CS 102 Human-Computer Interaction Lecture 3: Cognition...
Transcript of CS 102 Human-Computer Interaction Lecture 3: Cognition...
CS102: Monsoon 2015
CS 102 Human-Computer Interaction
Lecture 3: Cognition (2)
1
CS102: Monsoon 2015
AdministriviaHope you completed the reading assignment
Reminder: If you miss a class, you must review the alternate reading within a week to get attendance credit. Also review lecture material (the alternate reading is not a substitute.)
Some reference books are held under course reserve in the library
2
CS102: Monsoon 2015
ProjectsPlease post in Moodle about project ideas. Do some research and decide teams and rough outline of project by next Monday.
Some sources of ideas:
Your personal interests/experiences
Things to improve campus
Scan recent conferences (ACM CHI, UIST or CSCW)
Talk to us
Be realistic in scoping out the project
skills, hardware, test subjects, time, …
3
CS102: Monsoon 2015
As we may think
4
CS102: Monsoon 2015
As we may thinkWritten in 1945, after 50-60 years of tech. inventions (Electricity distribution, automobiles, airplanes, movies, TV, telephone, atomic bomb…)
“[Man] has built a civilization so complex that he needs to mechanize his records more fully if he is to push his experiment to its logical conclusion and not merely become bogged down part way there by overtaxing his limited memory.”
5
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memex“A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.”
What’s in the memex vision that’s not on the web today?
6
CS102: Monsoon 20157 http://trevor.smith.name/memex/
CS102: Monsoon 2015
L2: Recap
8
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Elements of Cognition
• Attention
• Perception, recognition
• Memory
• Language, reading, listening, etc.
• Problem-solving, decision making, planning, …
9
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Transactive memory
10
human
Externalized memory to other repositories like other people, paper or written materials, tangible objects, etc.
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory in the Internet age
People forget items they think will be stored on a computer, and remember those they think will not available.
Participants asked to enter trivia facts under 2 conditions: they were told it would be either saved or erased
Mean recall in “erase” condition: 31% vs. “save” condition: 22%
11 Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences...
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory in the Internet age
If people know where to find information, they are less likely to remember it
Participants asked to enter trivia facts and shown one of 3 messages: “erased”, “saved”, “saved in folder X”
Mean correct answer to true/false question:
93% (erased), 88% (saved), 85% (saved to a folder)
12 Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences...
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory in the Internet age
People are primed to turn to the Internet when faced with gaps in knowledge
Demonstrated with a modified Stroop test
13 Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences...
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Stroop testing
Invented by J.R. Stroop in 1935
Uses interference as a way to study access
A more accessible word will cause more interference
Test interference by asking people to name the color a word is written in
14 Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Stroop testing: let’s try it
15 Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
http://cognitivefun.net/test/2
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory in the Internet age
Comparing interference of (e.g.) Google/Yahoo to Nike/Target
Mean 712 ms vs. 591 ms after hard questions
Mean 603 ms vs. 559 ms after easy questions
16 Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences...
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory in the Internet age
“We are becoming symbiotic with our computer tools, growing into interconnected systems that remember less by knowing information than by knowing where the information can be found.”
17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihgXRWaIlVE
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Augmenting Cognition
18
human
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Scanning a web page
19
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Using personal history
20
1010100110101001010101010111010101001010101010101010100101010101010010100100101001010000#
Email history
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Experience-infused browser
21
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Experience-infused browser
22
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Experience-infused browser
23
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Experience-infused browser
The browser is like a second brain with unlimited capacity, and responds within a few seconds.
Provides simple, private personalization of web pages
24
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Memory Testing
25
human
CS102: Monsoon 2015
The memory problem3.8M patients in U.S. have Alzheimer’s, 5.4M MCI
Cost of dementia expected to exceed cancer or heart disease by 2030
Current ways of testing memory are basic
26
CS102: Monsoon 2015
CELL: Cognitive Evaluation with Life-Logs
• Use digital life-logs to establish ground truth for memory tests
• Automatically generate questions from sent email
• If successful, much more accurate and inexpensive way of testing
27
CS102: Monsoon 2015
CELL research issuesDo older people remember less?
(How) does memory drop off over time?
Are more frequently mentioned items better remembered?
Are people names better remembered than other names?
etc…
28
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Example CELL question
29
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Location History
30 http://google.com/locationhistory
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Cognitive biases
31
human
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Psychology of Intelligence Analysis
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Cognitive biases
3 (major) types
• Representativeness
• Availability
• Anchoring and adjustment
32
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Representativeness70% of people are engineers and 30% are lawyers.
"Dick is a 30-year old man. He is married with no children. A man of high ability and high motivation, he promises to be quite successful in his field.”
Judge: Is Dick a lawyer or an engineer?
Leads to base-rate fallacy
33
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Misconceptions of chance
A fair coin is tossed 6 times.
Judge: Which one is more likely?
T H T H H T
H H H H H H
34
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Effect of sample size
2 hospitals:
• 15 children born per day
• 45 children born per day
Babies are 50% boys, 50% girls (on avg.)
Judge: Which hospital (if any) is more likely to have days where > 60% children born are boys?
35
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Effect of sample size
Consider the difference between avg. word length of:
(a) successive pages
(b) successive lines
Which varies more?
36
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Regression to the mean
An extreme instance will likely be followed by an instance that is less so.
For example, after a really bad performance, a better one is likely to follow, and after a really good performance, a worse one is likely to follow.
37
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Causal explanationsWe bias towards causal explanations
But in reality, cause may be due to regression to the mean, external, or not explicitly intended
We bias towards estimating similar sizes of cause and effect
Intuitive to bang on the elevator buttons to summon it faster
A tennis star’s career simply peters out
We overestimate the role of internal factors and underestimate the role of external factors
38
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Oversensitivity to Consistency
Unwarranted generalizations from small sample sizes, e.g.
The train is always late…
Russians are generally….
39
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Availability biasIn the dictionary, does ‘r’ appear more often as the first letter or the third letter?
How many ways to pick 2 members out of 10 vs. 8 members out of 10?
40
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Vividness criterionVivid cases outweigh a much larger body of statistical evidence
“Man-who syndrome”, e.g.
I know a man who had cancer…
I know a man who ran the ultra-marathon…
Leads to an over-estimate of the actual probability
41
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Out of sight, out of mindCorollary: People fail to correct for lack of information
“The average person eats 3 pizzas a year”
Immediacy effect:
“This is the best movie I’ve ever watched.”
“Yesterday was a historic moment!”
42
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Anchoring and adjustmentEstimate
1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8
8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1
In studies, median judgement was 512 vs 2250
Adjustments are usually not enough
43
CS102: Monsoon 2015
Anchoring and adjustmentDiscredited evidence persists even after it is debunked
e.g. “academic urban legend” of decimal point error about the iron content of spinach
44 http://sss.sagepub.com/content/44/4/638.full.pdf+html