CSE Senior Design IICSE Senior Design II

Final Project PresentationFinal Project Presentation

1 Final Project PresentationFinal Project PresentationFriday, May 3rd

Begins sharply at 8:00 AM in ERB 1038:00 AM in ERB 103Each team has 35 minutes 35 minutes for:

Presentation (30 min) Q & A (5 min)

Store presentations Store presentations on your computer or a USB drive. Email a copy Email a copy to odell@uta.edu before 8:00 AM on presentation day.

DemosDemos will be set up on tables in ERB 103 before 7:30 AM. Teams will do their demos after the last presentation

Poster boardPoster board is set up with demo

1 Final Project PresentationFinal Project PresentationOrder/timing of presentations is:

8:00 – 8:35 AM Team Power Visio 8:40 – 9:15 AM Team MASS 9:20 - 9:55 AM Team Behind the

Curtain 10:00 - 10:35 AM Team Easy Office

Solutions 10:40 – 11:15 AM Team AVIAR 11:20 AM - 12:30 PM Demos & lunchNoteNote: plan to begin your demo set-up early, and to be finished and

in your seats in ERB 103 no later than 7:55 AM. Demos should be planned (and rehearsed) to last no longer than 10 minutes per team.

1 Final Project Presentation Final Project Presentation ContentContent

Roles and Responsibilities Roles and Responsibilities of team members (1)(1)

Project OverviewOverview & Product ConceptConcept (2)(2)Requirements Requirements OverviewOverview – Per baseline SRD (2)(2)

Requirements Completion Summary/Analysis (green, yellow, red button next to requirements)

DesignDesign Overview (4)(4) Summarize ADS and DDS, design trade-offs

Test Plan Test Plan Overview & Results report (2)(2)Project Effort AssessmentEffort Assessment: (1)(1)

Lines of code, hardware, earned value, time spent …

TEAM Lessons Learned TEAM Lessons Learned (1)(1)Numbers in parentheses represent approximate number of slides/weight for each topic.

1 Final Project PresentationFinal Project PresentationHints for Success:Dress professionallyDress professionally and present at your best

SPEAK UP - Project your voice to the back the room Hands out of pockets Eye contact with entire audience

RehearseRehearse as a team – coach each otherStay on topic – be crisp, concise, don’t ramblebe crisp, concise, don’t rambleUse graphics, pictures graphics, pictures wherever possible to

liven up the presentationPractice your demo Practice your demo so you can show what

you’ve done in no more than 10 minutes.

1 Final Project PresentationFinal Project PresentationOther Info:Friends, familyFriends, family, significant others are

invited/encouraged to attendPlease attend a short celebration short celebration after

demos (approx. 12:30 PM).Each demo setup must include a 3-part

posterboardposterboard project summaryPicture of team, title of project, key roles & responsibilitiesProduct concept/descriptionArchitectural design diagramKey requirements, with completion indicatorLessons LearnedPhotos, etc. as required

1 Final Presentation ScoringFinal Presentation ScoringOverall, this day represents 38% - 39% 38% - 39% of

your grade for Senior Design 2! Final Presentation = Final Exam = 30% Final Product = 100 of approx. 350 possible

points for team deliverables (30%) = 8.57%Final Presentation Score by peer, GTA and

instructor evaluation rubric (on website)Final Product Scoring by instructor per

following scale.

1 Final Product Scoring GuidelineFinal Product Scoring Guideline 100: fully operational prototype, fully functional per plan,

professionally packaged (extremely rare) 95-99: operational prototype, with minor functional deficiencies,

cleanly and neatly packaged (rare) 90-94: operational prototype, some major functional deficiencies,

packaged well as a prototype (somewhat common) 85-89: operational prototype, numerous functional deficiencies, not

well packaged (common) 80-84: functioning prototype, with minimal features operational, not

well packaged or not packaged at all (frequent) 70-79: non-functioning prototype, unable to demonstrate key/critical

features, prototype is not worthy of display (occasional) <70: non operational bread-boarded design only, numerous

functional deficiencies, unable to demonstrate critical features (rare)