Cs Varnavrat land Slide

7
Geological Survey of India Contributed by Northern Region 1 Treatment and Stabilisation of Varunavat Parvat Landslide, Uttarkashi District, Uttarakhand Uttarkashi town (Long.78º 26’E, Lat.30º44’N) is located at the toe of the hill slopes of the Varunavat Parvat (Photo1), on the right bank of Bhagirathi river, at an elevation of ±1150m.s.l. It is located at a distance of 155km from Rishikesh on Rishikesh – Gangotri National Highway (NH108). River Bhagirathi is passing through the centre of the town almost half of which is located at the base of Varunavat Parvat. A massive landslide on Varunavat Parvat started on 24 Sept. 2003 subsequent to the incessant rains in the area. The landslide activity progressed eastward from Ram Lila ground to Masjid Mohalla. The slide activity buried a number of civil structures like houses, govt. offices, hotels, etc. which were located by the side of NH108 at the toe of the hill. Almost 3000 people were affected by the Varunavat slides and property worth Rs 50 crores was damaged. However, it is worth mentioning that no loss of human life occurred during this disastrous slide activity because of timely proactive action taken by the district administration on the basis of early warning given by GSI. The National Highway (NH108) was completely blocked by debris flow. Due to blockade of this highway a 145m long alternate route was opened between Sanskrit MahavidyalayaMahisasurMardini temple areas. During sliding activity and blockade in Tambakhani area the traffic was diverted via JoshiyaraTiloth –CollectorateDurga temple route. GSI geologists while working in this area about one month before the landslide noticed some indications of slope movement on Varunavat Parvat on 2124 August 2003 and advised the district administration for immediate evacuation of the high risk zone at the toe of the hill, i.e. Varunavat Parvat. The prompt action taken by the district authorities on this advice from 24.09.03 onwards by warning / evacuating the residents from identified high risk zone saved human lives when the disaster struck the area. A total of 293 buildings including 23 government buildings were identified. The landslide damaged 81 buildings completely. 212 buildings prone to damage have been identified in buffer zone. As soon as the enormity of the hazard was realised by Uttarakhand Government an expert committee was formed by Chief Secretary, Uttarakhand in Sept.2003 to suggest immediate remedial measures with GSI as its member. Thereafter, a Central Composite team was formed by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi vide letter No. D2705/2003NDM1 dated 21.10.2003 with Director, GSI as coordinator of the team to assess the situation and to find out possibilities of the stabilisation of Varunavat Parvat as an interim

description

land side case study

Transcript of Cs Varnavrat land Slide

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion1

    TreatmentandStabilisationofVarunavatParvatLandslide,Uttarkashi

    District,Uttarakhand

    Uttarkashi town (Long.7826E,Lat.3044N) is locatedat the toeof thehillslopesof

    the Varunavat Parvat (Photo1), on the right bank of Bhagirathi river, at an elevation of

    1150m.s.l.Itislocatedatadistanceof155kmfromRishikeshonRishikeshGangotriNational

    Highway (NH108).RiverBhagirathi ispassing through the centreof the town almosthalfof

    whichislocatedatthebaseofVarunavatParvat.

    Amassive landslide on Varunavat Parvat started on 24 Sept. 2003 subsequent to the

    incessantrainsinthearea.ThelandslideactivityprogressedeastwardfromRamLilagroundto

    MasjidMohalla.Theslideactivityburiedanumberofcivilstructures likehouses,govt.offices,

    hotels,etc.whichwerelocatedbythesideofNH108atthetoeofthehill.Almost3000people

    wereaffectedbytheVarunavatslidesandpropertyworthRs50croreswasdamaged.However,

    it isworthmentioning thatno lossofhuman lifeoccurredduring thisdisastrousslideactivity

    because of timely proactive action taken by the district administration on the basis of early

    warninggivenbyGSI.TheNationalHighway (NH108)wascompletelyblockedbydebris flow.

    Due to blockade of this highway a 145m long alternate routewas opened between Sanskrit

    MahavidyalayaMahisasurMardini temple areas. During sliding activity and blockade in

    TambakhaniareathetrafficwasdivertedviaJoshiyaraTilothCollectorateDurgatempleroute.

    GSIgeologistswhileworkinginthisareaaboutonemonthbeforethelandslidenoticed

    some indicationsof slopemovementonVarunavatParvaton2124August2003andadvised

    thedistrictadministrationforimmediateevacuationofthehighriskzoneatthetoeofthehill,

    i.e.VarunavatParvat.Thepromptaction takenby thedistrictauthoritieson thisadvice from

    24.09.03onwardsbywarning /evacuating the residents from identifiedhigh risk zone saved

    humanliveswhenthedisasterstruckthearea.Atotalof293buildingsincluding23government

    buildingswere identified.The landslidedamaged81buildingscompletely.212buildingsprone

    todamagehavebeenidentifiedinbufferzone.

    As soon as the enormity of the hazardwas realised byUttarakhandGovernment an

    expert committee was formed by Chief Secretary, Uttarakhand in Sept.2003 to suggest

    immediate remedialmeasureswithGSIas itsmember.Thereafter,aCentralComposite team

    was formed by theMinistry ofHomeAffairs,Govt. of India,NewDelhi vide letterNo.D27

    05/2003NDM1dated21.10.2003withDirector,GSIascoordinatorof the team toassess the

    situation and to find out possibilities of the stabilisation of Varunavat Parvat as an interim

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion2

    measure and also to explore the feasibility of permanent stabilisation for habitation.

    Subsequently,aTaskForcewassetupunderthechairpersonshipofJointSecretary,Ministryof

    Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India. Under the aegis of this Task Force, a Technical

    Committee was formed for which Director, Geological Survey of India, Uttarakhand Unit,

    Dehradunwasmadethechairman.

    GeologyandTectonics

    UttarkashitownislocatedintheLesserHimalayangeotectonicblockanditisbounded

    bytwomajorthrustfaultsMainCentralThrust(MCT)andSrinagarThrust(ST).TheMCTexists

    inthenortheastofUttarkashi,separatingrocksofGarhwalGroupandCentralCrystalline.The

    Srinagar Thrust lies in the southwest of Uttarkashi and along this tectonic plane rocks of

    Garhwal Group and Jaunsar Group are juxtaposed. The Garhwal Group (Proterozoic age)

    comprisesquartzite,phylliteandmetabasicrockandthesedip1545 inN1040Edirection

    i.e.intothehill.TherocksformingVarunavathillarecomposedofthinlybeddedquartziteand

    phyllitewhich arehighlyweathered,destressed,decomposed, jointed and fractured.Thehill

    slopes areof theorderof 4560 except at the topof thehillwhere the slopes are gently

    sloping.ThetopportionoftheVarunavathillisoccupiedbyloose,unconsolidated,overburden

    mass,exhibitinggentletopography.ThetopisatEl.1800mwhereasthetoepartofthehillisat

    El.1100abovemsl.

    The interfaceofoverburdenmassandunderlyingrocks isatEl.1650m.Uttarkashi lies

    inZoneVofSeismicZoningMapofIndiaandithasarecordedseismichistory.

    CausesofLandslides

    Thecontinuousheavyrainsinthearea ledtosaturationoftheoverburden/loosemass

    occupying the topof thehillsabove theEl.1650m supporting luxuriantvegetativecoverand

    restingondenselyvegetatedrockyslopesofweatheredquartzite.Thesaturationbyrainwater

    increased the increase inporepressure in theoverlyingoverburdenmassand lubricated the

    underlying fracturedweathered rockmass. This had in fact reduced shear resistance of the

    slopematerialsandthustriggeredtheslides.Oncetheslidesweretriggered,thefastmovement

    ofdebris flowcarriedalong themuprootedpine treesdown theslopeandburied thehuman

    settlements located at the toe of the hill around Ram Lila ground, Horticulture colony and

    MasjidMohalla.Theslopemovementcontinuedforaboutamonthwithdustcloudsandthen

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion3

    subsided.Pastanthropogenicactivitiesespeciallyinthetoeofthehillhavealsorenderedthehill

    slopesvulnerable.

    Immediateinitiativesundertaken/ActionPlanbyGSI

    Immediately after the slide activity an action plan was proposed and adopted for

    immediateimplementationwhichincluded:i)creationofabufferzone,closetothetoeofthe

    Varunavat.ItwasredemarcatedbyexpertsfromGSIandCBRIashighriskzone; ii)removalof

    slidematerialaccumulatedclosetoRamLilagroundalongtheNHforresumingvehiculartraffic;

    iii) startingof geologicalmapping byGSI in the area as andwhen site conditionspermitted

    amidst intermittent slide activity in the area.Themappingwas confined to accessible slopes

    onlyandtherockconditionswereinterpretedfromnearbyexposedarea;andiv)constructionof

    an approach track to the crown of the slide for taking up initial stabilisation of overburden

    slopes.

    GeotechnicalInvestigations

    For suggesting permanent stabilisation measures in the slide area, the site specific

    geological/geotechnicalstudiesproposedare:i)Surveyingandcontouringoftheslideareaon

    1:1,000 scale using Total Station; ii)geological and structural mapping on 1:1,000 scale;

    iii)geophysicalsurveys;iv)geomechanicaltestingofoverburdenmass;v)slopestabilityanalysis

    numerical modeling (by NIRM); vi) monitoring of slope movement by Automatic Target

    Recognition(ATR);andvii)studiesforbiorestorationofoverburdenslopes(byForestResearch

    Institute,Dehradun).

    TreatmentsandStabilisationMeasures

    Followingmain treatmentsweredecided for theVarunavatParvat: i) removalofslide

    massandgradingoftheslopesaboveEl1670m;ii)treatmentoftheCrownPortionEl1895m

    El1670mwiththehelpofrockboltingandshotcreting intherockandbiorestoration inthe

    overburden mass; iii) cable anchoring in two rows above El 1670m, iv) grading of slopes

    betweenEl1670m El1550mandstabilisationbymeansofgeosynthetics/geojute, rock

    boltingandshotcretinginareaswhererockisencountered;v)treatmentalongthethreechutes,

    viz.RamlilaGround,MasjidMohallaandTambakhanichutes;vi)constructionofgeogridwallat

    thetoeofTambakhanichute;vii)constructionofaconcretewallatthetoeofRamlilaGround

    Chutesothatacatchpit iscreatedbackof it;viii)constructionofamaincatchdrainallalong

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion4

    thetoeofVarunavatParvattocollectthedrainageflowingdownthethreechutesandthrough

    theinterveningareas;andix)constructionofabyepasstunnelbelowTambakhanichute.

    CurrentStatusofLandslide

    ThemaintreatmentworksoftheVarunavatParvatlandslideareahavebeencompleted

    in2008and it isworthhighlighting that there isnosliding from the treatedparts for the last

    threeyears,despiteunusuallyhighrainfall(maximuminthelastthreedecades)inUttarakhand

    intheyear2010.ThecontributionofGSI inthe forwarningofVarunavatParvat landslidehas

    beendulyreflected inthePressReleaseofMinistryofMines,Govt.of Indiadated12.01.2005

    (copy enclosed) which itself is the testimony to the importance of the role which GSI,

    UttarakhandUnit,DehradunhasplayedinthetreatmentofVarunavatParvatLandslide.

    GSI has recommended for posttreatment monitoring of the treated part of the

    Varunavat Parvat landslide through a comprehensive monitoring scheme with the help of

    instrumentsandanAutomatedRadarsystem,inordertoassesstheeffectivenessofthesupport

    measures.

    Photo1:ViewofVarunavatParvatbeforeLandslide

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion5

    Photo2:ViewofVarunavatParvatafterLandslideandDevelopmentofthreeChutes(GoogleEarth)

    Photo3:StabilisationinrockbymeansofRockbolting,ChainlinkShotcretingandCableAnchoringin

    easedslope

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion6

    Photo4SupportbymeansofConcretewallandWirecratewallintheCrownPortion

    Photo5SlopeStabilisationinOverburdenMaterialbymeansofGeojute

  • Geological Survey of India

    ContributedbyNorthernRegion7

    Photo6ViewofCatchpitatRamlilaGroundattheRoadLevel

    Photo7ViewofGeogridWallatMasjidMohalla