONG KONG 2,4 86 36.38

    INDIA 1,5 79 53.38

    INDONESIA 1,4 97 71.26

    OTHER 10 399 39.90

    Total 141 3,781 26.82

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 26 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    27/63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    28/63

    in terms of South Africas obligations under the Uruguay Agreement of the GATT

    55% for non-leather and 30% for leather footwear. On 19 September 1997 import

    control on imported footwear from non-WTO countries was imposed and continued

    until 20 September 2000. In 2000, duties on non-leather footwear reached 30%, to

    bring it in line with leather footwear. At the date of initial publication (January 2007)this was the position with respect to tariff duties on most footwear imports. The 30%

    duty is also the bound rate above which it is not possible for South Africa to

    increase duties without applying to the WTO.

    77. Illegal footwear imports, more particularly the practice of under-invoicing, seriously

    undermine the process of customs control and have enormous undesirable effects

    for the footwear sector where imports compete unfairly with local products. Illegal

    imports of footwear and leather goods has serious negative consequences for the

    industry and the broader economy as it leads to loss of market share, job losses,

    factory closures, pressure on the sectors competitiveness, damage of brand equity

    and undermines attempts by the sector to restructure. It is estimated that the extent

    of such imports is anything between 10% and 30% of local footwear production

    translating into possible employment losses of up to 10,000. This is a serious matter

    for the industry and one that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) seems to

    have difficulty in coping with adequately even though it has made a dedicated staff

    member available to specifically focus on the problem of under-invoicing in the

    footwear sector.

    78. Business, labour and government should work jointly to stop the leakages in

    customs, such as that caused by illegal imports. The current weaknesses in the

    system could be addressed by SARS implementing all possible measures allowed

    within the relevant legal framework to fight illegal imports, including the use of

    minimum valuations.

    79. Footwear exports, like most exports, are influenced by the exchange rate. The fairly

    strong Rand during a large period of the last six years bears this out as does the

    fact that a weakening in the Rand in 2002 saw South African footwear exports

    increase by more than 40% over the previous year. South African footwear

    exporters are reasonably competitive in the export market with medium to high

    priced footwear and more particularly industrial footwear such as waterproof and

    safety footwear and womens casual footwear.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 28 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    29/63

    80. The footwear sector operates an export council (South African Footwear and

    Leather Export Council) that has been successful in export promotion. 55% of

    exports fall in the category industrial footwear and are dealt with outside the ambit

    of the export council. The aims of the export council include to create awareness in

    overseas markets of the high quality of footwear exports and to promote SouthAfrica as an ethical footwear destination.

    81. However, thus far, efforts to promote South Africa as a fair trade destination seem

    to have come to very little. Compared to many of its competitors, South Africa has

    relatively fair labour standards. This provides an ideal opportunity for South Africa to

    promote itself in the European and North American markets as an ethical producer

    of footwear and these markets are growing with more customers insisting on

    products not made in sweatshops or by children.

    82. If South Africa establishes a reputation as an ethical supplier, the industry would

    have to guard such a reputation to ensure that companies which do not comply with

    bargaining council agreements and labour legislation do not undermine it.

    83. Africa is the largest destination of South African footwear exports. In 2006 622 000

    pairs of footwear were sold into the rest of Africa, representing 48% of total exports.

    Other major countries of destination were Australia, Singapore, UK and the USA,

    together accounting for 34% of exports from South Africa. Exports to the UK and

    the USA enjoy the preferences in terms of the South Africa-EU TDCA and African

    Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Total footwear exports of 1,3m pairs for 2006

    represent a decline of 15% compared to 2005.

    84. The 5 leading countries of destination of South African exports are reflected below:

    L

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    EADING COUNTRIES OF DESTINATION

    FOR SA FOOTWEAR EXPORTS - 2006

    0

    100000

    200000

    300000

    400000

    500000

    600000

    700000

    Africa UK USA Singapore Australia

    Page 29 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    30/63

    85. The footwear industry has embarked on several initiatives to address its problems

    including the introduction of flexibility in terms of the operating status of

    manufacturers to ensure stability within the sector. An example includes efforts to

    restructure the footwear sector collective agreement that came into effect during

    2005. Another is the skills audits conducted from time to time that identify skillsneeds. These audits have identified the need for, amongst others, supervisor and

    design skills lost due to the decline in the industry.

    86. The local industrys design capabilities should be strengthened. This can be done

    by greater use of state of the art technology such as CAD-CAM technology and by

    attracting and training new designers. Design innovation can assist local

    manufacturers to shift to higher value-added footwear and leather goods

    products and to develop unique niche products in which South Africa can be

    globally competitive.

    87. The skills of the South African footwear worker compares favourably with the best in

    the developed world notwithstanding, the lack of advanced formal education

    brought about as a result of apartheid education policies. At the date of first

    publication in 2007, however, shortages were experienced in certain areas. The

    CTFL Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA), although having made some

    progress with regard to learnership training has not been able, mainly as a result of

    lack of funds, to promote footwear skills training. A very high priority in the footwear

    sector is the establishment of an institution that would strive to enhance the

    productive capacity through training, skills and technology transfer, research, quality

    control and innovative solutions that will together enhance the international

    competitiveness of the sector.

    88. A Shared Resource Centre, as envisaged in KAP 1, is indispensable in taking the

    industry forward towards world-class manufacture and optimal global

    competitiveness. An important advantage of such a centre would be the opportunity

    for manufacturers, both large and small, to work together in sharing resources and

    exchanging know-how. Generally, there has been a lack of collaboration at firm

    level in the South African industry.

    89. The industrys efforts to increase its quality, including that of its exported footwear,

    are curtailed by the lack of a national quality standard. The introduction of such astandard can address the lack of consistent quality experienced in some parts of

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 30 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    31/63

    the industry. An institution tasked to assist local manufacturers in this area could go

    some way to ensure South Africa establishes a global reputation as a high quality

    producer.

    90. A general increase in quality and a move to more innovative products and designrequire a skilled workforce. Training seems to remain a low priority in most firms,

    more particularly Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) who lack the

    capacity to provide continuous training to its workers. In some parts of the industry,

    skills deficiencies include work planning and process, people management and

    training skills among lower and middle level management.

    91. This situation is further exacerbated by the lack of a Sector Development Strategy,

    particularly a training programme, to guide manufacturers and training bodies such

    as the CTFL SETA.

    92. Where training exists, this is often not integrated into other elements of human

    resource policy to ensure career development and grading based on skills acquired.

    EMPLOYMENT

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    93. The footwear sector is the third most labour intensive sector in South Africa and it

    needs attention to ensure that the industry has a sustainable long-term future

    thereby contributing to employment growth.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 31 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    32/63

    94. Wages in the footwear sector are probably in the middle range for factory workers in

    South Africa. At the date of first publication in 2007, the highest prescribed rate in

    terms of the footwear wage agreement in the leather industry bargaining council

    was R1169.74 per week, whilst general workers earn R696.24 per week. Theformal footwear and leather goods sectors have a high level of compliance with

    labour legislation. Unfortunately there exists a fairly substantial part of the industry

    that ignore the provisions of the bargaining council and possibly even government

    legislation including taxes.

    95. There is serious doubt whether the local retail sector is too concerned about

    compliance issues. They certainly do not insist on local manufacturers obeying

    South Africas labour and tax laws, including customs provisions. As a result, in

    marketing footwear, retailers do not promote these as fair trade products. In fact, a

    fair amount of resistance from many parts of retail was initially experienced with the

    introduction of country of origin labelling requirements.

    96. Since the start of the nineteen- eighties SAFLIA has financed the biennial Date

    Bank Survey and Realst Analysis conducted by the National Productivity Institute

    with a view to improved competitiveness through improved performance. The study

    provides a system that can measure ongoing productivity changes and the effects

    of the interventions over time on bottom line performance. The last study was done

    in 2004 and the NPI reported as follows: The footwear industry has consistently

    improved since 2000 in order to become competitive with imports from countries

    with lower cost structures and more favourable exchange rates than the South

    African footwear industry. Cheaper imports also prohibited the local industry from

    raising selling prices at the same rate as input prices it is subject to.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 32 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    33/63

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Source: SAFLIAs 2006 report

    PRODUCTIVITY

    ANNUAL PER CAPITA PRODUCTIONYear Pairs per Capita

    2006 2 7172005 2 2062004 2 4602003 2 3852002 2 4892001 2 2602000 2 1331999 2 0521998 1 9951997 2 1461996 1 9941995 1 948

    97. In 2004 the NPI also undertook a Technology Audit on the footwear industry to

    establish the state of technology in the industry and to determine how the

    technology used in the industry compared to state of the art technology. The results

    reflected an average rating of 3.52 for the industry as compared to 5.00

    representing state of the art technology. Four departments were included viz.

    clicking, pre-closing, closing, and finishing. Clicking fared best at 3.83 whilstFinishing recorded 3.27. The Report stated: It is patently clear that for the South

    African footwear industry to become more competitive it will have to invest in these

    types of systems (High Technology Electronic Systems) or at least have access to

    them through it being made available through a Service Centre that could be part of

    footwear and leather goods Shared Resource Centre.

    98. Although there are manufacturers that have kept abreast of technological advances

    by regular investment in state of the art equipment, many factories, mainly SMMEs,have allowed their machinery to become obsolete thereby jeopardising their

    competitiveness.

    99. The main reason for this underinvestment is the cost of new technology and

    machinery. Often, in an industry, which has experienced the degree of adjustment

    seen over the last few years in South Africa, margins remain very low, which makes

    reinvestment difficult.

    Page 33 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    34/63

    100. The footwear sector has the potential to contribute to empowerment in the

    manufacturing sector, as barriers to entry are lower than in many other

    manufacturing sectors. It has already experienced a significant amount of Black

    Economic Empowerment (BEE). However, this progress has not incorporated the

    African population significantly. In addition, many suppliers to the industry remainwhite-owned, resulting in a lack of BEE in procurement. The industry is also still

    experiencing a lack of higher-level technical and managerial skills among the

    previously disadvantaged.

    101. The perception of the footwear sector as declining has inhibited participation by

    previously disadvantaged and, like many other areas of manufacturing, reduced its

    attractiveness to potential BEE investors.

    102. There is a general acceptance in the industry that the transformation of the industry

    through B-BBEE, provides numerous advantages to the economy and the industry

    itself.

    103. Indeed, with the introduction of legislation dealing with the concept of B-BBEE,

    SAFLIA formally embraced the principle of the application of B-BBEE in the

    footwear and leather goods industry.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 34 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    35/63

    Chapter 3: Sector Strategic Plan

    Strategic Vision

    104. Footwear and Leather Goods sector will be one of the most stable, predictable and

    profitable sectors in the South African economy. With strong brands, unique

    response capabilities and constant innovation it will provide service superior to that

    of competitors, provide sustainable, quality employment, training and skills

    development and become the cornerstone supplier to its customer.

    Key Strategic Challenges

    105. Key strategic challenges that retard the sector from achieving the strategic vision

    and not resolve themselves optimally, and that there is clear role for business,

    government and labour:

    Ageing plant and equipment

    Low export orientation

    Surge of footwear imports

    Lack of innovative designs Declining investment in research and development

    General lack of continuous training and skills development

    Inability of the Industry to attract investment

    Impact of HIV/AIDS and down-sizing of industry has led to loss of skilled

    labour

    Adapting to the short-run character of industry due to limited market size

    Inability of the sectors to empower all segments of the black population

    Unfair competition due to importation of undervalue goods & false declaration

    Loss of quality jobs through casualisation and informalisation.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 35 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    36/63

    Longer-term Direction

    106. High level indications of the type of activity that will fundamentally transform the

    structure of the sectors by addressing the strategic challenges identified above are:

    Access to finance and venture capital must be facilitated

    Leadership must be provided; cluster culture and teamwork must be promoted

    Skins and hides must be beneficiated

    Reduction of input cost of leather, soles & raw materials

    Focused design and branding initiatives must be developed. This will include

    market development

    Research and Development (R&D) and technology transfer must be encouraged

    to enhance productivity

    Focused and coherent approach to skills development and upgrading by aligning

    tertiary institutions with industry needs must be supported

    Equity must be spread across the South African black population

    The current forum of engagement must be strengthened

    Chapter 4: Sector Implementation PlanPRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 36 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    37/63

    107. It is clear that the interventions required to secure the vision mentioned in chapter 3

    of this document encompass a broad set of factors, as well as a focus on the

    domestic and international markets. Based on the terminology of the Customised

    Sector Programme, the required interventions are discussed in detail within each

    KAP.

    108. The KAPs are broadly divided into three key strategic themes, namely:

    Competitiveness;

    Domestic market development; and

    Empowerment.

    A. Strategic Theme: Competitiveness

    Key Strategic Challenge: Lack of international competitiveness

    109. The South African footwear and leather goods sectors require a significant focus on

    innovation in order to stay competitive. The current status quo within the sector is

    low levels of expenditure on Research and Development (R&D), technology and

    training compared to competitor countries, which results in poor capacity to

    innovate. Innovation is essential to the future success of the footwear and leathergoods sectors.

    110. The South African Wet Blue (hides and skins) is historically not competitive in terms

    of the price and quality produced by competitors such as Australia, Brazil and Italy.

    Prices of local hides are higher than those of competing countries. In addition, the

    chemicals used by local tanneries and retainers are more expensive due to high

    freight costs that are added to imports. The environment is less friendly for informal

    hides suppliers and this is aggravated by a poor veterinary structures as comparedto Europe and USA.

    111. Formal and rural farmers are not trained in better livestock husbandry, which

    impacts on the quality of hides and skins. Cattle are also not well branded (tagging

    IDs, freezing branding) to reduce waste from current 40% unusable material. There

    is a need for R&D on better methods to process hides and skins in order to increase

    the usage of available hides and skins.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 37 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    38/63

    112. Footwear and Leather Goods producers in South Africa require high quality but

    cheaper leather, in order to improve their comparative advantage in the global

    economy. This has to be coupled with addressing other weaknesses within the

    sectors.

    113. A key weakness in the South African footwear and leather goods sectors is the

    shortage of well-trained and competent new graduates entering the market.

    Academic institutions have a low focus on courses related to footwear sector and

    poor focus on new products and processes. The footwear industry has a negative

    image amongst pupils and students, and the industry is therefore not regarded as

    an attractive career. Research study programmes at academic institutions are not

    aligned with the commercial realities of industry.

    114. An additional area to be addressed is retail and customer requirement with respect

    to design, quality and capacity. The purchase of new technology is a challenge for

    the industry given the cost of acquiring new technology. This limits the capability of

    the industry to effectively implement and maintain state of the art technology.

    115. The intervention described in KAP 1 will contribute to improving the competitiveness

    of the sectors but would need the implementation of other KAPs as well to be totally

    effective.

    116. It is recognised that several other issues, such as quality improvement and

    innovation, are critical for increasing competitiveness. The Shared Resource

    Centre will deals with these issue.

    117. The globalisation and the liberalisation of trade accelerated the flow of goods and

    ideas amongst nations. This required restructuring of the production and

    consumption of manufactured goods. The South African footwear and leather goods

    industry needs to find ways to adapt to the new trends that resulted from

    globalisation. This will need the involvement of manufacturers, labour and

    government to find acceptable ways to put the local industry on par with global

    competitors.

    Key Action Programme No. 1: Shared Resource Centre

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 38 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    39/63

    118. The Shared Resource Centre will be a productively driven, globally competitive, and

    outcomes driven service provider that delivers business assistance, technical

    support, quality control, research and development, world-class technical and

    design skills and technology transfer on a cost effective basis. The Centre would

    also assist new entrants to the sector with innovative solutions through anincubation process that would provide for the specific needs of the industry. It is an

    ideal opportunity for South Africa to establish itself as a significant force

    through this Centre and therefore it is necessary for stakeholders to agree on

    scope of this Centre.

    119. It is important that a Shared Resource Centre should contribute towards enhancing

    these factors. This indicates firstly that the entire industry should support and use

    the services of the Centre and secondly that the Centre would fulfil the specific

    needs of the industry. The views of the potential users of the Centre are thus central

    in the design of the Centre in terms scope, services, and operations.

    120. Labour obviously plays an important role throughout the entire process of improving

    competitiveness. Labour is one important resource that should be enabled to

    produce world-class manufacturing for optimal global competitiveness. World-class

    manufacturing also requires world-class technology, equipment, and world-class

    human resources with matching skills through the whole process (from market

    research and design through procurement, production, marketing and distribution)

    in a quest to consistently satisfy customer and client expectations. Appropriate

    management and control skills are required throughout the process to ensure cost

    effective and globally competitive products and services according to the

    requirements of the market.

    121. A Shared Resource Centre would certainly not succeed without the wholehearted

    support of all the role players in the industry i.e. manufacturers, retailers, labour and

    government.

    122. Design and product innovation are critical for shifting to higher value-added

    footwear and leather goods products and for developing unique niche products in

    which South Africa can be globally competitive

    123. The proposed Shared Resource Centre can play an important role in ensuringinnovation becomes an integral part of local manufacturing. It can attract young

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 39 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    40/63

    people by instituting a youth development programme in which talented designers

    and other skilled young people are mentored. It can also ensure better coordination

    between designers and manufacturers to ensure that improvements in design

    capacity translate into growth in volume output and employment.

    124. A major programme of research into new product development and process

    technology should be launched under the auspices of the Shared Resource Centre

    and other relevant institutions such as the CSIR. Companies should be encouraged

    to set aside budgets for research and development in product innovation. This could

    be a conditionality set by the government for support given to companies in other

    areas of this CSP.

    125. Innovative design and products, coupled with a sector-wide increase in quality, will

    allow the South African footwear and leather goods industry to distinguish itself from

    other countries footwear and leather goods industries.

    126. The Shared Resource Centre should therefore also assist firms to improve their

    quality.

    127. Footwear and leather goods firms can improve their competitiveness by developing

    and enhancing strengths in key areas of soft competitiveness, namely in

    innovation, quality, creativity and lead-time reductions through engaging in best

    practices and continuous improvement. The Shared Resource Centre has a major

    role to play in this regard.

    The Goal

    128. To increase competitiveness by establishing a Shared Resource Centre that

    will assist the sector, including clusters.

    Obstacles to Implementation

    129. Inadequate support for the Shared Resource Centre from all stakeholders

    130. Inadequate resources and infrastructure

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 40 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    41/63

    131. Lack of capacity of experienced staff to champion and drive the Shared Resource

    Centre;

    132. Lack of effective product, geographical or supply chain clusters in the sectors.

    133. Lack of clear and objective understanding of cluster methodology and the

    commitment required

    134. Lack of financial resources to sustain clusters.

    Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle

    135. Providing the sector, including clusters, with both business support and technicalassistance, and incubating world-class manufacturing and design skills

    136. Attracting financial support from provincial and local government, international

    donors and the private sector for a Centre that delivers on its mandate and to build

    clusters in areas where sufficient agglomeration warrants

    137. Establishing technical co-operation agreements with the existing international

    best pract ise centres especially directed towards capacity building.

    138. Setting up common objectives to grow the sector.

    139. Identifying new and existing clusters.

    140. Provide a cluster secretariat inclusive of a facil itator to assist with the

    development and implementation of cluster initiatives.

    Levers Required

    141. Finances

    142. Business, labour and government partnership and buy-in.

    143. Advocacy

    Resources Required Starting from a Zero Base PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 41 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    42/63

    144. Human resources.

    145. Financial resources (R1 000 000 per annum per cluster and to fund the Shared

    Resource Centre).

    146. Adequate skills to manage and offer the courses and services of the centre

    effectively;

    147. State of the art equipment, tools and techniques;

    148. Adequate infrastructure.

    Risks and Mitigating Actions

    149. Perception of declining trend of the footwear and leather goods industry could

    result in the Shared Resource Centre not attracting experienced staff, thus

    undermining the intent of this key action programme. However, it is widely believed

    that a properly managed Sector Resource Centre will assist the sector to continue

    its turn around and become more competitive, which would make employment in

    the Sector Resource Centre more attractive;

    150. Poor management of the Centre could result in substantial monetary resources

    being wasted. Close industry monitoring and support for the Centre are

    required.

    151. Lack of interest in developing quality products and moving up the value chain by

    firms. Successful marketing the Shared Resource Centres quality improvement

    programme and creating awareness of the advantages of improved quality can

    mitigate this.

    152. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreements

    receiving support from the Shared Resource Centre. Only companies who comply

    with the relevant labour laws and bargaining council agreements should receive

    support and funding.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 42 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    43/63

    153. The risk in developing and implementing clusters is a lack of cluster culture in South

    Africa. Constant training in cluster development will mitigate this.

    154. Clusters may not be adequately funded. This will require long term partnerships to

    be developed between business and provincial and national government in order foradequate resources to be deployed.

    155. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreements

    participating in cluster, Only companies who comply with the relevant labour laws

    and bargaining council agreements should be allowed to participate in clusters

    Implementing Group and Champion

    156. Business (champion), labour, the dti , provincial governments, CTFL SETA,

    similar existing centre, CSIR, retailers and designers.

    Expected Outcomes (potential net economic benefit)

    157. Improved education and technical skills in the sector supporting the potential for

    higher value added activities within the value chain;

    158. Product development and other technical services providing increased scope for

    high value added production through the value chain;

    159. Development of innovative products and designs and using this as a competitive

    advantage.

    160. A sector-wide increase in quality.

    161. An increased number of South African manufacturers with global standard

    accreditations.

    162. Improved quality management system capabilities of manufacturers.

    163. Job creation

    164. Move to world-class competitive industry.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 43 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    44/63

    165. Positive link between cluster development and:

    Competitiveness;

    Employment creation; Skills development;

    Export development;

    Import replacement;

    Sector sustainability;

    Investment attraction; and

    SMME development.

    Key Performance Indicators

    166. Number of advanced technical and technological training courses offered by the

    Centre, in conjunction with the appropriate further and higher level educational

    institutions;

    167. Number and quality of students qualifying through the Centre and entering the

    industry;

    168. Number of ideas commercialised

    169. Number of firms including the SMMEs using the Centre and its services, including

    linkages with designers, assistance with development of new products

    170. Measurable improvements in quality-levels at participating firms, including to such a

    level that companies can achieve global standards accreditations

    171. Increased production volumes

    172. Improved footwear and leather goods trade balance

    173. Number of functioning clusters

    174. Number of jobs created

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 44 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    45/63

    175. Budget line-item created

    Key Strategy Challenges: Ageing plant and equipment

    176. According to Cabinet Lekgotla of 2005: Access to capital has been a big

    constraint in small business development. While several funds and structures

    were in place, these needed to be made more accessible. It is a challenge of

    implementation.

    177. The continued low level of capital investment in the footwear and leather goods

    sectors is a major impediment to their future success. The sectors recognise

    that a failure to invest has significantly undermined competitiveness. Failure to

    secure new capital investment and upgrading the technological base is likely toresult in continued crisis management rather than sustained and sustainable

    improvement in competitiveness. Encouraging technology upgrading in the

    footwear and leather goods sectors is therefore of great importance to the

    success of this Strategy.

    178. The purchase of new technology is a challenge for the sectors given the cost of

    acquiring new technology. This limits the capability of the sectors to effectively

    implement and maintain state of the art technology.

    Key Action Programme No. 2: Upgrading the Technological Base

    179. This KAP seeks to update outdated machinery and technology by encouraging

    firms to invest and employ state of the art technology.

    The Goal

    180. To improve efficiency and quality through increased investment in technology

    and equipment.

    Obstacles to implementation

    181. Lack of financial resources

    182. High cost of new technology

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 45 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    46/63

    183. Obtaining the knowledge and skills to effectively implement and maintain state of

    the art technology

    Interventions to remove obstacles

    184. Setting up a funding system to assist the sector to upgrade technology in line with

    the goals of this CSP

    185. Promoting availability of funding system to ensure participation by firms, including

    by awareness campaigns

    186. Firms to develop viable business plans to gain access to preferential loans or

    investment support, including quid pro quos in relation to governments economicaspirations

    Lever required

    187. Finance

    188. Technology and innovation

    189. Training

    Resources required (starting from a zero base)

    190. Finance

    191. Human resources will be required to facilitate the training that is needed.

    Risks and mitigating actions

    192. Limited use of the scheme by the sectors due to financial constraints and

    bureaucracy. To mitigate this risk government should provide public funding to firms

    based on viable business plans.

    193. Public funding constraints. Government will need to make a commitment to the

    technology upgrading.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 46 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    47/63

    194. Non-participation in other KAPs by footwear and leather goods companies. This can

    be mitigated by linking funding received for new technology and machinery with

    participation in other applicable KAPs, especially the KAP on skills training.

    195. Companies not adhering with labour laws and bargaining council agreementsreceiving money from government for upgrading machinery. Government should

    ensure only those companies who comply with the relevant laws and agreements

    receive funding.

    Champion and implementing group

    196. the dti (Champion)

    197. Industry

    198. National Treasury,

    199. Department of Science and Technology,

    200. CSIR

    Expected Outcomes (potential net economic benefit)

    201. Increase in the level of new technology and equipment within firms

    202. Improvement of productivity

    203. Improved skills base

    Key Performance Indicators

    204. Improved technology and equipment profile of the sector, leading to increased

    productivity, sales volumes, job security and sustainable job creation, better

    products and improved work processes.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 47 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    48/63

    B. Strategic Theme: Domestic Market Development

    Key Strategic Challenge: Illegal imports

    205. The competitiveness measures set out in the Strategic Theme above cannot besuccessfully implemented without providing the industry with some respite from

    footwear and leather goods imports, especially illegal and under-invoiced imports,

    entering the local market.

    206. This will assist the local industry in achieving some success in the domestic market,

    which is essential for the survival of the industry and for kick-starting export growth.

    Relief from illegal imports would also help lessen the destruction of jobs and

    productive capacity.

    Key Action Programme No. 3: Combat High Levels of Illegal Imports

    207. Illegal imports include activities such as under-invoicing, under-valuation, false

    declaration of goods, rerouting via third countries and corrupt payments to customs

    officials that are aimed at evading tariffs or other customs rules, and any other

    import practices that are not consistent with the law. These imports fall in two

    categories: those that are understated in the official import figures and others thatare simply not reflected.

    208. Illegally imported goods, inclusive of under-invoiced goods, cost the local economy

    jobs. Successfully combating illegal imports can have a significant employment

    impact.

    209. The proposal of a system of technical guidelines to identify suspect pricing claims,

    which would be used by customs agents to identify probable fraudulentdeclarations, is a vital element in combating under-invoicing and fraudulent claims.

    This needs to be supplemented with regular internal audits of invoices to identify

    suspicious transactions, based in part on price claims.

    210. Local industry has for some time cooperated with authorities, including SARS to

    address the issue of illegal imports. However, much more work is needed to rid our

    economy of this problem. Industry recognises that government alone cannot fix this

    and will assist it to battle illegal imports.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 48 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    49/63

    211. The space created by curbing the amount of illegally imported footwear and leather

    flowing into South Africa can be used to market locally made goods. This would fit

    well with the increased quality, design and innovation envisaged for local products

    in this Sector Development Strategy.

    212. Government, labour and business should identify opportunities to market locally

    manufactured goods through marketing campaigns using the label of origin

    legislation and through partnerships with the likes of Proudly South African.

    213. Government, labour and business should also investigate ways to deal with

    counterfeiting and passing off of local brands.

    The Goal:

    214. To eliminate unfair competition, firm closures and job losses brought about by

    under-invoiced and other illegal imports through better law enforcement.

    Obstacles to Implementation:

    215. Lack of supportive regulations providing SARS with a framework to respond to

    illegal imports.

    216. Lack of resources and capacity amongst South African and SACU customs officials

    to effectively identify and respond to illegal imports.

    Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:

    217. Government to

    Increase budget to SARS to enable it to employ more customs officials to

    increase inspections of containers and improve other areas of customs

    controls.

    218. SARS to

    Implement the WTO compliant framework that enables it to effectivelyrespond to both under-invoiced and other illegal imports

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 49 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    50/63

    Institute forensic investigations of major importers and, in the event that

    they are only agents, of their customers

    Criminalise illegal importing, including asset forfeiture

    Destroy seized goods

    Increase the rate of container inspections

    Cooperate with industry, for example taking up offers of training from

    industry

    Reduce the number of points of entry

    219. Business to

    Provide resources for SACU customs officials to allow them to effectively

    identify illegal imports. This could potentially take a number of forms,

    including the provision of pricing models based on South African materials

    costs, import values into other major economies and product-specific training

    Levers Required:

    220. Finances

    221. Training

    222. Appropriate regulations.

    Resources Required:

    223. Limited monetary resources would be required to develop the pricing model and a

    reference database as the information required should be readily accessible fromindustry and customs departments of other countries.

    224. Monetary resources will be required for the relatively extensive training required of

    Customs officials. Human resources for training SARS officials in product

    knowledge would be provided by business.

    Risks and Mitigating Actions:

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 50 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    51/63

    225. Too many ports of entry for effective control of illegal footwear and leather goods

    imports. This can be mitigated by rationalising the number of ports of entry for

    footwear and leather goods imports.

    226. Current legal framework is inadequate to deter illegal activities. Convictingtransgressors in courts of law and introducing asset forfeiture in such cases can

    mitigate this.

    227. SARS unable to effectively monitor imports. To address this risk, resources should

    be allocated to a larger sector-specific unit at SARS.

    Implementing Group and Champion:

    228. South African Revenue Service (champion), SAPS, the dti , labour, manufacturers,

    importers, retailers, SDC and the Department of Justice.

    Expected Outcomes:

    229. Reduced levels of illegal and under-invoiced imports into SACU.

    230. Increased revenue collection by SACUs customs agencies.

    231. Improved trading conditions for domestic and regional manufacturers, resulting in

    increased employment and investment.

    Key Performance Indicators :

    232. Number of identified under-invoiced and illegal shipments entering South Africa.

    233. Number of containers detained due to under-invoicing and other illegal activities.

    234. Number of successful criminal prosecutions for illegal importing.

    235. Growth in employment, production and market share.

    236. Increased customs revenue

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 51 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    52/63

    C. Strategic theme: Empowerment

    237. The South African footwear and leather goods sectors need a focused BEE strategy

    to achieve the B-BBEE of black industries. The BEE strategy will facilitate growth,

    development and stability in the economy.

    Key Strategic Challenge: Transforming the industrys profile

    238. The leather goods industry does not have black people who have ownership and

    control of existing enterprises while the footwear sector does not reflect a complete

    B-BBEE.

    Key Action Programme No. 4: Promoting B-BBEE

    239. The transformation of the sectors through B-BBEE, provides certain advantages to

    the economy. One of them is the long-term commercial benefit to the participants of

    that process. It also provides for non-commercial or intangible benefits where the

    participants are working towards a common vision and equal access to

    opportunities in the sector. At a public policy level, the promotion of active

    participation by black persons in the industry help to realise an important goal of

    government and provides further rationale for public sector support for the industry.

    240. The footwear sector has the potential to contribute to empowerment in the

    manufacturing sector, as barriers to entry are lower than in many other

    manufacturing sectors.

    The Goal:

    241. To adopt, implement and promote the governments Codes of Good Practice

    for B-BBEE.

    Obstacles to implementation:

    242. Perception of the footwear sector as a sunset industry inhibits participation and

    reduces attractiveness to potential BEE investors.

    243. BEE is concentrating in a certain segment of the black population.

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS244. Availability of capital for BEE transactions.

    Page 52 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    53/63

    245. Lack of higher-level technical and managerial skills among black people.

    Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:

    246. The governments Codes of Good Pract ice for B-BBEE-set compliance targets.

    247. To monitor and ensure implementation of the governments Codes of Good

    Practice, specifically at firm level.

    248. Proactive marketing of opportunities amongst potential BEE investors and

    potential future employees.

    Levers Required:

    249. Learner ships to attract future employees

    250. Employment Equity Act, B-BBEE Act.

    Resources Required:

    251. Monetary and human resources to facilitate the activities of the governments

    Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE.

    Risks and Mitigating Actions:

    252. Failure to reach full agreement, or compromising on the central objectives of the

    governments Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE. This can be mitigated by

    strong governmental leadership and monitoring of codes of good practice.

    253. BEE only seen as dealing with ownership structures and not being broad-based. B-

    BBEE.

    Implementing Group and Champion:

    254. Business associations and labour (champions), the dti , Department of Labour.

    Expected Outcomes: PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 53 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    54/63

    255. Adequately empowered and transformed footwear and leather goods sectors.

    Key Performance Indicators:

    256. Implementation of governments Codes of Good Practice for B-BBEE.

    257. Reaching of targets in line with the B-BBEE code.

    258. Use of the industry as an example of successful B-BBEE.

    259. Number of successful black-owned companies.

    KAP No. 5: Promote Skills Development, Training and Sustainable Employment

    260. The achievement of this Sector Development Strategys strategic vision depends

    largely on highly skilled workforce at operator, supervisor, management and all

    other levels.

    261. As the local footwear and leather goods industry lacks world-class skills at a

    number of levels, it needs a coordinated skills development programme that coversthe full spectrum of skills requirements in support of future growth areas.

    262. The main vehicle for the implementation of such a programme will be the SETA.

    The CTFL SETA already implements a number of programmes, but is under-

    resourced and space exists for an improvement in the allocation of resources and

    its current programmes. The SETA must be appropriately resourced and its work

    programme aligned with this Sector Development Strategy.

    263. This programme should;

    Increase the number of employees on accredited training and development

    programmes and learnership programmes dramatically to ensure that at

    least 15% of the workforce is trained and/or retrained every year, resulting

    in a full skills upgrade in the sectors within five years

    Address skills bottlenecks, especially in the training of middle management

    in work planning, process and people management skills

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 54 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    55/63

    Integrate training with other elements of human resource policy. A skills-based

    grading system for workers with appropriate rewards to encourage skills

    formation, career-pathing and incentives to participate in training programmes

    should be developed

    264. Without skilled workers and management, this Sector Development Strategy and

    many of its projects will not show the desired results.

    265. The provisions of employment law and the Bill of Rights in the South African

    Constitution govern the South African labour market. Modern industrial relations

    machinery exists in the form of advanced conciliation and arbitration systems,

    dedicated training institutions and collective bargaining forums in the form of

    statutory bargaining councils.

    266. The footwear and leather goods industry is characterised by relatively cooperative

    industrial relations between organised labour and business. A national bargaining

    council exists in the sectors. Nevertheless, some companies do not adhere to

    minimum standards of employment.

    267. A policy that seeks to base competitiveness on low wages would not be consistent

    with South Africas human rights culture or with the goals of this Sector

    Development Strategy. On the contrary, sustainable human resource policies will

    allow the industry to compete in the market for fair trade products.

    268. With an important segment of consumer consciousness favouring ethical sourcing

    emerging in major trading partners of South Africa, the promotion of fair trade

    practices would constitute a major competitive advantage over certain other

    developing country exporters. It would allow the industry to market itself as an

    ethical supplier in foreign markets.

    269. Sustainable and appropriately remunerated employment also improves the

    disposable incomes of families, which in turn feeds into consumption, motivates

    employees and results in increased productivity

    The Goal:

    PRIORITY SECTOR: FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER GOODS

    Page 55 of 63

  • 8/14/2019 CSPLeatherandFootwear

    56/63

    270. To develop a labour force and management corps with world-class skills, able to

    work productively in full compliance with labour legislation and under fair labour

    standards, and to produce innovative products of world-class standards, through

    continuous training.

    Obstacles to Implementation:

    271. Inadequate financial and human resources for the CTFL SETA.

    272. Inadequate systems at the CTFL SETA.

    273. Insufficient number of learners on traineeships.

    274. Lack of management skills.

    275. Coordination between current training and skills requirements.

    276. Attempts to bypass and undermine the South African Constitution, laws and

    bargaining council agreements in certain workplaces and areas of South Africa.

    Interventions to Remove Each Obstacle:

    277. Government to provide adequate financial resources for the CTFL SETA for

    example through the National Skills Fund.

    278. Industry developing a strategic plan for the SETA and enhance its capacity to

    manage the skills development programme through additional staff and improved

    management systems.

    279. The industry placing 15% of the workforce through structured learnerships and

    accredited training and development programmes on an annual basis.

    280.