Crossing the Chasms of Socio- Ecological Research · 2014-06-12 · Crossing the Chasms of...
Transcript of Crossing the Chasms of Socio- Ecological Research · 2014-06-12 · Crossing the Chasms of...
Crossing the Chasms of Socio-Ecological Research
Structural Holes and Structural Folds in Basic Research Networks
Christian Gulas, Harald Katzmair
FAS.research GmbH
Outline
1. Aim and Scope
2. Approach
3. Resilience #1: Potential and Connectedness
4. Resilience #2: Cross-Scale-Linkages
5. Conclusions
6. Next Steps
© FAS.research 2010
1. Aim and Scope
• Long term study on collaboration and knowledge networks in the field of Austrian basic research
• Use models and concepts of Systems Ecology to interpret structural characteristics
• Determine the impact of energy input and resource flows on network morphology
• Operationalize “resilience” to identify adaptive science fields, research areas, and scientific disciplines.
© FAS.research 2010
Data Overview
Data Source:
Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research, Austrian Science Fund Project Data Base
Time Period: 2003 – 2007
Projects: 3.188
Disciplines: 928
© FAS.research 2010
Classification of Scientific Disciplines
© FAS.research 2010
1-Digits Scientific Field 2-Digits Research Area 4-Digits Scientific Discipline
1 Natural Sciences
11Mathematics, Computer Sciences
1102 Algebra
1103 Analysis
12 Physics, Mechanics, Astronomy1201 General mechanics
1202 Acoustics
… … … …
2 Technical Sciences 21 Mining, Metallurgy2102 Mining engineering
… …
3 Human Medicine 31 Anatomy, Pathology3102 General pathology
… …
4Agriculture & Forestry,Veterinary Medicine
41Agronomy, Plant Breeding, Plant Protection
4102 Irrigated agriculture
… …
5 Social Sciences 51 Political Sciences5101 General political science
… …
6 Humanities 61 Philosophy6101 General philosophy
… …
Resilience Definitions
• (Social) Life as a process of generative disruption and creative destruction.
• Resilience defined as being able to deliver value under changing conditions.
• Resilience defined as capacity to adapt to and shape change.
• Resilience defined as capacity to operate, respond & react under critical conditions (stress and disturbances).
© FAS.research 2010
The Adaptive Cycle
© FAS.research 2010
Lance H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling: Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, pp. 25 – 62.
The Adaptive Cycle
© FAS.research 2010
Lance H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling: Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, pp. 25 – 62.
1. StoragePotential that is inherentin accumulated resources
2. FlowsConnectedness of actors
Two Dimensions of Network Emergence
1.Potential
Available resources – operationalized as funding.
2. Connectedness
Clustering – operationalized as extend of triadicrelationships
© FAS.research 2010
2. Connectedness
© FAS.research 2010
Connectedness is operationalized as clustering.
Clustering means beeing connected to actors which areconnected themselves
Extend of triadic relationships!
© FAS.research 2010
Disciplines with higher clustering than expected
Difference betweenobserved and expectedvalues in percent.
© FAS.research 2010
1 social circle Not overlapping social circles linked through ONE Broker
Overlapping social circles, linked through SEVERAL “Multiple Insiders”
Closure Network Brokerage Network Structural Fold Network
Structural Fold Networks
Brokerage /closure concept, R.S. BURT
Balázs VEDRES, David STARK
© FAS.research 2010
Measuring Overlapping Cross-Scale Cliques
Search for cliques (maximal connected subgraphs).
Clique 1 Clique 2
© FAS.research 2010
Measuring Overlapping Cross-Scale Cliques
Search for cliques (maximal connected subgraphs).
Only cross-scale links – delete all connections within researchareas (2-Digit Codes).
Biology
Physics
Mathematics, Computer Sciences
Chemistry
Anatomy, Pathology
Arts
Historical Sciences
Philosophy
© FAS.research 2010
Regression: Funding and Overlapping Cliques
Additional funding of€ 500.000.- increases thenumber of cliques by 1.
© FAS.research 2010
Disciplines with more Cliques than expected
Difference betweenobserved and expectedvalues in percent.
© FAS.research 2010
Cliques Co-Membership Network
Natural Sciences/Human Medicine(Life Sciences) Humanities/Social Sciences
© FAS.research 2010
• No intercohesion between natural sciences and humanities
• Natural sciences and human medicine dominate the network
• Life sciences particularly connect biological and medical research areas.
• Highly adaptive models and methods (biology, human medicine, and social sciences)
• Historical sciences dominate the field of humanities.• Social sciences are highly differentiated (many codes); at
the same time highly centralized and hierarchical, low clustering
• Social sciences need new links to innovative models and concepts (Ecosystem Research)
© FAS.research 2010
• „Dynamic“ application of the Adaptive Cycle Heuristic
• Time series analysis of knowledge networks
• New operationalization of „cross-scale linkages“
(beyond time and space borders)
• Strengthen relationship between ecosystem and
social system research
• Deepen our understanding of systems of people and
nature