Cross Examination (CX) Debate
description
Transcript of Cross Examination (CX) Debate
![Page 1: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cross Examination (CX) DebateOverview
![Page 2: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality
Founded on Definitions Significance
Walls (Harms) frame the issue
Plan/Solvency Covers all harms
Inherency Inherent Barrier
Advantages Extras (bonus benefits)
![Page 3: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CX DebateTopicality
![Page 4: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Review Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 5: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Topicality Resolved: The United States
federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States.
Define each word Have definitions and standards for all
terms
![Page 6: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Example
![Page 7: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Set a Standard Types Of Standards
Legal definitions Bright line Framer’s intent Each word has a meaning
Make sure you have standards to support
![Page 8: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Check Your Sources Possible
Dictionaries Black ‘s Law
Dictionary Words and Phrases Webster’s New
World On-line Dictionaries
Webster’s New Collegiate
STAY AWAY FROM WIKIPEDIA
![Page 9: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Run To Government Documents
Government documents may prove each word has meaning
Example: PUBLIC HEALTH
ASSISTANCE
![Page 10: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Apply To Case
MAKE SURE YOUR DEFINITIONS FIT YOUR CASE BECAUSE THE NEGATIVE TEAM WILL PRESENT COUNTER DEFINTIONS
![Page 11: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Questions
?
![Page 12: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CX DebateSignificance
![Page 13: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Review Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 14: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Significance Answers the Question:
“What is the Harm in the Status Quo?” Status Quo
“The current situation, the problem that the topic is seeking to repair”
“The way things are now.” (Debating Policies, p. 43)
![Page 15: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Significance Harms are:
Claims about what in the status quo is bad
Quantifiable or Unquantifiable: Quantifiable: Perhaps 50 million people are
currently malnourished. Unquantifiable : Loss of freedom or unethical
corporate behavior Both quantifiable and unquantifiable harms
are strong.
![Page 16: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Significance Harm 1 - Title
Subpoint A) – Tag Line Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Subpoint B) – Tag Line Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Subpoint C) – Tag Line Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Tag Line 5-7 Word to Summary
Citation Author [Title]
OROrganization
Date URL (if applicable)
Rules of Evidence Whole sentences Underline key sentances
![Page 17: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Example
![Page 18: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CX DebateInherency
![Page 19: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Review Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 20: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Inherency Answers the Question:
“What’s preventing your plan from happening today (i.e. in the status quo)?”
Claim that the status quo will not be changed
As a result, harms will continue indefinitely
![Page 21: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Inherency Inherency – Title
Tag line Citation Evidence
Tag line Citation Evidence
1 to 2 cards
Types of Inherency Structural
What is preventing your plan …. Attitudinal
Who is preventing your plan … Existential
No Infrastructure exists to solbe
![Page 22: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Example
![Page 23: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CX DebateSolvency
![Page 24: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Review Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 25: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The Plan Is your proposed course of action to
solve for the harms. Written in your own words. Should be simple, straightforward,
and take you 30 seconds or so to read.
![Page 26: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The Plan Structure:
Plank 1) Agent of Change What agency will make the change?
Plank 2) What steps must go into implementing this
change Legislative changes Judicial decisions Executive agencies/ policy changes
![Page 27: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Plan Structure:
Plank XX) Funding Where exactly is the money coming from
Normal means Funding source – have evidence on how much and
from where Anticipate DAs
![Page 28: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Plan Structure:
Planks XX) Enforcement What agency will implement/enforce this
change? Normal means Executive department
“All speeches serve to clarify legislative intent”
![Page 29: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example
![Page 30: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Solvency The argument that your plan would
work. Responds to questions such as:
Will the funding for the plan work out? Will the funding be sufficient? Will it solve the harms?
![Page 31: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Solvency Where the rubber meets the road Plan-Meets-Need
Does the plan solve for all harms? Does the plan remove the Inherent
Barrier Beyond solvency for the problems, does
plan have any other net benefits/harms? Plan benefits = Advantages Plan harms = Disadvantages
Learn to anticipate likely Neg. DAs
![Page 32: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Example
![Page 33: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CX DebateAdvantages
![Page 34: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Review Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 35: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Advantages Link to plan
A plank of the plan would result in Advantage
Not extra-topical Stay within resolution
Evidence based Not solvency/Unique advantages
(i.e. economic, efficiency, advances) Have impacts (importance)
Be able to weigh versus disadvantages (DAs)
![Page 36: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Advantage Example
![Page 37: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CX DebateFinal Case Requirements
![Page 38: Cross Examination (CX) Debate](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568162e0550346895dd364f5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Final Case Requirements
Definitions Harm 1 Harm 2 Harm 3 Inherency Plan Solvency Advantage 1 Advantage 2
8:00 min. total In page protectors
in ½” black binder Time markers
printed on bottom of each page
2 Test Grades: Text Time